Article Review, Leela Dubey's Essay
Article Review, Leela Dubey's Essay
Article Review, Leela Dubey's Essay
eye opener into the process through which women in India acquires notions on their duties, roles
and values ;the role played by rituals in imbibing these ideas; how practice of patriliny and patrilocal
residence affects women's status in the family etc. It is a fine portrayal of this “cultural imprinting” or
conditioning that women in India go through. Dube, being an anthropologist have milked diverse
sources and regions and used data and insights to substantiate her arguments. In addition to that
her personal experiences are often cited which makes the essay even more interesting. It is to be
noted that, in her essay she says the specification of “Hindu Girls” is because she herself belong to a
Hindu household.
Patriliny often try to ascribe women with a secondary role in the ‘perpetuation of the group’. She
points out that practicing patrilocal residence has serious implications such as pricing the son rather
than daughter and having less incentive to invest in daughter’s education as the son is supposed to
support his parents in their old age. Dube clearly depicts how as they grow up, women imbibe
through rituals such as Durga Puja and Gauri Puja, the idea that leaving the natal home after
marriage and marriage by itself is inevitable and that they have hardly have any autonomy in visiting
their natal home after marriage. Hindu rituals ascribe purity to pre – pubertal phase of a girl. But
once they hit their puberty, they are faced with ritual seclusions, restrictions on mobility, and on
interaction with males and thus projecting the idea of their “vulnerability”. Rituals associated with
menarche are often eager to control their sexuality and emphasize the notion of motherhood as
inevitable and fulfilling. Several practices that we take for granted in fact perpetuates notions that
marriage is inescapable, the married state of a women is ‘auspicious' and widowhood is
‘inauspicious'. Women are constantly conditioned to speak in a ‘proper' mode, shape the
‘acceptable’ demeanor and behavior and safeguard their ‘purity'. Imposing space and time
constraints on women are in fact attempts to control their sexuality. But this in turn pull back
women from choosing a college or career which would defy these ‘unwritten rules'. A point that
struck my mind was that assigning male and female children with tasks of different nature, and
providing them different toys to play with asserts the sexual division of labour within the family. In
addition to this, girl children are conditioned to ‘bear pain and deprival'. It is important to note how
ideas of sacrifice and self denial are projected as obligations on women.
After reading this essay, I became more keen on observing what every day practices, religious rituals
etc try to teach each individual in terms of values duties, and the right behavior. I realized that these
would turn problematic and oppressive to female population and places them in a disadvantaged
position. Likewise a reader of this article might refrain from considering any of these as the ‘ natural
order of things', but as socially constructed.