Analysis of Expansion Joint - A Case Study

9 X October 2021
https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2021.38367
International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET)
ISSN: 2321-9653; IC Value: 45.98; SJ Impact Factor: 7.429
Volume 9 Issue X Oct 2021- Available at www.ijraset.com
Analysis of Expansion Joint - A Case Study

Prof. P R Subramaniam1, G. Rakshan Kumar2
1
Associate Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, LENDI Institute of Engineering &Technology, Vizianagaram, India
2
Department of Mechanical Engineering, LENDI Institute of Engineering &Technology, Vizianagaram, India
Abstract: Automotive, Aerospace, Pipeline industries widely use Bellows. Different types of bellows are used in these industries.
The bellows are used for contraction or expansion applications. Repeated variable pressure loading and displacement on
Metallic bellows joints results in bellows failure. This paper is a comprehensive modeling and analysis of an axial type exhaust
metallic bellow due to varying pressure load and circumferential and radial displacement. All analysis completed using ANSYS
software considering variable pressure load and cylindrical displacement as a boundary condition and perused the
consequences. Stress distribution in the conditions of Case (i) variable pressure load and Case (ii) displacement are obtained.
Keywords: ANSYS, FE Bellows, Finite Element Analysis, Bellow Failures
I. INTRODUCTION
A flexible connection (Bellow) is as shown in Figure 1. Some displacement takes place because of the skewed path of the
connection system and considerable def lections must be allowed. The usage of a rigid joint would result in severe system vibration,
noise, and early failure owing to material strength exceeding the limit. This was my experience with off-the-shelf products: they
rarely fit unique applications. Failures occurred after very short operating times (Ref. Figure 2), and the problem was not solved by
substituting stronger and significantly more expensive materials.
An Externally Pressurized Expansion Joint, unlike a traditional expansion joint, takes pressure from the outside of the bellows
element rather than the inside. Due to the squirm associated with the longer bellow’s length, excessive axial movements cannot be
contained in typical expansion joints with internally pressured bellows.
To give the flexibility needed to absorb mechanical movements, the flexible tube is made up of a thin walled shell with
corrugations. To analyze the behavior of the flexible tube is challenging because of its geometric complexity.
II. LITERATURE REVIEW

Several publications address various characteristics of flexible tubes, including internal pressure and axial deflection stresses,
fatigue life estimations [2] and instability.
The problems of axially symmetric deformation of flexible pipes have been discussed by Chien WZ, Ming WU. and Qian H.[4,5]
and were examined using the finite difference method by Hamada M, Nakagawa K, Miyata K.[6]
A good knowledge of bellow tube research can also be obtained from the conference proceedings of the 1989 ASME Pressure
Vessels and Piping Conference [3].
Correction factors relating the behavior of the bellow convolution was derived by Anderson WF. [7] This method has eventually
been the premise of requirements and guidebook furnishing formulae for hand-calculation of bellow specifications
Figure-1: Expansion Bellows
©IJRASET: All Rights are Reserved 45

Figure-2: Failed Expansion Bellow
A few formulae were covered in ASME regulations on pressure vessel design, which is widely recognized. However, “The Standards
of the Expansion Joint Manufacturers” is the complete and extensively accepted textual content on Bellow design. [1]
The EJMA requirements had been compared, with finite element and experimental analyses in different papers. An evaluation of the
ASME standards and the EJMA requirements given by Hanna, conclude that the two conform pretty nicely in maximum aspects.
III. GEOMETRY
The Geometry for the FEA consists of the Expansion Joint i.e. Bellow. Figure 3 displays the geometry profile for the analysis. It
was modeled; meshed in ANSYS. The mesh consists of 18,802 nodes and 18836 Elements. Figure 4 refers the pressure load
variation from 0.01MPa to 0.16MPa applied at the cap end as boundary condition within time span 0-1sec.
Physical dimensions and Material properties used in analysis are described in Table 1. ANSYS is used as the solver for stress
analysis and results
Figure-3: Model used for FEA
(a) Physical dimension

Radius of Pitch Number of Thickness Inner
Convolution (mm) Convolutions (mm) Diameter
(mm) (mm)
7.75 15 7 0.5 156
b) Material properties
Tensile Yield Ultimate Young’s Poision’s
Stress Tensile Stress Modulus Ratio
(MPa) (MPa) (GPa)
240 515 193 0.29
Table-1: Physical dimensions and material properties

IV. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS

A. Case I- Effect Variable Pressure Load on Cap End
Pressure variation from 0.01MPa to 0.16Mpa as shown in figure 5 is acting on the cap end resulting in maximum stress around
convolution root from the end cap within 1 second. Stress distribution and deformed shape are as shown in Figure 4. Max. and Min
Values of equivalent stress, directional deformation and total deformation are given in table-2.
Pressure Time
Fig- 4: Pressure load variation over time
Figure-5: Stress distribution and deformed shape
Results
Equivalent Directional Total
Stress Deformation Deformation
(MPa) (mm) (mm)
Minimum 0. -2.1443e-002 0.
Maximum 34.493 2.031e-002 8.9555e-003
Minimum Value Over Time
Minimum 0. 2.1443e-002 0.
Maximum 0. 2.6804e-003 0.
Maximum Value Over Time
Minimum 4.3117 2.5388e-003 8.9555e-003
Maximum 34.493 2.031e-002 7.1644e-002
Table-2: Equivalent (Von-Mises) Stress, Directional Deformation and Total Deformation

