Different people are successful in different fields.

Some people work long hours

to get success, but others feel that we should spend free time for fun rather than
money. Which style is closely related to you and explains your opinion?

As the old adage goes, “Men are distributed not by things, but by the view which
they take of them.” The contentious issue at present is the issue of the lifestyle of
individuals. People generally espouse the notion that a nonchalant perception is
ideal for a good life. I opine that hard work is the epitome of a successful life. This
essay will scrutinize both the aspects of the quandary in the ensuing paragraphs.

To begin with, proponents consider the cause of being careless towards

problems and rejoice moments as stress never proves beneficial. Furthermore,
they believe that life is counted by the moments that you experience rather than
the amount of money that lies in one's bank account. In addition, money is not
everything as it cannot buy trust, loyalty and happiness which are the
quintessential emotions. For example, the survey of 2019 exhibits that the
individuals who don't work hard for a cause experience 27% less stress
compared to the ones who are determined towards hard work.

Secondly, I vehemently believe that achievement cannot be made possible

without being assiduous or everyone would be having a carefree and opulent
lifestyle. Similarly, in order to achieve something, time and efforts play a cardinal
role to acquire something substantial that cannot be achieved with negligence.
Moreover, money is an essential commodity which can aid anyone to live an
enthralling lifestyle and have their desired goals come true. To exemplify, the
reports of 2020 depict that people who are leaders of various organizations work
64% more harder than those in governance.

In conclusion, taking these points into consideration, from a personal

perspective, without a shadow of a doubt, I am inclined to believe that hard work,
money and success are vital ingredients for an ideal lifestyle.

More and more companies are allowing their employees to work at home.
Do you think this is a positive or negative development?

As the old ages goes,’ men are distributed mat by things, but by the view which
they take of them.” The contentious issue at present is the issue of employees
working from home. People generally espouse the notion that work from home is
a negative practice for the organization. I opine that working from home has
myriad benefits for employees. This essay will scrutinize both the aspects of the
quandary in the ensuing paragraphs.

To begin with, proponents consider the cause of remotely working from home for
employees in decreasing the efficiency of the worker by expunging from a
competitive environment. Furthermore, the worker experiences laziness when at
home due to the lack of governance. In addition, due to a sedentary lifestyle
ensued at home, the physical activity is limited, augmenting obesity and similar
health issues. For example, a survey of 2019 exhibits the individuals who work
from home are 27% more vulnerable to weight gain than those working at
companies.

Secondly. I vehemently assert that working from home is ideal for people as it
saves the time and exhaustion from the diurnal commute. Similarly, it would
ameliorate the morale of the employee by working close to their loved ones in a
place of his own predilection. Moreover, he can manage time flexibility in which
more work can be covered by the employee as per their convenience. To
exemplify, the report of 2020 elucidates the employees working from home have
54% more efficiency in completing their work than those who work from office.

In conclusion, taking these points into consideration, from a personal

perspective, without a shadow of a doubt, I am inclined to believe that working
from home is beneficial.

Space travel is the exploration of the ambiguous territory, which needs to be discovered
to learn about life beyond earth. The phenomenon of space travel and its corresponding
impacts has triggered a turbulent scenario. People favour investment in the matters of
environmental problems caused by space exploration. I am inclined to conceive that
spending money on other vital aspects can be fruitful. This essay will scrutinize the
aspects of the polemic on public funding.

To begin with, the earth’s orbit is cluttered after accruing years of continuous rocket and
satellite launches, which orbits at a variant speed, can pose a major threat to the
International Space Station and active satellites. Furthermore, there have been various
programs for cleaning up the space environment led by governments by raising public
funding to solve the predicament. In addition, space paves various paths to discover
new lifeforms to analyse and utilise for medicinal purposes. For example, space
remains an uncharted territory, as India invested to explore mars last year by investing 2
billion rupees, but unfortunately remained successful in the mission.

From a scientific point of view, I am vehement towards supplementary investments on

environmental dilemmas led by space, as I believe it should be taken care at that very
same instant. Moreover, developing countries entail developments existing in the vicinity
rather than space miles away from them. Apart from that, public funding is an attribute
by the people for their own benefit, which should be done for the benefit of that
particular community by future developments and not squandering capital on what has
been mistakenly left. For example, Dubai rarely spends on space research and has
major investments in the tourism and infrastructure facilities making it the most prime
destination in the world.

