Refusal of Summons
Refusal of Summons
Refusal of Summons
Summons though Whatsapp:- In Tata Sons Limited & Ors vs John Does, 4His Lordship Justice
Rajiv Sahai Endlaw of the Hon’ble Delhi High Court permitted the right to serve summons to the
defendant via Whatsapp texts as well as by emails to a defendant.
Refusal of summons
1
(2010) 10 SCC 280]
2
(2009) scc 340
3
(2014) 5 SCC 590
4
CS(COMM) 1601/2016
Where the defendant refuses to accept summons, he is deemed to have been served. Similarly,
where an acknowledgement or receipt purported to have been signed by the defendant( or his
agent) is received by the court that the defendant (or his agent) has refused to take the delivery of
summons, the court will proceed treating the defendant as served.5
It has been held that there is distinction between non-service of notice and procedural irregularity
in service of notice. In the case of former category of cases, all consequential actions would be
rendered bad in law whereas in the case of latter category of cases, consequential actions would
be sustained unless he is able to show substantial prejudice due to procedural lapse in making
service to him. It depends upon the facts of each case whether procedural lapse complained of
has caused prejudice to the applicant.6
Where the defendant resides out of India and has no authorized agent in India to accept service,
the summons sh
5
Puwada venkateswar v. chidamana venkata, 1976 scc 409
6
Prabin ram phukan v. state of assam 2015 scc 605