2 Eee Em-1
2 Eee Em-1
2 Eee Em-1
– Comprises
• Electric system
• Mechanical system
• Means whereby the electric and mechanical systems can interact
– Interactions can take place through any and allelectromagnetic and electrostatic
fields which are commonto both systems, and energy is transferred as a result of
thisinteraction.
– Both electrostatic and electromagnetic coupling fields mayexist simultaneously
and the system may have any numberof electric and mechanical subsystems.
If the losses of the coupling field are neglected, then the field is conservative and
Wf = We + Wm
Force and Torque Calculation from Energy and Co-Energy:
The amount of electrical energy that has been transferred into the magnetic field and converted
into the mechanical work during this time interval can be calculated by subtracting the power
loss dissipated in the winding resistance from the total power fed into the excitation winding as
From the above equation, we know that the energy stored in the magnetic field is a function of
the flux linkage of the excitation winding and the position of the plunger. Mathematically, we
can also write
From the knowledge of electromagnetics, the energy stored in a magnetic field can beexpressed
as
For a magnetically linear (with a constant permeability or a straight line magnetization curve
such that the inductance of the coil is independent of the excitation current) system, the above
expression becomes
In the diagram below, it is shown that the magnetic energy is equivalent to the area above the
magnetization or l-i curve. Mathematically, if we define the area underneath the magnetization
curve as the coenergy (which does not exist physically), i.e.
we can obtain
Therefore,
From the above diagram, the coenergy or the area underneath the magnetization curve can be
calculated by
Where
And
Hence
and
or
where
and
Because of the salient (not round) structure of the rotor, the self-inductance of the stator is a
function of the rotor position and the first term on the right hand side of the above torque
expression is nonzero for that dL11/dq¹0. Similarly, the second term on the right hand side of the
above torque express is nonzero because of the salient structure of the stator. Therefore, these
two terms are known as the reluctance torque component. The last term in the torque expression,
however, is only related to the relative position of the stator and rotor and is independent of the
shape of the stator and rotor poles.
1. Introduction:
Although a far greater percentage of the electrical machines in service are a.c. machines, the
D.C machines are of considerable industrial importance. The principal advantage of the d.c.
machine, particularly the d.c. motor, is that it provides a fine control of speed. Such an advantage
is not claimed by any a.c. motor. However, d.c. generators are not as common as they used to be,
because direct current, when required, is mainly obtained from an a.c. supply by the use of
rectifiers. Nevertheless, an understanding of d.c. generator is important because it represents a
logical introduction to the behaviour of d.c. motors. Indeed many d.c. motors in industry actually
operate as d.c. generators for a brief period. In this chapter, we shall deal with various aspects of
d.c. generators.
1.1 Generator Principle
An electric generator is a machine that converts mechanical energy into electrical energy.
An electric generator is based on the principle that whenever flux is cut by a conductor, an e.m.f.
is induced which will cause a current to flow if the conductor circuit is closed. The direction of
induced e.m.f. (and hence current) is given by Fleming‟s right hand rule. Therefore, the essential
components of a generator are:
(a) a magnetic field
(b) conductor or a group of conductors
(c) Motion of conductor w.r.t. magnetic field.
1.2 Simple Loop Generator
Consider a single turn loop ABCD rotating clockwise in a uniform magnetic field with a
constant speed as shown in Fig.(1.1). As the loop rotates, the flux linking the coil sides AB and
CD changes continuously. Hence the e.m.f. induced in these coil sides also changes but the e.m.f.
induced in one coil side adds to that induced in the other.
(i) When the loop is in position no. 1 [See Fig. 1.1], the generated e.m.f. is zero because
the coil sides (AB and CD) are cutting no flux but are moving parallel to it
(ii) When the loop is in position no. 2, the coil sides are moving at an angle to the flux and,
therefore, a low e.m.f. is generated as indicated by point 2 in Fig. (1.2).
(iii) When the loop is in position no. 3, the coil sides (AB and CD) are at right angle to the
flux and are, therefore, cutting the flux at a maximum rate. Hence at this instant, the
generated e.m.f. is maximum as indicated by point 3 in Fig. (1.2).
(iv) At position 4, the generated e.m.f. is less because the coil sides are cutting the flux at an
angle.
(v) At position 5, no magnetic lines are cut and hence induced e.m.f. is zero as indicated by
point 5 in Fig. (1.2).
(vi) At position 6, the coil sides move under a pole of opposite polarity and hence the
direction of generated e.m.f. is reversed. The maximum e.m.f. in this direction (i.e.,
reverse direction, See Fig. 1.2) will be when the loop is at position 7 and zero when at
position 1. This cycle repeats with each revolution of the coil.
Fig.(1.3) Fig.(1.4)Fig.(1.5)
Thus the alternating voltage generated in the loop will appear as direct voltage across the
brushes. The reader may note that e.m.f. generated in the armature winding of a d.c. generator is
alternating one. It is by the use of commutator that we convert the generated alternating e.m.f.
into direct voltage. The purpose of brushes is simply to lead (take) current from the rotating loop
or winding to the external stationary load.
The variation of voltage across the brushes with the angular displacement of the loop will
be as shown in Fig. (1.6). this is not a steady direct voltage but has a pulsating character. It is
because the voltage appearing across the brushes varies from zero to maximum value and back to
zero twice for each revolution of the loop. A pulsating direct voltage such as is produced by a
single loop is not suitable for many commercial uses. What we require is the steady direct
voltage. This can be achieved by using a large number of coils connected in series. The resulting
arrangement is known as armature winding.
Fig. (1.6)
1.4 Construction of d.c. Generator
The d.c. generators and d.c. motors have the same general construction. In fact, when the
machine is being assembled, the workmen usually do not know whether it is a d.c. generator or
motor. Any d.c. generator can be run as a d.c. motor and vice-versa. All d.c. machines have five
principal components viz., (i) field system (ii) armature core (iii) armature winding (iv)
commutator (v) brushes [See Fig. 1.7].
Fig. (1.7) Fig. (1.8)
(i) Field system
The function of the field system is to produce uniform magnetic field within which the
armature rotates. It consists of a number of salient poles (of course, even number) bolted to the
inside of circular frame (generally called yoke). The yoke is usually made of solid cast steel
whereas the pole pieces are composed of stacked laminations. Field coils are mounted on the
poles and carry the d.c. exciting current. The field coils are connected in such a way that adjacent
poles have opposite polarity.
The m.m.f. developed by the field coils produces a magnetic flux that passes through the
pole pieces, the air gap, the armature and the frame (See Fig. 1.8). Practical d.c. machines have
air gaps ranging from 0.5 mm to 1.5 mm. Since armature and field systems are composed of
materials that have high permeability, most of the m.m.f. of field coils is required to set up flux
in the air gap. By reducing the length of air gap, we can reduce the size of field coils (i.e. number
of turns).
(ii) Armature core
The armature core is keyed to the machine shaft and rotates between the field poles. It
consists of slotted soft-iron laminations (about 0.4 to 0.6 mm thick) that are stacked to form a
cylindrical core as shown in Fig (1.9). The laminations (See Fig. 1.10) are individually coated
with a thin insulating film so that they do not come in electrical contact with each other. The
purpose of laminating the core is to reduce the eddy current loss. The laminations are slotted to
accommodate and provide mechanical security to the armature winding and to give shorter air
gap for the flux to cross between the pole face and the armature “teeth”.
Fig. (1.9) Fig. (1.10)
(iv) Commutator
A commutator is a mechanical rectifier which converts the alternating voltage generated
in the armature winding into direct voltage across the brushes. The commutator is made of
copper segments insulated from each other by mica sheets and mounted on the shaft of the
machine (See Fig 1.11). The armature conductors are soldered to the commutator segments in a
suitable manner to give rise to the armature winding. Depending upon the manner in which the
armature conductors are connected to the commutator segments, there are two types of armature
winding in a d.c. machine viz., (a) lap winding (b) wave winding.Great care is taken in building
the commutator because any eccentricity will cause the brushes to bounce, producing
unacceptable sparking. The sparks may bum the brushes and overheat and carbonise the
commutator.
(V) Brushes
The purpose of brushes is to ensure electrical connections between the rotating commutator and
stationary external load circuit. The brushes are made of carbon and rest on the commutator. The
brush pressure is adjusted by means of adjustable springs (See Fig. 1.12). If the brush pressure is
very large, the friction produces heating of the commutator and the brushes. On the other hand, if
it is too weak, the imperfect contact with the commutator may produce sparking.
