Performance Analysis of A Domestic Refrigerator Using Various Alternative Reffrigerant
Performance Analysis of A Domestic Refrigerator Using Various Alternative Reffrigerant
Performance Analysis of A Domestic Refrigerator Using Various Alternative Reffrigerant
e-ISSN: 2278-1684,p-ISSN: 2320-334X, Volume 14, Issue 3 Ver. I (May. - June. 2017), PP 92-103
www.iosrjournals.org
Abstract: This work presents the development process of Refrigerator test ring and then carry- out the
performance analysis of domestic refrigerator. The experiment platform which is called refrigerator test ring
will be developed from refrigerator model. Performance of refrigerator also depends on inlet and outlet
condition of each components. So in this research work refrigerator test ring will be developed and obtain
performance of domestic refrigerator in term of Refrigeration Capacity, Compressor Work and Coefficient of
Performance (COP) by determining two important parameter during operating condition which are
temperature and pressure. So carry out this project I use different alternative refrigerant and find the data and
compare the data to each other and then find the alternate of R 134a
I. Introduction
What is Refrigeration?
Refrigeration is defined as the process of removing heat from a body or enclosed space so that the temperature
first lowered and then maintained at level below the temperature of surrounding. The equipment used to
maintain the required temperature is called refrigerating equipment.
The process starts with vaporization of the refrigerant in the evaporator. This is complete at point 2.
Compression is used to raise the pressure of the refrigerant, point 3, so that it can condense at a higher
temperature. When all the vapour has condensed, point 4, the pressure is reduced in an expansion device, and
the refrigerant is returned to its original condition.
1. Compressor
It compresses the refrigerant. The compressor receives low pressure gas from the evaporator and
converts it to high pressure gas. As the gas is compressed, the temperature rises. The hot refrigerant gas
then flows to the condenser.
2. Condenser
A condenser is a device or unit used to condense a substance from its gaseous to its liquid state, by
cooling it. In so doing, the latent heat is given up by the substance, and will transfer to the condenser
coolant.
3. Expansion Valve
Its function is to meter the amount of refrigerant to be supplied to evaporator and to reduce the pressure up
to evaporator pressure such that liquid can vaporise at the evaporator coil.
4. Evaporator
An evaporator is used in an air-conditioning system to allow a compressed cooling refrigerant, to
evaporate from liquid to gas while absorbing heat in the process. It can also be used to remove water or
other liquids from mixtures.
Expansion is a constant enthalpy process. It is drawn as a vertical line on the above P-h diagram. No
heat is absorbed or rejected during this expansion, the liquid just passes through a valve, like water coming out
of a tap. The difference is, that because the liquid is saturated at the start of expansion by the end of the
process it is partly vapour. Point 1 is inside the curve and not on the curve as described in the
Evaporation process. The refrigerant at the beginning of the vaporization is already partly evaporated. This
depends on the shape of the curve, and the start and end pressures. The Compression process is shown as a
curve. It is not a constant enthalpy process. The energy used to compress the vapour turns into heat, and
increases its temperature. This tends to raise the temperature of the vapour, making point 3 move further into
the superheated part of the diagram as compression progresses. Point 3 is outside the curve as described in the
Compression process. This means that before Condensation can start, the vapour has to be cooled down.
Domestic Refrigerator
This Section provides the information about the how I was developed the experiment set up and how I
will carry out the test procedure the during experiment. First the experiment test ring developed from the
refrigerator model. To perform the experiment and develop the test ring 230L refrigerator is selected. and Fig.
shows the line diagram of test ring and connection point of pressure and temperature measurement. Now from
the experiment test ring there 6 point of temperature measurement and 2 point of pressure measurement. Two
point of pressure measurement one of the one point in suction side and another point is in discharge line. The
pressure gauge are used for the pressure measurement so compound gauge is fitted on discharge line due to high
pressure and vacuum gauge is fitted on suction line due to low pressure as shown in the fig. Now there five
pointis is temperature measurement so one the point of temperature measurement is in evaporator means in the
freezer compartment of refrigerator. One point is for the measurement of food storage cabinet. And point is
located on the compressor inlet, compressor outlet, condenser inlet and condenser outlet. So now for the
temperature measurement digital thermometer are used. Ammeter is also used for the current measurement. So
this the procedure of the experiment set up
Now for the test procedure the evacuation and vacuuming is done by the another compressor. And
vacuum is done up to the 25in/hg. This is required for the cleaning of the lines by removing moisture, air and
oil. Now after that the refrigerant is charged by the charging system and when the evaporator temp. set at 10 oc
and 1st I charged the R 134a and collected the data like pressure and temperature every 15 minutes during the
running the refrigerator and also collected the data various evaporator temperature. After collecting the data R
134a is removed and refrigerator are charged by another alternative refrigerant like R 290, R 600, R 152a and
mixture of the different refrigerant and collected the data. After collecting the experimental data I found
different parameter like COP, Refrigerant effect, Compressor power, Volumetric cooling capacity, mass flow
rate , compressor power per ton, compression ratio etc. and then compare this data each other to the refrigerant
and find the alternative refrigerant which gives the better performance in compare with R 134a.
