Gbermic Quiz 2 Merged
Gbermic Quiz 2 Merged
Gbermic Quiz 2 Merged
3. Virtue Ethics
● Ethical = in line with good character
● In line with personal virtues
○ Virtues (traits or characters that
make a person ethical)
● Cardinal virtues - wisdom (prudence),
courage, temperance, and justice
○ Wisdom - nagko-control sa ibang
virtue
○ Temperance - trying to weigh what
is the appropriate action for a
particular situation
○ Justice - how you relate to other
people
● Focus on moral agent especially what are
the virtue of that particular person treasures -
virtue ethics
Sustainable- both a worldview and a business model Issue 2: Ethics of Digital Finance
Backgr Disruptions in digital finance have created several
Issue 1: Sustainable Development and Growth ound opportunities and threats in the context of the
Backgr Clamor for sustainable growth for business and global economy. Trends such as cryptocurrencies
ound governments alike due to environmental and social and cashless payments are seen to shape how we
concerns on top of economic motivations do business and accounting in the future.
- we are facing the consequences of
climate change - erratic weather pattern, Issue How should digital transactions be regulated (e.g.,
melting polar caps -> if that will continue taxed) to ensure that they serve legitimate
there would be a rise in water level for low purposes?
lying countries - cryptocurrency is a double edge
- some will argue that it is an
Issue Are organizations able to promote a (e.g., investment facility
triple-bottom line) balanced growth or not? Can - means to facilitate illegal
organizations promote a balanced triple bottom line transactions/illegal trade set
growth or not? because of the anonymity
- we are coming from that big pure afforded by cryptocurrency such
capitalistic motivation that the only job of as bitcoins
corporation is be profitable - the question is anchored to a larger
- we are now shifting to a more equitable question ensuring the trends in digital
and more sustainable corporate finance would serve the legitimate needs
development and corporate growth model of human beings
to include all aspects triple-bottom line
such as people and planet Examp Bitcoin being used for money laundering and other
- we have to accept that corporations are le illegal transactions
structured in a way reminiscence of that - trends like technological trends,
original corporate view which is the technological updates and upgrades are
capitalistic view of organization actually amoral but it depends how people
- when we compare side by side how would use these trends
corporations are structured, is that
particular structure align with the triple
Issue 3: Self versus Public Interest
bottom line framework or a sustainable
development model Backg Across accounting, business, and public
- Some will argue that cooperatives are round governance, conflicts of interest (COI) are a
aligned with sustainable development paramount concern. COI can manifest in many ways
growth including multiple competing stakes of the same
- With the structural limitations that the public and business leaders.
organizations and corporations have right - specific issue not just in accounting
now, can we really foster sustainable - dilemma between the self and public
growth by looking at the organization? interest
- Two issues: (1) positive — what is - can be taken individually and collectively
happening right now? (2) normative — - for the collective version of the self
can it really happen? vs. public interest, let look at the
self as a reference group
Examp Plastics sachets are the preferred packages for (profession) -> the profession
le developing countries interest vs. the public interest
- unintended (oligopoly?)
- Environmental part -> do we break the big
- if you look at the volume of solid accounting firms or do we
waste that was collected in our let them stand?
rivers most of them are plastic
sachets Issue What mechanisms must be put in place in order to
- you cannot separate this issue assure that public interest is protected?
from poverty - when we become professionals, business
- poverty is a systematic leaders, or public servants -> we are
issue that needs subjecting our self interest secondarily to
systematic solution the interest of the general public
- Reflection of phenomena more
Maria Camel Luzara
Page 10
- when you become a professional, you and very strict
already chosen to subject your personal - Gray lines: it opens the application of
happiness to the common good -> prioritize some regulations to certain interpretations
common good - How do we prevent some accountants and
- This issue is structural, other issue here is even some auditors in abusing gray lines
something personal/subjective -> what do
we do?
- birds theory of moral development -> Issue 5: Governance Mechanism Reforms
transformative stage Backgr With the changes brought about by 1,2,3, & 4,
- Why are we selecting government leaders ound regulators and governance mechanisms must be
and business leaders who are prone to updated in order to address these issues. For
prioritizing their self interest towards public example, a similar (hard) regulation to the US
interest? Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 is yet to be passed in
the country.
Exam Exposure draft for Public Accountants related to the - The US Sarbanes-Oxley Act is a resulting
ple non-provision of NAS to PIE audit clients. legal regulation because of the ENRON
- public accountants should not provide scandal. It solidifies what we mean by
non-assurance services to their public good corporate governance (what are the
interest entity audit clients -> to safeguard mechanisms that we have to put in place
the public interest to ensure good corporate governance)
- We don’t have hard regulation related to
corporate governance in the Philippines.
Issue 4: Bright (Rules-Based) versus Gray
We only have soft regulation.
(Principles-Based Lines)
- soft regulation: it is a issuance by
Backgr Previously, accounting standards are said to be the SEC
ound anchored on a rule-based system. However, the
current version of the IFRS is considered Issue What are the governance reforms that must be put
principles-based which is meant to capture the in place in order to respond to the other issues?
economic substance of business transactions.
However, principles-based regulations result to gray Exampl GME stock issue in the US.
lines as opposed to bright lines. e - GME stock - a stock with very low
- rule-based system: the rules are very clear fundamentals already -> profit are so
-> when this happen, you have to this small, the growth potential is very low, but
(algorithm) some traders (particularly traders in a
- not very compatible with a free reddit form) pump the GME stock price
market - Question: Do we need to regulate those
- principles-based: the regulations or the types of activities?
rules of how we apply accounting became - There is very little regulation that has
gray been done to address the GME issue
because corporations in America are
Issue How can accountants ensure that principles-based leaning towards individualism.
standards effectively capture the economic - Why do we need to regulate that particular
substance of the transaction? What are the activity when in fact it’s actually a result of
mechanisms that should be in place to prevent the consenting contractual parties?
abuse of gray-line regulations?
Exampl Goodwill in the current IFRS is not amortized but - Do we have enough governance mechanisms to
e tested for impairment annually compared to the answer this issue?
previous rules where Goodwill is amortized. - Those are the five issues that are shaping, have been
- Previously, goodwill was amortized. shaping, and definitely shape how we do business
Goodwill is an intangible asset with and accounting in an ethical way in the future.
indefinite useful life.
- However when we shifted to
principles-based accounting standards ->
the rule of amortization was change
- substance: the asset is for
indefinite useful life so, why do
we have to amortize this for 10
years? What tells us that 10 years
is the appropriate year?
- not amortize goodwill but test for
impairment -> testing goodwill for
impairment will have some gray
lines
- Bright lines: the regulations are very clear
● What?
○ My experience when I was first bullied into
giving my answers to my classmates during
an exam. (4W, 1H)
- personal experience
- need to discuss the 4W and 1H
- defend why this is really an ethical
moral issue
● So what?
○ Looking back, I may have approached the
matter using a virtue ethics frame.
○ Virtue ethics state…..
○ Its aspects that I applied in this situation
are….
- analyze the experience
- state what you are applying
- state what are these theories (in a
gist what is virtue ethics?)
- How would these apply to your
experience?
- Example: I was able to
resolve by being a firm,
not giving in to peer
pressure because I believe
that honesty is the virtue
that I have to work for.
● Now what?
○ This learning will help me in approaching
intimidation issues as I become an
accountant.
○ For example…
○ Virtue ethics has taught me that….which will
allow me to approach the issue in….because
Summary
- it is a developmental theory
- the brain -> it’s about moral reasoning
- two paths -> choose a decision
- it’s a developmental theory about moral reasoning in arriving at a decision
- focus on how the decisions are made and not on what decisions are to be made
- descriptive and normative
3. Postconventional
- most advance
- beyond convention/ beyond people
- normally called principled morality
- focus on principles
- deontological
- virtue ethics
- rule utilitarian
- ability to decide based on principles that would normally transcends self interest and the
need of the society at large
- very few people will transcend to postconventional especially stage 6
Summary:
- convention: moral reasoning is attached to other people to the society at large
- selfie: before/pre - the self
- solar system: focus is something beyond our self, our time tested principles
Level 1: Stage 1
- focus is the self when you decide
● Obedience to rules
● Avoidance of punishment
- focus is the immediate self
- short run
● Peter Pettigrew is a good example of someone in L1S1. His decisions are motivated by fear of
punishment from Tom Riddle.