Variation of equivalent stress, Directional Deformation and Total Deformation with respect to time are graphically shown in figures 6
to 9
It can be seen from the analysis that when the Bellow is undergoing expansion and contraction, with momentary pressure fluctuations
also stress arises and as the pressure increases from 0.1MPa to 0.16MPa, stress and the deformation at the corners increases as shown
in Figure-5 leading to its failure.
Stress Time
Figure-6: Equivalent Stress
Directional Deformation Time

Figure-7: Directional Deformation
Total Deformation Time

Figure-8: Total Deformation

Figure- 9: Equivalent Max and Min Stress
B. Case II- Effect of Displacement Load

Figure 10 refers cylindrical displacement varying from 0.0 to 0.1 mm applied as boundary condition.
Displacement Time
Figure 10 Applied Displacement Load
Figure 10 shows stress distribution and deformed shape. The maximum deformation occurs around convolution root near the end
cap for a displacement from 0.1mm. Values of Total Deformation, Equivalent Stress Equivalent Elastic Strain are given in Table-3
below. The equivalent stress increases linearly as the cylindrical displacement increases and as it crosses 0.025mm failure takes
place at 0.346 sec
The stress, deformation and elastic strain exhibits an upward trend with the increase of deflection.
Results
Total Equivalent Stress Equivalent
Deformation (MPa) Elastic
(mm) Strain
mm/mm
Minimum 0 0 0.
Maximum 0.18741 1337.7 8.3872e-003
Minimum Value Over Time
Minimum 0. 0 0.
Maximum 0. 0 0.
Maximum Value Over Time
Minimum 0.18741. 1337.7 8.3872e-003
Maximum 0.18741. 1337.7 8.3872e-003
Table-3 Total Deformation, Equivalent Stress, Equivalent Elastic Strain

From the analysis displacement variation during assembly with corresponding mating combined with pressure fluctuations during
operation appears to be the cause of premature failure of Bellows.
Figure 9 Total Deformation
Figure 10 Equivalent Stress
Figure 11 Equivalent Elastic Strain

V. CONCLUSION
The effects of the pressure and displacement variation on the failure of Bellows examined in this study are summarized as follows;
A. The equivalent stress increases linearly and the stress exhibits an upward trend with an increase of pressure at the bellow’s cap
end.
B. The stress increase is leading to failure with the increase of deflection at the Bellow’s cap end.
C. Displacement above 0.09mm and Pressure above 0.11Mpa has a significant effect in contributing towards failure of the Bellow.
VI. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The author(s) would like to thank for the substantial support from the Lendi Institute of Engineering and Technology,
Vizianagaram.
REFERENCES
[1] Standards of the Expansion Joint Manufacturers Association (EJMA) Inc. 6th ed., New York.1993
[2] Conference on the ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping 1989, 9–13: Stresses and fatigue of U shaped bellows by Ting-Xin L, Bing-Liang G, Tian-Xiang L,
Qing-Chen W.
[3] Conference on ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping 1989: Metallic bellows and expansion joints by Becht IV C, Imazu A, Jetter R, Reimus WS
[4] Appl Math Mech. 1986; 7(6):573–85: Solving geometrical non linear problem of Axi-symmetrical shells by Qian H.
[5] Appl Math Mech.1983; 4(5):649–655: U-shaped bellows-calculations by Chien WZ, Ming WU.
[6] Bulletin of JSME 1971; 14(71):401–9: Deformation of U-shaped bellows by Hamada M, Nakagawa K, Miyata K. Bending
[7] Atomic International; United States Atomic Energy Commission, 1965 NAA-SR-4527, Analysis of stresses in Bellows by Anderson WF.

Analysis of Expansion Joint - A Case Study

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Analysis of Expansion Joint - A Case Study

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Analysis of Expansion Joint - A Case Study

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

9 X October 2021

Analysis of Expansion Joint - A Case Study

II. LITERATURE REVIEW

Figure-1: Expansion Bellows

©IJRASET: All Rights are Reserved 45

Figure-2: Failed Expansion Bellow

Figure-3: Model used for FEA

(a) Physical dimension

©IJRASET: All Rights are Reserved 46

IV. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS

Fig- 4: Pressure load variation over time

Figure-5: Stress distribution and deformed shape

©IJRASET: All Rights are Reserved 47

Figure-6: Equivalent Stress

Directional Deformation Time

Total Deformation Time

©IJRASET: All Rights are Reserved 48

Figure- 9: Equivalent Max and Min Stress

B. Case II- Effect of Displacement Load

©IJRASET: All Rights are Reserved 49

Figure 9 Total Deformation

Figure 10 Equivalent Stress

Figure 11 Equivalent Elastic Strain

©IJRASET: All Rights are Reserved 50

©IJRASET: All Rights are Reserved 51

You might also like