So in this way I will be found the best alternative of R 134a
II. Calculation
1. Compressor Work done (w) = (h2 – h1) KJ/Kg
2. Refrigerant effect Per Kg (RE) = (h1 – h3) KJ/Kg
Refrigerant effect
3. COP =
Compressor work done
3.517
4. Mass flow rate =
RE
Discharge pressure
5. Compression ratio =
Suction pressure
6. Compressor power per ton = Mass flow rate × Compressor work done
RE 113.34
7. Volumetric refrigerant efficincy = = = 2942.15kg/m3
Vg1 0.04944
Notes:- Values of h1, h2, hf3, h4 are calculated by using pressure enthalpy diagram related to the various
alternative refrigerant during calculation.
As shown in the fig. at the staring of refrigerator the evaporating temp. of all refrigerant is set to 10 oc
and as the refrigerator run the evaporator temp. is decrease and after some time it achieve to constant temp.
During the starting of 15 minute evaporator temp. drop is high for all refrigerant and among the refrigerants
R290 has high temp. drop and R 134a has low temp. drop. As shown in the fig R132a and R152A has achieved
highest evaporating temp. after 150 min. and R 600 and R600a has a low evaporating temp.
As shown in the fig5.2 the discharge temp. as the staring of refrigerator islow and than increase as the
refrigerator and as the time pass the increase rate in discharge temp. is low and after some time it achieve
constant temperature. So amoung the Refrigerant R290 has a highest discharge temp. while R 600 has a lowest
discharge temp.
As shown in fig 5.3 the cop at staring of refrigerator is high and R 290 and R152a has a high COP as
the starting and as the time goes the cop all refrigerant is start decreasing and reach the constant value. So
from the fig is the clear that the COP of R 152a has a high value than another refrigerant and COP of R 290
and R 436a is also near to the COP of R 134a. And the refrigerant R 600 has low COP compare with another
refrigerant blend of R 134/R 600an has low COP. Bt from fig. its also say that the R 152 and R 290 give the
better performance than another alternate refrigerant. So its possible that the R 152a and R 290 has a better
alternate refrigerant.
As Shown in fig 5.4 COP decrease as the evaporator temp. is decreasing and R 152a has a high COP at low
evaporating temp. and the blend of R 600/134 and R 600 has low COP at low evaporating temp.
As shown in the fig at staring of the time the refrigerant is high and than it is start deceasing as the time
pass away and one time refrigerant effect is become constant it is due to the setting temp. difference in the
cabinet . Now from fig is clear that the refrigerant effect of R 290 has high value than any another refrigerant .
But at a same time the refrigerant effect is low for R 134a refrigerant. And from the fig it is also clear that the
after some time refrigerant effect has a constant value.
Now from above fig it also clear that the with increasing the evaporator temp. the net refrigerant effect
also decrease and achieve the constant value. Refrigerant R 152a and R 134a around the -35oc evaporating
temp. low refrigerant effect and also achieve the constant value. While as a same temp. refrigerant R 290 and R
436a high refrigerant effect among the refrigerant
As shown in fig at the staring of the time the compressor work done is low but as the time increase the
compressor work done also increase and after some time it become a constant. The rate of increasing the
compressor work done is most of the same for all of the refrigerant. From fig it I clear that the compressor
work done is low for R 134a and R 152a than another refrigerants . while the work done by the R 290 and R
436a Refrigerant is quite high than R 134a .Now compressor work for refrigerant R 600 is high and also work
done for refrigerant R 600a is high than another refrigerant
As shown in fig it is clear that the Compressor work increasing as the evaporation temp increase. For R 134a at
-35othe compressor work is low than another refrigerant bt work done by the R 152a is near the work done of R
134a. And as the same evaporator temp. work done for R 600 and R 600a is high than another refrigerant
Now fig 5.10 its shows the variation of volumetric refrigerant capacity to the evaporator temp. from
fig.it is clear that the VRC decrease as the evaporated temp. decrease so it is clear that the R 290 has high
volumetric refrigerant capacity and R 134a and R 152a has a slightly low volumetric refrigerant capacity as
compared to the R290 refrigerant. While as same temp. refrigerant R 600 and R 600a has low volumetric
refrigerant capacity than another refrigerant.