Level 1: Stage 2
● Satisfy personal needs
● Instrumental-relativist
● Rewards
Level 2: Stage 3
- focus: the others especially the immediate circle
● Good boy/nice girl
● Immediate circle
● Fairness to others
Level 2: Stage 4
- focus: the others, the society at large
● Morality of law
● Duty to social order
● Larger society
Level 3: Stage 5
- focus: values (universal principles)
● Social contract
● Own interpretations of societal values
● Law is respected but subject to exceptions
Level 3: Stage 6
- focus: universal ethical principles
● Universal Ethical Principles
● Justice, Equity, Rights
- your guiding compass is not your self, not the other, not only the law with exception, but
rather universal ethical principles
- there exist these set of principles such as justice, equity, and rights that you will use as
your point of analysis for your decision making
- you can use either deontological ethics (categorical imperative, virtues)
- example: jean valjean
- As he went along the way and develop these particular universal ethical
principles particularly justice, rights and respect for the human person
- One of the pivotal section in Les Miserables is when Bishop Myriel actually gave
Jean Valjean the candlesticks
- Jean Valjean stole from the bishop so some officers of the law found him with the
stolen items
- Instead of saying that yes he really stole them. The Bishop told the
officers that he gave the items to Jean Valjean and said he actually forgot
another item that he gave to him. Then, he hands him the candelabra
● Emotion matters, and duties, rights, and obligations are just one way of thinking about ethics
○ It is a family of beliefs about the way values should be manifested in character and in
behavior.
○ Unified my shared concerns and commitments and by the rejection of the traditional
philosophical be that ethics can be adequately represented by rules and principles
○ Kohlberg: Should a man steal an expensive drug to save the life of his wife?
Heinz dilemma
- Girls approach dilemma in a lower stage
- Kohlberg concluded that boys reason more effectively than girls
- young western boys tend to develop higher and higher moral reasoning from absolute self
interest to realization of rights and justice for everyone equally
Liberalism
● which states that man is rational liberal equal unencumbered autonomous and right sparing
individual
● Her own research suggests that women tend to struggle with moral dilemmas in a different way.
That the little voice that they hear is a different voice than the one men tend to hear.
Carol Gilligan notes that Kohlberg’s results indicate male bias and that there is no reason to assume the
stereotypical male method of reasoning is superior to the stereotypical female method of reasoning
● it is enough to demonstrate the importance of values that belong to the ethics of care by showing
how they play a role in the moral life of individuals and society
Gilligan’s Reinterpretation
● Women have traditionally been taught a different kind of moral outlook for emphasizes solidarity,
community, and caring about one special relationships
● The “care view” of morality has been ignored or trivialize because women were traditionally in
positions of limited power and influence
● It would instead say that we can and should put the interest of those who are close to us above
the interest of complete strangers.
● Ethics of care contrasts with more well-known ethical views, such as utilitarianism and deontology
or Kantian ethics. The traditional outlook is what feminist critics calls a “justice view” mc of
morality
care ethics can be seen as a part of the traditional enterprise of philosophical ethics
● act so as to promote the good of others if this is so then care ethics is a part of the enterprise of
ethics it is not necessarily an alternative to a moral theory
So what does this mean it means that rules are inappropriate and unnecessary where certain human
relationships are concerned the abstract principles can capture everything relevant to making moral
decisions we can’t just slap the rule onto every situation instead have an understanding of the
complexities of the particular situation in which a moral problem has occurred and we need a deep and
detailed understanding of the people their interests and feelings and only with this is it possible to
sensitively respond to their problem
Summary:
● Kohlberg suggested that women simply could not engage in moral reasoning, because in his
experiments, they were attentive to what he believed to be irrelevant factors like context in
relationships, and did not frequently cite relevant principles.
● While Gilligan reinterpreted these results in light of gender studies and feminist ethics and
concluded that women typically do reason in a morally acceptable manner, simply that they find
different kinds of factors to be relevant.
● The ethics of care is an ethics promoted by Gilligan and Nel Noddings, who believe that
we behave morally and in as much as we care for those with whom we have personal
relationships.
● They assert that emotive factors are relevant factors. Making the emotive admissible to moral
deliberation interferes with our desire to be objective but satisfies our understanding that we have
different moral rules concerning people close to us.
● Ethics of care is further criticized by contemporary feminist on the grounds that it reinforces
stereotypical female roles.
○ traditional values placed emphasis on disinterested, detachment, and dispassionate
objective judging
○ Gilligan says this is inappropriate and mistaken. Why? because it excludes the very
values that are most relevant to a moral situation and most important to the people
involved
○ this means that we must make an effort to develop individuals who respond appropriately
to moral situation or recognize importance of personal relationships respect others and
accept responsibility
The four component model of morality was developed by James Rest in 1983 and further developed and
applied by Rest and Darcia Narvaez in 1995 and by Muriel Bebeau in 2006.
Rest’s Model
It addresses the ways that moral behavior occurs, and allows for conceptualization of successful moral
functioning and the capacities it requires.
● The model is not linear and its components are interactive. Furthermore, Rest notes in contrast to
other models of moral function the four component model of morality assumes co-occurrence in
all areas of moral functioning of cognition and effect. Thus, moral behavior is not the result of
separate processes rather each of the four components involves both affective and cognitive
processes.
Business ethics educators Charles Powers and David Vogel identified six factors or elements that
underline moral reasoning and behavior that are particularly relevant in organizational settings, these
factors include:
● moral imagination
● moral identification and ordering
● moral evaluation
● tolerating moral disagreement and ambiguity
● integrate managerial competence with moral competence
● moral obligation
James Rest of the University of Minnesota developed the most widely used model of moral behavior
● He started with the end product—the moral action—and then determined the steps that produce
such behavior.
● He concluded that ethical action is the result of four psychological sub processes which includes:
○ moral sensitivity (recognition)
○ moral judgment
○ moral focus (motivation)
○ moral commitment
● This model is not a linear, time down-sequence. There may be complicated interactions between
the various components.
○ For example, a person’s way of defining what is morally right (component 2) may affect
the person's interpretation of the situation (component 1) the model should be thought of
as depicting a logical order for the development of a moral behavior to occur
● It is the first step in ethical decision making because we can’t solve the moral problem unless we
first know that one exists.
● Empathy and perspectives skills are essential to this component of moral action
○ paying attention to our emotions can be an important clue that we are faced with an
ethical dilemma
○ sympathy and compassion or other suffering emotions
○ gratitude and elevation or other praising or positive emotions that open us up to new
opportunities and relationships
● We may even deceive ourselves into thinking that we are acting morally when we are clearly not,
a process called ethical fading.
○ anger, disgust and contempt or other condemning emotions
○ shame, embarrassment, and guilt or self-conscious emotions that encourage us to obey
the rules and uphold the social order
● we can take steps to enhance our ethical sensitivity
Moral Judgment
The next component, moral judgment, requires the person to move beyond recognizing the ethical
dimensions present in a given situation to explore which line of action is morally justified.
● Moral judgment has generated more research than the other components of Rest’s model.
○ Harvard psychologist, Lawrence Kohlberg, argued that individuals progress through a
series of moral stages just as they do physical ones
○ Kohlberg identified three levels of moral development each divided in 2 stages
● Rest developed the defining issues test (DIT) to measure moral development.
○ hundreds of studies using the DIT revealed at moral reasoning generally increases with
age and education
● Principled leaders can boost the moral judgment of a group by encouraging members to adopt
more sophisticated ethical schemas.
