Pak. J. Bot., 44(1): 27-31, 2012.

CONTRIBUTION TO THE RED LIST OF PAKISTAN: A CASE STUDY OF

DELPHINIUM NORDHAGENII (RANUNCULACEAE)
HAIDAR ALI1, M. QAISER2 AND K.B. MARWAT3
1
Centre of Botany and Biodiversity Conservation, University of Swat, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan
2
Federal Urdu University for Arts, Science and Technology, Karachi / Islamabad, Pakistan
3
Agricultural University Peshawar, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan

Abstract

Delphinium nordhagenii Wendelbo (Ranunculaceae) is endemic to District Chitral, Pakistan. This taxon was previously
known from 2 localities of Barum Gol and Sher Ghora. After three years of continuous field studies during 2005-2007, five
new localities were discovered. According to its population size and number of localities reported, 624 mature individuals
were found in 5 localities in 2005, 275 mature individuals were found in 2006 and 184 mature individuals were found in
2007. The main threat posed to the existence of the taxon is its habitat destruction. In 3 localities i.e., Torikhoo-Chato Doke
Ghari, Mastooj-Shandoor Top and Torikhoo-Khoot Ghari, 28.57%, 10.12% and 36.12% decrease has been observed in its
population size, respectively, caused by grazing, soil erosion resulted from deforestation and agricultural land extensions. In
view of its extent of occurrence of 293.77km2, area of occupancy of 20 km2 and population size of 184 mature individuals,
the taxon is placed under the category of critically endangered (CR).

Introduction flowering plant species known from Pakistan. Beside this

no comprehensive field data regarding the trends in
Wild plants are rapidly disappearing due to population size and local threats are given (Ali & Qaiser,
tremendous increase in human population, urbanization, 2010b).
habitat fragmentation and the increased dependency of According to IUCN (Anon., 2001) for determining
the poor on the limited natural resources (Western, the conservation status of a taxon, it is necessary to
2001; Woodruff, 2001). As a result of these monitor the fluctuation in the population size, the extent
anthropogenic activities, the rate of plant extinction has of occurrence (EOO), the area of occupancy (AOO) and
reached to one species per day. This rate is considered to the nature and extent of threats faced by the taxon. In this
be 1000-10000 times faster than could naturally occur context, endemic taxa deserve special attention because of
(Hilton-Taylor, 2000) and if the trend remains constant, their limited geographic distribution and any unfavorable
60,000 to 100,000 plant species would disappear during change in the habitat might hinder their whole population
the next 50 years (Pujol et al., 2006). It is expected that as a result the taxon may face the process of extinction
as many as half of the world’s plant species would be (Callmander et al., 2005). However, these populations are
threatened by extinction if assessment is made according under the fundamental evolutionary processes that give
to the categories and criteria of IUCN (Pitman & birth to new species or relict taxa (Mauchamp et al.,
Jørgensen, 2002). 1998). Hence, endemic and rare species, particularly
For Pakistan a total of 1572 genera and 5521 species narrow endemic species deserve our immediate attention.
of flowering plants are identified (Ali, 2008) but no Most of the flowering plant diversity is confined to
comprehensive field research based Red List is present for the mountainous areas in Pakistan (Ali & Qaiser, 1986).
the country (Ali & Qaiser, 2010a). On the other hand, Therefore, there is dire need of extensive plant collection
Pakistan is under tremendous pressure concerning its in these biodiversity rich mountain areas of Pakistan.
population explosion, unplanned urbanization, About 80% of the endemic flowering plants are confined
deforestation and over-exploitation of natural resources to the northern and western mountains of Pakistan and
(Ali, 2000). Unfortunately, no critical work has been done Kashmir (Ali, 2008). Beside N. Baluchistan and Sino-
on threatened plants of Pakistan and very little Japanese region of Kashmir, Chitral is at third position
information is available on this subject (Alam & Ali, regarding the number of endemic taxa with 34 species
2009). Though herbarium based studies were conducted (9.1%) and is recognized as the centre of radiation (Ali &
by Nasir (1991) who estimated 580-650 flowering plant Qaiser, 1986).
species (i.e. 12%) were threatened at national level. But Chitral is the largest district of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
this assessment was not based on any criteria. Similarly with a total of 14850 km2 covering 20% of the provincial
14 flowering plant species are listed as threatened from landscape. It lies between 35˚15′ 00″ to 36˚55′ 32″ N and
Pakistan by Walter & Gillet (1998) in IUCN Red Data 71˚11′ 32″ to 73˚51′ 03″ E (Anon., 1998). It is located in
List. Among which 2 are considered as extinct, 2 the extreme north-east, parallel to the pan-handle shaped
endangered, 2 vulnerable, 5 rare and 5 indeterminate. Wakhan corridor of Afghanistan.
While in the current red list (Anon., 2009), 19 species are The aim of the present study was to study the
listed from Pakistan. Of these, 2 are vulnerable, 13 lower geographic distribution, evaluate the conservation status
risks/least concern, 1 near threatened and the remaining 3 and identify threats to the population and recommend
were classified as data deficient. But this seems to be measures for steady conservation of Delphinium
underestimation as it is only 0.3% of the total number of nordhagenii.
28 HAIDAR ALI ET AL.,

