DBM Mould Casting Indivisual Weights: Sample Weights Sample Weights

DBM MOULD CASTING INDIVISUAL WEIGHTS
Total Sample wt. 1200 Total Sample wt. 1200 Total Sample wt.
Bitumen % 3.5 Bitumen % 4 Bitumen %
Bitumen Wt. 42.0 Bitumen Wt. 48.0 Bitumen Wt.
Aggregate Wt. 1158.0 Aggregate Wt. 1152.0 Aggregate Wt.
Sieve JMF Cum. Wt Sample Weights Sieve JMF Cum. Wt Sample Weights Sieve JMF
37.5 100 1158 0 0 37.5 100 1152 0.00 0 37.5 100
26.5 93.6 1084 73.76 73.8 26.5 93.6 1079 73.38 73.4 26.5 93.6
19 81.93 949 135.49 209.3 19 81.93 944 134.78 208.2 19 81.93
13.2 71.14 824 124.95 334.2 13.2 71.14 820 124.30 332.5 13.2 71.14
4.75 47.32 548 275.84 610.0 4.75 47.32 545 274.41 606.9 4.75 47.32
2.36 33.18 384 163.74 773.8 2.36 33.18 382 162.89 769.8 2.36 33.18
0.3 12.42 144 240.40 1014.2 0.3 12.42 143 239.16 1008.9 0.3 12.42
0.075 4.05 47 96.92 1111.1 0.075 4.05 47 96.42 1105.3 0.075 4.05
Cement 23.16 1134.26 Cement 23.04 1128.38 Cement
Pan 23.74 Pan 23.62 Pan
Total Sample wt. 1158 1152
1200.0 1200.0
Total Sample wt. 1200 Total Sample wt. 1200 Total Sample wt.
Bitumen % 5.5 Bitumen % 6 Bitumen %
Bitumen Wt. 66.0 Bitumen Wt. 72.0 Bitumen Wt.
Aggregate Wt. 1134.0 Aggregate Wt. 1128.0 Aggregate Wt.
Sieve JMF Cum. Wt Sample Weights Sieve JMF Cum. Wt Sample Weights Sieve JMF
37.5 100 1134 0 0 37.5 100 1128 0 0 37.5 100
26.5 93.6 1062 72.2 72.2 26.5 93.6 1056 71.9 71.9 26.5 93.6
19 81.93 929 132.7 204.9 19 81.93 924 132.0 203.8 19 81.93
13.2 71.14 807 122.4 327.3 13.2 71.14 802 121.7 325.5 13.2 71.14
4.75 47.32 537 270.1 597.4 4.75 47.32 534 268.7 594.2 4.75 47.32
2.36 33.18 376 160.3 757.7 2.36 33.18 374 159.5 753.7 2.36 33.18
0.3 12.42 141 235.4 993.2 0.3 12.42 140 234.2 987.9 0.3 12.42
0.075 4.05 46 94.9 1088.1 0.075 4.05 46 94.4 1082.3 0.075 4.05
Cement 22.7 1110.75 Cement 22.6 1104.88 Cement
Pan 23.2 Pan 23.1 Pan
Total Sample wt. 1134 1128
1200.0 1200.0
1200
4.5
54.0
1146.0
Cum. Wt Sample Weights
1146 0 0
1073 73.00 73.0
939 134.08 207.1
815 123.65 330.7
542 272.98 603.7
380 162.04 765.8
142 237.91 1003.7
46 95.92 1099.6
22.92 1122.51
23.49
1146
1200.0
1200
6.5
78.0
1122.0
Cum. Wt Sample Weights
1122 0 0
1051 71.5 71.5
919 131.3 202.7
798 121.1 323.8
531 267.3 591.1
372 158.7 749.7
139 232.9 982.6
45 93.9 1076.6
22.4 1099.00
23.0
1122
1200.0
Package No. 14, Rehabilitation and Upgradation of Anda - Funda ( MDR )
DBM MIX DESIGN (GRADE-II)
Client : PWD Raipur (Chhattisgarh), ADB Project
Consultant : EGIS International Pvt. Ltd. JV with EGIS India CS Pvt. Ltd.
Contractor : AMAR - DRA ( J/V )

CHHATTISGARH STATE ROAD SECTOR DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
DBM INDIVIDUAL GRADATION GRADE-II
Lab Ref No : Sample No .01 Date of Sampling : 12/04/2016
Type of Material : 43-26 Date of Testing : 13/4/2016

Jointly
Source : Selud Crusher Sampled by :
Jointly
Location : Hot mix plant at Selud Tested by :
WEIGHT OF THE SAMPLE = ( W1 ) = 201 30145

SIEVE SIZE PERCENTAGE
PASSING
WEIGHT RETAINED CUM.Wt. RETAINED CUM. % RETAINED
( mm ) ( 100 - Col.4 ) REMARKS
( gms ) - W2 ( gms ) - W3 ( W3 /W1 X 100 )
1 2 3 4 5
37.5 0 0 0.00 100.00
26.5 13025 13025 43.21 56.79
19 14220 27245 90.38 9.62
13.2 1745 28990 96.17 3.83
4.75 _ _ _ _
2.36 _ _ _ _
0.3 _ _ _ _
0.075 _ _ _ _
For Contractor's Rep. For Consultant's Rep.


Jointly
Jointly

WEIGHT RETAINED CUM.Wt. RETAINED CUM. % RETAINED PASSING
( mm ) ( gms ) - W2 ( gms ) - W3 ( W3 /W1 X 100 ) ( 100 - Col.4 ) REMARKS
1 2 3 4 5
37.5 0 0 0.00 100.00
26.5 12085 12085 40.58 59.42
19 14256 26341 88.44 11.56
13.2 1902 28243 94.83 5.17
4.75 _ _ _ _
2.36 _ _ _ _
0.3 _ _ _ _
0.075 _ _ _ _


Jointly
Jointly
WEIGHT OF THE SAMPLE = ( W1 ) = 2 34256 grm

1 2 3 4 5
37.5 0 0 0.00 100.00
26.5 12475 12475 36.42 63.58
19 18456 30931 90.29 9.71
13.2 1523 32454 94.74 5.26
4.75 _ _ _ _
2.36 _ _ _ _
0.3 _ _ _ _
0.075 _ _ _ _

Source : Selud Crusher Sampled by : Jointly
Location : Hot mix plant at Selud Tested by : Jointly
WEIGHT OF THE SAMPLE = ( W1 ) = 221428746

1 2 3 4 5
37.5 0 0 0.00 100.00
26.5 13456 13456 46.81 53.19
19 12456 25912 90.14 9.86
13.2 1256 27168 94.51 5.49
4.75 _ _ _ _
2.36 _ _ _ _
0.3 _ _ _ _
0.075 _ _ _ _


