COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT

CENTER JALANDHAR

A TRAINING REPORT

SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE AWARD OF

THE DEGREE OF

BACHELOR OF TECHNOLOGY
(Mechanical Engineering)

SUBMITTED TO
LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY, JALANDHAR

SUBMITTED BY
Name of Student Reg No.
Rahul Soni 11011795

01-06-13 to 15-07-13
 TRAINING REPORT
ON
CATIA, UNDERTAKEN
AT
CADD CENTER, JALANDHAR

Under the guidance of: Mr. Zafar

Submitted By: Rahul Soni

Reg No.: 11011795

Department: Mechnical

Institute: LPU
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

I also wish to extend my thanks to Mr. Parminder sir and other feculties for guiding and providing the knowledge
related to machinery and processes.

I am extremely thankful to Mr. Zafar sir for valuable suggestions and encouragement .

I am also thankful to Mr. Minesh Sir Training and placement officer, LPU, Jallandhar for providing the opportunity
to get the knowledge.

Signature of Student
Rahul Soni
ABOUT TRAINING INSTITUTE

CADD Centre Training Services is the training arm of 25 year old CADD Centre Group, head
quartered at Chennai, India. it has a network of over 250 plus training centers in major cities and
towns across India, Sri-Lanka, Bangladesh, Malaysia, Singapore, Bahrain, Qatar, Oman, Nigeria,
Dubai, Sharjah, and Maldives. They provide industry relevant courses that are constantly updated
with industry inputs on CAD, CAE:Computer-aided engineering, Graphics and Project
Management. This organization provides CAD Training, CAD Software sales, full scale
monochrome and color scanners, A0 LED printers, document management and software
development. Till 2009 CADD Centre trained about 5,00,000 professionals from diverse
engineering, graphic and management backgrounds. Students are now employed in key positions
in large and small companies in more than 40 countries. They are preferred training partner for
more than 3500 corporate houses in India and abroad.

25 % of india’s electricity is generated by power plants using cadd centers technology.

70% components in automobiles has cadd center in it.

40% of indias cement is produced by using cadd center’s technology.

30% of indias steel is produced by using cadd centers technology.

There is a cadd center in 40% of indias landmark buildings.

Cadd center the trusted partner for enginnering and manufacturing for over 2 decades.

Founder

Established in the year 1988, at Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India by Mr. C.R.Vaitheeswaran,
Chairman & Managing Director (CMD)
 CONTENTS

 INTRODUCTION

1. Introduction to CATIA
2. History
3. Industry using CATIA
4. Comparison of Computer Aided Design software for
Engineering

 SOLID MODELING
1. About Solid Modeling
2. Constraints in solid modeling
3. Solid modeling vs. Surface modeling

 PROJECT DOCUMENTATION
DOUBLE BEARING ASSEMBLY

1. Drafting of different parts

2. Creating different parts
3. Assembling
BUTTERFLY VALVE ASSEMBLY
1. About Butterfly Valve
2. Structure
3. Types
4. Drafing of different parts
5. Creating different parts
6. Assembling
 INTODUCTION
Intoduction to CATIA V5R20
CATIA (Computer Aided Three-dimensional Interactive Application) is a multi-
platform CAD/CAM/CAE commercial software suite developed by the French
company Dassault Systemes and marketed worldwide by IBM. Written in the C++
programming language, CATIA is the cornerstone of the Dassault Systemes
product lifecycle management software suite. Through its exceptionally easy –to-
use state of the art user interface, CATIA delivers innovative technologies for
maximum productivity and creativity, from concept to the final product. CATIA
reduces yhe learning curve ,as it allows the flexibility of using feature-based and
parametric designs.

CATIA provides three basic platforms: P1, P2, P3. P1 is for small and medium sized process
oriented companies that wish to grow the large scale digitized product definition. P2 is for
advanced design engineering companies that require product, process and resources modeling.
P3 is for high end design application and it is basically for Automotive and Aerospace industry,
where high quality surfacing or Class-A surfacing is used for designing.

