Idt MTP - May 2018 To May 2021

Test Series: March, 2018
MOCK TEST PAPER

FINAL (NEW) GROUP - II
PAPER 8: INDIRECT TAX LAWS
Question no. 1 is compulsory. Attempt any four questions out of the remaining five questions
Maximum Marks: 100 Marks Time Allowed: 3 Hours
Note:
(i) Working Notes should form part of the answer.
(ii) Wherever necessary, suitable assumptions may be made by the candidates and disclosed by way of a
note.
(iii) All questions should be answered on the basis of position of (i) GST law as amended up to 31st October,
2017 and (ii) customs law as amended by the Finance Act, 2017 and notifications/circulars issued till
31st October, 2017.
(iv) The GST rates for goods and services mentioned in various questions are hypothetical and may not
necessarily be the actual rates leviable on those goods and services. The rates of customs duty are
also hypothetical and may not necessarily be the actual rates. Further, GST compensation cess should
be ignored in all the questions, wherever applicable.
1. (a) V-Supply Pvt. Ltd. is a registered manufacturer of auto parts in Kolkata, West Bengal. The
company has a manufacturing facility registered under Factories Act, 1948 in Kolkata. It procures
its inputs indigenously from both registered and unregistered suppliers located within as well as
outside West Bengal as also imports some raw material from China.
The company reports the following details for the month of November, 20XX:
Payments ` (in lakh) Receipts ` (in lakh)
Raw material 3.5 Sales 15
Consumables 1.25
Transportation charges for bringing the raw 0.70
material to factory
Salary paid to employees on rolls 5.0
Premium paid on life insurance policies taken for 1.60
specified employees
Audit fee 0.50
Telephone expenses 0.30
Bank charges 0.10
All the above amounts are exclusive of all kinds of taxes, wherever applicable. However, the
applicable taxes have also been paid by the company.
Further, following additional details are furnished by the company in respect of the payments and
receipts reported by it:
(i) Raw material amounting to ` 0.80 lakh is procured from Bihar and ` 1.5 lakh is imported from
China. Basic customs duty of ` 0.15 lakh, education cesses of ` 0.0045 lakh and integrated
tax of ` 0.29781 lakh are paid on the imported raw material. Remaining raw material is
procured from suppliers located in West Bengal. Out of such raw material, raw material worth
1
© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India

` 0.30 lakh is procured from unregistered suppliers; the remaining raw material is procured
from registered suppliers. Further, raw material worth ` 0.05 lakh purchased from registered
supplier located in West Bengal has been destroyed due to seepage problem in the factory
and thus, could not be used in the manufacturing process.
(ii) Consumables are procured from registered suppliers located in Kolkata and include diesel
worth ` 0.25 lakh for running the generator in the factory.
(iii) Transportation charges comprise of ` 0.60 lakh paid to Goods Transport Agency (GTA) in
Kolkata and ` 0.10 lakh paid to horse pulled carts. GST applicable on the services of GTA is
5%.
(iv) Life insurance policies for specified employees have been taken by the company to fulfill a
statutory obligation in this regard. The Government has notified such life insurance service
under section 17(5)(b)(iii)(A). The life insurance service provider is registered in West Bengal.
(v) Audit fee is paid to M/s Goyal & Co., a firm of Chartered Accountants registered in West
Bengal, for the statutory audit of the preceding financial year.
(vi) Telephone expenses pertain to bills for landline phone installed at the factory and mobile
phones given to employees for official use. The telecom service provider is registered in West
Bengal.
(vii) Bank charges are towards company’s current account maintained with a Private Sector Bank
registered in West Bengal.
(viii) The break up of sales is as under:
Sales in West Bengal – ` 7 lakh
Sales in States other than West Bengal – ` 3 lakh
Export under bond – ` 5 lakh
The balance of input tax credit with the company as on 1.11.20XX is:
CGST - ` 0.15 lakh
SGST - ` 0.08 lakh
IGST - ` 0.10 lakh
Compute eligible input tax credit and net GST payable [CGST, SGST or IGST, as the case may
be] by V-Supply Pvt. Ltd. for the month of November 20XX.
Note-
(i) CGST, SGST & IGST rates to be 9%, 9% and 18% respectively, wherever applicable.
(ii) The necessary conditions for availing input tax credit have been complied with by V-Supply
Pvt. Ltd., wherever applicable.
You are required to make suitable assumptions, wherever necessary. (10 Marks)
(b) Agrawal Carriers is a Goods Transport Agency (GTA) engaged in transportation of goods by road.
As per the general business practice, Agrawal Carriers also provides intermediary and ancillary
services like loading/unloading, packing/unpacking, transhipment and temporary warehousing , in
relation to transportation of goods by road.

With reference to the provisions of GST law, analyse whether such services are to be treated as
part of the GTA service, being a composite supply, or as separate supplies. (5 Marks)
(c) 15000 chalices were imported for charitable distribution in India by XY Charitable Trust. The Trust
did not pay either for the cost of goods or for the design and development charges, which was
borne by the supplier. Customs officer computed its FOB value at USD 20,000 (including design
and development charges), which was accepted by the Trust. Other details obtained were as
follows:
Sl. Particulars Amount

No.
1. Freight paid (air) (in USD) 4,500
2. Design & development charges paid in USA (in USD) 2,500
3. Commission payable to an agent in India (in `) 12,500
4. Exchange rate notified by CBEC and rate of basic duty is as follows:
Date of Bill of Entry BCD Exchange Rate in `
08.09.20XX 20% 60
Date of arrival of aircraft BCD Exchange Rate in `
30.09.20XX 10% 62
The inter-bank rate was 1 USD = ` 63
5. Integrated tax payable u/s 3(7) of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 12%
6. Education cess and Secondary and higher education cess as applicable
Compute the amount of total customs duty and integrated tax payable on importation of chalices.
Make suitable assumptions where required. Working notes should form part of your answer.
(5 Marks)
2. (a) Alok Pvt. Ltd., a registered manufacturer, sent steel cabinets worth ` 50 lakh under a delivery
challan to M/s Prem Tools, a registered job worker, for job work on 28.01.20XX. The scope of job
work included mounting the steel cabinets on a metal frame and sending the mounted panels back
to Alok Pvt. Ltd. The metal frame is to be supplied by M/s Prem Tools. M/s Prem Tools has agreed
to a consideration of ` 5 lakh for the entire mounting activity including the supply of metal frame.
During the course of mounting activity, metal waste is generated which is sold by M/s. Prem Tools
for ` 45,000. M/s Prem Tools sent the steel cabinets mounted on the metal frame to Alok Pvt. Ltd.
on 03.12.20XX.
Assuming GST rate for metal frame as 28%, for metal waste as 12% and standard rate for services
as 18%, you are required to compute the GST liability of M/s Prem Tools. Also, give reason(s) for
inclusion or exclusion of the value of cabinets in the job charges for the purpose of payment of
GST by M/s Prem Tools. (7 Marks)
(b) Kaya Trade Links Pvt. Ltd. is a registered manufacturer of premium ceiling fans. It sells its fans
exclusively through distributors appointed across the country. The maximum retail price (MRP)
printed on the package of a fan is ` 10,000. The company sells the ceiling fans to distributors at
` 7,000 per fan (exclusive of applicable taxes). The applicable rate of GST on ceiling fans is 18%.

The stock is dispatched to the distributors on quarterly basis - stock for a quarter being dispatched
in the second week of the month preceding the relevant quarter. However, additional stock is
dispatched at any point of the year if the company receives a requisition to that effect from any of
its distributors. The company charges ` 1,000 per fan from distributors towards packing expenses.
The company has a policy to offer a discount of 10% (per fan) on fans supplied to the distributors
for a quarter, if the distributors sell 500 fans in the preceding quarter. The discount is offered on
the price at which the fans are sold to the distributors (excluding all charges and taxes).
The company appoints Prakash Sales as a distributor on 1st April and dispatches 750 fans on
8th April as stock for the quarter April-June. Prakash Sales places a purchase order of 1,000 fans
with the company for the quarter July-September. The order is dispatched by the company on 10 th
June and the same is received by the distributor on 18 th June. The distributor makes the payment
for the fans on 26 th June and avails applicable input tax credit. The distributor reports sales of
700 fans for the quarter April-June and 850 fans for the quarter July-September.
Examine the scenario with reference to section 15 of the CGST Act, 2017 and compute the taxable
value of fans supplied by Kaya Trade Links Pvt. Ltd. to Prakash Sales during the quarter July-
September.
Note: Make suitable assumptions, wherever necessary. (8 Marks)
(c) Discuss the similarities and differences between Advance Authorization and DFIA (Duty Free
Import Authorization) schemes. (5 Marks)
3. (a) Honeycure Laboratories Ltd. is a registered supplier of bulk drugs in Delhi. It manufactures bulk
drugs and supplies the same in the domestic and overseas market. The bulk drugs are supplied
within Delhi and in the overseas market directly from the company’s warehouse located in South
Delhi. For supplies in other States of India, the company has appointed consignment agents in
each such State. However, supplies in Gurgaon (Haryana) and Noida (U.P.) are effected directly
from South Delhi warehouse. The drugs are supplied to the consignment agents from the South
Delhi warehouse.
Honeycure Laboratories Ltd. also provides drug development services to drug manufacturers
located in India, including testing of their new drugs in its laboratory located in Delhi.
The company has furnished the following information for the month of January, 20XX:
Particulars `
Advance received towards drug development services to be provided to 5,00,000
Orochem Ltd., a drug manufacturer, located in Delhi [Drug development
services have been provided in February, 20XX and invoice is issued on
28.02.20XX]
Advance received for bulk drugs to be supplied to Novick Pharmaceuticals, a 6,00,000
wholesale dealer of drugs in Gurgaon, Haryana [Invoice for the goods is issued
at the time of delivery of the drugs in March, 20XX]
Supply of bulk drugs to wholesale dealers of drugs in Delhi 60,00,000
Bulk drugs supplied to Anchor Pharmaceuticals Inc., USA under bond 90,00,000
[Consideration received in convertible foreign exchange]
Drug development services provided to Unipharma Ltd., a drug manufacturer, 6,00,000
located in Delhi

You are required to determine the GST liability [CGST & SGST or IGST, as the case may be] of
Honeycure Laboratories Ltd. for the month of January, 20XX with the help of the following additiona l
information furnished by it for the said period:
1. Consignments of bulk drugs were sent to Cardinal Pharma Pvt. Ltd. and Rochester Medicos
– agents of Honeycure Laboratories Ltd. in Punjab and Haryana respectively. Cardinal
Pharma Pvt. Ltd. and Rochester Medicos supplied these drugs to the Medical Stores located
in their respective States for ` 60,00,000 and ` 50,00,000 respectively.
2. Bulk drugs have been supplied to Ronn Medicos Pvt. Ltd. - a wholesale dealer of bulk drugs
in Gurgaon, Haryana for consideration of ` 15,00,000. Honeycure Laboratories Ltd. owns
60% shares of Ronn Medicos Pvt. Ltd. Open market value of the bulk drugs supplied to Ronn
Medicos Pvt. Ltd. is ` 30,00,000. Further, Ronn Medicos Pvt. Ltd. is not eligible for full input
tax credit.
3. The turnover of Honeycure Laboratories Ltd. in the preceding financial year was ` 70 lakh
with regard to supply of bulk drugs and ` 45 lakh with regard to supply of drug development
services.
Note:
(i) All the given amounts are exclusive of GST, wherever applicable.
(ii) Assume the rates of GST to be as under:
Goods/services supplied CGST SGST IGST
Bulk drugs 2.5% 2.5% 5%
Drug development services 9% 9% 18%
(b) A professional training institute gets its training material printed from a printing press. The content
of the material is provided by the training institute who owns the usage rights of the same while the
physical inputs including paper used for printing belong to the printer.
Ascertain whether supply of training material by the printing press constitutes supply of goods or
supply of services. (5 Marks)
(c) Siya imported certain goods in May, 20XX. An ‘into Bond’ bill of entry was presented on 14th May,
20XX and goods were cleared from the port for warehousing. Assessable value on that date was
US $ 1,00,000. The order permitting the deposit of goods in warehouse for 4 months was issued
on 21st May, 20XX. Siya deposited the goods in warehouse on the same day but did not clear the
imported goods even after the warehousing period got over on 21 st September, 20XX. A notice
was issued under section 72 of the Customs Act, 1962, demanding duty and interest. Siya cleared
the goods on 14th October, 20XX.
Compute the amount of customs duty and interest payable by Siya while removing the goods on
the basis of the following information:
Particulars 14-05-20XX 21-09-20XX 14-10-20XX
Rate of exchange per US $ (as notified by
` 65.20 ` 65.40 ` 65.50
Central Board of Excise & Customs)
Basic customs duty 15% 10% 12%
Integrated tax leviable under section 3(7) of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 is exempt. (5 Marks)

4. (a) (i) AB Pvt. Ltd., Pune provides house-keeping services. The company supplies its services
exclusively through an e-commerce website owned and managed by Hi-Tech Indya Pvt. Ltd.,
Pune. The turnover of AB Pvt. Ltd. in the current financial year is ` 18 lakh.
Advise AB Pvt. Ltd. as to whether they are required to obtain GST registration. Will your
advice be any different if AB Pvt. Ltd. sells readymade garments exclusively through the
e-commerce website owned and managed by Hi-Tech Indya Pvt. Ltd.? (6 Marks)
(ii) Avtaar Enterprises, Kanpur started trading in ayurvedic medicines from July 1, 20XX. Its
turnover exceeded ` 20 lakh on October 3, 20XX. The firm applied for registration on October
31, 20XX and was issued registration certificate on November 5, 20XX.
Examine whether any revised invoice can be issued in the given scenario. If the answer to
the first question is in affirmative, determine the period for which the revised invoices can be
issued as also the last date upto which the same can be issued. (4 Marks)
(b) Whether action can be taken for transportation of goods without valid documents or if goods are
attempted to be removed without proper record in books? If yes, explain the related provisions
under the CGST Act, 2017. (5 Marks)
(c) After visiting USA for a month, Mrs. & Mr. Subramanian (Indian residents aged 35 and 40 years
respectively) brought to India a laptop computer valued at ` 60,000, used personal effects valued
at ` 1,20,000 and a personal computer for ` 54,000.
Calculate the customs duty payable by Mrs. & Mr. Subramanian. (5 Marks)
5. (a) (i) Pursuant to audit conducted by the tax authorities under section 65 of the CGST Act, 2017, a
show cause notice was issued to Home Furnishers, Surat, a registered supplier, alleging that
it had wrongly availed the input tax credit without actual receipt of goods for the month of July,
20XX. In the absence of a satisfactory reply from Home Furnishers, Joint Commissioner of
Central Tax passed an adjudication order dated 20.08.20XX (received by Home Furnishers
on 22.08.20XX) confirming a tax demand of ` 50,00,000 and imposing a penalty of equal
amount under section 122 of the CGST Act, 2017.
Home Furnishers does not agree with the order passed by the Joint Commissioner. It decides
to file an appeal with the Appellate Authority against the said adjudication o rder. It has
approached you for seeking advice on the following issues in this regard:
(1) Can Home Furnishers file an appeal to Appellate Authority against the adjudication order
passed by the Joint Commissioner of Central Tax? If yes, till what date can the appeal
be filed? (2 Marks)
(2) Does Home Furnishers need to approach both the Central and State Appellate
Authorities for exercising its right of appeal?
(2 Marks)
(3) Home Furnishers is of the view that there is no requirement of paying pre-deposit of any
kind before filing an appeal with the Appellate Authority. Give your opinion on the issue.
(2 Marks)
(ii) Everest Technologies Private Limited has been issued a show cause notice (SCN) on
31.01.2021 under section 73(1) of the CGST Act, 2017 on account of short payment of tax
during the period between 01.07.2017 and 31.12.2017. Everest Technologies Private Limited
contends that the show cause notice issued to it is time-barred in law.

You are required to examine the technical veracity of the contention of Everest Technologies
Private Limited. (4 Marks)
(b) With reference to the provisions of CGST Act, 2017, explain the liability of partners of firm to pay
tax? (5 Marks)
(c) State the purpose of including Interpretation Rules in Customs Tariff. Do they form part of the
Tariff Schedule? Explain the Akin Rule of interpretation. (5 Marks)
6. (a) (i) Discuss the procedure for amendment of registration under CGST Act and rules thereto?
(4 Marks)
(ii) With reference to the provisions of section 120 of the CGST Act, 2017, list the cases in which
appeal is not to be filed. (6 Marks)
(b) Explain the situation in which access to business premises is allowed under section 71 of the CGST
Act, 2017? Also, list the records which are to be produced during access to business premises?
(5 Marks)
(c) An importer imported certain inputs for manufacture of final product. A small portion of the imported
inputs were damaged in transit and could not be used in the manufacture of the final product. An
exemption notification was in force providing customs duty exemption in respect of specified raw
materials imported into India for use in manufacture of specified goods, which was applicable to
the imports made by the importer in the present case.
Briefly examine with the help of a decided case law whether the importer could claim the benefit of
the aforesaid notification in respect of the entire lot of the imported inputs including those that were
damaged in transit. (5 Marks)

MOCK TEST PAPER

SUGGESTED ANSWERS
GST law is in its nascent stage and has been subject to frequent changes. Although various
clarifications have been issued in the past few months by way of FAQs or otherwise, many issues
continue to arise on account of varying interpretations on several of its provisions. Therefore,
alternate answers may be possible for the questions depending upon the view taken.
For the sake of brevity, Central Goods and Services Tax, Integrated Goods and Services Tax, Central Goods
and Services Tax Act, 2017, Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and Central Goods and Services
Tax Rules, 2017 have been referred to as CGST, IGST, CGST Act, IGST Act a nd CGST Rules respectively.
1. (a) Computation of input tax credit available with V-Supply Pvt. Ltd. in the month of November 20XX
S. Particulars Eligible input tax credit

No. CGST* SGST* IGST* Total
` ` ` `
1. Raw Material
Raw material purchased from Bihar
14,400 14,400
[Refer Note 1(i)]
Raw material imported from China [Refer
29,781 29,781
Note 1(ii)]
Raw material purchased from
unregistered suppliers within West Nil Nil Nil
Bengal [Refer Note 1(iii)]
Raw material destroyed due to seepage
Nil Nil Nil
[Refer Note 1(iv)]
Remaining raw material purchased from
7,650 7,650 15,300
West Bengal [Refer Note 1(i)]
Total 7,650 7,650 44,181 59,481
2. Consumables [Refer Note 2] 9,000 9,000 18,000
3. Transportation charges for bringing the
1,500 1,500 3,000
raw material to factory [Refer Note 3]
4. Salary paid to employees on rolls [Refer
Nil Nil Nil Nil
Note 4]
5. Premium paid on life insurance policies
taken for specified employees [Refer 14,400 14,400 - 28,800
Note 5]
6. Audit fee [Refer Note 6] 4,500 4,500 - 9,000
7. Telephone expenses [Refer Note 6] 2,700 2,700 5,400
8. Bank charges [Refer Note 6] 900 900 1,800
40,650 40,650 44,181 1,25,481

Computation of net GST payable
Particulars CGST* SGST* IGST* Total

` ` ` `
On Intra-state sales in West Bengal 63,000 63,000 1,26,000
On Inter-state sales other than West
54,000 54,000
Bengal
On exports under bond [Note 7] Nil Nil Nil Nil
On inward supply of GTA services
1,500 1,500 3,000
under reverse charge [Note 3]
Total output tax liability 64,500 64,500 54,000 1,83,000
Less: Cash paid towards tax payable
(1,500) (1,500) (3,000)
Less: Input tax credit [Note 8]
Opening balance of input tax credit on
(15,000) (8,000) (10,000) (33,000)
01.11.20XX
Input tax credit availed during the
(40,650) (40,650) (44,181) (1,25,481)
month
181 (IGST)
Net GST payable 7,169 14,350 Nil 21,519
Notes:
(1) (i) Credit of input tax (CGST & SGST/ IGST) paid on raw materials used in the course or
furtherance of business is available in terms of section 16(1) of the CGST Act.
(ii) IGST paid on imported goods qualifies as input tax in terms of section 2(62)(a) of the
CGST Act. Therefore, credit of IGST paid on imported raw materials used in the course
or furtherance of business is available in terms of section 16(1) of the CGST Act.
(iii) All intra-State procurements made by a registered person from an unregistered supplier
have been exempted from CGST leviable thereon till 31.03.2018 [Notification No. 8/2017
CT (R) dated 28.06.2017 as amended by Notification No. 38/2017 CT (R) dated
13.10.2017]. Therefore, since no GST is paid on such raw material, there does not arise
any question of input tax credit on such raw material.
(iv) Input tax credit is not available on destroyed inputs in terms of section 17(5)(h) of the
CGST Act.
2. Consumables, being inputs used in the course or furtherance of business, input tax credit is
available on the same in terms of section 16(1) of the CGST Act. However, levy of CGST on
diesel has been deferred till such date as may be notified by the Government on
recommendations of the GST Council [Section 9(2) of the CGST Act]. Hence, there being no
levy of GST on diesel, there cannot be any input tax credit of the same.
3. In respect of intra-State road transportation of goods undertaken by a GTA, who has not paid
CGST @ 6%, for any person registered under the GST law, CGST is payable under reverse
charge by the recipient of service. The person who pays or is liable to pay freight for the
transportation of goods is treated as the person who receives the service [Notification No.
13/2017 CT (R) dated 28.06.2017]. Thus, V-Supply Pvt. Ltd. will pay GST under reverse
charge on transportation service received from GTA.

Further, tax payable under section 9(3) of the CGST/SGST Act qualifies as input tax in terms
of clauses (b) and (d) of section 2(62) of the CGST Act. Thus, input tax paid under reverse
charge on GTA service will be available as input tax credit in terms of section 16(1) of the
CGST Act as the said service is used in course or furtherance of business.
Furthermore, intra-State services by way of transportation of goods by road except the
services of a GTA and a courier agency are exempt from CGST vide Notification No. 12/2017
CT (R) dated 28.06.2017. Therefore, since no GST is paid on such services, there cannot be
any input tax credit on such services.
4. Services by employees to employer in the course of or in relation to his employment is not a
supply in terms of section 7 read with para 1 of Schedule III to the CGST Act. Therefore,
since no GST is paid on horse pulled cart services, there cannot be any input tax credit on
such services.
5. Input tax credit on supply of life insurance service is not blocked if the Government has made
it obligatory for an employer to provide such service to its employees [Section 17(5)(b)(iii)(A)
of the CGST Act]. Therefore, GST paid on premium for life insurance policies will be available
as input tax credit in terms of section 16(1) of the CGST Act as the said service is used in the
course or furtherance of business.
6. Audit fee, telephone expenses and bank charges are all services used in the course or
furtherance of business and thus, credit of input tax paid on such service will be available in
terms of section 16(1) of the CGST Act.
7. Export of goods is a zero rated supply in terms of section 16(1)(a) of the IGST Act. A zero
rated supply under bond is made without payment of integrated tax [Section 16(3)(a) of the
IGST Act].
8. Since export of goods is a zero rated supply, there will be no apportionment of input tax credit
and full credit will be available [Section 16 of the IGST Act read with section 17(2) of the
CGST Act].
9. As per section 49(5) of the CGST Act, input tax credit of-
(i) IGST is utilised towards payment of IGST, CGST and SGST in that order.
(ii) CGST is utilised towards payment of CGST and IGST in that order.
(iii) SGST is utilised towards payment of SGST and IGST in that order
10. Section 49(4) of the CGST Act lays down that the amount available in the electronic credit
ledger may be used for making payment towards output tax. However, tax payable under
reverse charge is not an output tax in terms of section 2(82) of the CGST Act. Therefore, tax
payable under reverse charge cannot be set off against the input tax credit and thus, will have
to be paid in cash.
*11. CGST and SGST are chargeable on intra-State inward and outward supplies and IGST is
chargeable on inter-State inward and outward supplies.
(b) Composite supply means a supply made by a taxable person to a recipient consisting of two or
more taxable supplies of goods or services or both, or any combination thereof, which are naturally
bundled and supplied in conjunction with each other in the ordinary course of business, one of
which is a principal supply [Section 2(30) of the CGST Act].
The GTA provides various intermediary and ancillary services, such as, loading/unloading,
packing/unpacking, transhipment and temporary warehousing, which are provided in the course of
transport of goods by road. These services are not provided as independent services but as
ancillary to the principal service, namely, transportation of goods by road. The invoice issued by
the GTA for providing the said service includes the value of intermediary and ancillary services.

In view of this, if any intermediary and ancillary service is provided in relation to transportation of
goods by road, and charges, if any, for such services are included in the invoice issued by the
GTA, such service would form part of the GTA service, being a composite supply, and would not
be treated as a separate supply. However, if such incidental services are provided as separate
services and charged separately, whether in the same invoice or separate invoices, they shall be
treated as separate supplies.
[Based on answer to question no. 6 of FAQs issued by the CBEC on Transport & Logistics]
(c) Computation of total customs duty and integrated tax payable
Particulars Amount
FOB value computed by Customs Officer (including design and 20,000 US $
development charges)
Exchange rate [Note 1] ` 60 per $
(`)
FOB value computed by Customs Officer (in rupees) 12,00,000.00
Add: Commission payable to agent in India 12,500.00
FOB value as per customs 12,12,500.00
Add: Air freight (` 12,12,500 × 20%) [Note 2] 2,42,500.00
Add: Insurance (1.125% of ` 12,12,500) [Note 3] 13,640.63
CIF value for customs purposes 14,68,640.63
Assessable value 14 68,640.63
Add: Basic custom duty @ 10% (` 14,68,640.63 × 10%) – rounded off 1,46,864.00
[Note 4]
Add: Education Cess @ 2% & Secondary and higher education cess @ 1% 4,406.00
on ` 1,46,864-rounded off
Total 16,19,910.63
Integrated tax leviable under section 3(7) of Customs Tariff Act, 1975 @ 1,94,389.15
12% (` 16,19,909.63 × 12%) [Rounded off] [Note 5]
Total customs duty and integrated tax payable 3,45,659.00
Notes:
1. Rate of exchange notified by CBEC on the date of filing of bill of entry has to be considered
[Third proviso to section 14 of the Customs Act, 1962].
2. In case of goods imported by air, cost of loading, unloading & handling charges associated
with the delivery of the imported goods to the place of importation cannot exceed 20% of FOB
value [Fifth proviso to rule 10(2) of the Customs (Determination of Value of Imported Goods)
Rules, 2007].
3. Insurance charges, when not ascertainable, have to be included @ 1.125% of FOB value of
goods [Third proviso to rule 10(2) of the Customs Valuation (Determination of Value of
Imported Goods) Rules, 2007].
4. Rate of duty will be the rate in force on the date of presentation of bill of entry or on the date
of arrival of the aircraft, whichever is later [Proviso to section 15(1) of the Customs Act, 1962].

