Aislamiento de Agrobacterium3
Aislamiento de Agrobacterium3
Aislamiento de Agrobacterium3
DOI 10.1007/s11274-013-1488-9
ORIGINAL PAPER
Received: 20 May 2012 / Accepted: 30 January 2013 / Published online: 26 September 2013
Ó Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013
Abstract Root nodule accommodates various non-nodu- most efficient plant growth promoting agents, MSP9 and
lating bacteria at varying densities. Present study was planned MSP10, were phylogenetically identified by 16S rRNA gene
to identify and characterize the non-nodulating bacteria from sequence analysis as Ochrobactrum and Enterobacter,
the pea plant. Ten fast growing bacteria were isolated from the respectively, with 99 % similarity. It is suggested the potential
root nodules of cultivated pea plants. These bacterial isolates endophytic bacterial strains, Ochrobactrum sp. MSP9 and
were unable to nodulate pea plants in nodulation assay, which Enterobacter sp. MSP10, can be used as biofertilizers for
indicate the non-rhizobial nature of these bacteria. Bacterial various legume and non-legume crops after studying their
isolates were tested in vitro for plant growth promoting prop- interaction with the host crop and field evaluation.
erties including indole acetic acid (IAA) production, nitrogen
fixation, phosphate solubilization, root colonization and bio- Keywords Pisum sativum L. Plant growth
film formation. Six isolates were able to produce IAA at promoting bacteria 16S rRNA sequencing Nodules
varying level from 0.86 to 16.16 lg ml-1, with the isolate
MSP9 being most efficient. Only two isolates, MSP2 and
MSP10, were able to fix nitrogen. All isolates were able to Introduction
solubilize inorganic phosphorus ranging from 5.57 to
11.73 lg ml-1, except MSP4. Bacterial isolates showed con- Rhizobia are soil bacteria, recognized by the character of
siderably better potential for colonization on pea roots. Isolates infecting roots of legume (Fabaceae) plants and develop-
MSP9 and MSP10 were most efficient in biofilm formation on ing an outgrowth on root, called nodule, which are the
polyvinyl chloride, which indicated their potential to withstand small factories of atmospheric nitrogen fixation. In the past,
various biotic and abiotic stresses, whereas the remaining rhizobia were considered to include the bacteria belonging
isolates showed a very poor biofilm formation ability. The to genera Rhizobium, Azorhizobium, Bradyrhizobium,
Ensifer and Mesorhizobium. Recently, it is found that rhi-
zobia is a paraphyletic group, fall into three classes of
proteobacteria-alpha, beta and gamma-proteobacteria
M. Tariq S. Hameed T. Yasmeen M. Zahid M. Zafar
(Angus and Hirsch 2010; Benhizia et al. 2004).
Microbial Physiology Laboratory, National Institute for
Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering (NIBGE)/ PAEC, Root nodules also accommodate various non-nodulating
Islamabad, Pakistan bacteria having definite influence on the survival, nodulation
and grain yield of crop and their densities are reported to be
M. Tariq (&) T. Yasmeen
very high (Mishra et al. 2009; Tariq et al. 2012). These
Government College University Faisalabad (GCUF),
Allama Iqbal Road, Faisalabad, Pakistan endophytic bacteria live inside the nodule tissues without
e-mail: mruaf@hotmail.com; mohsintariq@gcuf.edu.pk substantially harming or gaining benefit other than shelter
(Kobayashi and Palumbo 2000). Such bacteria are relatively
M. Zafar
protected from the competitive, high-stress environment of
Centre of Agricultural Biochemistry and Biotechnology
(CABB), University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Faisalabad, soil and promote plant growth by producing plant growth
Pakistan promoting substances (Aravind et al. 2012; Patel et al. 2012).
