FM09-CH 14
FM09-CH 14
FM09-CH 14
CHAPTER 14
Problem 1
1
I. M. Pandey, Financial Management, 9th Edition, New Delhi: Vikas.
Problem 2
Plan I Equity
No. of shares 20,000
Price (Rs) 10
Equity capital (Rs) 200,000
(Rs)
PBIT 5,000 12,000 25,000
Less : Interest 0 0 0
PBT 5,000 12,000 25,000
Less : Tax 1,750 4,200 8,750
PAT 3,250 7,800 16,250
EPS (T = 0.35) 0.16 0.39 0.81
EPS (T = 0) 0.25 0.60 1.25
Problem 3
2
Ch. 14: Financial and Operating Leverage
(Rs lakh)
EBIT 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Interest 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PBT 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
PAT 6.5 13 19.5 26 32.5 39 45.5 52
Pref. div. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Equity earnings 6.5 13 19.5 26 32.5 39 45.5 52
EPS 0.41 0.81 1.22 1.63 2.03 2.44 2.84 3.25
(Rs lakh)
EBIT 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Interest 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15
PBT -5 5 15 25 35 45 55 65
PAT -5 3.25 9.75 16.25 22.75 29.25 35.75 42.25
Pref. div. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Equity earnings -5 3.25 9.75 16.25 22.75 29.25 35.75 42.25
EPS (Rs) -0.42 0.27 0.81 1.35 1.90 2.44 2.98 3.52
(Rs lakh)
EBIT 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Interest 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PBT 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
PAT 6.5 13 19.5 26 32.5 39 45.5 52
Pref. div. 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11
Equity earnings -4.5 2 8.5 15 21.5 28 34.5 41
EPS (Rs) -0.38 0.17 0.71 1.25 1.79 2.33 2.88 3.42
3
I. M. Pandey, Financial Management, 9th Edition, New Delhi: Vikas.
(Rs lakh)
EBIT 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Interest 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18
PBT -8 2 12 22 32 42 52 62
PAT -8 1.3 7.8 14.3 20.8 27.3 33.8 40.3
Pref. div. 8.8 8.8 8.8 8.8 8.8 8.8 8.8 8.8
Equity earnings -8 0 0 5.5 12 18.5 25 31.5
EPS (Rs) -1.00 0.00 0.00 0.69 1.50 2.31 3.13 3.94
* It is assumed that PAT, if positive, will be used to first pay dividend to preference shareholders.
(Rs
EBIT 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Interest 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30
PBT -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50
PAT -20 -10 0 6.5 13 19.5 26 32.5
Pref. div. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Equity earnings -20 -10 0 6.5 13 19.5 26 32.5
EPS (Rs) -2.50 -1.25 0.00 0.81 1.63 2.44 3.25 4.06
(Rs lakh)
EBIT 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Interest 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30
PBT -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50
PAT -20 -10 0 6.5 13 19.5 26 32.5
Pref. dividend 8.8 8.8 8.8 8.8 8.8 8.8 8.8 8.8
Equity earnings -20 -10 0 0 4.2 10.7 17.2 23.7
EPS -4.17 -2.08 0.00 0.00 0.88 2.23 3.58 4.94
* It is assumed that PAT, if positive, will be used to first pay dividend to preference shareholders.
4
Ch. 14: Financial and Operating Leverage
EBIT-EPS Chart
6.00
4.00
2.00
0.00
EPS (Rs)
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
-2.00 Plan I: EPS
Plan II: EPS
-4.00 Plan III: EPS
Plan IV: EPS
-6.00 Plan V: EPS
Plan VI: EPS
-8.00
EBIT (Rs lakh)
Problem 4
(Rs ‘000)
Plan I Plan II
EBIT 150 150
Interest 35 80
PBT 115 70
Tax 40.25 24.5
PAT 74.75 45.5
Number of shares 15 12.5
EPS 4.98 3.64
5
I. M. Pandey, Financial Management, 9th Edition, New Delhi: Vikas.
Problem 5
(Rs)
Plan I Plan II Plan III
Equity 300,000 180,000 120,000
Debt 0 120,000 180,000
Total capital 300,000 300,000 300,000
Share issue price 20 20 20
Number of shares 15,000 9,000 6,000
Tax rate 35% 35% 35%
Interest calculation:
Plan I Plan II
Interest (%) Debt Interest Debt Interest amt.