5. Integrated tax leviable under section 3(7) of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 is levied on the sum
total of the assessable value of the imported goods, customs duties and applicable education
cess and secondary and higher education cess.
2. (a) As per para 3 of Schedule II to the CGST Act, any treatment or process which is applied to another
person’s goods is a supply of services and accordingly is subject to GST rate applicable for
services.
In the given case, M/s Prem Tools (job worker) undertakes the process of mounting the steel
cabinets of Alok Pvt. Ltd. (principal) on metal frames. In view of para 3 of Schedule II to the CGST
Act cited above, the mounting activity classifies as service even though metal frames are also
supplied as a part of the mounting activity. Accordingly, the job charges will be chargeable to rate
of 18%, which is the applicable rate for services.
Further, the value of steel cabinets will not be included in the value of taxable supply made by
M/s Prem Tools as the supply of cabinets does not fall within the scope of supply to be made by
M/s Prem Tools. M/s Prem Tools is only required to mount the steel cabinets, which are to be
supplied by Alok Pvt. Ltd., on metal frames, which are to be supplied by it.
As regards sale of waste generated during the job work, since M/s Prem Tools is registered, the
tax leviable on the supply will have to be paid by it in terms of section 143(5) of the CGST Act.
Such supply will be treated as supply of goods and subject to GST rate applicable for metal waste.
Accordingly, the GST liability of M/s Prem Tools will be computed as under:
Particulars Amount
(`)
Job charges 5,00,000
GST @ 18% (A) 90,000
Sale of metal waste 45,000
GST @ 12% (B) 5,400
Total GST payable (A) + (B) 95,400
(b) Section 15(3)(a) of the CGST Act allows discounts to be deducted from the value of taxable supply
if the same is given before or at the time of the supply and if such discount has been duly recorded
in the invoice issued in respect of such supply. In other words, pre-supply discounts recorded in
invoices are allowed as deduction.
Further, post supply discounts are also allowed as deduction from the value of supply under section
15(3)(b) of the CGST Act if-
(i) such discount is established in terms of an agreement entered into at or before the time of
such supply and specifically linked to relevant invoices; and
(ii) input tax credit as is attributable to the discount on the basis of document issued by the
supplier has been reversed by the recipient of the supply.
In the given case, Prakash Sales is entitled for 10% discount on fans supplied by Kaya Trade Links
Pvt. Ltd. for the quarter July-September as it has sold more than 500 fans in the preceding quarter
April-June. However, since the entire stock for the quarter July-September has already been
despatched by Kaya Trade Links Pvt. Ltd. in the month of June, the discounts on the fans supplied
to Prakash Sales for the quarter July-September will be a post-supply discount.

Such post-supply discount will be allowed as a deduction from the value of supply since the
discount policy was known before the time of such supply and the discount can be specifically
linked to relevant invoices (invoices pertaining to fans supplied to Prakash Sales for the quarter
July-September) provided Prakash Sales reverses the input tax credit attributable to the discount
on the basis of document issued by Kaya Trade Links Pvt. Ltd.
The value of supply will thus, be computed as under:
Particulars Amount
(`)
Price at which the fans are supplied to Prakash Sales [Note 1] 7,000
Add: Packing expenses [Note 2] 1,000
Less: Discount [Note 3] (700)
Value of taxable supply of one unit of fan 7,300
Value of taxable supply of fans for the quarter July-September 73,00,000
[` 7,300 x 1,000]
Notes:
(1) The value of a supply is the transaction value, which is the price actually paid or payable for
the said supply, in terms of section 15(1) of the CGST Act presuming that the supplier and
the recipient of supply are not related and price is the sole consideration for the supply.
(2) The value of supply includes incidental expenses like packing charges in terms of section
15(2)(c) of the CGST Act.
(3) Since all the conditions specified in section 15(3)(b) of the CGST Act have been fulfilled, the
post-supply discount will be allowed as deduction from the value of supply presuming that
Prakash Sales has reversed the input tax credit attributable to such discount on the basis of
document issued by Kaya Trade Links Pvt. Ltd. The input tax credit to be reversed will work
out to be ` 1.26 lakh [1,000 x (7,000 x 10%) x 18%].
(c) In both DFIA and Advance Authorization schemes, import of inputs, oil and catalyst which are
required for export products are permitted without payment of customs duty.
The differences between DFIA and Advance Authorisation schemes are as follows -
(i) Advance Authorisation is not transferable. DFIA is transferable after export obligation is
fulfilled.
(ii) Advance Authorisation scheme requires 15% value addition, while in case of DFIA, minimum
20% value addition is required.
(iii) Advance Authorisation scheme is available to gem and jewellery sector but not DFIA is not
available to the said sector.
(iv) DFIA cannot be issued where SION (Standard Input Output Norms) prescribes actual user
condition [as the material is transferable after fulfilment of export obligation].
(v) Advance Authorisation can be issued even if SION for that product is not fixed. DIFA can be
issued only if SION has been fixed for the product to be exported.
3. (a) Computation of GST Liability of Honeycure Laboratories Ltd. for the month of January, 20XX
Particulars CGST (`) SGST (`) IGST (`)
Advance received for drug 45,000 45,000
development services [5,00,000 × 9%] [5,00,000 × 9%]
supplied to Orochem Ltd., a

drug manufacturer, located
in Delhi [Note - 1]
Advance received for bulk Nil
drugs to be supplied to
Novick Pharmaceuticals, a
wholesale dealer of drugs in
Gurgaon, Haryana [Note - 2]
Supply of bulk drugs to 1,50,000 [60,00,000 1,50,000
wholesale dealers of drugs × 2.5%] [60,00,000 ×
in Delhi 2.5%]
[Note - 3]
Bulk drugs supplied to Nil
Anchor Pharmaceuticals
Inc., USA
[Note - 4]
Supply of drug development 54,000 54,000
services to Unipharma Ltd., [6,00,000 × 9%] [6,00,000× 9%]
a drug manufacturer, located
in Delhi [Note - 5]
Supply of bulk drugs to 4,95,000
consignment agents - [99,00,000 × 5%]
Cardinal Pharma Pvt. Ltd.
and Rochester Medicos of
Punjab and Haryana [Note -
6]
Supply of bulk drugs to Ronn 1,50,000
Medicos of Gurgaon, [30,00,000 × 5%]
Haryana [Note - 7]
Total GST liability 2,49,000 2,49,000 6,45,000
Notes:
1. Being an intra-State supply of services, supply of drug development services to Orochem Ltd.
of Delhi is subject to CGST and SGST @ 9% each. Further, in terms of section 13(2) of the
CGST Act, the time of supply of services is the earlier of the date of invoice or date of receipt
of payment, if the invoice is issued within 30 days of the supply of service. In the given case,
invoice is issued within 30 days of the supply of service. Therefore, time of supply of services
will be date of receipt of advance and hence, GST is payable on the advance received in
January, 20XX.
2. Being an inter-State supply of goods, supply of bulk drugs to Novick Pharmaceuticals of
Gurgaon, Haryana is subject to IGST @ 5%. Further, in terms of section 12(2) of the CGST
Act, the time of supply of goods is the earlier of the date of issue of invoice/last date on which
the invoice is required to be issued or date of receipt of payment. However, Notification No.
40/2017 CT dated 13.10.2017 has postponed the time of supply of advance received for
suppliers of goods having aggregate turnover up to ` 1.5 crore in the preceding financial year
(excluding composition suppliers) till the time of issue of invoice. Thus, GST is not payable
at the time of receipt of advance against supply of goods in case of such suppliers 1.
1 Notification No. 40/2017 CT dated 13.10.2017 has been superseded by Notification No. 66/2017 CT dated 15.11.2017
to specify that time of supply for all suppliers of goods (excluding composition suppliers) will be the time of issue of invoice,
without any turnover limit. This amendment has become effective from 15.11.2017.
7

Since the aggregate turnover of Honeycure Laboratories Ltd. does not exceed ` 1.5 crore
[` 1.15 lakh = ` 70 lakh + ` 45 lakh] in the preceding financial year, the time of supply of the
advance received for bulk drugs to be supplied to Novick Pharmaeuticals is the time of issue
of invoice, which is in March, 20XX. Thus, said advance will be taxed in March, 20XX and
not in January, 20XX.
3. Being an intra-State supply of goods, supply of bulk drugs to wholesale dealers of drugs in
Delhi is subject to CGST and SGST @ 2.5 % each.
4. Section 2(5) of the IGST Act defines export of goods as taking goods out of India to a place
outside India. In view of the said definition, supply of the bulk drugs to Anchor
Pharamaceuticals Inc. of USA under bond is export of goods.
Export of goods is a zero-rated supply [Section 16(1) of the IGST Act]. A zero-rated supply
under bond is made without payment of integrated tax [Section 16(3)(a) of IGST Act].
5. Being an intra-State supply of services, supply of drug development services to Unipharma
Ltd. of Delhi is subject to CGST and SGST @ 9% each.
6. Value of supply of goods made through an agent is determined as per rule 29 of the CGST
Rules. Accordingly, the value of supply of goods between the principal and his agent is the
open market value of the goods being supplied, or at the option of the supplier, is 90% of the
price charged for the supply of goods of like kind and quality by the recipient to his unrelated
customer, where the goods are intended for further supply by the said recipient.
In the given case, since open market value is not available, value of bulk drugs supplied to
consignment agents - Cardinal Pharma Ltd. and Rochester Medicos – will be ` 99,00,000
[90% of (` 60,00,000 + ` 50,00,000)]. Further, being an inter-State supply of goods, supply
of bulk drugs to the consignment agents is subject to IGST @ 5%.
7. If any person directly or indirectly controls another person, such persons are deemed as
related persons. [Clause (a)(v) of explanation to section 15 of the CGST Act]. In the given
case, since Honeycure Laboratories Ltd. owns 60% shares of Ronn Medicos, both are related
persons.
Value of supply of goods between related persons (other than through an agent) is determined
as per rule 28 of the CGST Rules. Accordingly, the value of supply of goods between related
persons is the open market value of such goods and not the invoice value. Furthermore,
since Ronn Medicos is not eligible for full input tax credit, value declared in the invoice cannot
be deemed to be the open market value of the goods. Thus, open market value of the bulk
drugs supplied to Ronn Medicos i.e., ` 30,00,000 is the value of supply of such goods.
Further, being an inter-State supply of goods, supply of bulk drugs to Ronn Medicos is subject
to IGST @ 5%.
(b) Circular No. 11/11/2017 GST dated 20.10.2017 has clarified that supply of books printed with
contents supplied by the recipient of such printed goods, is composite supply and the question,
whether such supplies constitute supply of goods or services would be determined on the basis of
what constitutes the principal supply.
Principal supply has been defined in section 2(90) of the CGST Act as supply of goods or services
which constitutes the predominant element of a composite supply and to which any other supply
forming part of that composite supply is ancillary.
In the case of printing of books where content is supplied by the publisher or the person who owns
the usage rights to the intangible inputs while the physical inputs including paper used for printing
belong to the printer, supply of printing [of the content supplied by the recipient of supply] is the
principal supply and therefore, such supplies would constitute supply of service.

(c) Computation of customs duty payable by Siya
Particulars Amount
(US $)
Assessable value 1,00,000
Amount (`)
Value in Indian currency (US $ 1,00,000 x ` 65.20) [Note 1] 65,20,000
Customs duty @ 10% [Note 2] 6,52,000
Add: Education cess @ 2% 13,040
Add: Secondary and higher education cess @ 1% 6,520
Total customs duty payable 6,71,560
Notes:
1. As per third proviso to section 14(1) of the Customs Act, 1962, assessable value has to be
calculated with reference to the rate of exchange prevalent on the date on which the into bond
bill of entry is presented for warehousing under section 46 of the Cus toms Act, 1962.
2. Goods which are not removed within the permissible period are deemed to be improperly
removed in terms of section 72 of the Customs Act, 1962 on the day they should have been
removed [Kesoram Rayon v. CC 1996 (86) ELT 464 (SC)]. The applicable rate of duty in such
a case is the rate of duty prevalent on the last date on which the goods should have been
removed.
As per section 61(2) of the Customs Act, 1962, if goods (not meant for being used in an 100%
EOU, STP unit, EHTP unit) remain in a warehouse beyond a period of 90 days from the date
on which the order under section 60(1) of the Customs Act, 1962 is made, interest is payable
at such rate as may be fixed by the Central Government under section 47 of the Customs Act,
1962 [i.e. 15% p.a.], on the amount of duty payable at the time of clearance of the goods, for
the period from the expiry of the said 90 days till the date of payment of duty on the
warehoused goods.
Therefore, interest payable will be computed as under:
Period of ninety days commencing from the date of order made under 19.08.20XX
60(1) of the Customs Act, 1962 expires on
No. of days for which interest shall be payable [12 days of August + 30 56 days
days of September + 14 days of October]
 15 56  ` 15,455
Interest payable = ` 6,71,560   (rounded off)
 100 365 
4. (a) (i) As per section 22 of the CGST Act every supplier of goods or services or both is required to
obtain registration in the State/ Union territory from where he makes the taxable supply if his
aggregate turnover exceeds ` 20 lakh [` 10 lakh in case of specified Special Category States]
in a financial year.
However, section 24 of the said Act enlists certain categories of persons who are mandatorily
required to obtain registration, irrespective of their turnover. Persons who supply goods or
services or both through such electronic commerce operator (ECO), who is required to collect
tax at source under section 52, is one such person specified under clause (ix) of section 24.

However, where the ECO is liable to pay tax on behalf of the suppliers of services under a
notification issued under section 9(5), the suppliers of such services are entitled for threshold
exemption.2
Section 2(45) of the CGST Act defines ECO as any person who owns, operates or manages
digital or electronic facility or platform for electronic commerce. Electronic commerce is
defined under section 2(44) to mean the supply of goods or services or both, including digital
products over digital or electronic network. Since Hi-Tech Indya Pvt. Ltd. owns and manages
a website for e commerce where both goods and services are supplied, it will be classified as
an ECO under section 2(45).
Notification No. 17/2017 CT (R) dated 28.06.2017 issued under section 9(5) specifies services
by way of house-keeping, except where the person supplying such service through ECO is
liable for registration under section 22(1), as one such service where the ECO is liable to pay
tax on behalf of the suppliers.
In the given case, AB Pvt. Ltd. provides house-keeping services through an ECO. It is
presumed that Hi-Tech Indya is an ECO which is required to collect tax at source under
section 52. However, house-keeping services provided by AB Pvt. Ltd., which is not liable for
registration under section 22(1) as its turnover is less than ` 20 lakh, is a service notified
under section 9(5). Thus, AB Pvt. Ltd. will be entitled for threshold exemption for registration
and will not be required to obtain registration even though it supplies services through ECO.
In the second case, AB Pvt. Ltd. sells readymade garments through ECO. Such supply cannot
be notified under section 9(5) as only supplies of services are notified under that section.
Therefore, in the second case, AB Pvt. Ltd. will not be entitled for threshold exemption and
will have to compulsorily obtain registration in terms of section 24(ix).
(ii) As per section 31(3)(a) of the CGST Act, a registered person may, within one month from the
date of issuance of certificate of registration, issue a revised invoice against the invoice
already issued during the period beginning with the effective date of registration till the date
of issuance of certificate of registration to him.
Further, rule 10(2) of CGST Rules lays down that the registration shall be effective from the
date on which the person becomes liable to registration where the application for registration
has been submitted within a period of 30 days from such date.
In the given case, Avtaar Enterprises has applied for registration within 30 days of becoming
liable for registration and the registration has been granted. Thus, the effective date of
registration is the date on which Avtaar Enterprises became liable for registration i.e., October
3, 20XX. Therefore, since in the given case there is a time lag between the effective date of
registration (October 3, 20XX) and the date of grant of certificate of registration (November
5, 20XX), revised invoices can be issued. The same can be issued for supplies made during
this intervening period i.e., for the period beginning with October 3, 20XX till November 5,
20XX. Further, the revised invoices can be issued for the said period till December 5, 20XX.
(b) Yes, action can be taken for transportation of goods without valid documents or if goods are
attempted to be removed without proper record in books. If any person transports any goods or
stores any such goods while in transit without the documents prescribed under the Act (i.e. invoice
and a declaration) or supplies or stores any goods that have not been recorded in the books or
accounts maintained by him, then such goods shall be liable for detention along with any vehicle
on which they are being transported [Section 129 of CGST Act].
2 Persons making supplies of services, other than supplies specified under section 9(5) through an ECO who is required to
collect tax at source under section 52, and having an aggregate turnover, to be computed on all India basis, not exceeding an
amount of ` 20 lakh [` 10 lakh for specified special category States] in a financial year, have been exempted from obtaining
registration vide Notification No. 65/2017 CT dated 15.11.2017.
10

Where owner comes forward: - Such goods shall be released on payment of the applicable tax and
penalty equal to 100% of the tax payable on such goods or upon furnishing of security equivalent to
the said amount.
In case of exempted goods, penalty is 2% of value of goods or ` 25,000/- whichever is less.
Where owner does not come forward: - Such goods shall be released on payment of the applicable
tax and penalty equal to 50% of value of goods reduced by the tax amount paid thereon or upon
furnishing of security equivalent to the said amount.
In case of exempted goods, penalty is 5% of value of goods or ` 25,000/- whichever is lesser.
(c) (1) As per the Baggage Rules, 2016, an Indian resident arriving from an country other than Nepal,
Bhutan or Myanmar is allowed duty free clearance of-
(i) Used personal effects and travel souvenirs without any value limit.
(ii) Articles [other than certain specified articles] upto a value of ` 50,000 carried as
accompanied baggage [General duty free baggage allowance].
Further, such general duty free baggage allowance of a passenger cannot be pooled with the
general duty free baggage allowance of any other passenger.
(2) One laptop computer when imported into India by a passenger of the age of 18 years or above
(other than member of crew) is exempt from whole of the customs duty [Notification No.
11/2004 Cus dated 08.01.2004].
(3) Accordingly, there will be no customs duty on used personal effects (worth
` 1,20,000) of Mrs. and Mr. Subramanian and laptop computer brought by them will be exempt
from duty.
Duty payable on personal computer after exhausting the duty free baggage allowance will be
` 54,000 – ` 50,000 = ` 4,000.
Effective rate of duty for baggage = 36.05% [including education cess & secondary & higher
education cess]
Therefore, total customs duty payable = ` 1,442
5. (a) (i) (1) An appeal against a decision/order passed by any adjudicating authority under the CGST
Act or SGST Act/UTGST Act is appealable before the Appellate Authority [Section 107(1)
of the CGST Act]. Thus, Home Furnishers can file an appeal to Appellate Authority
against the adjudication order passed by the Joint Commissioner of Central Tax.
Further, such appeal can be filed within 3 months from the date of communication of
such decision/order [Section 107(1) of the CGST Act]. Thus, Home Furnishers can file
the appeal to Appellate Authority on or before 22.11.20XX. Further, the Appellate
Authority can also condone the delay in filing of appeal by 1 month if it is satisfied that
there was sufficient cause for such delay [Section 107(4)].
(2) GST law makes provisions for cross empowerment between CGST and SGST/UTGST
officers so as to ensure that if a proper officer of one Act (say CGST) passes an order
with respect to a transaction, he will also act as the proper officer of SGST for the same
transaction and issue the order with respect to the CGST as well as the SGST/UTGST
component of the same transaction.
11

The law further provides that where a proper officer under one Act (say CGST) has
passed an order, any appeal/review/ revision/rectification against the said order will lie
only with the proper officers of that Act only (CGST Act). Similarly, if any order is passed
by the proper officer of SGST, any appeal/review/revision/rectification will lie with the
proper officer of SGST only. Thus, Home Furnishers is required to file an appeal only
with the Central Tax Appellate Authority [Section 6 of CGST Act].
(3) Home Furnishers’ view is not correct in law. Section 107(6) of the CGST Act provides
that no appeal shall be filed before the Appellate Authority, unless the appellant has
paid—
(a) full amount of tax, interest, fine, fee and penalty arising from the impugned order,
as is admitted by him; and
(b) a sum equal to 10% of the remaining amount of tax in dispute arising from the
impugned order.
Since in the given case, Home Furnishers disagrees with the entire tax demanded, it has
to make a pre-deposit of 10% of the amount of tax in dispute arising from the impugned
order, i.e., 10% of ` 50,00,000 which is ` 5,00,000.
(ii) The contention of Everest Technologies Private Limited is not valid in law. The SCN under
section 73(1) of the CGST Act can be issued at least 3 months prior to the time limit specified
for issuance of order under section 73(10) of the CGST Act [Section 73(2) of the CGST Act].
The adjudication order under section 73(10) of the CGST Act has to be issued within 3 years
from the due date for furnishing of annual return for the financial year to which the short -
paid/not paid tax relates to.
The due date for furnishing annual return for a financial year is 31st day of December following
the end of such financial year [Section 44 of the CGST Act]. Thus, SCN under section 73(1)
of the CGST Act can be issued within 2 years and 9 months from the due date for furnishing
of annual return for the financial year to which the short-paid/not paid tax relates to.
The SCN has been issued for the period between 01.07.2017 to 31.12.2017 which falls in the
financial year (FY) 2017-18. Due date for furnishing annual return for the FY 2017-18 is
31.12.2018 and 3 years’ period from due date of filing annual return lapses on 31.12.2021.
Thus, SCN under section 73(1) ought to have been issued latest by 30.09.2021. Since in the
given case, the notice has been issued on 31.01.2021, notice is not time-barred.
(b) Section 90 of the CGST Act explains the liability of partners of firm to pay tax as under: -
Partners of the firm jointly and severally liable to pay any tax, interest or penalty of the firm:
Notwithstanding any contract to the contrary and any other law for the time being in force, where
any firm is liable to pay any tax, interest or penalty under this Act, the firm and each of the partners
of the firm shall, jointly and severally, be liable for such payment.
Retiring partner liable to pay any tax, interest or penalty of the firm due up to the date of his
retirement: Where any partner retires from the firm, he or the firm, shall intimate the date of
retirement of the said partner to the Commissioner by a notice in that behalf in writing and such
partner shall be liable to pay tax, interest or penalty due up to the date of his retirement whether
determined or not, on that date.
However, if no such intimation is given within 1 month from the date of retirement, the liability of
such partner shall continue until the date on which such intimation is received by the Commissioner.
12

(c) The Customs Tariff has a set of six Rules for Interpretation of the Tariff Schedule and three General
Explanatory Notes. The six Rules of Interpretation and three General Explanatory Notes are
integral part of the Tariff Schedule. The purpose of their inclusion in Customs Tariff is to
standardize the manner in which the nomenclature in the schedule is to be interpreted so as to
reduce classification disputes.
Rule 4 of the Rules of Interpretation is called as akin rule. This rule lays down that goods which
cannot be classified in accordance with rules 1, 2 and 3 of the Rules of Interpretation shall be
classified under the heading appropriate to the goods to which they are most akin. In other words,
akin rule’ is a residual rule which is to be applied when classification is not possible by applying
any of the earlier rules. It is a rule of last resort.
6. (a) (i) The procedure for amendment of registration are contained in section 28 read with rule 19 of
CGST Rules. The significant aspects of the same are discussed hereunder:
1. Where there is any change in the particulars furnished in registration application/UIN
application, registered person shall submit an application in prescribed manner, within
15 days of such change, along with documents relating to such change at the Common
Portal.
2. In case of amendment of core fields of information, the proper officer may, on the basis
of information furnished or as ascertained by him, approve or reject amendments in the
registration particulars in the prescribed manner. Such amendment shall take effect
from the date of occurrence of event warranting such amendment.
3. However, where change relates to non-core fields of information, registration certificate
shall stand amended upon submission of the application for amendment on the Common
Portal.
4. Where a change in the constitution of any business results in change of P AN of a
registered person, the said person shall apply for fresh registration. The reason for the
same is that GSTIN is PAN based. Any change in PAN would warrant a new registration.
(ii) (1) The Board may, on the recommendations of the GST Council, issue orders or
instructions or directions fixing monetary limits for regulating filing of appeal or
application by the CGST officer.
(2) Non-filing of appeal/application by a CGST officer on account of such monetary limits
fixed by the Board shall not preclude such officer from filing appeal or application in any
other case involving the same or similar issues or questions of law.
(3) No person, who is a party in application or appeal can contend that the CGST Officer
has acquiesced in the decision on the disputed issue by not filing an appeal or
application (on account of monetary limits).
(4) The Appellate Tribunal or Court hearing such appeal or application shall have regard to
circumstances for non-filing of appeal or application by the CGST officer on account of
monetary limits fixed by the Board.
(b) During the course of any enquiry under this Act, the duly empowered officer can have access to
any business premises, which may be required for the purpose of such enquiry. During such
access, the officers can inspect the books of accounts, documents, com puters, computer
programs, computer software and such other things as may be required.
13