Fractional pitched coil. If the coil span or coil pitch is less than the pole pitch,then it is called
fractional pitched coil (See Fig. 1.20). In this case, the phase difference between the e.m.f.s in
the two coil sides will not be zero so that the e.m.f. of the coil will be less compared to full-
pitched coil. Fractional pitch winding requires less copper but if the pitch is too small, an
appreciable reduction in the generated e.m.f. results
Fig. (1.24)
(i) The back and front pitches are odd and are of opposite signs. They differ numerically by
2,
YB = YB = YF ± 2
YB =YF + 2 for progressive winding
YB =YF 2 for retrogressive winding
(ii) Both YB and YF should be nearly equal to pole pitch.
Since YB and YF both must be. about one pole pitch and differ numerically by 2,
Z
YB = P + 1
Z For progressive winding
𝑌𝐹 = P − 1
Z
YB = P − 1
Z For retrogressive winding
𝑌𝐹 = P + 1
It is clear that Z/P must be an even number to make the winding possible.
Developed diagram
Developed diagram is obtained by imagining the cylindrical surface of the armature to be
cut by an axial plane and then flattened out. Fig. (1.25) (i) shows the developed diagram of the
winding. Note that full lines represent the top coil sides (or conductors) and dotted lines
represent the bottom coil sides (or conductors).
The winding goes from commutator segment 1 by conductor 1 across the back to
conductor 12 and at the front to commutator segment 2, thus forming a coil. Then from
commutator segment 2, through conductors 3 and 14 back to commutator segment 3 and so on
till the winding returns to commutator segment 1 after using all the 40 conductors.
Position and number of brushes
We now turn to find the position and the number of brushes required. The brushes, like
field poles, remain fixed in space as the commutator and winding revolve. It is very important
that brushes are in correct position relative to the field poles. The arrowhead marked “rotation”
in Fig. (1.25) (i) shows the direction of motion of the conductors. By right-hand rule, the
direction of e.m.f. in each conductor will be as shown.In order to find the position of brushes, the
ring diagram shown in Fig. (1.25) (ii) is quite helpful. A positive brush will be placed on that
commutator segment where the currents in the coils are meeting to flow out of the segment. A
negative brush will be placed on that commutator segment where the currents in the coils are
meeting to flow in. Referring to Fig. (1.25) (i), there are four brushes two positive and two
negative. Therefore, we arrive at a very important conclusion that in a simplex lap winding, the
number of brushes is equal to the number of poles. If the brushes of the same polarity are
connected together, then all the armature conductors are connected in four parallel paths; each
path containing an equal number of conductors in series. This is illustrated in Fig. (1.26). Since
segments 6 and 16 are connected together through positive brushes and segments 11 and 1 are
connected together through negative brushes, there are four parallel paths, each containing 10
conductors in series. Therefore, in a simplex lap winding, the number of parallel paths is equal to
the number of pole
Fig. (1.25)
(i) (ii)
Fig.(1.26)
Conclusions
From the above discussion, the following conclusions can be drawn:
(i) The total number of brushes is equal to the number of poles.
(ii) The armature winding is divided into as many parallel paths as the number of poles. If
the total number of armature conductors is Z and P is the number of poles, then,
Number of conductors/path = Z/P
In the present case, there are 40 armature conductors and 4 poles. Therefore, the
armature winding has 4 parallel paths, each consisting of 10 conductors in series.
(iii) E.M.F. generated = E.M.F. per parallel path
= average e.m.f. per conductor ZP
(iv) Total armature current, Ia = P current per parallel path
(v) The armature resistance can be found as under:
Let l = length of each conductor; a = cross-sectional area
A = number of parallel paths = P (for simplex lap winding)
ρlZ
Resistance of whole winding, R a
ρlZ
Ra =
aA2
Various pitches
The various pitches in a wave winding are defined in a manner similar to lap winding.
(i) The distance measured in terms of armature conductors between the two sides of a coil
at the back of the armature is called back pitch YB (See Fig. 1.29). The YB must be an
odd integer so that a top conductor and a bottom conductor will be joined.
(ii) The distance measured in terms of
armature conductors between the
coil sides attached to any one
commutator segment is called front
pitch YB (See Fig. 1.29). The YB
must be
an odd integer so that a top conductor
and bottom conductor will be joined.Fig. (1.29))
(iii) Resultant pitch, YR = YB + YF(See Fig. 1.29)The resultant pitch must be an even integer
since YB and YF are odd. Further YR is approximately two pole pitches because YB as well as
YF is approximately one pole pitch.
(iv)
YB + YC
Average Pitch YA =
2
When one tour of armature has been completed, the winding should connect to the next
top conductor (progressive) or to the preceding top conductor (retrogressive). In either
case, the difference will be of 2 conductors or one slot. If P is the number of poles and Z
is the total number of armature conductors, then,
P YA Z 2
Z+2
YA =
P
If YC P/2 = NC, then the winding will close on itself in passing once around the armature. In
order to connect to the adjacent conductor and permit the winding to proceed,
𝑃
𝑌𝐶 ∗ = 𝑁𝐶 ± 1
2
2𝑁𝐶 ± 2 𝑁𝐶 ± 1 𝑁𝑜. 𝑜𝑓𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑚𝑢𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑠𝑒𝑔𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑠 ± 1
𝑌𝐶 = = =
𝑃 𝑃/2 𝑁𝑜. 𝑜𝑓𝑝𝑎𝑖𝑟𝑜𝑓𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑒𝑠
2𝑁𝐶 ±2 𝑍±2
𝑌𝐶 = = = 𝑌𝐴 (2𝑁𝐶 = 𝑍)
𝑃 𝑃
𝑌𝐵 + 𝑌𝐹
𝐶𝑜𝑚𝑚𝑢𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑝𝑖𝑡𝑐, 𝑌𝐶 = 𝑌𝐴 =
2
In a simplex wave winding YB, YF and YC may be equal. Note that YB, YF and YB are in terms of
armature conductors whereas YC is in terms of commutator segments.
𝑍±1
(ii) Average pitch, 𝑌𝐴 = (i)
𝑃
(iii) Both YB and YF are nearly equal to pole pitch and may be equal or differ by 2. If they
differ by 2, they are one more and one less than YA.
(iv) Commutator pitch is given by;
Number of commutator segments ±1
𝑌𝐶 = 𝑌𝐴 - Number of pair of poles
The plus sign for progressive winding and negative for retrogressive winding.
𝑍±2
(v) = 𝑌𝐴
𝑃
Since YA must be a whole number, there is a restriction on the value of Z. With Z = 180,
this winding is impossible for a 4-pole machine because YA is not a whole number.
(vi) Z P YA 2
𝑍 𝑃𝑌𝐴 + 2
𝑁𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟𝑜𝑓𝑐𝑜𝑖𝑙𝑠 = =
2 2
Developed diagram
Fig. (1.30) (i) shows the developed diagram for the winding. Note that full lines represent
the top coil sides (or conductors) and dotted lines represent the bottom coil sides (or conductors).
The two conductors which lie in the same slot are drawn nearer to each other than to those in the
other slot
i) (ii)
Fig.1.30
Referring to Fig. (1.30) (i), conductor 1 connects at the back to conductor 12(1 + 11)
which in turn connects at the front to conductor 23 (12 + 11) and so on round the armature until
the winding is complete. Note that the commutator pitch YC = 11 segments. This means that the
number of commutator segments spanned between the start end and finish end of any coil is 11
segments.
Fig. (1.31)
Conclusions
From the above discussion, the following conclusions can be drawn:
(i) Only two brushes are necessary but as many brushes as there are poles may be used.
(ii) The armature winding is divided into two parallel paths irrespective of the number of
poles. If the total number of armature conductors is Z and P is the number of poles, then,
Number of conductors/path Z/2
(iii) E.M.F. generated = E.M.F. per parallel path
= Average e.m.f. per conductor x
(iv) Total armature current, Ia = 2 current per parallel path
The armature can be wave-wound if YA or YC is a whole number
1.16 Dummy Coils
In a simplex wave winding, the average pitch YA (or commutator pitch YC) should be a
whole number. Sometimes the standard armature punchings available in the market have slots
that do not satisfy the above requirement so that more coils (usually only one more) are provided
than can be utilized. These extra coils are called dummy or dead coils. The dummy coil is
inserted into the slots in the same way as the others to make the armature dynamically balanced
but it is not a part of the armature winding.