In conclusion, from an overall perspective, I am inclined to profoundly believe that public

funding should be utilised for the benefit of society by ameliorating the lifestyles of
people.

The disadvantages of tourism in less developed countries are as great as the

advantages. What is your opinion?
The issue at present is the issue of whether the drawbacks of tourism in less advanced
countries are as fabulous as the benefits. People generally espouse the notion there are no
advantages in less developed countries. I opine that the disadvantages of tourism in less
developed countries are as great as the advantages. This essay will scrutinize both the aspects
of the quandary in the ensuing paragraphs.

To begin with, proponents consider the cause of less developed countries does not have any
advantages of tourism because of limitations. Furthermore, tourism needs more people and
developed facilities to govern, which is not there in less developed countries. In addition, less
developed countries have to focus on more important factors rather than tourism. For example,
the survey of 2019 showed miniscule development in tourism for the least developed countries.

Secondly, I believe that the disadvantages of tourism are tantamount to the advantages
because the less the population, the less the pollution. Similarly, if there are no people then the
threats of stealing and killing can be avoided. Moreover, with the scarcity of people there would
be less waste and a cleaner environment. To exemplify, last years reports show that less
developed countries are cleaner than developed countries with more tourism.

In conclusion, taking these points into consideration, from a personal perspective, without a
shadow of a doubt, I am inclined to believe that the limitations of tourism in less advanced
countries are as prominent as the benefits.

Psychologists have known for many years that colour can affect how people feel. For this
reason, attention should be given to colour schemes when decorating places such as
offices and hospitals. How true this statement? How far colours influence people's health
and capacity for work?
As the old adage goes, “Men are distributed not by things, but by the view which they
take of them.” The contentious issue at present is the issue of colours cannot affect
peoples feelings and influences their health and work. People generally espouse the
notion, colours do not affect people’s well-being. I opine that colours affect prosperity.
This essay will scrutinize both the aspects of the quandary in the ensuing paragraphs.

To begin with, proponents consider the cause of the well-being of people is unaffected
by the range of vibrant colours. Furthermore, people believe that the mind is moulded
through experience and actions and not mere colours. In addition, there are many
influences such as the television, friends and family who are responsible for the
wellness of the individual, for the colours are scarcely followed. For example, a survey
shows that 57% of the people were influenced in health and fitness by going to the gym.

Secondly, I believe that colours prove to affect a person by the decorative visuals and
peaceful images or surroundings. Similarly, colours in places of learning and work
motivate people by their radiance and subtle usage in their surroundings. Moreover,
colours are also helpful to release stress, blood pressure and increase metabolism. To
exemplify, reports of 2019 illustrate that the influence of colours has obtained 45%
more productivity rate in workplaces.

In conclusion, taking these points into consideration, from a personal perspective,

without a shadow of a doubt, I am inclined to believe that colours are very much
important to influence the well-being of individuals.

Q. Despite a large number of gyms, a sedentary(desk-bound) lifestyle is gaining

popularity in the contemporary world. What problems are associated with this?
What solutions can you suggest?
These days there has been a substantial rise in the number of fitness centres that
have opened up. People espouse the notion that a stationary lifestyle is more
comfortable and favourable. I opine that a stagnant lifestyle is deleterious to the
human body. This essay will scrutinize the aspects in the ensuing paragraphs.

To begin with, with the advancements in technology, work can be done remotely and
one does not require to put in physical labour to earn. Furthermore, due to the lethargic
mindset of people, the human body becomes vulnerable to diseases. In addition,
people get tired from work and get captivated towards several subscriptions of online
entertainment which entice them to become a couch potato and watch their favourite
shows in their spare time instead of going to the gym. For example, a survey of 2019
exhibited there was an increase in gym outlets with a decrease in the number of
subscriptions.

Secondly, I believe that keeping oneself occupied with physical exercises refrains
diseases and accentuates fitness. Similarly, self-motivation is the prime factor that one
has to consider in order to start a disciplined routine which creates a balance between
work and fitness. Moreover, depression and irritation are experienced by people who
don’t move a muscle, for they need to improve their mental health by getting some
fresh air either by a walk or jog to keep them cheerful and healthy. To exemplify, the
report on health in 2020 shows that there has been a 17% rise in productivity by people
who tend to do physical exercises.

In conclusion, from my perspective, I am inclined to profoundly believe, without a

shadow of a doubt, it is suitable for individuals to workout rather than remain
rooted to the spot.