123
720 World J Microbiol Biotechnol (2014) 30:719–725
123
World J Microbiol Biotechnol (2014) 30:719–725 721
solubilization was quantified by Phospho-molybdate blue and Doly 1979). The primers used for amplification of full
color method (Nair et al. 2007) using spectrophotometer length 16S rRNA gene were universal primer P1 (forward
(Campec M350 Double Beam). primer, 50 -CGGGATCCAGAGTTTGATCCTGGTCAGA
ACGAACGCT-30 ) and P6 (reverse primer, 50 -CGGGATCCT
Root colonization assay ACGGCTACCTTGTTACGACTTCACCCC-30 ), which
correspond to E. coli positions 8–37 and 1,479–1,506,
Potential of bacterial isolates to colonize pea roots was also respectively and amplifies 1,500 bp fragment (Tan et al.
studied. Ten-day-old plants were harvested and the roots were 1997). Each 25 ll of PCR reaction mixture contained 2.5 ll
cut into 1.5 cm segments. Pieces of uniform shape and size 109 PCR buffer, 2 ll MgCl2, 1 ll dNTPs (2.5 mM), 1 U of
were placed into the 96-wells of a microtiter plate. 200 ll of Taq Polymerase (Promega), 1 ll of each primer (100
bacterial culture maintained at OD600 = 0.2 were added to the ng ll-1) and 1 ll template DNA (12.5 ng ll-1). Reaction
wells and the plates were incubated at 28 °C for 24 h for fast mixture (25 ll) prepared for 16S rRNA gene amplification,
growing and 72 h for slow growing bacteria. After the incu- was initially denatured at 94 °C for 2 min followed by 25
bation period, the root pieces were removed from the cultures, cycles consisting of denaturation at 94 °C for 1 min, primer
washed with sterile water, and then added to 1 ml sterile annealing at 52 °C for 1 min and primer extension at 72 °C
water. Bacterial biofilms were removed from the root surface for 3 min and finally extension at 72 °C for 20 min in a
and dispersed in sterile water by vigorous shaking. An aliquot thermal cycler. The amplified 16S rRNA gene was ligated in
(100 ll) of the dispersed preparation was plated on YEM agar TA cloning vector pTZ57R/T (Fermentas), which has
and counted after 5 days as c.f.u. 0.1 mg-1 root. 2,886 bp length. 30 ll ligation reaction was prepared in sterile
water with 1.5 ll T4 DNA ligase, 3 ll ligation Buffer, 3 ll
Biofilm formation assay pTZ57R/T vector (Fermentas), 3 ll of PEG 4000 and 4 ll
amplified DNA in 1.2 ml tube. Ligation was performed
Biofilm formation was studied on a abiotic surface by a overnight in water bath at 16 °C. Plasmids were transformed
microtiter plate assay according to Fujishige et al. (2006) chemically in E. coli TOP10 and extraction of recombinant
with some modifications. The bacterial cultures were grown plasmids was carried out using GeneJET Plasmid Miniprep
upto an optical density at k600 nm (OD600) = 2.0 in YEM Kit (Fermentas) and clones were confirmed by restriction
broth, pelleted by centrifugation at 8,000 rev. min-1 for analysis using EcoRI and BamHI (Fermentas). During
2 min, and washed with sterile distilled water. The cells molecular studies, amplified products and clones were
were resuspended in the same medium and maintained at resolved on 1 % agarose gel and GeneRulerTM 1 kb ladder
OD600 = 0.2. An aliquot (150 ll) of bacterial cell suspen- #SM0313 was used as DNA size marker. Clones were
sion was added to individual wells in a 96-well polyvinyl sequenced on ABI Prism 3100 Genetic Analyzer (Hitachi,
chloride (PVC) plate (Fisher, USA). YEM alone was used Japan) using Big Dye Terminator v 1.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit.
as the control. The plates were covered with plastic lids and The gene sequences were compared with others in sequence
incubated at 28 °C for 24 h for fast growing and 72 h for databases using NCBI BLAST software (Altschul et al. 1990)
slow growing bacteria. After the incubation period, the at http://www.ncbi.n1m.nih.gov/blast/Blast.cgi.
