The Body Shop Company
The Body Shop Company
The Body Shop Company
Student’s Number
Tutor Name
The Body Shop Company: Strategic Analysis 2
Table of Contents
Introduction........................................................................................................................3
SWOT Analysis..............................................................................................................4
Strategic Analysis.............................................................................................................11
Recommendations............................................................................................................14
Conclusion........................................................................................................................14
References.........................................................................................................................16
APPENDIX:......................................................................................................................19
The Body Shop Company: Strategic Analysis 3
Introduction
This paper employs appropriate strategic managerial tools to evaluate the strategic
position of The Body Shop Company. The company has fairly performed well, with a 1.7% rise
in sales in 2018 to £797.5m from the previous year(Fleischmann, Ferber, & Henrich, 2006). It is
also enjoying a large market share served in 66 countries and over 3249 stores globally. The
paper particularly employs the company’s SWOT analysis to unveil the informed performance of
the company. The paper is structured as follows. It preliminarily begins by describing the profile
of the company in question, giving such details as the nature of business it conducts, the date it
was founded as well as other basic descriptive details. Secondly, the paper evaluates the
company’s current strategy based on the SWOT analysis of the firm. Thirdly, the paper discusses
the performance of the currently employed strategy in terms of such aspects as sales trends,
profits, and market share. Fourthly, this work unveils how the company competes, whether it is
oriented towards differentiation focus or cost focus strategies. It also discusses how the strategic
direction of the company is related to growth, innovation or global expansion. Based on SWOT,
this paper then votes as to whether the strategy is suitable or is not. Following is an evaluation of
the potential for recent government changes to affect the strategy in place. Any implications of
Brexit and the retarding UK economy are also evaluated. The work culminates in a
recommendation of any likely strategic improvements. Lastly, the work ends in a conclusion that
The Body Shop International(McGregor, 2016), whose trade name is The Body Shop, is a
British company that deals in cosmetics, perfume and skin care. The company was founded in
the year 1976 by Dame Anita Roddick. The company’s vision and mission is to dedicate their
business towards social and environmental change. Presently, the company has a range of about
1000 products selling in established stores. Globally, the company has over 3050 stores fully
owned or franchised across 66 countries. The firm is situated in East Croydon as well as
Littlehampton in West Sussex. The Company was owned by a French cosmetics company:
L’Ore`al between 2006-2017, after which it was wholly acquired by Natura(Holcomb & Hutton,
2016), a Brazilian company dealing in the same industry. The company defines itself as
committed to be the world’s most ethical and sustainable business. The company particularly
stands against animal testing, and has thus launched campaigns within the UK, the European
Union recently, and also aims to do the same with the UN. The firm terms the practice as cruel,
showing its priority for ethics and sustainability(Wycherley, 2002) in the industry. The British
founded cosmetics company continues to operate in many countries across the planet’s
continents. They have presence in UK, Belgium, Australia, South Africa, Japan, Denmark, Chile,
India, Italy, Mexico, and Canada among other countries in every continent across the globe.
SWOT Analysis
In conducting a SWOT analysis(Chun, 2016), this section identifies the inherent strengths
of the company, its weaknesses, as well as the external environment factors that pose threats as
well as opportunities.
Strengths
o The internal factors that body Shop Company has as strengths include its compliance to
o The company also has a substantial market presence, having presence in over 66
countries in the world as a vastly diversified business and hence has the benefit of a broad
o The company has enjoyed good growing profits for many years in a row and thus the
o The Body Shop (TBS) Limited also enjoys the strength of the current strong management
intent which is seeking to re-position the company as it was in its activist days within the
industry.
Weaknesses
o Loss of focus due to the over-commitment to the environment and animal protection.