History :

CATIA started as an in-house development in 1977 by French aircraft manufacturer Avions

Marcel Dassault, at that time customer of the CADAM CAD software.

Initially named CATI (Conception Assistée Tridimensionnelle Interactive — French for

Interactive Aided Three-dimensional Design ) — it was renamed CATIA in 1981, when Dassault
created a subsidiary to develop and sell the software, and signed a non-exclusive distribution
agreement with IBM.[2]

In 1984, the Boeing Company chose CATIA as its main 3D CAD tool, becoming its largest
customer.
In 1988, CATIA version 3 was ported from mainframe computers to UNIX.

In 1990, General Dynamics Electric Boat Corp chose CATIA as its main 3D CAD tool, to design
the U.S. Navy's Virginia class submarine.

In 1992, CADAM was purchased from IBM and the next year CATIA CADAM V4 was
published. In 1996, it was ported from one to four Unix operating systems, including IBM AIX,
Silicon Graphics IRIX, Sun Microsystems SunOS and Hewlett-Packard HP-UX.

In 1998, an entirely rewritten version of CATIA, CATIA V5 was released, with support for
UNIX, Windows NT and Windows XP since 2001.

In 2008, Dassault announced and released CATIA V6. While the server can run on Microsoft
Windows, Linux or AIX, client support for any operating system other than Microsoft Windows
is dropped.

Industries using CATIA

CATIA is widely used throughout the engineering industry, especially in the

automotive and aerospace sectors.

Aerospace
The Boeing Company used CATIA V3 to develop its 777 airliner, and is currently using CATIA
V5 for the 787 series aircraft. They have employed the full range of Dassault Systemes' 3D PLM
products — CATIA, DELMIA, and ENOVIA LCA — supplemented by Boeing developed
applications.

Chinese Xian JH-7A is the first aircraft developed by CATIA V5, when the design was
completed on September 26, 2000.

European aerospace giant Airbus has been using CATIA since 2001.

Canadian aircraft maker Bombardier Aerospace has done all of its aircraft design on CATIA.

The Brazilian aircraft company, EMBRAER, use Catia V4 and V5 to build all airplanes.

Vought Aircraft Industries use CATIA V4 and V5 to produce its parts.

The British Helicopter company, Westlands, use CATIA V4 and V5 to produce all their aircraft.
Westlands is now part of an Italian company called Finmeccanica the joined company calls
themselves AgustaWestland.

The main supplier of helicopters to the U.S Military forces, Sikorsky Aircraft Corp., uses CATIA
as well.

Automotive
Many automotive companies use CATIA to varying degrees, including BMW, Porsche, Daimler
AG, Chrysler, Audi,[11] Volkswagen, Bentley Motors Limited, Volvo, Fiat, Benteler AG, PSA
Peugeot Citroën, Renault, Toyota, Ford, Scania, Hyundai, Škoda Auto, Tesla Motors, Proton,
Tata motors and Mahindra & Mahindra Limited, [[MLR motors, Hyderabad][International cars
& motors ltd(Sonalika group0,http://www.icml.co.in]. Goodyear uses it in making tires for
automotive and aerospace and also uses a customized CATIA for its design and development.
Many automotive companies use CATIA for car structures — door beams, IP supports, bumper
beams, roof rails, side rails, body components — because CATIA is very good in surface creation
and Computer representation of surfaces.

Shipbuilding
Dassault Systems has begun serving shipbuilders with CATIA V5 release 8, which includes
special features useful to shipbuilders. GD Electric Boat used CATIA to design the latest fast
attack submarine class for the United States Navy, the Virginia class. Northrop Grumman
Newport News also used CATIA to design the Gerald R. Ford class of supercarriers for the US
Navy.

Other
Architect Frank Gehry has used the software, through the C-Cubed Virtual Architecture
company, now Virtual Build Team, to design his award-winning curvilinear buildings. His
technology arm, Gehry Technologies, has been developing software based on CATIA V5 named
Digital Project. Digital Project has been used to design buildings and has successfully completed
a handful of projects.
Comparison of Computer Aided Design software for Engineering

Application 2D/3D or Runs on Support Support Support

and developer Specialty Windows for for for
fields ? Building Industry Drawing
Informatio Foundatio Exchang
n n e
Modelling Classes? Format?
?

