Derivatives and Risk Management: Answers To Beginning-Of-Chapter Questions
Derivatives and Risk Management: Answers To Beginning-Of-Chapter Questions
Derivatives and Risk Management: Answers To Beginning-Of-Chapter Questions
23-1 “Managing Risks” means taking steps to mitigate the effects of adverse
events. Buying fire insurance is an attempt to mitigate the adverse
consequences of a fire. Risk managers attempt to identify all the risks
a firm faces, and then consider what steps might be taken to mitigate
them. Buying insurance is one form of mitigation for certain risks.
The most prevalent risk most firms face is that customers will not
want to buy enough of their products at a price that will permit the
firm to earn a profit. Only good general management, not by risk
management as we define it, can generally mitigate that particular risk.
However, risk managers can often use hedging techniques to guard against
adverse price, interest rate, and exchange rate changes.
In general, stockholders dislike risk, so if a firm can stabilize its
earnings by using hedging techniques and the like without unduly high
costs, this will benefit its stock price. Of course, stockholders can
themselves diversify. For example, an increase in the price of copper
might hurt a firm that uses copper, but copper producers will benefit,
so the effect on a diversified investor’s portfolio should be small.
Even so, investors prefer predictability in earnings, so even if they
can diversify themselves, they probably prefer to have firms diversify,
provided the cost is not too high.
Another reason for managing risk has to do with capital investment
programs. If a firm’s earnings are unstable, it might not be able to
obtain financing to meet its capital expenditure program requirements.
This can be disruptive and costly, for a start-stop long-term
construction program is less efficient than one that proceeds smoothly.
23-2 Swaps are transactions where two parties swap payment streams. For
example, one firm might have to make floating rate payments and another
firm have to make fixed rate payments. The firms can use a swap under
which each agrees to make the other’s payments. Similarly, firms with
debt denominated in different currencies can arrange swaps. For
example, a U.S. firm may have borrowed in the U.S. to finance its
Italian operations, which will provide Euros, which would then have to
be converted to dollars to make payments on the debt. If the dollar
rises against the Euro, the Euros the firm earns may not buy enough
dollars to make the required payments. So, the U.S. firm might want to
swap its dollar payment obligation for Euro payments. An Italian firm
(or any other Euro bloc firm) that has to make Euro payments derived
from U.S. operations would be a logical counter-party to the swap. More
likely, though, an international bank would serve as counter-party to
both firms, and if it had both ends of the ultimate transaction, it
would be hedged itself.
Companies whose earnings rise with interest rate (like many banks)
might prefer floating rate to fixed rate debt, while other companies
would want to lock in fixed payment obligations. If two such firms both
had the “wrong” kind of debt, they could arrange a swap. Again, a bank
23-3 See the Excel model for an answer to Question 3. Here we show that both
companies get the payment pattern they prefer, and at a lower cost than
if they borrowed directly with the desired pattern.
23-4 Futures contracts are deals where one party agrees to buy, and the other
agrees to sell, something a specified future date. For example, a T-
bond futures contract is a contract to buy (or to sell) $100,000 of a
hypothetical 20 year, 6%, Treasury bond at some specified future date.
As market interest rates in the economy change, so will the value of the
T-bond contract. Interest rate futures are used to hedge against
changes adverse changes in interest rates. For example, if a firm plans
to issue new bonds to refund a currently outstanding high-rate issue,
and if it is that afraid interest rates will rise before it can bring
out the new issue, then it can hedge by shorting Treasury bond futures.
Then, if market rates do rise, it will earn a profit on its short
positions and thus offset the higher interest rate it will have to pay
on its refunding bonds.
23-5 See the BOC Excel model for the answer to Question 5. Here we show the
number of T-bond futures contracts that would be used in the hedge (500
contract, with a nominal value of $50 million), the cost of setting up
the hedge, and the results under different assumptions interest rate
changes over the next 6 months.
23-3 Six reasons why risk management might increase the value of a firm is
that it allows corporations to (1) increase their use of debt; (2)
maintain their capital budget over time; (3) avoid costs associated with
financial distress; (4) utilize their comparative advantages in hedging
relative to the hedging ability of individual investors; (5) reduce both
the risks and costs of borrowing by using swaps; and (6) reduce the
higher taxes that result from fluctuating earnings.
23-4 There are several ways to reduce a firm's risk exposure. First, a firm
can transfer its risk to an insurance company, which requires periodic
premium payments established by the insurance company based on its
perception of the firm's risk exposure. Second, the firm can transfer
risk-producing functions to a third party. For example, contracting
with a trucking company can in effect, pass the firm's risks from
transportation to the trucking company. Third, the firm can purchase
derivatives contracts to reduce input and financial risks. Fourth, the
firm can take specific actions to reduce the probability of occurrence
of adverse events. This includes replacing old electrical wiring or
using fire resistant materials in areas with the greatest fire
potential. Fifth, the firm can take actions to reduce the magnitude of
the loss associated with adverse events, such as installing an automatic
sprinkler system to suppress potential fires. Finally, the firm can
totally avoid the activity that gives rise to the risk.