It is the duty of the persons in charge of such premises to furnish the required documents. Similarly,
the persons in charge of business premises are also duty bound to furnish such documents to the
audit party deputed by the proper officer or the Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant, who has
been deputed by the Commissioner to carry out special audit. The following records are covered
by this provision and are to be produced, if called for.
(i) the records prepared and maintained by the registered person and declared to the proper
officer in the prescribed manner.
(ii) trial balance or its equivalent.
(iii) statements of annual financial accounts, duly audited.
(iv) cost audit report, if any.
(v) the income - tax audit report, if any.
(vi) any other relevant record.
(c) The facts of the case are similar to the case of BPL Display Devices Ltd. v. CCEx., Ghaziabad
(2004) 174 ELT 5 (SC) wherein the Supreme Court has held that the benefit of the notifications
cannot be denied in respect of goods which are intended for use for manufacture of the final product
but cannot be so used due to shortage or leakage.
The Apex Court has held that no material distinction can be drawn between loss on account of
leakage and loss on account of damage. The benefit of said exemption cannot be denied as inputs
were intended for use in the manufacture of final product but could not be so used due to
shortage/leakage/damage. It has been clarified by the Supreme Court that words “for use” have
to be construed to mean “intended for use”.
Therefore, the importer can claim the benefit of the notification in respect of the entire lot of the
inputs imported including those that were damaged in transit.
14

For more visit - https://cablogindia.com/
Test Series: August, 2018
MOCK TEST PAPER - 1

Note:
note.
(iii) All questions should be answered on the basis of position of (i) GST law as amended up to 30th April,
30th April, 2018.
1. (a) Manoharlal Company Ltd. of Bengaluru is a manufacturer and registered supplier of machine. It
has provided the following details for the month of November, 2017.
Details of GST paid on inward supplies during the month:
Items GST paid (Rs.)
Health insurance of factory employees. 20,000
Raw materials for which invoice has been received and GST has also been paid
for full amount but only 50% of material has been received, remaining 50% will 18,000
be received in next month.
Work contractor’s service used for installation of plant and machinery. 12,000
Purchase of manufacturing machine directly sent to job worker’s premises under
50,000
challan.
Purchase of car used by director for the business meetings only. 25,000
Outdoor catering service availed for business meetings. 8,000
Manoharlal Company Ltd. also provides service of hiring of machines along with man power for
operation. As per trade practice machines are always hired out along with operators and also
operators are supplied only when machines are hired out.
Receipts on outward supply (exclusive of GST) for the month of November, 2017 are as follows:
Items Receipts (Rs.)
Hiring receipts for machine 5,25,000
Service charges for supply of man power operators 2,35,000
Assume all the transactions are inter State and the rates of IGST to be as under:
(i) Sale of machine 5%
(ii) Service of hiring of machine 12%
1
© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India Telegram - https://t.me/charteredaccountantsguide

(iii) Supply of man power operator service 18%

Compute the amount of input tax credit available and also the net GST payable for the month of
November 2017 by giving necessary explanations for treatment of various items.
Note: Opening balance of input tax credit is Nil. (10 Marks)
(b) Determine the place of supply for the following independent cases under the IGST Act, 2017:
(i) Mega Events, an event management company at Kolkata, organises two award functions for
Shagun Jewellers of Chennai (Registered in Chennai) at New Delhi and at Singapore.
(ii) Crown Planners (Bengaluru) is hired by Dr. Banta (unregistered person based in Kochi) to
plan and organise his son's wedding at Mumbai.
Will your answer be different if the wedding is to take place at Malaysia? (5 Marks)
(c) Ganesh Enterprises, India imported a machine costing US $ 17,000 from Sheraton Corp., US
through a vessel. Determine the assessable value of the said machine under the Customs Act,
1962 with the help of the additional information given below:
US $
(i) Transport charges from the factory of Sheraton Corp. to the port for shipment 850
(ii) Freight charges from US to India 1,700
(iii) Handling charges paid for loading the machine in the ship 85
(iv) Buying commission paid by Ganesh Enterprises 85
(v) Exchange rate to be considered: 1$ = Rs. 60
(vi) Actual insurance charges paid are not ascertainable (5 Marks)
2. (a) Niwas Sadan Charitable Trust is registered under section 12AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It
owns and manages a temple located at Mathura meant for general public. The temple compound
has residential dwellings, rooms, Kalyan Mandapam, Halls and shops. It provides the following
information relating to supply of its services for the month of August 2017. You are required to
compute the total taxable value of supply for the month of August 2017 assuming that the given
amounts are exclusive of GST:-
Rs.
Renting of residential dwellings for use as a residence 18,00,000
Renting of rooms for pilgrims (Charges per day Rs. 1,200) 8,00,000
Renting of rooms for devotees (Charges per day Rs. 750) 6,00,000
Renting of kalyana mandapam (Charges per day Rs. 15,000) 12,00,000
Renting of halls (Charges per day Rs. 7,500) 10,75,000
Renting of shops for business (Charges per month Rs. 9,500) 4,75,000
Renting of shops for business (Charges per month Rs. 12,000) 7,50,000
(7 Marks)
(b) Cool Trade Links Pvt. Ltd. is a registered manufacturer of premium ceiling fans. It sells its fans
exclusively through distributors appointed across the country. The maximum retail price (MRP)
printed on the package of a fan is Rs. 10,000. The company sells the ceiling fans to distributors
at Rs. 7,000 per fan (exclusive of applicable taxes). The applicable rate of GST on ceiling fans is
18%.

The stock is dispatched to the distributors on quarterly basis - stock for a quarter being dispatched in
the second week of the month preceding the relevant quarter. However, additional stock is
dispatched at any point of the year if the company receives a requisition to that effect from any of its
distributors. The company charges Rs. 1,000 per fan from distributors towards packing expenses.
The company has a policy to offer a discount of 10% (per fan) on fans supplied to the distributors
for a quarter, if the distributors sell 500 fans in the preceding quarter. The discount is offered on
the price at which the fans are sold to the distributors (excluding all charges and taxes).
The company appoints Gupta Sales as a distributor on 1st April and dispatches 750 fans on
8th April as stock for the quarter April-June. Gupta Sales places a purchase order of 1,000 fans
with the company for the quarter July-September. The order is dispatched by the company on
10th June and the same is received by the distributor on 18 th June. The distributor makes the
payment for the fans on 26 th June and avails applicable input tax credit. The distributor reports
sales of 700 fans for the quarter April-June and 850 fans for the quarter July-September.
Examine the scenario with reference to section 15 of the CGST Act, 2017 and compute the taxable
value of fans supplied by Cool Trade Links Pvt. Ltd. to Gupta Sales for the quarter July-September.
Note: The supplier and the recipient of supply are not related and price is the sole consideration
for the supply. Make suitable assumptions, wherever necessary. (8 Marks)
(c) Discuss briefly the similarities and differences between Advance Authorisation(AA) and DFIA (Duty
Free Import Authorisation) Schemes. (5 Marks)
OR
Indicate five benefits available to "Status Holders" under the reward scheme of Foreign Trade
Policy 2015-2020. There is no need to define the term "status holder". (5 Marks)
3. (a) Maahi Ltd. of Bhopal (Madhya Pradesh) is a supplier of machinery. Maahi Ltd. has supplied
machinery to ABC Enterprises in Indore (Madhya Pradesh) on 1 st October, 2017. The invoice for
supply has been issued on 1 st October, 2017. Maahi Ltd. and ABC Enterprise are not related and
price is the sole consideration for the supply.
Following information is provided:
Basic price of machinery excluding all taxes is Rs. 20,00,000. In addition to the basic price, Maahi
Ltd. has collected the design and engineering charges of Rs. 10,000 and loading charges of
Rs. 20,000 for the machinery.
Maahi Ltd. provides 1 year mandatory warranty for the machinery on payment of additional charges
of Rs. 1,00,000.
Maahi Ltd. has collected consultancy charges in relation to pre-installation planning of
Rs. 10,000 and freight and insurance charges from place of removal to buyer's premises of
Rs. 20,000.
Maahi Ltd. received subsidy of Rs. 50,000 from Central Government for supplying the machinery
to backward region since receiver was located in a backward region. Maahi Ltd. also received
Rs. 50,000 from the joint venture partner of ABC Enterprises for making timely supply of machinery
to the recipient.
A cash discount of 1% on the basic price of the machinery is offered at the time of supply, if ABC
Enterprises agrees to make the payment within 30 days of the receipt of the machinery at his
premises. Discount @ 1% was given to ABC Enterprises as it agreed to make the payment within
30 days.
The machinery attracts CGST and SGST @ 18% (9% + 9%) and IGST @18%.
Compute the CGST and SGST or IGST payable, as the case may be, on the machinery. (10 Marks)

(b) Determine the value of supply and the GST liability, to be collected and paid by the owner, with the
following particulars:
Rs.
Rent of the commercial building 18,00,000
Maintenance charges collected by local society from the owner and reimbursed
2,50,000
by the tenant
Owner intends to charge GST on refundable advance, as GST is applicable on
6,00,000
advance
Municipal taxes paid by the owner 3,00,000
Rent and maintenance charges are exclusive of GST.
GST rates applicable on renting of business premises is as follows:
CGST 9%
SGST 9%
Provide suitable explanations where required. (5 Marks)
(c) Shyam Lal has imported goods from Germany and is finally re-assessed u/s 18(2) of the Customs
Act, 1962 for two such consignments. Particulars are as follows:
Date of provisional assessment 12th December, 2017
Date of final re-assessment 2nd February, 2018
Duty demand for 1st consignment Rs. 1,80,000
Refund for the 2nd consignment Rs. 4,20,000
Date of refund made by the department 28th April, 2018
Date of payment of duty demanded 5th February, 2018
Determine the interest payable and receivable, if any, by Shyam Lal on the final re-assessment of
the two consignments, with suitable notes thereon. (5 Marks)
4. (a) (i) Alpha Pvt. Ltd., Pune provides house-keeping services. The company supplies its services
exclusively through an e-commerce website owned and managed by Clean Indya Pvt. Ltd.,
Pune. The turnover of Alpha Pvt. Ltd. in the current financial year is Rs. 18 lakh.
Advise Alpha Pvt. Ltd. as to whether they are required to obtain GST registration. Will your
advice be any different if Alpha Pvt. Ltd. sells readymade garments exclusively through the
e-commerce website owned and managed by Clean Indya Pvt. Ltd.? (6 Marks)
(ii) LMN Enterprises, Kanpur started trading in ayurvedic medicines from July 1, 20XX. Its
turnover exceeded Rs. 20 lakh on October 3, 20XX. The firm applied for registration on
October 31, 20XX and was issued registration certificate on November 5, 20XX.
Examine whether any revised invoice can be issued in the given scenario. If the answer to
the first question is in affirmative, determine the period for which the revised invoices can be
issued as also the last date upto which the same can be issued. (4 Marks)
(b) Discuss briefly provisions of CGST Act, 2017 regarding questions for which advance ruling can be
sought. (5 Marks)
(c) Alpha Corporation has imported goods and the following particulars are available for claiming duty
drawback under sections 74 & 75 of Customs Act, 1962:
(i) Custom duty has been paid on goods imported for use and have been out Rs. 14,00,000
of customs control for 14 months
(ii) Baadshah exports manufactured goods having FOB value of Rs. 86,000.
Rate of duty drawback on FOB value of exports 40%
Market value of the export product Rs. 96,000

Determine duty drawback with explanations in the above cases. (5 Marks)

5. (a) (i) Richmond has self-assessed tax liability under IGST Act, 2017, as Rs. 80,000. He fails to pay
the tax within 30 days from the due date of payment of such tax.
Determine the interest and penalty payable by him explaining the provisions of law, with the
following particulars available from his records:
Date of collection of tax 18th December, 2017
Date of payment of tax 26th February, 2018
No Show Cause Notice (SCN) has been issued to him so far, while he intends to
discharge his liability, even before it is issued to him, on the assumption that no penalty is
leviable on him as payment is made before issue of SCN. (4 Marks)
(ii) Tripathi, registered under the CGST Act, 2017 has made a breach in payment of tax
amounting to Rs. 6,100. Assessing Authority has imposed a penalty as per law applicable to
the breach. Invoking the provisions of section 126, Tripathi argues that it is a minor breach
and therefore, no penalty is imposable.
In another instance, Tripathi has omitted certain details in documentation that is not easily
rectifiable. This has occurred due to the gross negligence of his accountant and he makes a
plea that he was unaware of it and therefore no penalty should be levied.
Tripathi voluntarily writes accepting a major procedural lapse from his side and requests the
officer to condone the lapse as the loss caused to the revenue was not significant.
Also a lapse on the part of Tripathi has no specific penalty provision under the CGST Act,
2017. He is very confident that no penalty should be levied without a specific provision under
the Act.
Discuss, what action may be taken by the Assessing Authority under law for each of the above
breaches. (6 Marks)
(b) With reference to the provisions of CGST Act, 2017, explain the liability of partners of firm to pay
tax? (5 Marks)
(c) Write a brief note on rule 1 of the Rules of Interpretation of the First Schedule to Customs Tariff
Act, 1975. (5 Marks)
6. (a) (i) What is the validity period of the registration certificate issued to a casual taxable person and
non- resident taxable person? (4 Marks)
(ii) With reference to the provisions of section 120 of the CGST Act, 2017, list the cases in which
appeal is not to be filed. (6 Marks)
(b) Discuss briefly the procedure for issue of adjudication order under section 74(9) & (11) and the
time limit for passing adjudication order under section 74(10) of the CGST Act, 2017. (5 Marks)
(c) An importer imported certain inputs for manufacture of final product. A small portion of the imported
inputs were damaged in transit and could not be used in the manufacture of the final product. An
exemption notification was in force providing customs duty exemption in respect of specified raw
Briefly examine with the help of a decided case law whether the importer could claim the benefit of
the aforesaid notification in respect of the entire lot of the imported inputs including those that were
damaged in transit. (5 Marks)

Test Series: August, 2018
MOCK TEST PAPER - 1

SUGGESTED ANSWERS
Tax Rules, 2017 have been referred to as CGST, IGST, CGST Act, IGST Act a nd CGST Rules respectively.
1. (a) Computation of net GST payable by Manohar lal Company Ltd.
Particulars GST payable
(Rs.)
Gross GST liability [Refer working note (2) below] 91,200
Less: Input tax credit [Refer working note (1) below] 62,000
Net GST liability 29,200
Working Notes:
(1) Computation of Input Tax Credit (ITC) available with Manohar lal Company Ltd. in the
month of November 2017
Particulars GST (Rs.)
Health insurance of factory employees [Note – 1] Nil
Raw material received in factory [Note – 2] Nil
Work’s contractor’s service used for installation of plant and machinery 12,000
[Note -3]
Manufacturing machinery directly sent to job worker’s premises under 50,000
challan [Note -4]
Purchase of car used by director for business meetings only [Note -5] Nil
Outdoor catering service availed for business meetings [Note -6] Nil
Total ITC available 62,000
Notes:
1. ITC of health insurance is blocked in the given case since said services are not notified
by Government as obligatory for employer to provide to its employees under any law -
in terms of section 17(5)(b)(iii) of the CGST Act, 2017.
2. Where the goods against an invoice are received in lots/instalments, ITC is allowed upon
receipt of the last lot/instalment vide first proviso to section 16(2) of the CGST Act, 2017.
Therefore, Manohar lal Company Ltd. will be entitled to ITC of raw materials on receipt
of second instalment in December, 2017.

3. Section 17(5)(c) of CGST Act, 2017 provides that ITC on works contract services is
blocked when supplied for construction of immovable property (other than plant and
machinery) except when the same is used for further supply of works contract service.
Though in this case, the works contract service is not used for supply of works contract
service, ITC thereon will be allowed since such services are being used for installation
of plant and machinery.
4. ITC on capital goods directly sent to job worker’s premises under challan is allowed in
terms of section 19(5) of CGST Act, 2017 read with rule 45(1) of CGST Rules, 2017.
5. Section 17(5)(a) of CGST Act, 2017 provides that ITC on motor vehicles is allowed only
when the same are used:
(1) for making taxable supply of- (i) further supply of such vehicles, (ii) transportation
of passengers, (iii) imparting training on driving, flying, navigating such v ehicles
and
(2) for transportation of goods.
Since Manohar lal Company Ltd is a supplier of machine and it does not use the car for
transportation of goods, ITC thereon will not be available.
6. Section 17(5)(b)(i) of CGST Act, 2017 provides that ITC on outdoor catering is blocked
except where the same is used for making further supply of outdoor catering or as an
element of a taxable composite or mixed supply.
Since Manohar lal Company Ltd is a supplier of machine, ITC thereon will not be
available.
(2) Computation of gross GST liability
Value received Rate of GST GST payable
(Rs.) (Rs.)
Hiring receipts for machine 5,25,000 12% 63,000
Service charges for supply of 2,35,000 12% 28,200
manpower operators
Gross GST liability 91,200
Note:
Since machine is always hired out along with operators and operators are supplied only when
the machines are hired out, it is a case of composite supply, wherein the principal supply is
the hiring out of machines [Section 2(30) of the CGST Act, 2017 read with s ection 2(90) of
that Act]. Therefore, service of supply of manpower operators will also be taxed at the rate
applicable for hiring out of machines (principal supply), which is 12%, in terms of section 8(a)
of the CGST Act, 2017.
(b) (i) When service by way of organization of an event is provided to a registered person, place
of supply is the location of recipient in terms of section 12(7)(a)(i) of IGST Act, 2017.
Since, in the given case, the award functions at New Delhi and Singapore are organized for
Shagun Jewellers (registered in Chennai), place of supply in both the cases is the location of
Shagun Jewellers i.e., Chennai.
(ii) As per section 12(7)(a)(ii) of IGST Act, 2017, when service by way of organization of an event
is provided to an unregistered person, the place of supply is the location where the event is
actually held and if the event is held outside India, the place of supply is the location of
recipient.

Since, in the given case, the service recipient [Dr. Banta] is unregistered and event is held in
India, place of supply is the location where the event is actually held i.e., Mumbai.
However, if the wedding is to take place outside India [Malaysia], the place of supply is the
location of recipient, i.e. Kochi.
(c) Computation of assessable value of the imported machine
Particulars US $
Cost of the machine at the factory 17,000.00
Add: Transport charges up to port 850.00
Add: Handling charges at the port 85.00
FOB 17,935.00
Add: Freight charges up to India 1,700.00
Add: Insurance charges @ 1.125% of FOB [Note 1] 201.77
CIF 19,836.77
CIF in Indian rupees @ Rs. 60/ per $ Rs. 11,90,206.13
Assessable Value (rounded off) Rs.11,90,206
Notes:
(1) Insurance charges have been included @ 1.125% of FOB value of the machine [Third proviso
to rule 10(2) of the Customs Valuation (Determination of Value of Imported Goods) Rules,
2007].
(2) Buying commission is not included in the assessable value [Rule 10(1)(a)(i) of the Customs
Valuation (Determination of Value of Imported Goods) Rules, 2007].
2. (a) Renting of precincts of a religious place meant for general public, owned/managed by, inter alia,
an entity registered as a charitable trust under section 12AA of the Income-tax Act are exempt vide
Notification No. 12/2017 CT (R) dated 28.06.2017 /Notification No. 9/2017 IT (R) dated
28.06.2017[exemption notification]. However, exemption is not available if:
(i) charges for rented rooms are Rs. 1,000 per day or more;
(ii) charges for rented community halls, Kalyan mandapam, open area are Rs.10,000 per day or
more;
(iii) charges for rented shops are Rs. 10,000 per month or more.
In view of the aforesaid provisions, value of supply of Niwas Sadan Charitable Trust for
August, 2017 has been computed as under:
Computation of value of supply of Niwas Sadan Charitable Trust for August, 2017
Particulars Amount (Rs.)
Renting of residential dwellings for use as residence Nil
[Exempt vide exemption notification]
Renting of rooms for pilgrims 8,00,000
[Since charges per day are not below Rs. 1,000]
Renting of rooms for devotees Nil
[Since charges per day are below Rs. 1,000]
Renting of Kalyana Mandapam 12,00,000
[Since charges per day are not below Rs. 10,000]
Renting of halls Nil
3

[Since charges per day are below Rs. 10,000]

Renting of shops for business Nil
[Since charges per month are below Rs. 10,000]
Renting of shops for business 7,50,000
[Since charges per month are not below Rs. 10,000]
Value of taxable supply 27,50,000
(b) Section 15(3)(a) of the CGST Act allows discounts to be deducted from the value of taxable supply
if the same is given before or at the time of the supply and if such discount has been duly recorded
in the invoice issued in respect of such supply. In other words, pre-supply discounts recorded in
invoices are allowed as deduction.
Further, post supply discounts are also allowed as deduction from the value of supply under section
15(3)(b) of the CGST Act if-
(i) such discount is established in terms of an agreement entered into at or before the time of
such supply and specifically linked to relevant invoices; and
(ii) input tax credit as is attributable to the discount on the basis of document issued by the
supplier has been reversed by the recipient of the supply.
In the given case, Gupta Sales is entitled for 10% discount on fans supplied by Cool Trade Links
Pvt. Ltd. for the quarter July-September as it has sold more than 500 fans in the preceding quarter
April-June. However, since the entire stock for the quarter July-September has already been
despatched by Cool Trade Links Pvt. Ltd. in the month of June, the discounts on the fans supplied
to Gupta Sales for the quarter July-September will be a post-supply discount.
Such post-supply discount will be allowed as a deduction from the value of supply since the
discount policy was known before the time of such supply and the discount can be specifically
linked to relevant invoices (invoices pertaining to fans supplied to Gupta Sales for the quarter July-
September) provided Gupta Sales reverses the input tax credit attributable to the discount on the
basis of document issued by Cool Trade Links Pvt. Ltd.
The value of supply will thus, be computed as under:
Particulars Amount
(Rs.)
Price at which the fans are supplied to Prakash Sales [Note 1] 7,000
Add: Packing expenses [Note 2] 1,000
Less: Discount [Note 3] (700)
Value of taxable supply of one unit of fan 7,300
Value of taxable supply of fans for the quarter July-September 73,00,000
[Rs. 7,300 x 1,000]
Notes:
(1) The value of a supply is the transaction value, which is the price actually paid or payable for
the said supply, in terms of section 15(1) of the CGST Act.
(2) The value of supply includes incidental expenses like packing charges in terms of sec tion
15(2)(c) of the CGST Act.
(3) Since all the conditions specified in section 15(3)(b) of the CGST Act have been fulfilled, the
post-supply discount will be allowed as deduction from the value of supply presuming that

Gupta Sales has reversed the input tax credit attributable to such discount on the basis of
document issued by Cool Trade Links Pvt. Ltd. The input tax credit to be reversed will work
out to be Rs. 1.26 lakh [1,000 x (7,000 x 10%) x 18%].
(c) Similarity: In both the schemes, duty free import of inputs, oil and catalyst required for export
products is permitted.
Differences:
(i) Advance Authorisation (AA) is not transferable. DFIA is transferable after export obligation is
fulfilled.
(ii) While AA requires 15% value addition, DFIA requires minimum 20% value addition.
(iii) AA is available to gem and jewellery sector, but DFIA is not.
(iv) DFIA cannot be issued where Standard Input Output Norms (SION) prescribe actual user
condition.
(v) AA can be issued even if SION for the product to be exported is not fixed. DIFA can be issued
only if SION has been fixed for the product to be exported.
OR
The benefits available to Status holders are as under:
(a) Authorization and custom clearances for both imports and exports on self-declaration basis.
(b) Fixation of Input Output Norms (SION) on priority i.e. within 60 days.
(c) Exemption from compulsory negotiation of documents through banks. The remittance
receipts, however, would continue to be received through banking channels.
(d) Exemption from furnishing of Bank Guarantee for Schemes under FTP unless otherwise
specified.
(e) Two Star Export Houses and above are permitted to establish export warehouses.
(f) Three Star and above Export House shall be entitled to get benefit of Accredited Clients
Programme (ACP) as per the guidelines of CBEC.
[Note : Any of the above five points may be mentioned.]
3. (a) Computation of GST payable
Particulars Rs.
Basic Price of the machinery [Note 1] 20,00,000
Add: Design and engineering charges [Note 1] 20,000
Loading charges [Note 1] 10,000
Warranty cost [Note 2] 1,00,000
Consultancy charges in relation to pre-installation planning [Note 3] 10,000
Freight and insurance charges [Note 2] 20,000
Subsidy received from Central Government [Note 4] Nil
Receipts from Joint Venture of ABC Enterprises [Note 4] 50,000
Less: 1% discount on basic price = Rs. 20,00,000 x 1% [Note 5] (20,000)
Value of supply 21,90,000
CGST @ 9% [Note 6] 1,97,100
SGST @ 9% [Note 6] 1,97,100

Notes:
1. In terms of section 15(1) of the CGST Act, 2017, the value of the supply is the transaction
value i.e., price actually paid or payable for the machinery by ABC Enterprises.
Design and engineering charges are includible in the value of supply as any amount charged
for anything done by the supplier in respect of the supply of goods at the time of, or before
delivery of goods is so includible in terms of section 15(2)(c) of CGST Act, 2017.
Further, loading charges being incidental expenses charged by the supplier to the recipient
of supply, are includible in the value as per section 15(2)(c) of the CGST Act, 2017.
2. Supply of machinery (goods) with supply of ancillary services like warranty and freight and
insurance is a composite supply, the principle supply of which is the supply of machinery.
[Section 2(30) of the CGST Act, 2017 read with section 2(90) of that Act]. Thus, value of such
ancillary supply is includible in the value of composite supply.
3. Any amount charged for anything done by the supplier in respect of the supply of goods at
the time of, or before delivery of goods is includible in the value of supply in terms of section
15(2)(c) of CGST Act, 2017.
4. Subsidies provided by the Central Government and State Governments are not includible in
the value of supply in terms of section 15(2)(e) of the CGST Act, 2017. However, subsidy
directly linked to the price received from a non-Government body is includible in the value in
terms of section 15.
5. Cash discount has been given to ABC Enterprises upfront at the time of supply and thus would
have been recorded in the invoice and hence, the same is excluded from the value of supply
in terms of section 15(3)(a) of the CGST Act, 2017.
6. In the given case-
• the location of the supplier is in Bhopal (Madhya Pradesh); and
• the place of supply of machinery is the location of the machinery at the time at which the
movement of the same terminates for delivery to the recipient i.e., Indore (Madhya
Pradesh) vide section 10(1)(a) of IGST Act, 2017.
Therefore, as per section 8(1) of IGST Act, 2017, the given supply is an intra-State supply as the
location of the supplier and the place of supply are in the same State. Thus, the supply will be
leviable to CGST and SGST.
(b)
Rent of the commercial buiding 18,00,000
Maintenance charges collected by the local society from the owner and 2,50,000
reimbursed by the tenant [ Note-1]
Refundable advance [Note-2] Nil
Municipal taxes paid by the owner [Note-3] Nil
CGST @ 9% 1,84,500
SGST @ 9% 1,84,500
Notes:-
1. Being reimbursed by the tenant, such charges ultimately form part of the rent paid by the
tenant to the owner and thus, will form part of the value.