Materials and Methods the field. Various anthropogenic threats like grazing,
agricultural land extension and deforestation were also
Comprehensive field studies were conducted from studied. Grazed individuals were counted and tabulated
19th May 2005 to 30th September 2005; from 1st May to for each locality. Plant specimens collected were
30th September 2006 and from 1st June to 30th September, deposited at Karachi University Herbarium (KUH). For
2007. Studies were conducted in lower Chitral in May and EOO the geographical coordinates were plotted on a
June while upper Chitral was studied from July till the georeferenced imagery obtained from Google (2009) in
end of September, because of the inaccessibility (snow ArcView v.9.3 and a polygon was prepared by
bound area) and also the lack of flowering period. Special encompassing line through all the known localities of the
attention was paid to those localities from where the taxon taxon, excluding the localities which come inside the
was previously collected and to the inaccessible and boundary of the polygon. Similarly the AOO was
previously non-visited localities during long excursions of calculated by the presence of the taxon in a grid of 4km2
7-10 days campaign in these areas. These excursions were area. All the data collected were analyzed in view of
conducted with the help of local guides and porters, using IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria (Anon., 2001).
horses or sometimes yak for transportation of plant
specimens. The routs followed were localized by using Results and Discussion
GPS (Lowrance, iFinder), altimeter and a topographic
map (scale, 1:50,000, provided by survey of Pakistan). In Delphinium nordhagenii is a perennial herb, growing
addition to this the taxon was also searched in other in steep rock slopes. This taxon was previously known
localities containing the same altitudinal range and habitat from two localities: Chitral, Barum Gol, 12,000 feet, I.I.
in order to get the whole range of its distribution. When a Chaudhri 164 (RAW); Sher Ghora, Ras Gul 10451
population was located an additional 1-2 days were spent (KUH) (from Riedl & Nasir, 1991: 56). Although we
to determine the extent of the population by walking could not find the taxon in these reported localities but
extensively in an area of at least 1-2 km2 around each have been able to find it from 5 more localities (Table 1).
population. For population size, mature individuals were Delphinium nordhagenii is a Hemicryphyte (following
counted in each locality. Those individuals were Raunkier, 1934) plant height ranges up to 30 cm. Its
considered as mature which contained fruits or flowers. altitudinal range varies between 3471 to 4230 m (Table
Comprehensive field notes like, habit, habitat, life form, 1). Flowering and fruiting was observed in July-August.
phenological status and altitudinal range was studied in

Table 1. Delphinium nordhagenii: locality, GPS value, altitude, habitat, population size and number of grazed individuals.
Locality Alti. GPS value (UTM) Population size Grazed individuals
Locality
No. (m) E-N 2005 2006 2007 2005 2006 2007
1. Molikhoo-Attahk Terich 3471 43-230941, 4022581 5 14 87 4 10 70
2. Torikhoo-Chato Doke Ghari 3733 43-286873, 4045492 7 44 2 - - -
3. Mastooj-Shandoor Top 4223 43-280916, 3994105 79 41 8 50 32 -
4. Torikhoo-Shekhlasht Khote 3914 43-288135, 4046066 36 65 44 9 5 -
5. Torikhoo-Khote Ghari 4230 43-287765, 4046947 191 111 69 45 7 3
Total 624 275 184 108 54 73
Average 361 78.33