23-5 The futures market can be used to guard against interest rate and input
price risk through the use of hedging. If the firm were concerned that
interest rates will rise, it would use a short hedge, or sell financial
futures contracts. If interest rates do rise, losses on the issue due
to the higher interest rates would be offset by gains realized from
repurchase of the futures at maturity--because of the increase in
interest rates, the value of the futures would be less than at the time
of issue. If the firm were concerned that the price of an input will
rise, it would use a long hedge, or buy commodity futures. At the
future's maturity date, the firm will be able to purchase the input at
the original contract price, even if market prices have risen in the
interim.
23-2 a. In this situation, the firm would be hurt if interest rates were to
rise by June, so it would use a short hedge, or sell futures
contracts. Since futures contracts are for $100,000 in Treasury
bonds, the firm must sell 100 contracts to cover the planned
$10,000,000 June bond issue. Since futures maturing in June are
selling for 95 17/32 of par, the value of Zinn's futures is about
$9,553,125. Should interest rates rise by June, Zinn Company will be
able to repurchase the futures contracts at a lower cost, which will
help offset their loss from financing at the higher interest rate.
Thus, the firm has hedged against rising interest rates.
b. The firm would now pay 13 percent on the bonds. With an 11 percent
coupon rate, the bond issue would bring in only $8,898,149, so the
firm would lose $10,000,000 - $8,898,149 = $1,101,851:
Since Zinn Company sold the futures contracts for $9,553,125, and
will, in effect, buy them back at $7,693,948, the firm would make a
23-3 If Carter issues floating rate debt and then swaps, its net cash flows
will be: -(LIBOR + 2%) – 7.95% + LIBOR = -9.95%. This is less than the
10% rate at which it could directly issue fixed rate debt, so the swap
is good for Carter.
If Brence issues fixed rate debt and then swaps, its net cash flows will
be: -11% + 7.95% - LIBOR = -(LIBOR + 3.05%). This is less than the rate
at which it could directly issue floating rate debt (LIBOR + 3%), so the
swap is good for Brence.
23-4 The detailed solution for the problem is available both on the
instructor’s resource CD-ROM (in the file Solution to Ch 23-4 Build a
Model.xls) and on the instructor’s side of the web site,
http://brigham.swcollege.com.
ASSUME THAT YOU HAVE JUST BEEN HIRED AS A FINANCIAL ANALYST BY TENNESSEE
SUNSHINE INC., A MID-SIZED TENNESSEE COMPANY THAT SPECIALIZES IN CREATING
EXOTIC SAUCES FROM IMPORTED FRUITS AND VEGETABLES. THE FIRM'S CEO, BILL
STOOKSBURY, RECENTLY RETURNED FROM AN INDUSTRY CORPORATE EXECUTIVE CONFERENCE
IN SAN FRANCISCO, AND ONE OF THE SESSIONS HE ATTENDED WAS ON THE PRESSING NEED
FOR SMALLER COMPANIES TO INSTITUTE CORPORATE RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS. SINCE
NO ONE AT TENNESSEE SUNSHINE IS FAMILIAR WITH THE BASICS OF DERIVATIVES AND
CORPORATE RISK MANAGEMENT, STOOKSBURY HAS ASKED YOU TO PREPARE A BRIEF REPORT
THAT THE FIRM'S EXECUTIVES COULD USE TO GAIN AT LEAST A CURSORY UNDERSTANDING
OF THE TOPICS.
TO BEGIN, YOU GATHERED SOME OUTSIDE MATERIALS ON DERIVATIVES AND CORPORATE
RISK MANAGEMENT AND USED THESE MATERIALS TO DRAFT A LIST OF PERTINENT
QUESTIONS THAT NEED TO BE ANSWERED. IN FACT, ONE POSSIBLE APPROACH TO THE
PAPER IS TO USE A QUESTION-AND-ANSWER FORMAT. NOW THAT THE QUESTIONS HAVE
BEEN DRAFTED, YOU HAVE TO DEVELOP THE ANSWERS.
Mini Case: 23 - 9
B. WHAT ARE SIX REASONS RISK MANAGEMENT MIGHT INCREASE THE VALUE OF A
CORPORATION?
ANSWER: THERE ARE NO STUDIES PROVING THAT RISK MANAGEMENT EITHER DOES OR DOES
NOT ADD VALUE. HOWEVER, THERE ARE SIX REASONS WHY RISK MANAGEMENT
MIGHT INCREASE THE VALUE OF A FIRM. RISK MANAGEMENT ALLOWS
CORPORATIONS TO (1) INCREASE THEIR USE OF DEBT; (2) MAINTAIN THEIR
CAPITAL BUDGET OVER TIME; (3) AVOID COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH FINANCIAL
DISTRESS; (4) UTILIZE THEIR COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGES IN HEDGING
RELATIVE TO THE HEDGING ABILITY OF INDIVIDUAL INVESTORS; (5) REDUCE
BOTH THE RISKS AND COSTS OF BORROWING BY USING SWAPS; AND (6) REDUCE
THE HIGHER TAXES THAT RESULT FROM FLUCTUATING EARNINGS.