Some people think the role of parents is to discipline their children and teach
them about right and wrong. Other people consider that the main responsibility of
parents is to nurture their children and provide them with a safe environment to
grow up in. Discuss both sides and give your opinion?
As the old adage goes, “Men are distributed not by things, but by the view which they
take of them.” The contentious issue at present is the issue of whether parents should
discipline their children or provide them with a safe haven for maturity. People generally
espouse the notion that discipline should be inculcated into children by their family. I opine that
it is the care and nourishment that parents should provide for growth. This essay will
scrutinize both the aspects of the quandary in the ensuing paragraphs.

To begin with, proponents consider the cause of teaching discipline to youngsters by their
parents. Furthermore, they believe that teaching discipline can benefit the child by learning
ideal manners and demeanour to act in front of formal and informal individuals. In addition,
when they are aware of what is right and wrong, they can be mature enough to make their own
independent decisions and shape a good future. For example, the survey of 2019 in India
depicts children who are well disciplined have 37% more probability to succeed in their future.

Secondly, I am vehement towards the aspect of care and learning to accentuate growth and
nourishment in the early years of life for children. Similarly, young people are immature to
experience the hardships of life, so in their early years, they should feel comfortable and
careless to be cheerful and lively in order to increase their creativity and inculcate the
experiences of parents. Moreover, when they are cared and well taken care of, they get more
zealous as they can have support from their loved ones to have significant endeavours. To
exemplify, the reports of 2020 exhibit that children who are loved and nourished by their parents
are having a 66% probability for substantial growth in their lives.

In conclusion, taking these points into consideration, from a personal perspective,

without a shadow of a doubt, I am inclined to believe that children should be cared and
nurtured by providing a safe environment to grow up.

Many people believe that we should protect all wild animals while
others believe we should just protect some of them.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.

As the old adage goes, “Men are distributed not by things, but by the view
which they take of them.” The contentious issue at present is the issue of
animal protection. People generally espouse the notion that only some of
them should be protected. I opine that every animal is imperative as they
are a vital part of the environmental balance. This essay will scrutinize both
the aspects of the quandary in the ensuing paragraphs.

To begin with, proponents are of the outset that due to limited resources,
only some of the species in animals should be protected. Furthermore,
people believe that animal execution for their fur and teeth is luxurious for
their leisure, so everyone should not be saved. In addition, most of the
animals are consumed as delicacies in various demographics, so they are
already utilized as food. For example, the survey of 2019 exhibited that the
extinction of animals due to their hunting practices and consumption in food
gave rise to 17% of industrialisation near the forests.

Secondly, I am vehement that animals, may it be any species should be

saved as they are a fundamental part of the ecosystem and have equal
rights to survive. Similarly, each species is interdependent on one another,
so if one suffers then it will affect another to trigger a downfall. Moreover,
they are beneficial in medicinal care and are helping hands in agricultural
practices. To exemplify, the reports of 2020 delineated that animals are
helping keep the food chain intact by 48%, so their absence would prove
deleterious.

In conclusion, taking these points into consideration, from a personal

perspective, without a shadow of a doubt, I am inclined to believe that
every animal has the right to live and prosper.
Culture shock is a new worry leading to less immigration. What are the
possible options to eradicate this issue?

Cultural shock happens when a person goes to a new country and

experiences a different culture. It seems like a small problem at the onset,
but it can lead to broader psychological issues. Therefore, steps must be
taken to eradicate it. I opine that various steps should be taken by the
government and authorities of that place to expunge the culture shock. This
essay will scrutinize the aspects of the quandary in the ensuing
paragraphs.

To begin with, I consider the causes of culture shock makes an individual in

distress because that person has not lived in such a habitat. Furthermore,
the lifestyle and language barriers are worrying concerns as people are
unable to cope up in their daily life when abraod in different countries. For
example, a survey of 2019 exhibits that 45% people who migrated to
scotland came back their home countries due to difference in cultures and
lifestyle.

Secondly, I vehemently believe that the government can provide free

language learning and seminars on learning the culture and hertiage of that
particular place so that people do not feel isolated from the place they live
in. Similarly, it is essential to respect the new culture and diversity. Once a
person accepts that there is a difference and acknowledges it, then the
process of integration becomes easy. To exemplify, a report of 2020
elucidates that 73% of migrants have successfully integrated in England
due to a hospitable environment provided by the government.
In conclusion, taking these points into consideration, without a shadow of a
doubt, I am inclined to believe that various measures can be taken up to
solve the issue of culture shock.
Some scientists think that there are intelligent life forms on other planets
and messages should be sent to contact them. Other scientists think that it
is a bad idea and would be dangerous. Discuss both views and give your
opinion.