As the Extent of Occurrence of the taxon is 293.77 It’s population size is 184 (i.e. less than 250 mature
km2 (i.e., less than 5000km2), Area of Occupancy is 20 km2 individuals). In addition, the subpopulations are also
(i.e. less than 500km2) therefore it should be placed under severely fragmented i.e. distributed in 5 small localities
the Endangered Category. A total of 624 mature individual (Figs. 1, 2 & 3). Furthermore, due to continuing decline in
plants were observed in 2005, 275 in 2006 and 184 in 2007, number of mature individuals i.e., 329 mature individual
with an average of 361 mature individual plants per year. plants (70.50%) decreased from 624 in 2005 to 184 in
Fluctuation is observed in the population size, with 2007 (Table 1), this taxon is placed under Critically
decrease of 349 mature individual plants (55.92%) in the Endangered Category. These results of low population
second year, while further decrease of only 91 mature size with continuing decline and extreme fluctuation
individual plants (33.09%) during the third year. Hence, a collectively suggest the category of Critically Endangered
total decrease of 440 mature individual plants (70.51%) according to the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria
was observed during the three years of study. Therefore, it (Anon., 2001).
is a rare species with extreme fluctuation in population size Hierarchical Alpha Numeric Numbering System is as:
in all the localities (Table 1).
CR C 1 2 b
where:
CR = Critically Endangered
C = Population size estimated to number fewer than 2500 mature individuals and either:
1 = An estimated continuing decline of at least 25% within three years
2 = a= Continuing decline observed in number of mature individuals
b= Extreme fluctuation in number of mature individuals
RED LIST OF PAKISTANI DELPHINIUM NORDHAGENII 29

A 
Fig. 1. Delphinium nordhagenii: A, habit; B, flower close up.

Fig. 2. Delphinium nordhagenii: extensively grazed individual.

30 HAIDAR ALI ET AL.,

Fig. 3. Distribution of Delphinium nordhagenii during 2005-2007, number corresponds with the localities in the table.

Adequate plant collections with good field variety of reasons, one among the most important being
observation notes may play a critical role in assessing the destruction of their habitat (Lende, 1988; Schemske et
conservation status, conservation priorities, or changes al., 1994; Romeo et al., 1994; Sala, et al., 2000,
over time in species frequency (Burgman et al., 1995; Bernardes et al., 2006).
MacDougall et al., 1998; Funk et al., 1999; Steege et al., In Chitral valley, habitat loss is a serious problem,
2000; Golding, 2001; Hedenas et al., 2002; Schatz, 2002; mainly due to agricultural land expansions, deforestations,
Willis et al., 2003; Ungricht et al., 2005), but various grazing pressure, developmental activities and
collection biases may hamper its basic goal and lead to environmental degradation. If these circumstances
various misconceptions. In addition, it is also possible that continue, an irreversible loss of many species would
the previously documented populations might no longer occur, mainly of those which are found in Alpine and
exist in nature. Since the number of available collections
Subalpine regions. Earlier measures for the conservation
and the evenness of collecting localities across ecological
of these plant resources are urgently needed. Delphinium
zones further hinder the problem of assessing
conservation status. Based solely on the Herbarium nordhagenii is endemic to Chitral (Riedl & Nasir, 1991)
specimens data using the IUCN categories and criteria can and is categorized as Critically Endangered.
be misleading if proper field knowledge is not taken into In order to obtain the benefits in a sustainable manner
account (Randrianasolo et al., 2002), especially for the not only at local level but also at global level, it is the
areas like Chitral which is very hard to reach and plant responsibility of the state to conserve their biodiversity.
collection from the remote localities sometimes seems Hence, it is necessary to identify important components of
almost impossible. Therefore, the evaluation of biodiversity and identify priorities which may need
conservation status based on herbarium specimens must special conservation measures (Glowka et al., 1994).
be accompanied with the field observations taken Pakistan became signatory of CBD in 1992 and ratified
continuously for at least three years in order to confirm by the cabinet in 1994. In order to meet the objectives of
the existence of the taxon in the wild (Ali & Qaiser, CBD, Pakistan has developed Biodiversity Action Plan
2011). Otherwise the evaluation will be misleading. (BAP) in 2000 but up till now Pakistan has not yet
According to the IUCN Red Data List Categories and approached biodiversity planning and implementation in
Criteria (Anon., 2001) a taxon should be accessed the comprehensive and integrated manner was required by
throughout its whole range of distribution, but due to the the convention (Anon., 2000).
security situation and political constraints the national level These results obtained from the study area may well
assessment are also given due consideration (Anon., 2003). depict the conditions prevailing over most other parts of
The extreme fragmentation of species distribution the country and can be used as a baseline study for the
appears to be the characteristic of areas of high endemics, future biodiversity management.
poses a grave dilemma for conservation (Ashton, 1981).
Narrow endemics are susceptible to extinction for a
RED LIST OF PAKISTANI DELPHINIUM NORDHAGENII 31