Jointly
Jointly

1 2 3 4 5
37.5 0 0 0.00 100.00
26.5 13020 13020 43.22 56.78
19 13679 26699 88.63 11.37
13.2 2150 28849 95.76 4.24
4.75 _ _ _ _
2.36 _ _ _ _
0.3 _ _ _ _
0.075 _ _ _ _
8153
0
8067
0
8631
0
9315
0
19550
0

Jointly
Jointly

PASSING
( gms ) - W2 ( gms ) - W3 ( W3 /W1 X 100 )
1 2 3 4 5
37.5 0 0 0.00 100.00
26.5 58 58 0.26 99.74
19 3826 3884 17.54 82.46
13.2 7944 11828 53.42 46.58
4.75 9658 21486 97.04 2.96
2.36 _ _ _ _
0.3 _ _ _ _
0.075 _ _ _ _


Jointly
Jointly

1 2 3 4 5
37.5 0 0 0.00 100.00
26.5 75 75 0.31 99.69
19 4012 4087 16.64 83.36
13.2 10613 14700 59.85 40.15
4.75 9125 23825 97.01 2.99
2.36 _ _ _ _
0.3 _ _ _ _
0.075 _ _ _ _


Jointly
Jointly

1 2 3 4 5
37.5 0 0 0.00 100.00
26.5 55 55 0.28 99.72
19 3478 3533 18.16 81.84
13.2 7538 11071 56.90 43.10
4.75 7552 18623 95.71 4.29
2.36 _ _ _ _
0.3 _ _ _ _
0.075 _ _ _ _


1 2 3 4 5
37.5 0 0 0.00 100.00
26.5 85 85 0.33 99.67
19 4025 4110 15.80 84.20
13.2 10205 14315 55.03 44.97
4.75 10749 25064 96.36 3.64
2.36 _ _ _ _
0.3 _ _ _ _
0.075 _ _ _ _


Jointly
Jointly

1 2 3 4 5
37.5 0 0 0.00 100.00
26.5 68 68 0.29 99.71
19 3995 4063 17.16 82.84
13.2 9950 14013 59.18 40.82
4.75 8920 22933 96.85 3.15
2.36 _ _ _ _
0.3 _ _ _ _
0.075 _ _ _ _
CT
( MDR )
12/04/2016
14/4/2016
Jointly
Jointly
REMARKS
8153
For Consultant's Rep.

CT
( MDR )
12/04/2016
14/4/2016
Jointly
Jointly
REMARKS
8067
0 changed

CT
( MDR )
12/04/2016
14/4/2016
Jointly
Jointly
REMARKS
8631
0 changed

CT
( MDR )
12/04/2016
14/4/2016
Jointly
Jointly
REMARKS
9315
0
CT
( MDR )
12/04/2016
14/4/2016
Jointly
Jointly
REMARKS
19550
0 changed
0

Jointly
Jointly

PASSING
( mm ) ( 100 - Col.4 ) REMARK
( gms ) - W2 ( gms ) - W3 ( W3 /W1 X 100 )
1 2 3 4 5
37.5 0 0 0.0 100
26.5 0 0 0 100
19 0 0 0 100
13.2 0 0 0 100
4.75 9242 9242 76.86 23.14
2.36 1356 10598 88.13 11.87
0.3 _ _ _ _
0.075 _ _ _ _


Jointly
Jointly

1 2 3 4 5
37.5 0 0 0.0 100
26.5 0 0 0 100
19 0 0 0 100
13.2 0 0 0 100
4.75 7672 7672 80.02 19.98
2.36 725 8397 87.58 12.42
0.3 _ _ _ _
0.075 _ _ _ _


Jointly
Jointly

1 2 3 4 5
37.5 0 0 0.0 100
26.5 0 0 0 100
19 0 0 0 100
13.2 0 0 0 100
4.75 9356 9356 82.34 17.66
2.36 905 10261 90.30 9.70
0.3 _ _ _ _
0.075 _ _ _ _


1 2 3 4 5
37.5 0 0 0.0 100
26.5 0 0 0 100
19 0 0 0 100
13.2 0 0 0 100
4.75 11236 11236 78.78 21.22
2.36 962 12198 85.52 14.48
0.3 _ _ _ _
0.075 _ _ _ _


Jointly
Jointly

1 2 3 4 5
37.5 0 0 0.0 100
26.5 0 0 0 100
19 0 0 0 100
13.2 0 0 0 100
4.75 7654 7654 79.91 20.09
2.36 625 8279 86.44 13.56
0.3 _ _ _ _
0.075 _ _ _ _
CT
( MDR )
12/04/2016
15/4/2016
Jointly
Jointly
REMARK
8153

CT
( MDR )
12/04/2016
15/4/2016
Jointly
Jointly
REMARKS
8067

CT
( MDR )
12/04/2016
15/4/2016
Jointly
Jointly
REMARKS
8631

CT
( MDR )
12/04/2016
15/4/2016
Jointly
Jointly
REMARKS
9315
0
CT
( MDR )
12/04/2016
15/4/2016
Jointly
Jointly
REMARKS
19550
0
Type of Material : 6 Down Date of Testing : 16/4/2016

Jointly
Jointly

PASSING
( mm ) ( 100 - Col.4 ) REMARK
( gms ) - W2 ( gms ) - W3 ( W3 /W1 X 100 )
1 2 3 4 5
37.5 0 0 0 100
26.5 0 0 0 100
19 0 0 0 100
13.2 0 0 0 100
4.75 175 175 6.25 93.75
2.36 547 722 25.77 74.23
0.3 1075 1797 64.13 35.87
0.075 827 2624 93.65 6.35


Jointly
Jointly

( mm ) ( gms ) - W2 ( gms ) - W3 ( W3 /W1 X 100 ) ( 100 - Col.4 ) REMARK
1 2 3 4 5
37.5 0 0 0 100
26.5 0 0 0 100
19 0 0 0 100
13.2 0 0 0 100
4.75 102 102 5.21 94.79
2.36 402 504 25.74 74.26
0.3 769 1273 65.02 34.98
0.075 582 1855 94.75 5.25


Jointly
Jointly

1 2 3 4 5
37.5 0 0 0 100
26.5 0 0 0 100
19 0 0 0 100
13.2 0 0 0 100
4.75 170 170 7.04 92.96
2.36 525 695 28.78 71.22
0.3 903 1598 66.17 33.83
0.075 663 2261 93.62 6.38


1 2 3 4 5
37.5 0 0 0 100
26.5 0 0 0 100
19 0 0 0 100
13.2 0 0 0 100
4.75 225 225 10.45 89.55
2.36 386 611 28.38 71.62
0.3 804 1415 65.72 34.28
0.075 588 2003 93.05 6.95



Jointly
Jointly

1 2 3 4 5
37.5 0 0 0 100
26.5 0 0 0 100
19 0 0 0 100
13.2 0 0 0 100
4.75 182 182 4.99 95.01
2.36 701 883 24.22 75.78
0.3 1658 2541 69.71 30.29
0.075 874 3415 93.70 6.30