○ the purpose of this component is deciding which one of these courses of action is morally
right
- taking moral judgment seem to come naturally to people it almost seems that humans are either
genetically built to make moral judgments or quickly conditioned by social experience to make
them
People’s intuitions are drastically different regarding what is right and wrong and individuals have great
certainty about their moral convictions
- sometimes individuals want to do the right thing but their integrity can be overpowered
- others never intend to follow an ethical course of action but engage in moral hypocrisy instead
Moral Commitment
Moral character and competence acknowledges that sensitivity, judgment, and prioritization of moral
values must lead to moral character and competence or moral behavior will fail
● It has also been found that having a positive affective state any focusing on the expectation of
success can determine the amount of effort that will be expended and how long it will be
sustained in the face of adversity
○ assertiveness, perseverance, resoluteness, competence, courage, and character are
attributes that lead to success
○ the positive character traits include courage, prudence, integrity, humility, reverence,
optimism, and compassion
● in addition to virtues other personal characteristics contribute to moral action
○ those with a strong will or internal locus of control and lastly
● Successful implementation also requires competence
The interaction among the four components can have a decided impact on morals behavior
● if an overlap exist between two potentially moral situation
○ being concerned about one moral situation can cause insensitivity to another one which
begins before the first is completed
○ sometimes the attention and effort needed to carry out one task are so great that the
subject can attend to little else
○ as the cost of moral action comes to be recognized a person made a store to feelings of
obligation, denying personal responsibility or reappraising the situation, so as to make
alternative actions more appropriate
○ as people realize the implications of component 2 and 3 processes, they may defensively
re-appraise their interpretation of the situation so, they can still feel honorable but at less
cost to themselves
What made them come together? the market failures is the very context
VBL: Context of the series of reflections in an attempt to help address the global challenges that have
adversely affected people and communities
● In paragraph one of the VBL, it says
“Unfortunately, this century has also brought business scandals and serious economic
disturbances and an erosion of trust in business organizations and in free market institutions. For
business leaders this is a time that calls for witness of faith, the confidence of hope and the
practice of love.”
The document emphasizes the crucial role of businesses and governments in promoting social justice
and the common good
- All of these four components make social justice so, social justice happens only
when all four components are present in societies and communities
- The absence of just one component would mean the obliteration or annihilation
or destruction of social justice
- common good is never possible without social justice
Because enterprises affect persons and persons are in communities, the VBL emphasizes respect for human dignity
and the common good as the foundational principles which should inform the way we organize labor and capital
employed as well as the processes of innovation in a market system.
VBL par 38
“The deep and abiding purposes of individual businesses and commercial systems is to address real
human needs.”
GOOD GOODS
● Businesses should produce goods and services that should meet authentic human needs such as
life-saving medical services, education, health care, affordable housing, but also goods and
services that genuinely contribute to human development and fulfillment. Good entrepreneur
gives first thought to service then second to gain second
● Meet the needs of the vulnerable members in society such as the poor, the elderly, the
handicapped and life.
○ Developments in the field of the bottom of the pyramid products and services such as
micro enterprises, micro credit, social enterprises, and social investment funds will help
lift people from extreme poverty and this could spark their own creativity and
entrepreneurship, contributing to their own development.
GOOD WORK
● Good and effective, efficient and engaging
○ it means that the enterprise must organize work in order for business processes to be
effective, efficient and engaging
● Autonomous
Hence, from this standpoint an enterprise that practices the ethical principles of business produces good
goods, organizes good work and creates good wealth.
To attain or achieve the delivery of good goods, the organization of good work and the creation of good
wealth
● is the vocation of the business leader
○ business leaders can put their aspirations into practice when they pursue their vocation
motivated by much more than financial success
○ when they integrate the gifts of spiritual life, the virtues and ethical principles into their life
and work they may overcome the divided life and receive the grace to foster the integral
development of all business stakeholders
○ the church calls upon the business leader to receive and to give entering into communion
with others to make the world a better place
An enterprise that delivers good goods, organizes good work and creates good wealth becomes our
medium for the promotion of the common good. It likewise serves as our organized way of caring for our
social body or our communities and because when enterprises heed the call of the principles of ethical
business, they won't overlook responding to the needs of the less privileged in society it can also very
well become our organized exercise of the option for the poor. All institutions, business enterprises,
governments, universities, even non-profit organizations, have the potential to become our medium for
love of neighbor.
- CMD MODELS - talks about how do we progress, how do we develop morally, how do we
transform morally/ethically
- Kohlberg’s Model (3 levels and 6 stages)
- Gilligan’s Ethic of Care - response to Kohlberg’s model
- Rest’s Model
- some would say that we are what we repeatedly do
- Normative Guides
- Deontology
- Utilitarianism
- VBL
- how we promote our vocation as business leader as accountants
- see, judge, and act model
- Act is related to motivation and character
c. What are the preliminary pertinent accounting, auditing , and business issues?
i. Is this about sustainability as a business issue?
ii. Is this about accounting ethics?
iii. Is this about auditing value for example professional skepticism?
d. What is the ethical dilemma?
Detailed Script
1. See: Being Sensitive to the Issue and its Nuances
1.1. Gather the facts (Mintz & Morris, 2013; Angeles, 2020)
- be very careful in gathering the facts
- don’t add what is not patently obvious
- don’t make several assumptions
- gather the facts as they are
1.2. Identify the stakeholders and their stakes (obligations and rights)(Mintz & Morris, 2013;
Angeles, 2020)
1.3. Identify the preliminary issues and guidance concerning (Mintz & Morris, 2013):
1.3.1. Accounting and Auditing (e.g., code of ethics, financial reporting standards,
auditing standards)
1.3.2. Business (e.g., strategy and operations)
- is there a corresponding business issue
- if you have a tentative guide
1.4. Articulate the ethical dilemma based on facts, stakes, and preliminary issues (Angeles,
2020)
Seeing
1.1. Facts of the Case
● Malaya was asked by Matapang to charge the former's hours to another client.
● The said practice is considered a normal business practice in the organization.
● The practice aims to spread out costs across clients and maintain market share.
● The practice does not affect the clients since the audit fees billed to them is still the same (i.e.,
practice only affects internal reporting).
1.2 Stakeholders
● Primary: Malaya, Engagement Team, Accounting Firm
● Secondary: The clients
Judging
2. Alternatives and Weight
Alternative Impact to Stakeholders Positive Negative
A2: Charge to the Malaya Will preserve personal Will disobey superior
correct client code. integrity and might be
reprimanded
Engagement Team Accurate reporting of Client account will be
costs overcharged.
Accounting Firm
Acting
Which is the more important value?
- Deontology: In guiding your answer in that question which is the more important value -> we can
go to what would the categorically imperative say. This might be construed as an issue related to
truth telling.
- Utilitarianism: What would utilitarianism say? What would benefit the most number of people in
the long run?
- Virtue ethics: What is in line with the character of a good person?
● What are the obstacles that you will face? How will you face them? Which value did you uphold?
Is there no middle ground?
- sometimes the middle ground is a win-win solution
The code sets out fundamental principles of ethics for professional accountants reflecting the profession's recognition
of its public interest responsibility.
- the principles outlined in this code establishes the standard of behavior expected of a professional
accountant
- the code provides a conceptual framework as well that professional accountants are to apply in order to
identify, evaluate, and address threats to compliance with the fundamental principles
- the code sets out requirements and application material and various topics to help accountants apply the
framework to those topics
- the code is structured in four parts
- complying with the code fundamental principles and conceptual framework
Course Outline
● Lesson 1: Complying with the Code
● Lesson 2: The Fundamentals Principles
● Lesson 3: The Conceptual Framework
● A professional accountant shall comply with the International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants
(“Code”)
● A breaches of any provision requires a determination of significance of the breach and impact on the
accountant's ability to comply with the fundamental principles
● The accountant shall also:
○ Take whatever actions that might be available to address the consequences of the breach
satisfactorily; and
○ Determine whether to report the breach to the relevant parties
■ Who are these relevant parties to whom the accountant must report said breaches?
● we have those who might have been affected by the breach
● so, the accountant must make knowns and preach to those that may be affected
and the accountant must also report it to a professional or regulatory body or an
oversight authority
● all professional accountants must comply with the code
FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES
1. Integrity
2. Objectivity
3. Professional Competence and Due Care
4. Confidentiality
5. Professional Behavior
1. Integrity
● integrity means to be straightforward and honest in all professional and business relationships
2. Objectivity
● Objectivity means not to compromise professional or business judgments because of any bias, conflict of
interest or undue influence of others
○ in all professional activity by the accountant, you must act objectively
4. Confidentiality
● Respect and confidentiality or of information acquired as a result of professional and business relationships
5. Professional Behavior
● Comply with relevant laws and regulations and avoid any conduct that the professional accountant knows or
should know might discredit the profession.