References estimates of temporal frequency changes: Mosses in

Sweden. Biological Conservation, 105: 321-331.
Alam. J. and S.I. Ali. 2009. Conservation status of Astragalus Hilton-Taylor, C. 2000. 2000 IUCN Red List of Threatened
gilgitensis Ali: a critically endangered species in Gilgit Species. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK.
district, Pakistan. Phyton (Horn, Austria). 48: 211-223. Lende, R. 1988. Genetic and demography in biography in
Ali, H. and M. Qaiser, 2010b. Contribution to the Red List of biological conservation. Science, 241: 1455-1460.
Pakistan: a case study of Gaillonia chitralensis Macdougall, A.S., J.A. Loo, S.R. Clayden, J.G. Goltz and H.R.
(Rubiaceae). Pak. J. Bot., Special Issue (S.I. Ali Festschrift) Hinds, 1998. Defining conservation priorities for plant taxa
42: 205-212. in southern New Brunswick, Canada using herbarium
Ali, H. and M. Qaiser. 2010a. Contribution to the Red List of records. Biol. Conserv., 86: 325-338.
Pakistan: a case study of Astragalus gahiratensis Ali Mauchamp, A., I. Aldaz, E. Ortiz and H. Valdebenito. 1998.
(Fabaceae-Papilionaceae). Pak. J. Bot., 42(3): 1523-1528. Threatened species, re-evaluation of the status of eight
Ali, H. and M. Qaiser. 2011. Contribution to the Red List of endemic plants of the Galapagos. Biodiversity and
Pakistan: a case study of Silene longisepala Conservation, 7: 97-107.
(Caryophyllaceae). Oryx. 45(4): 522-527. DOI: Nasir, Y.J. 1991. Threatened plants of Pakistan. In: Plant Life of
10.1017/S003060531000102x. South Asia. Proceeding of International Symposium. (Eds.):
Ali, S.I. 2000. Impact of environmental degradation on S.I. Ali & A. Ghaffar. University of Karachi, Karachi.
biodiversity. In: Proceedings Pakistan Academy of Science. Pitman, N.C.A. and P.M. Jørgensen. 2002. Estimating the size
37(1): pp. 93-97. of the world's threatened flora. Science, 298(1): 989.
Ali, S.I. 2008. Significance of Flora with special reference to Pujol, J.L.P., F. Zhang and G. Song. 2006. Plant biodiversity in
Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 40(3): 967-971. China: richly varied, endangered, and in need of
Ali, S.I. and M. Qaiser. 1986. A phytogeographical Analysis of conservation. Biodiversity and Conservation, 15: 3983-
Phanerogams of Pakistan and Kashmir. In: Proceedings of 4026.
Royle Society Edinburgh, 89B: 89-101. Randrianasolo, A., J.S. Miller and T.K. Consiglio. 2002.
Anonymous. 1998. District Census Report of Chitral. PCO, Application of IUCN criteria and Red list categories to
Govt. of Pakistan. species of five Anacardiaceae genera in Madagascar.
Anonymous. 2000. Government of Pakistan, World Wide Fund Biodiversity and Conservation, 11: 1289-1300.
for Nature, Pakistan and International Union for Raunkiaer, C. 1934. The Life from Plants and Statistical Plant
Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, Pakistan. Geography Clarendron Press, Oxford.
Anonymous. 2001. 2001 IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria Riedl, H. and Y.J. Nasir. 1991. Ranunculaceae, In: Flora of
(Version 3.1) IUCN Species Survival Commission, IUCN Pakistan. (Eds.): S.I. Ali and Y.J. Nasir. Islamabad &
Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge UK. Karachi.
[http://www.redlist.org/info/categories_criteria2001.html, Romeo, M.I., P. Ramil and M. Rubinos. 1994. Conservation
