Foundations - Theory and Design: Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur
Foundations - Theory and Design: Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur
Foundations - Theory and Design: Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur
11
Foundations - Theory
and Design
Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur
Lesson
29
Design of Foundations
Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur
Instructional Objectives:
At the end of this lesson, the student should be able to:
• understand and apply the design considerations to satisfy the major and
other requirements of the design of foundations,
• design the plain concrete footings, isolated footings for square and
rectangular columns subjected to axial loads with or without the moments,
wall footings and combined footings, as per the stipulations of IS code.
11.29.1 Introduction
The two major and some other requirements of foundation structures are
explained in Lesson 28. Different types of shallow and deep foundations are
illustrated in that lesson. The design considerations and different codal provisions
of foundation structures are also explained. However, designs of all types of
foundations are beyond the scope of this course. Only shallow footings are taken
up for the design in this lesson. Several numerical problems are illustrated
applying the theoretical considerations discussed in Lesson 28. Problems are
solved explaining the different steps of the design.
Solution 1:
It is essential that the total factored loads must be transferred at the base
of column without any reinforcement. For that the bearing resistance should be
greater than the total factored load Pu.
(A1/A2)1/2 ≤ 2.0
(11.8)
≤ 0.9[{100(0.2944)/20} + 1]1/2
≤ 1.415
The plain concrete block 1250 x 1250 x 670 shall be provided with the
minimum reinforcement 0.12 per cent for temperature, shrinkage and tie action.
Total = 435.4375 kN
Problem 2:
Solution 2:
The critical section is at a distance of d/2 from the periphery of the column.
The factored shear force (Fig.11.29.2b, sec. 2222) = 0.333{(2600)2 – (400 +
d)2}(10)-3 = 1959.34 kN. Shear resistance is calculated with the shear strength =
ks τ c = ks(0.25) (fck)1/2; where ks = 0.5 + β c (cl. 31.6.3 of IS 456). Here β c = 1.0,
ks = 1.5 >/ 1; so ks = 1.0. This gives shear strength of concrete = 0.25 (fck)1/2 =
1.118 N/mm2. So, the shear resistance = (1.118) 4 (936)(536) = 2243.58 kN >
1959.34 kN. Hence, ok.
Moment of resistance of the footing = Rbd2 where R = 2.76 (Table 3.3 of Lesson
5).
Alternatively, we can use Table 2 of SP-16 to get the Ast as explained below:
However, one-way shear has been checked assuming p = 0.25%. So, use
p = 0.25%. Accordingly, Ast = 0.0025(2600)(536) = 3484 mm2.
Pu = 1500(1.5) = 2250 kN
Compressive bearing resistance = 0.45 fck(A1/A2)1/2. For the column face A1/A2 =
1 and for the other face A1/A2 > 2 but should be taken as 2. In any case, the
column face governs.
Problem 3:
Solution 3:
or d ≥ 590.24 mm.
Provide total depth of footing as 670 mm, so that the effective depth = 670 – 50 –
16 – 8 = 596 mm. (The total depth is, however, increased to 750 mm in Step 7.)
At the critical section 2222 (Figs.11.29.3a and b), the shear resistance =
4(400 + 596)(596)(0.25)(fck)1/2 = 2654.73 kN.
Total = 1714.32 kN
Since the three critical sections (.i.e., of bending moment, two-way shear
and one-way shear) are within a distance of 596 mm from the face of the column,
the full depth of the footing slab is provided up to a distance of 700 mm from the
face of the column. However, by providing slope the available section now is a
truncated rectangle giving some less area for the one-way shear. Accordingly,
the depth of the footing is increased from 670 mm to 750 mm. With a cover of 50
mm and bar diameter of 12 mm in both directions, the revised effective depth =
750 – 50 – 12 – 6 = 682 mm. Providing the minimum depth of 350 mm at the
edge, as shown in Figs.11.29.3a and b, we check the one-way shear again,
taking into account of the truncated rectangular cross-section at a distance of
682 mm from the face of the column.
= 1998800 mm2
The bending moment in step 5 is 694.8495 kNm at the face of the column.
With d = 682 mm now, we have
Table 2 of SP-16 gives, p is less than 0.15 per cent. Provide p = 0.15 per cent
due to the one-way shear. So, Ast = 0.15(3400)(682)/100 = 3478.2 mm2. Provide
31 bars of 12 mm (Ast = 3506 mm2), both ways. Effectively, the number of bars
has increased from 30 to 31 now.
Provide dowels for the excess (2100 – 1440) = 660 kN. The area of
dowels = 660(103)/(0.67)(415) = 2373.67 mm2. Minimum area of dowels =
0.5(400)(400)/100 = 800 mm2. Provide 12 dowels of 16 mm diameter (area =
2412 mm2).