Alibre Design 2D/3D + Yes Unknown Unknown Yes

by Alibre, Inc. Rendering

ArchiCAD by 2D/3D Yes Yes Yes Yes

Graphisoft Architectu
re

AutoCAD 2D/3D Yes Yes Yes Yes

2011 by AEC
Autodesk

Bricscad by 2D/3D Yes Yes Unknown Yes

Bricsys AEC

BRL-CAD by 3D design Yes Unknown No Yes

United States and
Army simulation
Research for
Laboratory military
vehicles

Caddie 2D/3D XP Vista Unknown Unknown Unknow

Professional CAE, & n
by Advanced Rendering Windows
Computer 7
Solutions
CATIA by 2D/3D Yes Yes Unknown Yes
Dassault CAE
Systèmes

Cobalt by 2D/3D XP Vista No No Yes

Ashlar-Vellum Rendering &
CAE Windows
CAM 7

Cobalt by 2D/3D Yes Unknown Unknown Yes

Ashlar-Vellum MCAD

DataCAD by 2D/3D Yes No No Yes

DATACAD MCAD
LLC

DDS-CAD 2D/3D Yes Yes Yes Yes

Architect & A/C
Construction
by DDS
Building
Innovation

Digital Project 2D/3D/4D 32bit and Yes Yes Unknow

by Gehry AEC 64bit n
Technologies

Application 2D/3D or Yes Unknown Unknown Yes

and developer Specialty
fields

FreeCAD by 3D Yes Unknown Unknown Unknow

Juergen Riegel n

freeCAD 3D Yes Unknown Unknown Yes

(Aik-Siong
Koh) by Aik-
Siong Koh

form•Z by 2D/3D XP, Vista Yes Unknown Yes

AutoDesSys, AEC 32bit and
Inc. Rendering 64bit

HiCAD by 3D/2D Yes Unknown Unknown Yes

ISD Group

IntelliCAD by 2D/3D Yes Yes Unknown Yes

IntelliCAD AEC
Technology
Consortium

Autodesk 3D Yes Unknown No Yes

Inventor by
Autodesk

MicroStation 2D/3D Yes Yes Yes Yes

by Bentley AEC
Systems

NX by 2D/3D Yes Unknown Unknown Yes

Siemens PLM
Software

Pro/ENGINEE 3D Yes Unknown Unknown Yes

R by
Parametric
Technology
Corporation

Progecad 2D/3D Yes No No Yes

(based on Rendering
IntelliCAD)
by progeSOFT

QCad 2D Yes No Unknown Yes

Community
Edition by
RibbonSoft

QCad Unknown Yes No No Yes

Professional
by RibbonSoft
Revit 2D/3D Yes Yes Yes Yes
Architecture BIM
by Autodesk

Revit 2D/3D Yes Yes Yes Yes

Structure by BIM
Autodesk

Revit MEP by 2D/3D Yes Yes Yes Yes

Autodesk BIM

Solid Edge by 3D/2D Yes Unknown No Yes

Siemens PLM
Software

Solidworks by 3D Yes Unknown Unknown Yes

SolidWorks
Corp.

Sweet Home 2D placing Yes Unknown Unknown Yes

3D by eTeks furniture
and 3D
preview

TurboCAD by 2D/3D Yes Unknown Unknown Yes

IMSI/Design,
LLC

VariCAD by 2D/3D Yes Unknown Unknown Yes

VariCAD

VectorWorks 2D/3D Yes Yes Yes Yes

by
Nemetschek

ZWCAD by 2D/3D Yes Unknown Unknown Yes

ZWCAD
Software Co.,
Ltd.
Solid Modeling

'Solid Modeling' is a method used to design parts by combining various 'solid objects' into a
single three-dimensional (3D) part design. Originally, solid modelers were based on solid objects
being formed by primitive shapes such as a cone, torus, cylinder, sphere, and so on. This evolved
into solid objects being created and formed from swept, lofted, rotated, and extruded 2D
wireframe or sketch geometry.