medium was removed and the wells were washed with
sterile water. The plates were allowed to dry and the wells
were treated with 150 ll of 0.001 % crystal violet for Results
15 min. The excess of dye was removed and the wells were
washed with sterile water. The retained stain was solubi- Isolation of endophytic bacteria from root nodules
lized with 150 ll of 95 % ethanol and amount of dye was
quantified by plate reader at absorbance of 570 nm. A total of ten bacterial isolations were obtained on the basis
of colony morphology from the nodules sweet pea grown in
Statistical analysis the fields of NIBGE, Faisalabad, Pakistan. Colony and cell
morphological characters were highly variable as presented
The data were analyzed statistically using MSTAT soft- in Table 1. Bacterial isolates were also tested for Gram
ware. Analysis of variance was computed and means were reaction. Out of ten isolates, two were gram positive while
compared employing the LSD test (Steel and Torrie 1980). rests of the bacterial isolates were gram negative (Table 1).
Total genomic DNA of potential bacterial strains MSP9 and All the nodule endophytic bacteria were initially tested for
MSP10 was isolated by the alkaline lysis method (Birnboim plant infectivity assay for nodulation. They were able to
123
722 World J Microbiol Biotechnol (2014) 30:719–725
Table 1 Morphological characteristics of nodule endophytic bacteria Five bacterial isolates were able to produce IAA at
isolated from sweet pea nodule varying level, ranged from 0.86 to 16.16 lg ml-1. Isolate
Isolates Colony morphology Cell Gram MSP9 was most efficient in IAA production by producing
morphology reaction 16.16 lg ml-1 (Table 2). Bacterial isolates MSP2 and
MSP10 were found positive for nitrogenase activity in
MSP1 Round medium, smooth, creamy Small rods -ve
acetylene reduction assay by reducing 58.9 ± 3.4 and
MSP2 Round small, smooth, light Small rods -ve
yellow 348 ± 15.6 n mole C2H2 h-1 mg-1 protein, respectively.
MSP3 Small round, smooth, greenish Small rods -ve Phosphate solubilization data indicated that all the bacterial
yellow isolates were able to solubilize phosphate except MSP4.
MSP4 Large round, smooth, creamy Small rods ?ve Phosphate solubilization efficiency ranged from 5.57 to
MSP5 Round medium, wavy, dark Medium -ve 11.73 lg ml-1 (Table 2).
creamy rods Further, these bacterial isolates were checked for
MSP6 Small, wavy, creamy Small rods ?ve legume root surface colonization. All the isolates showed
MSP7 Small, smooth, yellow Small rods -ve very high colonization on root surface of their respective
MSP8 Round medium, wavy, dark Small rods -ve hosts, which was statistically different. MSP9 was found to
creamy be most efficient colonizing bacteria (Fig. 1). Similarly,
MSP9 Round medium, smooth, creamy Very small -ve equally efficient biofilm formation ability on the abiotic
rod
surface (PVC) was also observed. Bacterial isolates
MSP10 Round medium, smooth, light Small rod -ve established a significantly different biofilm. Bacterial iso-
brown
lates MSP9 and MSP10 showed high efficiency in biofilm
formation on abiotic surface (Fig. 2).
Table 2 Comparison of plant growth promoting attributes of pea
nodule endophytic bacterial isolate Molecular identification of potential bacterial strains
Isolate IAA ARA Phosphate
production (n mole C2H2 solubilization Two bacterial strains were selected for phylogenetic iden-
(lg ml-1) reduced h-1mg-1 (lg ml-1) tification on the basis of plant growth promoting potential.
protein) Phylogenetic identification was performed using 16S rRNA
gene sequencing technique. DNA fragments of *1,500 bp
MSP1 1.38 ± 0.27d – 6.8 ± 0.33c
were amplified using primers P1 and P6 set (Fig. 3a). The
MSP2 – 58.9 ± 3.4b 11.73 ± 0.26a
DNA fragments were cloned in vector pTZ57R/T. When
MSP3 _ – 9.3 ± 0.43b
the clones were restricted with EcoRI and BamHI, DNA
MSP4 3.39 ± 0.33c – –
fragment of *2,900, 900 and 600 bp were observed,
MSP5 – – 5.57 ± 0.36c
which revealed that 16S rRNA gene fragments had the site
MSP6 – – 9.33 ± 0.36b
of either EcoRI or BamHI (Fig. 3b). 16S rRNA gene
MSP7 1.64 ± 0.29d – 9.2 ± 0.36b
sequences of the potential strains were compared with
MSP8 4.13 ± 0.3b – 6.85 ± 0.12c
others in sequence databases using NCBI BLAST software.