Let us illustrate the use of dummy coils with a numerical example. Suppose the number of slots
is 22 and each slot contains 2 conductors. The number of poles is 4. For simplex wave wound
armature,
𝑌𝐴=𝑍±2 =2×22±2=44±2=11 1𝑜𝑟 10 1
𝑃 4 4 2 2
Since the results are not whole numbers, the number of coils (and hence segments) must be
reduced. If we make one coil dummy, we have 42 conductors and
𝑌𝐴=42 ±2 =11 𝑜𝑟 10
4
This means that armature can be wound only if we use 21 coils and 21 segments. The extra coil
or dummy coil is put in the slot. One end of this coil is taped and the other end connected to the
unused commutator segment (segment 22) for the sake of appearance. Since only 21 segments
are required, the two (21 and 22 segments) are connected together and considered as one.
1.17 Applications of Lap and Wave Windings
In multi polar machines, for a given number of poles (P) and armature conductors (Z), a
wave winding has a higher terminal voltage than a lap winding because it has more conductors in
series. On the other hand, the lap winding carries more current than a wave winding because it
has more parallel paths.
In small machines, the current-carrying capacity of the armature conductors is not critical
and in order to achieve suitable voltages, wave windings are used. On the other hand, in large
machines suitable voltages are easily obtained because of the availability of large number of
armature conductors and the current carrying capacity is more critical. Hence in large machines,
lap windings are used.
Note: In general, a high-current armature is lap-wound to provide a largenumber of parallel paths
and a low-current armature is wave-wound to provide a small number of parallel paths
1.18 Multiplex Windings
A simplex lap-wound armature has as many parallel paths as the number of poles. A
simplex wave-wound armature has two parallel paths irrespective of the number of poles. In case
of a 10-pole machine, using simplex windings, the designer is restricted to either two parallel
circuits (wave) or ten parallel circuits (lap). Sometimes it is desirable to increase the number of
parallel paths. For this purpose, multiplex windings are used. The sole purpose of multiplex
windings is to increase the number of parallel paths enabling the armature to carry a large total
current. The degree of multiplicity or plex determines the number of parallel paths in the
following manner:
(i) A lap winding has pole times the degree of plex parallel paths.
Thus a duplex lap winding has 2P parallel paths, triplex lap winding has 3P parallel paths
and so on. If an armature is changed from simplex lap to duplex lap without making any other
change, the number of parallel paths is doubledand each path has half as many coils. The
armature will then supply twice as much current at half the voltage
(ii) A wave winding has two times the degree of plex parallel paths. Number of
parallel paths, A = 2 plex
Note that the number of parallel paths in a multiplex wave winding depends upon the
degree of plex and not on the number of poles. Thus a duplex wave winding has 4 parallel paths,
triplex wave winding has 6 parallel paths and so on.
1.19 Function of Commutator and Brushes
The e.m.f. generated in the armature winding of a d.c. generator is alternating one. The
commutator and brushes cause the alternating e.m.f. of the armature conductors to produce a p.d.
always in the same direction between the terminals of the generator. In lap as well as wave
winding, it will be observed that currents In the coils to a brush are either all directed towards the
brush(positive brush) or all directed away from the brush (negative brush)
Further, the direction of current in coil reverses as it passes the brush. Thus when the coil
approaches the contact with the brush, the current through the coil is in one direction; when the
coil leaves the contact with the brush, the current has been reversed. This reversal of current in
the coil as the coil passes a brush is called commutation and fakes place while the coil is short-
circuited by the brush. These changes occur in every coil in turn. If, at the instant when the brush
breaks contact with the commutator segment connected to the coil undergoing commutation, the
current in the coil has not been reversed, the result will be sparking between the commutator
segments and the brush.
The criterion of good commutation is that it should be sparkless. In order to have
sparkless commutation, the brushes on the commutator should be placed at points known as
neutral point where no voltage exists between adjacent segments. The conductors connected to
these segments lie between the poles in position of zero magnetic flux which is termed as
magnetic neutral axis (M.N.A)
1.20 E.M.F. Equation of a D.C. Generator
We shall now derive an expression for the e.m.f. generated in a d.c. generator. Let =
flux/pole in Wb
A = number of parallel paths = 2 ... for wave winding = P ... for lap winding
d = P webers Time
taken to complete one revolution,
dt = 60/N second
∅𝑃𝑁
e.m.f/conductor =d/dt = 60
e.m.f. of generator,
Eg = e.m.f. per parallel path
(e.m.f/conductor) No. of conductors in series per parallel path
∅𝑃𝑁𝑍
𝐸𝑔 =
60𝐴
Armature current, Ia = IL
Terminal voltage, V = Eg IaRa Electric
power developed = EgIa
Power delivered to load = Eg Ia I2a R a IaEg Ia R a VIa
Fig. (1.33)
Fig. (1.34)
Fig. (1.35)
Short shunt
Series field current, Ise = IL
Shunt field current, Ish VIseRse
R
sh
Terminal voltage, V = Eg IaRa IseRse
Power developed in armature = EgIa
Power delivered to load = VIL
Long shunt
Series field current, Ise = Ia = IL + Ish
Shunt field current, Ish = V/Rsh
Terminal voltage, V = Eg Ia (Ra + Rse)
Power developed in armature = EgIa
Power delivered to load = VIL
1.25 Brush Contact Drop
It is the voltage drop over the brush contact resistance when current flows. Obviously,
its value will depend upon the amount of current flowing and the value of contact
resistance. This drop is generally small
1.26 Losses in a D.C. Machine
The losses in a d.c. machine (generator or motor) may be divided into three classes viz (i)
copper losses (ii) iron or core losses and (iii) mechanical losses. All these losses appear as
heat and thus raise the temperature of the machine. They also lower the efficiency of the
machine.
1. Copper losses
These losses occur due to currents in the various windings of the machine.
Note. There is also brush contact loss due to brush contact resistance (i.e.,resistance
between the surface of brush and surface of commutator). This loss is generally
included in armature copper loss.
2. Iron or Core losses
𝐸𝑑𝑑𝑦𝑐𝑢𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑙𝑜𝑠𝑠, 𝑃𝑒 = 𝐾𝑒 𝑓 2 𝑡 2 𝑉𝑊𝑎𝑡𝑡𝑠
Ke=Constant depending upon the electrical resistance of core and system of units
used
3. Mechanical losses
These losses are due to friction and windage.
(i) Friction loss e.g., bearing friction, brushes friction etc.
(ii) Windage loss i.e., air friction of rotating armature.
These losses depend upon the speed of the machine. But for a given speed, they are
practically constant.
Note. Iron losses and mechanical losses together are called stray losses.
1.27 Constant and Variable Losses
The losses in a d.c. generator (or d.c. motor) may be sub-divided into (i) constant losses (ii)
variable losses.
(i) Constant losses
Those losses in a d.c. generator which remain constant at all loads are known as constant losses.
The constant losses in a d.c. generator are:
(a) iron losses
(b) mechanical losses
(c) shunt field losses
(ii) Variable losses
Those losses in a d.c. generator which vary with load are called variable losses. The variable
losses in a d.c. generator are:
(a) Copper loss in armature winding ( I2a R a )
(b) Copper loss in series field winding ( Ise2 R se )
Total losses = Constant losses + Variable losses
Note. Field Cu loss is constant for shunt and compound generators.
Fig. (1.39)
𝐶 𝑉𝐼𝐿
η𝑒 = =
𝐵 𝐸𝑔 𝐼𝑎
𝐶 V IL
η𝑐 = =
𝐴 Mechanical power input
Clearly cme
Unless otherwise stated, commercial efficiency is always understood.
Now,
𝐶 output 𝑖𝑛𝑝𝑢𝑡 −𝑙𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑠
η𝑐 = = =
𝐴 input 𝑖𝑛𝑝𝑢𝑡
1.29 Condition for Maximum Efficiency
The efficiency of a d.c. generator is not constant but varies with load. Consider a shunt generator
delivering a load current IL at a terminal voltage V.
Generator output = V IL
The shunt field current Ish is generally small as compared to IL and therefore, it can be neglected.