○ so it's about maintaining that behavior ideal to that of an accountant
○ Exaggerated claims for the services offered by, or the qualifications or experience of, the
accountant; or
○ Disparaging references or unsubstantiated comparisons to the work of others
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
The conceptual framework which would help the professional accountant to identify threats to compliance with the
fundamental principles, evaluate these threats, and address the threats by eliminating or reducing them to an
acceptable level.
● Make informed decisions about courses of actions available, and to determine whether such decisions are
appropriate in the circumstances.
- So, if there is reason to be concerned that potentially relevant information might be missing from
the facts and circumstances known to the accountant then, we may choose to or there may be
threats to the compliance of the fundamental principles
- Also, in engaging a client if you already you should have already studied that said client or for any
engagement you should have studied the said engagement
- If there is an inconsistency between the known facts and circumstances delivered by the client or
the engagement and to your expectations -> if there is an inconsistency with what is being provided
to you and what you had expected then there may be something wrong so, again be on guard
- if you've determined that this would be the best course of action or this decision is best -> try to
apply the reasonable and informed third party set test
- meaning if a third party who has the same information you have, who is an informed third
party
- would he or she make the same decision
- would he or she come to the same conclusion
- so, if not then there may be something wrong but if yes then it would it may look
like you're going the right path
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
● The conceptual framework specifies an approach for a professional accountant to:
○ identify threats
○ evaluate threats
○ address the threats
A. Identifying Threats
1. self-interest threat
2. self-review threat
3. advocacy threat
4. familiarity threat
5. intimidation threat
- in identifying the threats there is a need to understand the facts and circumstances
- understanding the facts and circumstances are important for us to make a
decision
- there is a need to understand the facts and circumstances that might
compromise compliance with the fundamental principles
- the existence of certain conditions policies and procedures established by the profession,
legislation, regulation, the firm, or the employing organization that can enhance the
accountant ethically might also identify help identify threats to compliance
1. Self-interest
● is the threat that a financial or other interests will inappropriately influence a professional
accountant's judgment or behavior
● so meaning there is a financial or other interests that may drive you, that may influence you to
perform a breach of the code
● for example: you are invited or approached by a company for an audit engagement so, you later
figured out that said company is one of the companies being held by a holding company which you
are invested in -> so you have a financial or other interest that may influence you in auditing this
subsidiary company
○ you have to be careful
○ so, once you've taken note of that, once you've established that you are financially
interested in that company there is a self interest
2. Self-review
● the threat that a professional accountant will not appropriately evaluate the results of a previous
judgment made or an activity performed by same accountant or by another individual within the
accountant's firm or employing organization on which the accountant will rely when forming a
judgment as part of performing a current activity
○ For example: In 2020, XYZ company approached you to give an advice on a specific
accounting treatment for lease of printers or other office equipment
■ as a professional accountant you form related advice -> this should be based on
existing standards accounting standards “this is how you treat a lease of office
equipment” -> then you laid out your opinion and your advice
■ In 2021, the same company but different management approached you and
asked how to treat the lease of the same office equipment and then you were
asked to review your own work (so that is a self review threat)
■ or in another way, if the one that performed or the one that made their made the
advice was another person within your firm (there is a self review threat) —
because you would be afraid to contradict what was written on the first advice
because
● you're the one who made it or
● a person within your firm made it
3. Advocacy Threat
● threat that a professional accountant will promote a client's or the employing organization's
possession to the point that the accountant's objectivity is compromised
○ so you are bending to the will of the client or the employing organization because for the
better reasons (you like the client, you like what the client's doing, the client's purpose is)
-> so your objectivity may have been compromised
4. Familiarity Threat
● A threat that due to a long or close relationship with a client or employing organization a
professional accountant will be too sympathetic to their interests or too accepting of their work
○ so this is a common in practice when you have a long-term client so this client has been
engaging you for 3-4 years
○ management personnel are already close to you, you already play golf like once a month,
you've established relationships with them, and then one day you figured out that they
they had something wrong in their books-> there may be a risk that you will turn a blind
eye on these errors because of a familiarity threat
5. Intimidation
● A threat that an accountant would be deferred from acting objectively because of actual or
perceived pressures including attempts or exercise of undue influence over the accountant
○ so you are prevented from doing your duty — prevented from complying with the code
because of intimidation or actual or perceived pressures
○ you've prepared a negative opinion about the client's books and then the client would
spread during a meeting that “maybe we will no longer engage your services in the future”
■ there is perceived pressure on your side that if you pursue or if you go along with
the negative opinion you have on the client's books then you will lose a client in
the future
B. Evaluating Threats
● When the threat is identified, the accountant shall evaluate whether such a threat is at an acceptable level
○ meaning not all threats will be eliminated but if it’s at an acceptable level then you can still
personally engage
- for example: if you have an interest over the company that you are currently engaged in now you're
providing services for them but your interest is only .001 of the total shares of the company
- it may be minimal but still it doesn't mean that you don't identify just because it is at an
acceptable level
- you still have to identify it and explain that it's minimal
Acceptable level
● This is the level at which a professional accountant using the reasonable informed third-party test
would likely conclude that the accountant complies with the fundamental principles
● If the professional becomes aware of new information or changes in facts and circumstances that
might impact whether a threat has been eliminated or reduced to an acceptable level, the
accountant shall re-evaluate and address that threat accordingly
○ if at the beginning of the engagement there is a threat and during the engagement it was
reduced or eliminated then we shall re-evaluate
C. Addressing Threats
● Eliminate the circumstance therefore eliminating the threat
● Applying safeguards to eliminate the threat or reduce it at an acceptable level
● Declining or ending the specific professional activity
- if the professional accountant determines remains that the identified threats to compliance are not
at acceptable level of course → the accountant shall address the threats by eliminating them or
reducing them to an acceptable level
- What are actions to eliminate the threats?
- a threat might be addressed by eliminating the circumstance creating the threat however,
there are some situations in which threats can only be addressed by declining or ending
the specific activity -> this is because the circumstance that created the threats cannot
be eliminated and safeguards are not capable of being applied
- What are safeguards? safeguards are actions, individually or in combination, that the
professional accountant takes that effectively reduce threats to compliance with the
fundamental principles to an acceptable level
A. Independence
- you are independent because you have no bias against a certain engagement
- Example: An accountant is married to X. X’s father owns a company. The company is being audited
by the accountant.
- In that instance, you can argue upon yourself that you are independent on your own. You
are objective in doing your work because you can say you're not really close with your
father-in-law who owns the company.
- But in other people's eyes, although there may be independence of the mind, there is no
independence in appearance because you're still connected with the company because
you're married to the daughter of the owner of the company. So, there may be discussions
behind the scenes. There is a breach of independence in appearance.
Independence in appearance
● the avoidance of facts and circumstances that are so significant that a reasonable and informed
third party would be likely to conclude that a firm’s or an audit or assurance team member’s
integrity, objectivity, or professional skepticism has been compromised
B. Professional skepticism
● Under auditing, review and other assurance standards, professional accountants in public practice are
required to exercise professional skepticism when planning and performing audits, reviews and other
assurance engagements
● Professional skepticism and the fundamental principles that are described previously are interrelated
concepts.
- meaning the five principles (integrity, objectivity, competence and due care, confidentiality and
professional behavior) are under the exercise of professional skepticism
https://www.ifac.org/system/files/publications/files/IESBA-Handbook-Code-of-Ethics-2018.pdf
Discuss: Salient provision of international code of ethics for professional accounts and provide perspectives
Introduction
200.3 A professional accountant in business might be an employee, contractor, partner, director (executive
or non-executive), owner-manager, or volunteer of an employing organization.The legal form of the
relationship of the accountant with the employing organization has no bearing on the ethical responsibilities
placed on the accountant.