The contentious issue at present is the issue of whether extraterrestrial life is

maleficent to mankind or not. People generally espouse the notion that we
should try and communicate with life in space to know more about them and get
additional knowledge. I opine that it might be dangerous to try and communicate
with alien life as we are unaware of them. This essay will scrutinize both the
aspects of the quandary in the ensuing paragraphs.

To begin with, proponents consider the cause of communicating with alien life
because life on earth is diminishing, for there is extinction in every species
observed since the last decade as the natural resources are plummeting.
Furthermore, due to the advancements in technology, they believe to achieve a
nexus with the outer worlds to gain knowledge. In addition, information about
the different planets and their ecosystems can be communicated if such a
connection is established. For example, research exhibited that some
minerals brought back from mars were able to cure various diseases.

Secondly, I am vehement that aliens can either be friendly or hostile, but

currently, we are unaware of their characteristics. Similarly, if they do not exist
then we would be spending a lot of money, which will go in vain and can be either
utilised in other environmental concerns. Moreover, if unknown individuals exist
and are more powerful than us, then we do not have that much power to survive
their attack. To exemplify, a study shows that the probability of aliens
attacking earth is 56% and being amiable is only 26%.

In conclusion, taking these points into consideration, from a personal

perspective, without a shadow of a doubt, I am inclined to believe that it is
better to spend time on the things we know instead of exploring uncharted
territory.
Global warming is one of the biggest threats to our environment. What
causes global warming? What solutions are there to this problem?

As the old adage goes, “Men are distributed not by things, but by the view which they
take of them.” The contentious issue at present is the issue of global warming being the
paramount threat by depleting the ozone layer, increasing sea levels and temperature all
around the globe. I espouse the notion that gas emissions are heating up the atmosphere
leading to the melting of ice. Also, I opine that deforestation is the main culprit. This essay will
scrutinize both the aspects of the quandary in the ensuing paragraphs.

To begin with, I consider the cause of burning fossil fuels, vehicle and industrial emissions are
leading to a decline in the environment. Furthermore, more people can consider the option of
using public transportation in order to reduce vehicle emissions. In addition, instead of using
diesel and petrol generation in industries, which contaminate the environment, governments can
consider using clean energy by switching to magnetic, solar and electric energy sources. For
example, the reports of 2019 exhibit that switching to green energy reduced the emissions by
17%.

Secondly, I am vehemently towards the outset of stopping deforestation as it is increasing the

carbon dioxide in the atmosphere leading to hot gases. Similarly, plantation of more trees and
green belts can help ameliorate the problem by balancing the environment gases. Moreover,
special environmental protection camps can be organized in order to increase awareness of
people to save the trees and plant more of them by participating in the movement. To exemplify,
the survey of 2020 delineates that planting 1876 trees was able to dissipate the environmental
burden in global warming by 32%.

In conclusion, taking these points into consideration, from a personal perspective,

without a shadow of a doubt, I am inclined to believe that taking these steps into
consideration can help solve the predicament of global warming.
With increased population and even growing urban centres, many
countries are losing their natural beauty spots.

What benefits are there to protect places of natural beauty?

How can this be solved?

As the old adage goes, “Men are distributed not by things, but by the view which they
take of them.” The contentious issue at present is the issue of deteriorating public spots by
increasing population. I espouse the notion that preservation of natural beauty is essential for
tourism and also for land value. Also, I opine that future generations should also witness the
beauty of the local natural habitats. This essay will scrutinize both the aspects of the quandary
in the ensuing paragraphs.

To begin with, I consider the causes of gathering crowds which contaminate any tourist
destination by littering and spoiling the ideal places of natural beauty. Furthermore, the tourists,
as well as people, visiting the places should be restricted to use any items of their own and
should be levied a heavy penalty for contamination. In addition, people who think about
vandalising the place or throwing away unwanted garbage should be banned from visiting the
places for their entire life. For example, reports of 2019 exhibit by charging a heavy fine from
tourists plummeted the contaminations by 45%.