2. Being refundable, the advance is in the nature of security deposit which does not constitute
consideration in terms of section 2(31) of the CGST Act, 2017 and thus, is not includible in
the value.
3. Being an expenditure incurred by the supplier, the same is not includible in the value,
assuming that such taxes are not charged to the recipient.
(c) As per section 18(3) of the Customs Act, 1962, an importer is liable to pay interest at the rate of
15% p.a. (Notification No. 33/2016-Cus. (NT) dated 01.03.2016), on any amount payable
consequent to the re-assessment order from the first day of the month in which the duty is
provisionally assessed till the date of payment.
Therefore, in the given case, Shyam Lal is liable to pay following interest in respect of
1st consignment:
= Rs. 1,80,000 × 15% × 67/365
= Rs. 4,956 (rounded off)
If any amount refundable consequent to the re-assessment order is not refunded within 3 months
from date of re-assessment of duty, interest is payable to importer on unrefunded amount a t the
specified rate till the date of refund of such amount in terms of section 18(4) of the Customs Act,
1962.
Since in the given case, refund has been made (28.04.2018) within 3 months from the date of re -
assessment of duty (02.02.2018), interest is not payable to Shyam Lal on duty refunded in respect
of 2nd consignment.
4. (a) (i) As per section 22 of the CGST Act every supplier of goods or services or both is required to
obtain registration in the State/ Union territory from where he makes the taxable supply if his
aggregate turnover exceeds Rs. 20 lakh [Rs. 10 lakh in case of specified Special Category
States] in a financial year.
However, section 24 of the said Act enlists certain categories of persons who are mandatorily
required to obtain registration, irrespective of their turnover. Persons who supply goods or
services or both through such electronic commerce operator (ECO), who is required to collect
tax at source under section 52, is one such person specified under clause (ix) of section 24.
However, where the ECO is liable to pay tax on behalf of the suppliers of services under a
notification issued under section 9(5), the suppliers of such services are entitled for threshold
exemption.
Further, persons making supplies of services, other than supplies specified under section
9(5) through an ECO who is required to collect tax at source under section 52, and having an
aggregate turnover, to be computed on all India basis, not exceeding an amount of Rs. 20
lakh [Rs. 10 lakh for specified special category States] in a financial year, have been
exempted from obtaining registration vide Notification No. 65/2017 CT dated 15.11.2017.
Section 2(45) of the CGST Act defines ECO as any person who owns, operates or manages
digital or electronic facility or platform for electronic commerce. Electronic commerce is
defined under section 2(44) to mean the supply of goods or services or both, including digital
products over digital or electronic network. Since Clean Indya Pvt. Ltd. owns and manages
a website for e commerce where both goods and services are supplied, it will be classified as
an ECO under section 2(45).
Notification No. 17/2017 CT (R) dated 28.06.2017 issued under section 9(5) specifies services
by way of house-keeping, except where the person supplying such service through ECO is
liable for registration under section 22(1), as one such service where the ECO is liable to pay
tax on behalf of the suppliers.
7

In the given case, Alpha Pvt. Ltd. provides house-keeping services through an ECO. It is
presumed that Clean Indya is an ECO which is required to collect tax at source under section
52. However, house-keeping services provided by Alpha Pvt. Ltd., which is not liable for
registration under section 22(1) as its turnover is less than Rs. 20 lakh, is a service notified
under section 9(5). Thus, Alpha Pvt. Ltd. will be entitled for threshold exemption for
registration and will not be required to obtain registration even though it supplies services
through ECO.
In the second case, Alpha Pvt. Ltd. sells readymade garments through ECO. Such supply
cannot be notified under section 9(5) as only supplies of services are notified under that
section. Therefore, in the second case, Alpha Pvt. Ltd. will not be entitled for threshold
exemption and will have to compulsorily obtain registration in terms of section 24(ix).
(ii) As per section 31(3)(a) of the CGST Act, a registered person may, within one month from the
date of issuance of certificate of registration, issue a revised invoice against the invoice
already issued during the period beginning with the effective date of registration till the date
of issuance of certificate of registration to him.
Further, rule 10(2) of CGST Rules lays down that the registration shall be effective from the
date on which the person becomes liable to registration where the application for registration
has been submitted within a period of 30 days from such date.
In the given case, LMN Enterprises has applied for registration within 30 days of becoming
liable for registration and the registration has been granted. Thus, the effective date of
registration is the date on which LMN Enterprises became liable for registration i.e., October
3, 20XX. Therefore, since in the given case there is a time lag between the effective date of
registration (October 3, 20XX) and the date of grant of certificate of registration (November
5, 20XX), revised invoices can be issued. The same can be issued for supplies made during
this intervening period i.e., for the period beginning with October 3, 20XX till November 5,
20XX. Further, the revised invoices can be issued for the said period till December 5, 20XX.
(b) As per section 97(2) of CGST Act, 2017, advance ruling can be sought for the following questions: -
(a) classification of any goods or services or both
(b) applicability of a notification issued under the CGST Act
(c) determination of time and value of supply of goods or services or both
(d) admissibility of input tax credit of tax paid or deemed to have been paid
(e) determination of the liability to pay tax on any goods or services or both
(f) whether applicant is required to be registered
(g) whether any particular activity with respect to any goods and/or services, amounts to/results
in a supply of goods and/or services, within the meaning of that term.
Note: Any of the four points may be mentioned.
(c) (i) As per section 74(2) of Customs Act, 1962 read with Notification No. 19/65 Cus dated
06.02.1995 as amended, 65% of import duty is to be paid as duty drawback if goods are used
after importation and have been out of customs control for export for a period of more than
12 months but not more than 15 months.
Therefore, amount of duty drawback = Rs. 14,00,000 x 65% = Rs. 9,10,000
(ii) Amount of duty drawback = Rs. 86,000 x 40% = Rs. 34,400
However, the drawback amount should not exceed one third of the market price of the export
product as per rule 9 of Customs & Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017.
Thus, upper limit of drawback amount = Rs. 96,000/3 = Rs. 32,000
Thus, the amount of duty drawback in the present case will be restricted to Rs. 32,000
8

5. (a) (i) Due date for payment of tax collected on 18.12.2017 is 20.01.2018. However, since tax is
actually paid on 26.02.2018, interest @ 18% p.a. is payable for the period for which the tax
remains unpaid [37 days] in terms of section 50 of CGST Act, 2017 read with Notification No.
13/2017 CT dated 28.06.2017. Amount of interest is:
= Rs. 80,000 × 18% × 37/365 = Rs. 1,460 (rounded off)
As per section 73(11) of CGST Act, 2017, where self-assessed tax/any amount collected as
tax is not paid within 30 days from due date of payment of tax, then, inter alia, option to pay
such tax before issuance of SCN to avoid penalty, is not available.
Consequently, penalty equivalent to
(i) 10% of tax, viz., Rs. 8,000 or
(ii) Rs. 10,000,
whichever is higher,
is payable in terms of section 73(9) of CGST Act, 2017. Therefore, penalty of Rs. 10,000 will
have to be paid by Richmond.
(ii) As per section 126(1) of the CGST Act, 2017, no penalty shall be leviable under the Act for
minor breaches of tax regulations. In terms of Explanation (a) to section 126(1), a breach
shall be considered as “minor breach”, if tax involved is less than Rs. 5,000. Breach made
by Tripathi is not a ‘minor breach’ since the amount involved is not less than Rs. 5,000. So,
penalty is imposable.
Any omission or mistake in documentation which is easily rectifiable and made without
fraudulent intent/gross negligence is not liable for penalty in terms of section 126(1) of the
CGST Act, 2017. Thus, penalty is imposable in the present case, since the omission in the
documentation is not easily rectifiable and has occurred due to gross negligence.
As per section 126(5) of the CGST Act, 2017, where there is a voluntary disclosure of breach,
prior to its discovery by the officer, the proper officer may consider this fact as a mitigating
factor when quantifying the penalty. Since Tripathi has voluntarily disclosed the breach of
procedural requirement to the officer, the proper officer may consider this fact as a mitigating
factor when quantifying the penalty. Therefore, the quantum of penalty will depend on the
facts and circumstances of the case.
As per section 125 of the CGST Act, 2017, when no specific penalty has been specified for
contravention of any of the provisions of the Act or any rules made there under, it shall be
liable to a penalty which may extend to Rs. 25,000. Therefore, general penalty upto
Rs. 25,000 may be imposed on Tripathi as when no specific penalty is provided for any
contravention, a general penalty may be imposed.
(b) Section 90 of the CGST Act explains the liability of partners of firm to pay tax as under: -
Partners of the firm jointly and severally liable to pay any tax, interest or penalty of the firm:
Notwithstanding any contract to the contrary and any other law for the time being in force, where
any firm is liable to pay any tax, interest or penalty under this Act, the firm and each of th e partners
of the firm shall, jointly and severally, be liable for such payment.
Retiring partner liable to pay any tax, interest or penalty of the firm due up to the date of his
retirement: Where any partner retires from the firm, he or the firm, shall intimate the date of
retirement of the said partner to the Commissioner by a notice in that behalf in writing and such
partner shall be liable to pay tax, interest or penalty due up to the date of his retirement whether
determined or not, on that date.
However, if no such intimation is given within 1 month from the date of retirement, the liability of
such partner shall continue until the date on which such intimation is received by the Commissioner.
(c) Rule 1 of the general rules for interpretation states that the titles of sections, chapters and sub-
chapters in the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 are provided for ease of reference
only. For legal purposes, classification shall be determined according to the terms of the headings
9

and any relative section or chapter notes and provided such headings or chapter notes do not
otherwise require, according to the subsequent rules.
Thus, the tiles of sections, chapters and sub-chapters cannot be used to determine classification
of a product.
6. (a) (i) In terms of section 27(1) read with proviso thereto, the certificate of registration issued to a
“casual taxable person” or a “non-resident taxable person” shall be valid for a period specified
in the application for registration or 90 days from the effective date of registration, whichever
is earlier. However, the proper officer, at the request of the said taxable person, may extend
the validity of the aforesaid period of 90 days by a further period not exceeding 90 days.
(ii) (1) The Board may, on the recommendations of the GST Council, issue orders or
instructions or directions fixing monetary limits for regulating filing of appeal or
application by the CGST officer.
(2) Non-filing of appeal/application by a CGST officer on account of such monetary limits
fixed by the Board shall not preclude such officer from filing appeal or application in any
other case involving the same or similar issues or questions of law.
(3) No person, who is a party in application or appeal can contend that the CGST Officer
has acquiesced in the decision on the disputed issue by not filing an appeal or
application (on account of monetary limits).
(4) The Appellate Tribunal or Court hearing such appeal or application shall have regard to
circumstances for non-filing of appeal or application by the CGST officer on account of
monetary limits fixed by the Board.
(b) The procedure for issue of adjudication order under section 74 of CGST Act, 2017 is as under: -
Where a show cause notice/statement is issued to a person chargeable with tax, he may furnish a
representation to the proper officer in his defence, if he is of the view that he is not so liable to pay
whole/part of the amount mentioned in the show cause notice.
The proper officer after considering the representation, if any, made by the person chargeable with
tax, pass an order determining the amount of tax, interest and penalty due from such person
[Section 74(9)].
Where any person served with an adjudication order pays the tax along with inter est payable
thereon under section 50 and a penalty equivalent to 50% of such tax within 30 days of
communication of the order, all proceedings in respect of the said notice shall be deemed to be
concluded [Section 74(11)].
As per section 74(10) of CGST Act, 2017, the proper officer shall issue the adjudication order within
5 years from the due date for furnishing of Annual Return for the financial year to which the tax not
paid/short paid/input tax credit wrongly availed/utilised relates to or within 5 year s from the date of
erroneous refund.
cannot be denied in respect of goods which are intended for use for manufacture of the final product
but cannot be so used due to shortage or leakage.
leakage and loss on account of damage. The benefit of said exemption cannot be denied as inputs
were intended for use in the manufacture of final product but could not be so used due to
10

Test Series: October, 2018
MOCK TEST PAPER - 2

Note:
note.
30th April, 2018.
1. (a) Mega Engineering Pvt. Ltd., a registered supplier, is engaged in providing expert maintenance and
repair services for large power plants that are in the nature of immovable property, situated all over
India. The company has its Head Office at Bangalore, Karnataka and branch offices in other
States. The work is done in the following manner.
- The company has self-contained mobile workshops, which are container trucks fitted out for
carrying out the repairs. The trucks are equipped with items like repair equipments,
consumables, tools, parts etc. to handle a wide variety of repair work.
- The truck is sent to the client location for carrying out the repair work. Depending upon the
repairs to be done, the equipment, consumables, tools, parts etc. are used from the stock of
such items carried in the truck.
- In some cases, a stand-alone machine is also sent to the client’s premises in such truck for
carrying out the repair work.
- The customer is billed after the completion of the repair work depending upon the nature of
the work and the actual quantity of consumables, parts etc. used in the repair work.
- Sometimes the truck is sent to the company’s own location in other State(s) from where it is
further sent to client locations for repairs.
Work out the GST liability [CGST & SGST or IGST, as the case may be] of Mega Engineering Pvt.
Ltd., Bangalore on the basis of the facts as described, read with the following data for the month
of November 2017.
S. No. Particulars Rs.
A. Truck sent to own location in Tamil Nadu
(i) Value of items contained in the truck - Rs. 3,00,000
(ii) Value of truck - Rs. 25,00,000

B. Truck sent to a client location in Tamil Nadu for carrying out

repairs. Stand- alone machine is also sent in the truck to client
location for repairs
(i) Value of items contained in the truck – Rs. 2,85,000
(ii) Value of stand-alone machine - Rs. 4,00,000
(iii) Value of truck - Rs. 20,00,000
(Billing for repairs to be done afterwards depending upon the
actual items used)
C. Truck sent to a client location in Karnataka for carrying out
repairs
(Billing for repairs to be done afterwards depending upon the
actual items used)
D. Invoices raised for repair work carried out in Tamil Nadu 70,00,000
[including the invoice for repair work done in ‘B’] -
Also, specify the document(s), if any, which need to be issued by Mega Engineering Pvt. Ltd.,
Bangalore for the above transactions.
All the given amounts are exclusive of GST, wherever applicable. Assume the rates of taxes to be
as under:
Items used for repairs
CGST – 6% SGST – 6% IGST – 12%
Container truck, Stand-alone machines
CGST – 2.5% SGST – 2.5% IGST – 5%
Works contract for repairs and maintenance of immovable property
(b) Mr. Dhiraj, an unregistered person and a resident of Pune, hires the services of M/s Nice Ltd. an
event management company registered in Delhi, for organising of the new product launch in
Bengaluru.
(i) Determine the place of supply of services provided by M/s Nice Ltd.
(ii) What would your answer be in case the product launch takes place in Bangkok?
(iii) What would your answer be in case Mr. Dhiraj is a registered person and product launches
take place in Bengaluru and Bangkok? (5 Marks)
(c) Arpan Industries Ltd., New Delhi has imported certain machine (by sea) from Japan.
From the following particulars furnished by it, work out the assessable value of the machine and
customs duty payable by Arpan Industries Ltd. with appropriate working notes:
S. No. Particulars Amount in (Rs.)
(i) CIF value of the machine 4,23,379.69
(ii) Freight incurred from port of entry to Inland Container depot 25,000.00
(iii) Unloading and handling charges paid at the place of importation 40,000.00
(iv) Designing charges paid to Consultancy firm in Mumbai 10,000.00
2

1. Basic Customs Duty leviable 10% advalorem

2. Integrated tax leviable under section 3(7) of the Customs Tariff Act,
1975 is 18%.
3. Note: Ignore GST Compensation Cess.
(5 Marks)
2. (a) Mr. Swami, a registered supplier of Chennai, has received the following amounts in respect of the
activities undertaken by him during the month ended on 30 th September, 2017:
S. No. Particulars Amount (Rs.)
(i) Amount charged for service provided to recognized sports body as 50,000
selector of national team.
(ii) Commission received as an insurance agent from insurance company. 65,000
(iii) Amount charged as business correspondent for the services provided 15,000
to the urban branch of a nationalized bank with respect to savings bank
accounts.
(iv) Service to foreign diplomatic mission located in India. 28,000
(v) Funeral services. 30,000
He received the services from unregistered goods transport agency for his business activities
relating to serial numbers (i) to (iii) above and paid freight of Rs. 45,000 (his aggregate turnover of
previous year was Rs. 9,90,000). GTA is paying tax @ 5%.
Note: All the transactions stated above are intra-State transactions and also are exclusive of GST.
You are required to calculate gross value of taxable supply on which GST is to be paid by Mr. Swami
for the month of September, 2017. Working notes should form part of your answer. (7 Marks)
(b) Deluxe Enterprises is in possession of certain capital goods and purchases more of them as per
the following particulars:
Particulars Input tax on Status of its use
capital goods
(Rs.)
Capital Goods A 12,000 Exclusively used for non-business
purpose.
Capital Goods B 24,000 Exclusively used for zero- rated
supplies.
Capital Goods C 60,000 Used both for taxable and exempt
supplies.
Capital goods D (has been exclusively 1,20,000 Now there is change in use, both for
used for 2 years for exempted supplies) taxable and exempt supplies.
Capital goods E (has been exclusively 1,80,000 Now there is change in use, both for
used for 3 years for taxable supplies). taxable and exempt supplies.
Useful life of all the above capital goods is considered as 5 years.
Apportion the input tax credit of capital goods, while being informed that aggregate value of exempt
supplies during the tax period being Rs. 6,00,000 and total turnover during the tax period being
Rs. 12,00,000. (8 Marks)
(c) Discuss briefly the similarities and differences between Advance Authorisation(AA) and DFIA (Duty
Free Import Authorisation) Schemes. (5 Marks)

OR
Indicate five benefits available to "Status Holders" under the reward scheme of Foreign Trade
Policy 2015-2020. There is no need to define the term "status holder". (5 Marks)
3. (a) Tan-Supply Pvt. Ltd. is a registered manufacturer of auto parts in Kolkata, West Bengal. The
company has a manufacturing facility registered under Factories Act, 1948 in Kolkata. It procures
its inputs indigenously from both registered and unregistered suppliers located within as well as
outside West Bengal as also imports some raw material from China.
The company reports the following details for the month of November, 2017:
Payments Rs. (in lakh) Receipts Rs. (in lakh)
Raw material 3.5 Sales 15
Consumables 1.25
Transportation charges for bringing the raw 0.70
material to factory
Salary paid to employees on rolls 5.0
Premium paid on life insurance policies taken 1.60
for specified employees
All the above amounts are exclusive of all kinds of taxes, wherever applicable. However, the
applicable taxes have also been paid by the company.
Further, following additional details are furnished by the company in respect of the payments and
receipts reported by it:
(i) Raw material amounting to Rs. 0.80 lakh is procured from Bihar and Rs. 1.5 lakh is imported
from China. Basic customs duty of Rs. 0.15 lakh, education cesses of Rs. 0.0045 lakh and
integrated tax of Rs. 0.29781 lakh are paid on the imported raw material. Remaining raw
material is procured from suppliers located in West Bengal. Out of such raw material, raw
material worth Rs. 0.30 lakh is procured from unregistered suppliers; the remaining raw
material is procured from registered suppliers. Further, raw material worth Rs. 0.05 lakh
purchased from registered supplier located in West Bengal has been destroyed due to
seepage problem in the factory and thus, could not be used in the manufacturing process.
(ii) Consumables are procured from registered suppliers located in Kolkata and include diesel
worth Rs. 0.25 lakh for running the generator in the factory.
(iii) Transportation charges comprise of Rs. 0.60 lakh paid to Goods Transport Agency (GTA) in
Kolkata and Rs. 0.10 lakh paid to horse pulled carts. GST applicable on the services of GTA
is 5%.
(iv) Life insurance policies for specified employees have been taken by the company to fulfill a
statutory obligation in this regard. The Government has notified such life insurance service
under section 17(5)(b)(iii)(A). The life insurance service provider is registered in West Bengal.
(v) The break up of sales is as under:
Sales in West Bengal – Rs. 7 lakh
Sales in States other than West Bengal – Rs. 3 lakh
Export under bond – Rs. 5 lakh
The balance of input tax credit with the company as on 1.11.2017 is:
CGST - Rs. 0.15 lakh
SGST - Rs. 0.08 lakh
4

IGST - Rs. 0.10 lakh

Compute eligible input tax credit and net GST payable [CGST, SGST or IGST, as the case may
be] by Tan-Supply Pvt. Ltd. for the month of November 2017.
Note-
(i) CGST, SGST & IGST rates to be 9%, 9% and 18% respectively, wherever applicable.
(ii) The necessary conditions for availing input tax credit have been complied with by Tan-Supply
Pvt. Ltd., wherever applicable.
(b) Element Ltd. provides you the following particulars relating to goods supplied by it to Molecule Ltd.:
Particulars Rs.
List price of the goods (exclusive of taxes and discounts). 76,000
Special packing at the request of customer to be charged to the customer. 5,000
Duty levied by local authority on the sale of such goods. 4,000
CGST and SGST charged in invoice. 14,400
Subsidy received from a NGO (The price of Rs. 76,000 given above is after
5,000
considering the subsidy)
Element Ltd. offers 3% discount of the list price of the goods which is recorded in the invoice for
the goods.
Determine the value of taxable supplies made by Element Ltd. (5 Marks)
(c) A consignment containing many items was imported by Vivek. On examination of the goods, it was
found that he had made misdeclaration in respect of all the items. You are required to indicate the
penalty imposable under section 112 of Customs Act, 1962 in each case given below. Values are
exclusive of customs duties. Basic Customs Duty is 10%, Education cesses – 3%. No other tax is
attracted on these imports.
(1) Non- prohibited dutiable goods and the value is mis-declared as Rs. 10,00,000 instead of
Rs. 11,50,000.
(2) In the case at serial number 1, if the importer pays duty and interest within 30 days from the
date of communication of the order.
(3) The value of imported goods declared is higher than the value determined by Customs. Value
determined by Customs is Rs. 15,00,000 but the value declared by Vivek is Rs. 20,00,000.
(4) The value of prohibited goods was declared as 20,00,000 and the actual value determined
was Rs. 15,00,000. You may assume that goods are other than non-prohibited dutiable goods
and prohibited goods.
(5) The imported goods are prohibited goods, which were declared by Vivek to be some other
goods valued Rs. 15,00,000 and actual value is found to be Rs. 20,00,000. (5 Marks)
4. (a) (i) Determine whether registration has to be obtained under GST in case of the following as per
provisions contained under CGST Act, 2017.
(1) Fine oils is engaged in the business of machine oil as well as petrol and diesel. The total
turnover on supply of machine oil is only Rs. 8 lakhs and in case of petrol and diesel is
Rs. 8 crores.
(2) Ramlal, an agriculturist, for supply of produce out of cultivation of land amounting to
Rs. 21 lakhs. (6 Marks)

(ii) M/s. Sahu & Co. a registered firm has filed its GST Return in GSTR-1 for the month of
February, 2018 declaring an outward supply of Rs. 300 lakhs. The return was filed within the
due date of its filing. However, on a subsequent reconciliation of the return with the books of
accounts it was found that 5 invoices having a total value of Rs. 20 lacs towards supply made
to local parties were inadvertently omitted to be reported. Sahu & Co. have approached you
for an advice as to the course of action to be adopted to rectify the omission. (4 Marks)
(b) Briefly discuss the modes of recovery of tax available to the proper officer. (5 Marks)
(c) After visiting USA for a month, Mrs. & Mr. Singla (Indian residents aged 35 and 40 years
respectively) brought to India a laptop computer valued at Rs. 60,000, used personal effects valued
at Rs. 1,20,000 and a personal computer for Rs. 54,000.
Calculate the customs duty payable by Mrs. & Mr. Singla. (5 Marks)
5. (a) (i) Examine the implications as regards the bailability and quantum of punishment on
prosecution, in respect of the following cases pertaining to the period December, 2017 under
CGST Act, 2017;
(1) 'M' collects Rs. 245 lakh as tax from its clients and deposits Rs. 241 lakh with the Central
Government. It is found that he has falsified financial records and has not maintained
proper records.
(2) 'N' collects Rs. 550 lakh as tax from its clients but deposits only Rs. 30 lakh with the
Central Government. Further, the amount of Rs. 520 lakh collected as tax is not paid to
the Government beyond 3 months from the due date of payment of tax.
What will be the implications with regard to punishment on prosecution of 'M' and 'N' for the
offences? What would be the position, if 'M' and 'N' repeat the offences?
It may be assumed that offences are proved in the court. (6 Marks)
(ii) From the details given below determine the maximum amount of fine in lieu of confiscation
leviable under section 130 of CGST, Act, 2017 on:
(1) The goods liable for confiscation.
(2) On the conveyance used for carriage of such goods.
Details are as follows:
Cost of the goods for owner before GST 15,00,000
Market Value of Goods 20,00,000
GST on such goods 3,60,000
You are also required to explain relevant legal provisions in brief. (4 Marks)
(b) State five cases where refundable amount shall be paid to the applicant, instead of being credited
to Consumer Welfare Fund under CGST Act, 2017. (5 Marks)
(c) What is the purpose of including Interpretation Rules in Customs Tariff? Do they form part of the
Tariff Schedule? Explain the Akin Rule of interpretation. (5 Marks)
6. (a) (i) Explain the provisions relating to liability for GST in case of company in liquidation (section
88 of the CGST Act, 2017). (4 Marks)
(ii) Explain briefly the provisions regarding mandatory pre-deposit to be made before filing an
appeal before Appellate Authority and Tribunal as per CGST Act, 2017. (6 Marks)
(b) Explain in what cases, assessment order passed by proper officer may be withdrawn under CGST
Act, 2017? (5 Marks)

(c) An importer imported a consignment weighing 10,000 tons. The importer filed a bill of entry for
home consumption. The Assistant Commissioner passed an order for clearance of goods and
applicable duty was paid by them. The importer thereafter found, on taking delivery from the Port
Trust Authorities i.e., before the clearance for home consumption, that only 9,000 tonnes of inputs
were available at the docks although he had paid duty for the entire 10,000 tonnes.
There was no short-landing of cargo. The short- delivery of 1,000 tonnes was also substantiated
by the Port Trust Authorities, who gave a weighment certificate to the importer.
On filing a representation to the Customs Department, the importer has been directed in writing to
justify as to which provision of the Customs Act, 1962 governs his claim for remission of duty on
the 1,000 tonnes not delivered by the Port Trust.
Examine the issue and tender your opinion as per law, giving reasons. (5 Marks)

MOCK TEST PAPER - 2

SUGGESTED ANSWERS
Tax Rules, 2017 have been referred to as CGST, IGST, CGST Act, IGST Act and CGST Rules respectively.
1. (a) Computation of GST Liability of Mega Engineering Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore for the month of
November 2017
S.No. Particulars Rs.
A. Items sent in container truck to own location in Tamil Nadu - IGST @ 36,000
12% [Note 1]
Container truck sent to own location in Tamil Nadu [Note 2] -
B. Stand-alone machine sent in container truck to client location in Tamil -
Nadu, for carrying out repairs [Note 3]
Container truck sent to client location in Tamil Nadu [Note 3] -
Items sent in container truck to client location in Tamil Nadu, for -
carrying out repairs [Note 4]
C. Container truck sent to client location in Karnataka [Note 3] -
Items sent in container truck to client location in Karnataka, for carrying -
out repairs [Note 4]
D. Invoices raised for repair work carried out in Tamil Nadu: IGST @ 18%
[Note 5 and Note 6] 12,60,000
Total GST liability 12,96,000
Notes:
(1) Movement of goods without any consideration to a ‘distinct person’ as specified in section
25(4) of the CGST Act, 2017 is deemed to be a supply in terms of Schedule I of the said Act.
The purchase value is taken as taxable value, being the open market val ue in terms of rule
28(a) of the CGST Rules 2017. (However, if the regional office is eligible to take full input tax
credit, any value may be declared in the tax invoice and that will be taken to be the open
market value in terms of the second proviso to the same rule.)
In the given case-
• the location of the supplier is in Bangalore (Karnataka); and
• the place of supply of items contained in the truck is the location of such goods at the
time at which the movement of goods terminates for delivery to the recipient i.e., Tamil
Nadu in terms of section 10(1)(a) of the IGST Act, 2017.