Problem 4:
Design one isolated footing for a column 300 mm x 450 mm, having 20
bars of 20 mm diameter (Ast = 4021 mm2) of Problem 1 of sec.10.25.6 of Lesson
25 carrying Pu = 1620 kN and Mu = 170 kNm using M 25 and Fe 415. Assume
that the moment is reversible. The safe bearing capacity of the soil is 200 kN/m2
at a depth of 1 metre from ground level. Use M 25 and Fe 415 for the footing.
Solution 4:
For the economic proportion, let us keep equal projection beyond the face
of the column in the two directions. This gives
(L – 0.45)/2 = (B – 0.3)/2
or, B = L – 0.15
(2)
This gives,
At the critical section 2222 (Figs.11.29.4a and b), the shear resistance is
obtained cl.31.6.31 of IS 456, which gives τ c = (0.5 + 450/300)(0.25)(25)1/2 but
the multiplying factor (0.5 + 450/300) >/ 1.0. So, we have τ c = 0.25(25)1/2 = 1.25
N/mm2. Hence, the shear resistance = (1.25)(2){(300 + 600) + (450 + 600)}(600)
= 2925 kN.
Assuming the unit weights of concrete and soil as 25 kN/m3 and 18 kN/m3,
respectively, we have the bearing pressure for (i) Pu = 1620 kN, (ii) Mu = 170
kNm and (iii) self weight of footing and backfill soil.
(iii) Self weight of footing of depth 674 mm and soil of (1000 – 674) = 326 mm:
pressure = 0.674(25) + 0.326(18) = 22.718 kN/m2
Thus, the maximum and minimum pressures are = 210.53 + 22.718 ± 46.51 =
279.758 kN/m2 and 186.738 kN/m2 < 300 kN/m2. Hence, o.k.
Table 3 of SP-16 gives p = 0.1462 < 0.15 per cent as required for one-way
shear.
The average pressure on soil between the edge and centre of the footing
= (288.615 + 242.105)/2 = 265.36 kN/m2. The bending moment is determined
with this pressure as an approximation.
Since the column is having moment along with the axial force, some of the
bars are in tension. The transfer of tensile force is not possible through the
column-footing interface. So, the longitudinal bars of columns are to be extended
to the footing. The required development length of 20 mm bars =
0.87(415)/4(1.4)(1.6) = 805.92 mm. Length available = 600 mm < 805.92 mm.
The bars shall be given 90o bend and then shall be extended by 200 mm
horizontally to give a total length of 600 + 8(20) (bend value) + 200 = 960 mm >
805.92 mm (Figs.11.29.4 a and b).
Design a combined footing for two columns C1, 400 mm x 400 mm with 8
bars of 16 mm diameter carrying a service load of 800 kN and C2, 300 mm x 500
mm with 8 bars of 20 mm diameter carrying a service load of 1200 kN
(Figs.11.29.5a and b). The column C1 is flushed with the property line. The
columns are at 3.0 m c/c distance. The safe bearing capacity of soil is 200 kN/m2
at a depth of 1.5 m below the ground level. Use M 20 and Fe 415 for columns
and footing.
Assuming the weight of combined footing and backfill as 15 per cent of the
total loads of the columns, we have the required base area, considering qc = 200
kN/m2,
Assuming p = 0.15 per cent reinforcement in the footing slab, the shear strength
of M 20 concrete = 0.28 N/mm2. Hence, the shear strength of section 11 =
(3000)d(0.28)(10-3) kN. From the condition that shear strength ≥ shear force, we
have
The effective depth along 4.0 m is 650 + 16 = 666 mm. The critical section
for the two-way shear around column C2 is at a distance of 666/2 = 333 mm from
the face of the column and marked by 2222 line in Fig.11.29.5b. The two-way
punching shear force, considering the soil pressure = 750/3 = 250 kN/m2, is
As per cl.31.6.3.1 of IS 456, here ks = 0.5 + (500/300) but >/ 1.0; so, ks = 1.0.
Therefore, shear strength of concrete = 0.25(20)1/2 (2){(300 + 666) + (500 +
666)}(666) = 3174.92 kN > 1518.411 kN. Hence, o.k.
The effective depth of footing is 666 mm. The critical section is marked by
3333 in Fig.11.29.5b. The two-way punching shear = 1200 – (1.066)(0.733)(250)
= 1004.65 kN. The resistance to two-way shear = 0.25(20)1/2 (2){(1066 +
733)}(666) = 2679.1 kN > 1004.65 kN. Hence, o.k.
(ii) Due to weight of the footing: With a total depth of the footing = 724 mm, the
pressure = 0.724(25) = 18.1 kN/m2.
(iii) Due to backfill of 1500 – 724 = 776 mm, the pressure = 0.776(18) = 13.968
kN/m2.
The total pressure = 166.67 + 18.1 + 13.968 = 198.738 kN/m2 < 200 kN/m2.
Hence, o.k.
Figure 11.29.6c shows the maximum positive bending moment = 720 kNm
at a distance of 1.4 m from the column C1 (at point J). With effective depth d =
666 mm, we have
Hence, o.k.
Hence, o.k.
Figure 11.29.7 shows the two column strips under columns C1 and C2.
The width of the transverse beam is 0.75d from the face of column C1. The
effective depth is 666 – 6 – 8 = 652 mm, as the effective depth in the longitudinal
direction = 666 mm, bottom bar diameter in longitudinal direction = 12 mm and
assuming the bar diameter in the transverse direction as 16 mm. We have to
check the depth and reinforcement in the transverse direction considering one-
way shear and bending moment.
The factored load for this transverse strip = 1200/3 = 400 kN/m. The
section of the one-way shear in sec.44 (Fig.11.29.7) at a distance of d = 652 mm
from the face of column C1. The width of the transverse strip = 400 + 0.75(652) =
889 mm.
(B) Bending moment at the face of column C1 in the transverse strip under column
Table 2 of SP-16 gives p = 0.2608 < 0.43125. Hence, the area of steel as
determine for one-way shear consideration is to be provided. Provide 13 bars of
16 mm @ 70 mm c/c in the column strip of width 889 mm under the column C1.
Hence, o.k.
The factored load for this transverse strip = 1800/3 = 600 kN/m. The one-
way shear section is marked by sec.5.5 in Fig.11.29.7 at a distance of d = 652
mm from the face of the column C2.
= 418.8 kN
(B) Bending moment at the face of column C2 in the transverse strip under column C2
Table 2 of SP-16 gives: p = 0.2544 < 0.404 per cent as required for one-way
shear. So, provide 20 bars of 16 mm diameter @ 75 mm c/c in the column strip
of width 1478 under column C2.
Hence, o.k.
The limiting bearing stress at the column face governs where the bearing
stress = 0.45fck = 9 N/mm2, since the column C1 is at the edge of the footing.
A2 = (300)(500) mm2
Therefore, the dowels shall be given a 90o bend and shall be extended
horizontally by 100 mm to have a total length of 632 + 8(20) + 100 = 892 mm >
752.2 mm (Figs.11.29.5a and b).
All the reinforcing bars and dowels are shown in Figs.11.29.5a and b.
A.1:
or d ≥ 1088.71 mm
Hence, o.k.
Hence, o.k.
Hence, o.k.
The critical section of the bending moment in the long direction is marked
by sec.4-4, (at the face of column) in Fig.11.29.9b. With factored soil pressure q
= 0.3 N/mm2, the bending moment is 0.3(3000)(2250)(2250)/2 = 2278.125 kNm.
which gives Ast = 6012.6245, i.e., p = 0.1837 per cent. However, we have to
provide 0.2 per cent, as required for the one-way shear. So, Ast =
0.2(3000)(1091)/100 = 6546 mm2. Provide 33 bars of 16 mm diameter (area =
6634 mm2, shown in Fig. 11.29.9c). The uniform spacing = (3000 – 50 – 16)/32 =
91.69 mm c/c, say @ 90 mm c/c. Alternatively,
Hence, o.k.
We get
This is a low value, which is not included in SP-16. So, provide 0.15 per cent to
have
However, we have to check for one-way shear as the p provided 0.15 per
cent is less than 0.2 per cent, required for the one-way shear and for which τ c =
0.28 N/mm2 (Table 19 of IS 456). The one-way shear force, as calculated in step
2(ii) is 388.5 kN. The resistance force of shear at this section = 0.28(5000)(1091)
= 1527.4 kN > 388.5 kN. Hence, o.k.
Further, the total area of steel 8182.5 mm2 has to be distributed in the
central band of width 3 m and two outer bands of width 0.75 m each as stipulated
in cl.34.3.1c of IS 456. The reinforcement in the central band is obtained as given
below:
Hence, o.k.
Factored load = 3000(1.5) = 4500 kN. From the limiting bearing stress at
the column-footing interface 0.45 fck(A1/A2)1/2, we have
(i) At the column face, where A1 = A2; bearing stress = 0.45 fck = 9.0 N/mm2
(ii) At the footing face, A1 = 15 m2 and A2 = (0.3)(0.5) = 0.15 m2. But, (A1/A2)1/2 >/ 2.
So, the bearing stress = 2(9) = 18 N/mm2.
Therefore, the column face governs. The force that can be transferred through
bearing = 9(500)(300) = 1350 kN. The excess force to be transferred by dowels =
4500 – 1350 = 3150 kN.
Clause 34.5.2 stipulates to provide @ 360 mm2 per metre length in each
direction on each force, when the thickness of footing slab is greater than one
metre. So, the minimum reinforcement is 8 mm bars @ 130 mm c/c (area = 387
mm2/m), wherever there is no other reinforcement.
A.2:
Given axial load = 200 kN/m and safe bearing capacity of soil qc = 100
2
kN/m at a depth of 1 m below the ground level. Assuming the self weight of
footing and backfill as 10 per cent, the area of the base required = 200(1.1)/100 =
2.2 m2. Provide width of 2.2 m for every one metre to get the required area of 2.2
m 2.
Assuming 0.15 per cent reinforcement in the footing slab, the shear
strength of M 20 τ c = 0.28 N/mm2. From the condition that the shear strength of
the section ≥ actual shear force in sec.11, we have:
0.28(1000)d ≥ (0.13636)(1000)(900 – d)
The critical section for the bending moment is marked marked as sec.2-2
in Fig.11.29.10, where the bending moment (factored) is,
11.29.4 References
1. Reinforced Concrete Limit State Design, 6th Edition, by Ashok K. Jain,
Nem Chand & Bros, Roorkee, 2002.
2. Limit State Design of Reinforced Concrete, 2nd Edition, by P.C.Varghese,
Prentice-Hall of India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, 2002.
3. Advanced Reinforced Concrete Design, by P.C.Varghese, Prentice-Hall of
India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, 2001.
4. Reinforced Concrete Design, 2nd Edition, by S.Unnikrishna Pillai and
Devdas Menon, Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing Company Limited, New
Delhi, 2003.
5. Limit State Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures, by P.Dayaratnam,
Oxford & I.B.H. Publishing Company Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, 2004.
6. Reinforced Concrete Design, 1st Revised Edition, by S.N.Sinha, Tata
McGraw-Hill Publishing Company. New Delhi, 1990.
7. Reinforced Concrete, 6th Edition, by S.K.Mallick and A.P.Gupta, Oxford &
IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd. New Delhi, 1996.
8. Behaviour, Analysis & Design of Reinforced Concrete Structural Elements,
by I.C.Syal and R.K.Ummat, A.H.Wheeler & Co. Ltd., Allahabad, 1989.
9. Reinforced Concrete Structures, 3rd Edition, by I.C.Syal and A.K.Goel,
A.H.Wheeler & Co. Ltd., Allahabad, 1992.
10. Textbook of R.C.C, by G.S.Birdie and J.S.Birdie, Wiley Eastern Limited,
New Delhi, 1993.
11. Design of Concrete Structures, 13th Edition, by Arthur H. Nilson, David
Darwin and Charles W. Dolan, Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing Company
Limited, New Delhi, 2004.
12. Concrete Technology, by A.M.Neville and J.J.Brooks, ELBS with
Longman, 1994.
13. Properties of Concrete, 4th Edition, 1st Indian reprint, by A.M.Neville,
Longman, 2000.
14. Reinforced Concrete Designer’s Handbook, 10th Edition, by C.E.Reynolds
and J.C.Steedman, E & FN SPON, London, 1997.
15. Indian Standard Plain and Reinforced Concrete – Code of Practice (4th
Revision), IS 456: 2000, BIS, New Delhi.
16. Design Aids for Reinforced Concrete to IS: 456 – 1978, BIS, New
Reinforced Concrete Limit State Design, 5th Edition, by Ashok K. Jain,
Nem Chand & Bros, Roorkee, 1999.
A.TQ.1:
Assuming the weight of the footing and backfill as 15 per cent, the
required base area = 1620(1.15)/200(1.5) = 6.21 m2.
It is desirable that the cantilever projections in the two direction from the
respective column face should be equal. Accordingly, the footing is selected as
2.7 m x 2.64 m where the centre line of column is located at a distance of 105
mm left from the centre line of footing, as shown in Fig.11.29.11c. The
arrangement shows that the cantilever projections are equal (1200 mm).
Assuming 0.15 per cent reinforcement in the footing slab, Table 19 of IS 456
gives τ c = 0.29 for M 25 concrete. Accordingly, the resistance shear of the
section is 0.29(2700)d = 783d. From the condition that the resistance shear ≥
actual shear, we have
Hence, o.k.
= 0.87(415)(16)/4(1.4)(1.6) = 644.73 mm
Hence, o.k.
Hence, the section can carry this moment. Table 3 of SP-16 gives p = 0.16509
per cent. Accordingly,
Hence, o.k.
Since the column is having moment along with the axial force, some of the
bars are in tension. The transfer of tensile force is not possible through the
column-footing interface. So, the longitudinal bars of column are to extended to
the footing. The required development length of 20 mm bars =
0.87(415)/4(1.4)(1.6) = 805.92 mm. Length available = 531 mm < 805.92 mm.
The bars shall be given 90o bend and then shall be extended by 200 mm
horizontally to give a total length of 531 + 8(20) (bend value) + 200 = 891 mm >
805.92 mm.