So from fig. it is clear that the avg. COP of the R 152a is high than another refrigerant and also high
than R 134a and also avg. COP of R 290 is near the R 134a. while avg. COP of mixture of R 134 and R 600 is
very low. Avg. COP of R 153a is 3.8 and R 134a 3.6 and lowest COP is 1.50 of mixture of R 134a and R 600
As shown in the fig the compression ratio increase with decrease the evaporator temp. From fig, it is
clear that the mixture of R 134a and R 600 and R 600 has high compression ratio and R 134a and R152a has
same compression ratio while the Refrigerant R 290 and mixture of R 134a and R 290 has low compression
ratio as same temp than any other refrigerant.
As shown in the fig Compressor power per ton is increase as the temp. of evaporator increase.
Compressor power per ton is high for the mixture of R134a and R600 and refrigerant R 600. While compressor
power per ton is low for R 134a refrigerant and at -30oc temp. compressor power is same for refrigerant R 152a
and R 134a
But R152a and R290 refrigerants has approximately same performance with the R134a. So R152a and R290 has
good alternate of R134a refrigerant.
References
[1]. Performance comparison of vapour-compression refrigeration system using various alternative refrigerants A.S. Dalkilic, S.
Wongwises
[2]. The study and performance of a modified conventional refrigerator to serve as a PV powered one Socrates Kaplanis, Nikolaos
Papanastasiou
[3]. Performance of a domestic refrigerator under influence of varied expansion device capacity, refrigerant charge and ambient
temperature Erik Bjork, Bjorn Palm
[4]. Theoretical analysis of a vapour compression refrigeration system with R502, R404A and 507A Akhilesh Arora, S.C.
Kaushik
[5]. A review on exergy analysis of vapour compression refrigeration system J.U. Ahamed, R. Saidur, H.H. Masjuki
[6]. Vapour Compression Refrigeration Systems, nptel IIT Kharagpur
[7]. Khorshid E., Alshiraan B., Alsairafi A., Alzemi A., Allahddad A., 2011,
[8]. “Performance investigation on new refrigerant mixture”pp15-20.
[9]. Rasti M., Hatamipour M.S., Aghmiri S.F., Tavakoli M., 2012, “Enhancement of domestic refrigerator‟s energy
efficiency index using a hydrocarbon mixture refrigerant,” Measurement 45 pp:1807–1813.
[10]. Sattar M. A., Saidur R., Masjuki H. H., 2007 “Performance investigation of domestic refrigerator using pure hydrocarbons
and blends of hydrocarbons as refrigerants,” World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology 29 pp:223–228.
[11]. Saidur R., Kazi S.N., Hossain M.S., Rahman M.M., Mohammed H.A.,
[12]. 2011, “A review on the performance of nano particles suspended with refrigerants and lubricating oils in refrigeration systems,”
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15,pp: 310–323.
[13]. Corberan J. M., Segurado J., Colbourne D., Gonzalvez J., 2008, “Review of standards for the use of hydrocarbon refrigerants in
A/C, heat pump and refrigeration equipment,” International Journal of Refrigeration 31, pp:
[14]. 748–756.
[15]. Cengel Y. A., Bole M. A., Thermodynamics, An Engineering Approach 7e. pp:610-611.
[16]. Chen S., Judge J. F., Groll E. A., Radermacher R., 1994, “Theoretical Analysis of Hydrocarbon Refrigerant Mixtures as
a Replacement for HCFC -22 for Residential Uses”, International Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Conference, pp: 225-230.
[17]. Kim M. H., Lim B. H., Chu E. S., 8 Oct 1998, “The Performance Analysis of a Hydrocarbon Refrigerant R-600a in a Household
Refrigerator/Freezer”, KSME International Journal, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp.753~ 760.
[18]. Liu Z., Haider I., Liu B. Y., Radermacher R., 1994, “Test Results of Hydrocarbon Mixtures in Domestic
Refrigerator/Freezers”, Center for Environmental Energy Engineering (CEEE) University of Maryland College Park, Maryland,
USA, PP: 22-31.
[19]. Maclaine-cross I. L., Leonardi E., June 1997, “Why Hydrocarbons Save Energy”, School of Mechanical and Manufacturing
Engineering The University of New South Wales Sydney NSW, Australia 2052, Published in AIRAH Journal, Volume 51 No. 6,
pp. 33–37.
[20]. Baskaran A., Mathews P. K., September 2012, “A Performance Comparison of Vapour Compression Refrigeration
System Using Eco Friendly Refrigerants of Low Global Warming Potential”, International Journal of Scientific and Research
Publications, Volume 2, Issue 9, ISSN2250-3153, pp: 1-8.
[21]. Almeida I. M. G., Barbosa C. R. F., Fontes F. A. O., December 2010, “THERMODYNAMIC AND Thermophysical
Assessment Of Hydrocarbons Application In Househould Refrigerator”, Engenharia Térmica (Thermal Engineering), Vol. 9, N
O 01 E 02, Pp. 19-27,