o Opportunities for the company include their access to broader markets than its
competitors, and bearing in mind that the firm belongs to the largest cosmetic company
o Pricing. The cosmetics chain charges premiums for its products which yet do not much
Opportunities
o Opportunities include that the growing millennial population that is health conscious,
matching the nature of the products of TBS. The firm also stands a good ground of
Threats
Porter defined a framework for strategic analysis and which shows the five challenges
that any firm faces. In the case of The Body Shop, the following factors are crucial. The
company faces threats of new market entrants(Robertson, 2012) who are seemingly drawing the
bigger market share away from the company. The Cosmetics chain also suffers industrial rivalry
such as by brands like Yves Rocher and Lush which have claimed a large share of the industry’s
market. Yves produces similar products as TBS, and has a good presence in the market with up
to 1200 stores. In accordance to Porter’s model, the company also suffers the challenge of buyer
bargaining power. There being emergent brands with modern and trending products offered at
In the perspective of the VRIO model(Cardeal, 2012), The Beauty Shop’s position is as
follows. In the sense of value, based on its products prices, the brand is certainly valuable hence
a competitive edge for the brand. Its products are relatively rare, based on their environmental
value. The company’s products however are easily imitable and hence the firm has only a
diversification strategy. The organization’s management has in recent days implemented growth-
in more countries globally. In fact, in the early 2019, the company has also established its
presence in Serbia, after it had just entered new global markets in Bangladesh, Slovenia, and
Cyprus in the year 2017; and Chile in 2016 (Inagami, Cohen, Finch, & Asch, 2006). The
corporate strategy of the cosmetics company is well manifested in the aggressive global
expansion, having established facilities in 9 new countries within a span of 7 years (2012-2019).
The Body Shop has particularly been empowered to engage in the global growth
diversification strategy by its inherent financial stability and profitability as observed over the
years. The financial grounding of the company must have served as a significant enabling factor
for the resource-intensive strategy. The entrance of the company into new countries across the
globe has been characteristic of its healthy business conduct in the recent years. Other
opportunities exist and which the company has been exploiting in its global expansions. These
include that multiple states and individuals as well as non-governmental organizations are
advocating for green business practices. Therefore, TBS, being a champion of green and
sustainable business practices(Chun, 2016) driven by a strong sense of social responsibility has
been a great asset for the penetration into new markets since the potential markets already
“invite” such merchants who have care for the natural environment. The growth strategy under
implementation in the company is a strategic move that the management has embarked on in a
bid to strain the seemingly expanding efforts of competitors(Kotler & Zeithaml, 2000). To keep
its name as the trending and loudest in the industry against such competitors as Lush, the
company has had to respond by attacking new grounds where they can stand tall as a superior
cosmetics company and to make-up for any unhealthy effects of the cutthroat competition in
ancient markets.
The Body Shop Company: Strategic Analysis 8
Knopoff, & Beckman, 2006). Nevertheless, other than correcting this noted weakness in its
business, the growth strategy is also positively exploiting the vast capacity of Natura: the world’s
biggest cosmetics company and owner of TBS. However, the strategy has not only been straight,
easy and non-challenging the company has also suffered a higher cost of operating multiple
shops worldwide, in a globe where different governments offer different tariffs amidst the face of
differing tastes and stiff competition from resident and “louder” native firms. The additional
(managerial and operating) cost due to large volume of international operation is also suspect for
The strategy is reportedly performing well in most of the operating markets. Its trend of
sales stands out and is commendable. TBS has had rising sales most of the time, showing a
preference for the company’s products. In a recent research, it was identified that 64% of
customers are very willing to pay for products that are compliant to ethics(Kent & Stone, 2007).
The company has also enjoyed rising sales courtesy of its online multilevel marketing network
that lets the company operate beyond its physical facilities. The internet based marketing has
been dabbed: The Body Shop at home. The online marketing channel comprises of numerous
distributors and consultants who recruit people and market the product in multiple countries yet
virtually. The expansion strategy has undeniably enjoyed a resultant positive rise in sales volume
and revenues.
The company has enjoyed a long time of a substantial market share for many years.
Having been so aggressive in expanding their operations across the world, the company has
assuredly gotten hold of a large global market share(Fleischmann et al., 2006). Nonetheless, the
The Body Shop Company: Strategic Analysis 9
Body Shop at home networking channel has also earned the company so much more market
reach where individuals recruit people as both consumers and network marketers for a benefit of
personal discounts of up to 25% and commissions of 25% for individuals promoting the activity.
At present, the company is actively operating physical presence in over 66 countries across the
world(Inagami et al., 2006) in all continents. This translates to about 33% of all the entire global
market. As a result, it is expected that the company can only have possession and command over
a substantial market in the world. The internet based multilevel marketing activity that serves
participants as a way of generating personal income has also been a sustainable way of
facilitating wider market reach in the world. This implies that the firm has a higher market reach
Nonetheless, the globalisation strategy has not just worked without hitches here and
there. Rather, the cosmetics commander has also struggled with present challenges in the
seemingly unstoppable and popular is a serious challenge for the retailing cosmetics company.