○ Employee – whether you engage inn employer-employee relationship
○ Contractor – if you have a contract partner
Professional accountants in business might solely or jointly be responsible for the preparation and
reporting of financial and other information.
● Financial – FS
● Other information – notes, that might be related to the organization
On which both employing organizations (company) and third parties (investors, creditors, suppliers,
government, and such) might rely. They might also be responsible for providing effective financial
management and competent advise on a variety of business related matters.
The legal form of the relationship of the accountant and the employing organization has no bearing
on the ethical responsibilities placed on the accountant.
● Example. Employee of the organization or employee of third party (outsource of the
organization to perform responsibilities for the preparation of financial and non-financial
information) – it does not have a bearing on the organization/
Fundamental Principles
1. Integrity – quality of being honest or having a strong moral principle, moral uprightness
2. Objectivity – not influenced by personal feelings or opinions in considering and representing facts.
Not being subjective.
3. Professional competence and due care – obligation that members of the professional bodies
maintain their knowledge and skill at level required
4. Professional behavior – requires to comply with relevant laws and regulations. Avoid any conduct
that might discredit the profession.
5. Principle of Confidentiality – respect the confidentiality of the information acquired as a result of
a professional and business relationship.
● To the extent that they are able to do so, taking into account their position and seniority in the
organization, accountants are expected to encourage and promote an ethics-based culture in the
organization.
o The more senior the accountant is, the greater will be the ability to influence and access to
information so you can influence the policies, decisions made and actions taken by others
involving with the employing organization. As such, we are kind of encouraged to promote
ethics based culture to our respective organization.
Example: We can achieve this through introduction, implementation, and oversight of the following:
1. Ethics Education and Training Programs – specific point of contact in your department
1. Ethics and Whistleblowing Policies – act with participation in creating of related policies on
ethics and whistleblowing policies
2. Policies and Procedures Design to Prevent Noncompliance with laws and regulations –
active participation in creation of a related policies on compliance to laws and regulation take for
example, privacy laws and other relevant laws to the organization.
● Self-review threats – something that you did or you perform a work on for example, when a
professional accountant, determining the appropriate accounting treatment for a business
combination after performing the feasibility studies supporting the purchase decision.
● Advocacy threats – something you are an advocate or in line with what you are supporting for
example, when a professional accountant having the opportunity to manipulate information in a
prospectus in order to obtain favorable financing.
● Familiarity threats – when you have a close ties or long association with an individual, for
example, when a professional accountant, being responsible for the financial reporting of an
organization, when an immediate or close family member employed by the organization makes
decision that affect the financial reporting of that organization
● Intimidation threats – there is exercise of influence, inducing fear, for example, when an individual
attempting to influence the decision-making process of the professional accountant with regards of
awarding of contracts for the application of an accounting principle
● Self-interest threats – when you have financial interests in one’s personal interest is at an
advantage, for example, a professional accountant would bring a financial interest on receiving a
loan or guarantee from the employing organization or as well as when they participate in incentive
compensation arrangement offered by the employing organization
Requirements And Application Material: Communicating With Those Charged With Governance
R200.9 When communicating with those charged with governance in accordance with the code, a
professional accountant shall determine the appropriate individual(s) within the employing organization's
governance structure with whom to communicate. If the accountant communicates with a subgroup of those
charged with governance, the accountant shall determine whether communication with all of those charged
with governance is also necessary so that they are adequately informed.
Introduction
210.1 Professional accountants are required to comply with the fundamental principles and apply the
conceptual framework set out in Section 120 to identify, evaluate and address threats.
210.2 A conflict of interest creates threats to compliance with the principle of objectivity and might create
threats to compliance with other fundamental principles.
o Such threats can be created when a professional accountant undertakes a professional activity
related to a particular matter for two or more parties whose interest with respect to that matter are
in conflict (subject as the conflict).
o The interest of a professional accountant with respect to a particular matter and the interest of a
party for whom the accountant undertakes a professional activity related to that matter are in
conflict (interest of the professional and interest of the party are in conflict).
2. Responsible for selecting a vendor. For the employing organization, when an immediate family
member of the accountant might benefit financially from the transaction. Why? Favorable terms
might be given to that immediate family member if the professional would be the one responsible in
the selection of the vendor for the organization.
3. Serving in a governance capacity in an employing organization that is approving certain
investments for the company where one of those investments will increase the value of the
investment portfolio of the accountant or an immediate family member.
- Serving in a governance capacity in an employing organization that is (??) investment
portfolio of an accountant or an immediate family member. Why? Potential bias over
approvals of certain investments, and personal gain might happen that is why there is
conflict of interest.
o Example is whether you will personally gain, or you immediate relatives/related parties
were directly benefiting with the conduct of activity or undertaking. (Ex. You have a relative
that have stocks, and of you conduct the activity, their stock prices will increase)
R210.6 A professional accountant shall remain alert to changes over time in the nature of the activities,
interests and relationships that might create a conflict of interest while performing a professional activity.
Example: Professional undertaking where you are evaluating the preparation of a merger between two
organizations, and you have interests in those two companies. To eliminate the conflict of interest, you will
only be assigned to the paperwork and others will be assigned for evaluation.
Other examples:
1. Restructuring or segregating certain responsibilities and duties
- Example: Be preparers instead of making the decision, evaluation or review obtaining appropriate
oversight on acting under the supervision of an executive or non-executive director.
Other considerations:
When addressing a conflict of interest, the professional accountant is encouraged to seek guidance from within the
employing organization or from others, such as a professional body, legal counsel or another accountant, when
making such disclosures or sharing information within the employing organization and seeking guidance of third
parties the principle of confidentiality applies.
● When you are seeking guidance to another party, you have to consider that there is a confidentiality
scheme in you professional undertaking.
220.2 Preparing or presenting information might create a self-interest, intimidation or other threats to
compliance with one or more of the fundamental principles. This section sets out specific requirements and
application material relevant to applying the conceptual framework in such circumstances.
220.3 A2 Stakeholders to whom, or for whom, such information is prepared or presented, include:
o Management and those charged with governance
o Regulatory bodies.
o Investors and lenders or other creditors.
This information might assist stakeholders in understanding and evaluating aspects of the employing
organization’s state of affairs and in making decisions concerning the organization. Information can include
financial and non-financial information that might be made public or used for internal purposes.
Examples include:
● Operating and performance reports – Financial information containing operational or performance
reports (Income Statements)
● Decision support analyses. – Notes to FS, disclosure in estimates, etc.
● Budgets and forecasts – used by management
● Information provided to the internal and external auditors – supporting documents on preparation of
FS, external auditors would rely for operating effectiveness of controls
● Risk analyses
● General and special purpose financial statements.
● Tax returns
● Reports filed with regulatory bodies for legal and compliance purposes
● Prepare or present the information in accordance with a relevant reporting framework, where applicable;
o PH – PFRS
o US – US GAAP
● Prepare or present the information in a manner that is intended neither to mislead nor to influence
contractual or regulatory outcomes inappropriately;
o Using professional judgement aligned to make the FS presented fairly
● Exercise professional judgment to:
o Represent the facts accurately and completely in all material respects;
o Describe clearly the true nature of business transactions or activities; and
o Classify and record information in a timely and proper manner; and
▪ We need supporting documentation and sufficient evidences for us to use our professional
judgment
● Not omit anything with the intention of rendering the information misleading or of influencing contractual or
regulatory outcomes inappropriately
o Influencing an contractual or regulatory outcome inappropriately using an unrealistic estimate with
intention of avoiding violation of contractual requirement such as a debt covenant or of a regulatory
requirement such as a capital requirement for a financial institution.
220.5 A1 Examples of ways in which discretion might be misused to achieve inappropriate outcomes
include:
● Determining estimates, for example, determining fair value estimates in order to misrepresent profit
or loss.
o Since estimates would require our professional judgment, there are controls around this
like sufficient and appropriate documentation to support our analysis and determination
● Selecting or changing an accounting policy or method among two or more alternatives permitted
under the applicable financial reporting framework, for example, selecting a policy for accounting
for long-term contracts in order to misrepresent profit or loss.
o We have accounting method whether we use zero profit percentage of completion among
long term construction contracts which allows us to use alternatives that can be both
permitted under the standards
● When performing professional activities, especially those that do not require compliance with a
relevant reporting framework, the professional accountant shall exercise professional judgment to
identify and consider:
o The purpose for which the information is to be used:
o The context within which it is given; and
o The audience to whom it is addressed,
Example: When preparing or presenting pro forma reports, budgets or forecasts, the inclusion of relevant
estimates, approximations and assumptions, where appropriate, would enable those who might rely on such
information to form their own judgments.