MSP9 16.16 ± 0.27a – 11.73 ± 0.27a
MSP9 showed 99 % similarity to different species of genus
MSP10 0.86 ± 0.12e 348 ± 15.6a 6.83 ± 0.18c
Ochrobactrum, while bacterial strains MSP10 showed
LSD 0.05 0.425 26.9 1.37 99 % similarity with the Enterobacter. 16S rRNA gene
Means are followed by the standard error sequences of MSP9 and MSP10 were deposited at NCBI
Mean sharing same letter in column do not differ significantly GenBank under the accession numbers JF313266 and
JF313267, respectively.
reinfect roots, but did not develop root nodule on their host,
sweet pea. Moreover, PS-I and PS-II (Rhizobium legu- Discussion
minosarum bv. viciae), which was used as positive control,
developed nodules on pea plants. Plant growth promoting bacteria is a group of soil bacteria
which promote plant growth by developing a positive
Characterization for plant growth promoting attributes relationship with roots, endophytically or in the rhizo-
sphere. Endophytic bacteria reside inside plant tissue and
All the bacterial endophytes were tested for plant growth can be isolated from surface sterilized plant tissues
promoting properties including IAA production, nitrogen (Garbeva et al. 2001). Root nodules of legume accommo-
fixation and phosphate solubilization (Table 2). date a large number of non-nodulating plant growth
123
World J Microbiol Biotechnol (2014) 30:719–725 723
80000
a
70000
b
60000 c
cfu/0.1 mg root .
cd cd
50000 de cde de
e
40000
f
30000
20000
10000
0
MSP1 MSP2 MSP3 MSP4 MSP5 MSP6 MSP7 MSP8 MSP9 MSP10
Isolates
Fig. 1 Colonization efficiency of nodule endophytic bacteria on pea roots. Each value is plotted as the mean ± SE (n = 3). Mean sharing same
letter in column do not differ significantly. LSD 0.05 = 7,699
0.8
0.7 a
0.6
Absorbance at 570nm
0.5 b
0.4
0.3
0.2 c cd cd
d cd
0.1 e
e e
0
MSP1 MSP2 MSP3 MSP4 MSP5 MSP6 MSP7 MSP8 MSP9 MSP10
Isolates
Fig. 2 Biofilm formation efficiency of nodule endophytic bacteria on abiotic surface (PVC). Each value is plotted as the mean ± SE (n = 16).
Mean sharing same letter in column do not differ significantly. LSD 0.05 = 0.0354
Fig. 3 a Amplified fragments Ladder Control MSP9 MSP10 Ladder Control MSP9 MSP10 GeneRuler 1kb
of 16S rRNA gene.
b Confirmation of 16S rRNA
gene cloning into vector
pTZ57R/T by restriction
analysis
a b
promoting bacteria along with rhizobia (Mishra et al. and identified as A. radiobacter in the clover plant. Agro-
2009). Occurrence of bacteria other than rhizobia in root bacterium spp. has also been reported to found in the
nodule was first reported by Beijerinck and Delden (1902) nodules of chick pea (Hameed et al. 2004). In this study,
123
724 World J Microbiol Biotechnol (2014) 30:719–725
we isolated ten fast growing bacteria from the nodules of intercellular space between the cortex and endoderm of
pea. These fast growing nodule endophytic bacteria were roots (Gough et al. 1997). In case of legumes, it is specu-
further tested for nodulation assay and it is found they were lated that non-nodulating endophytic bacteria might get
able to reinfect roots, but were unable to nodulate pea entrapped into the pocket of root hair during the process of
plant. These results strengthen the literature on the occur- curling and finally enter the nodule primordial where it
rence of non-rhizobial bacteria in the root nodules (Taurian may multiply in number, but this area further need to be
et al. 2012). Such a type of non-rhizobial bacteria within studied.
