Social Responsibility of Business
Social Responsibility of Business
Social Responsibility of Business
ADVERTISEMENTS:
Contents:
ADVERTISEMENTS:
ADVERTISEMENTS:
“Corporate Social Responsibility is the continuing commitment by
business to behave ethically and contribute to economic development
while improving the quality of life of the workforce and their families
as well as of the local community and society at large.” —The World
Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD).
ADVERTISEMENTS:
ADVERTISEMENTS:
ADVERTISEMENTS:
(ii) Making of serious attempts at growth and development of all the
factors of constituents of business from owners to consumers;
(iv) Utilization of surplus, if at all left over, for any other social
purpose deemed fit for assistance such as education and health. The
surplus may further be utilized for purposes which should not be
controversial and for which no new values should be setup by the
business community. The values stand already set by the society itself,
though there might be slight difference of opinion here and there in
regard to the emphasis to be placed on certain values.
ADVERTISEMENTS:
ADVERTISEMENTS:
The NAA Committee (1977) has identified four major areas of social
performance- community development, human resources, physical
resources and environmental contribution, and product or service
contributions. The responsibility of business itself indicates the desire
to ensure the optimum use of resources, development and expansion,
operation and management, promotion of research environment, and
environmental management etc.
They may also choose to decide the extent to which they would prefer
serving the interest groups. However, if a business aims for all-round
growth, there is no escape from assuming social responsibilities.
1. Long-Term Interest:
2. Indebted to Society:
A business uses the resources of the society for its functioning. Hence,
it becomes obligatory for it to pay back its dues by serving the society.
Businessmen should tend to the needs of the society and use its
resources for community welfare. This practice ultimately helps the
organization in establishing itself on the strong foundation of a
pleased society and a cooperative labour force.
3. Social Power:
Business persons are endowed with a lot of social power. They have
the potential to change the destiny of the population by collectively
deciding for the country on crucial issues such as rate of economic
progress, distribution of income among different income groups etc.
Ideally, business persons should take up social responsibilities in
proportion to their social power.
If the business enterprise misuses its social powers for selfish motives,
the society can intervene via government controls and other laws.
Therefore, it is morally right for a business to embrace its social
obligations and discharge them loyally.
4. Public Image:
5. Social Awareness:
These days, employees and customers are more informed about their
rights. While consumers expect the seller to abide by the fair trade
practices, workers want fair wages and other employee benefits. If the
expectations of these interest groups are not met, they may resort to
either anti-social activities or seek help from trade unions and
consumer courts. This will lead to industrial turmoil and unrest within
the society which is harmful for proper functioning of the business.
8. Moral Justification:
9. Socio-Cultural Norms:
10. Trusteeship:
The great socio-political leader Mahatma Gandhi propounded the
philosophy that owners of wealth and property should hold and use
the wealth for the welfare of the society. Therefore, company owners
should operate the business not only for their own benefit, but also for
the prosperity of the society. According to Keith Davis, since business
has the resources to resolve the mounting social problems, it should
try and assume the social responsibilities.
iii. It demands every business to conduct the show in the best interests
of society at large
iv. Businesses must make profits, but that cannot be at the cost of cus-
tomers.
(i) Environment
(ii) Energy
(vi) Product.
(i) Environment:
(ii) Energy:
This area covers conservation of energy in the conduct of business
operations and increasing the energy efficiency of the company’s
products.
(vi) Products:
This area concerns the qualitative aspects of the products, for example
their utility, life-durability, safety and serviceability, as well as their
effect on pollution. Moreover, it includes customer satisfaction,
truthfulness in advertising, completeness and clarity of labeling and
packaging. Many of these considerations are already important from a
marketing point of view. It is clear, however, that the social
responsibility aspect of the product contribution extends beyond what
is advantageous from a marketing angle.