● They have to understand whether the financial information will be used for decision making of our
creditors, investors, or be used by internal management. Then we incorporate professional
judgement in determining the level of disclosures our assumptions or estimates, for those who will
ultimately rely on the reports that we are going to generate.
Such information might be gained from prior association with, or from consulting others about, the other individual or
organization.
● Example: I am a CIA guided by IAA Code of Ethics, IT Professional guided on ISACA Code of Ethics
● Professional accountants are required to comply with the fundamental principles and apply the conceptual
framework set out in section 120 to identify, evaluate and address threats.
● Acting without sufficient expertise creates a self-interest threat to compliance with the principle of
professional competence and due care. This section sets out specific requirements and application material
relevant to applying the conceptual framework in such circumstances.
… due care, this section provides an overview and considerations when an professional is acting with sufficient
expertise.
General:
● A professional accountant shall not intentionally mislead an employing organization as to the level of
expertise or experience possessed.
o Example: I cannot say I am not expert on Valuation when my expertise is on IT.
● A self-interest threat to compliance with the principle of professional competence and due care might be
created if a professional accountant has:
o Insufficient time for performing or completing the relevant duties.
▪ Due care that we are providing conclusion based on sufficient and appropriate evidence
which might be tainted without adequate time to perform procedures
o Incomplete, restricted or otherwise inadequate information for performing the duties.
▪ Due care that we are providing conclusion based on sufficient and appropriate evidence
which can be hindered by incomplete access or inadequate access to perform our
procedures.
o Inadequate experience, training and/or education.
▪ Professional competence whether we have the necessary skills based from our training,
education, experience as well.
o Inadequate resources for the performance of the duties.
▪ Due care, to ensure that we perform our duties diligently and adequate resources are
provided for us to perform our procedures.
General (Cont.):
● If a threat to compliance with the principle of professional competence and due care cannot be addressed, a
professional accountant shall determine whether to decline to perform the duties in question. If the
accountant determines that declining is appropriate, the accountant shall communicate the reasons.
● Professional accountants are required to comply with the fundamental principles and apply the conceptual
framework set out in Section 120 to identify, evaluate and address threats.
● Having a financial interest or knowing of a financial interest held by an immediate or close family member
might create a self-interest threat to compliance with the principles of objectivity or confidentiality. This
section sets out specific requirements and application material relevant to applying the conceptual
framework in such circumstances.
Since we need to apply Section 120 to identify threats, such as self-interest threats on having financial interest or
knowing of a financial interest held by an immediate or close family member which may create self-interest threat to
compliance with the principles of objectivity, confidentiality.
Another circumstances that might create self-interest threat includes situation in which the professional accountant or
an immediate close member:
- Has a motive and opportunity to manipulate price-sensitive information in order to gain financially.
o Example: Person could manipulate stock price of a certain stock when the person or immediate
family member has shares
- Holds a direct or indirect financial interest in the employing organization and the value of that financial
interest might be directly affected by decisions made by the accountant.
o The financial interest can be affected directly via the results of the financial reporting information
- Eligibility for a profit-related bonus and the value of that bonus might be directly affected by decisions made
by the accountant.
- Holds, directly or indirectly, deferred bonus share rights or share options in the employing organization, the
value of which might be affected by decisions made by the accountant.
o Immediate family member is a manager of a company where the bonus is dependent to profit or
other metrics that can be affected by accountant’s judgment in terms of reporting information
- Participates in compensation arrangements which provide incentives to achieve targets or to support efforts
to maximize the value of the employing organization’s shares.
o An example of such an arrangement might be through participation in incentive plans which are
linked to certain performance conditions being met.
o Compensation is directly related to the sales/share price.
● Professional accountants might have financial interests or might know of financial interests of immediate or
close family members that, in certain circumstances, might create threats to compliance with the
fundamental principles. Financial interests include those arising from compensation or incentive
arrangements linked to financial reporting and decision making.
Example: In an auditing firm, there will be times where you will disclose your financial interest or whether you have
family that has financial interest in order to ensure that you are independent and objective in auditing the FS.
(annually)
Introduction
250.1 Professional accountants are required to comply with the fundamental principles and apply the
conceptual framework set out in Section 120 to identify, evaluate and address threats.
250.2 Offering or accepting inducements might create a self-interest, familiarity or intimidation threat to
compliance with the fundamental principles, particularly the principles of integrity, objectivity and
professional behavior.
● honest - high moral principles
● objectivity - not being subjective or not being persuaded by opinion
250.3 This section sets out requirements and application material relevant to applying the conceptual
framework in relation to the offering and accepting of inducements when undertaking professional activities
that do not constitute non-compliance with laws and regulations. This section also requires a professional
accountant to comply with relevant laws and regulations when offering or accepting inducements.
Two parts:
● Minor acts can be considered as inducements which are not within the noncompliance with laws
and regulations or does not constitute noncompliance with laws and regulations
● An inducement can take many different forms
○ Gifts - gaming laptop
○ hospitality - if you are an accounting staff and you will be provided a first class check in
experience to the hotel you are auditing
○ entertainment- given the access to play unlimited golf or bowling
○ political or charitable donations - contributions to campaign funds
○ Appeals to friendship and loyalty.
○ Employment or other commercial opportunities.
○ Preferential treatment, rights or privileges.
Inducements Not Prohibited by Laws and Regulations - With Intent to Improperly Influence
R250.6 A1 The offering or accepting of inducements that is not prohibited by laws and regulations might still
create threats to compliance with the fundamental principles.
● Some laws and regulations probably will not be able to outline all related matters that
create threat to the fundamental principles
● Professional accountants should not accept because it is intent to improperly influence
- R250.8 A professional accountant shall not accept, or encourage others to accept, any inducement that the
accountant concludes is made, or considers a reasonable and informed third party would be likely to
conclude is made, with the intent to improperly influence the behavior of the recipient or of another
individual.
- 250.9 A1 An inducement is considered as improperly influencing an individual’s behavior if it causes the
individual to act in an unethical manner. Such improper influence can be directed either towards the recipient
or towards another individual who has some relationship with the recipient. The fundamental principles are
an appropriate frame of reference for a professional accountant in considering what constitutes unethical
behavior on the part of the accountant and, if necessary by analogy, other individuals.
- 250.9 A2 A breach of the fundamental principle of integrity arises when a professional accountant offers or
accepts, or encourages others to offer or accept, an inducement where the intent is to improperly influence
the behavior of the recipient or of another individual.
R250.9 A3 The determination of whether there is actual or perceived intent to improperly influence behavior
requires the exercise of professional judgment. Relevant factors to consider might include:
250.10 A2 Examples of actions that might be safeguards to address such threats include:
● Informing senior management or those charged with governance of the employing organization of
the professional accountant or the offeror regarding the offer.
● Amending or terminating the business relationship with the offeror.
- inform the board or the audit committee of such matters
Inducements Not Prohibited by Laws and Regulations - Without Intent to Improperly Influence
250.11 A1 The requirements and application material set out in the conceptual framework apply when a
professional accountant has concluded there is no actual or perceived intent to improperly influence the
behavior of the recipient or of another individual.
- it happens when such inducement is trivial and inconsequential, no material value, the frequency is
not intended for them to improperly influence us to be not objective or violate the fundamental
principles
250.11 A3 Examples of circumstances where offering or accepting such an inducement might create threats
even if the professional accountant has concluded there is no actual or perceived intent to improperly
influence behavior include:
● Self-interest threats: A professional accountant is offered part-time employment by a vendor.
● Familiarity threats: A professional accountant regularly takes a customer or supplier to sporting
events.
● Intimidation threats; A professional accountant accepts hospitality, the nature of which could be
perceived to be inappropriate were it to be publicly disclosed.