CT
( MDR )
12/04/2016
16/4/2016
Jointly
Jointly
REMARK
8153

CT
( MDR )
12/04/2016
16/4/2016
Jointly
Jointly
REMARK
8067

CT
( MDR )
12/04/2016
16/4/2016
Jointly
Jointly
REMARK
8631

CT
( MDR )
12/04/2016
16/4/2016
Jointly
Jointly
REMARK
9315
0
CT
( MDR )
12/04/2016
16/4/2016
Jointly
Jointly
REMARK
19550
0
Type of Material : Filler (Cement) Date of Testing : 17/4/2016

Jointly
Source : Birla A1 Cement Sampled by :
Jointly

PASSING
( gms ) - W2 ( gms ) - W3 ( W3 /W1 X 100 )
1 2 3 4 5
37.5 0 0 0 100
26.5 0 0 0 100
19 0 0 0 100
13.2 0 0 0 100
4.75 0 0 0 100
2.36 0 0 0 100
0.3 0 0 0 100
0.075 1 1 0.83 99.17


Jointly
Jointly

1 2 3 4 5
37.5 0 0 0 100
26.5 0 0 0 100
19 0 0 0 100
13.2 0 0 0 100
4.75 0 0 0 100
2.36 0 0 0 100
0.3 0 0 0 100
0.075 0.8 0.8 0.67 99.33


Jointly
Jointly

1 2 3 4 5
37.5 0 0 0 100
26.5 0 0 0 100
19 0 0 0 100
13.2 0 0 0 100
4.75 0 0 0 100
2.36 0 0 0 100
0.3 0 0 0 100
0.075 0.7 0.7 0.58 99.42


1 2 3 4 5
37.5 0 0 0 100
26.5 0 0 0 100
19 0 0 0 100
13.2 0 0 0 100
4.75 0 0 0 100
2.36 0 0 0 100
0.3 0 0 0 100
0.075 1 1 0.83 99.17



Jointly
Jointly

1 2 3 4 5
37.5 0 0 0 100
26.5 0 0 0 100
19 0 0 0 100
13.2 0 0 0 100
4.75 0 0 0 100
2.36 0 0 0 100
0.3 0 0 0 100
0.075 0.6 0.6 0.50 99.50

CT
( MDR )
12/04/2016
17/4/2016
Jointly
Jointly
REMARKS
8153

CT
( MDR )
12/04/2016
17/4/2016
Jointly
Jointly
REMARKS
8067

CT
( MDR )
12/04/2016
17/4/2016
Jointly
Jointly
REMARKS
8631

CT
( MDR )
12/04/2016
17/4/2016
Jointly
Jointly
REMARKS
9315
0
CT
( MDR )
12/04/2016
17/4/2016
Jointly
Jointly
REMARKS
19550
0
SUMMARY OF INDIVIDUAL GRADATION FOR DENSE BITUMINOUS MACADAMGRADE-II

Sige of
Aggregate 43-26 26-10 10-6 6 Down Filler (Cement)
.
Average Average Average Average Average
Sample. Sample. Sample. Sample. Sample. Sample. Sample. Sample. Sample. Sample. Sample. Sample. Sample. Sample. Sample. Sample. Sample. Sample. Sample. Sample. Sample. Sample. Sample. Sample. Sample.
Sieve Size
no 1 no 2 no 3 no 4 no 5 no 1 no 2 no 3 no 4 no 5 no 1 no 2 no 3 no 4 no 5 no 1 no 2 no 3 no 4 no 5 no 1 no 2 no 3 no 4 no 5
37.5 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.00 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.00 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.00 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.00 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.00
26.5 56.79 59.42 63.58 53.19 56.78 57.95 99.74 99.69 99.72 99.67 99.71 99.71 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
19 9.62 11.56 9.71 9.86 11.37 10.42 82.46 83.36 81.84 84.20 82.84 82.94 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
13.2 3.83 5.17 5.26 5.49 4.24 4.80 46.58 40.15 43.10 44.97 40.82 43.12 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
4.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.96 2.99 4.29 3.64 3.15 3.41 23.14 19.98 17.66 21.22 20.09 20.42 93.75 94.79 92.96 89.55 95.01 93.21 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
2.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.87 12.42 9.70 14.48 13.56 12.41 74.23 74.26 71.22 71.62 75.78 73.42 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
0.3 35.87 34.98 33.83 34.28 30.29 33.85 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
0.075 6.35 5.25 6.38 6.95 6.30 6.25 99.17 99.33 99.42 99.17 99.50 99.32
Remarks:-
For Contractor Rep. For Consultant Rep.

Chapter-3
JOB MIX FORMULA

3.0 General
Based on Marshall Method of mix design job mix formula is formulated and is as given under.
3.1 Proposed Gradation of Aggregates

Based on final blending of Hot bin aggregate combined gradation of JMF is as follows.
3.1.1 Proportion of Hot Bin Aggregate

1 BIN AGG1 ( 43mm to 26 mm) = 15.0 %
2 BIN AGG2 (26 mm to 10 mm ) = 23.0 %
3 BIN AGG3 (10 mm to 6mm ) = 15.0 %
4 BIN AGG4 ( 6 mm Down ) = 45.0 %
5 FILLER F1 ( cement ) = 2.0 %
IS Sieve % Passing Permissible JMF LIMITS Specification Limits

in mm JMF Variation Lower Upper Lower Upper
37.5 100.0 100 100 100 100
26.5 93.63 +/- 8 %. 90.00 100 90 100
19 82.64 +/- 8 %. 74.64 90.64 71 95
13.2 72.64 +/- 7 % 65.64 79.64 56 80
4.75 47.79 +/- 6% 41.79 53.79 38 54
2.36 36.90 +/- 5 %. 31.90 41.90 28 42
0.3 15.61 +/-4% 11.61 19.61 7 21
0.075 4.80 +/- 2 % 2.80 6.80 2 8
Job Mix Gradation Curve with Limits

110
JMF Lpwer JMF Upper SPe. LOwer Spe. Upper JMF
100
90
% Passing
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.01
0.1
100
10
Sieve size in mm
Remarks : -
3.2 The Marshall Properties at OBC 4.61% is Tablated below

Sl.No Properties Laboratory Results Specification Limits
1 Specific Gravity of the total Mix (Gmm) 2.524 --

2 Optimum binder content By wt of Mix 4.61 4.5% min
3 Optimum binder content By wt.of Agg 4.83 _
4 Bulk density (Gmb) of compacte mix 2.434 --
Marshall Stability (75 blows Each side)
@ 600C (Kgs) 1352 9 KN min
5
6 Marshall Flow @ 60 C 0
(mm) 3.2 2 - 4 mm
7 % of Air Voids 3.57 3 - 6%
8 Voids in mineral aggregate(VMA) 12.64 > 11%
9 Voids filled with bitumen(VFB) 71.76 65 - 75%
Retained Stability, Immersion in water for Min 80% Retained
89.8
10 24hours @ 600C (water Sensivity) Strength
Contractor Representative Consultant Representative

