The document discusses performance materiality and the revision of materiality during an audit. It states that performance materiality is set at an amount lower than materiality for the financial statements to reduce the risk that aggregate uncorrected misstatements exceed materiality. It also notes that materiality may need to be revised during the audit if circumstances change or if the auditor gains a better understanding of the entity through further audit procedures. For example, materiality may be revised if anticipated financial results used initially are likely to be substantially different than actual results.
The document discusses performance materiality and the revision of materiality during an audit. It states that performance materiality is set at an amount lower than materiality for the financial statements to reduce the risk that aggregate uncorrected misstatements exceed materiality. It also notes that materiality may need to be revised during the audit if circumstances change or if the auditor gains a better understanding of the entity through further audit procedures. For example, materiality may be revised if anticipated financial results used initially are likely to be substantially different than actual results.
The document discusses performance materiality and the revision of materiality during an audit. It states that performance materiality is set at an amount lower than materiality for the financial statements to reduce the risk that aggregate uncorrected misstatements exceed materiality. It also notes that materiality may need to be revised during the audit if circumstances change or if the auditor gains a better understanding of the entity through further audit procedures. For example, materiality may be revised if anticipated financial results used initially are likely to be substantially different than actual results.
The document discusses performance materiality and the revision of materiality during an audit. It states that performance materiality is set at an amount lower than materiality for the financial statements to reduce the risk that aggregate uncorrected misstatements exceed materiality. It also notes that materiality may need to be revised during the audit if circumstances change or if the auditor gains a better understanding of the entity through further audit procedures. For example, materiality may be revised if anticipated financial results used initially are likely to be substantially different than actual results.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2
A11.
In considering whether, in the specific circumstances of the entity, such classes of
transactions, account balances or disclosures exist, the auditor may find it useful to obtain an understanding of the views and expectations of those charged with governance and management. 10 PSA 320 (Revised and Redrafted) Performance Materiality (Ref: Para. 11) A12. Planning the audit solely to detect individually material misstatements overlooks the fact that the aggregate of individually immaterial misstatements may cause the financial statements to be materially misstated, and leaves no margin for possible undetected misstatements. Performance materiality (which, as defined, is one or more amounts) is set to reduce to an appropriately low level the probability that the aggregate of uncorrected and undetected misstatements in the financial statements exceeds materiality for the financial statements as a whole. Similarly, performance materiality relating to a materiality level determined for a particular class of transactions, account balance or disclosure is set to reduce to an appropriately low level the probability that the aggregate of uncorrected and undetected misstatements in that particular class of transactions, account balance or disclosure exceeds the materiality level for that particular class of transactions, account balance or disclosure. The determination of performance materiality is not a simple mechanical calculation and involves the exercise of professional judgment. It is affected by the auditor’s understanding of the entity, updated during the performance of the risk assessment procedures; and the nature and extent of misstatements identified in previous audits and thereby the auditor’s expectations in relation to misstatements in the current period. Revision as the Audit Progresses (Ref: Para. 12) A13. Materiality for the financial statements as a whole (and, if applicable, the materiality level or levels for particular classes of transactions, account balances or disclosures) may need to be revised as a result of a change in circumstances that occurred during the audit (for example, a decision to dispose of a major part of the entity’s business), new information, or a change in the auditor’s understanding of the entity and its operations as a result of performing further audit procedures. For example, if during the audit it appears as though actual financial results are likely to be substantially different from the anticipated period end financial results that were used initially to determine materiality for the financial statements as a whole, the auditor revises that materiality. Acknowledgment This PSA is based on International Standard on Auditing 320 (Revised and Redrafted), “Materiality in Planning and Performing an Audit,” issued by the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board. There are no significant differences between this PSA 320 (Revised and Redrafted) and ISA 320 (Revised and Redrafted). 11 PSA 320 (Revised and Redrafted) This PSA 320 (Revised and Redrafted), “Materiality in Planning and Performing an Audit,” was unanimously approved for adoption on October 27, 2008 by the members of the Auditing and Assurance Standards Council. Benjamin R. Punongbayan, Chairman Felicidad A. Abad Antonio P. Acyatan Erwin Vincent G. Alcala Froilan G. Ampil David L. Balangue Ma. Gracia F. Casals-Diaz Eliseo A. Fernandez Jaime P. Naranjo Ma. Cecilia F. Ortiz Nestorio C. Roraldo Joaquin P. Tolentino Editha O. Tuason Jaime E. Ysmael