Secondly, the preservation of places is imperative in order to make it presentable for future
generations by saving the natural habitat. Similarly, proper knowledge offered to the visitors can
help to lessen the problems of defiling the places of interest. Moreover, reducing consumption,
reusing and recycling by volunteering for regular clean-ups of the place can help preserve the
place for a longer period of time. To exemplify, the survey of 2020 delineates that regular
cleansing of the spots of natural beauty improved the spots by 25%.

In conclusion, taking these points into consideration, from a personal perspective,

without a shadow of a doubt, I am inclined to believe that taking these steps into
consideration can help solve the predicament of saving the natural environment of beauty.
Some people think that it is better for a country’s economy for people to
spend money, while others believe that it would be better for people to save
money.

As the old adage goes, “Men are distributed not by things, but by the view which they take of
them.” The contentious issue at present is the issue of spending capital. People generally
espouse the notion that saving currency is a viable option. I opine that investing money on
various things can help substantiate the economy. This essay will scrutinize both the aspects of
the quandary in the ensuing paragraphs.

To begin with, proponents consider the cause of saving capital, for in case of future
emergencies it would be easy to manage. Furthermore, the savings can be accumulated to
reach the desired investment goal for various purposes. In addition, saving money also leads to
better development by gaining an ideal interest rate through an elongated period of time. For
example, a report of 2019 exhibits that people who save are able to manage their life and
careers more successfully than those who spend it in a prodigal manner.

Secondly, I am vehement towards expenditure of money, for if one does not invest, one cannot
reap the benefits. Similarly, the development of any economy can only reach its zenith through
investing in various aspects through time to experience profit margins. Moreover, investments in
various industries can lead to many jobs, which will help to achieve a significant turnover by
making progress in manufacturing or production. To exemplify, the survey of 2020 accentuates
that investments made in the first half of the year have gained almost 54% of profit already.

In conclusion, taking these points into consideration, from a personal perspective, without a
shadow of a doubt, I am inclined to believe that without investment no profit can be achieved
and development comes to a halt.
Compare the advantages and disadvantages of three of the following ways of learning a
foreign language.

State which you consider to be the most effective.

studying on your own

taking lessons with a private tutor
taking lessons as part of a class
taking lessons online
going to live in a country where the language is spoken

As the old adage goes, “Men are distributed not by things, but by the view which they take of
them.” The contentious issue at present is the issue of learning a non-native dialect. Some
people espouse the notion that there are various disadvantages of learning overseas speech. I
opine that there are various advantages to learning foreign language. This essay will scrutinize
both the aspects of the quandary in the ensuing paragraphs.

To begin with, proponents consider that learning a second language is not beneficial as it might
sometimes make us forget our own mother-tongue due to lack of knowledge when we study it
on our own. Furthermore, learning a new language is mostly exorbitant, while it is not always
possible to learn it completely when with a private tutor. In addition, another language is not
utilised everywhere and online sessions have certain limitations of complete understanding, so it
is better to stick to our prime language and invest the time of learning a language into
something productive. For example, the reports of 2019 exhibit that people who learnt a
secondary language were more unemployed than those with just one known language.

On the contrary, I vehemently believe that learning a foreign language is helpful as it can
make one understand about some values and cultures of other people when we explore things
by studying them on our own. Similarly, communication barriers can be removed while learning
it with a proficient private tutor and it can also help in many business organizations through
bilingual communications. Moreover, by learning new languages, one can also teach and
capitalise on the same through online sessions. To exemplify, a survey of 2020 shows that
people learning new languages have more opportunities in multinational companies.

In conclusion, taking these points into consideration, from a personal perspective, without a
shadow of a doubt, I am inclined to believe that the advantages of learning a foreign language
triumphs the disadvantages.
Longer life spans and improvements in the health of older people suggest
that people over the age of sixty-five can continue to live full and active
lives.

In what ways can society benefit from the contribution that older people
can make?

The era of technological advancements has made significant discoveries in medical

science, for people can now live up to an elongated lifespan and remain healthy and
active. I opine that the elderly these days who are 65 years of age and above can
provide noteworthy contribution to society by various activities. This essay will scrutinize
the roles of individuals above 65 years of age can play in benefiting society in the
ensuing paragraphs.

To begin with, I consider the cause of living a longer lifespan is primarily because of
medical innovation, which will aid individuals to participate for the well being of society.
Furthermore, these people possess vast knowledge and experience that will aid to all
the learning individuals through proper guidance. In addition, voluntary services can
also be an integral part which can be played by the old people to help the society
become an harmonious and ideal place to live. For example, the reports of 2019 exhibit
that the voluntary services made by the elderly was able to improve poverty of the
community by 12%.