14% 60,000 8400 60,000 8,400
16% 60,000 9600 90,000 14,400
18% 0 0 30,000 5,400
120,000 18,000 180,000 28,200
Problem 6
6
Ch. 14: Financial and Operating Leverage
Problem 7
EBIT 200
Contribution 400
Interest (INT) 100
Decline in sales -5%
Problem 8
A B
Expected EBIT 120,000 120,000
Standard deviation of 30,000 30,000
expected EBIT
Coefficient of variation 25% 25%
of expected EBIT
Interest 0 30,000
Expected PBT 120,000 90,000
Standard deviation of 30,000 30,000
expected PBT
Coefficient of variation 25% 33%
of expected PBT
B, with fixed interest charges, is more risky.
Since interest will remain constant irrespective of what happens to EBIT, the standard deviation of expected PBT will
be Rs 30,000. The business risk of the two firms is same. However, firm B has higher financial risk due to interest
charges.
Problem 9
(Rs)
Funds needed 1,000,000
Tax 35%
Existing shares 100,000
Plan I:
Debt 15% 1,000,000
Plan II: No. (Rs)
Equity 100,000 1,000,000
Total shares 200,000
7
I. M. Pandey, Financial Management, 9th Edition, New Delhi: Vikas.
Probabilit [{EBIT i -
EBIT i y (p i ) EBITp i E(EBIT)} 2 ]p i
100,000 0.05 5,000 845,000,000
150,000 0.10 15,000 640,000,000
200,000 0.30 60,000 270,000,000
250,000 0.40 100,000 160,000,000
300,000 0.10 30,000 490,000,000
400,000 0.05 20,000 1,445,000,000
Variance 230,000 3,850,000,000
Standard dev. 62,048
Coeff. Variation 27%
Plan I
E(EPS)} 2
EBIT i Interest PAT EPS i EPS i p i ]p i
100,000 150,000 -32,500 -0.33 -0.0163 0.0357
150,000 150,000 0 0.00 0.0000 0.0270
200,000 150,000 32,500 0.33 0.0975 0.0114
250,000 150,000 65,000 0.65 0.2600 0.0068
300,000 150,000 97,500 0.98 0.0975 0.0207
400,000 150,000 162,500 1.63 0.0813 0.0611
Variance 0.5200 0.1627
Standard dev. 0.4033
Coeff. Variation 77.56%
Plan II
{[EPS -
E(EPS)} 2
EBIT i Interest PAT EPS i EPS i p i ]p i
100,000 0 65,000 0.33 0.0163 0.0089
150,000 0 97,500 0.49 0.0488 0.0068
200,000 0 130,000 0.65 0.1950 0.0029
250,000 0 162,500 0.81 0.3250 0.0017
300,000 0 195,000 0.98 0.0975 0.0052
400,000 0 260,000 1.30 0.0650 0.0153
Variance 0.7475 0.0407
Standard dev. 0.2017
Coeff. Variation 27%
Plan I is more risky as it has higher standard deviation.