Therefore, the given supply of items is an inter-State supply as the location of the supplier
and the place of supply are in two different States [Section 7(1)(a) of IGST Act, 2017]. Thus,
the supply is leviable to IGST in terms of section 5(1) of the IGST Act, 2017.
Since the activity is a supply, a tax invoice is to be issued by Mega Engineering Pvt. Ltd. in
terms of section 31(1)(a) of the CGST Act, 2017 for sending the items to its own location in
Tamil Nadu.
(2) As per section 25(4) of the CGST Act, 2017, a person who has obtained more than one
registration, whether in one State or Union territory or more than one State or Union territory
shall, in respect of each such registration, be treated as ‘distinct persons’.
Schedule I to the CGST Act, 2017 specifies situations where activities are to be treated as
supply even if made without consideration. Supply of goods and/or services between ‘distinct
persons’ as specified in section 25 of the CGST Act, 2017, when made in the course or
furtherance of business is one such activity included in Schedule I under para 2.
However, in view of the GST Council’s recommendation, it has been clarified that the inter -
State movement of various modes of conveyance between ‘distinct persons’ as specified in
section 25(4), not involving further supply of such conveyance, including trucks carrying goods
or passengers or both; or for repairs and maintenance, may be treated ‘neither as a supply of
goods nor supply of service’ and therefore, will not be leviable to IGST. Applicable
CGST/SGST/IGST, however, shall be leviable on repairs and maintenance done for such
conveyance [Circular No. 1/1/2017 IGST dated 07.07.2017].
Since the activity is not a supply, tax invoice is not required to be issued by Mega Engineering
Pvt. Ltd. However, a delivery challan is to be issued by the company in terms of rule 55(1)(c)
of CGST Rules, 2017 for sending the truck to its own location in Tamil Nadu.
(3) Supply of goods without consideration is deemed to be a supply inter alia when the goods are
supplied to a ‘distinct person’. However, in this case, stand-alone machine and container
truck are moved to client location and not between ‘distinct persons’. Hence, the same will
fall outside the scope of definition of supply and will not be leviable to GST.
Here again, a delivery challan is to be issued in terms of rule 55(1)(c) of CGST Rules, 2017
for sending the stand-alone machines and container truck to client location.
(4) As per section 2(119) of the CGST Act, 2017, ‘works contract’ means a contract for, inter alia,
repair, maintenance of any immovable property wherein transfer of property in goods (whether
as goods or in some other form) is involved in the execution of such contract.
In this case, the supplier provides maintenance and repair services for power plants that are
in the nature of immovable property and uses consumables and parts, wherever necessary,
for the repairs. Hence, the contract is that of a works contract.
Further, as per section 2(30) of the CGST Act, 2017, a works contract is a ‘composite supply’
as it consists of taxable supplies of both goods and services which are naturally bundled and
supplied in conjunction with each other. The composite supply of works contract is treated
as supply of service in terms of para 6(a) of Schedule II to the CGST Act, 2017.
The items used in relation to the repair and maintenance work could be consumables or could
be identifiable items/parts. In either case, the transfer of property in goods is incidental to a
composite supply of works contract service. Thus, the value of the items actually used in the
repairs will be included in the invoice raised for the service and will be charged to tax at that
point of time.
Here again, a delivery challan is to be issued in terms of rule 55(1)(c) of CGST Rules, 2017
for sending the items for carrying out the repairs.

(5) The activity is a composite supply of works contract, which is treated as supply of service. As
per section 8(a) of the CGST Act, 2017, a composite supply is treated as a supply of the
principal supply involved therein and charged to tax accordingly.
Since the activity is a supply of service, a tax invoice is to be issued by Mega Engineering
Pvt. Ltd. in terms of section 31(2) of the CGST Act, 2017.
(6) In the given case-
• the place of supply of works contract services relating to the power plant (immovable
property) is the location at which the immovable property is located i.e., Tamil Nadu in
terms of section 12(3)(a) of the IGST Act, 2017.
Therefore, the given supply is an inter-State supply as the location of the supplier and the
place of supply are in two different States [Section 7(1)(a) of IGST Act, 2017]. Thus, the
supply will be leviable to IGST in terms of section 5(1) of the IGST Act, 2017.
(b) (i) As per section 12(7)(a)(ii) of IGST Act, 2017, when service by way of organization of an
event is provided to an unregistered person, the place of supply is the location where the
event is actually held and if the event is held outside India, the place of supply is the location
of recipient.
Since, in the given case, the service recipient [Mr. Dhiraj] is unregistered and event is held in
India, place of supply is the location where the event is actually held i.e., Bengaluru. The
location of the supplier and the location of the recipient is irrelevant i n this case.
(ii) However, if product launch takes place outside India [Bangkok], the place of supply will be
the location of recipient i.e., Pune.
(iii) When service by way of organization of an event is provided to a registered person, place of
supply is the location of recipient vide section 12(7)(a)(i) of IGST Act, 2017.
Therefore, if Mr. Dhiraj is a registered person, then in both the cases i.e., either when product
launch takes place in Bengaluru or Bangkok, the place of supply will be the location of recipient
i.e., Pune.
(c) Computation of assessable value and customs duty payable
Particulars Rs.
CIF value of machine 4,23,379.69
Unloading and handling charges at the place of importation [Note-1] Nil
Freight from port of entry to ICD [Note-2] Nil
Designing charges paid to consultancy firm in Mumbai [Note-3] Nil
Assessable Value 4,23,379.69
Add: Basic customs duty (BCD) @10% (rounded off) 42,338
Add: Education cesses @3% of BCD (rounded off) 1,270
Value for computing IGST 4,66,987.69
IGST @ 18% (rounded off) 84,058
Total duty and tax payable 1,27,666
= [Rs. 42,338 + Rs. 1,270 + Rs. 84,058]
Notes:-
1. Only charges incurred for delivery of goods “to” the place of importation are includible in the
transaction value vide rule 10(2)(a) of Customs Valuation (Determination of Value of Imported

Goods) Rules, 2007. The loading, unloading and handling charges associated with the
delivery of the imported goods “at” the place of importation are not to be added to the CIF
value of the goods.
2. In case of goods imported by sea and transshipped to another custom station in India, the
cost of transport associated with such transshipment is excluded in terms of sixth proviso to
rule 10(2) of Customs Valuation (Determination of Value of Imported Goods) Rules, 2007.
3. Rule 10(1)(b)(iv) of Customs Valuation (Determination of Value of Imported Goods) Rules,
2007 provides that only the design and engineering work undertaken elsewhere than in India
is includible in the assessable value.
2. (a) Computation of gross value of taxable supply on which GST is to be paid by
Mr. Swami
Particulars Amount
(Rs.)
Supplies on which Mr. Swami is liable to pay GST under forward charge
Amount charged for service provided to recognized sports body as selector of 50,000
national team [Note 1]
Commission received as an insurance agent from insurance company [Note 2] Nil
Amount charged as business correspondent for the services provided to the 15,000
urban branch of a nationalised bank with respect to savings bank accounts
[Note 3]
Services provided to foreign diplomatic mission located in India [Note 4] 28,000
Funeral services [Note 5] Nil
Supplies on which Mr. Swami is liable to pay GST under reverse charge
Services received from GTA [Note 6] 45,000
Value of taxable supply on which GST is to be paid 1,38,000
Notes:
(1) Services provided to a recognized sports body by an individual only as a player, referee,
umpire, coach or team manager for participation in a sporting event organized by a recognized
sports body are exempt from GST vide Exemption Notification No. 12/2017 CT(R) dated
28.06.2017. Thus, service provided as selector of team is liable to GST.
(2) Though commission for providing insurance agent’s services is liable to GST, the tax payable
thereon is to be paid by the recipient of service i.e., insurance company, under reverse charge
in terms of Notification No. 13/2017 CT(R) dated 28.06.2017. Thus, Mr. Swami will not be
liable to pay GST on such commission.
(3) Services provided by business correspondent to a banking company with respect to accounts
in its rural area branch are exempt from GST vide Exemption Notification No. 12/2017 CT(R)
dated 28.06.2017. Thus, such services provided in respect of urban area branch will be
taxable.
(4) While services provided by a foreign diplomatic mission located in India are exempt from GST
vide Exemption Notification No. 12/2017 CT(R) dated 28.06.2017, services provided to such
mission are taxable.
(5) Funeral services being covered in entry 4 of Schedule III to CGST Act, 2017 are not a supply
and thus, are outside the ambit of GST.
(6) GST on services provided by a GTA (not paying tax @ 12%) to inter alia a registered person
is payable by the recipient of service i.e., the registered person, under reverse charge in terms
4

of Notification No. 13/2017 CT(R) dated 28.06.2017. The turnover of previous year is
irrelevant in this case.
(b) Apportionment of common credit pertaining to capital goods
Particulars ITC (Rs.)
Capital goods ‘A’ [Note-1] Nil
Capital goods ‘B’ [Note-2] -
Capital goods ‘C’ [Note-3] 60,000
Capital goods ‘D’ [Note-4] 72,000
= Rs. 1,20,000 – Rs. 48,000 (Rs. 1,20,000 × 5% × 8 quarters)
Capital goods ‘E’ [Note-5] 72,000
= Rs. 1,80,000 – Rs. 1,08,000 (Rs. 1,80,000 × 5% × 12 quarters)
Total common credit 2,04,000
Common credit for the tax period under rule 43(1)(e) of CGST Rules, 2017 3,400
= 2,04,000 ÷ 60
Common credit attributable to exempt supplies in a tax period in terms of rule 1,700
43(1)(g) of CGST Rules, 2017
= (Turnover of exempt supplies/Total turnover) × Common credit
= (6,00,000/12,00,000) × Rs. 3,400
Notes:-
1. Since capital goods “A” is exclusively used for non-business purposes, ITC is not available
under rule 43(1)(a) of CGST Rules, 2017.
2. For ITC purposes, taxable supplies include zero-rated supplies under rule 43(1)(b) of CGST
Rules, 2017. Hence, full ITC of Rs. 24,000 is available.
3. Capital goods “C” is commonly used for taxable and exempt supplies.
4. Owing to change in use from exclusively exempt to both taxable and exempt, credit to be
reduced @ 5% per quarter or part thereof in terms of rule 43(1)(c) of CGST Rules, 2017.
5. Owing to change in use from exclusively taxable to both taxable and exempt, credit to be
reduced @ 5% per quarter or part thereof in terms of rule 43(1)(d) of CGST Rules, 2017.
(c) Similarity: In both the schemes, duty free import of inputs, oil and catalyst required for export
products is permitted.
Differences:
(i) Advance Authorisation (AA) is not transferable. DFIA is transferable after export obligation is
fulfilled.
(ii) While AA requires 15% value addition, DFIA requires minimum 20% value addition.
(iii) AA is available to gem and jewellery sector, but DFIA is not.
(iv) DFIA cannot be issued where Standard Input Output Norms (SION) prescribe actual user
condition.
(v) AA can be issued even if SION for the product to be exported is not fixed. DIFA can be issued
only if SION has been fixed for the product to be exported.
OR
The benefits available to Status holders are as under:
(a) Authorization and custom clearances for both imports and exports on self-declaration basis.
5

(b) Fixation of Input Output Norms (SION) on priority i.e. within 60 days.
(c) Exemption from compulsory negotiation of documents through banks. The remittance
receipts, however, would continue to be received through banking channels.
(d) Exemption from furnishing of Bank Guarantee for Schemes under FTP unless otherwise
specified.
(e) Two Star Export Houses and above are permitted to establish export warehouses.
(f) Three Star and above Export House shall be entitled to get benefit of Accredited Clients
Programme (ACP) as per the guidelines of CBEC.
[Note: Any of the above five points may be mentioned.]
3. (a) Computation of input tax credit available with Tan-Supply Pvt. Ltd. in the month of November
2017
S. Particulars Eligible input tax credit
No. CGST* SGST* IGST* Total
Rs. Rs. Rs. Rs.
1. Raw Material
Raw material purchased from Bihar [Refer
14,400 14,400
Note 1(i)]
Raw material imported from China [Refer
29,781 29,781
Note 1(ii)]
Raw material purchased from
unregistered suppliers within West Bengal Nil Nil Nil
[Refer Note 1(iii)]
Raw material destroyed due to seepage
Nil Nil Nil
[Refer Note 1(iv)]
Remaining raw material purchased from
West Bengal [Refer Note 1(i)] 7,650 7,650 15,300
Total 7,650 7,650 44,181 59,481
2. Consumables [Refer Note 2] 9,000 9,000 18,000
3. Transportation charges for bringing the
1,500 1,500 3,000
raw material to factory [Refer Note 3]
4. Salary paid to employees on rolls [Refer
Nil Nil Nil Nil
Note 4]
5. Premium paid on life insurance policies
taken for specified employees
[Refer Note 5] 14,400 14,400 - 28,800
32,550 32,550 44,181 1,09,281
Computation of net GST payable

Particulars CGST* SGST* IGST* Total
Rs. Rs. Rs. Rs.
On Intra-state sales in West Bengal 63,000 63,000 1,26,000
On Inter-state sales other than West
54,000 54,000
Bengal
On exports under bond [Note 6] Nil Nil Nil Nil

On inward supply of GTA services

under reverse charge [Note 3] 1,500 1,500 3,000
Total output tax liability 64,500 64,500 54,000 1,83,000
Less: Cash paid towards tax payable
(1,500) (1,500) (3,000)
Less: Input tax credit [Note 7]
Opening balance of input tax credit on
(15,000) (8,000) (10,000) (33,000)
01.11.2017
Input tax credit availed during the
(32,550) (32,550) (44,181) (1,09,281)
month [Note-8]
181 (IGST)
Net GST payable 15,269 22,450 Nil 37,719
Notes:
(1) (i) Credit of input tax (CGST & SGST/ IGST) paid on raw materials used in the course or
furtherance of business is available in terms of section 16(1) of the CGST Act.
(ii) IGST paid on imported goods qualifies as input tax in terms of section 2(62)(a) of the
CGST Act. Therefore, credit of IGST paid on imported raw materials used in the course
or furtherance of business is available in terms of section 16(1) of the CGST Act.
(iii) All intra-State procurements made by a registered person from an unregistered supplier
have been exempted from CGST leviable thereon till 30.06.2018 [Notification No. 8/2017
CT (R) dated 28.06.2017 as amended by Notification No. 10/2018 CT (R) dated
23.03.2018]. Therefore, since no GST is paid on such raw material, there does not arise
any question of input tax credit on such raw material.
(iv) Input tax credit is not available on destroyed inputs in terms of section 17(5)(h) of the
CGST Act.
2. Consumables, being inputs used in the course or furtherance of business, input tax credit is
available on the same in terms of section 16(1) of the CGST Act. However, levy of CGST on
diesel has been deferred till such date as may be notified by the Government on
recommendations of the GST Council [Section 9(2) of the CGST Act]. Hence, there being no
levy of GST on diesel, there cannot be any input tax credit of the same.
3. In respect of intra-State road transportation of goods undertaken by a GTA, who has not paid
CGST @ 6%, for any person registered under the GST law, CGST is payable under reverse
charge by the recipient of service. The person who pays or is liable to pay freight for the
transportation of goods is treated as the person who receives the service [Notification No.
13/2017 CT (R) dated 28.06.2017]. Thus, Tan-Supply Pvt. Ltd. will pay GST under reverse
charge on transportation service received from GTA.
Further, tax payable under section 9(3) of the CGST/SGST Act qualifies as input tax in terms
of clauses (b) and (d) of section 2(62) of the CGST Act. Thus, input tax paid under reverse
charge on GTA service will be available as input tax credit in terms of section 16(1) of the
CGST Act as the said service is used in course or furtherance of business.
Furthermore, intra-State services by way of transportation of goods by road except the
services of a GTA and a courier agency are exempt from CGST vide Notification No. 12/2017
CT (R) dated 28.06.2017. Therefore, since no GST is paid on horse pulled cart services,
there cannot be any input tax credit on such services.

4. Services by employees to employer in the course of or in relation to his employment is not a

supply in terms of section 7 read with para 1 of Schedule III to the CGST Act. Therefore,
since no GST is paid on such services, there cannot be any input tax credit on such services.
5. Input tax credit on supply of life insurance service is not blocked if the Government has made
it obligatory for an employer to provide such service to its employees [Section 17(5)(b)(iii)(A)
of the CGST Act]. Therefore, GST paid on premium for life insurance policies will be available
as input tax credit in terms of section 16(1) of the CGST Act as the said service is used in the
course or furtherance of business.
6. Export of goods is a zero rated supply in terms of section 16(1)(a) of the IGST Act. A zero
rated supply under bond is made without payment of integrated tax [Section 16(3)(a) of the
IGST Act].
7. Since export of goods is a zero rated supply, there will be no apportionment of inpu t tax credit
and full credit will be available [Section 16 of the IGST Act read with section 17(2) of the
CGST Act].
8. As per section 49(5) of the CGST Act, input tax credit of-
(i) IGST is utilised towards payment of IGST, CGST and SGST in that order.
(ii) CGST is utilised towards payment of CGST and IGST in that order.
(iii) SGST is utilised towards payment of SGST and IGST in that order
9. Section 49(4) of the CGST Act lays down that the amount available in the electronic credit
ledger may be used for making payment towards output tax. However, tax payable under
reverse charge is not an output tax in terms of section 2(82) of the CGST Act. Therefore, t ax
payable under reverse charge cannot be set off against the input tax credit and thus, will ha ve
to be paid in cash.
*10. CGST and SGST are chargeable on intra-State inward and outward supplies and IGST is
chargeable on inter-State inward and outward supplies.
(b) Computation of value of taxable supplies by Element Ltd.
Particulars Rs.
List price of the goods 76,000
Add: Special packing [Note 1] 5,000
Duty levied by local authority on sale of goods [Note 2] 4,000
CGST and SGST charged [Note 2] -
Subsidy received from a NGO [Note 3] 5,000
Less: Discount offered
= 3% of List price = Rs. 76,000 × 3% [Note-4] 2,280
Value of taxable supplies 87,720
Notes:
1. Being incidental expenses charged by the supplier to the recipient of supply, packing charges
are includible in the value as per section 15(2)(c) of the CGST Act, 2017.
2. Taxes, duties, etc. levied under any law for the time being in force other than CGST,
SGST/UTGST, IGST are includible in the value as per section 15(2)(a) of CGST Act, 2017.
Duty levied by local authority on sale of goods has been assumed to be recovered from
Molecule Ltd. and not included in the list price of the goods.
3. Subsidy directly linked to the price received from a non-Government body is includible in the
value in terms of section 15(2)(e) of CGST Act, 2017.
8

4. Since discount is known at the time of supply, it is deductible from the value in terms of section
15(3)(a) of CGST Act, 2017
(c) As per section 112 of the Customs Act, 1962:-
(1) Penalty imposable in case of non-prohibited dutiable goods is penalty not exceeding:
(i) 10% of the duty sought to be evaded – Rs. 1,545 [10% of {(Rs. 11,50,000 -
Rs. 10,00,000) × 10.30%}]
or
(ii) Rs. 5,000,
whichever is higher – Rs. 5,000.
(2) Where duty adjudicated and interest thereon is paid within 30 days from the date of
communication of order, penalty liable to be paid under section 112 shall be reduced to
25% of the penalty so determined i.e. Rs. 1,250 [25% of Rs. 5,000].
(3) Penalty imposable on goods whose value has been over declared is penalty not
exceeding:
(i) Difference between declared value and value determined by customs –
Rs. 5,00,000 [Rs. 20,00,000 - Rs. 15,00,000]
or
(ii) Rs. 5,000,
whichever is higher – Rs. 5,00,000.
(4) Penalty imposable on prohibited goods whose value has been over-declared is penalty
not exceeding:
(i) Value of the goods – Rs. 15,00,000
(ii) Difference between declared value and value determined by customs –
Rs. 5,00,000 [Rs. 20,00,000 - Rs. 15,00,000]
or
(ii) Rs. 5,000,
(5) Penalty imposable on prohibited goods whose value has been under-declared is penalty
not exceeding:
(i) Value of the goods = Rs. 20,00,000
or
(ii) Rs. 5,000,
4. (a) (i) (1) Supply of petrol and diesel is not leviable to GST, but supply of machine oil is taxable.
In order to determine whether Fine oils is liable for registration, turnover of both the
supplies, non taxable as well as taxable would be taken into account for the threshold of
Rs. 20 lakhs. Here the turnover of machine oil, petrol and diesel exceeds Rs. 20 lakhs
(Rs. 8.08 crores). Thus, Fine oils is liable for registration.
(2) As per section 23 of the CGST Act, an agriculturist, to the extent of supply of produce
out of cultivation of land is not liable for registration under GST. In the case of Mr. Ramlal,
even though the turnover of produce out of cultivation has exceeded Rs. 20 lakhs, he
will not be liable for registration.
(ii) As per GST law, the mechanism of filing revised returns for any correction of errors/omissions
has been done away with. The rectification of errors/omissions is allowed in the subsequent
Returns. However, no rectification is allowed after furnishing the return for the month of
September following the end of the financial year to which such details pertain or furnishing
of the relevant annual return, whichever is earlier.
9

Hence, the omission in the month of Feb 2018 can be included in the Return for the month
when the omission is noticed. The tax and interest @ 18% due on the turnover omitted to be
reported for the month of Feb 2018 has to be paid along with the taxes for the month in which
the omission is noticed. However, such rectification will be allowed only within the prescribed
period as mentioned above.
(b) The proper officer may recover the dues in following manner:
(a) Deduction of dues from the amount owned by the tax authorities payable to such person.
(b) Recovery by way of detaining and selling any goods belonging to such person;
(c) Recovery from other person, from whom money is due or may become due to such person or
who holds or may subsequently hold money for or on account of such person, to pay to the
credit of the Central or a State Government;
(d) Distrain any movable or immovable property belonging to such person, until the amount
payable is paid. If the dues not paid within 30 days, the said property is to be sold and with
the proceeds of such sale the amount payable and cost of sale shall be recovered.
(e) Through the Collector of the district in which such person owns any property or resides or
carries on his business, as if it was an arrear of land revenue.
(f) By way of an application to the appropriate Magistrate who in turn shall proceed to recover
the amount as if it were a fine imposed by him.
(g) By enforcing the bond/instrument executed under this Act or any rules or regulations made
thereunder.
(h) CGST arrears can be recovered as an arrear of SGST and vice versa [Section 79].
(c) (1) As per the Baggage Rules, 2016, an Indian resident arriving from a country other than Nepal,
Bhutan or Myanmar is allowed duty free clearance of-
(i) Used personal effects and travel souvenirs without any value limit.
(ii) Articles [other than certain specified articles] upto a value of Rs. 50,000 carried as
accompanied baggage [General duty free baggage allowance].
Further, such general duty free baggage allowance of a passenger cannot be pooled with the
general duty free baggage allowance of any other passenger.
(2) One laptop computer when imported into India by a passenger of the age of 18 years or above
(other than member of crew) is exempt from whole of the customs duty [Notification No.
11/2004 Cus dated 08.01.2004].
(3) Accordingly, there will be no customs duty on used personal effects (worth
Rs. 1,20,000) of Mrs. and Mr. Singla and laptop computer brought by them will be exempt
from duty.
Duty payable on personal computer after exhausting the duty free baggage allowance will be
Rs. 54,000 – Rs. 50,000 = Rs. 4,000.
Effective rate of duty for baggage = 36.05% [including education cess & secondary & higher
education cess]
Therefore, total customs duty payable = Rs. 1,442.
5. (a) (i) (1) As per section 132(1)(d)(iii) of the CGST Act, 2017, failure to pay any amount collected
as tax beyond 3 months from due date of payment is punishable with specified
imprisonment and fine provided the amount of tax evaded exceeds at least Rs. 100 lakh.
10