Secondly, I vehemently believe that they can play a cardinal part in ameliorating the
environmental concerns by carrying out programmes of cleaning the environment,
plantations and motivate the populace for the green environment. Similarly, they can
also be consultants with various organizations and share their knowledge by leading
various projects for best outcomes. Moreover, they can also involve in the animal and
plant well-being by saving the species in decline and avoiding extinction, so this can
help the substantial growth of the overall animal and plant life cycle. To exemplify, the
survey of 2020 exhibits that there were 16 unusual activities taken up by the senior
citizens, which contributed to almost 14% of improvement in the environment leading to
a society in harmony.

In conclusion, taking these points into consideration, from a personal perspective,

without a shadow of a doubt, I am inclined to believe that if the senior citizens can
definitely assist in many ways to enhance the well-being of the society.
Nowadays, people spend too much time at work to the
extent that they hardly have time for their personal life.
Discuss.

As the old adage goes, “Men are distributed not by things, but by the view which
they take of them.” The contentious issue at present is the issue of equilibrium in
professional and personal life. People generally espouse the notion that
devotion to the company is neverending. I opine that life should have a
balance of private as well as work life. This essay will scrutinize both the aspects
of the quandary in the ensuing paragraphs.

To begin with, proponents consider the cause of the competitive environment it is

hardly surprising for employees to participate and indulge themselves in order to
be efficient. Furthermore, due to the recent transcendence of companies going
global, people have to work different time-zones in order to manage their targets.
In addition, to secure an ideal future one works round the clock to assume
relief afterwards. For example, the reports of 2019 exhibited that the employees
of various organizations were able to aid the turnover through elongated hours by
27%, but then most of the workforce endured illnesses.

Secondly, I vehemently believe that material possession is not always considered

as luxury, but the roots, memories and ties with family are priceless. Similarly, no
matter the time contributed to the workplace ensues, but the congruence with
loved ones is the only thing that can rejuvenate senses and provide tranquillity.
Moreover, if any worker is unable to provide time with their kids and wife, this can
also result in jeopardising the relationship and losing them forever which is not a
wise thing to do. To exemplify, one of my colleagues manages his work and
home life in such a seamless manner that he does overtime and then takes the
day off to spend time with family.

In conclusion, taking these points into consideration, from a personal

perspective, without a shadow of a doubt, I am inclined to believe that not only
work, but the family is also essentially important.
Most people think that truth should be objective rather than subjective when it comes to news. Do
you think all news is true? What is the function of newspapers?

The controversial concern at present is the matter of how society assumes the facts of
news to be objective or subjective. People generally espouse the notion that news
should be objective in the majority. I opine that news which is presented to the people
should be subjective and ideal. This essay will scrutinize both the aspects of the
quandary in the ensuing paragraphs.

To begin with, proponents consider the cause of newspapers and various sources to
adulterate the news in order to gain popularity. Furthermore, they believe journalists
need to twist the news just to sound more interesting to the viewers, which results in
delivering misleading information to mass audiences and gaining popularity for the
reporter. For example, researchers from the University of Oxford stated that about 30%
of news channels are not authorized and tend to deliver fake news.

Secondly, I vehemently believe that newspapers are meant to provide information about
things happening in and around the country by having a good shelf - life for people to
have faith and awareness. Also, it has a cluster of news covering all the topics every
day related to a country such as crime, politics, diet, stocks and so on which is the only
source of media one can find time for in day-to-day life. Similarly, since it is a paper in
the form of a booklet, which can be preserved over months and can be reviewed when
necessary, it has to be justified. For instance, the Daily newspaper had an article
regarding a crime, later, after a month's victim got identified with that piece of news and
got arrested.

In conclusion, taking these points into consideration, from a personal perspective,

without a shadow of a doubt, I am inclined to believe that news should be factual and
not lead people to believe otherwise.
Some people say that now we can see films on our phones or tablets, and there
is no need to go to the cinema. Others say that to be fully enjoyed, films need to
be seen in a cinema.
Discuss both these views and give your opinion

There has been a polemical about the idea of where one should watch a movie. People
espouse the notion that movies should be viewed only in theaters instead of watching
them on the phones. I opine that watching the movies on phones is quite convenient.
This essay will scrutinize both the aspects in the ensuing paragraphs.