D. RISKS THAT FIRMS FACE CAN BE CATEGORIZED IN MANY WAYS. DEFINE THE
FOLLOWING TYPES OF RISK: (1) SPECULATIVE RISKS; (2) PURE RISKS; (3)
DEMAND RISKS; (4) INPUT RISKS; (5) FINANCIAL RISKS; (6) PROPERTY
RISKS; (7) PERSONNEL RISKS; (8) ENVIRONMENTAL RISKS; (9) LIABILITY
RISKS; AND (10) INSURABLE RISKS.
ANSWER: 1. SPECULATIVE RISKS ARE THOSE THAT OFFER THE CHANCE OF A GAIN AS
WELL AS A LOSS, SUCH AS BUYING AN OWNERSHIP SHARE IN A COMPANY.
2. PURE RISKS ARE THOSE THAT ONLY OFFER THE PROSPECT OF LOSSES,
SUCH AS A PRODUCT LIABILITY OR MALPRACTICE LAWSUIT (FROM THE
DEFENDANT'S STANDPOINT).
3. DEMAND RISKS ARE THOSE ASSOCIATED WITH THE DEMAND FOR A FIRM'S
PRODUCTS OR SERVICES, SUCH AS NEW PRODUCTS DEVELOPED BY
COMPETITORS.
Mini Case: 23 - 10
4. INPUT RISKS ARE THOSE ASSOCIATED WITH A FIRM'S INPUT COSTS,
INCLUDING MATERIALS AND LABOR.
5. FINANCIAL RISKS ARE THOSE THAT RESULT FROM FINANCIAL
TRANSACTIONS, SUCH AS INTEREST RATE AND CURRENCY EXCHANGE RATE
RISKS.
7. PERSONNEL RISKS ARE RISKS THAT RESULT FROM HUMAN ACTIONS, SUCH
AS THEFT AND FRAUD.
F. WHAT ARE SOME ACTIONS THAT COMPANIES CAN TAKE TO MINIMIZE OR REDUCE
RISK EXPOSURES?
Mini Case: 23 - 11
ANSWER: THERE ARE SEVERAL ACTIONS THAT COMPANIES CAN TAKE TO MINIMIZE OR
REDUCE THEIR RISK EXPOSURE. FIRST, COMPANIES CAN TRANSFER RISK TO AN
INSURANCE COMPANY BY PAYING PERIODIC PREMIUMS. SECOND, COMPANIES CAN
TRANSFER FUNCTIONS WHICH PRODUCE RISK TO THIRD PARTIES, SUCH AS
ELIMINATING RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH TRANSPORTATION BY CONTRACTING WITH
A TRUCKING COMPANY. THIRD, PURCHASE DERIVATIVES CONTRACTS TO REDUCE
INPUT AND FINANCIAL RISK. FOURTH, COMPANIES CAN TAKE ACTIONS TO
REDUCE THE PROBABILITY OF OCCURRENCE OF AN ADVERSE EVENT, SUCH AS
REPLACING OLD WIRING TO REDUCE THE POSSIBILITY OF FIRE. FIFTH,
ACTIONS CAN BE TAKEN TO REDUCE THE MAGNITUDE OF THE LOSS ASSOCIATED
WITH ADVERSE EVENTS, SUCH AS INSTALLING AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEMS.
FINALLY, COMPANIES CAN SIMPLY AVOID THE ACTIVITIES THAT GIVE RISE TO
RISK.
ANSWER: FINANCIAL RISK EXPOSURE REFERS TO THE RISK INHERENT IN THE FINANCIAL
MARKETS DUE TO PRICE FLUCTUATIONS.
Mini Case: 23 - 12
4. SWAPS INVOLVE THE EXCHANGE OF CASH PAYMENT OBLIGATIONS ON DEBT
BETWEEN TWO PARTIES, USUALLY BECAUSE EACH PARTY PREFERS THE TERMS
OF THE OTHER'S DEBT CONTRACT. SWAPS CAN REDUCE EACH FIRM'S
FINANCIAL RISK. FOR EXAMPLE, CURRENCY EXCHANGE RATE RISK CAN BE
ELIMINATED IF A U.S. FIRM WITH A POUND-DENOMINATED DEBT COULD SWAP
THEIR DEBT WITH A BRITISH FIRM THAT HAS AN EQUIVALENT DOLLAR-
DENOMINATED DEBT.
Mini Case: 23 - 13