Therefore, failure to deposit Rs. 4 lakh collected as tax by ‘M’ will not be punishable with
imprisonment.
Further, falsification of financial records by ‘M’ is punishable with imprisonment up to 6
months or with fine or both vide section 132(1)(f)(iv) of the CGST Act, 2017 and the said
offence is bailable in terms of section 132(4) of the CGST Act, 2017 assuming that
falsification of records is with an intention to evade payment of tax due under the CGST
Act, 2017.
(2) Failure to pay any amount collected as tax beyond 3 months from due date is punishable
with imprisonment upto 5 years and with fine, if the amount of tax evaded exceeds
Rs. 500 lakh in terms of section 132(1)(d)(i) of the CGST Act, 2017.
Since the amount of tax evaded by ‘N’ exceeds Rs. 500 lakh (Rs. 550 lakh - Rs. 30 lakh),
‘N’ is liable to imprisonment upto 5 years and with fine. Further, the imprisonment shall
be minimum 6 months in the absence of special and adequate reasons to the contrary
to be recorded in the judgment vide section 132(3) of the CGST Act, 2017. Such offence
is non-bailable in terms of section 132(5) of the CGST Act, 2017.
If ‘M’and ‘N’ repeat the offence, they shall be punishable for second and for every
subsequent offence with imprisonment upto 5 years and with fine in terms of section
132(2) of the CGST Act, 2017. Such imprisonment shall also be minimum 6 months in
the absence of special and adequate reasons to the contrary to be recorded in the
judgment.
(ii) (1) As per section 130(2) of the CGST Act, 2017, in case of goods liable for confiscation,
the maximum amount of fine leviable in lieu of confiscation is the market value of the
goods confiscated, less the tax chargeable thereon.
Therefore, the fine leviable = Rs. 20,00,000- Rs. 3,60,000 = Rs. 16,40,000
The aggregate of fine and penalty shall not be less than the amount of penalty leviable
under section 129(1).
(2) In case of conveyance used for carriage of such goods and liable for confiscation, the
maximum amount of fine leviable in lieu of confiscation is equal to tax payable on the
goods being transported thereon [Third proviso to section 130(2) of the CGST Act, 2017].
Therefore, the fine leviable = Rs. 3,60,000
(b) Section 54(8) of the CGST Act, 2017 provides that the refundable amount shall be paid to the
applicant, instead of being credited to the Consumer Welfare Fund, if such amount is relatable to—
(a) refund of tax paid on zero-rated supplies of goods and/or services or on inputs or input
services used in making such zero-rated supplies;
(b) refund of unutilized ITC in case of zero rated supplies made without payment of tax or
accumulated ITC on account of inverted duty structure;
(c) refund of tax paid on a supply which is not provided, either wholly or partially, and for which
invoice has not been issued, or where a refund voucher has been issued;
(d) refund of tax paid on a transaction treating it to be an intra-State supply, but which is
subsequently held to be an inter-State supply or vice-versa;
(e) the tax and interest, if any, or any other amount paid by the applicant, if he had not passed
on the incidence of such tax and interest to any other person; or
(f) the tax or interest borne by notified class of applicants.
11

(c) The Customs Tariff has a set of six Rules for Interpretation of the Tariff Schedule and three General
Explanatory Notes. The six Rules of Interpretation and three General Explanatory Notes are
integral part of the Tariff Schedule. The purpose of their inclusion in Customs Tariff is to
standardize the manner in which the nomenclature in the schedule is to be interpreted so as t o
reduce classification disputes.
Rule 4 of the Rules of Interpretation is called as akin rule. This rule lays down that goods which
cannot be classified in accordance with rules 1, 2 and 3 of the Rules of Interpretation shall be
classified under the heading appropriate to the goods to which they are most akin. In other words,
akin rule’ is a residual rule which is to be applied when classification is not possible by applying
any of the earlier rules. It is a rule of last resort.
6. (a) (i) The provisions relating to liability for GST in case of company in liquidation provided under
section 88 of the CGST Act, 2017 are:-
• Where any company is being wound up whether under the orders of a court or Tribunal
or otherwise, every person appointed as a liquidator/receiver of assets of a company
shall give the intimation of his appointment to the Commissioner within 30 days of his
appointment.
• The commissioner shall ascertain the amount which in the opinion of the Commissioner
would be sufficient to provide for any tax, interest or penalty which is then, or is likely
thereafter to become, payable by the company.
• He shall communicate the details to the liquidator within 3 months of the receipt of
intimation of appointment of liquidator.
• When any private company is wound up and any tax, interest or penalty determined
under the CGST Act on the company for any period, whether before or in the course of
or after its liquidation, cannot be recovered, then every person who was a director of
such company at any time during the period for which the tax was due shall, jointly and
severally, be liable for the payment of such tax, interest or penalty.
• However, director shall not be liable if he proves to the satisfaction of the Commissioner
that the non-recovery cannot be attributed to any gross neglect, misfeasance or breach
of duty on his part in relation to the affairs of the company.
(ii) As per section 107(6) of the CGST Act, 2017, no appeal shall be filed before Appellate
Authority, unless the appellant pays:-
(a) in full tax, interest, fine, fee and penalty arising from impugned order, as is admitted by
him; and
(b) 10% of remaining tax in dispute arising from the impugned order.
Section 112(8) of the CGST Act, 2017 provides that no appeal shall be filed before Tribunal,
unless the appellant pays:-
(a) in full, tax, interest, fine, fee and penalty arising from impugned order, as is admitted by
him, and
(b) 20% of the remaining tax in dispute [in addition to amount deposited before Appellate
Authority] arising from the order appealed against.
On making the pre-deposit as above, the recovery proceedings for the balance amount shall
be deemed to be stayed till the disposal of the appeal.
(b) Assessment order passed by the proper officer may be withdrawn in following cases: -
(i) Assessment of non-filers of returns-The best judgement order passed by the proper officer
under section 62 of the CGST Act shall automatically stand withdrawn where a registered
12

person files a valid return within 30 days of the service of the best judgment assessment
order. However, the liability for payment of interest under section 50(1) of the CGST Act,
2017 or for payment of late fee under section 47 of the CGST Act, 2017 shall continue.
(ii) Summary assessment- As per section 64(2) of the CGST Act, 2017, a taxable person against
whom a summary assessment order has been passed can apply for its withdrawal to the
jurisdictional Additional/Joint Commissioner within 30 days of the date of receipt of the order.
If the said officer finds the order erroneous, he can withdraw it and direct the proper officer to
carry out determination of tax liability in terms of section 73 or 74 of the CGST Act. The
Additional/Joint Commissioner can follow a similar course of action on his own motion if he
finds the summary assessment order to be erroneous.
(c) As per section 23(1) of the Customs Act, 1962, where it is shown to the satisfaction of Assistant or
Deputy Commissioner that any imported goods have been lost or destroyed, otherwise than as a
result of pilferage at any time before clearance for home consumption, the Assistant or Deputy
Commissioner shall remit the duty on such goods. Therefore, duty shall be remitted only if loss
has occurred before clearance for home consumption.
In the given case, it is apparent from the facts that quantity of inputs received in India was 10,000
tonnes and 1,000 tonnes thereof was lost when it was in custody of Port Authorities i.e., be fore
clearance for home consumption was made.
Further, the loss of 1,000 tonnes of inputs cannot be construed to be pilferage, as loss of such
huge quantity cannot be treated as “Petty Theft”.
Hence, the aforesaid provisions of law justify the importer’s claim for remission of duty.
13


MOCK TEST PAPER – 1
FINAL (NEW) COURSE: GROUP – II
Notes:
note.
(iii) All questions should be answered on the basis of position of (i) GST law as amended up to 31st October,
31st October, 2018.
Division A: Multiple Choice Questions (30 marks)
(Questions nos. 1-10 are of 2 marks each and 11- 20 are of 1 marks each)
1. In which of the following supplies of goods and services made exclusively to Government departments,
agencies etc., TDS is required to be deducted?
(i) Health Department executed a contract with a local supplier to supply “medical grade oxygen” of
` 2.6 lakh (including GST @ 18%) and is making full payment.
(ii) Government school is making a payment of `3.5 Lakh to a supplier for supply of cooked food as
mid-day meal under a scheme sponsored by Central/State Government
(iii) Municipal Corporation of Kolkata purchases a heavy generator from a supplier in Delhi. Now, it is
making payment of `5 lakh and IGST @18% on `5 lakh for such purchase.
(iv) Finance Department is making a payment of `3 lakh (including GST @ 18%) to a supplier of
‘printing & stationery’.
Assume all other conditions for deduction of TDS are fulfilled.
(a) (i), (ii) and (iii)
(b) (ii), (iii) and (iv)
(c) Only (i) and (ii)
(d) Only (iii) and (iv)
2. M/s Gyaan Publishing House, registered under GST in Delhi, is engaged in printing and selling of books
as well as trading of stationery items. He has provided following information of a consignment which is
to be supplied to Mumbai: -
(i) Taxable value of supplies indicated on tax invoice: ` 35,000/-
(ii) Value of exempted supplies: ` 8,000/-
(iii) Value of goods to be sent to job worker on delivery challan: ` 15,000/-
Calculate the consignment value for the purpose of generating e-way bill for inter-State supply of goods.
Assume rate of tax on taxable goods to be 18%.
(a) ` 35,000/-
1

(b) ` 50,000/-
(c) ` 56,300/-
(d) ` 64,300/-
3. Mr. Manubhai and Mr. Anubhai are two brothers running a business of supplying lubricants located in
the State of Gujarat in their company, M/s. Ambani Lubricants (P) Ltd. On death of their respected father,
the two brothers have divided their business. However, they have signed an agreement that Mr. Anubhai
will not enter into business of supplying lubricants similar to business done by M/s. Ambani Lubricants
(P) Ltd. run by Mr. Manubhai, for which Mr. Manubhai will pay him ` 2.5 crores as a lump sum payment.
State whether transaction entered through the above agreement constitutes supply under CGST Act,
2017 or not.
(a) Yes, supply of goods by Mr. Manubhai.
(b) Yes, supply of goods by Mr. Anubhai.
(c) Yes, supply of services by Mr. Manubhai.
(d) Yes, supply of services by Mr. Anubhai.
4. Banke Bihari (Pedewala), is a famous sweets manufacturer, located and registered in Mathura, Uttar
Pradesh. He received an order for 200 kg of sweets on 2nd November, 2018 from M/s. Ghoomghoom
Travels (P) Ltd., located and registered in same locality of Mathura for a total consideration of
` 1,00,000/- on occasion of Diwali festival. All 200 kg sweets were delivered to M/s. Ghoomghoom
Travels (P) Ltd. on 5th November, 2018, but without invoice, as accountant of Mr. Banke Bihari was on
leave on that day. However, the invoice was raised for the same on 6th November, 2018, when the
accountant joined the office after leave. Payment in full was made on 7th November, 2018.
Determine the time of supply of goods in this case.
(a) 2nd November, 2018
(b) 5th November, 2018
(c) 6th November, 2018
(d) 7th November, 2018
5. M/s. Buildwell Engineering Consultants, located and registered in Gurugram, Haryana provided
consultancy services to M/s. Taj India Ltd., (located and registered in Mumbai, Maharashtra) for its hotel
to be constructed on land situated in Dubai.
Determine the place of supply of consultancy services provided by M/s. Buildwell Engineering
Consultants to M/s. Taj India Ltd.:
(a) Gurugram, Haryana
(b) Mumbai, Maharashtra
(c) Dubai
(d) None of the above
6. Which of the following activity is taxable under GST?
(i) Supply of food by a hospital to patients (not admitted) or their attendants or visitors.
(ii) Transportation of passengers by non-air-conditioned railways
(iii) Services by a brand ambassador by way of folk dance performance where consideration charged
is ` 1,40,000.
(iv) Transportation of agriculture produce by air from one place to another place in India
(v) Services by way of loading, unloading, packing, storage or warehousing of rice

(vi) Service provided by GTA where consideration charged for transportation of goods for a single
carriage is ` 900
(a) (i), (v), (vi)
(b) (iii), (iv), (v)
(c) (i), (iii), (iv)
(d) (iv), (v)
7. XY, Bangalore, Karnataka furnishes following information:
(i) 10 MT of inputs stock transferred to branch located in Chennai, Tamil Nadu on 10 th April, 20XX.
Transfer value of the inputs shown in the invoice is ` 10,000.
(ii) 5 MT of inputs supplied to customer located in Chennai at ` 12,500 on 10th April, 20XX.
(iii) Cost of production of 1 MT of input is ` 750.
(iv) Chennai branch is eligible for full input tax credit.
The value of the inputs stock transferred to Chennai Branch is-
(a) ` 10,000
(b) ` 25,000
(c) ` 8,250
(d) ` 12,500
8. Shagun started supply of goods in Vasai, Maharashtra from 01.01.20XX. Her turnover exceeded
` 20 lakh on 25.01.20XX. However, she didn’t apply for registration. Determine the amount of penalty,
if any, that may be imposed on Shagun under section 122(1) of the CGST Act, 2017 on 31.03.20XX, if
the tax evaded by her, as on said date, on account of failure to obtain registration is ` 1,26,000:
(a) ` 10,000
(b) ` 1,26,000
(c) ` 12,600
9. Rochester Private Limited has been issued a show cause notice (SCN) on 31.08.2021 under section
73(1) of the CGST Act, 2017 on account of short payment of tax during the period between 01.07.2017
and 31.12.2017. As per section 73(1), in the given case, SCN can be been issued latest
by____________.
(a) 31.12.2021
(b) 30.09.2021
(c) 30.06.2021
(d) 31.12.2020
10. Prabhat International Ltd. exported some goods to USA by air at an FOB price of US $ 1,00,000. Other
details are as follows:
Rate of Rate of exchange Rate of exchange
Particulars Date
duty notified by CBIC prescribed by RBI
Presentation of shipping 1 US $ = 65 1 US $ = 68
16.04.20XX 12%
bill
Let export order 18.05.20XX 10% 1 US $ = 64 1 US $ = 66

The export duty payable by Prabhat International Ltd. is:

(a) ` 6,50,000
(b) ` 7,80,000
(c) ` 7,68,000
(d) ` 6,40,000
11. Which of the following legal services does not fall under reverse charge mechanism provisions as
contained under section 9(3) of the CGST Act, 2017-
(a) Representation services provided by an individual advocate
(b) Representation services provided by a senior advocate
(c) Representation services provided by a firm of advocates
(d) Legal services provided by an advocate to an unregistered individual
12. Which one of the following cannot be a reason for cancellation of GST registration?
(a) There is a change in the constitution of business from partnership firm to proprietorship.
(b) The business has been discontinued.
(c) A composition taxpayer has not furnished returns for three consecutive tax periods.
(d) A registered person, other than composition taxpayer, has not furnished returns for three
consecutive tax periods.
13. A registered person can claim refund of unutilised input tax credit on zero rated supplies without payment
of tax or the credit accumulated on account of inverted tax rate structure:
(a) at the end of the tax period, but before the expiry of 2 years from the relevant date.
(b) before the expiry of the tax period.
(c) before the expiry of 3 years from the relevant date.
(d) before the expiry of 18 months from the relevant date.
14. A registered person, who is under investigation for an offence under Chapter XIX of the CGST Act, 2017,
needs to retain the books of accounts/other records pertaining to such investigation until the expiry of:
(a) 72 months from the due date of furnishing of annual return for the year pertaining to such accounts
and records.
(b) 1 year after final disposal of such investigation.
(c) (a) or (b), whichever is later
15. The time-limit for issuance of order of best judgment assessment under CGST Act, 2017 is:
(a) 5 years from the date specified for furnishing of the annual return for the financial year to which the tax
not paid relates.
(b) 4 years from the date specified for furnishing of the annual return for the financial year to which the tax
not paid relates.
(c) 3 years from the date specified for furnishing of the annual return for the financial year to which the tax
not paid relates.
16. Inspection under CGST Act, 2017 can be ordered if the taxable person has:
(a) suppressed any transaction of supply of goods or services

(b) suppressed stock of goods in hand

(c) contravened any provision of the GST law to evade tax
(d) All of the above
17. Where any agent supplies goods on behalf of his principal:
(a) Such agent shall be jointly and severally liable to pay the GST payable on such goods.
(b) The principal shall be jointly and severally liable to pay the GST payable on such goods.
(c) Both (a) and (b)
(d) None of the above.
18. Under the Customs Act, 1962, the relevant date for determining the rate of exchange in case of imported
goods is:
(a) Date when the vessel arrives in India
(b) Date of presentation of bill of entry
(c) Date of examination of goods by proper officer
(d) Date of deposit of duty
19. Which of the following statement(s) is/are correct?
(i) Cases which are specially designed or fitted to contain a specific article and given with the articles
for which they are intended shall follow the classification of items which are packed;
(ii) Packing materials whether capable of repetitive use or not, cleared along with goods, are
classifiable with goods.
(a) (i)
(b) (ii)
(c) Both (i) and (ii)
(d) None
20. Anti-Dumping duty is calculated as
(a) Higher of margin of dumping or injury margin
(b) Lower of margin of dumping or injury margin
(c) Higher of export price or normal value
(d) Lower of export price or normal value
Division B: Descriptive Questions (70 Marks)
Question no. 1 is compulsory. Attempt any four questions out of the remaining five questions.
1. (a) ‘Sarvshiksha Trust’ is a charitable trust registered under section 12AA of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
The trust is registered under GST in the State of Uttar Pradesh. The trust runs the following
educational institutions:
(i) ‘Kaypee Institute of Technology’ (KIT), a private engineering college in Ghaziabad. KIT also
runs distance learning post graduate engineering programmes. Exams for such programmes
are conducted in select cities at centres appointed by the KIT. All the engineering courses
including the distance learning post graduate engineering programme run by KIT are
approved by The All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE).
(ii) ‘Nanhi Mutthi’, a pre-school in Lucknow.

(iii) ‘Bright Minds’, a coaching institute in Kanpur. The Institute provides coaching for Institute of
Banking Personnel Selection (IBPS) Probationary Officers Exam.
(iv) ‘Gyan Vaibhav’ a higher secondary school affiliated to CBSE Board.
The trust provides the following details relating to the goods and services received by the various
institutions run by it during the period April 20XX to September 20XX:
Table 1
S. Particulars KIT Nanhi Bright Gyan
No. Mutthi Minds Vaibhav
(`) (`) (`) (`)
(i) Printing services for printing the 2,50,000 1,50,000 2,00,000
question papers (paper and content
are provided by the Institutions)
(ii) Paper procured for printing the 4,30,000 2,58,000 3,44,000
question papers
(iii) Courier services for sending the 50,000
admit cards for the examination, to
the students
(iv) Honorarium to paper setters and 5,00,000
examiners (not on the rolls of the
Institution)
(v) Rent for exam centers taken on rent 8,00,000 1,00,000
like schools etc, for conducting
examination
(vi) Subscription for online educational 4,00,000 80,000 2,20,000 2,40,000
journals
[Nanhi Mutthi has taken the
subscription for online periodicals on
child development and experiential
learning]
(vii) Hire charges for buses used to 4,80,000 5,50,000 1,30,000 7,50,000
transport students and faculty from
their residence to college and back
(viii) Catering services for running a 3,20,000 2,60,000 1,80,000 5,00,000
canteen in the campus for students
(Catering services for KIT include a
sum of ` 60,000 for catering at a
student event organised in a
banquet hall outside the campus)
(ix) Security and housekeeping services 6,00,000 4,00,000 3,75,000 4,65,000
for the institution(s)
(Security and housekeeping
services for Gyan Vaibhav include a
sum of ` 80,000 payable for security
and housekeeping at the student
event organised in a banquet hall
outside the campus)

The trust further provides the following details relating to the output services provided to the
students by the various institutions run by it during the period April 20XX to September 20XX:
Table 2
S. Particulars KIT Nanhi Bright Gyan
No. Mutthi Minds Vaibhav
(`) (`) (`) (`)
(i) Tuition fee 35,00,000 15,00,000 20,00,000 25,00,000
(ii) Transport fee charged from 5,00,000 6,00,000 1,30,000 8,50,000
students
(iii) Charges for food supplied in 4,60,000 2,40,000 6,10,000
canteen (located in the
premises of the Institutions)
The canteen facility being
provided by Bright Minds is not
compulsory and is open to
general public as well. However,
canteen facility being provided
by KIT and Gyan Vaibhav is only
for students and staff of such
educational institutions.
With the help of the above details –
(i) determine the amount of GST payable, if any, on goods and services received during April
20XX- September 20XX by the various educational institutions run by the ‘Sarvshiksha Trust’;
(ii) compute net GST liability of the ‘Sarvshiksha Trust’ payable from the Electronic Cash Ledger,
for the period April 20XX to September 20XX.
All the amounts given above are exclusive of taxes, wherever applicable.
Notes:
(i) Rate of GST on catering service is 5%. No ITC has been availed on inputs and input services
used in the supply of catering service. Assume that while providing the catering service in
the canteen, the educational institutions have not used any inputs and input services except
the catering service (mentioned at Sl. No. VIII of Table 1) availed from third parties.
(ii) Rate of GST on goods is 12%. Rate of GST on printing services is 12% and on other services
is 18%.
(ii) Except catering service, wherever relevant, all the conditions necessary for availing the ITC
have been complied with. (10 Marks)
(b) Rahul Agri Millers Ltd., located in Haryana, is engaged in customs milling of paddy into rice. It
does not pay GST on the same as it is of the view that the process of milling of paddy into rice is
exempt under GST since is an intermediate production process in relation to cultivation of plants.
However, Department demands tax on said activity contending that it is not eligible for said
exemption. You are required to determine the veracity of the Department’s contention. (4 Marks)
2. (a) Mr. Rajesh Surana has a proprietorship firm in the name of Surana & Sons in Jaipur. The firm,
registered under GST in the State of Rajasthan, manufactures three taxable products ‘M’, ‘N’ and
‘O’. Tax on ‘N’ is payable under reverse charge. The firm also provides taxable consultancy
services.

The firm has provided the following details for the period April 20XX – September 20XX:
Particulars (`)
Turnover of ‘M’ 14,00,000
Turnover of ‘N’ 6,00,000
Turnover of ‘O’ 10,00,000
Export of ‘M’ with payment of IGST 2,50,000
Export of ‘O’ under letter of undertaking 10,00,000
Consultancy services provided to independent clients located in foreign 20,00,000
countries under LUT. In all cases, the consideration has been received in
convertible foreign exchange within 2-3 months from the date of the invoice
Sale of building (excluding stamp duty of ` 2.50 lakh, being 2% of value) 1,20,00,000
Interest received on investment in fixed deposits with a bank 4,00,000
Sale of shares (Purchase price ` 2,40,00,000/-) 2,50,00,000
Legal services received from an advocate in relation to product ‘M’ 3,50,000
Common inputs and input services used for supply of goods and services 50,00,000
mentioned above [Inputs - ` 35,00,000; Input services - ` 15,00,000]
With the help of the above-mentioned information, compute the net GST liability of Surana & Sons,
payable from Electronic Credit Ledger and/or Electronic Cash Ledger, as the case may be, for the
period April 20XX- September 20XX.
Note: Assume that all the domestic transactions of Surana & Sons are intra-State and that rate of
GST on goods and services are 12% and 18% respectively. All the conditions necessary for
availing the ITC have been complied with. Turnover of Surana & Sons was ` 85,00,000 in the
previous financial year. All the amounts given above are exclusive of GST, wherever applicable.
(9 Marks)
(b) Shubham & Company Ltd. has imported a machine from U.K. From the following particulars
furnished by it, arrive at the assessable value for the purpose of customs duty payable.
Particulars Amount
(i) Price of the machine 10,000 U.K. Pounds
(ii) Freight (air) 3,000 U.K. Pounds
(iii) Engineering and design charges paid to a firm in U.K. 500 U.K. Pounds
(iv) License fee relating to imported goods payable by the buyer 20% of price of machine
as a condition of sale
(v) Materials and components supplied in UK by the buyer free
of cost valued at ` 20,000
(vi) Insurance paid to the insurer in India ` 6,000
(vii) Buying commission paid by the buyer to his agent in U.K. 100 U.K. Pounds
Other particulars:
(i) Inter-bank exchange rate: ` 98 per U.K. Pound.
(ii) CBIC notified exchange rate: ` 100 per U.K. Pound.
(iii) Importer paid ` 5,000 towards demurrage charges for delay in clearing the machine from the
airport. (5 Marks)

3. (a) Rolly Polly Manufacturers Ltd., registered in Mumbai (Maharashtra), is a manufacturer of footwear.
It imports a footwear making machine from USA. Rolly Polly Manufacturers Ltd. avails the services
of Rudra Logistics, a licensed customs broker with its office at Ahmedabad (Gujarat), in meeting
all the legal formalities for getting the said machine cleared from the customs station.
Rolly Polly Manufacturers Ltd. also authorises Rudra Logistics to incur, on its behalf, the expenses
in relation to clearance of the imported machine from the customs station and bringing the same
to its warehouse at Mumbai. These expenses would be reimbursed by Rolly Polly Manufacturers
Ltd. to Rudra Logistics on actual basis. In addition, Rolly Polly Manufacturers Ltd. will also pay the
agency charges to Rudra Logistics for the services rendered by it.
Rudra Logistics raised an invoice in July, 20XX as follows:
S.No. Particulars Amount* (`)
(i) Agency charges 5,00,000
(ii) Unloading of machine at Kandla port, Gujarat 50,000
(iii) Charges for transport of machine from Kandla port, Gujarat to Rudra 25,000
Logistics’ godown in Ahmedabad, Gujarat
(iv) Charges for transport of machine from Rudra Logistics’ Ahmedabad 28,000
godown to the warehouse of Rolly Polly Export Import House in
Mumbai, Maharashtra
(v) Customs duty on machine 5,00,000
(vi) Dock dues 50,000
(vii) Port charges 50,000
(viii) Hotel expenses 45,000
(ix) Travelling expenses 50,000
(x) Telephone expenses 2,000
*exclusive of GST wherever applicable