To begin with, proponents are of the outset that watching a movie on a big screen
transcends the experience through diverse visual and sound effects. Furthermore, the
cinema hall can accommodate various groups and individuals that can accentuate the
hours spent while watching with a different experience. In addition, watching a movie in
the cineplexes can occur without any disturbances and in a harmonious manner. For
example, I watched the Avengers with my friends in a theater which made me feel like I
was amidst the characters and felt lively.

Secondly, I vehemently support watching movies on the phone as it saves a lot of

money and time to commute to the multiplex. Similarly, watching a movie on the phone
can be carried out at our convenience as well as frequency of watching it. Moreover, at
the cost of one ticket I can purchase a subscription of a movie portal for the entire year.
To exemplify, watching a movie is possible on Netflix at a subscription of just 199
Rupees per year.

In conclusion, from an overall perspective, I am inclined to believe, without a shadow of

a doubt, that the perks of watching a movie on the phone triumphs that of watching in
the cinema.
Do you believe that experimentation on animals for scientific purposes is
justified? Are there any alternatives to animal experimentation?

Many animals are experimented upon for the sake of finding cures for mankind. From
the scientific point of view, animal experimentation is considered the best way to trial
new products, drugs and make sure that medicines are safe and effective before
commencing clinical trials. I opine the treatment received by the animals is excruciating,
which can be altered. The essay will scrutinize how the experimentation can ease the
procedures in the ensuing paragraphs.

To begin with, I am vehement that animals have aided in myriad ways in order to be
tested for scientific purposes, which does not justify the treatment they endure.
Furthermore, by the outcome of various medicine, they have ameliorated the lives of
individuals. In addition, these creatures are living beings too, so they also feel pain and
emotion which should be understood by the people in the laboratories who test them.
For Example, a survey elucidates that the lifespan of test subjects is almost 43% due to
the way they are treated.

Secondly, the advancements in technology these days can help learn more about the
composition and body modelling of the animal, so it can exhibit if there is a positive
outcome before testing the animal. Similarly, instead of animals, plant testing can be an
alternative at times as it has proven to be successful in almost 34% of the cases.
Moreover, healthy and diseased tissue donated from human volunteers can provide a
more relevant way of studying human biology and disease than animal testing. To
exemplify, a report of 2020 depicted that an alternative to animal testing leads to an
increase in the animal population and avoids extinction by 17%.

In conclusion, from an overall perspective, without a shadow of a doubt, I am inclined to

believe that animal testing is not justified and there are various ways to replace them.
Nowadays many countries have very cosmopolitan cities with people from all
over the world. How can the government ensure that all these people can live
together harmoniously.

Globalization has led to the amalgamation of various cultures into the advent of different
societies coming together but managing these cities is made exemplary by the
governing bodies. I opine that it is the government that can play a prominent role in
establishing tranquility and prosperity in various places. This essay will scrutinize the
aspects of the authoritative bodies in the ensuing paragraphs.

To begin with, I vehemently believe that to run any town, city or a country it is the
government that can control and lead the people because it is the only body that not
only finances but also creates laws for people to monitor and control. Furthermore, to
integrate different denizens and cultures there can be events organized by the
authorities to help everyone fathom distinct cultures and respect them. In addition,
multilingual schools for different types of children can be established to have a gamut of
students from various corners of the world and educate them under the same roof. For
example, a survey of 2019 elucidates that students of global schools achieve 47% more
results compared to regular schools because of a healthy competition amongst its
students.

Secondly, the authorities can also bifurcate the jobs of individuals by fixing a limited
quota of different communities so that everyone can have the benefit of job
opportunities. Similarly, the festivals of all communities can be encouraged and given
importance by the authorities so that everyone can come together, rejoice and celebrate
with zest. Moreover, the legislation can be made stringent for everyone which would
help diminish negative activities and substantiate a positive and prosperous
environment to live in. To exemplify, the reports of 2020 exhibit that 100% of the people
of Slovakia adhered to the laws of the community which made it the most peaceful
place on the planet.

In conclusion, from an overall perspective, without a shadow of a doubt, I am inclined to

believe that the government plays a cardinal role to monitor any city and maintain
peace.
Popular events like the football world cup and other international sporting
occasions are essential in easing international tensions and releasing patriotic
emotions in a safe way. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this
opinion?

As the old adage goes, “Men are distributed not by things, but by the view which they
take of them.” The contentious issue at present is the issue of the role of international
sporting events play. People generally espouse the notion worldwide competitions
augment the hostility among the spectators. I opine that such occasions can ameliorate
bondings among individuals. This essay will scrutinize both the aspects of the quandary
in the ensuing paragraphs.