8
Ch. 14: Financial and Operating Leverage
Problem 10
Company 1 Company 2
10% fall in 10% rise in 10% fall in 10% rise
Current sales sales Current sales sales in sales
Sales 108.65 97.79 119.52 108.65 97.79 119.52
Less : variable cost 43.46 39.12 47.81 35.85 32.27 39.44
Contribution 65.19 58.67 71.71 72.80 65.52 80.08
Less: fixed cost 52.69 52.69 52.69 61.40 61.40 61.40
EBIT 12.50 5.98 19.02 11.40 4.12 18.68
Less : interest 9.27 9.27 9.27 6.95 6.95 6.95
PBT 3.23 -3.29 9.75 4.45 -2.83 11.73
Less : tax at 35% 1.13 -1.15 3.41 1.56 -0.99 4.11
PAT* 2.10 -2.14 6.34 2.89 -1.84 7.62
Total assets 92.70 92.70 92.70 92.70 92.70 92.70
Equity 30.90 30.90 30.90 46.35 46.35 46.35
Debt 61.80 61.80 61.80 46.35 46.35 46.35
Problem 11
(Rs crore)
Existing situation: Expansion:
Sales 137.5 Expansion in capacity 30%
PAT 7.15 Additional fixed assets 30
Tax rate 35% Additional sales 55
PBIT: PAT/(1 - T) 11 New sales 192.5
Fixed assets 100 PBIT/sales ratio 18%
Net worth 135 Additional PBIT 9.9
Number of shares 4 New PBIT 20.9
EPS 1.79 Total cost: sales - PBIT 171.6
Fixed cost/total cost 70%
Fixed cost 120.12
Variable cost 51.48
9
I. M. Pandey, Financial Management, 9th Edition, New Delhi: Vikas.
Analysis:
Sales 192.5 192.5
Less: variable cost 51.48 51.48
Contribution 141.02 141.02
Less: fixed cost 120.12 120.12
PBIT 20.9 20.9
Less: interest 4.5 0
PBT 16.4 20.9
Tax 5.74 7.32
PAT 10.66 13.59
Number of shares 4 7
EPS (Rs): PAT/N 2.67 1.94
Break-even PBIT:
[Ne/(Ne - Nd)] x INT 10.5 10.5
Break-even EPS (Rs) 0.98 0.98
Contribution ratio 73.26% 73.26%
Break-even point 163.97 163.97
Margin of safety 17.40% 17.40%
DOL: Contribution/PBIT 6.75 6.75
DFL: PBIT/PBT 1.27 1.00
DCL 8.60 6.75
Debt financing will generate more EPS provided PBIT is higher than Rs 10.5 crore (break-even PBIT). Thus debt
financing will remain attractive even if expected PBIT drops by about 50%. PBIT will drop if sales decline.1% decline
in sales will cause PBIT to drop by 6.75% (operating leverage). About 7.5% drop in sales will cause 50% drop in
PBIT. A 15% drop in sales will entirely wipe out PBIT. Debt adds financial risk, and thus increases EPS variability.
Problem 12
Volga
Net worth 153.31
Borrowing 165.47
EBIT 43.17
Interest (INT) 34.39
Fixed cost (FC) 118.23
10
Ch. 14: Financial and Operating Leverage
CASE
The objective of the case is to analyse the interaction between operating risk and financial risk. It also focuses on the
practical considerations of managers in understanding the operating conditions and risks that have a bearing on a firm's
borrowing decision (capital structure). From the facts of the case, one can argue that a low debt-equity ratio might
prove to be risky for a firm with high operating risk. The instructor can focus on break-even analysis and EPS analysis
to illustrate the concepts of and interaction between operating and financial risks. The instructor can close the case by
pointing out the inadequacy of this analysis, and set the background for the need for analysing the impact of capital
structure on the value of the firm.
(1) The break-even analysis indicates the safety zone (vis-à-vis sales variability) for the firm.
It helps to understand the operating risk faced by the firm.
Sales 4,032.3
PBIT 125.0 2.14 -3.88
Total cost 3,907.3
Variable cost 45% 1,758.3
Fixed cost 55% 2,149.0
Variable cost
ratio 43.6%
Contribution
ratio 56.4%
B/E sales 3,810.6 94.5%
11
I. M. Pandey, Financial Management, 9th Edition, New Delhi: Vikas.
PBIT-EPS Chart
50
40
30
20
EPS
10
0
-140
140
280
420
560
700
840
980
1,120
1,260
1,400
1,540
-10
-20
PBIT
Financial analysis: The company sales have grown at an average rate of 7.5%. But it shows great variability as well.
Twice during last decade sales growth was negative, a drop of 5.7% in 1991 and 17.5% in 1997.Margin has hovered
around 2%. The company has high level of current assets. If the company realises its debtor and uses surplus cash
balance, it can perhaps reduce its dependence on external funds. The firm is very conservatively financed.
12