Compute the value of supply made by Rudra Logistics with the help of given information. Would
your answer be different if Rudra Logistics charges ` 13,00,000 as a lump sum consideration for
clearing the imported machine from the customs station and bringing the same to the warehouse
of Rolly Polly Manufacturers Ltd.? (9 Marks)
(b) Pinnacle Pvt. Ltd. imported five mainframe computer systems from Deliheights Computers, USA
on 31.01.20XX paying customs duty of ` 50 lakh. The computers worked for some time but in
June 20XX some technical faults developed in the systems resulting in complete closure of work.
On being informed about the problem, Deliheights Computers sent his technicians from USA, to
repair the systems in June 20XX itself. However, since no solution was found, the Management
of Pinnacle Pvt. Ltd. re-shipped/returned the goods to Deliheights Computers, USA on 31.12.20XX.
You are the Financial Controller of the Pinnacle Pvt. Ltd. Board of Directors has approached you
for advising whether import duty paid can be taken back from the Central Government when goods
are sent back. Advise, in the light of the provisions of Customs Act, 1962. (5 Marks)
4. (a) Sudama Industries Ltd., registered in the State of Jammu & Kashmir, manufactures plastic pipes
for other suppliers on job-work basis.
On 10.01.20XX, Plasto Manufacturers (registered in the State of Himachal Pradesh) sent plastic
worth ` 4 lakh and moulds worth ` 50,000, free of cost, to Sudama Industries Ltd. to make plastic

pipes. Sudama Industries Ltd. also used its own material - a special type of lamination material for
coating the pipes - worth ` 1 lakh in the manufacture of pipes. It raised an invoice of ` 2 lakh as
job charges for making pipes and returned the manufactured pipes through challan to Plasto
Manufacturers on 20.10.20XX.
The same quality and quantity of plastic pipes, as was made for Plasto Manufacturers, were made
by Sudama Industries Ltd. from its own raw material and sold to Solid Pipes (registered in Jammu
and Kashmir) for ` 7.5 lakh on 20.10.20XX.
Examine the scenario and offer your views on the following issues with reference to the provisions
relating to job work under the GST laws:
(i) Is there any difference between the manufacture of plastic pipes by Sudama Industries Ltd.
for Plasto Manufacturers and for Solid Pipes? (2½ Marks)
(ii) Whether Sudama Industries Ltd. can use its own material even when it is manufacturing the
plastic pipes on job-work basis? (1 Mark)
(iii) Whether sending the plastic and moulds to Sudama Industries Ltd. by Plasto Manufacturers
is a supply and a taxable invoice needs to be issued for the same? (3 Marks)
(iv) Whether Sudama Industries Ltd. should include the value of free of cost plastic supplied by
Plasto Manufacturers in its job charges? (2½ Marks)
(b) Mr. Roy, an Indian entrepreneur, went to London to explore new business opportunities on
01.04.2018. His wife also joined him in London after three months. The following details are
submitted by them with the Customs authorities on their return to India on 15.04.2019:
(a) used personal effects worth ` 80,000,
(b) 2 music systems each worth ` 50,000,
(c) the jewellery brought by Mr. Roy worth ` 48,000 [20 grams] and the jewellery brought by his
wife worth ` 96,000 [40 grams].
With reference to Baggage Rules, 2016, determine whether Mr. and Mrs. Roy will be required to
pay any customs duty? (5 Marks)
5. (a) Ranjan intends to start selling certain goods in Delhi. However, he is not able to determine the
classification of the goods proposed to be supplied by him [as the classification of said goods has
been contentious].
Ranjan’s tax advisor has advised him to apply for the advance ruling in respect of said issue. He
told Ranjan that the advance ruling would bring him certainty and transparency in respect of the
said issue and would avoid litigation later. Ranjan agreed with his view, but has some
apprehensions.
In view of the information given above, you are required to advise Ranjan with respect to following:
(i) The tax advisor asks Ranjan to get registered under GST law before applying for the advance
ruling as only a registered person can apply for the same. Whether Ranjan needs to get
registered? (2 Marks)
(ii) Can Ranjan seek advance ruling to determine the classification of the goods proposed to be
supplied by him?
Further, Sambhav - Ranjan’s friend - is a supplier registered in Delhi. He is engaged in supply
of the goods, which Ranjan proposes to supply at the same commercial level that Ranjan
proposes to adopt.
10

He intends to apply the classification of the goods if decided in the advance ruling order to be
obtained by Ranjan, to the goods supplied by him in Delhi. Whether Sambhav can do so?
(3 Marks)
(iii) Ranjan is apprehensive that if at all advance ruling is permitted to be sought, he has to seek
it every year. Whether Ranjan’s apprehension is correct? (2 Marks)
(iv) The tax advisor is of the view that the order of Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) is final and
is not appealable. Whether the tax advisor’s view is correct? (2 Marks)
(b) Explain briefly the powers of review of the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner of Customs
under section 129D(2) of the Customs Act, 1962 in respect of decisions taken by adjudicating
authority subordinate to him. (5 Marks)
6. (a) In case of death of a person liable to pay tax, interest or penalty, who shall be liable to pay said
dues? Discuss as per the provisions of section 93(1) of the CGST Act, 2017. (4 Marks)
(b) Explain the provisions relating to rectification of errors apparent on the face of record under section
161 of the CGST Act, 2017? (5 Marks)
(c) Briefly explain as to how FTP is linked with customs laws. (5 Marks)
11


MOCK TEST PAPER – 1
SUGGESTED ANSWERS
Division A
1. (d)
2. (c)
3. (d)
4. (b)
5. (b)
6. (c)
7. (a)
8. (b)
9. (b)
10. (a)
11. (d)
12. (d)
13. (a)
14. (c)
15. (a)
16. (d)
17. (c)
18. (b)
19. (a)
20. (b)
Division B
1. (a) (i) Notification No. 12/2017 CT(R) dated 28.06.2017 (hereinafter referred to as exemption
notification) which exempts various services from GST leviable thereon exempts select services
provided to an educational institution.
Here, the “educational institution” means an institution providing services by way of,-
(i) pre-school education and education up to higher secondary school or equivalent;
(ii) education as a part of a curriculum for obtaining a qualification recognised by any law for
the time being in force;
(iii) education as a part of an approved vocational education course;
The select services which are exempt when provided to an educational institution are-
(i) transportation of students, faculty and staff;
(ii) catering, including any mid-day meals scheme sponsored by the Central Government, State
Government or Union territory;
1
(iii) security or cleaning or house-keeping services performed in such educational institution;

(iv) services relating to admission to, or conduct of examination by, such institution;
(v) supply of online educational journals or periodicals
However, the services mentioned in point (i), (ii) and (iii) are exempt only when the same are
provided to an educational institution providing services by way of pre-school education and
education up to higher secondary school or equivalent.
Also, the supply of online educational journals or periodicals are not exempt from GST when
provided to-
(i) pre-school education and education up to higher secondary school or equivalent; or
(ii) education as a part of an approved vocational education course.
In the given case, all the engineering courses including the distance learning post graduate
engineering programme run by KIT are approved by The All India Council for Technical
Education (AICTE). Therefore, since KIT imparts education as a part of a curriculum for
obtaining a qualification recognised by the Indian law, the same is an educational institution in
terms of the exemption notification.
Similarly, Nanhi Mutthi and Gyan Vaibhav, being a pre-school and a higher secondary school
respectively are also educational institutions in terms of the exemption notification.
However, Bright Minds, being a coaching centre, training candidates to secure a banking job, is
not an educational institution in terms of the exemption notification. Hence, none of the select
services (mentioned above) will be exempt when provided to Bright Minds.
In the light of the foregoing provisions, the amount of GST payable on goods and services
received by these educational institutions during April 20XX- September 20XX is computed as
under:
Particulars KIT Nanhi Mutthi Bright Minds Gyan Vaibhav
(`) (`) (`) (`)
Printing services for Exempt 18,000 Exempt
printing the [1,50,000 x 12%]
question papers
(paper and content
are provided by the
Institutions)
Paper procured for 51,600 30,960 41,280
printing the [4,30,000 x [2,58,000 x 12%] [3,44,000 x
question papers – 12%] 12%]
[Supply of select
services to
educational
institutions is
exempt and not
supply of goods to
such educational
institutions]
Courier services for Exempt
sending the admit
cards for the
examination, to the
students
Honorarium to Exempt
paper setters and
2
examiners (not on
the rolls of the
educational
institution)
Rent for exam Exempt 18,000
centers taken on [1,00,000 x 18%]
rent like schools
etc, for conducting
examination
Subscription for Exempt 14,400 39,600 4,320
online educational [80,000 x [2,20,000 x 18%] [2,40,000 x
journals 18%] 18%]
[Nanhi Mutthi has
taken the
subscription for
online periodicals
on child
development and
experiential
learning]
Hire charges for 86,400 Exempt 23,400 Exempt
buses used to [4,80,000 x [1,30,000 x 18%]
transport students 18%]
and faculty from
their residence to
college and back
Catering services for 16,000 Exempt 9,000 Exempt
running a canteen in [3,20,000 x 5%] [1,80,000 x 5%]
the campus for
students
Catering service
provided to pre-
school and the
higher secondary
school is exempt
irrespective of
whether the same is
provided within or
outside the
premises of the pre-
school and the
higher secondary
school
Security and 1,08,000 Exempt 67,500 14,400
housekeeping [6,00,000 x [3,75,000 x 18%] [80,000 x 18%]
services for the 18%]
institution(s)
Security and
housekeeping
service provided to
pre-school and the
higher secondary
school for the
3
student event
organised in a
banquet hall will be
taxable as only the
security and
housekeeping
service provided
within the premises
of the pre-school
and the higher
secondary school
are exempt.
Total GST payable 2,62,000 14,400 2,06,460 60,000
on goods and
services received
by the educational
institutions
(ii) (1) Sl. No. 1 of Notification No. 12/2017 CT (R) dated 28.06.2017 exempts services provided by
an entity registered under section 12AA of the Income-tax Act, 1961 by way of charitable
activities. Here, “charitable activities” means activities relating to inter alia advancement of
educational programmes or skill development relating to,-
(A) abandoned, orphaned or homeless children;
(B) physically or mentally abused and traumatized persons;
(C) prisoners; or
(D) persons over the age of 65 years residing in a rural area;
In the given case, though Sarvshiksha Trust is registered under section 12AA of the
Income-tax Act, 1961, none of the educational institutions run by it are providing services by
way of charitable activities. As is seen from the relevant extract of the definition of the
charitable activities given above, only when the education is provided relating to the persons
mentioned therein, it becomes charitable activity under GST laws. However, in the given
case, education is not provided to any specific group or category of persons as specified
above, but to all the categories of children/candidates approaching the college/pre-
school/coaching institute/higher secondary school. Therefore, the education services
provided by the Sarvshiksha Trust is not exempt under Sl. No. 1 of the exemption
notification.
(2) Sl. No. 66 of Notification No. 12/2017 CT(R) dated 28.06.2017 also exempts services
provided by an educational institution to its students, faculty and staff. All the educational
institutions run by the Sarvshiksha Trust except Bright Minds are educational institutions in
terms of the exemption notification (as explained under point (i) above). Therefore, the
education services, transport services and catering services provided by KIT, Nanhi Mutthi,
and Gyan Vaibhav to its students will all be exempt from GST under Sl. No. 66 of the
exemption notification. Thus, only the educational services provided by Bright Minds will be
liable to GST @ 18%. The catering services provided by Bright Minds will be liable to GST
@ 5%.
(3) No input tax credit (ITC) will be availed on inputs and input services used in providing
exempt education services, i.e. education services by KIT, Nanhi Mutthi, and Gyan Vaibhav.
Only Bright Minds will be entitled to avail ITC on inputs and input services used in providing
taxable education services. However, as per the information given in the question, while
providing the catering service, Bright Minds has not availed any ITC of catering service
received by it from third parties.
4
(4) Since there are no common inputs and input services being used for providing taxable and
exempt services, the need for reversal of ITC attributable to exempt supplies will not arise.
In the light of the foregoing provisions, the net GST liability of Sarvshiksha Trust, which will
comprise of only the tax liability of Bright Minds, is computed as under:
Particulars Bright Minds
(`)
Tuition fee 20,00,000
Transport fee charged from students 1,30,000
Value of output supply taxable @ 18% 21,30,000
GST liability @ 18% [A] 3,83,400
Value of output supply taxable @ 5% [Charges for food] 2,40,000
GST liability @ 5% [B] 12,000
Total GST liability [A]+[B] 3,95,400
Less: ITC [Total tax payable by Bright Minds on the service received by it 1,97,460
as computed in point (i) above less the tax payable on catering charges
(` 2,06,460 - ` 9,000)]
Net GST payable from Electronic Cash Ledger 1,97,940
(b) Yes, the contention of the Department is correct. As per Notification No. 12/2017 CT (R) dated
28.06.2017, carrying out an intermediate production process as job work in relation to cultivation
of plants and rearing of all life forms of animals, except the rearing of horses, for food, fibre, fuel,
raw material or other similar products or agricultural produce is exempt under GST.
Milling of paddy is not an intermediate production process in relation to cultivation of plants. It is a
process carried out after the process of cultivation is over and paddy has been harvested. Further,
processing of paddy into rice is not usually carried out by cultivators, but by rice millers. Milling of
paddy into rice also changes its essential characteristics.
Therefore, milling of paddy into rice cannot be considered as an intermediate production process in
relation to cultivation of plants for food, fibre or other similar products or agricultural produce. In view
of the above, it is clarified by CBIC that milling of paddy into rice is not eligible for exemption under
said notification. Thus, GST is payable on the said activity.
2. (a) Computation of net GST liability of Surana & Sons for the period April 20XX – September
20XX
Particulars (`)
GST payable on outward supply [Refer Working Note 1] 3,18,000
GST payable on legal services under reverse charge [` 3,50,000 X 18%] 63,000
[Tax on legal services provided by an advocate to a business entity, is payable
under reverse charge by the business entity in terms of Notification No.
13/2017 CT (R) dated 28.06.2017. Further, such services are not eligible for
exemption provided under Notification No. 12/2017 CT (R) dated 28.06.2017
as the turnover of the business entity [Surana & Sons] in the preceding
financial year exceeds ` 20 lakh.]
Common credit attributable to exempt supplies during the period April 20XX – 4,74,820
September 20XX [Refer Working Note 2]
Less: Input tax credit (ITC) [Refer Working Note 3] 7,53,000
5
Less: Tax paid in cash (` 63,000 + ` 39,820) 1,02,820

[As per section 49(4) of the CGST Act, 2017 amount available in the electronic
credit ledger may be used for making payment towards output tax. However,
tax payable under reverse charge is not an output tax in terms of section 2(82)
of the CGST Act, 2017. Therefore, tax payable under reverse charge cannot
be set off against the input tax credit and thus, will have to be paid in cash.]
Working Note 1
Computation of GST payable on outward supply
Particulars Value (`) GST (`)

Turnover of ‘M’ [liable to GST @ 12%] 14,00,000 1,68,000
Turnover of ‘N’ [Tax on ‘N’ is payable under reverse charge by 6,00,000 Nil
the recipient of such goods]
Turnover of ‘O’ [liable to GST @ 12%] 10,00,000 1,20,000
Export of ‘M’ with payment of IGST @ 12% 2,50,000 30,000
Export of ‘O’ under letter of undertaking (LUT) 10,00,000 Nil
[Export of goods is a zero rated supply in terms of section
16(1)(a) of the IGST Act, 2017. A zero rated supply can be
supplied without payment of tax under a LUT in terms of section
16(3)(a) of that Act.]
Consultancy services provided to independent clients located in 20,00,000 Nil
foreign countries under LUT.
[The activity is an export of service in terms of section 2(6) of the
IGST Act, 2017 as-
• the supplier of service is located in India;
• the recipient of service is located outside India;
• place of supply of service is located outside India (in terms of
section 13(2) of the IGST Act, 2017);
• payment for the service has been received in convertible
foreign exchange; and
• supplier of service and recipient of service are not merely
establishments of distinct person.
[Export of services is a zero rated supply in terms of section
16(1)(a) of the IGST Act, 2017. A zero rated supply can be
supplied without payment of tax under a LUT in terms of section
16(3)(a) of that Act.]
Sale of building 1,20,00,000 Nil
[Sale of building is neither a supply of goods nor a supply of
services in terms of para 5 of Schedule III to the CGST Act, 2017
and hence, is not liable to any tax]
Interest received on investment in fixed deposits with a bank 4,00,000 Nil
[Exempt vide Notification No. 12/2017 CT (R) dated 28.06.2017]
Sale of shares 2,50,00,000 Nil
[Shares are neither goods nor services in terms of section 2(55)
and 2(102) of the CGST Act, 2017. Hence, sale of shares is
neither a supply of goods nor a supply of services and hence, is
not liable to any tax.]
Total GST payable on outward supply 3,18,000
6
Working Note 2
Computation of common credit attributable to exempt supplies during the period
April 20XX – September 20XX
Particulars (`)
Common credit on inputs and input services -[Refer Working Note 3 below] 6,90,000
Common credit attributable to exempt supplies (rounded off) 4,74,820
= Common credit on inputs and input services x (Exempt turnover during the
period / Total turnover during the period)
= ` 6,90,000 x ` 1,33,50,000/ ` 1,94,00,000
Exempt turnover = ` 1,33,50,000 and total turnover = ` 1,94,00,000 [Refer note
below]
Note:
As per section 17(3) of the CGST Act, 2017, value of exempt supply includes supplies on which
the recipient is liable to pay tax on reverse charge basis, transactions in securities, sale of land
and, subject to clause (b) of paragraph 5 of Schedule II, sale of building. As per explanation to
Chapter V of the CGST Rules, 2017, the value of exempt supply in respect of land and building is
the value adopted for paying stamp duty and for security is 1% of the sale value of such security.
Further, as per explanation to rule 42 of the CGST Rules, 2017, the aggregate value of exempt
supplies inter alia excludes the value of services by way of accepting deposits, extending loans
or advances in so far as the consideration is represented by way of interest or discount, except in
case of a banking company or a financial institution including a non-banking financial company,
engaged in supplying services by way of accepting deposits, extending loans or advances.
Therefore, value of exempt supply in the given case will be the sum of value of output supply on
which tax is payable under reverse charge (` 6,00,000), value of sale of building (` 2,50,000 / 2 x
100 = ` 1,25,00,000) and value of sale of shares (1% of ` 2,50,00,000 = ` 2,50,000), which
comes out to be ` 1,33,50,000.
Total turnover = ` 1,94,00,000 (` 14,00,000 + ` 6,00,000 + ` 10,00,000 + ` 2,50,000 +
` 10,00,000 + ` 20,00,000 + ` 1,25,00,000 + ` 4,00,000 + ` 2,50,000)
Working Note 3
Computation of ITC available in the Electronic Credit Ledger of the Surana & Sons for the
period April 20XX- September 20XX
Particulars (`)
Common credit on inputs and input services 6,90,000
[Tax on inputs - ` 4,20,000 (` 35,00,000 x 12%) + Tax on input services – `
2,70,000 (` 15,00,000 x 18%)]
Legal services used in the manufacture of taxable product ‘M’ 63,000
ITC available in the Electronic Credit Ledger 7,53,000
(b) Computation of assessable value of machine imported by Shubham & Co. Ltd.
Particulars Amount (£)
Price of the machine 10,000
Add: Engineering and design charges paid in UK [Note 1] 500
Licence fee relating to imported goods payable by the buyer as a
condition of sale (20% of price of machine) [Note 1] 2,000
7
Total 12,500
Amount (`)
Value in Indian currency [£12,500 x `100] [Note 2] 12,50,000
Add: Materials and components supplied by the buyer free of cost [Note 1] 20,000
FOB 12,70,000
Add: Freight [Note 3] 2,54,000
Insurance paid to the insurer in India [Note 1] 6,000
CIF value 15,30,000
Assessable value (rounded off) 15,30,000.00
Notes:
1. Engineering and design charges paid in UK, licence fee relating to imported goods payable
by the buyer as a condition of sale, materials and components supplied by the buyer free of
cost and actual insurance charges paid are all includible in the assessable value [Rule 10 of
the Customs (Determination of Value of Imported Goods) Rules, 2007].
2. As per explanation to section 14(1) of the Customs Act, 1962, assessable value should be
calculated with reference to the rate of exchange notified by the CBIC.
3. If the goods are imported by air, the freight cannot exceed 20% of FOB value [Fifth proviso
to rule 10(2) of the Customs (Determination of Value of Imported Goods) Rules, 2007].
4. Buying commission is not included in the assessable value [Rule 10(1)(a) of the Customs
(Determination of Value of Imported Goods) Rules, 2007].
5. Only ship demurrage charges on chartered vessels are included in the cost of transport of
the imported goods. Thus, demurrage charges for delay in clearing the machine from the
airport will not be includible in the assessable value [Explanation to rule 10(2) of the
Customs (Determination of Value of Imported Goods) Rules, 2007].
3. (a) As per explanation to rule 33 of the CGST Rules, 2017, a “pure agent” means a person who-
(a) enters into a contractual agreement with the recipient of supply to act as his pure agent to
incur expenditure or costs in the course of supply of goods or services or both;
(b) neither intends to hold nor holds any title to the goods or services or both so procured or
supplied as pure agent of the recipient of supply;
(c) does not use for his own interest such goods or services so procured; and
(d) receives only the actual amount incurred to procure such goods or services in addition to
the amount received for supply he provides on his own account.
The supplier needs to fulfil ALL the above conditions in order to qualify as a pure agent.
In the given case, Rudra Logistics has been authorised by the recipient of supply - Rolly Polly
Manufacturers Ltd. - to incur, on its behalf, the expenses incurred in relation to clearance of the
imported machine from the customs station and bringing the same to the warehouse of the
recipient, i.e. expenses mentioned in S.No. (ii) to (vii). Further, Rudra Logistics does not hold
any title to said services and does not use them for his own interest.
Lastly, Rudra Logistics receives only the actual amount incurred to procure such services in
addition to agency charges. Thus, Rudra Logistics qualifies as a pure agent.
Further, rule 33 of the CGST Rules, 2017 stipulates that notwithstanding anything contained in
the provisions of Chapter IV – Determination of Value of Supply, the expenditure or costs
incurred by a supplier as a pure agent of the recipient of supply shall be excluded from the value
of supply, if all the following conditions are satisfied, namely-
8
(I) the supplier acts as a pure agent of the recipient of the supply, when he makes the payment
to the third party on authorisation by such recipient;
(II) the payment made by the pure agent on behalf of the recipient of supply has been
separately indicated in the invoice issued by the pure agent to the recipient of service; and
(III) the supplies procured by the pure agent from the third party as a pure agent of the recipient
of supply are in addition to the services he supplies on his own account.
Since conditions (I) to (III) mentioned above are satisfied in the given case, expenses (ii) to (vii)
incurred by Rudra Logistics as a pure agent of Rolly Polly Manufacturers Ltd. shall be excluded
from the value of supply.
Accordingly, value of supply made by Rudra Logistics will be computed as under:
Particulars Amount
(`)
Agency charges 5,00,000
Add: Unloading of machine at Kandla port, Gujarat Nil
Add: Charges for transport of machine from Kandla port, Gujarat to its Rudra Nil
Logistics’ godown in Ahmedabad, Gujarat
Add: Charges for transport of machine from Rudra Logistics’ Ahmedabad Nil
godown to the warehouse of Rolly Polly Export Import House in Mumbai,
Maharashtra
Add: Customs duty Nil
Add: Dock charges Nil
Add: Port charges Nil
Add: Hotel expenses 45,000
Add: Travelling expenses 50,000
Add: Telephone expenses 2,000
However, if Rudra Logistics charges ` 13,00,000 as a lump sum consideration for getting the
imported machine cleared from the customs station and bringing the same to the warehouse of
Rolly Polly Manufacturers Ltd., Rudra Logistics would incur expenses (ii) to (vii) for its own
interest (as the agreement requires it to get the imported machine cleared from the customs
station and bring the same to the Rolly Polly Manufacturers Ltd.’s warehouse). Thus, Rudra
Logistics would not be considered as a pure agent of Rolly Polly Manufacturers Ltd. for said
services.
Consequently, in that case, value of supply will be ` 13,00,000.
(b) Yes, the import duty already paid can be claimed back on five mainframe computer systems
imported by Pinnacle Pvt. Ltd. in accordance with the provision of section 74 of Customs Act.
Under this section, it is provided that when goods capable of being easily identified, which have
been imported into India and upon which duty has been paid on importation are entered for
export and the proper officer makes an order permitting clearance and loading of the goods for
exportation, 98% of such duty shall be paid back as drawback. However, the goods should be
identified to the satisfaction of Assistant Commissioner of Customs as the goods that were
imported and the goods should have entered for export within two years from the date of
payment of duty on the importation thereof.
Further, it is provided in the section that 98% of drawback shall be allowed only in those cases
where the goods have not been used at all after the importation. Various percentages have been
9
fixed by the Government as the amount of drawback payable in respect of goods that are used
after their importation.
In the instant case, all the conditions specified in provisions of section 74 are satisfied. The
goods are identifiable, import duty has been paid and they are scheduled to be exported within
the prescribed time limit. However, the goods have been used for some time. Here, the period
between the date of clearance for home consumption and the date when the goods are placed
under the customs control for export is more than 9 months, but not more than 12 months.
Therefore, Pinnacle Pvt. Ltd. will be eligible for the drawback claim at the rate of 70% (rate
notified by the Government in such case) of the import duty paid.
4. (a) (i) As per section 2(68) of the CGST Act, 2017, job work means any treatment or process
undertaken by a person on goods belonging to another registered person and the
expression “job worker” shall be construed accordingly. The registered person on whose
goods (inputs or capital goods) job work is performed is called the principal. Thus, the job
worker is expected to work on the goods sent by the principal.
Therefore, when the goods are manufactured by Sudama Industries Ltd. for Plasto
Manufacturers, it is job work as the manufacturing process is undertaken on inputs (plastic
and moulds) supplied by the principal (Plasto Manufacturers) and when goods are
manufactured for Solid Pipes, it is manufacture on own account as the pipes are
manufactured from company’s own raw material. Further, manufacture on job work basis is
a supply of service in terms of para 3 of Schedule II to the CGST Act, 2017 and
manufacture of pipes on own account is a supply of goods.
(ii) It has been clarified vide Circular No. 38/12/2018 GST dated 26.03.2018 that the job worker,
in addition to the goods received from the principal, can use his own goods for providing the
services of job work.
(iii) Section 143 of the CGST Act, 2017 provides that the registered principal may, without
payment of tax, send inputs or capital goods to a job worker for job work. Subsequently, on
completion of the job work, the principal shall either bring back the goods to his place of
business or supply (including export) the same directly from the place of business/premises
of the job worker within one year in case of inputs or within three years in case of capital
goods (except moulds and dies, jigs and fixtures or tools). Thus, the provision relating to
return of goods is not applicable in case of moulds, dies, jigs, fixtures and tools.
If the time frame of one year / three years for bringing back or further supplying the inputs /
capital goods is not adhered to, the activity of sending the goods for job work shall be
deemed to be a supply by the principal on the day when the said inputs / capital goods were
sent out by him. Thus, essentially, sending goods for job work is not a supply as such, but it
acquires the character of supply only when the inputs/capital goods sent for job work are
neither received back by the principal nor supplied further by the principal from the place of
business / premises of the job worker within one/three years of being sent out.
Therefore, sending of plastic and moulds by Plasto Manufacturers to Sudama Industries Ltd.
(job worker) is not supply as the manufactured pipes are received back within the stipulated
time and the provisions relating to return of goods are not applicable in case of moulds.
Rule 45 of the CGST Rules provides that the inputs, semi-finished goods or capital goods
being sent for job work shall be sent under the cover of a challan issued by the principal.
Therefore, Plasto Manufacturers need not issue a taxable invoice for sending the inputs to
Sudama Industries Ltd. but should send the inputs under the cover of a challan.
(iv) As per section 15(2)(b) of the CGST Act, any amount that the supplier is liable to pay in
relation to such supply but which has been incurred by the recipient of the supply and not
included in the price actually paid or payable for the goods or services or both, is includible
in the value of supply. However, Sudama Industries Ltd. should not include the value of
10
free of cost plastic supplied by Plasto Manufacturers in its job charges as Sudama
Industries Ltd. is manufacturing the plastic pipes on job work basis. The scope of supply of
the Sudama Industries Ltd. is to manufacture plastic pipes from the raw material supplied by
the Plasto Manufacturers. Thus, at no point of time was Sudama Industries Ltd. (supplier of
job work service) liable to pay for the raw material and therefore, the value thereof should
not be included in its job charges even though the same has been incurred by Plasto
Manufacturers (recipient of job work service).
(b) As per rule 3 of the Baggage Rules, 2016, an Indian resident arriving from any country other than
Nepal, Bhutan or Myanmar, shall be allowed clearance free of duty articles in his bona fide
baggage, that is to say, used personal effects and travel souvenirs; and articles [other than
certain specified articles], upto the value of ` 50,000 if these are carried on the person or in the
accompanied baggage of the passenger.
Thus, there is no customs duty on used personal effects and travel souvenirs and general duty
free baggage allowance is ` 50,000 per passenger. Thus, duty liability of Mr. Roy and his wife is
nil for the used personal effects worth ` 80,000 and 2 music systems each worth ` 50,000.
As per rule 5 of the Baggage Rules, 2016, the jewellery allowance is as follows:
Jewellery brought by Duty free allowance
Gentleman Passenger Jewellery upto a weight of 20 grams with a value cap of
` 50,000
Lady Passenger Jewellery upto a weight of 40 grams with a value cap of `
1,00,000
However, the jewellery allowance is applicable only to a passenger residing abroad for more than
1 year.
Consequently, there is no duty liability on the jewellery brought by Mr. Roy as he had stayed
abroad for period exceeding 1 year and weight of the jewellery brought by him is 20 grams with a
value less than ` 50,000.
However, his wife is not eligible for this additional jewellery allowance as she had stayed abroad
for a period of less than a year. Thus, she has to pay customs duty on the entire amount of
jewellery brought by her as she has already exhausted the general duty free baggage allowance
of ` 50,000 allowed under rule 3.
5. (a) (i) Advance ruling under GST can be sought by a registered person or a person desirous of
obtaining registration under GST law [Section 95(c) of the CGST Act, 2017]. Therefore, it is
not mandatory for a person seeking advance ruling to be registered.
(ii) Section 97(2) of the CGST Act, 2017 stipulates the questions/matters on which advance
ruling can be sought. It provides that advance ruling can be sought for, inter alia,
determining the classification of any goods or services or both. Therefore, Ranjan can seek
the advance ruling for determining the classification of the goods proposed to be supplied
by him.
Further, section 103 of the CGST Act provides that an advance ruling pronounced by AAR is
binding only on the applicant who had sought it and on the concerned officer or the
jurisdictional officer in respect of the applicant. This implies that an advance ruling is not
applicable to similarly placed other taxable persons in the State. It is only limited to the
person who has applied for an advance ruling.
Thus, Sambhav will not be able to apply the classification of the goods that will be decided
in the advance ruling order to be obtained by Ranjan, to the goods supplied by him in Delhi.
(iii) Section 103(2) of the CGST Act, 2017 stipulates that the advance ruling shall be binding
unless the law, facts or circumstances supporting the original advance ruling have changed.
Therefore, once Ranjan has sought the advance ruling with respect to an eligible
11
matter/question, it will be binding till the time the law, facts and circumstances supporting
the original advance ruling remain same.
(iv) No, the tax advisor’s view is not correct. As per section 100 of the CGST Act, 2017, if the
applicant is aggrieved with the finding of the AAR, he can file an appeal with Appellate
Authority for Advance Ruling (AAAR). Similarly, if the concerned/ jurisdictional officer of
CGST/SGST does not agree with the findings of AAR, he can also file an appeal with AAAR.
Such appeal must be filed within 30 days from the receipt of the advance ruling. The
Appellate Authority may allow additional 30 days for filing the appeal, if it is satisfied that
there was a sufficient cause for delay in presenting the appeal.
(b) Section 129D(2) of the Customs Act, 1962 empowers the Principal Commissioner of Customs or
Commissioner of Customs to review any decision taken by the adjudicating authority subordinate
to him. For this purpose, he may, of his own motion, call for and examine the record of any
proceeding in which an adjudicating authority subordinate to him has passed any decision or
order under the Act for the purpose of satisfying himself as to the legality or propriety of any such
decision or order.
Thereafter, the Principal Commissioner of Customs or Commissioner of Customs may, by order,
direct such authority or any officer of Customs subordinate to him to apply to the Commissioner
(Appeals) for the determination of such points arising out of the decision or order as may be
specified by him in his order.
Such review application is treated as Departmental appeal against order of adjudicating authority
lower in rank than Principal Commissioner/ Commissioner of Customs like Additional/
Joint/Deputy/ Assistant Commissioner.
6. (a) Save as otherwise provided in the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, where a person, liable
to pay tax, interest or penalty under CGST Act, dies, then:
 business is continued after his death: if a business carried on by the person is continued
after his death by his legal representative or any other person, such legal representative or
other person, shall be liable to pay tax, interest or penalty due from such person under this
Act.
 business is discontinued after his death: if the business carried on by the person is
discontinued, whether before or after his death, his legal representative shall be liable to
pay, out of the estate of the deceased, to the extent to which the estate is capable of
meeting the charge, the tax, interest or penalty due from such person under this Act,
whether such tax, interest or penalty has been determined before his death but has remained
unpaid or is determined after his death.
(b) Section 161 of the CGST Act lays down that any authority, who has passed or issued any
decision or order or notice or certificate or any other document, may rectify any error which is
apparent on the face of record in such decision or order or notice or certificate or any other
document, either on its own motion or where such error is brought to its notice by any GST officer
or by the affected person within a period of three months from the date of issue of such decision
or order or notice or certificate or any other document, as the case may be.
However, no such rectification shall be done after a period of six months from the date of issue of
such decision or order or notice or certificate or any other document. Further, the said period of
six months shall not apply in such cases where the rectification is purely in the nature of
correction of a clerical or arithmetical error, arising from any accidental slip or omission.
Principles of natural justice should be followed by the authority carrying out such rectification, if it
adversely affects any person.
(c) The Foreign Trade Policy is closely knit with the Customs laws of India. However, the policy
provisions per-se do not override tax laws. The exemptions extended by FTP are given effect to
12
by issue of notifications under respective tax laws (e.g., IGST Act, CGST Act, SGST/UTGST Act,
Customs Tariff Act, 1975, Central Excise Act, 1944, Customs Act, 1962 etc.). Thus, actual
benefit of the exemption depends on the language of exemption notifications issued by the CBIC.
In most of the cases the exemption notifications refer to policy provisions for detailed conditions.
Ministry of Finance/ Tax Authorities cannot question the decision of authorities under the Ministry
of Commerce (so far as the issue of authorization etc. is concerned).
Decision of Director General of Foreign Trade (DGFT) is final and binding in respect of (a)
Interpretation of any provision of foreign trade policy or provision of Handbook of Procedures,
Appendices, Aayat Niryat Forms (b) Classification of any item in ITC(HS).
13