Generator input = VIL I2L R a WC
𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑝𝑢𝑡 𝑉𝐼𝐿
𝜂= =
𝑖𝑛𝑝𝑢𝑡 𝑉𝐼𝐿 + 𝐼𝐿 2 𝑅𝑎 + 𝑊𝑐
1
= 𝐼𝐿 𝑅𝑎 𝑊
1+ + 𝑉𝐼𝑐
𝑉 𝐿
The efficiency will be maximum when the denominator of above Equation is minimum i.e.,
𝑑 𝐼𝐿 𝑅𝑎 𝑊𝑐
+ =0
𝑑𝐼𝐿 𝑉 𝑉𝐼𝐿
𝑅𝑎 𝑊𝑐
+ =0
𝑉 𝑉𝐼𝐿 2
𝑅𝑎 𝑊𝑐
𝑜𝑟 =
𝑉 𝑉𝐼𝐿 2
𝑜𝑟 𝐼𝐿 2 𝑅𝑎 = 𝑊𝑐
𝑊𝑐
𝐼𝐿 =
𝑅𝑎
Fig. 1.40
Hence, the efficiency of a d.c. generator will be maximum when the load current is such that
variable loss is equal to the constant loss. Fig (1.40) shows the variation of efficiency with load
current.
UNIT II
Performance of DC Machines
2.1 Principle of Operation:
DC motor operates on the principle that when a current carrying is placed in a magnetic
field, it experiences a mechanical force give n by F = BIL newton. Where „B‟ = flux density
in wb/𝑚2 ', „I‟ is the current and „L‟ is the length of the conductor. The direction of force can
be found by Fleming‟s left hand rule. Constructionally, there is no difference between a DC
generator and DC motor.
Figure 2.1
Figure 2.1 shows a multipolar DC motor. Armature conductors are carrying current downwards
under North Pole and upwards under South Pole. When the field coils are excited, with current
carrying armature conductors, a force is experienced by each armature conductor whose
direction can be found by Fleming‟s left hand rule. This is shown by arrows on top of the
conductors. The collective force produces a driving torque which sets the armature into rotation.
The function of a commutator in DC motor is to provide a continuous and unidirectional torque.
In DC generator the work done in overcoming the magnetic drag is converted into
electrical energy. Conversion of energy from electrical form to mechanical form by a DC motor
takes place by the work done in overcoming the opposition which is called the „back emf‟.
This emf is called as back emf𝐸𝑏 ‟The work done in overcoming this opposition is converted into
mechanical energy.
2.3 SIGNIFICANCE OF BACK EMF:
Figure 2.2 shows a DC shunt motor. The rotating armaturegenerating the back emf𝐸𝑏 ‟is like a
battery of emf𝐸𝑏 ‟connected across a supply voltage of „V‟ volts.
If 𝐸𝑏 is large, armature current will be less and vice versa. Hence 𝐸𝑏 acts like a governor i.e., it
makes the motor self- regulating so that it draws as much current as required by the motor.
Figure 2.2
2.5 CONDITION FOR MAXIMUM POWER:
2.6 TORQUE:
Torque is the twisting moment about an axis. It is measured by the product of the force and the
radius at which the force acts. Consider a pulley of radius „r‟ metre acted upon a circumferential
force of „F‟ newton which causes it to rotate at „N‟ rotations per second (r.p.s) as show in Figure.
2.3
Figure 2.3
2.6 (i) ARMATURE TORQUE OF A MOTOR:
2.6 (ii) SHAFT TORQUE (TSH):
Some of the torque developed in the armature will be lost in supplying the iron and
friction losses in the motor. The torque which is available for doing useful work is known as
shaft torque „Tsh‟. The horse power obtained by using the shaft torque is called as Brake Horse
Power (BHP).
SPEED OF A DC MOTOR:
Speed regulation: is defined as the change in speed from No-load to full load when the rated load
on the motor is reduced to zero, expressed as a percentage of rated speed.
Figure 2.7
The four essential characteristics of shunt motor i.e., torque, speed, current and efficiency
plotted as a function of horse power are known as performance curves of the motor, shown in
figure 2.7 Shunt motor has a definite No-load speed hence can be used where a load is suddenly
thrown off with field circuit remaining close. The drop in speed from No-load to full load is
small and hence referred to as constant speed motor. The efficiency curve is usually of the same
shape for all motors and generators. It is advantageous to have an efficiency curve which is fairly
flat and the maximum efficiency near to full load. Certain value of minimum current is required
even when the output is zero as the input under No-load condition has to meet the losses within
the machine.
The shunt motor is also capable of starting under heavy load condition but the current drawn by
the motor will be very high compared to DC series motor.
As the series motor draws only one and half times the full load current
At light loads,𝐼𝑎 nd hence is∅ small. But as 𝐼𝑎 increases; 𝑇𝑎 ncreases as the square of the current
up to saturation. After saturation∅ becomes constant, the characteristic becomes a straight line as
shown in Figure 2.8. Therefore a series motor develops a torque proportional to the square of the
armature current. This characteristic is suited where huge starting torque is required for
accelerating heavy masses.
Ex. Hoists, electric trains, etc.
This characteristic is shown in figure 2.9(a). Change in𝐸𝑏 for various load currents is small.
𝐸𝑏
Hence may be neglected. Therefore the speed is inversely proportional to flux, because N∝ ∅
When the load is heavy, 𝐼𝑎 is large and speed is low. When the load is low, current and hence flux
will be small. Therefore speed becomes dangerously high. Hence a series motor should never be
started without load on it.
2.10 PERFORMANCE CURVES OF DC SERIES MOTOR
The performance curves of DC series motor are shown in Figure 2.10. The machine is so
designed that it is having maximum efficiency near rated load.
For a given input current, the starting torque developed by a DC series motor is greater than that
developed by a shunt motor. Hence series motors are used where huge starting torques are
necessary. Ex. Cranes, hoists, electric traction etc. The DC series motor responds by decreasing
its speed for the increased in load. The current drawn by the DC series motor for the given
increase in load is lesser than DC shunt motor. The drop in speed with increased load is much
more prominent in series motor than that in a shunt motor. Hence series motor is not suitable for
applications requiring a constant speed.
2.11 COMPOUND MOTOR CHARACTERISTICS:
Cumulative compound motors are used where series characteristics are required and in
addition the load is likely to be removed totally such as in some types of coal cutting machines or
for driving heavy machine tools which have to take sudden deep cuts quite often. Speed will not
become excessively high due to shunt winding and the motor will be able to take heavy loads
because of series winding. Differential compound motors: Series field opposes the shunt field;
therefore the flux is decreased as the load is applied to the motor. This results in the motor speed
remaining almost constant or even increasing with increase in load.
Figure 2.11
Summarizing,
𝑁
1. Lies between shunt (∅ = constant) and series (∅ ∝ 𝐼𝑎 )characteristics as shown in figure
𝐼𝑎
2.11
Used in rolling mills where light and heavy loads are thrown on the motor
1.30 Armature Reaction and Commutation:
In a d.c. generator, the purpose of field winding is to produce magnetic field (called main
flux) whereas the purpose of armature winding is to carry armature current. Although the
armature winding is not provided for the purpose of producing a magnetic field, nevertheless the
current in the armature winding will also produce magnetic flux (called armature flux). The
armature flux distorts and weakens the main flux posing problems for the proper operation of the
d.c. generator. The action of armature flux on the main flux is called armature reaction.
it was hinted that current in the coil is reversed as the coil passes a brush. This
phenomenon is termed as commutation. The criterion for good commutation is that it should be
sparkles. In order to have sparkless commutation, the brushes should lie along magnetic neutral
axis. In this chapter, we shall discuss the various aspects of armature reaction and commutation
in a d.c. generator.
1.31 Armature Reaction
So far we have assumed that the only flux acting in a d.c. machine is that due to the main
poles called main flux. However, current flowing through armature conductors also creates a
magnetic flux (called armature flux) that distorts and weakens the flux coming from the poles.
This distortion and field weakening takes place in both generators and motors. The action of
armature flux on the main flux is known as armature reaction.
The phenomenon of armature reaction in a d.c. generator is shown in Fig. (1.41). Only
one pole is shown for clarity. When the generator is on no-load, a smal1 current flowing in the
armature does not appreciably affect the main flux 1 coming from the pole [See Fig 1.41 (i)].
When the generator is loaded, the current flowing through armature conductors sets up flux 1.
Fig. (1.41) (ii) shows flux due to armature current alone. By superimposing 1 and 2, we obtain
the resulting flux 3 as shown in Fig. (1.41) (iii). Referring to Fig (1.41) (iii),
it is clear that flux density at; the trailing pole tip (point B) is increased while at theleading pole
tip (point A) it is decreased. This unequal field distribution produces the following two effects:
(a) The main flux is distorted.