250.11 A5 Examples of actions that might eliminate threats created by offering or accepting such an
inducement include:
● Declining or not offering the inducement.
● Transferring responsibility for any business-related decision involving the counterparty to another
individual who the professional accountant has no reason to believe would be, or would be
perceived to be, improperly influenced in making the decision.
250.11 A6 Examples of actions that might be safeguards to address such threats created by offering or
accepting such an inducement include:
● Being transparent with senior management or those charged with governance of the employing
organization of the professional accountant or of the counterparty about offering or accepting an
inducement.
- made aware of your board of directors that you are going to receive a gift (it can but it may
not still address the threats)
● Registering the inducement in a log maintained by the employing organization of the accountant or
the counterparty.
- some organizations have the mechanism that you will register the gifts you would receive
to monitor whether there is a breach or if it’s okay to accept those gifts
● Having an appropriate reviewer, who is not otherwise involved in undertaking the professional
activity, reviews any work performed or decisions made by the accountant with respect to the
individual or organization from which the accountant accepted the inducement.
● Donating the inducement to charity after receipt and appropriately disclosing the donation, for
example, to those charged with governance or the individual who offered the inducement.
● Reimbursing the cost of the inducement, such as hospitality, received.
● As soon as possible, returning the inducement, such as a gift, after it was initially accepted.
- received substantial material amount of money considered as a gift but as a way to
safeguard or mitigate the threats to -> return the gift that was initially accepted
Other Considerations
250.15 A1 If a professional accountant is offered an inducement by the employing organization relating to
financial interests, compensation and incentives linked to performance, the requirements and application
material set out in Section 240 apply.
250.15 A2 If a professional accountant encounters or is made aware of inducements that might result in
non-compliance or suspected non-compliance with laws and regulations by other individuals working for or
under the direction of the employing organization, the requirements and application material set out in
Section 260 apply.
250.15 A3 If a professional accountant faces pressure to offer or accept inducements that might create
threats to compliance with the fundamental principles, the requirements and application material set out in
Section 270 apply.
Introduction
260.1 Professional accountants are required to comply with the fundamental principles and apply the
conceptual framework set out in Section 120 to identify, evaluate and address threats.
260.2 A self-interest or intimidation threat to compliance with the principles of integrity and professional
behavior is created when a professional accountant becomes aware of non-compliance or suspected
noncompliance with laws and regulations
260.3 A professional accountant might encounter or be made aware of non- compliance or suspected
non-compliance in the course of carrying out professional activities. This section guides the accountant in
assessing the implications of the matter and the possible courses of action when responding to
non-compliance or suspected non-compliance with:
a. Laws and regulations generally recognized to have a direct effect on the determination of material
amounts and disclosures in the employing organization’s financial statements; and
b. Other laws and regulations that do not have a direct effect on the determination of the amounts and
disclosures in the employing organization’s financial statements, but compliance with which might
be fundamental to the operating aspects of the employing organization’s business, to its ability to
continue its business, or to avoid material penalties.
- bribery
- corruption
- privacy laws
Objectives of the Professional Accountant in Relation to Non-compliance with Laws and Regulations
260.4 A distinguishing mark of the accountancy profession is its acceptance of the responsibility to act in the
public interest. When responding to non-compliance or suspected non-compliance, the objectives of the
professional accountant are:
A. To comply with the principles of integrity and professional behavior;
- integrity means that you are honest and have high moral values
B. By alerting management or, where appropriate, those charged with governance of the employing
organization, to seek to:
a. Enable them to rectify, remediate or mitigate the consequences of the identified or
suspected non- compliance; or
b. Deter the non-compliance where it has not yet occurred; and
C. To take such further action as appropriate in the public interest.
- Alert the appropriate management for them to rectify and deter the noncompliance
260.5 A2 Examples of laws and regulations which this section addresses include those that deal with:
● Fraud, corruption and bribery.
● Money laundering, terrorist financing and proceeds of crime.
● Securities markets and trading.
● Banking and other financial products and services.
● Data protection.
● Tax and pension liabilities and payments.
● Environmental protection.
● Public health and safety.
260.5 A3 Non-compliance might result in fines, litigation or other consequences for the employing
organization, potentially materially affecting its financial statements. Importantly, such non-compliance might
have wider public interest implications in terms of potentially substantial harm to investors, creditors,
employees or the general public. For the purposes of this section, non-compliance that causes substantial
harm is one that results in serious adverse consequences to any of these parties in financial or non-financial
terms. Examples include the perpetration of a fraud resulting in significant financial losses to investors, and
breaches of environmental laws and regulations endangering the health or safety of employees or the
public.
- There is a lot of risk like financial risk, compliance risk, and reputational risk related to
noncompliance with laws and regulations
- Financial terms: fines
- Nonfinancial: loss of reputation
Responsibilities of the Employing Organization’s Management and Those Charged with Governance
260.8 A1 The employing organization’s management, with the oversight of those charged with governance,
is responsible for ensuring that the employing organization’s business activities are conducted in
accordance with laws and regulations. Management and those charged with governance are also
responsible for identifying and addressing any non-compliance by:
260.9 A1 Many employing organizations have established protocols and procedures regarding how to raise
non-compliance or suspected noncompliance internally. These protocols and procedures include, for
example, an ethics policy or internal whistle-blowing mechanism. Such protocols and procedures might
allow matters to be reported anonymously through designated channels.
R260.10 Where a professional accountant becomes aware of a matter to which this section applies, the
steps that the accountant takes to comply with this section shall be taken on a timely basis. For the purpose
of taking timely steps, the accountant shall have regard to the nature of the matter and the potential harm to
the interests of the employing organization, investors, creditors, employees or the general public.
- there is a breach of privacy laws a you have made aware, before the effect (fines, loss of
reputation) the accountant shall act in a timely manner to address those
Documentation
260.23 A1 In relation to non-compliance or suspected non-compliance that falls within the scope of this
section, the senior professional accountant is encouraged to have the following matters documented:
● The matter.
- situation, happening, explanation of the matter
● The results of discussions with the accountant’s superiors, if any, and those charged with
governance and other parties.
● How the accountant’s superiors, if any, and those charged with governance have responded to the
matter.
● The courses of action the accountant considered, the judgments made and the decisions that were
taken.
● How the accountant is satisfied that the accountant has fulfilled the responsibility set out in
paragraph R260.17
270.3 A3 Factors that are relevant in evaluating the level of threats created by pressure include:
● The intent of the individual who is exerting the pressure and the nature and extent of the pressure.
● The application of laws, regulations, and professional standards to the circumstances.
● The culture and leadership of the employing organization including the extent to which they reflect
or emphasize the importance of ethical behavior and the expectation that employees will act
ethically. For example, a corporate culture that tolerates unethical behavior might increase the
likelihood that the pressure would result in a threat to compliance with the fundamental principles.
● Policies and procedures, if any, that the employing organization has established, such as ethics or
human resources policies that address pressure
270.3 A1 A professional accountant might face pressure that creates threats to compliance with the
fundamental principles, for example an intimidation threat, when undertaking a professional activity.
Pressure might be explicit or implicit and might come from:
● Within the employing organization, for example, from a colleague or superior.
● An external individual or organization such as a vendor, customer or lender.
● Internal or external targets and expectations.
270.3 A2 Examples of pressure that might result in threats to compliance with the fundamental principles
include:
● Section 210, Conflicts of Interest — Pressure related to conflicts of interest
● Section 220, Preparation and Presentation of Information — Pressure to influence preparation or
presentation of information
● Section 230, Acting with Sufficient Expertise — Pressure to act without sufficient expertise or due
care
● Section 240, Financial Interests, Compensation and Incentives Linked to Financial Reporting and
Decision Making — Pressure related to financial interests
● Section 250, Inducements, Including Gifts and Hospitality — Pressure related to inducements
● Section 260, Responding to Non-compliance with Laws and Regulations — Pressure related to
non-compliance with laws and regulations
270.3 A3 Factors that are relevant in evaluating the level of threats created by pressure include:
● The intent of the individual who is exerting the pressure and the nature and extent of the pressure.
- Are they forcing us?
