The Indian judicial system has a hierarchical structure with the Supreme Court at the top, followed by High Courts in each state and union territory, and subordinate courts at the district and local levels. The Supreme Court has original, appellate and advisory jurisdiction and acts as the final interpreter of the constitution. High Courts have appellate jurisdiction over lower courts and original jurisdiction in certain matters. Subordinate courts' jurisdiction is based on subject matter, territory and amount in dispute.
The Indian judicial system has a hierarchical structure with the Supreme Court at the top, followed by High Courts in each state and union territory, and subordinate courts at the district and local levels. The Supreme Court has original, appellate and advisory jurisdiction and acts as the final interpreter of the constitution. High Courts have appellate jurisdiction over lower courts and original jurisdiction in certain matters. Subordinate courts' jurisdiction is based on subject matter, territory and amount in dispute.
The Indian judicial system has a hierarchical structure with the Supreme Court at the top, followed by High Courts in each state and union territory, and subordinate courts at the district and local levels. The Supreme Court has original, appellate and advisory jurisdiction and acts as the final interpreter of the constitution. High Courts have appellate jurisdiction over lower courts and original jurisdiction in certain matters. Subordinate courts' jurisdiction is based on subject matter, territory and amount in dispute.
The Indian judicial system has a hierarchical structure with the Supreme Court at the top, followed by High Courts in each state and union territory, and subordinate courts at the district and local levels. The Supreme Court has original, appellate and advisory jurisdiction and acts as the final interpreter of the constitution. High Courts have appellate jurisdiction over lower courts and original jurisdiction in certain matters. Subordinate courts' jurisdiction is based on subject matter, territory and amount in dispute.
Diksha Sharma Judicial System in India • India has an integrated system of judiciary in view of a single Constitution. The judiciary in India acts as the custodian of the Indian Constitution and the protector of the Fundamental Rights. The Indian Judicial System is one of the oldest legal systems of the World. • The judicial system in India is integrated and pyramidal in structure with the Supreme Court at the top and the High Court and the other Subordinate Courts at the lower levels. • The adversarial litigation system is followed by the Indian Judicial System in which the impartial neutral party and both the sides present arguments before the Court of law. • The Common law system which is followed in England influenced the Indian Judicial System. The laws were developed by the judges through the judgements delivered by courts and these judgements were followed as precedents. • The specific feature of the Indian Judicial System is “judicial review”. The judicial review is the power given to the judiciary to determine the validity of law. • The Supreme Court with the judicial review through which it can declare any law as void when it is unconstitutional or in derogation with the Fundamental Rights. The power of judicial review is given to the High Courts also through which it can overrule the decisions of the lower courts. • The Constitution ensures the Independence of Judiciary which means that the other organs of the Government must not restrain the functioning of the judiciary in such a way that it would not be able to do justice. • Other organs of the Government should not interfere with its decision and judges must be able to perform their functions without fear or favour. The Constitution of India had granted rights to citizens to ensure equality and protects them from any partial judgment. The power to resolve disputes and to give judgments is based on the rules of law, is given to judiciary. Hierarchy of Indian Courts • The Indian Judiciary is the guardian of the Constitution of India. For a democracy like India to function effectively, it is imperative to have an impartial and independent judiciary. Considering the size of the country, the Indian judiciary is divided into several levels in order to decentralise and address matters at the grassroots levels. • The Indian Judiciary has a unified structure, the lowest and foremost court of law is the lower court, after which appeals can be made in the higher courts (High Court and Supreme Court). The jurisdiction of a particular court can be decided on 3 basis: Pecuniary, territorial, and Subject-matter. The following points denote the structure and Hierarchy of Courts in India. – Supreme Court (Highest Court of Appeal). – High Courts( Highest Court In States and UTs) – Lower/Subordinate courts in districts (District and Sessions Courts) • Subordinate Judges’ Court (Civil), Metropolitan Magistrate • Court of Sessions(Criminal) • Subordinate Magistrates’ Courts Hierarchy of Courts in India Supreme Court • The Supreme Court has original, exclusive, and appellate jurisdiction. • Article 32 of the Constitution gives an extensive original jurisdiction to the Supreme Court in regard to enforcement of Fundamental Rights. • Its exclusive original jurisdiction extends to any dispute between the Government of India and one or more States or between the Government of India and any State or States on one side and one or more States on the other or between two or more States, if and insofar as the dispute involves any question (whether of law or of fact) on which the existence or extent of a legal right depends.[Article 131] • The appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court can be invoked by a certificate granted by the High Court in respect of any judgment, decree or final order of a High Court in both civil and criminal cases, involving substantial questions of law or as to the interpretation of the Constitution. High Courts of India • The High Courts are the highest courts of appellate jurisdiction in each state and union territory of India. However, a High Court exercises its original civil and criminal jurisdiction only if the subordinate courts are not authorized by law to try such matters for lack of pecuniary, territorial jurisdiction. • High courts may also enjoy original jurisdiction in certain matters, if so designated especially by the constitution, a state or union law. • The work of most high courts primarily consists of appeals from lower courts and writ petitions in terms of Articles 226 and 227 of the constitution. Writ jurisdiction is also an original jurisdiction of a high court. • At present, there are 25 High Courts in India. Jurisdiction of Courts in India • The basis of structuring of district courts in India is mainly depending upon the discretion of the state governments or the union territories. • Normally these types of courts exercise their power of juridical service in district level. • Types of Jurisdiction in Civil Court - – Subject matter jurisdiction - Under this Court, the Civil Court has the authority to deal with the cases of a particular type and concerning a particular subject matter. For example- cases related to family matters can only be dealt with by the Family Courts and not by NCLT that specifically deals with company matters only. – Territorial Jurisdiction- When a court exercises its powers within its territory then it is called the territorial jurisdiction. This Court can decide within a geographical limit of the jurisdiction of the court and it can not exercise its powers outside the geographical limit. For example, Madhya Pradesh will have jurisdiction to decide matters arising within Madhya Pradesh only and not outside. – Pecuniary Jurisdiction - Under this jurisdiction, the Court has the authority to hear and decide the cases on the basis of the monetary value or the amount of the case or the suit in question. Types of Criminal Courts • The Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 states that there shall be four classes of criminal courts: Court of Session, Judicial Magistrate First Class, Judicial Magistrate Second Class, Executive Magistrate. • Court of Session - The State Government establishes the Sessions Court which has to be presided by a Judge appointed by the High Court. The High Court appoints Additional as well as Assistant Sessions Judges. The Court of Sessions ordinarily sits at such place or places as ordered by the High Court. The Assistant Sessions judges are answerable to the Sessions judge. • Court of Metropolitan Magistrate - They are established in Metropolitan areas. The High Courts have the power to appoint the presiding officers. The Metropolitan Magistrate shall be appointed as the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate. The Metropolitan Magistrate shall work under the instructions of the Sessions Judge. • Court of Judicial Magistrate – – The Judicial Magistrate: - In every district, which is not a metropolitan area, there shall be as many as Judicial Magistrates of first class and of second class. The presiding officers shall be appointed by the High Courts. Every Judicial Magistrate shall be subordinate to the Sessions Judge. – Chief Judicial Magistrate: - Except for the Metropolitan area, the Judicial Magistrate of the first class shall be appointed as the Chief Judicial Magistrate. Only the Judicial Magistrate of First Class may be designated as Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate. • Court of Executive Magistrate - The State Government in every district and metropolitan area can appoint as many Executive Magistrates as it may deem fit. One of them shall be District Magistrate (DM), another Additional District Magistrate (ADM) can be appointed. The Executive Magistrates shall look into administrative and executive cases. • Appellate Jurisdiction - Courts with higher authority have the power to exercise appellate jurisdiction. Under this jurisdiction, the court with higher authority can review the case that has already been decided by a lower court. • In our country, cases are brought in the form of appeal in the Supreme Court and the High Court, both these courts have the power of appellate jurisdiction. They have the power to overrule the decisions of the lower court.
Critique On The Lens of Kantian Ethics, Economic Justice and Economic Inequality With Regards To Corruption: How The Rich Get Richer and Poor Get Poorer
Dalesha Christopher and Nadean Bailey on behalf of Jerome Stevenson Jr. vs. Bryon Oneal White Frank Overbey III, Bruce Cazelot, Sheriff David Dauzat, State of Louisiana through the Department of Public Safety and Corrections and ABC Insurance Co.