(b) Due to higher flux density at pole tip B, saturation sets in. Consequently, the increase in
flux at pole tip B is less than the decrease in flux under pole tip A. Flux 3 at full load is,
therefore, less than flux 1 at no load. As we shall see, the weakening of flux due to
armature reaction depends upon the position of brushes
(c) The demagnetizing effect of armature mmf reduces the total flux per pole. The reduction
in about 1 to 5% from no load to full load.
Fig. (1.41)
Fig. (1.42)
(i) The magnetic neutral axis (M. N. A.) is the axis drawn perpendicular to the mean
direction of the flux passing through the centre of the armature. Clearly, no e.m.f. is
produced in the armature conductors along this axis because then they cut no flux. With
no current in the armature conductors, the M.N.A. coincides with G, N. A. as shown in
Fig. (1.42).
(ii) In order to achieve sparkless commutation, the brushes must lie along M.N.A.
(b) The component Fc is at right angles to the m.m.f. OFm due to main poles. It distorts the
main field. For this reason, it is called the cross-magnetizing or distorting component of
armature reaction.
It may be noted that with the increase of armature current, both demagnetizing and distorting
effects will increase.
Conclusions
(i) With brushes located along G.N.A. (i.e., = 0°), there is no demagnetizing component of
armature reaction (Fd = 0). There is only distorting or cross-magnetizing effect of armature
reaction.
(ii) With the brushes shifted from G.N.A., armature reaction will have both demagnetizing and
distorting effects. Their relative magnitudes depend on the amount of shift. This shift is
directly proportional to the armature current.
(iii) The demagnetizing component of armature reaction weakens the main flux. On the other
hand, the distorting component of armature reaction distorts the main flux.
The demagnetizing effect leads to reduced generated voltage while cross-magnetizing effect
leads to sparking at the brushes.
(ii) The axis of magnetization of the remaining armature conductors lying between
angles AOD and COB is at right angles to the main flux as shown in Fig. (1.44) (ii).
These conductors produce the cross-magnetizing (or distorting) effect i.e., they
produce uneven flux distribution on each pole. Therefore, they are called cross-
magnetizing conductors and constitute the cross-magnetizing ampere-turns of
armature reaction.
1.35 Calculation of Demagnetizing Ampere-Turns Per Pole (ATd/Pole)
It is sometimes desirable to neutralize the demagnetizing ampere-turns of armature
reaction. This is achieved by adding extra ampere-turns to the main field winding. We
shall now calculate the demagnetizing ampere-turns per pole (ATd/pole).
4𝜃𝑚
Total number of armature conductors in angles AOC and BOD = ×𝑍
360
2𝜃𝑚
demagnetizing amp-turns per pair of poles = × 𝑍𝐼
360
𝜃
demagnetizing amp-turns/ poles == 360
𝑚
× 𝑍𝐼
i.e,
𝑚𝜃
𝐴𝑇𝑑 per pole =360 × 𝑍𝐼
𝑍 2𝜃𝑚 1 2𝜃𝑚
Cross-magnetizing conductors /pole = 𝑃 - Z × =Z −
360 𝑃 360
1 2𝜃𝑚
Cross-magnetizing ampere-conductors/pole= ZI −
𝑃 360
1 𝜃
Cross-magnetizing ampere-conductors/pole = ZI 𝑚
− 360
2𝑃
Note:
For neutralizing the demagnetizing effect of armature reaction, an extra number of turns may
be put on each pole
𝐴𝑇𝑑
No. of extra turns/pole = - for shunt generator
𝐼𝑠
𝐴𝑇𝑑
= - for series generator
𝐼𝑎
1. At the time of construction we use chamfered poles. These poles have larger air gap on
the tips and smaller air gap at the center. These poles provide non uniform air gap. The
effect of armature reaction is more near to edge of poles and negligible near the center of
poles.
2. If air gap is kept non uniform i.e., larger air gap at the edge (pole tip) and smaller near the
center of the pole and then armature flux near the pole tip decreases and armature
reaction decreases.
(i) By laminated pole shoe:
We insear laminated objects in the pole. By having laminated pole shoe the reluctance in the
armature flux path increases. Hence the armature flux gap gets reduced.
During the design of dc machine it should be ensured that the main field m.m.f. if
sufficiently in comparison with full load armature flux. Greater the main field, lesser will
be the distortion.
(iv) Inter Poles
(v) Compensating winding
These two methods are explained in below in detail.
Zc Ia ZaIAa
Za
or Zc =
A
The use of a compensating winding considerably increases the cost of a machine and is justified
only for machines intended for severe service e.g., for high speed and high voltage machines.
𝑍
No. of armature conductors/pole = 𝑝
Z
No. of armature turns/pole =
2P
Z Pole arc
No. of armature turns under pole face = 2P x Pole pitch
If I is the current through each armature conductor, then,
ZI Pole arc
AT/pole required for compensating winding = x
2P Pole pitch
Pole arc
= Armature AT/pole x Pole pitch
1.39 Commutation
Fig. (1.46) shows the schematic diagram of 2-pole lap-wound generator. There are two parallel
paths between the brushes. Therefore, each coil of the winding carries one half (Ia/2 in this case)
of the total current (Ia) entering or leaving the armature.
Note that the currents in the coils connected to a brush are either all towards the brush (positive
brush) or all directed away from the brush (negative brush). Therefore, current in a coil will
reverse as the coil passes a brush. This reversal of current as the coil passes & brush is called
commutation.
Fig. (1.46)
The reversal of current in a coil as the coil passes the brush axis is called commutation.
When commutation takes place, the coil undergoing commutation is short-circuited by the brush.
The brief period during which the coil remains short-circuited is known as commutation period
Tc. If the current reversal is completed by the end of commutation period, it is called ideal
commutation. If the current reversal is not completed by that time, then sparking occurs between
the brush and the commutator which results in progressive damage to both.
Fig. (1.47)
(i) In Fig. (1.47) (i), the brush is in contact with segment 1 of the commutator. The
commutator segment 1 conducts a current of 40 A to the brush; 20 A from coil A and 20 A
from the adjacent coil as shown. The coil A has yet to undergo commutation.
(ii) As the armature rotates, the brush will make contact with segment 2 and thus short-circuits
the coil A as shown in Fig. (1.47) (ii). There are now two parallel paths into the brush as
long as the short-circuit of coil A exists. Fig. (1.47) (ii) shows the instant when the brush is
one-fourth on segment 2 and three-fourth on segment 1. For this condition, the resistance
of the path through segment 2 is three times the resistance of the path through segment 1
(Q contact resistance varies inversely as the area of contact of brush with the segment). The
brush again conducts a current of 40 A; 30 A through segment 1 and 10 A through segment
2. Note that current in coil A (the coil undergoing commutation) is reduced from 20 A to
10 A.
(iii) Fig. (1.47) (iii) shows the instant when the brush is one-half on segment 2 and one-half on
segment 1. The brush again conducts 40 A; 20 A through segment 1 and 20 A through
segment 2 (Q now the resistances of the two parallel paths are equal). Note that now.
Current in coil A is zero.
(iv) Fig. (1.47) (iv) shows the instant when the brush is three-fourth on segment 2 and one-
fourth on segment 1. The brush conducts a current of 40 A; 30 A through segment 2 and 10
A through segment 1. Note that current in coil A is 10 A but in the reverse direction to that
before the start of commutation. The reader may see the action of the commutator in
reversing the current in a coil as the coil passes the brush axis.
(v) Fig. (1.47) (v) shows the instant when the brush is in contact only with segment 2. The
brush again conducts 40 A; 20 A from coil A and 20 A from the adjacent coil to coil A.
Note that now current in coil A is 20 A but in the reverse direction. Thus the coil A has
undergone commutation. Each coil undergoes commutation in this way as it passes the
brush axis. Note that during commutation, the coil under consideration remains short-
circuited by the brush.
Fig. (1.48) shows the current-time graph for the coil A undergoing commutation. The horizontal
line AB represents a constant current of 20 A upto the beginning of commutation. From the
finish of commutation, it is represented by another horizontal line CD on the opposite side of the
zero
(vi) line and the same distance from it as AB i.e., the current has exactly reversed. The way
in which current changes from B to C depends upon the conditions under which the coil
undergoes commutation. If the current changes at a uniform rate (i.e., BC is a straight
line), then it is called ideal commutation as shown in Fig. (1.48). under such conditions,
no sparking will take place between the brush and the commutator.
The commutation period is very small, say of the order of 1/500 second.