● The application of laws, regulations, and professional standards to the circumstances.
● The culture and leadership of the employing organization including the extent to which they reflect
or emphasize the importance of ethical behavior and the expectation that employees will act
ethically. For example, a corporate culture that tolerates unethical behavior might increase the
likelihood that the pressure would result in a threat to compliance with the fundamental principles.
● Policies and procedures, if any, that the employing organization has established, such as ethics or
human resources policies that address pressure.
Documentation
270.4 A1 The professional accountant is encouraged to document:
● The facts.
● The communications and parties with whom these matters were discussed.
● The courses of action considered.
● How the matter was addressed
Approaches/Divisions
● Normative Ethics
○ Concerned with the rules in determining the right or ethical decision
given a situation
○ Includes certain theories in determining which decision is ethical.
○ Can be considered as something prescriptive (i.e., what a person ought
to do).
○ Context clue: norm as in rules.
● Metaethics
○ Deals with the fundamental definition, concepts, and statements
surrounding the concept of “what is good”.
○ Two most prominent issues concerning this subset are metaphysical
(i.e., the objective versus the relative) and psychological (e.g., gender
and ethics) concerns (Fieser, n.d.).
○ Context clue: meta as in beyond
● Applied Ethics
○ Concerned with the analysis of concrete and controversial issues.
○ Precepts in normative ethics are contextualized in controversial issues
such as euthanasia (bioethics), artificial intelligence (computer ethics),
and earnings management (accounting ethics).
○ Context clue: applied
Ethical (Normative) Theories
Utilitarianism Deontology Virtue Ethics
Strengths General good for Focus on duties and Focus on the human
everyone is rights person
promoted
Act
Norms are applied on a case-to-case basis
based on individual actions (e.g., act
utilitarianism and act deontology).
Module 1: Introduction to Professional
Values, Ethics and Attitude
Lesson 2: Ethics and the Accounting Profession
In this lesson, we have discussed the ethical foundations and requirements for the development
of professional accountants.
● Accountability to Society
○ Professional accountants have the responsibility to protect the
common good. They are made accountable for this responsibility
through regulation (self and professional).
Example: ethics,
professional skepticism,
professional judgment,
commitment to public
trust
Module 1: Introduction to Professional
Values, Ethics and Attitude
Lesson 3: Kohlberg’s Cognitive Moral Development
Paradigm
In this lesson, we have explained moral reasoning in line with Kohlberg’s CMD and criticized it
using Gilligan’s Ethics of Care.
What is the CMD paradigm It explains how individuals resolve ethical dilemmas
about? in a progressive and developmental manner.
What are the stages and the Level 1: Preconventional Stage 1: Avoid
levels? Decision-making is Punishment.
focused on the SELF.
What are the major Gilligan argues that the paradigm fails to capture the
criticisms of Kohlberg’s “feminine voice” due to the design of Kohlberg (i.e.,
CMD? interviewing male participants only). Furthermore,
Kohlberg’s CMD denotes the primacy of fairness and
justice over other principles.
What is the major argument In her seminal work, In a Different Voice, Gilligan
of Gilligan? argues that the female (feminist) ethics is anchored
on a care and response orientation. It means that the
female (feminist) ethics would focus on:
(1) withholding judgment until more facts are
known, and
(2) choosing the course of action in which no
one is harmed or at least harm is minimized.
What are the criticisms of As regards #1 and #2 above, Kohlberg denoted that
Gilligan’s Ethics of Care? such action encourages ethical relativism and trying
to please everyone (i.e., decision no one is harmed).
Advantages: Advantages:
Integrity-driven, Professional-driven, Easier to apply due to its precision
flexible, dynamic Little room for misunderstanding
Disadvantages: Disadvantages:
May be more subjective and Compliance-driven, mechanistic,
complicated to apply prescriptive.
Fundamental Principles
Objectivity “To not allow bias, conflict of Auditors should not have any
interest or undue influence of shares of the auditee to
others to override maintain their professional
professional or business (original) interest.
judgments”
Threats
Safeguards
These are general checks and balances These are specific checks and balances
put in place to ensure that accountants put in place to ensure that accountants
will adhere to the fundamental will adhere to the fundamental
principles and mitigate threats. principles and mitigate threats.
Basic Greatest benefit (over harm) Act according to your duty; Focus on the person’s
tenet for the most means over ends virtues as guide
number of people
Teleological and Nonconsequentialist
consequentialist
Reminders
● Metaphors are just devices to understand a reality; such must not be taken literally
● Metaphors are not mutually exclusive
Professional Development of Accountants
(Source:https://www.ifac.org/system/files/publications/files/Handbook-of-International-
EducationStandards-2019.pdf)
In which areas
When accountants are developed What are the levels of professional
accountants developed
professionally? development for accountants?
professionally?
Technical Competence
Application of professional
knowledge to a certain
level of performance
Example: International
Financial Reporting
Foundational Application of the
Standards, International
competence in environments with
Standards on Auditing,
LOW levels of ambiguity,
Tax Laws
complexity, and uncertainty.
Initial Professional Development
Professional Skills
Pertains to the aspiring professional Moderate Application of the
“Intellectual, interpersonal
accountant’s initial formation leading to competence in environments with
and communication,
performing the roles of a professional MODERATE levels of ambiguity,
personal, and
accountant; usually ends in the APA’s complexity, and uncertainty.
organizational skills”
membership to an IFAC member body
(e.g., after passing the After IPD, APAs are required to
Example: critical thinking,
certification/licensure exams) have a moderate level of
communication, time
professional competence for all
management, leadership
Continuing Professional Development domains except for one (Technical
Learning and development which aim Professional Values, Competence -
to maintain and upgrade the skills of Ethics, and Attitude Economics[Foundational]).
the professional accountants Defining characteristics of
Advanced Application of the
PAs as members of a
competence in environments with
profession which includes
HIGH levels of ambiguity,
principles of good conduct
complexity, and uncertainty.
leading to professional
behavior
Example: ethics,
professional skepticism,
professional judgment,
commitment to public trust
line with the SPIRIT of the law, rather than its form.”
What are the major Gilligan argues that the paradigm fails to capture the “feminine voice” due to the
criticisms of design of Kohlberg (i.e., interviewing male participants only). Furthermore,
Kohlberg’s CMD? Kohlberg’s CMD denotes the primacy of fairness and justice over other principles.
In her seminal work, In a Different Voice, Gilligan argues that the female (feminist)
ethics is anchored on a care and response orientation. It means that the female
What is the major (feminist) ethics would focus on:
argument of
(1) withholding judgment until more facts are known, and
Gilligan?
(2) choosing the course of action in which no one is harmed or at least harm is
minimized.
What are the As regards #1 and #2 above, Kohlberg denoted that such action encourages
criticisms of ethical relativism and trying to please everyone (i.e., decision no one is harmed).
Gilligan’s Ethics of Recent literature also denotes that gender differences are not a significant
Care? determinant of ethical decision.
Principles-based: frameworks are presented to Rules-based: exact and precise prescriptions are to
be applied by the professional. be followed by the professional.
Advantages: Advantages:
Integrity-driven, Professional-driven, flexible, Easier to apply due to its precision Little room for
dynamic misunderstanding
Disadvantages:
Disadvantages:
May be more subjective and complicated to apply
Compliance-driven, mechanistic, prescriptive.
More difficult to defend in courts (legally)
The Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants is PRIMARILY (MORE) principles-based. However, it is
incorrect to say that there are no rules-based components in the Code (e.g., mandatory prohibitions
regardless of materiality levels).
“Obligation to comply with relevant laws and PAs should follow the rules governing
Professional
regulations and avoid any action that discredits conducting business amidst the
Behavior
the profession” COVID19 pandemic.
“To not allow bias, conflict of interest or undue Auditors should not have any shares of
Objectivity influence of others to override professional or the auditee to maintain their
business judgments” professional (original) interest.
Threats
Long and close association with Em, the auditor of A Company, has been auditing the
Familiarity client company for the last 10 years.
Threat Accountant becomes too Em’s judgment might be compromised due to the
sympathetic or too accepting relationship built with the client during the last decade.
Safeguards