1. Profit Maximisation:
2. Trusteeship Management:
During later years, the concept of social responsibility widened from
mere satisfaction of owners’ interest to interests of other stakeholders
also, like employees, consumers, creditors etc. Providing good working
conditions, goods of the right quality and quantity, timely repayment
of loans to creditors etc., were viewed as essential aspects of social
responsibility. Business managers were trustees of business property,
holding it in trust for the welfare of society.
1. Traditional Philosophy:
2. Stakeholder Philosophy:
3. Affirmative Philosophy:
Only a profitable business can expand, modernize, and even replace its
capital equipment to continue its operations. If the firm cannot show
profits in its operations, investors are highly reluctant to invest
additional funds in the enterprises. If the business were to experience
financial losses over a period of time, the firm would eventually
become bankrupt. An unprofitable firm is also a poor employer.
CSR will add to the cost of doing business. Because you are spending
on activities without any return. This will over-burden the consumer
in the form of higher prices. If the business has not spent on CSR, the
benefits would have been passed on to consumers in the form of low
prices, higher quality, better returns etc.
7. Anti-Business Rhetoric:
In the case of a firm, it has neither the necessary freedom nor the
appropriate standards of selection for pursuing many of the socially
desirable activities blessed by society. Social responsibility is clearly
anti-business rhetoric smuggled into the economic scene just to
mollify an angry public.
CSR does not mean that businesses have to stop creating wealth. CSR
simply wants the business to grow. It wants every business to conduct
the show in sync with societal expectations. It simply requires every
business to hold the hand of every member of society in one way or the
other. This can be started with by not polluting the environment, by
not indulging in black marketing, by not doing anything unethically
etc.
vii. Informing about adverse effects, if any, of the goods and services
being sold by the organisation.
A business organisation can run effectively only when the morale of its
employees is high and their needs are fully met.
Thus, no business enterprise, specially the big ones, should ignore its
social responsibility, if it has to function effectively. The enterprise
should be so managed as to make possible everything likely to
strengthen the society and lead to its betterment and prosperity.
Most of the organisations have failed to ensure that their goods reach
the consumer at fair prices. They hardly think in terms of welfare of
the society. They believe only in maximisation of profits and in their
pursuit to achieve this end they do not bother for means they make use
of. Thus, Indian managers, in general, are insensitive to the social
priorities.
They have shown little interest to various elements, nor could protect
the interest of customers or the society in general.
A.D. Moddie has rightly observed about the Indian manager that “his
style is Western, bureaucratic, affluent and aloof. He is a plutocrat in a
poor country, a high class man in a class conscious society seeking to
be egalitarian. Socially and educationally he has hardly any links with
his workforce, with the trade with the farmer. . . . The Indian manager
seems to suffer from the social responsibilities of a citizen, and he
takes the political environment for granted.
This isolation is perhaps his biggest weakness and may well reduce
rather than enhance his future influence in a society where he has an
island of ‘haves’ in an ocean of have-nots”
4. Attract Investors:
1. Managerial Perceptions:
4. International Barriers:
Preamble:
This also makes business sense as companies with effective CSR, have
image of socially responsible companies, achieve sustainable growth in
their operations in the long run and their products and services are
preferred by the customers. Indian entrepreneurs and business
enterprises have a long tradition of working within the values that
have defined our nation’s character for millennia.
While the guidelines have been prepared for the Indian context,
enterprises that have a trans-national presence would benefit from
using these guidelines for their overseas operations as well. Since the
guidelines are voluntary and not prepared in the nature of a
prescriptive road-map, they are not intended for regulatory or
contractual use.
Guidelines:
Fundamental Principle:
Core Elements:
2. Ethical Functioning:
Companies should respect human rights for all and avoid complicity
with human rights abuses by them or by third party.
They may influence the supply chain for CSR initiative and motivate
employees for voluntary effort for social development. They may
evolve a system of need assessment and impact assessment while
undertaking CSR activities in a particular area. Independent
evaluation may also be undertaken for selected projects/activities
from time to time.