COMBINED GRADATION DBM GRADE- II AGGREGATES
Blending Proportion Trail Sheet no. 1
AGG. SIEVE SIZE (in mm) % SIEVE SIZE (in mm)
SIZE 37.5 26.5 19.0 13.2 4.75 2.36 0.3 0.075 BLEND 37.5 26.5 19.0 13.2 4.75 2.36 0.3 0.075
Bin-I 100.00 57.95 10.42 4.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 15.0 15.00 8.69 1.56 0.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Bin-II 100.00 99.71 82.94 43.12 3.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 23.0 23.00 22.93 19.08 9.92 0.78 0.00 0.00 0.00
Bin-III 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 20.42 12.41 0.00 0.00 15.0 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 3.06 1.86 0.00 0.00
Bin-IV 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 93.21 73.42 30.25 6.25 45.0 45.00 45.00 45.00 45.00 41.94 33.04 13.61 2.81
Filler 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 99.32 2.0 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.99
Upper limit 100.00 100.00 95.00 80.00 54.00 42.00 21.00 8.00
Lower Limit 100.00 90.00 71.00 56.00 38.00 28.00 7.00 2.00
DBM AGGREGATE GRADATION
Design 100.00 93.63 82.64 72.64 47.79 36.90 15.61 4.80
Mid Limits 100 95.00 83.00 68.00 46.00 35.00 14.00 5.00
120.00
100.00
80.00
60.00
40.00
20.00
0.00
0.01 0.1 1 10 100
MIX DESIGN FOR DENSE BITUMINOUS MACADAM (DBM) GRADE-II
I. SOURCE AND LOCATION OF MATERIALS:
1. Hotmix plant at Selud
2. Filler from Birla A1 cement
3. Bitumen of VG-30 Grade from BPCL

MATERIAL PROPERTIES
1.0 Source of Material
Aggregates Hotmix plant at Selud
Filler : Birla A1 cement
Bitumen : VG-30 Grade M/s. BPCL
1.1 Properties Of Material
The Physical properties of aggregate and Bitumen are conducted in the project laboratory /and the third party testing results
are summarized below. Individual test reports are furnished.
Table-2.1
Properties of Aggregate
Our Laboratory Third Party test Specification
Sl.No Properties Results Results Limits
1 AIV 19.50 -- Max 27%

2 EI & FI 28.39 -- Max 30%
3 Soundness Sodium Sulphate (Na2 SO4) -- 1.56 Max 12%
4 Magnesium sulphate _ 2.52 Max 18%
5 Sand Equivalent Test _ 75 Min 50
6 Stripping Value 98.17 _ Min 95%
Individual Specific Gravity of Aggregates, Cement
Bulk Sp.Gravity
SL.NO Size of Aggregate (Oven dry)
App.Sp.Gravity Water Absor
7 AGG 1 (43 - 26mm) 2.704 2.752 0.649

8 AGG 2 (26 - 10mm) 2.691 2.749 0.785
9 AGG 3 (10 - 6mm) 2.672 2.737 0.886
10 AGG 4 (6 Down) 2.605 2.704 1.403
11 Filler Cement 3.140
Table-2.2
Physical properties of Bitumen
Our Laboratory Third Party test Specification
Sl.No Properties Results Results Limits
1 Specific gravity at 27+ 1 ºC 1.020 _ Minimum 0.99
2 Penetration at 25ºC,100g, 5 Sec , 1/10mm 47 56 Min 45
3 Softening Point, ºC 49.6 50.6 Minnimum 47
4 Flash Point ºC, (Cleveland open Cup) - 248 Minnimum 220
5 Solubility in trichloroethylene % - 99.6 Minimum 99
6 Absolute viscosity at 600 C, poises - 2860 2400-3600
7 Kinematic viscosity at 1350 C, cSt - 418 Minnimum 350
8 Viscosity ratio at 600 - 2.5 Maximum 4.0
9 Ductility @25 ºC 87.5 62 Minimum 40

1 Mixing Plant Details:
Make : Linnhoff hot mix plant

Model : Mobile Type
Mixing : Batch Type
Capacity : 160 TPH
QTY in KGs/
Sl.No Bin No.
1 MT of Mix
1 AGG 1 258
2 AGG 2 395
3 AGG 3 258
4 AGG 4 773
5 Filler 34
6 Bitumen 83
2.0 Specified temperature at Various Stage
a Bitumen Temperature : 150 - 165 0C

b Aggregaste Temperature : 150 - 170 0C
c Mix Material Temperature : Max 165 0C
d Laying Temperature : Min 125 0C
e Rolling Temperature : Min 90 0C
Note:-
a) Hot Mix Plant is basically a batch type of Linnhoff make and production of 160 TPH Capacity.
b) The working System of this plant is completely Electronic Control and fully computerized.
c) The Plant contains in built internal sieves and Hot Bins to Separate the Pre-Heated
d) The separation is based on the requirements of gradation for DBM, etc… .
e) The Maximum Batch Capacity of This Plant is 2.0MT
Sign.of Contractor's Rep. Sign.of Consultant's Rep.

Mix Design For Dense Bituminous Macadam By Marshall Method OBC& Water Sensitivity
TRIAL MIX DATA OF DBM MIX AT OPTIMUM BINDER CONTENT
AGG 1 15% AGG 3 15% Grade of Bitumen VG-30

Proportion Of Agg :- F1 Cement 2%
AGG 2 23% AGG 4 45% Spe. Gr Of Bitumen 1.020
Specific Gravity and water absorption of individual fraction of agg Combined specific gravity
Fraction of Agg Bulk sp.Gr app.sp Gr water absorption
Com.bulk Gsb= 2.658 Source of Bitumen BPCL
Agg 1 2.704 2.752 0.649
Agg 2 2.691 2.749 0.785
Com .App Gsa= 2.734
Agg 3 2.672 2.737 0.886
Agg 4 2.605 2.704 1.403 Source of Agg : Hotmix plant at Selud
Gse (Theor) = 2.718
Filler (cement) 3.140 -
Date of Casting: 30/4/2016
Group-A Water Bath at 60 ±1 ºc for 30 to 40 min
Date of Testing: 01/5/2016
% % Mass in Grams Volume of (Gmb) (Gmm) Air Voids VMA VFB Stability In KG Corraction
Bitumen Bitumen Bulk S.G Dial
Specimen No Max S.G Flow in mm
by wt of of Total Of Comp.
agg mix In Air In water In SSD Specimen Spec of mix % % % Reading Load in Kg Corraction L load in Kg
1 4.83 4.61 1194.5 705 1196.0 491 2.433 195 1240 1.09 1352 3.5
2 1192.5 704 1193.5 489.5 2.436 200 1272 1.09 1386 2.9
3 1200.5 708.5 1202.0 493.5 2.433 190 1208 1.09 1317 3.3
Average water Temp. 27 Co 2.434 2.524 3.57 12.64 71.76 1352 3.2
Date of Casting: 30/4/2016