nodule establish a synergistic interaction with the rhizobia Considering all the findings, this is the first report on the
and promote plant growth (Bansal 2009). occurrence of Ochrobactrum and Enterobacter spp. in the
Generally, endophytic bacteria have better plant growth nodules of pea plant, which showed enormous potential for
promotion abilities to a certain extent than bacteria plant growth promotion. Furthermore, it is suggested that
restricted to the rhizoplane and rhizosphere (Dong et al. these bacterial strains can be used as biofertilizers alone or
2003). Therefore, non-rhizobial endophytic bacteria were in combination with other plant growth promoting bacteria
isolated from nodules, which could have plant growth for legumes and non-legume crops after field evaluation.
promoting potential. IAA production, nitrogen fixation,
phosphate solubilization, biofilm formation and root colo-
nization are some of the major characters to determine the References
growth promoting potential of plant beneficial bacteria
Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ (1990) Basic
(Bhattacharyya and Jha 2012; Phetcharat and Duangpaeng
local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215:403–410
2012). IAA produced by the plant associated bacteria Angus A, Hirsch AM (2010) Insights into the history of the legume
improves root development in legumes and non-legumes. beta-proteobacterial symbiosis. Mol Ecol 19:28–30
Additionally, in legumes IAA is also involved in the nodule Aravind R, Kumar A, Eapen SJ (2012) Pre-plant bacterisation: a
strategy for delivery of beneficial endophytic bacteria and
development (Fedorova et al. 2005; Patten and Glick
production of disease-free plantlets of black pepper (Piper
2002). Similarly, nitrogen fixed by bacteria benefits plant nigrum L.). Arch Phytopathol Plant Prot 45:1115–1126
by increasing their protein content (Fabre and Planchon Arnon DI, Hoagland DR (1940) Crop production in artificial culture
2000). Phosphate solubilizing ability of bacteria converts solution sand in soil with special reference to factors influencing
yields and absorption of inorganic nutrient. Soil Sci 50:463–483
insoluble form of phosphorus into the useable form, which
Bansal RK (2009) Synergistic effect of Rhizobium, PSB and PGPR on
is an important trait in sustainable farming for increased nodulation and grain yield of mung bean. J Food Legum 22:37–39
plant yield (Ekin 2010). Moreover, biofilm formation is a Beijerinck MW, Delden AV (1902) Uber die Assimilation des freien
key character of plant beneficial bacteria, which remained Stickstoffs durch Bakerien. Centralbl Bakt Abt II 9:3–43
Benhizia Y, Benhizia H, Benguedouar A, Muresu R, Giacomini A,
unnoticed in the past, enables the plant to withstand various
Squartini A (2004) Gamma proteobacteria can nodulate legumes
biotic and abiotic stress conditions (Hirsch 2010a, b; of the genus Hedysarum. Syst Appl Microbiol 27:462–468
Seneviratne et al. 2011). All the isolated bacteria showed Bhattacharyya PN, Jha DK (2012) Plant growth-promoting rhizobac-
potential of different plant growth promoting characters at teria (PGPR): emergence in agriculture. World J Microbiol
Biotechnol 28:1327–1350
varying level. Bacterial isolates MSP9 and MSP10 were
Birnboim HC, Doly A (1979) A rapid alkaline extraction procedure
found highly efficient in almost all the characters, espe- for screening recombinant plasmid DNA. Nucleic Acids Res
cially in biofilm formation. These finding suggest the use of 7:1513–1523
these bacterial strains as biofertilizers after field testing. Dong Y, Iniguez LA, Ahmer BMM (2003) Kinetics and strain
specificity of rhizosphere and endophytic colonization by enteric
Further, 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis of the
bacteria on seedlings of Medicago sativa and Medicago trunca-
potential strains revealed that pea nodules were colonized tula. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:1783–1790
by the non-nodulating bacteria belong to genera Ochro- Duangpaeng A, Phetcharat P, Chanthapho S, Boonkantong N, Okuda
bactrum and Enterobacter. These genera are well known N (2012) The study and development of endophytic bacteria for
enhancing organic rice growth. Procedia Eng 32:172–176
for having endophytic bacteria, which colonize the root
Ekin Z (2010) Performance of phosphate solubilizing bacteria for
nodule of legume plants and improve nodulation when co- improving growth and yield of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.)