To begin with, proponents consider the cause of antagonism among the viewers due to
the teams competing against one another which might lead to a disastrous scenario.
Furthermore, the impact of the demeanour of the audience from representing nations
can directly cause tension among the countries and things can escalate if matters get
worse. In addition, players can also play a cardinal role during the game as they not
only can create panic through their temperaments, but also injure the prominent player
of the opposite team. For example, the survey of 2019 exhibits that international sport
tournaments have led to wars between countries by 13% since the last decade.

Secondly, I vehemently believe that war should be expunged and people should come
together and enhance the notion of globalization so that world peace can be attained.
Similarly, healthy competitions should be pragmatically promoted for better awareness
in the athletic world to elucidate which team triumphs over the world. Moreover, people
should also greet their fellow athletes in harmony and exhibit to be ideal role models for
the crowd by playing a fair game. To exemplify, the reports of 2020 depicted that healthy
competitions have improved nations to trade with each other in prosperity by 67%.

In conclusion, taking these points into consideration, from a personal perspective,

without a shadow of a doubt, I am inclined to believe that a safe approach to
international sporting can substantiate international relations.
There are many female students who finish degrees in science and technology
courses at university, but few move into the workplace after they graduate. Why is
this? What measures can be taken to encourage them into work?

Nowadays with the advancements in technology and the forward approach of denizens,
gender equality and female empowerment has led to various female students
burgeoning their knowledge to attain university degrees. I generally espouse the notion
that there still remain a plethora of impediments to restrict women at workplaces. This
essay will scrutinize the aspects of the quandary in the ensuing paragraphs.

To begin with, I will now consider what still keeps them away from the office
environment and bounds them to household chores because their freedom is restricted.
Furthermore, due to the parochial setup of the corporate jobs and the biased
organizational setups, the female employees do not receive enough support from the
companies which isolates them from the regular groups. In addition, by the time the girls
complete their graduation they are chastised and end up getting married which deviates
them to join any workplace due to restrictions and household responsibilities. For
example, a survey of 2020 exhibits that 68% of female graduates marry after their
graduation leading to household constraints rather than the freedom of working.

Secondly, in order to ameliorate the present scenario for women to work, the
government and private institutions should give special opportunities and particular
quota for female recruitment. Similarly, by giving them myriad privileges during the time
of maternity such as paid maternity leaves, employers should ensure that they can
manage their personal and professional life. Moreover, families should be made
supportive by giving proper knowledge and awareness about women empowerment and
equality to assist womankind to come at par with men in the organizations. To exemplify,
reports of Meghalaya delineate 48% of the economy and efficiency was uplifted when
the women took up the job roles at higher positions.

In conclusion, taking these points into consideration, from a personal perspective,

without a shadow of a doubt, I am inclined to believe that restrictions to women in the
job environment should be eradicated.
In your opinion, what are the advantages and disadvantages of
extreme or adventure sports?

Adventure sports have gained tremendous prominence since the last decade and are taken up
by a myriad of individuals. I believe with paramount popularity of this sport plethora have
benefited, but I am less inclined towards it. This essay will scrutinize the merits and demerits of
extreme sports in the ensuing paragraphs.

To begin with, I have understood that people have an affinity towards this sport, for it brings
adrenaline and an escape from the mundane. Furthermore, bungee jumping, skydiving and
skiing over the cliffs have made people get rid of their most cardinal fears so that they can
overcome through the struggle and manage life in tranquility. In addition, white water river rafting
is challenging as it augments the confidence of any individual. For example, the survey of 2019
exhibits that people taking adventure sports have ameliorated their efficiency by 23%.

Secondly, I vehemently assert that the disadvantages of this activity are notable considering the
damages it can bring to someone’s life. Similarly, there are high possibilities of injuries because
the environment and conditions of the activity is uncertain and sometimes people do not realise
the fragility of one’s health by getting involved. Moreover, most of the individuals take this
dangerous task in order to get famous among friends, assert their dominance in groups and be
a daredevil which results into life threatening and traumatic events. To exemplify, the reports of
2020 elucidate that 63% of the people have suffered from severe injuries when indulging
themselves in extreme sports.

In conclusion, taking these points into consideration, from a personal perspective, without a
shadow of a doubt, I am inclined to believe that the disadvantages of adventure sports triumph
the advantages.