Group-B Water Bath at 60 ±1 ºc for 24 hours
Date of Testing: 02/5/2016
1 4.83 4.61 1195 705 1196.5 491.5 2.431 170 1081 1.09 1179 3.9
2 1198 706.5 1199.5 493.0 2.430 180 1145 1.09 1248 3.4
3 1190.5 702.5 1192.0 489.5 2.432 175 1113 1.09 1213 3.5
Average water Temp. 27 Co 2.431 2.524 3.68 12.75 71.14 1213 3.6
Water sensitivity = 89.8 %

Sign.of Contractor's Rep. Sign.of Consultant's Rep.
DETERMINATION OF OPTIMUM BINDER CONTENT FROM GRAPH
Binder content at Maximum Unit Weight : 4.60%
Binder content at flow : 4.75%
Binder Content at Maximum Stabillity : 4.70%
Binder content at VFB : 4.75%
Air voids : 4.30%
Optimum Binder Content by weight of Total Mix : 4.61%
Optimum Binder Content by weight of Aggregate : 4.83%
Remarks : -
It is observed that the Bitumen Content @ 4.61 % by weight of total mix satisfies
all the design criteria
Sign of Contractor's Rep. Sign. Of Consultant's Rep.

Summary of DBM mix Design JMF - 01
9 BC VMA Air voids VFB STABILITY FLOW DENSITY

3.50 13.19 6.89 47.76 1038 1.7 2.391
4.00 12.81 5.26 58.94 1190 2.1 2.414
4.50 12.88 4.09 68.25 1340 2.8 2.425
5.00 13.61 3.67 73.03 1308 3.2 2.417
5.50 14.88 3.86 74.06 1108 3.9 2.394
Passes all criteria
VFB
VMA
Air Voids
Flow
Stability
%Bitumen 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50
Index: Low Passing High
Sign.Of Contractor'S Rep. Sign .Of Consultant Rep.

77

Mix Design For Dense Bituminous Macadam By Marshall Method
Date of casting: 26/04/2016 Date of Testing: 27/04/2016
Source of Agg :Selud Crusher at Hotmix plant AGG 1 15% AGG 3 15% Grade of Bitumen VG-30
F1(Filler Cement)2%
Proportion Of Agg :- AGG 2 23% AGG 4 45% Spe. Gr Of Bitumen 1.020
Fraction of Agg Bulk sp.Gr App.sp Gr Water absorption
Agg 1 2.704 2.752 0.649
Agg 2 2.691 2.749 0.785
Com App Gsa= 2.734
Agg 3 2.672 2.737 0.886
Agg 4 2.605 2.704 1.403 Source of Aggregate Hotmix Plant at Selud
Gse = 2.718
Filler (Cement) 3.140
Volume of (Gmb ) Bulk S.G
Air
VMA VFB
Voids
% Bitumenby %Bitumen Mass in Grams Gmm Max Stability In KG
Specimen No
wt of agg ofTotal mix S.G of mix Dial Reading Load in (Kg) Corraction Corraction
In Air In water In SSD % % %
Specimen Of Comp. Spec Factor Load in (Kg)
1 3.63 3.50 1194.5 697 1197.5 500.5 2.387 161 1024 1.04 1065
2 1194 698 1195 497 2.402 160 1018 1.04 1058
3 1195.5 695 1196.5 501.5 2.384 150 954 1.04 992
Average water Temp. 27 Co 2.391 2.568 6.89 13.19 47.76 1038
1 4.17 4.00 1193 701 1194.5 493.5 2.417 180 1145 1.09 1248
2 1197.5 703 1198 495 2.419 170 1081 1.09 1179
3 1194.5 698 1194.5 496.5 2.406 165 1049 1.09 1144
1 4.71 4.50 1187.5 698 1189.5 491.5 2.416 195 1240 1.09 1352
2 1192 702 1193 491 2.428 190 1208 1.09 1317
3 1190.5 701 1191 490 2.430 195 1240 1.09 1352
1 5.26 5.00 1202 705 1203.5 498.5 2.411 195 1240 1.04 1290
2 1194.5 703 1195.5 492.5 2.425 190 1208 1.09 1317
3 1192 701 1194.5 493.5 2.415 190 1208 1.09 1317
1 5.82 5.50 1199 700 1201 501 2.393 170 1081 1.04 1124
2 1187.5 695 1189 494.0 2.404 160 1018 1.09 1109
3 1193.5 696 1196.5 500.5 2.385 165 1049 1.04 1091
1 Average 6.38 6.00 1268.1water Temp.
723 27 Co 1270 547.0 2.318
2.394 2.490 3.86 14.88 74.06 160 1085 0.89 965
1108
Remarks : -
78
Contractor Rep. Consultant Rep.

79
ATE ROAD SECTOR DEVELOPMENT PROJECT

itation and Upgradation of Anda - Funda ( MDR )
se Bituminous Macadam By Marshall Method
VG-30
1.020
BPCL
Hotmix Plant at Selud
Flow in (mm)
1.8
1.7
1.6
1.7
2.0
2.5
1.9
2.1
2.5
3.0
2.8
2.8
3.2
3.5
3.0
3.2
4.3
3.5
4.0
4.0
3.9
80
Consultant Rep.
81

Three Points Checked
Date of casting: 29/04/2016 Date of Testing: 30/04/2016
Source of Agg :Rana Crusher at Selud AGG 1 15% AGG 3 15% Grade of Bitumen VG-30 (60/70)
F1(Filler Cement)2%
Proportion Of Agg :- AGG 2 23% AGG 4 45% Spe. Gr Of Bitumen 1.020
Fraction of Agg Bulk sp.Gr App.sp Gr SSD Sp.Gr Water absorption
Agg 1 2.704 2.752 0.649
Agg 2 2.691 2.749 0.785
Com App Gsa= 2.734
Agg 3 2.672 2.737 0.886
Agg 4 2.605 2.704 1.403 Source of Aggregate Hotmix plant at Selud
Gse = 2.718
Filler (Cement) 3.140
%Bitumen Volume of (Gmb )

% Mass in Grams Bulk S.G Gmm AV VMA VFB Stability In KG
Specimen No Bitumenby of Total Max S.G Dial Load in Kg Corraction Corraction
wt of agg Of Comp. of mix
In Air In water In SSD % % %
mix Specimen Spec Reading Factor Load in Kg
1 4.50 4.31 1187.5 700 1189.5 489.5 2.426 190 1208 1.09 1317
2 1192 702 1193 491 2.428 185 1177 1.09 1282
3 1190.5 697 1191 494 2.410 195 1240 1.09 1352
1 4.83 4.61 1193.5 702.5 1193 490.5 2.433 200 1272 1.09 1386
2 1191.5 701.5 1192 490.5 2.429 200 1272 1.09 1386
3 1191 702.5 1192 489.5 2.433 190 1208 1.09 1317
1 5.16 4.91 1197.5 706 1197.5 491.5 2.431 185 1177 1.09 1282
2 1196.5 704 1197.5 493.5 2.425 180 1145 1.09 1248
3 1194.5 699.5 1196 496.5 2.406 185 1177 1.04 1224
82
Contractor Rep Consultant Rep.