inoculated with rhizobia (Ibanez et al. 2009; Tripathi et al. in the presence of phosphorus fertilizer. Afr J Biotechnol
2006; Xu et al. 1994). These results strengthen the litera- 9:3794–3800
Fabre F, Planchon C (2000) Nitrogen nutrition, yield and protein
ture on the endophytic nature of Ochrobactrum and
content in soybean. Plant Sci 152:51–58
Enterobacter spp. in pea plant. Generally, literature is Fedorova E, Redondo FJ, Koshiba T, de Felipe MR, Pueyo JJ, Lucas
fragmentary on the mode of infection of endophytic bac- MM (2005) Aldehyde oxidase (AO) in the root nodules of
teria to plant. It is hitherto known that endophytic bacteria Lupinus albus and Medicago truncatula: identification of AO in
meristematic and infection zones. Mol Plant Microbe Interact
enter the plant roots in a two steps process. Initially, bac-
18:405–413
teria colonize at the points of emergence of lateral roots Fraile B, Paniagua R, Rodriguez MC (1988) Long day photoperiods
called lateral root cracks, and then bacteria move into and temperature of 20 °C induce spermatogenesis in blinded and
123
World J Microbiol Biotechnol (2014) 30:719–725 725
non-blinded marbled newts during the period of testicular Patel HA, Patel RK, Khristi SM, Parikh K, Rajendran G (2012)
quiescence. Biol Reprod 39:649–655 Isolation and characterization of bacterial endophytes from
Fujishige NA, Kapadia NN, De Hoff PL, Hirsch AM (2006) Lycopersicon esculentum plant and their plant growth promoting
Investigations of Rhizobium biofilm formation. FEMS Microbiol characteristics. Nepal J Biotechnol 2:37–52
Ecol 56:195–206 Patten CL, Glick BR (2002) Role of Pseudomonas putida indole
Garbeva P, Overbeek LS, Vuurde JW (2001) Analysis of endophytic acetic acid in development of the host plant root system. Appl
bacterial communities of potato by plating and denaturing Environ Microbiol 68:3795–3801
gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) of 16S rDNA based PCR Phetcharat P, Duangpaeng A (2012) Screening of endophytic bacteria
fragments. Microb Ecol 41:369–383 from organic rice tissue for indole acetic acid production.
Gordon SA, Weber RP (1951) Calorimetric estimation of indoleacetic Procedia Eng 32:177–183
acid. Plant Physiol 26:192–195 Pikovskaya R (1948) Mobilization of P in soil in connection with vital
Gough C, Vasse J, Galera C, Webster G, Cocking E, Denarie J (1997) activity by some microbial species. Microbiologica 17:362–370
Interactions between bacterial diazotrophs and non-legume Selvakumar G, Kundu S, Gupta AD, Shouche YS, Gupta HS (2008)
dicots: Arabidopsis thaliana as a model plant. Plant Soil Isolation and characterization of nonrhizobial plant growth
194:123–130 promoting bacteria from nodules of Kudzu (Pueraria thunbergi-
Hameed S, Yasmin S, Malik KA, Zafar Y, Hafeez FY (2004) ana) and their effect on wheat seedling growth. Curr Microbiol
Rhizobium, Bradyrhizobium and Agrobacterium strains isolated 56:134–139
from cultivated legumes. Biol Fertil Soils 39:179–185 Seneviratne G, Weerasekara MLMAW, Seneviratne KACN, Zavahir
Hardy RWF, Holsten RD, Jackson EK, Burns RE (1968) The JS, Kecskes ML, Kennedy IR (2011) Importance of biofilm
acetylene-ethylene assay for nitrogen fixation: laboratory and formation in plant growth promoting rhizobacterial action.