accessed 13 April 2009]. status of Eryngium viviparum Gay. Acta Bot. Gallica., 151:
Anonymous. 2009. 2009 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 55-64.
IUCN, Gland, Switzerland. http://www.iucnredlist.org Sala, O.E., F.S. Chapin, III 2000. Global Biodiversity Scenarios
[accessed 17 September 2009]. for the Year 2100. Science, 287: 1770-1774.
Ashton. 1981. Techniques for the identification and Schatz, G.E. 2002. Taxonomy and herbaria in service of plant
conservation of threatened species in tropical forests. In: conservation: lessons from Madagascar’s endemic families.
The Biological Aspects of Rare Plant Conservation. (Ed.): Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard., 89: 145-152.
H. Synge. John Willey & Sons Ltd. pp. 155-164. Schemske, D.W., B.C. Husband, M.H. Ruckelshaus, C.
Bernardos, S., A. Amado and F. Amich. 2006. The narrow Goodwillie, I.M. Parker and J.G. Bishop. 1994. Evaluating
endemic Scrophularia valdesii Ortega-Olivencia & Devesa approaches to the conservation of rare and endangered
(Scrophulariaceae) in the Iberian Peninsula: an evaluation plants. Ecology, 75: 584-606.
of its conservation status. Biodiversity and Conservation. Steege, H., M.J. Jansen-Jacobs and V.K. Datadin. 2000. Can
15: 4027-4043. botanical collections assist in a National Protected Area
Burgman, M.A., R.C. Grimson and S. Ferson. 1995. Inferring Strategy in Guyana? Biodiversity and Conservation, 9: 215-
threat from scientific collections. Conservation Biology. 9: 240.
923-928. Ungricht, S., J.-Y. and F. Kjellberg. 2005. Extinction threat
Callmander, M.W., G.E. Schatz and P.P. Lowry II. 2005. IUCN evaluation of endemic fig trees on new Caledonia: priority
Red List assessment and the Global Strategy for Plant assessment for taxonomy and conservation with herbarium
Conservation: taxonomists must act now. Taxon, 54 (4): collections. Biodivers. Conserv., 14: 205-232.
1047-1050. Walter, K.S. and H.J. Gillet, (Eds.) 1998. 1997 IUCN Red List
Funk, V.A., M.F. Zermaglio and N. Nasir. 1999. Testing the use of Threatened Plants. Compiled by the World Conservation
of specimen collection data and GIS in biodiversity Monitoring Centre. IUCN, The World Conservation Union,
exploration and conservation decision making in Guyana. Gland, Switzerland & Cambridge UK.
Biodiversity and Conservation, 8: 727-752. Western, D. 2001. Human-modified ecosystems and future
Glowka, L., F. Burhenne-Guilmin, H. Synge, J.A. McNeely and evolution. PNAS, 98(10): 5458-5465.
L. Gündling. 1994. A guide to the Convention on Willis, F., J. Moat and A. Paton. 2003. Defining a role for
Biological Diversity. Environmental Policy and Law Paper herbarium data in Red List assessments: a case study of
30. Gland, IUCN, p. 15-51. Plectranthus from eastern and southern tropical Africa.
Golding, J.S. and P.P. Smith. 2001. A 13-point flora strategy to Biodiversity Conservation, 12: 1537-1552.
meet conservation challenges. Taxon, 50: 475-478. Woodruff, D.S. 2001. Declines of Biomes and Biotas and the
Google, 2009. ©2009 Google Inc. 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway future of evolution. Colloquium, 98: 5471-5476.
Mountain view, CA 94042.
Hedenas, L., I. Bisang, A. Tehler, M. Hamnede, K. Jaederfelt
and G. Odelvik. 2002. A herbarium based method for

(Received for publication 20 February 2010)