Let the current in the coil undergoing commutation change from + I to I (amperes) during the
commutation. If L is the inductance of the coil, then reactance voltage is given by;
2𝐼
self induced or reactance voltage = L × 𝑇 (for linear commutation)
𝐶
2𝐼
=1.11 L × 𝑇 (for sinusoidal commutation)
𝐶
The sum of the two emf‟s one due to self flux of the coil and the other due to the mutual flux of
the neighboring coils is called reactance voltage.
The magnitude of reactance voltage is approximately proportional to the armature core length,
coil pitch of the winding and square of the number of turns per coil. Reactance voltage can be
minimized by using
(a) Small length of armature core by resorting to multipolar design
(b) Chorded – armature coils
(c) Smallest no of armature turns per coil.
1.41 Methods of Improving Commutation
Improving commutation means to make current reversal in the short-circuited coil as sparkles as
possible. The following are the two principal methods of improving commutation:
(i) Resistance commutation
(ii) E.M.F. commutation
We shall discuss each method in turn.
1.42 Resistance Commutation
The reversal of current in a coil (i.e., commutation) takes place while the coil is short-circuited
by the brush. Therefore, there are two parallel paths for the current as long as the short circuit
exists. If the contact resistance between the brush and the commutator is made large, then current
would divide in the inverse ratio of contact resistances (as for any two resistances in parallel).
This is the key point in improving commutation.
This is achieved by using carbon brushes (instead of Cu brushes) which have high contact
resistance. This method of improving commutation is called resistance commutation.
Figs. (1.51) and (1.52) illustrates how high contact resistance of carbon brush improves
commutation (i.e., reversal of current) in coil A. In Fig. (1.51) (i), the brush is entirely on
segment 1 and, therefore, the current in coil A is 20 A. The coil A is yet to undergo
commutation. As the armature rotates, the brush short-circuits the coil A and there are two
parallel paths for the current into the brush. Fig. (1.51) (ii) shows the instant when the brush is
one-fourth on segment 2 and three-fourth on segment 1.
Figs. (1.51) and (1.52) illustrates how high contact resistance of carbon brush improves
commutation (i.e., reversal of current) in coil A. In Fig. (1.51) (i), the brush is entirely on
segment 1 and, therefore, the current in coil A is 20 A. The coil A is yet to undergo
commutation. As the armature rotates, the brush short-circuits the coil A and there are two
parallel paths for the current into the brush. Fig. (1.51) (ii) shows the instant when the brush is
one-fourth on segment 2 and three-fourth on segment 1.
The equivalent electric circuit is shown in Fig. (1.51) (iii) where R1 and R2 represent the brush
contact resistances on segments 1 and 2. A resistor is not shown for coil A since it is assumed
that the coil resistance is negligible as compared to the brush contact resistance. The values of
current in the parallel paths of the equivalent circuit are determined by the respective resistances
of the paths. For the condition shown in Fig. (1.51) (ii), resistor R2 has three times the resistance
of resistor R1.
Therefore, the current distribution in the paths will be as shown. Note that current in coil
A is reduced from 20 A to 10 A due to division of current in (he inverse ratio of contact
resistances. If the Cu brush is used (which has low contact resistance), R1 R2 and the current in
coil A would not have reduced to 10A.
Fig. (1.51)
Fig. (1.52)
As the carbon brush passes over the commutator, the contact area with segment 2 increases and
that with segment 1 decreases i.e., R2 decreases and R1 increases. Therefore, more and more
current passes to the brush through segment 2. This is illustrated in Figs. (1.52) (i) and (1.52) (ii),
When the break between the brush and the segment 1 finally occurs [See Fig. 1.52 (iii)], the
current in the coil is reversed and commutation is achieved.
It may be noted that the main cause of sparking during commutation is the production of
reactance voltage and carbon brushes cannot prevent it. Nevertheless, the carbon brushes do help
in improving commutation. The other minor advantages of carbon brushes are:
(i) The carbon lubricates and polishes the commutator.
(ii) If sparking occurs, it damages the commutator less than with copper brushes and the
damage to the brush itself is of little importance.
In this resistance commutation carbon brushes are used for small d.c machines. And
electrographite brushes wre used more frequently in all d.c machines. And copper brushes are
used in low voltage (upto 30V) heavy current d.c machines. In this all three brushes are self
lubricating.
1.43 E.M.F. Commutation
Fig. (1.55)
In addition to this, the m.m.f. of the commutating winding neutralizes the cross-
magnetizing ampere-turns in the space between the main poles. The compensating winding
neutralizes the cross-magnetizing effect of armature reaction under the pole faces.
Unit-III
Starting, Speed control and Testing of DC Machines
We know that the speed of shunt motor is given by: V-Irn=kφ where, Va is the voltage
applied across the armature and φ is the flux per pole and is proportional to the field current If.
As explained earlier, armature current Ia is decided by the mechanical load present on the shaft.
Therefore, by varying Va and If we can vary n. For fixed supply voltage and the motor connected
as shunt we can vary Va by controlling an external resistance connected in series with the
armature. If of course can be varied by controlling external field resistance Rf connected with the
field circuit. Thus for .shunt motor we have essentially two methods for controlling speed,
namely by:
1. varying armature resistance.
2. varying field resistance
i) Speed control by varying armature resistance
The inherent armature resistance ra being small, speed n versus armature current Ia
characteristic will be a straight line with a small negative slope as shown in figure1. In the
discussion to follow we shall not disturb the field current from its rated value. For shunt motor
voltage applied to the field and armature circuit are same and equal to the supply voltage V.
However, as the motor is loaded, Iara drop increases making speed a little less than the no load
speed n0. For a well designed shunt motor this drop in speed is small and about 3 to 5% with
respect to no load speed. This drop in speed from no load to full load condition expressed as a
percentage of no load speed is called the inherent speed regulation of the motor.
If we vary If, flux φ will change, hence speed will vary. To change If an external resistance is
connected in series with the field windings. The field coil produces rated flux when no external
resistance is connected and rated voltage is applied across field coil. It should be understood that
we can only decrease flux from its rated value by adding external resistance. Thus the speed of
the motor will rise as we decrease the field current and speed control above the base speed will
be achieved. Speed versus armature current characteristic is shown in figure 3.3 for two flux
values φ and 1φ. Since 1<φφ, the no load speed 'on for flux value 1φ is more than the no load
speed no corresponding to φ. However, this method will not be suitable for constant load torque.
To make this point clear, let us assume that the load torque is constant at rated value. So from the
initial steady condition, we have 1=L ratedea ratedT=TkIφ. If load torque remains constant and
flux is reduced to 1φ, new armature current in the steady state is obtained from 11aL ratekI=T φ.
Therefore new armature current is
But the fraction,1 1>φ; hence new armature current will be greater than the rated armature
current and the motor will be overloaded. This method therefore, will be suitable for a load
whose torque demand decreases with the rise in speed keeping the output power constant as
shown in figure 3.3 Obviously this method is based on flux weakening of the main field.
Therefore at higher speed main flux may become so weakened, that armature reaction effect will
be more pronounced causing problem in commutation.
Fig. 3.3 :N v/s Ia Characteristics
Some of the features of the Ward Leonard system are given below:
1. Absence of external resistance improves efficiency at all speeds and also when the generator
emf becomes less than the back emf of the motor, the electrical power flows back from motor to
generator, is converted to mechanical form and is returned to the mains via the driving AC
motor.
2. Motor starts up smoothly therefore No starting device is required.
3. Speed reversal is smoothly carried out.
4. Fine speed control from zero to rated value in both the direct
This method of speed control is used in
a. High speed elevators
b. Colliery winders
Advantages
1. Absence of external resistance improves efficiency at all speeds
2. Motor starts up smoothly. No starting device is required
3. Speed reversal is smoothly carried out.
The speed control of d.c. seriesmotors can be obtained by two methods (i) flux control method
(ii) armature-resistance control method. Armature-resistance control method method is mostly
used.
I. Flux control method:
In this method, the flux produced by the series motor is varied. The variation of flux can be
achieved in the following ways:
In this method, a variable resistance (called field diverter) is connected in parallel with series
field winding. A part of the line current passes through this diverter and thus weakens the field.
Since N ∝ 1/ϕ , speed also varies with field flux. The lowest speed obtained by this method is the
normal speed of motor when the current through diverter is zero, ie, diverter open circuited.
In this method, a variable resistance is directly connected in series with the supply. This reduces
the voltage available across the armature and hence the speed falls.
Fig.3.7 Armature-resistance Control
By changing the value of variable resistance, any speed below the normal speed can be obtained.
This is the most common method employed to control the speed of d.c. series motors.
To control the DC series motor this is another way called series parallel technique. This is the
method normally used in traction by connecting two or more than that of the series motor are
couple mechanically at the same load.
Whenever the series motors are connected in sequence (series) like shown in the figure, each and
every armature of the motor receive the one-half of the rated voltage. Thus the speed will be less.
If the series motors are connected in parallel, each and every armature of the motor receives the
full normal voltage and hence the speed is also high. Thus we can achieve the two speeds (low or
high) by connecting the motor either in series or parallel. Note for the same load on the pair of
motors, the speed of the system would run nearly 4 times once motors are in parallel as while
they are in series.
The starting of DC motor is somewhat different from the starting of all other types
ofelectrical motors. This difference is credited to the fact that a dc motorunlike other types of
motor has a very high starting current that has the potential of damaging the internal circuit of
the armature winding of dc motor if not restricted to some limited value. This limitation to the
starting currentof dc motor is brought about by means of the starter. Thus the distinguishing fact
about the starting methods of dc motor is that it is facilitated by means of a starter. Or rather a
device containing a variableresistance connected in series to the armature winding so as to limit
the starting current of dc motor to a desired optimum value taking into consideration the safety
aspect of the motor.
𝑉 = Eb + Ia R a
Where V is the supply voltage, Ia is the armature current, Ra is the armature resistance. And the
back emf is given by Eb. Now the back emf, in case of a dc motor, is very similar to the
generated emf of a dc generator as it‟s produced by the rotational motion of the current carrying
armature conductor in presence of the field. This back emf of dc motor is given by
∅ZNP
Eb =
60A
and has a major role to play in case of the starting of dc motor. From this equation we can see
that Eb is directly proportional to the speed N of the motor. Now since at starting N = 0, E b is
also zero, and under this circumstance the voltageequation is modified to
𝑉 = 0 + Ia R a
V
There fore Ia = R
a
For all practical practices to obtain optimum operation of the motor the armature resistance is
kept very small usually of the order of 0.5 Ω and the bare minimum supply voltage being 220
volts. Even under these circumstance the starting current, Ia is as high as 220/0.5 amp = 440 amp.
Such high starting current of dc motor creates two major problems.
1) Firstly, current of the order of 400 A has the potential of damaging the internal circuit of the
armature winding of dc motor at the very onset.
2) Secondly, since thetorque equation of dc motor is given by
V
There fore Ia = R
a
Very high electromagnetic starting torque of DC motor is produced by virtue of the high starting
current, which has the potential of producing huge centrifugal force capable of flying off the
rotor winding from the slots.
As a direct consequence of the two above mentioned facts i.e. high starting current and
high starting torque of DC motor, the entire motoring system can undergo total disarray and lead
towards into an engineering massacre and non-functionality. To prevent such an incidence from
occurring several starting methods of dc motor has been adopted. The main principal of this
being the addition of external electrical resistance Rext to the armature winding, so as to
increase the effective resistance to Ra + Rext, thus limiting the armature current to the rated
value. The new value of starting armature current is desirably low and is given by.
V
There fore Ia = R
a +R ext
Now as the motor continues to run and gather speed, the back emf successively develops and
increases, countering the supply voltage, resulting in the decrease of the net working voltage.
Thus now,
V−E b
There fore Ia =
R a +R ext
At this moment to maintain the armature current to its rated value, Rext is progressively
decreased unless it‟s made zero, when the back emf produced is at its maximum. This regulation
of the external electrical resistance in case of the starting of dc motor is facilitated by means of
the starter.
Starters can be of several types and requires a great deal of explanation and some
intricate level understanding. But on a brief over-view the main types of starters used in the
industry today can be illustrated as:-
1) 3 point starter.
2) 4 point starter.
Used for the starting of shunt wound DC motor and compound wound DC motor.
To start the motor the starter handle is moved from OFF position to run position
gradually against the tension of a hinged spring. An iron piece is attached to the starter handle
which is kept hold by the No-volt coil at Run position. The function of No volt coil is to get
deenergised and release the handle when there is failure or disconnection or a break in the field
circuit so that on restoration of supply, armature of the motor will not be connected across the
lines without starter resistance. If the motor is over loaded beyond a certain predetermined value,
then the electromagnet of overload release will exert a force enough to attract the lever which
short circuits the electromagnet of No volt coil. Short circuiting of No volt coil results in
deenergisation of it and hence the starter handle will be released and return to its off position due
to the tension of the spring. In this type of starter, the shunt field current has to flow back
through the starter resistance thus decreasing the shunt field current. This can be avoided by
placing a brass arc on which the handle moves as shown in Figure 3.10.
Figure 3.10
The supply to the field winding is derived through no voltage coil. So when field current
flows, the NVC is magnetized. Now when the handle is in the 'RUN' position, soft iron piece
connected to the handle and gets attracted by the magnetic force produced by NVC, because of
flow of current through it. The NVC is designed in such a way that it holds the handle in 'RUN'
position against the force of the spring as long as supply is given to the motor. Thus NVC holds
the handle in the 'RUN' position and hence also called hold on coil.
Now when there is any kind of supply failure, the current flow through NVC is affected
and it immediately losses its magnetic property and is unable to keep the soft iron piece on the
handle, attracted. At this point under the action of the spring force, the handle comes back to
OFF position, opening the circuit and thus switching off the motor. So due to the combination of
NVC and the spring, the starter handle always comes back to OFF position whenever there is any
supply problems. Thus it also acts as a protective device safeguarding the motor from any kind
of abnormality.
Working of over load coil of 3 Point Starter
If any fault occurs on motor or overload, it will draw extreme current from the source.
This current raise the ampere turns of OLR coil (over load relay) and pull the armature Coil, in
consequence short circuiting the NVR coil (No volt relay coil). The NVR coil gets demagnetized
and handle comes to the rest position under the influence of spring. Therefore the motor
disconnected from the supply automatically.
Figure 3.11 shows a four point starter. One important change is the No Volt Coil has been taken
out of the shunt field and has been connected directly across the line through a Protecting
resistance „R‟. When the arm touches stud one.
The current divides into three paths,
1. Through the starter resistance and the armature,
2. Through shunt field and the field rheostat and
3.Through No-volt Coil and the protecting resistance „R‟. With this arrangement, any change of
current in shunt field circuit does not affect the current passing though the NO-volt coil
because, the two circuits are independent of each other. Thus the starter handle will not be
released to its off position due to changes in the field current which may happen when the
field resistance is varied.
Construction and Operation of Four Point Starter
A 4 point starter as the name suggests has 4 main operational points, namely
1. 'L' Line terminal. (Connected to positive of supply.)
2. 'A' Armature terminal. (Connected to the armature winding.)
3. 'F' Field terminal. (Connected to the field winding.)
Like in the case of the 3 point starter, and in addition to it there is,
4. A 4th point N. (Connected to the No Voltage Coil)
The remarkable difference in case of a 4 point starter is that the No Voltage Coil is connected
independently across the supply through the fourth terminal called 'N' in addition to the 'L', 'F'
and 'A'. As a direct consequence of that, any change in the field supply current does not bring
about any difference in the performance of the NVC. Thus it must be ensured that no voltage coil
always produce a force which is strong enough to hold the handle in its 'RUN' position, against
force of the spring, under all the operational conditions. Such a current is adjusted through No
Voltage Coil with the help of fixed resistance R connected in series with the NVC using fourth
point 'N' as shown in the figure above.
Apart from this above mentioned fact, the 4 point and 3 point starters are similar in all other
ways like possessing is a variable resistance, integrated into number of sections as shown in the
figure above. The contact points of these sections are called studs and are shown separately as
OFF, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, RUN, over which the handle is free to be manoeuvred manually to regulate the
starting current with gathering speed.
Now to understand its way of operating let‟s have a closer look at the diagram given above.
Considering that supply is given and the handle is taken stud No.1, then the circuit is complete
and line current that starts flowing through the starter. In this situation we can see that the current
will be divided into 3 parts, flowing through 3 different points.
i) 1 part flows through the starting resistance (R1+ R2+ R3…..) and then to the armature.
ii) A 2nd part flowing through the field winding F.
iii) And a 3rd part flowing through the no voltage coil in series with the protective resistance R.
So the point to be noted here is that with this particular arrangement any change in the
shunt field circuit does not bring about any change in the no voltage coil as the two circuits are
independent of each other. This essentially means that the electromagnet pull subjected upon the
soft iron bar of the handle by the no voltage coil at all points of time should be high enough to
keep the handle at its RUN position, or rather prevent the spring force from restoring the handle
at its original OFF position, irrespective of how the field rheostat is adjusted.