field evaluation. Plant Physiol 43:1185–1207 Microbiol Monogr 18:81–95
Hirsch AM (2010) How rhizobia survive in the absence of a legume Steel RGD, Torrie JH (1980) Analysis of covariance. In: Principles
host, a stressful world indeed. In: Seckbach J, Grube M (eds) and procedures of statistics: a biometrical approach. McGraw-
Symbiosis and stress: cellular origin, life in extreme habitats and Hill, New York
astrobiology. Springer 17, pp 375–391 Sturz AV, Christie BR, Matheson BG, Nowak J (1997) Biodiversity
Hirsch AM (2010b) Insights into the history of the legume beta- of endophytic bacteria which colonize red clover nodules, roots,
proteobacterial symbiosis. Mol Ecol 19:28–30 stems and foliage and their influence on host growth. Biol Fertil
Ibanez F, Angelini J, Taurian T, Tonelli ML, Fabra A (2009) Soils 25:13–19
Endophytic occupation of peanut root nodules by opportunistic Tan Z, Xu X, Wang E, Gao J, Martinez-Romero E, Chen W (1997)
Gammaproteobacteria. Syst Appl Microbiol 32:49–55 Phylogenetic and genetic relationships of Mesorhizobium tian-
Kobayashi DY, Palumbo JD (2000) Bacterial endophytes and their shanense and related rhizobia. Int J Syst Bacteriol 47:874–879
effects on plants and uses in agriculture. In: James CW, White JF Tariq M, Hameed S, Yasmeen T, Ali A (2012) Non-rhizobial bacteria
(eds) Microbial endophytes. Marcel Dekker Inc, New York, for improved nodulation and grain yield of mung bean [Vigna
pp 199–233 radiata (L.) Wilczek]. Afr J Biotechnol 11:15012–15019
Ma W, Guinel FC, Glick BR (2003) Rhizobium leguminosarum Taurian T, Ibanez F, Angelini J, Tonelli ML, Fabra A (2012)
biovar viciae 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase Endophytic bacteria and their role in legumes growth promotion.
promotes nodulation of pea plants. Appl Environ Microbiol Bact Agrobiol Plant Probiotics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Hei-
69:4396–4402 delberg, pp 141–168
Marsudi NDS, Glenn AR, Dilworth MJ (1999) Identification and Tien TM, Gaskins MH, Hubbell DH (1979) Plant growth substances
characterization of fast- and slow-growing root nodule bacteria produced by Azospirillum brazilense and their effect on the
from South-Western Australian soils able to nodulate Acacia growth of pearl millet. Appl Environ Microbiol 37:1016–1024
saligna. Soil Biol Biochem 31:1229–1238 Tripathi AK, Verma SC, Chowdhury SP, Lebuhn M, Gattinger A,
Mishra PK, Mishra S, Selvakumar G, Bisht JK, Kundu S, Gupta HS Schloter M (2006) Ochrobactrum oryzae sp. nov., an endophytic
(2009) Coinoculation of Bacillus thuringeinsis-KR1 with Rhi- bacterial species isolated from deep-water rice in India. Int J Syst
zobium leguminosarum enhances plant growth and nodulation of Evol Microbiol 56:1677–1680
pea (Pisum sativum L.) and lentil (Lens culinaris L.). World J Vincent JM (1970) A manual for the practical study of root nodule
Microbiol Biotechnol 25:753–761 bacteria. Blackwell Science Publisher, Oxford
Nair A, Juwarkar A, Singh S (2007) Production and characterization Xu Y, Yokota A, Sanada H, Hisamatsu M, Araki M, Cho HJ,
of siderophores and its application in arsenic removal from Morinaga T, Murooka Y (1994) Enterobacter cloacae A105,
contaminated soil. Water Air Soil Pollut 180:199–212 isolated from the surface of root nodules of Astragalus sinicus
Okan YS, Albercht L, Burris RH (1977) Methods of growing cv. Japan, stimulates nodulation by Rhizobium huakuii bv.
Spirillum lipoferum and for counting the pure culture in Renge. J Ferment Bioeng 77:630–635
association and with plant. Appl Environ Microbiol 33:85–88
123