Because of their limited use, some solid modelers have abandoned the primitive shapes
altogether in favor of predefined library solid objects. 'Stock' library objects provide the designer
with a similar shape to begin the design with, eliminating some of the initial tedious design work.

T
h e

real power of a solid modeling application is how it can take the solid objects and combine them
together by intersecting, joining, or subtracting the objects from one another to create the desired
resulting shapes. Because everything in a solid model design is a 'watertight' model of the part,
the solid modeler is able to know the topology of the entire model. By topology we mean that it
knows what faces are adjacent to each other and which edges are tangent.

Since the
solid
modeler's database knows so much about the entire part model, it can perform functions virtually
impossible with surface modeling. For example you can fillet all the adjacent edges of a face to
other faces in a single command. Another popular example is the 'shell' function of solid
modelers. This allows you to define a constant wall thickness for the entire model with a simple
task with a single command

constraints in solid modeling

Most solid modelers support 'geometric constraints'. A geometric constraint is the relationship of
an entity to other entities. Constraints are only used on the underlying sketch or wireframe
entities that define the solid object bounaries. Some common 'constraints' for these entities are
coincident, collinear, intersect, parallel, perpendicular, and tangent. When one or more entities
are 'constrained' to each other, changing any of the entities will most likely have an effect on the
others. In the example , the lines and arcs have been assigned tangent constraints to each other
and two arc are mirror to each other . When one of the arcs in the solid's boundary sketch is
changed other one is also changed.

Some
solid

modelers automatically assign the constraints for you as you design the part. Others provide the
ability to assign constraints as you are designing. CATIA will automatically assign constraints
where it thinks you want them and then allow you to modify or remove them manually later.

In following example tangent constraint is automatically assign by CATIA

Single entity attributes such as 'horizontal' and vertical' are also considered to be constraints,
since tagging an entity with one of these attributes will keep the solid modeler from changing it
when other entities that have relationships to it are changed.

Constraints are one of the system basics needed to provide true geometric associativity. Most
solid modelers will allow you to add and modify constraints as needed. There are even some
solid modelers that will attempt to automatically assign the required geometric constraints
logically from the steps you take to design the part

Solid modeling vs. Surface modeling:

For designs that require any combination of fillets along multiple edges, contain drafted surfaces,
or constant wall thickness, solid modeling is far superior to surface modeling.

For designs that require sculptured surfaces with a lot of curvature (the mouse you are using on
you computer comes to mind) a surface modeler is far easier than a solid modeler. In fact it may
be virtually impossible to create some shapes with a solid modeler and hold exact dimensions for
very complex shapes.

Project Documentation
DOUBLE BEARING ASSEMBLY:
Consist of following components:

1. Base
2. Cap

3. Bolt

4. Bushing
Creating double bearing assembly :

Step 1: Creating different parts in parts in Part Design Workbench

Step 2: Assembling different part in Assembly Design Workbench

STEP 1:
Creating Base:
 Enter into CATIA by double clicking on the
icon.
 Select “start” > Mechanical design >Part
design to create new part
 Name this part as “base”.
 Click on XY plane and then on Sketch icon

 Following sketch is made .

 Exit to Sketcher on clicking exit sketch icon

 Padding is done by clicking on the “pad” icon.

 Mirror og the whole body was taken.

 Following step was taken as shown
in tree
 Following sketches are made to complete the base
as labeled in the tree expansion
  Final model of the base after applying material is shown below

Creating Cap :
 Following step
was taken as shown in tree expansion
 sketch 1
sketch 2
sketch 3
sketch 4

3D view of cap

Creating Bushing :
  Following step was taken as shown in tree expansion

sketch 1
sketch 2
3D view of bushing

Creating Bolt :
  Following step was taken as shown in tree expansion

sketch 1
• sketch 1 is made

padding of 4 mm

Edge fillet is applied having radius 1mm and made it

as body 1

sketch2
• Hexagonal sketch is made for bolt head as body 2

boolen operation
• intersect of two body

sketch 3
• sketch waas made and pading is done for the bolt length

3D view of bushing
STEP 2:
Different parts are assembled in following order :