This marks the operational difference between a 4 point starter and a 3 point starter. As
otherwise both are almost similar and are used for limiting the starting current to a shunt wound
DC motor or compound wound DC motor, and thus act as a protective device.
4.1 Losses and efficiency:
Motors convert electrical power (input power) into mechanical power (output power) while
generators convert mechanical power (input power) into electrical power (output power). Whole
of the input power cannot be converted into the output power in a practical machine due to
various losses that take place within the machine. Efficiency η being the ratio of outputpower to
input power is always less than 1 (or 100 %). Designer of course will try to make η as large as
possible. Order of efficiency of rotating d.c machine is about 80 % to 85 %. It is therefore
important to identify the losses which make efficiency poor.
Apart from the major losses as enumerated above there may be a small amount loss called stray
loss occur in a machine. Stray losses are difficult to account. Power flow diagram of a d.c motor
is shown in figure 4.1. A portion of the input power is consumed by the field circuit as field
copper loss. The remaining power is the power which goes to the armature; a portion of which is
lost as core loss in the armature core and armature copper loss. Remaining power is the
grossMechanical power developed of which a portion will be lost as friction and remaining
power will be the net mechanical power developed. Obviously efficiency of the motor will be
given by:
Similar power flow diagram of a d.c generator can be drawn to show various losses and input,
output power
Fig 4.2 Power Flow Diagram of a DC Generator
Now
Since speed of both the machines are same, it is reasonable to assume the rotational losses of
both the machines are equal; which is strictly not correct as the field current of the generator will
be a bit more than the field current of the motor, Thus,
Once Prot is estimated for each machine we can proceed to calculate the efficiency of the
machines as follows
This is because the order of field current may be 3 to 5% of the rated current. Except for very
lightly loaded motor, this assumption is reasonably fair. Therefore replacing Ia by If in the above
expression for efficiency mη, we get
Thus, we get a simplified expression for motor efficiency mη in terms of the variable current
(which depends on degree of loading) IL, current drawn from the supply. So to find out the
condition for maximum efficiency, we have to differentiate mη with respect to IL and set it to
zero as shown below
4.3 Testing of DC machines
capacity.
Figure 4.4
𝐼0 = No load current;
Ish = shunt field current
Iao = No load armature current = (Io - Ish)
V= Supply Voltage
No load input =VIo watts.
No load power input supplies
(i) Iron losses in the core
(ii) Friction and windings loss and
(iii) Armature copper loss.
Let I = load current at which efficiency is required
Ia = I – Ish if machine is motoring;
I + Ish if machine is generating
The biggest advantage of Swinburne's test is that the shunt machine is to be run as motor under
no load condition requiring little power to be drawn from the supply; based on the no load
reading, efficiency can be predicted for any load current. However, this test is not sufficient if we
want to know more about its performance (effect of armature reaction, temperature rise,
commutation etc.) when it is actually loaded. Obviously the solution is to load the machine by
connecting mechanical load directly on the shaft for motor or by connecting loading rheostat
across the terminals for generator operation. This although sounds simple but difficult to
implement in the laboratory for high rating machines (say above 20 kW), Thus the laboratory
must have proper supply to deliver such a large power corresponding to the rating of the
machine. Secondly, one should have loads to absorb this power.
ADVANTAGES
1. Economical, because no load input power is sufficient to perform the test
2. Efficiency can be pre-determined
3. As it is a no load test, it cannot be done on a dc series motor
DISADVANTAGES
1. Change in iron loss from no load to full load is not taken into account. (Because of armature
reaction, flux is distorted which increases iron losses).
2. Stray load loss cannot be determined by this test and hence efficiency is over estimated.
3. Temperature rise of the machine cannot be determined.
4. The test does not indicate whether commutation would be satisfactory when the machine is
loaded.
V= supply voltage
Motor input = V (𝐼1 + 𝐼2 )
Generator output = V𝐼1 ----------------- (a)
If we assume both machines have the same efficiency „𝜂‟, then,
Output of motor = 𝜂 x input = 𝜂 x V (𝐼1 + 𝐼2 ) = input to generator
Output of generator = 𝜂 x input = 𝜂 x 𝜂V (𝐼1 + 𝐼2 )) = 𝜂2 V (𝐼1 + 𝐼2 ) -----(b)
Equating (a) and (b),
ALTERNATIVE CONNECTION:
Figure 4.6
The Figure 4.6 shows an alternate circuit connection for this test. In this connection the shunt
field windings are directly connected across the lines. Hence the input current is excluding the
field currents. The efficiency is determined as follows:
ADVANTAGES:
i. The two machines are tested under loaded conditions so that stray load losses are
accounted
ii. Power required for the test is small as compared to the full load powers of the two
machines. Therefore economical for long duration tests like “Heat run tests”.
iii. Temperature rise and commutation qualities can be observed.
iv. By merely adjusting the field currents of the two machines the two machines can
beloaded easily and the load test can be conducted over the complete load range in a short
time.
DISADVANTAGES:
i. Availability of two identical machines
ii. Both machines are not loaded equally and this is crucial in smaller machines.
iii. There is no way of separating iron losses of the two machines which are different because of
different excitations.
iv. Since field currents are varied widely to get full load, the set speed will be greater than rated
values.
The efficiency can be determined as follows:
Figure 4.7
Figure 4.7 shows the circuit for fields test. This test is applicable to two similar series motor. One
of the machine runs as a motor and drives a generator whose output is wasted in a variable load
„R‟. Both machine field coils are in series and both run at same speed so that iron and friction
losses are made equal. Load resistance „R‟ is varied till the motor current reaches its full load
value.
V = Supply voltage
𝐼1 = Motor current
𝑉1 = Generator terminal voltage
𝐼2 = Load current
Input = V𝐼1 and output =𝑉2 𝐼2 .............................. 22
Ra and Rse = hot resistances.
Generator efficiency𝜂 of generator is of little use, because its field winding is separately excited
Generator output = V𝐼2
4.8 Retardation or running down test:
Figure 4.8
Figure 4.9
This method is applicable to shunt motors and generators and is used for finding the stray losses.
If armature and shunt copper losses are known for a given load, efficiency can be calculated. The
circuit is shown in figure 4.8.
Machine is speeded up slightly beyond its rated speed and then supply is cut off from
thearmature while keeping the field excited. Armature will slow down and its kinetic energy
isneeded to meet rotational losses. i.e., friction and windage losses.
(ii)
The voltmeter „V‟ in the circuit shown in Figure 4.8 is used as speed indicator by suitably
graduating it because E ∝ 𝑁. when the supply is cut off, the armature speed and hence voltmeter
reading falls. Voltage and time at different intervals are noted and a curve is drawn between the
time and speed as shown in Figure 4.9.In the Figure 4.9 AB - tangent drawn at P
(ii) Finding Moment of Inertial ‘I’: There are two methods of finding the moment of inertia
‘I’
(a) I is calculated:
(i) Slowing down curve with armature alone is calculated.
(ii) A fly wheel is keyed to the shaft and the curve is drawn again
(b) I is eliminated: In this method, time taken to slow down is noted with armature alone and
then a retarding torque is applied electrically i.e., a non inductive resistance is connected to the
armature.
Problems:
1. The Hopkinson‟s test on two similar shunt machines gave the following Full load data. Line
voltage = 110 V; Line current = 48 A; Motor armature current = 230 A; Field currents are 3
A and 3.5 A; Armature resistance of each machine is 0.035 W; brush drop of 1V/brush;
Calculate the efficiency of each machine.
Figure 4.10
SOLUTION:
Motor: Armature copper loss 1851.5 W
Brush contact loss = 230 X 2 = 460 W
Total armature copper loss = 1851.5 + 460 = 2312 W
Shunt field copper loss = 110 X 3 = 330 W
Total copper loss = 2312 + 330 = 2642 W
2. In a Hopkinson‟s test on a pair of 500 V, 100 kW shunt generator. The following data
was obtained:Auxiliary supply 30 A at 500 V; Generator output current 200 A; Field
current 3.5 A and 1.8 A; ra = 0.075 W for each machine; voltage drop at brushes = 2
V/machine; calculate the efficiency of the machine as a generator.
Figure 4.6
SOLUTION:
3. In a Hopkinson test on 250 V machine, the line current was 50 A and the motor current is
400 A not including the field currents of 6 and 5 A. the armature resistance of each
machine was 0.015W. Calculate the efficiency of each machine.
Figure 4.7
SOLUTION: