Duplex & Super Duplex Intermetallic Phases
Duplex & Super Duplex Intermetallic Phases
Duplex & Super Duplex Intermetallic Phases
Intermetallic Phases
Issue
Leaks occurred during construction/commissioning in Super Duplex Stainless Steel fittings
attributed to rapid seawater corrosion in sigmatised material. In addition, during early
operations, a pinhole leak occurred on the Duplex Stainless Steel manifold.
Manufacturers and particularly their heat treatment facilities were audited for appropriate
controls, procedures and awareness of potential problems. Project specifications included
charpy-v notch impact testing by heat lot to ensure toughness, thereby precluding sigma.
Proposed Cause
Improper heat treatment resulting in intermetallic phases.
An Additional Concern
While we submit our proposed cause of protracted, detrimental heat treatment, we do have
a concern regarding the specific technique used in this case for the welding of
Ferritic/Austenitic Stainless Steels. This is based on reports from several clients who have
had serious issues due to improper welding procedures, specifically for Super Duplex (25%
Chromium). So, while the welding is in our opinion not the cause of the problem, we do
recommend a review of the welding process and submit documentation that may be of
assistance in this review.
Material
UNS S31803 While 22% Cr does have the benefits of both the toughness of Austenitic
Stainless Steel and the higher strength and corrosion resistance of Ferrite Stainless Steel,
it is only considered superior to the standard austenitic alloys in this respect. We would not
suggest 22% Cr for seawater application.
UNS S31803
C Cr Mn Mo N Ni P S Si
0.030 max 21.0-23.0 2.00 max 2.50-3.50 0.08-0.20 4.50-6.50 0.030 max 0.020 max 1.00 max
UNS S32750 25% Cr however has the optimum pitting resistance and crevice corrosion in
the Duplex family and is commonly referred to as Super Duplex. As this material is better
for seawater applications, in our experience it performs well only in controlled temperatures
and begins to fail if exposed to large variations in temperature.
UNS S32750
C Cr Mn Mo N Ni P S Si
0.030 max 24.0-26.0 1.20 max 3.50-5.0 0.24-0.32 6.0-8.0 0.035 max 0.020 max 0.8 max
Successful Testing
In PM’s experience, the following testing has been successfully conducted in the combat
against the problems encountered:
100% Liquid Dye Penetrant required for all seamless fittings, flanges and hubs. 10%
per heat per purchased line item with a minimum of one, both externally and
internally where accessible.
Impact Testing:
22% Cr required at -40 C, results to meet Average of 3 Specimens 40J/Single
30JMin
25% Cr required at -20C, results to meet Average of 3 Specimens 45J/Single
32JMin
Micrographic Examination:
25% Cr Only: All items to be supplied with Micrographic Examination in acc to ASTM
E562, examined at 400x and shall be free from intermetallic phases and precipitates
Corrosion Test:
25% Cr Only: All items to be supplied with Corrosion Testing in acc to G48 Method A
@ 50°C, no pitting at 20x with weight loss less than 4.0g/m²
NORSOK Standard
NORSOK has a different standard for Duplex and Super Duplex as well as for each
form of material. Rather then listing each of the requirements, we attach each
standard.
Please note the requirements for Impact Testing, Micrographic Examination and
Liquid Dye Penetrant testing required for both 22% and 25% Cr. Corrosion Testing
also required for 25% Cr.
Kizomba Project
The most detailed specification PM successfully managed was for a valve
manufacturer who produced valves for the Kizomba project (ExxonMobil). The
project experienced similar issues with pit corrosion attributed to intermetallic
phases. It was determined that improper heat treatment caused deleterious sigma
phases in the material. The attached specifications for Duplex and Super Duplex
material were utilized on the project and the issue was resolved.
Testing Considerations
Engineering and Quality must come to an understanding as testing should not become so
stringent that it deteriorates the pricing and availability of a product. The more testing
required and the more in depth that testing becomes, the more difficult it is to source a
product. This especially applies to ASTM A923 compliance. Therefore, it is essential to
determine the least amount of testing that provides the maximum assurance of quality.