83
E ROAD SECTOR DEVELOPMENT PROJECT

tion and Upgradation of Anda - Funda ( MDR )
ree Points Checked
VG-30 (60/70)
1.020
BPCL
Hotmix plant at Selud
Flow in
mm
2.7
2.9
3.2
2.9
2.9
3.4
3.1
3.1
3.8
3.0
3.4
3.4
84
Consultant Rep.
Mix Design For Dense Bituminous Macadam By Marshall Method
BC VMA Air Voids VFB STABILITY FLOW DENSITY

3.50 13.19 6.89 47.76 1038 1.7 2.391
4.00 12.81 5.26 58.94 1190 2.1 2.414
4.50 12.88 4.09 68.25 1340 2.8 2.425
5.00 13.61 3.67 73.03 1308 3.2 2.417
5.50 14.88 3.86 74.06 1108 3.9 2.394
15.50 7.00
15.00 6.00
14.50
5.00
14.00
4.00
13.50
13.00 3.00
12.50 2.00
12.00 1.00
11.50
0.00
11.00
3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 6.00
3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5
Bitumen Content Vs VMA Bitumen Content Vs Air Voids 4.30%
90.00 1500
85.00
1400
80.00
75.00 1300
70.00 1200
65.00
1100
60.00
55.00 1000
50.00 900
3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 6.00
Bitumen Content Vs VFB 4.70% Bitumen Content Vs Stability 4.70%

4.5
2.490
4.0
2.470
3.5
2.450
3.0
2.430
2.5
2.410
2.0 2.390
1.5 2.370
1.0 2.350
3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 6.00 6.50
Bitumen Content Vs Flow 4.75% Bitumen Content Vs Density 4.60%
4.3+4.6+4.75+4.7+4.7
Remarks :- 23.05
4.61
5
4.61

Maximum specific gravity of Bitumen Mixture(Gmm)

Laboratory Job No. Lab /DBM /GMM/01 Date Sampled
Location/Source of Materials Hotmix plant at Selud Sampled by
Type of Materials DBM Mix Date of Test
Size of aggregate DBM Mix Tested by
Bitumen Content (Pb) 4.61 Specific gravity
Wt. Of GMM Bottle 1199 1199

1
Wt. Of GMM Bottle and water (A) 3407 3407
2
Wt.of pycnometer, sample and water (B) 4406 4423
3
Wt of sample (C ) 1655 1682
4 Max Specific Gravityof mix (GMM=(C/(C- (B-A))) 2.523 2.526
5 Effective Specific Gravity (Gse = (Pmm-pb)/(Pmm/Gm 2.716 2.720
Remarks : -

)
28/04/2016
Jointly
28/04/2016
Jointly
1.02
2.524
2.718
nsultant Rep.
Source of Aggregate :- Hotmix plant at Selud

Grade and Source of bitumen :- VG-30 -BPCL
Proportion of Hot Bin Aggregate
1 AGG 1 (43 mm to 26 mm ) P1 = 15 %
1 AGG 2 (26 mm to 10 mm ) P2 = 23 %
2 AGG 3 (10 mm to 6 mm ) P3 = 15 %
3 AGG 4 ( 6 mm Down) P4 = 45 %
4 FILLER F1 ( Cement) P5 = 2%
Specific Gravity of Aggregate Specific gravity and water Absorption of individual

fracation of agg:-
Fraction of Bulk App. Water
Agg Sp.Grvity Sp.Gravity Absortion (%)
BIN A1 2.704 2.752 0.649
BIN A2 2.691 2.749 0.785
BIN A3 2.672 2.737 0.886
BIN A4 2.605 2.704 1.403

Filler (Cement ) F1 3.140
Specific Gravity of Bitumen (Gb) 1.020
Bulk Ap .Gr . Of Aggregate(Gsb) :
Gsb = P1+P2+P3+P4+P5 = 2.658

P1/A1+P2/A2+P3/A3+P4/A4+P5/F1
Apperenet Sp. Gr. Of Agg : (Gsa)
Gsa = P1+P2+P3+P4+P5 = 2.734

P1/ A1+P2/A2+P3/A3+P4/A4+P5/F1
Eff . Sp. Gr. Of aggregate (Gse) :
pmm-pb
Gse =
pmm/Gmm-pb/Gb = 2.718
Max Theoritical Sp.Gr.of Mix (Gmm) at each bitumen content
Bitumen Content in (%) Gmm

3.50 : 2.568
4.00 : 2.548
4.50 : 2.528
5.00 : 2.509
5.50 : 2.490
Remarks:-

SPECIFIC GRAVITY OF CEMENT
Type of Materials Cement Date of Sample 23/04/2016
Location/Source of Materials Hotmix plant at Selud Date of Testing 4/23/2016
Source of Material Birla A1 Cement Tested By. Jointly
Sampled By. Jointly
Trial No. 1 2 Mean

Wt.of Empty bottle (g) W1 24.86 24.86
Wt of Empty bottle + Half filled with Cement (g) W2 55.1 55.24
Wt of Empty bottle + Half filled with Cement +Kerosene (g) W3 87.24 87.35
Wt of Empty bottle +Kerosene (g) W4 64.61 64.61
Specific Gravity of Cement (g) W5 ((W2-W1/((W4-W1)-(W3-W2)))*0.79 3.139 3.141 3.140

Remarks : -

SPECIFIC GRAVITY OF BITUMEN

Location/Source of Materials BPCL Date of Sample 21/04/2016
Type of Materials VG-30 Bitumen Date of Test 24/04/2016
Tested By. Jointly
Sampled By. Jointly
Sl. NO Sample No. 1 2 Average
1 Wt. Of Sp.Gr. Bottle (A) 26.99 26.99
2 Wt of water (B) 48.62 48.62
3 Wt of sp.Gr. Bottle+half filled bitumen (C ) 53.28 52.86
4 Wt. Of Sp.Gr. Bottle + Distilled Water gm (D) (A+ 75.61 75.61

5 Wt .of Sp. Bottle + Sample + Water (E ) 76.13 76.10
6 Wt .of Sample (F ) (C+A ) 26.29 25.87
7 Bulk SpecificGravity GB (G )=(C/(C-(B-A))) 1.020 1.019 1.020
Remarks : -

