SM & Mahabharata
SM & Mahabharata
SM & Mahabharata
LOGISTICS:
ARMY GENERALS:
Kauravas Pandavas
Bhishma Arjuna
Dronacharya Bhima
Karna Dhrishtadyumana
Shalay Abhimanyu
Kripacharya Ghatotkach
Ashwatthama Shikhandi
Duryodhana Satyaki
BACKGROUND:
Kauravas: Were in power for 13 years. Duryodhana was a benevolent king and
subjects did not miss Pandavas
They had wealth and power of Hastinapur and of Indraprastha (Pandavas labored to
build and had surpassed Hastinapur in many respects).
Pandavas: Exiled for 13 years and had no kingdom though they were the rightful heir
to Hastinapur, annexed by Duryodhana.
Their main strength was friends and relatives and allies like the Panchals, the Yadavas,
the Magadhas and the Chedis.
MOTIVATION:
Kauravas: “Without war, will concede not a needle-prick of earth.”
- Duryodhana
Duryodhana was completely focused on the War. It was his moment of truth. He had
usurped a kingdom, and he meant to keep it. He had resorted to any means, foul or fair, to get
the kingdom, which he believed to be rightfully his, and he was in no mood to give it up.
Pandavas: “We fight over a Kingdom, as dogs over a piece of meat”.
Yudhishtira
The Pandavas had been humiliated, their wife insulted, their kingdom taken. But still
they wanted to avoid the War. The three elder Pandavas were against the War. They even went
as far as making an offer that they will stop the War in exchange for five villages.
RESULT:
Pandavas: Though in exile they turned their attention to improving over their
weakness.
ALLIES:
Kauravas: Centralised power system. And the greatest empire of the time. But not
many powerful allies, except from old relations from far off places like Gandhara
(Shakuni), Sindhu (Jayadrath) and Cambodia (Camboja – Bhagadutt).
Pandavas: No wealth. No power of their own. But powerful allies all over India.
2
• The Rakshasas through marriage of Bhima and Hidimba
• The Nagas through marriage
LEADERSHIP:
Kauravas: Centralised leadership. One head of Army at a time, who has supreme
authority of 11 akshouni of army; Bhishma, Drona, Karna, Shalya and Ashwatthama.
Pandavas: Distributed leadership; seven commanders for the seven divisions, ie.,
(I man commands 1 akshouni each)
TEAM SPIRIT:
They did not gel well with each other. Bhishma and Karna, Bhishma and Shakuni,
Karna and Shakuni, Karna and Shalya, Shalya and Bhishma were like bees, hornets
and mosquitoes put together in a jar.
Pandavas: One team. One Goal. As men, they all had huge respect for Krishna and
Yudhishthira. While as warriors they were in complete awe of Bhima and Arjuna. Most
of them were close relatives – cousins, brothers – in – law, fathers – in – law. More
than that they were all part of the decision making process. It was their “common” war.
INDIVIDUAL MOTIVE:
3
Kauravas: Except for Duryodhana nobody wanted the War. All the four main
Generals had strong ties with the Pandavas.
• Bhishma - Won’t kill the Pandavas (grandchildren). Will kill a thousand soldiers
each day
• .Drona - Won’t kill the Pandavas (students). Will capture them only.
• Shalya (Nakul-Sahadeva’s maternal uncle) – Loved the Pandavas and covertly helped
them by humiliating Karna
• Karna (brother to the Pandavas) - Promised not to kill any of the other Pandavas save
Arjuna.
A team of Traitors
Pandavas: Common Goal. But the individuals had their individual targets. Their own
agenda which just became one with the team’s agenda.
• Dhratsadyumna _ Drona
• Shikhandi - Bhishma
• Satayaki - Bhurisravas
• Arjuna - Karna
• Bhima - Duryodhana and his brothers
• Sahadeva - Shakuni and his sons
• Nakula - Karna’s sons
Kauravas: As already stated, the BIG 4 had big emotional attachment with the 5
Pandavas. Their commitment faltered.
• Bhishma himself gave away the secret of killing him to the Pandavas. He
prolonged the War by killing only insignificant soldiers. He did not fight a warrior like
Shikhandi because of his personal bias.
• Drona too indirectly gave away his secret; by saying he was invulnerable as long as
He held a weapon. Moreover, he abandoned weapons as soon as he knew his son
had died.
• Karna did not kill Yudhisthira and Bhima when he got the chance. He gave away his
Kavach and Kundala prior to his War. Karna fled innumerous times from the War
when he was hurt. He did not save Duhsasana when Bhima was killing him.
• Shalya kept on insulting Karna while in battle.
Pandavas:
• Abhimanyu, a 16-year old kid ventured beyond enemy lines alone. This was a suicide
Mission, but he still went in and took a great part of the enemy down with him. It took
the combined efforts of 7 Maharthis to take him down.
• Ghatotkach, even in death, took with him almost half the army.
• Yudhisthira knew he could not face Karna in War, but still went in to set an example.
Yudhisthira did not hesitate to tell a lie or a twisted truth when faced with the decision
of whether to stick to his personal integrity or welfare of the team.
4
• Krishna took up arms twice and almost entered the War, despite his promise, only to
be stopped by Arjuna
RIGHT MANAGERS:
THE ROOTS:
Pandavas:
• Spent the greater part of their lives in poverty. Childhood in the Himalayan foothills
among Rishis. One year exile among the poor people of Kuru-Panchala. 12 years of
Vanvas and 1 year of Agyatvas.
• Experienced with ground reality. Contact with people from various strata of the
society. Sanyasis (celibate monks), Acharyas (householders, teachers), poor
Brahmanas, lower-class potter.
• Different races of people. Rakshasas, Gandharvas, Apsaras, Nagas. People from
Different regions Uttarkuru, Bengal, etc,
WOMEN EMPOWERMENT:
5
Shakuni, Duryodhana, Karna, Duhsasana. No women in the decision making
process.
• Draupadi was a companion in whatever the Pandavas did. She had a big role
in the entire decision making. Without her the Pandavas would have most probably
reclined to the forests.
• Even the younger Pandavas: Ghatotkach, Abhimanyu and Iravan were brought up by
their mothers. So the female influence was huge.
MORAL: WOMAN = BETTER HALF. ANY TEAM WHICH DOES NOT HAVE
WOMEN IS UNBALANCED, FOR THE MASCULINE TRAITS OF AGGRESSION AND
DOMINANCE SHOULD BE BALANCED BY THE FEMININE TRAITS OF HARMONY
AND SUSTENANCE.
RECAP: