Chapter 1 Economics
Chapter 1 Economics
Chapter 1 Economics
Chapter OutlLne
1.1 Defin ition ofEc onom ics
1.2 Meth odolo gy of Eono mics
1.2. 1 Meth odolo gy of Economic Laws
12.2 Meth odolo gy of Economic Theory
1.3 Scop e of Econ omic s
1.3.1 Micr o Econ omics (Elementary Theory of Price)
1.3 .2 Macr o Econ omic s (Th eory of Incom e an d Empl
oyme nt)
1. Deductive Me tho d
The deductive met hod or deductive logic
consists of arriving at a cert ain outc ome or
from some fun dam enta l trut hs, axioms, sup conclusion
pos ition s or basic assu mpt ions thro ugh a
logical reas onin g. Hen ce, we star t with the process of
general assu mpt ions and mak e pred icti ons
process oflogical ded ucti ons . If real facts thro ugh a
con firm the predictions, it is acce pted as eco
If not, it is either' amm end ed in view of acquired nom ic law.
facts or rejected altogether.
Given the assumptions, different economic
units are assumed to behave in a rati ona l man
this i;nethod. For instance, activities of the ner under
man are guided by the mot ive of self inte
this as absolute trut h, it is possible to predict rest . Taking
hum an behaviour, that the peo ple buy in the
mar ket and sell in the dearest market. Oth cheapest
er typical examples are the Ricardian theo
law of demand, the law of supply, the law of ry of rent, the
diminishing marginal utility, the law of dim
returns and so on. The deductive met hod is inishing
also called hypothetical, abstract, positive
met hod . It is 'hyp othe tica l' in the sense or a priori
that the assu mpt ions or axio ms (als o call
conditions) may not corr espo nd to actual ed causes or
facts, but so nea r to actual facts that they may
premises for reas ons ing and deriving con be used as
clusions. It is also 'abs trac t' as the pro blem
by removing all irrelevant facts. The process is simplified
of deductive met hod is kno wn as a priori reas
process involves ded ucti on of principles or oning.This
laws or doctrines by a prio r assu mpt ion of
beh avio ur on the part of the eco nom ic man an axiomatic
. Deductive met hod was exte nsiv ely use
and neo-classical eco nom ists such as Rica d by classical
rdo, Malthus, Senior, J.S.Mill, Cairness, Mar
and Pigou. It is pop ular even with the mod x, Marshal!
em economists, as it has several adv anta ges:
(i) Economics being a social science deals
with such hum an beh avio ur on whi ch ther
scope for actual experiments, as data are inad e is limited
equate or not available. Her e, ded ucti ve met
is useful, whi ch is simple and doe s not invo hod
lve muc h of coll ecti on of data . Fur ther , it
expensive and less tim e con sum ing. is less
(ii) Hhelps in laying dow n basic prin cipl
es of hum an beh avio ur.
(iii) S_everal forces act simultaneously on
the eco nom ic phe nom ena , mak ing it com
tive met hod analyses com plex eco nom ic plex . Ded uc-
. . phe nom ena and bri· ngs ex t
general1sat1ons. ac nes s t o eco nom ic ·
(iv) Forecasts and con clus ions based on
b d "bl this met hod are exa ct clea rc t d ·
een ma e poss1 e by the applica . .
tion of sop hist
, u an 1mpart1· a1. Th"1s has
duc tive met hod . icat ed mat he f l h
ma ica tee niqu es in t h e de-
(v) It is universally applicable as it is bas
ed on hum a11 b h ·
e av1our.
1.5
What is Economics All About?
me nt of vai '1 \
(
2. Inductive Me tho d t 't , I l \ ...
of
ls wit h the nor ma tive asp ect of the science, i.e., what ought to be as well as
Ind uct ive me tho d dea . Contrary to
tec hni que of a pra ctic al app roa ch to the problems of economic science
what is. It is a general. Un der this
lves reasoning from the particular to the
the deductive logic, inductive logic invo units und er
arding the behaviour of eco nom ic
collected reg
me tho d, em piri cal inf orm atio n is and
. The n gen era lisa tion s are arri ved at on the basis of extensive experience
diff ere nt con diti ons nd eco nom ic
The num ber of obs erv atio ns has to be large to establish valid and sou
obs erv atio n. ween eco nom ic vari-
this me tho d, we sta rt wit h fact and try to establish relationship bet
laws. In orical, concrete, ethical or
. Inductive method is also called hist
ables thr oug h a process ofin duc tion is the result
d. The adv oca tes of this me tho d believe that economy of every cou ntry
:\_; :'..:J e_aljstic me tho orical evolution and .
g evo luti on and the col lect ed facts can be varified thro ugh hist
',' ·.: ·of a' lon are ma de by separating tile
erim ent atio n. The y are the n clas sified, analysed and generalisations
, , exp ed at
lev ant fact s from the rest . For exa mple, suppose an experiment is perform
unnecessary and irre s are taken. If,
by diff ere nt per son s in whi ch larg e num ber of hard and green ban ana
various places e, a law can be-formu-
eati ng, the y are said to be unr ipe and the result is the same everywher
after ting a law is called induc-
s are unripe. This method of formula
lated, tha t al! har d and gre en ban ana
tive me tho d. tha t as the inc om e of a
Law is a fam ous exa mp le of ind uctive method. This law describes
Engel's es, while tha t on com -
inc rea ses , the pro por tion of its exp end itur e on necessities decreas
fam ily
s up. Par eta's law of inco me ineq ualities, Malthusian theory ofpopulation are
forts and lux urie s goe they realy are.
les. Ind uct ive me tho d is clai med to be realistic as it describes things as
oth er examp
It has ma ny advantages: in economic investiga-
es clear and substantical advantage
(i) Exp erim ent al ind uct ion possess tio11 lead to
rese arc h. The eco nom ic law s whi ch are arrived at by a process ofinduc
tion and the applica;tion of
, exa ct and me asu rab le con clus ions. The results obtained thro ugh
pre cise validity onl y und er
ity. It tells tha t generalisation have
ind uct ive me tho d are closer to real ible to
ons , in a cer tain plac e and at a par ticu lar time. It is alm ost imposs
cer tain con diti uctive me tho d.
con clu sio ns wh ich hav e uni ver sal application, as don e und er ded
der ive of economic
d of sati stic al ind uct ion , thu s, give s pro per atte ntio n to the complexity
Me tho
phe nom ena . avi our pat tern of the
ict reality, as it is based on actual beh
(ii) Thi s me tho d is exp ect ed to dep irical
ts. Tha t is why , ma ny bus ines s firm s use this me tho d and und erta ke emp
economic uni
1.6 Economics_ I
investigation to determine expected resp
onse of consumers to cha nge s in quality
of thei r pro duc ts or to the way the goods and price
are advertised. Kno wle dge of responses
ous sections of society like consumers, prod of vari-
ucers, investors, farmers, etc., helps the
men t in formulating suitable policies to gov ern-
achieve thei r goals.
(iii) It gives due exphasis to'the historical evolution
of various eco nom ic c~~cepts and ideas.
economics, som e imp orta nt laws have been In
discovered from an emp mca l stud y of facts
,
(iv) Inductive met hod can be used to check and vari
fy the con clus ions of ded ucti on to bring
light deficiencies in their trea tme nt and to
to amplify their conclusions.
(v) This met hod involves less chances
of mistakes.
In spite of the above stat ed advantages,
inductive met hod is no free from limitatio
laws based upo n inductive met hod may ~s. Economic
not remain valid in future, as thes e exp
flowing from changes in economic caus lain the effects
es only. But, economic activities are also
economic causes whi ch also keep changing affe cted by non-
. Further, data one relies upo n may be
the prim ary data for nati ona l income com inaccurate,e.g.
putation in India. Complexity in collecti
of data also causes pers ona l prejudice. on and ~nalysis
Finally, this met hod is expensive and tim
can only be used by those who possess e-co nsu min g. It
skill and com pete nce to han dle com plex
data .
The deductive and indu ctiv e met hod s,
are not com plem enta ry to eac h other.
whe n ado pted in isolation will not give Any one of them,
reliable or satisfactory results. Tha t is
eco nom ists use bot h of these methods. why, modern
Economic hypothesis or laws are deri
process of logical ded ucti on. The se are ved thro ugh the
empirically tested and veri fied thro ugh
eco nom etri c' met hod s i.e., induction. Mar statistical or
shall rightly points out ," "Ind ucti on and ded
bot h nee ded for scientific thou ght as the ucti on are
righ t and left foot are bot h nee ded for
deductive met hod gives analytical or theo wal king :' While
retical explanation to eco nom ic facts of
inductive met hod tests or verifies the sam phe nom eno n,
e empirically. Inductive met hod helps in
assumptions for deductive method, the sele cting relevant
latter helps in inte rpre ting com plex real
way. While former involves reasoning from ity in a meaningful
the particular to the general, the latter imp
from general to the particular. In the fina lies movement
l analysis, bot h tend to con verg e toge
met hod s sho uld be judiciously com bine ther . Thu s, both
d to get correct, useful and full results.
Samuelsson are wor th noth ing, who nicely Her e, the words of
con clud es the who le mat ter by say ing
t1.
reason~n_g is th~ key success in the mas
t~ry of basic eco nom ic prin cipl es and shre
that "Logical
wd weighting
of emp mcal evidence 1s the key to succ
ess m mas tery of eco nom ic application
s."
1.2 .2 Me tho dol ogy of Economic The ory
Wh ene ve: we mak e an att~ mpt to exlain
a gro up of facts, we have a hypothesis2
can explam new facts and 1s not refuted . If this hypothesis
. . or con trad icte d by new di·scove · ·t
An eco nom ic theo ry 1s used to explain nes , 1 b eco mes a theor y.
'E · D •, obs erve d phe nom ena thro
conomIC ynam1c an d 'Postit.1ve . , ugh 'E
con om1 c a f1c' or
, · St
F,orm oifE · A z • A or Nor mat ive as disc usse d in Sec tion 3 3 3 4 · Ch t 3 on
. conom1c na ys1s. successful theo ry enables us to the p ed· t · d . , . hm ap er
of vari ous occ urre nce s. Eco nom ic theo r IC m a van ce t e consequenc
es
ry trie s to find out the ·
phe nom eno n and pos tula tes the rela tion imp orta nt cau ses of the eco nom ic ·
ship betw een the eco · h
nom1c p eno men a, but also give ·
I. In.recent years, statistics or econometrics
s
.• . or
mathematics is bein · .
2. A hypothes1S' 1s a statement about how two g mcreasmgly used as a tool of economic analy .
or more variabl sis.
es are re 1ate d to each other.
What is Economics All About?
l.7
explanations for them. It is a hypothesis that has been succe
ssfully tested.Economic theory is different
from an economic law in the sense that the latter simply descr
ibes the relationship betweeen variables
and does not provide any explanation for such relationsh
ip. Economic theory, on the other hand,
provides logical basis of the law. It derives the law through
a process oflogical reasoning and explains
the conditions under which the stated generalisation will
hold true. For example, theory of demand
tests then hypothesis that if the price of a good falls, then
the quantity demanded of the goods rises.
Economics, being a science of human behavior, uses the
same method as used in other sciences in
formulating a theory. It is systematic and logical enquiry abou
t an economic phenomenon. Following
Chart 1.1 explains the principle steps in the formulation
of an economic theory.
Chart 1.1
Defining the Problem and Various Tenns
Assumptions
A Process of Logical
Deductions and Predictions ·
Eithe r Or
\ Theory is Accepted J
2. Assumptions
After defining the prob lem and various con
cepts, a set of assu mpt ions are mad e. The se
may be behavioural, i.e., relating to the rele assumptions
vant eco nom ic units. For ex~m_p~e, the ~on
to maximise thei r satisfactions, while prod Sumers want
uce rs are inte rest ed in max1m1smg thei r
way, the beh avio r of bot h con sum ers and profits. In the
prod uce rs in ratio nal. Rat iona lity of con
producers is a crucial assumption in economi sum ers and
cs. Further, the assu mpt ions can also be tech
i.e., relating to the pro duc tion technology and nological,
factor end owm ents . Finally, som e assu mpt
mad e to simplify the analysis as the real eco ions are
nom ic phe nom eno n is very com plex .
3. Log ica l Ded uct ion
A process of logical ded ucti on is the nex
t step in the form ulat ion of an eco nom ic
discovers the imp lica tion of the assumptions theo ry whic;h
. These imp lica tion s are also call ed pred icti
theo ry. For example, if we assu me that man ons of the
is selfish, it can be logically ded ucte d and
that a seller will sell mor e if it brin gs mor pred icte d
e prof it to him .
4. Em piri cal Obs erv atio ns
A process of empirical observations involves
testing the predictions 'hyp othesis' aga inst
evidence or the actual facts. The aim is to judg the empirical
e whether the pred ictio ns are con sist ent with
facts _o f the world. For example, response of the real
con sum ers to rising pric es ove r a peri od can
to check the vali dity of the pred ictio n. be studied
S. Conclusion
If the predicti~ns are con siste nt with the facts,
the theory is esta blis hed and it gain s acce
the contrary, 1f the facts refute the pred ictio ptan ce. On
n, the theo ry is eith er mod ifie d or it is disc
favour of a bett er and mor e satisfactory alte arde d in
rnative theory.
1.3 SCOPE OF ECO NO MIC S
Trad
. 'bition•ally, the subj ect mat ter of eco nom ics
has bee n divi ded · t • n pro duc •
d 1stn ut1on, exchange and public finance. m o con sum ptio tion
· •f . . . The natu re ofh uma t d
th eir sat1s acti on are stud ied m con n wan s an t h e prm · c1p
• 'les
aov ernm• g'
sum ptio n. The pro duc tion of the
help of the various factors of prod ucti on is
considered und er rod u . goo ds an~ s~rv . t> •
the dist ribu tive shar e of these factors are 1ces with ~he
stud ied d d ~ . ctlo n. The pnn c1p
exchange of goods and thei r prices In pub t les governmg
. t· fi un er lS nbu tion . Exc han ge dea ls with
1.e., how gov ernm ent gets mon ey and · 1c man ce, we stud y the ec the
how ·t d h . f .
. .. . ono m1c unc tion s of a state,
t h ese activ1tJes are mcluded in price theo ry I spen s t e sam e In th d .
of supply covers prod ucti on. Similarly dist ·
WI11. th
1e eory of den • d. · e mo ern eco nom ics, all o f
ribtiti·o d h
an d pro d uct pricing resp ectively. , n an exc anglan e1
cov ers con sum ptio n, theo ry
t d"
<re s u 1ed und er fact or pric ing
The mod ern eco nom ic theo ry is however
' ·, d.1v1'd ecl .
t h eory) and mac ro-econ omi cs (inc mto two b h .
b h · ome theo ry) M' ~anc es-m icro -eco nom ics (price
M
e av1our. aero eco nomics, on the othe r hai ·d icro -eco nom1cs 15
M' . 1 ,
.
is 1 . · · the ana lysi·s of the indi vidu al
1cro -eco nom1cs an~ mac ro-e con omi cs are ti t 1e analysis of .
. . h . . mas s or agg rega te beh avio ur.
aggrega t 10n, 1.e., t e exte nt to which the eco 1us use d 111 co .
. . . . nne
economic analysis. . nom1c u111ts . d h ctio n wit h the leve l of the
an t e vari able s are cov ered in the
What is Economics All About? 1.9
When such situation of efficiency is reached, it is not possible to make any one better off without
making some other one worse off by any redistribution ofgoods, services or factors. The question
ofeconomic efficiency is the subject matter of welfare economics, which is an imp_o rtant branc~ of
micro-economic theory. The whole content of micro-economics is presented 10 the followmg
Chart 1.2:
Chart 1.2
Micro-Economic Theory
ed decision making in
A new branch of micro economics namely Business economics has improv
mming has provided
business through ~emand and cash analysis. Further, the theory oflinear progra
a powerful analytical tool to analyse business problems.
·1.3 ..2 Macr o Economics (Theo ry of Income and Empl oyme nt)
Most of the modern
The term macro is derived from the Greek word makros, which means large.
tion of Keynes 'General
economics is now macro-economics. It has become popular only after publica
ed, "the modern
Theory ofEmployment, Interest and Money' in 1936. K.Boulding has rightly remark
work ofJ.M.Keynes".
developments in macro economics ...... are most closely associated with the
forerunner of macro
Besides Keynes, Robert Malthus (a classical economist and an important
among the prominent
economics), Karl Marx, Leon Walras, Kunt Wicksell and Irving Fisher were
is. The theory of
economists who contributed to the development of the macro-economic analys
economic growth has further made its use indispensable.
s of the economy as a
Macro-economics, also called income theory is concerned with the analysi
e and output, total
whole and its large aggregates or averages such as total national incom
aggregates result from
employment, aggregate demand and supply, and general price level. These
such as consumers,
activities in different markets and from the behaviour of different decision makers
system or its major
governments and firms. Macro-economics studies the entire economic
private consumption
components such as households, business and government. It deals with total
diture, total imports
expenditure, total private investment expenditure, total government expen
loyment, inflation
and exports of goods as well as services. It seeks the causes and cures for unemp
and balance of payments deficits.
unit, but, with all such
Thus, macro-economics is not concerned with a particular decision making
. That is why, the
units combined together. It presents a complete picture of the economic system
E. Boulding7 "Macro-
macro-economics is termed as aggregative economics. In the words of Kenneth
quantities, not with
economics deals not with individual quantities but with aggregate of these
with price levels, not
individual incomes but with national income, not with individual prices but
with individual outputs but with the national output:'
It concerns the overall
Gardner Ackley8 says: "Macro-economics deals with economic affairs in large.
of trees which compose
. dimensions ofeconomic life .... It studies the character offorest, independently
it:'
oflevel, composition,
In a nutshell, macro-economics examines and explains the determination
i.e., national income,
fluctuations (cycles) and trends (growth) in the overall economic activity,
We merely study the
output and employment. Further, here, full employment is not assumed.
can be achieved.
determinants of the full employment and see how the fullest possible employment
1.3:
Various aspects of the macro-economic can be shown in the following Chart
Chart 1.3
Macro-Economk Theo~'
I
Theory of Theory of
I
Theory of Macro Theory
Income and General Price Economic of Distribution
Employment Level and Growth (Relative Shares of
Inflation Wages and Profits)
I
TheOI)' of Theory of
Consumption Investment
I
Theory of Fluctuations
(or Business Cycles)
POINTS TO REMEMBER