CHHATTISGARH STATE ROAD SECTOT DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
NAME OF THE PROJECT Package No. 14, Rehabilitation and Upgradation of Anda - Funda ( MDR )
CLIENT PWD Raipur (Chhattisgarh), ADB Funded
CSE EGIS International Pvt. Ltd. JV with EGIS India CS Pvt. Ltd.
NAME OF CONTRACTOR AMAR - DRA ( J/V )
DUCTILITY OF TAR & BITUMINOUS MATRIALS

Purpose of Use DBM Date of sampling 21/04/2016
Source BPCL Sampled by Jointly
Grade of Bitumen VG-30 Date of testing 23/04/2016
Location HM Plant @ Selud Tested by Jointly
observations:
Room Temperature : 27 0
C
Pouring Temperature : 100 0

C
Period of cooling in atmosphere : 35 (minutes)
Actual test Temperature : 25 0

C
Briquitte Number
Description
1 2 Avg.
(a) Initial Reading (cm) 0 0
(b) Final Reading (cm) 85 90
Ductility = b-a (cm) 85 90 87.5
REMARKS:
Contractor's Consultant`s
Representative Representative
ECT
21/04/2016
Jointly
23/04/2016
Jointly
ultant`s
sentative
SPECIFIC GRAVITY OF AGGREGATE
Laboratory Job No. Lab /DBM / 01 Date Sampled 12/04/2016

Location/Source of Materials Hotmix plant at Selud Sampled by Jointly
Type of Materials C.Agg Date of Test 19/4/2016
Size of aggregate AGG BIN 1 (43mm to26mm) Tested by Jointly

1 Wt.Of sample in water (B) 2230 2184
2 Wt of ssd sample (C ) 3527 3452
3 Wt. Of Oven Dried sample ( D) 3504 3430
4 Bulk specific Gravity Oven D/(C-B) 2.702 2.705 2.704
5 Apparent Specific Gravity (D/D-B) 2.750 2.753 2.752
6 Water Absorption % 0.656 0.641 0.649
Remarks : -


Size of aggregate AGG BIN 2 (26mm to 10mm) Tested by Jointly

Volumateric correction (Vcf) 1 1
1
1 Wt.Of samale in water (B) 1449 1551
2 Wt of ssd sample (C ) 2294 2458.5
3 Wt. Of Oven Dried sample ( D) 2276 2439.5
4 Bulk specific Gravity (D/(C-B) 2.693 2.688 2.691
5 Apparent Specific Gravity (D/(D-B) 2.752 2.746 2.749
Remarks : -


Size of aggregate AGG BIN 3 (10mm to 6mm) Tested by Jointly

Volumateric correction (Vcf) 1 1
1
1 Wt.Of samale in water (B) 909 917
2 Wt of ssd sample (C ) 1444 1459
3 Wt. Of Oven Dried sample ( D) 1431.5 1446
4 Bulk specific Gravity (D/(C-B) 2.676 2.668 2.672
5 Apparent Specific Gravity (D/(D-B) 2.740 2.733 2.737
Remarks : -


Type of Materials F.Agg Date of Test 19/4/2016
Size of aggregate AGG 4 (6 Down) Tested by Jointly
1 wt.of pycnometer 600.5 600.5

2 wt.of pycnometer and water (A) 1504 1504
3 wt.of pycnometer, Sample and water (A) 1871.5 1855
4 Wt of ssd sample (C ) 591 565.3
5 Wt. Of Oven Dried sample ( D) 582.8 557.5
6 Bulk specific Gravity (D/(C-(B-A) 2.608 2.601 2.605
7 Apparent Specific Gravity (D/(D-(B-A) 2.707 2.700 2.704
Remarks : -

STRIPPING VALUE OF ROAD AGGREGATES
Laboratory job No Lab/01 Date sampled 21/04/2016
Type Of Material C.Agg Sampled By Jointly

Source / Location Hotmix plant at Selud Date Tested 24/04/2016
Proposed Use DBM Tested By Jointly
Type o Aggregate : 20 mm passing 12.5 mm Retained

Type of Binder : VG-30
Percentage of binder used : 5.00%
Total Wt. of Aggregate : 200gm
Total Wt. of Binder : 10gm
Temparature of water bath : 40oC + or - 1oC (for 24 hrs)
Stripping (Percentagre)
Sl.No. Average % Required Minimum(Coated with Bitumen)
Coated with Bitumen
1
98.5
2 98.17 95%
98
3
98
Remarks :___________________________________________________________________________________

SOFTENING POINT TEST
(As per IS : 1205 1978)
Lab. Job No. Lab /Bitumen /01 Date Sampled 21/04/2016

Location / Source BPCL Date Tested 23/04/2016
Sampled From BPCL Sampled by Jointly
Proposed Use DBM Tested by Jointly
Grade of bitumen : VG-30
Time (min) Temp. of water and Borosil jar ºC

0 5
1 10.5
2 14.5
3 20
4 24.5
5 30
6 35.5
7 40
8 45
Observations :-
Sample - 1
Test property Ball No. Softening Point Mean Value
1 2
Temp at which
Sample touches" 49.2 50 49.6
bottom plate (ºC)
Note: Rate of Heating 5 ºC ± 0.5 ºC Min.
Remarks :

BITUMEN PENETRATION TEST
Lab. Job No. Lab /Bitumen /01 Date Sampled 21/04/2016
Location / Source BPCL Date Tested 23/04/2016
Sampled From BPCL Sampled by Jointly
Grade of bitumen : VG-30
Penetration in 5 Average Penetration

Initial Reading Final Reading
Sl No. seconds ( 0.1mm) (0.1 MM) Requirement
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)
1 141(0) 186 45
2 144(0) 191 47 47 Min 45
3 143(0) 192 49
Remarks:-

DETERMINATION OF FLAKINESS & ELONGATION INDEX OF COARSE AGGREGATE
(IS-2386, PART-1 (BS 812 : SECTION 105 - 1)
Lab Job No Lab /DBM /01 Date Sampled 12/04/2016

Location/Source Hotmix plant at Selud Date Tested 17/04/2016
Type of Material C.Agg Sampled by Jointly
Wt. of Total Wt. of Non flaki Wt. of Flaki Wt.of Elongated

Sieve Size MM
Material Material Material Material
Passing Retained (gm) (gm) (gm) (gm)
A B C D = C/A X 100
63 50
50 40 0 0 0 0
40 31.5 0 0 0 0
31.5 25 7500 6750 750 -
25 20 5214 4328 886 1125
20 16 3879 3530 349 785
16 12.5 2257 1896 361 427

12.5 10 1452 1191 261 349
10 6.3 602 470 132 89
Total A= 20904 B= 18164 C= 2740 D= 2775
Flakiness Index (FI) = C/A X 100 = 13.11 %
Elongation Index (EI) = D/B X 100 = 15.28 %
Combined flakiness and Elongation = (C/A +D/B) = 22 28.39 %
Specification Limit DBM 30 % Max
Remarks …………………………………………………………………………………………………………