 Base
 Bushing
 Cap
 Bolt

3D view and exploded views are shown below:

BUTTERFLY VALVE
ASSEMBLY:

A butterfly valve is a valve which can be used for isolating or regulating flow. The
closing mechanism takes the form of a disk. Operation is similar to that of a ball
valve, which allows for quick shut off. Butterfly valves are generally favored
because they are lower in cost to other valve designs as well as being lighter in
weight, meaning less support is required.
A butterfly valve is from a family of valves called quarter-turn valves. The
"butterfly" is a metal disc mounted on a rod. When the valve is closed, the disc is
turned so that it completely blocks off the passageway. When the valve is fully
open, the disc is rotated a quarter turn so that it allows an almost unrestricted
passage of the fluid. The valve may also be opened incrementally to throttle flow.

Structure
Butterfly valves are valves with a circular body and a rotary motion disk closure member which
is pivotally supported by its stem. A butterfly valve can appear in various styles, including
eccentric and high-performance valves. These are normally a type of valve that uses a flat plate
to control the flow of water. As well as this, butterfly valves are used on firefighting apparatus
and typically are used on larger lines, such as front and rear suction ports and tank to pump lines.
A butterfly valve is also a type of flow control device, used to make a fluid start or stop flowing
through a section of pipe. The valve is similar in operation to a ball valve. Rotating the handle
turns the plate either parallel or perpendicular to the flow of water, shutting off the flow.

Types
1. Resilient butterfly valve, having a flexible rubber seat. Working pressure 232 psi

2. High performance butterfly valve, usually double eccentric in design. Working pressure
up to 725 psi

3. Tricentric butterfly valve, usually with metal seat design. Working pressure up to 1450
psi

Butterfly valve consist of following components:

ITEM QTY NAME DESCRIPTION

1 1 BODY CAST IRON
2 2 ROUND HEAD MACHINE SCREW #4-4UNF X .250
3 1 PLATE ALUMINIUM
4 1 SHAFT STEEL
5 1 RETAINER STEEL
6 3 ROUND HEAD MACHINE SCREW #10-32UNF X .500
7 1 ARM STEEL
8 1 HEX ROUND NUT .375-24UNF

DRAFTING OF COMPONENTS:
1. BODY

2. A
R
M

3. SHAFT
4. RETAINER

5. PLATE
6. SCREW

7. NUT
Creating Butterfly Valve assembly :
Step 1: Creating different parts in parts in Part Design Workbench
Step 2: Assembling different part in Assembly Design Workbench

STEP 1:

Creating Body :

 3D view of body

Following step was taken as shown in tree expansion with help of following sketches
 sketch 1
• sketch 1 is made
• and padding is done

sketch 2
• sketch 2 is made and padding is done

tritangentfillet cmd is applied

sketch 3

sketch 4
sketch 4 is made padding is done

sketch 4

sketch 5

sketch6

sketch 7

Creating Arm:
  Following step was taken as shown in tree expansion with help of following sketches

sketch 1

sketch 2
3D view of Arm

Creating Shaft:
 Following step was taken as shown in tree expansion with help of following sketches

sketch1
sketch 2
sketch 3
sketch4
3D view of Shaft
Creating Plate:

 Following step was taken as shown in tree expansion with help of following sketches

3D view of Plate
Creating Retainer:

 Following step was taken as shown in tree expansion with help of following sketches
3D view of Plate

Creating Screw:
 Following step was taken as shown in tree expansion with help of following sketches

Creating Nut:
 Following step was taken as shown in tree expansion with help of following sketches
 Nut

STEP 2:
Different parts are assembled in
following order :

 Body
 Shaft
 Plate
 Screw
 Retainer
 Arm


3D view of butterfly Valve Assembly:

RESULT & DISCUSSION
CATIA has significantly improved our ability to complete the design to manufacture processes of
very advanced structures.