POM CIA - Christ University
POM CIA - Christ University
POM CIA - Christ University
Articles Reviewed:
1. Carasco-Saul, M., Kim, W., & Kim, T. (2014). Leadership and Employee Engagement. Human Resource Development Review,
14(1), 38–63.
2. S, Swathi. (2013). Impact of Leadership On Employee Engagement. International Journal of Marketing, Financial Services &
Management Research
3. Strom, D. L., Sears, K. L., & Kelly, K. M. (2013). Work Engagement: The Roles of Organizational Justice and Leadership Style
in Predicting Engagement Among. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 21(1), 71–82
4. Wang, D.-S., & Hsieh, C.-C. (2013). The effect of authentic leadership on employee trust and employee engagement. Social
Behavior and Personality, 41(4), 613–624
5. Gruman, J. A., & Saks, A. M. (2011). Performance management and employee engagement. Human Resource Management
Review, 21(2), 123–136
Introduction
Employees are at the heart of every organisation – they make up the institution, run it and help it to survive and thrive in a
competitive environment. Employee engagement refers to an individual’s extent of commitment and involvement towards the
organisation and its values. This is a key concept in matters of worker retention, managing employee satisfaction and, eventually,
organisational performance. Kahn (1990) introduced the concept of individual engagement as when “people employ and express
themselves, physically, cognitively or emotionally during role performances” (p. 964), which has become the fundamental concept for
what is described as employee engagement.
It is often found that employees leave a company because of poor management and the manager himself/herself rather than the
company indicating that leadership styles, to a great degree, decide and help predict employee behaviour. From a bird’s eye view,
employee dissatisfaction is either caused by the employees themselves or their manager and the organisation’s inability to prevent
such behaviour on the part of the superior or not having empowered the individual to speak about their issues freely to the company.
Constructive criticism is an essential tool in improving the effectiveness of an organisation. Employee voice is defined as "non-
required behaviour that emphasises expression of constructive challenge with the intent to improve rather than merely criticise" (Van
Dyne & LePine, 1998). Several studies argue that voice behaviour is dependent on the person and the situation, and, hence, employee
voice cannot be self-oriented. They, also, hypothesise that as critical opinions can be viewed in a negative light by fellow colleagues,
an individual may perceive challenging the status quo as a potential risk. If constructive opinions are perceived as complaints or
criticism of personal in nature, they can create unfavourable impressions or upset balance in interpersonal relations in the workplace.
There are several schools of thought that attempt at exploring the connection between employee voice and employee engagement.
This is in line with the findings that individuals that have possess psychological safety and the confidence to speak up publicly
regarding discrepancies and are able to share opinions with the organisation fee empowered and valued and, hence, are able to
successfully engage themselves with the organisation’s goals.
The literature review detailed below attempts to understand how leadership affects employee engagement in an organisation.
Literature Review
Introduced in 1990, there has not been any rigorous research conducted in the concept of employee engagement; hence, it can
be said that it is a relatively new concept. Howard and Foster (2009) view personal engagement as a vital tool in managing talent that
does not only fortify the competitiveness of the firm but also, enhance the organisational reputation because it helps to reduce the
employee attrition rate in a business firm.
Authentic leadership refers to leader behaviour that aims to promote positive psychological attitude and ethical climate that
encourages self-awareness and transparency of how leaders work with the employees. Personal engagement has a significant impact
on individual job satisfaction and, in turn, the organisation’s performance.
In a nutshell, engaged employees have a much smoother relationship with their superiors compared to the disengaged ones (Van den
Broeck et al., 2008) as they encourage team-spirit and togetherness amongst the workers.
The sample group used for the research conducted in the journals mainly consist of employees from manufacturing companies. Data
were collected via an investigator developed questionnaire, and responses for all scales were made on a 5-point Likert scale ranging
from 1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree. Because self-report measures were collected on a single occasion from the employee
himself or herself, steps were taken to attempt to reduce the potential influences of social desirability and common method bias.