AGGREGATE IMPACT VALUE TEST
As per IS 2386 Part - 4
Lab Job No. Lab /DBM /01 Date Sampled 12/04/2016

Location/Source Hotmix plant at Selud Date Tested 17/04/2016
Type of Material C.Agg Sampled by Jointly
Description Trial No. 1 Trial No. 2 Trial No. 3
Weight of surface dry sample passing 12.5 mm and

(gm) 356 353 350
retained on 10 mm IS sieves, W1
Weight of fraction passing 2.36 mm IS sieve, after
(gm) 70.1 70.6 65.8
the test, W2
Weight of fraction retained on 2.36 mm IS sieve
(gm) 285.9 282.4 284.2
after the test, W3
A.I.V. = (W2 / W1)X100 (%) 19.69 20.00 18.80
Average value of A.I.V. (%) 19.50
Note : If > 1g, discard and retest.
Remarks :-

JOB MIX FORMULA TECHNICAL CALCULATIONS
1) Maximum Sp.Gravity of Prevailing mix for different Bitumen Contents :
Pmm
Max.Sp.Gravity (Gmm) =
Ps/Gse + Pb/Gb
Where :
Gmm - Max.Sp.Gravity of paving mixture(no air voids) 2.524
Pmm - Percent by weight of total loose mixture = 100 100
Pb - Asphalt content, percent by total weight of mixture 4.61
Ps - Aggregate content ,percent by total weight of mixture 95.39
Gb - Specific gravity of asphalt 1.020
Gse - Effective Specific gravity aggregate 2.718
Gmb - Bulk Specific gravity of compacted mixture 2.434
Gsb - Bulk Sp.Gravity of total aggregate 2.658
1) Maximum Sp.Gravity of Prevailing mix for different Bitumen Contents :(Gmm)

Bitumen content
Pmm Ps Gse Gb Gmm
Pb
3.5 100 96.5 2.718 1.020 2.568
4.0 100 96.0 2.718 1.020 2.548
4.5 100 95.5 2.718 1.020 2.528
5.0 100 95.0 2.718 1.020 2.509
5.5 100 94.5 2.718 1.020 2.490
2) Percent air Voids : (Va) = (Gmm - Gmb/Gmm)x100

Bitumen content
Gmm Gmb % Air voids
Pb
3.5 2.568 2.391 6.89
4.0 2.548 2.414 5.26
4.5 2.528 2.425 4.09
5.0 2.509 2.417 3.67
5.5 2.490 2.394 3.86
3) Voids in mineral Aggregate (VMA) : = 100 - Gmb x Ps/Gsb

Bitumen content
Gmb Ps Gsb VMA
Pb
3.5 2.391 96.5 2.658 13.19
4.0 2.414 96.0 2.658 12.81
4.5 2.425 95.5 2.658 12.88
5.0 2.417 95.0 2.658 13.61
5.5 2.394 94.5 2.658 14.88
4) Voids Filled with Bitumen (VFB) : = 100(VMA - Va)/VMA

Bitumen content
VMA Va VFB
Pb
3.5 13.19 6.89 47.76
4.0 12.81 5.26 58.94
4.5 12.88 4.09 68.25
5.0 13.61 3.67 73.03
5.5 14.88 3.86 74.06

DBM Mould Casting Indivisual Weights: Sample Weights Sample Weights

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

DBM Mould Casting Indivisual Weights: Sample Weights Sample Weights

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

DBM Mould Casting Indivisual Weights: Sample Weights Sample Weights

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

DBM MOULD CASTING INDIVISUAL WEIGHTS

DBM MIX DESIGN (GRADE-II)

Client : PWD Raipur (Chhattisgarh), ADB Project

Contractor : AMAR - DRA ( J/V )

Lab Ref No : Sample No .01 Date of Sampling : 12/04/2016

Type of Material : 43-26 Date of Testing : 13/4/2016

WEIGHT OF THE SAMPLE = ( W1 ) = 201 30145

37.5 0 0 0.00 100.00

26.5 13025 13025 43.21 56.79

19 14220 27245 90.38 9.62

13.2 1745 28990 96.17 3.83

For Contractor's Rep. For Consultant's Rep.

Lab Ref No : Sample No .02 Date of Sampling : 12/04/2016

Type of Material : 43-26 Date of Testing : 13/4/2016

WEIGHT OF THE SAMPLE = ( W1 ) = 18 29783

37.5 0 0 0.00 100.00

26.5 12085 12085 40.58 59.42

19 14256 26341 88.44 11.56

13.2 1902 28243 94.83 5.17

For Contractor's Rep. For Consultant's Rep.

Lab Ref No : Sample No .03 Date of Sampling : 12/04/2016

Type of Material : 43-26 Date of Testing : 13/4/2016

WEIGHT OF THE SAMPLE = ( W1 ) = 2 34256 grm

37.5 0 0 0.00 100.00

26.5 12475 12475 36.42 63.58

19 18456 30931 90.29 9.71

13.2 1523 32454 94.74 5.26

For Contractor's Rep. For Consultant's Rep.

Lab Ref No : Sample No .04 Date of Sampling : 12/04/2016

Type of Material : 43-26 Date of Testing : 13/4/2016

Source : Selud Crusher Sampled by : Jointly

Location : Hot mix plant at Selud Tested by : Jointly

WEIGHT OF THE SAMPLE = ( W1 ) = 221428746

37.5 0 0 0.00 100.00

26.5 13456 13456 46.81 53.19

19 12456 25912 90.14 9.86

13.2 1256 27168 94.51 5.49

CHHATTISGARH STATE ROAD SECTOR DEVELOPMENT PROJECT

Lab Ref No : Sample No .05 Date of Sampling : 12/04/2016

Type of Material : 43-26 Date of Testing : 13/4/2016

WEIGHT OF THE SAMPLE = ( W1 ) = 19 30125

37.5 0 0 0.00 100.00

26.5 13020 13020 43.22 56.78

19 13679 26699 88.63 11.37

13.2 2150 28849 95.76 4.24

Lab Ref No : Sample No .01 Date of Sampling : 12/04/2016

Type of Material : 26-10 Date of Testing : 14/4/2016

WEIGHT OF THE SAMPLE = ( W1 ) = 201 22142 grm

37.5 0 0 0.00 100.00

26.5 58 58 0.26 99.74

19 3826 3884 17.54 82.46

13.2 7944 11828 53.42 46.58

4.75 9658 21486 97.04 2.96

For Contractor's Rep. For Consultant's Rep.

Lab Ref No : Sample No .02 Date of Sampling : 12/04/2016

Type of Material : 26-10 Date of Testing : 14/4/2016

WEIGHT OF THE SAMPLE = ( W1 ) = 18 24560

37.5 0 0 0.00 100.00

26.5 75 75 0.31 99.69