Can Vs Be Able To
Can Vs Be Able To
Can Vs Be Able To
With the exception of the last question (which is, of course, a joke), you’ve probably
been asked something along these lines many times during your career as an online
tutor.
So in order to put all our students’ questions, concerns, fears, and nightmares about
this aspect of grammar to rest, we’ve compiled this ultimate guide to explaining “can”
and “be able to.”
1. Grammar-related differences
2. Meaning-related differences
3. Formality-related differences
We also have a summary at the end for those of you who want a one-minute version
of this post!
1. Grammar
The biggest difference between “can” and “be able to” is the grammar. If sentences
were puzzles, “be able to” would be the kind of puzzle piece that could be slotted into
many places, while “can” only fits in one.
In other words, a lot of times, “be able to” and “can” are interchangeable meaning-
wise, but people use “be able to” because using “can” wouldn’t make sense
grammatically!
When you want to talk about an ability someone might develop in the future, “be able
to” is the grammatical choice.
Using “can” when you are talking about a future ability would be confusing. For
example, if someone said “My daughter can walk in a few months,” the listener might
need some clarification: “So, can your daughter walk now? Or will she be able to walk
in a few months?”
(You might be wondering why both “I can come to your party” and “I’ll be able to come
to your party” are acceptable. That’s because these sentences are referring to
future plans – not abilities.)
Both “could” and “was able to” are used to talk about abilities people had in the past.
For example, the sentences below mean the same thing regardless of which option is
used.
When your grandma was young, she could/was able to eat five hamburgers in one
meal.
I couldn’t/wasn’t able to sleep last night.
But when specific events in the past are involved, things get tricky. For example, let’s
say that a university student named “Sally” has the ability to find a job in New York
after she graduates and she does just that.
Based on the logic above, many learners would guess that “Sally could find a job in
New York after graduating” is an acceptable way to express this thought. But it
doesn’t work, because “could” here isn’t the past tense of “can”; it’s
the conditional form. So this sentence actually means “Sally has the potential to find a
job after she graduates” but we don’t know if she will.
This is another time when “be able to” makes more sense than “can.”
Another time when only “be able to” is acceptable is after other verbs. Since “can” is
a modal verb , it can’t be used after other verbs.
“Applicants must can speak fluent French” and “I want to can help people” simply
sound weird.
As a modal verb, “can” also does not have a continuous (-ing) form or a perfect form .
So when a learner wants to talk about ability using another grammatical form (i.e.
tense or aspect), they’ll need to use “be able to.”
I wonder what it’s like not being able to swim.
She’s recovered her appetite and has been able to eat a lot more lately.
2. Meaning
In addition to the grammar, meaning is another important way that “can” and “be able
to” differ.
Sometimes, learners will write sentences like “Tickets are able to be purchased
online” or “This product is able to be used in a microwave.” These sentences probably
sound weird to you. After all, tickets and products don’t really have abilities! That’s
why “can” sounds more natural in these cases.
A trick you can teach students is that when deciding between “be able to” and “can”
(and after considering the grammatical aspects), they can try phrasing the sentence
with “have the ability.” If the sentence makes sense, then they can use “be able to.” If
not, they should stick with “can.”
For example, the following sentences wouldn’t make sense with “be able to,” because
heart disease doesn’t “have the ability” to cause itself and birds don’t “have the
ability” to be found.
3. Formality
Finally, the last way in which “be able to” and “can” differ is in formality. While they’re
both used in everyday conversations for the reasons we’ve discussed above
(grammar and meaning), “be able to” is more common in formal English.
After all, formal English – especially writing – calls for specificity. This is why you’ll
see “be able to” more often than “can” in news articles that mention ability.
In addition, “be able to” sounds more indirect and impersonal than “can.” This is why
automated messages from computer programs often use “able to” instead of “can.”
We are unable to process your request at this time. Please try again later.
Please do not reply to this email, as we are unable to respond from this address.
However, we wouldn’t recommend dwelling on formality too much. For one, standards
for formality change. For example, automated messages seem to be using “can” more
and more these days (e.g. “Cannot connect to this network, “Cannot connect to the
app store,” etc).
Further, overemphasizing formality may lead students to think that they should only
use “can” in informal contexts and “be able to” in formal ones when grammar and
meaning should play a much bigger role in this decision.
📌 Takeaways
1. Grammar
“Be able to” is more flexible. It can be used with any verb and tense!
“Was able to” is used for successful one-time events in the past.
2. Meaning
Use “can” for subjects that don’t have abilities.
Phrase sentences using “have the ability” to see if they would make sense with
“be able to.”
3. Formality
Compared to grammar and meaning, formality plays a smaller role in deciding
whether to use “be able to” or “can.”
“Be able to” is more common in formal contexts.
We hope this guide helps you the next time you need to explain this to a student.
Happy tutoring!