This challenge and the increasing number of shops which all muscle on the same territory inhibit
tranquillity of business alike. The economic forces of demand and supply(Guerras-Martin &
Ronda-Pupo, 2016) in cases like these come no effect and as expected, a rise in the number of
sellers amidst a constancy in the size of the market leads to possibly declining sales volume per
seller, given the other factors are held constant and so buyers can freely switch between
products. In this situation, The Body Shop has found a number of its ventures suffering a loss of
market holding to new entrants and existing competitors who provide similar
products(Management and Strategic Studies Center, 2012). The cost of running multiple shops
also posits an operational as managerial challenges. Indeed, it is unlikely that one can ever
The Body Shop Company: Strategic Analysis 10
underestimate the complexity of managing global ventures. There exist numerous and yet tough
managerial and operational challenges when it comes to the running of business ventures in
disparate global locations. These arise from challenges such as variations in culture from place to
place, the difference in government policies, different patterns of consumption amongst other
contemporary challenges in global markets(Robertson, 2012). The cosmetics chain can therefore
attribute several challenges in its markets across the world as resultant of the strategic move of
expansion.
profits that have fairly grown over the years. In a background marked by an exponential growth
of new businesses and a paradigm shift in business models where retailers have moved online to
sell on e-commerce platforms to satisfy the current preferences of buyers, it is only expansion of
activity that could have earned this relatively “ageing” company a positive trend in profits(Kotler
& Zeithaml, 2000). In the present era, buyers have so many alternatives within the comfort of
their handsets such that they need not stick to a single brand or retailer branch. With the bigger
portion of markets switching to online shop stores, it is likely that an industry player can easily
run out of market as customers shift away to global premium brands available over the internet.
The expansion strategy of TBS has therefore warranted the continued profitability for the
company, enjoying returns “away from home(Inagami et al., 2006).” Had the company not
engaged the global markets, the overwhelming threats in the industry as identified by SWOT and
Porter’s 5 forces model would have crunched its capacity to earn profits.
1963) as its marketing strategy over the years. The organization has done so by continuing in the
production of unique cosmetic and toiletry products that are distinguished by their orientation
The Body Shop Company: Strategic Analysis 11
towards production of premium environment friendly products that aim at sustainable business
practice. In its campaigns, The Body Shop(Robertson, 2012) has previously proclaimed the
abolition of animal testing, as a brand and in the entire UK cosmetics industry. The brand is
recognized as an activist brand for ethics and sustainability in the cosmetics industry. TBS thus
only produces, markets and sells products that are compliant to the features highlighted in the
company’s core values. By doing so, the firm has attracted numerous buyers and
acknowledgement by other bodies: state and non-state bodies. This has therefore been a unique
competitive factor for the company attracting buyers that have a preference for quality and
Strategic Analysis
The strategic direction of the cosmetics chain is closely intertwined with growth. The
company’s globalization strategy has been clearly expanding the firm’s operations all over the
world and hence ensuring a continued growth of the company. Specifically, the company has not
only been committed to growth but has intentionally engaged international expansion where it
The ANSOFF Matrix(Hussain, Khattak, Rizwan, & Latif, 2013) shown above is crucial
for the identification of the relation of the organization’s strategic direction to growth,
innovation, as well as international expansion. The Body Shop has been clearly aggressive in its
market development efforts. The cosmetics chain has particularly focused on penetrating new
markets(Kotler & Zeithaml, 2000) to increase its marketing efforts. This is a common strategy
employed by multiple business since it banks on the benefits that include less risks as well as
enjoying the benefit of the already established products rather than making new products. By
using this marketing strategy, the company has achieved growth in operations and in its market
reach. The firm’s marketing strategy has also included market penetration efforts which has led
for its special situation. The cosmetics chain has been enjoying positive results from its
expansion to overseas locations and can only keep doing so. Nonetheless, based on the firm’s
SWOT analysis(Rumelt, Schendel, & Teece, 1991), the firm is justified in implementing its
strategy since it also has a substantial capacity to do so. The strategy is considerably feasible
particularly due to the legal backing it enjoys. Being acknowledged as a sustainable champion,
there is sufficient legal as well political feasibility for the strategy in any new market the brand
moves to. The financial wellbeing of the organization that provides sufficient capacity to expand
globally is the needful economic feasibility of the strategy. Nonetheless, the company’s
management possesses the capacity to drive the companies on its feet across the globe; hence
further approving the expansion(Kotler & Zeithaml, 2000) efforts already noted. Having
Recent government changes are some of the present concerns that the company must also
give attention to. For instance, the UK government’s state agencies for the conservation of the
environment and the conduct of sustainable business have been so aggressive in advocating for
sustainability in the various industries in the industries(Wycherley, 2002). This has also been
vibrant and widely adopted in more countries across the world where TBS also operates as well
as by global agencies like the UNEP. These developments have the potential to affect the
cosmetics chain, but they are only likely to do so positively. TBS is already a highly ethical
business which is also currently aggressive to reassure its ethical practice. The company must
harness these campaigns to their advantage as well as turn it into a competitive advantage against
The Body Shop Company: Strategic Analysis 14
industry rivals. Brexit as well as UK’s slow economic growth imply bad economic times for the
company. however, the company must take on any initiatives to facilitate their business in the
midst of economic recession to rise over the looming stagnation in the region’s
economy(Wycherley, 2002). An advantage, however, is that the chain has business presence in
Recommendations
The Body Shop, even though has been doing well, needs to make some strategic
improvement to up their game. Specifically, the management must perform redemptive activity
to save the cosmetics chain from the damage it got from L’Oreal’s ownership. Business
consultants have complained that the brand had slightly lost its trajectory under the previous
ownership. This will be necessary to restore the old faded trust. Nonetheless, the company must
embrace innovation to keep up with market trends. Online sources consisting of customer
reviews claim that the brand is presently not as fashionable as the times dictate. It must therefore
add innovation to its product development marketing strategy. An emphasis on innovation would
grant the firm a distinguished competitive position against rivals. The company must also
enhance its products value as to enhance the value proposition, decrease likelihood of imitation
and enhance competitiveness. The firm must also revise its prices to match the perceived value
by buyers and to match current industry prices. Most importantly, the company must not over-
Conclusion
globalisation strategy implementation. The strategy’s implementation has granted the firm
cognizable benefits in performance such as the growth of sales as well as profits. The company
The Body Shop Company: Strategic Analysis 15
has gotten hold of a substantial market share and fairly competes with an orientation to
differentiation focus. It’s strategic direction highlights product development and market
penetration as the prevalent marketing strategies. The strategy is suitable for the company.
However, in consideration to existing challenges and prevailing developments in the market, the
company must now take up on strategic innovation focus to improve products and match market
trends.
The Body Shop Company: Strategic Analysis 16
References
Burritt, R. L., & Lehman, G. (1995). The body shop wind farm—an analysis of accountability
Cardeal, N. (2012). Valuable, rare, inimitable resources and organization (VRIO) resources or
https://doi.org/10.5897/AJBM12.295
Chun, R. (2016). What Holds Ethical Consumers to a Cosmetics Brand: The Body Shop Case.
Fleischmann, B., Ferber, S., & Henrich, P. (2006). Strategic planning of BMW’s global
2_565-1
Holcomb, J. M., & Hutton, R. B. (2016). The Body Shop International. Proceedings of the
https://doi.org/10.5840/iabsproc1997878
Hussain, S., Khattak, J., Rizwan, A., & Latif, M. A. (2013). ANSOFF Matrix, Environment, and
Inagami, S., Cohen, D. A., Finch, B. K., & Asch, S. M. (2006). You Are Where You Shop.
Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2006.03.019
Kent, T., & Stone, D. (2007). The Body Shop and the role of design in retail branding.
https://doi.org/10.1108/09590550710755912
Kotler, P., & Zeithaml, V. (2000). Marketing Management , Millenium Edition. Marketing
Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-6301(90)90145-T
Management and Strategic Studies Center. (2012). Redes Elétricas Inteligentes: Contexto
Martin, J., Knopoff, K., & Beckman, C. (2006). An Alternative to Bureaucratic Impersonality
and Emotional Labor: Bounded Emotionality at The Body Shop. Administrative Science
Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393858
Peter, J. P., & Olson, J. C. (1999). Consumer behavior and marketing strategy. London:
McGraw-Hill.
Rumelt, R. P., Schendel, D., & Teece, D. J. (1991). Strategic management and economics.
The Body Shop Company: Strategic Analysis 18
Schawel, C., Billing, F., Schawel, C., & Billing, F. (2009). Ansoff-Matrix. In Top 100
https://doi.org/10.1504/IJASM.2006.010942
Wycherley, I. (2002). Greening supply chains: the case of The Body Shop International.
0836(199903/04)8:2<120::aid-bse188>3.3.co;2-o
The Body Shop Company: Strategic Analysis 19
APPENDIX:
Appendix 1