MOCK TEST PAPER 1
FINAL (NEW) COURSE GROUP II
Notes:
(i) Working Notes should form part of the answer. However, in answers to Question in Division A, working
notes are not required.
note.
(iii) All questions should be answered on the basis of position of (i) GST law as amended up to 30 th April,
30th April, 2019.
also hypothetical and may not necessarily be the actual rates. Further, GST compensation cess
should be ignored in all the questions, wherever applicable.
(Questions nos. 1-10 are of 2 marks each and 11- 20 are of 1 marks each)
Write the most appropriate answer to each of the following multiple choice questions by choosing
one of the four options given. All questions in this division are compulsory.
1. State which of the following statement is incorrect:
(i) An agent, supplying goods on behalf of principal where invoice is issued in the name of principal,
is required to get compulsorily registered under GST.
(ii) Persons who are required to deduct tax under section 51, whether or not separately registered
under this Act are compulsory required to get registered under GST without any threshold.
(iii) Every person supplying online information and database access or retrieval services from a place
outside India to a registered person in India is compulsory required to get registered under GST
without any threshold.
(iv) Persons who supply services, other than supplies specified under sub-section (5) of section 9,
through such electronic commerce operator who is required to collect tax at source under section
52 are compulsory required to get registered under GST without any threshold.
(a) (i), (ii)
(b) (iii), (iv)
(c) (i), (iii), (iv)
2. M/s. Jolly Electronics (P) Ltd., is an authorized dealer of M/s. GG Micro Ltd., located and registered in
Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh. It has sold following items to Mr. Alla Rakha (a consumer):
Product Amount (Rs.)
Refrigerator (500 litres) taxable @ 18% 40,000/-
Stabilizer for refrigerator taxable @ 12% 5,000/-
1

LED television (42 inches) taxable @ 12% 30,000/-

Split air conditioner (2 Tons) taxable @ 28% 35,000/-
Stabilizer for air conditioner taxable @12%. 5,000/-
Total value 1,15,000/-
M/s. Jolly Electronics (P) Ltd. has given a single invoice, indicating price of each item separately to Mr.
Alla Rakha. Mr. Alla Rakha, has given a single cheque of Rs. 1,00,000/- for all the items as a
composite discounted price. State the type of supply and the tax rate applicable on the same.
(a) Composite supply; Highest tax rate applicable to split air conditioner, i.e. 28%
(b) Mixed supply; Highest tax rate applicable to split air conditioner, i.e. 28%
(c) Supply other than composite and mixed supply; Highest tax rate applicable to split air conditioner
i.e. 28%
(d) Supply other than composite and mixed supply; respective tax rate applicable to each item
3. Which of the following statements is correct while issuing a tax invoice?
(i) Place of supply in case of inter-State supply is not required to be mentioned
(ii) The power of attorney holder can sign the tax invoice in case the taxpayer or his authorised
representative has been travelling abroad
(iii) Quantity is not required to be mentioned in case of goods when goods are sold on “as is where is
basis”
(iv) Description of goods is not required to be given in case of mixed supply of goods
(a) (ii), (iii)
(b) (i), (ii), (iii)
(c) None of the above
(d) All of the above
4. Which of the following activity is taxable under GST?
(i) Supply of food by a hospital to patients (not admitted) or their attendants or visitors.
(ii) Transportation of passengers by non-air-conditioned railways
(iii) Services by a brand ambassador by way of folk dance performance where consideration charged
is Rs. 1,40,000.
(iv) Transportation of agriculture produce by air from one place to another place in India
(v) Services by way of loading, unloading, packing, storage or warehousing of rice
(vi) Service provided by GTA where consideration charged for transportation of goods for a single
carriage is Rs. 900
(a) (i), (v), (vi)
(b) (iii), (iv), (v)
(c) (i), (iii), (iv)
(d) (iv), (v)
5. In which of the following supplies of goods and services made exclusively to Government
departments, agencies etc. and persons notified under section 51 of the CGST Act, 2017, TDS is
required to be deducted?
2

(i) Health Department executed a contract with a local supplier to supply “medical grade oxygen” of
Rs.2.6 lakh (including GST) and is making full payment.
(ii) Government school is making a payment of Rs.3.5 Lakh to a supplier for supply of cooked food
as mid-day meal under a scheme sponsored by Central/State Government
(iii) Municipal Corporation of Kolkata purchases a heavy generator from a supplier in Delhi. Now, it is
making payment of Rs.5 lakh and IGST @18% on Rs.5 lakh for such purchase.
(iv) Finance Department is making a payment of Rs.3 lakh (including GST) to a supplier of ‘printing &
stationery’.
Assume all other conditions for deduction of TDS are fulfilled.
(a) (i), (ii) and (iii)
(b) (ii), (iii) and (iv)
(c) Only (i) and (ii)
(d) Only (iii) and (iv)
6. Rupam wishes to file an appeal to Appellate Tribunal. In which of the following cases, the Appellate
Tribunal cannot refuse to admit his appeal?
i. Amount of tax/ ITC or difference in tax/ difference in ITC involved exceeds Rs. 50,000
ii. Amount of fine, fee or penalty determined by the order exceeds Rs. 50,000
iii. Amount of tax/ ITC or difference in tax/ difference in ITC involved is Rs. 50,000
iv. Amount of fine, fee or penalty determined by the order is Rs. 50,000
v. Amount of tax/ ITC or difference in tax/ difference in ITC involved is less than Rs. 50,000
vi. Amount of fine, fee or penalty determined by the order is less than Rs. 50,000
(a) i. and ii.
(b) i. and iii.
(c) ii. and iv.
(d) v. and vi.
7. State which of the following statement is correct:
(i) Services by any artist by way of performance in folk or classical art forms of music, dance, or
theatre as a brand ambassador if the consideration charged for such performance is not more
than Rs. 150,000/- is exempt.
(ii) Services of life insurance business under Life micro-insurance product as approved by the
Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority, having minimum amount of cover of
Rs. 2,00,000/- is exempt
(iii) Service by an acquiring bank, to any person in relation to settlement of an amount upto
Rs. 2,500/- in a single transaction transacted through credit card, debit card, charge card or other
payment card service is exempt.
(iv) Services provided by a goods transport agency by way of transport in a goods carriage of, goods,
where gross amount charged for the transportation of goods on a consignment transported in a
single carriage is Rs. 2250/-, is exempt.
Your options are-
(a) (i)
3

(b) (ii), (iii)

(c) (ii), (iii), (iv)
8. M/s. Shahrukh Beedi Company (P) Ltd., is a manufacturer of cigarettes. It has been registered under
GST in the State of West Bengal.
The turnover of the company from the period April, 2018 to March, 2019 is Rs. 90,00,000/-. The
Excise duty paid on the cigarettes removed is Rs. 10,00,000/-. CGST and SGST paid on the cigarettes
is Rs. 18,00,000/-.
The company also recovered actual freight of Rs. 5,00,000/- on the supply of cigarettes so made
during the financial year 2018-19, and also charged CGST/ SGST thereon. The company paid RCM @
5% while availing the services of GTA of Rs. 5,00,000/-.
Compute the aggregate turnover of M/s. Shahrukh Beedi Company (P) Ltd.,
(a) Rs. 90,00,000/-
(b) Rs. 1,00,00,000/-
(c) Rs. 1,18,00,000/-
(d) Rs. 1,05,00,000/-
9. Mr. Prabhu Deva, registered under GST in Mumbai, is in the business of trading of marble handicraft
items domestically as also exporting the same. His annual turnover and input tax details are as
follows:
Turnover Tax paid on input tax
Taxable goods 1,25,00,000/- 12,50,000/-
Exported goods 75,00,000/- 5,50,000/-
Exempt goods 50,00,000/- 5,00,000/-
Mr. Prabhu Deva exported the goods under LUT without payment of IGST.
Now, Mr. Prabhu Deva seeks your help in calculating the amount of refund of ITC, which he is eligible
to claim.
(a) 18,00,000/-
(b) 6,75,000/-
(c) 5,40,000/-
(d) 6,90,000/-
10. State whether the following statements are true or false:
1. Zero rated supply means supply of any goods or services or both which attracts nil rate of tax.
2. Exempt supply means export of goods or services or both, or supply of goods or services or both
to a Special Economic Zone developer or a Special Economic Zone unit.
3. Non-taxable supply means supply of goods or services or both which is not leviable to tax under
CGST Act, 2017 but leviable to tax under the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.
4. ITC may be availed for making zero rated supply of exempt goods.
(a) False, False, False, True
(b) True, False, False, False

(c) True, True, False, False

(d) False, False, False, False
11. M/s. Raman Plastics is a manufacturer of plastic toys. It is registered person under GST in Shimla,
Himachal Pradesh.
It procures its raw materials from Punjab. During the month of April-2019, it purchased material of Rs.
35.00 Lakh and paid IGST thereon amounting to Rs. 6.30 Lakh. It supplied 30% of its production in the
State of Jammu and Kashmir, whereas the 70% of its production was supplied taxable @ 0.1% to a
merchant exporter during the month of Apr-2019.
The returns for the month of April, 2019 were duly filed in time. The last date upto which the taxpayer
can claim refund of input tax credit on account of inverted duty structure is
(a) 20-Apr-2021
(b) 20-May-2021
(c) 31-Mar-2022
(d) 20-Apr-2020
12. Banke Bihari (Pedewala), is a famous sweets maufacturer, located and registered in Mathura, Uttar
Pradesh. He received an order for 200 Kg. of sweets on 2nd May, 2019 from M/s. Ghoomghoom
Travels (P) Ltd., located and registered in same locality of Mathura for a total consideration of Rs.
1,00,000/-. All 200 Kg. sweets were delivered to M/s. Ghoomghoom Travels (P) Ltd. on 5th May, 2019,
but without invoice, as accountant of Mr. Banke Bihari was on leave on that day. However, the invoice
was raised for the same on 6th May, 2019, when the accountant joined the office after leave. Payment
in full was made on 7th May, 2019.
Determine the time of supply of goods in this case.
(a) 2nd May, 2019
(b) 5th May, 2019
(c) 6th May, 2019
(d) 7th May, 2019
13. Aflatoon Spares (P) Ltd., located and registered in Haryana, supplied spare parts (FOB basis) to Mr.
Laxmi Khurana, an unregistered person, located in Rajasthan. Mr. Laxmi Khurana booked the courier
himself with Black Dart Courier (P) Ltd., registered in Delhi for delivery in Rajasthan. Black Dart
Courier (P) Ltd. picked up the goods from Haryana and delivered the courier in Rajasthan while
passing through the State of Uttar Pradesh.
Determine the place of supply of service provided by Black Dart Courier (P) Ltd. to Mr. Laxmi Khurana:
(a) Haryana
(b) Delhi
(c) Rajasthan
(d) Uttar Pradesh
14. Sukanya, a registered supplier, failed to pay the GST amounting to Rs. 5,000 for the month of
January, 20XX. The proper officer imposed a penalty on Sukanya for failure to pay tax. Sukanya
believes that it is a minor breach and in accordance with the provisions of section 126 of the CGST
Act, 2017, no penalty is imposable for minor breaches of tax regulations. In this regard, which of the
following statements is true?

(a) Penalty is leviable on Sukanya since the breach is considered as a ‘minor breach’ only if amou nt
of tax involved is less than Rs. 5,000
(b) Penalty is not leviable on Sukanya since the breach is considered as a ‘minor breach’ if amount
of tax involved is upto Rs. 5,000
(c) Penalty is leviable on Sukanya since the breach is considered as a ‘minor breach’ on ly if amount
of tax involved is Nil.
(d) None of the above.
15. Mr. A, a sole proprietor, has to appear before the Appellate Authority. He decides to appear by an
authorized representative. Which of the following persons can be appointed as ‘authorized
representative’ of Mr. A under GST law?
(a) Sohan, his son, who has been dismissed from a Government service lately.
(b) Rohan, a Company Secretary, who has been adjudged insolvent.
(c) Mukul, a practicing High Court advocate.
(d) All of the above.
16. Which of the following statement(s) is/are correct?
(i) Special exemption under section 25 of the Customs Act is granted by issuing a notification;
(ii) General exemption under section 25 of the Customs Act is granted by issuing an order;
(iii) Special exemption is required to be published in official gazette;
(iv) General exemption is not required to be published in official gazette.
(a) All of above
(b) None of above
(c) Both (i) and (ii)
(d) (ii) and (iv)
17. Countervailing duty under section 9 of the Customs Tariff Act shall not be levied unless it is
determined that:
(i) Subsidy relates to export performance;
(ii) Subsidy relates to use of domestic goods over imported goods in export article;
(iii) Subsidy is conferred on all persons engaged in the manufacture of export article.
(a) All of above
(b) Only (iii)
(c) (ii) and (iii)
(d) (i) and (ii)
(a) Higher of margin of dumping or injury margin;
(b) Lower of margin of dumping or injury margin;
(c) Higher of export price or normal value;
(d) Lower of export price or normal value

19. Read the following and choose the correct option:

i. Indian customs waters extend up to 12 nautical miles;
ii. Indian customs waters extend up to 24 nautical miles;
iii. Indian customs waters extend up to exclusive economic zone of India;
iv. Indian customs waters include territorial waters and extend up to 200 nautical miles.
(a) Only (ii)
(b) (iii) and (iv)
(c) (ii) and (iv)
(d) Only (iv)
20. The taxable event under the Customs Act, 1962 is:
(a) Import of goods into India/ export of goods from India;
(b) Supply of goods into India/ Supply of goods from India to outside India;
(c) Sale of goods into India/ Sale of goods outside India;
(d) Manufacture of goods into India for supply outside India.

1. Power Engineering Pvt. Ltd., a registered supplier, is engaged in providing expert maintenance and
repair services for large power plants that are in the nature of immovable property, situated all over
India. The company has its Head Office at Bangalore, Karnataka and branch offices in other States.
The work is done in the following manner.
- The company has self-contained mobile workshops, which are container trucks fitted out for
carrying out the repairs. The trucks are equipped with items like repair equipments,
consumables, tools, parts etc. to handle a wide variety of repair work.
- The truck is sent to the client location for carrying out the repair work. Depending upon the
repairs to be done, the equipment, consumables, tools, parts etc. are used from the stock of such
items carried in the truck.
- In some cases, a stand-alone machine is also sent to the client’s premises in such truck for
carrying out the repair work.
- The customer is billed after the completion of the repair work depending upon the nature of the
work and the actual quantity of consumables, parts etc. used in the repair work.
- Sometimes the truck is sent to the company’s own location in other State(s) from where it is
further sent to client locations for repairs.
Work out the GST liability [CGST & SGST or IGST, as the case may be] of Power Engineering Pvt.
Ltd., Bangalore on the basis of the facts as described, read with the following data for the month of
November 20XX.
S. Particulars Rs.
No.
A. Truck sent to own location in Tamil Nadu

B. Truck sent to a client location in Tamil Nadu for carrying out repairs. Stand-
alone machine is also sent in the truck to client location for repairs
(i) Value of items contained in the truck – Rs. 2,85,000
(ii) Value of stand-alone machine - Rs. 4,00,000
(iii) Value of truck - Rs. 20,00,000
(Billing for repairs to be done afterwards depending upon the actual items used)
C. Truck sent to a client location in Karnataka for carrying out repairs
(Billing for repairs to be done afterwards depending upon the actual items
used)
D. Invoices raised for repair work carried out in Tamil Nadu [including the invoice 70,00,000
for repair work done in ‘B’] -
E. Invoices raised for repair work carried out in Karnataka [including the invoice 12,00,000
for repair work done in ‘C’]
Also, specify the document(s), if any, which need to be issued by Power Engineering Pvt. Ltd.,
Bangalore for the above transactions.
All the given amounts are exclusive of GST, wherever applicable. Assume the rates of taxes to be as
under:
Items used for repairs
Container truck, Stand-alone machines
CGST – 2.5% SGST – 2.5% IGST – 5%
Works contract for repairs and maintenance of immovable property
2. (a) Determine whether GST is payable in case of each of the following independent services
provided by the registered persons:
(1) Fees charged from office staff for in-house personality development course conducted by
Markanday College - Rs. 80,000. Markanday College provides education as a part of a
curriculum for obtaining an engineering degree recognised by law.
(2) Bus fees collected from students by Starward College - Rs. 3,500 per month. Starward
College provides education as a part of a curriculum for obtaining an engineering degree
recognised by law.
(3) Housekeeping service provided in the Smart Kids school, a play school by M/s. Spick &
Span - Rs. 25,000 per month.
(4) Global link supplied ''Tracing Alphabets", an online educational journal, to Kidzee School -
Rs. 4,000. The Kidzee School used the same for its students of UKG class. (5 Marks)
(b) Mr. X, a money changer, has exchanged US $ 10,000 to Indian rupees @ Rs. 64 per US $.
Mr. X wants to value the supply in accordance with rule 32(2)(b) of CGST Rules.
Determine the value of supply made by Mr. X. (4 Marks)
(c) From the following particulars, calculate total customs duty and integrated tax payable:

(i) Date of presentation of bill of entry: 20.6.20XX [Rate of BCD 20%; Inter-bank exchange
rate: Rs. 61.60 and rate notified by CBIC Rs. 70].
(ii) Date of arrival of aircraft in India: 30.6.20XX [Rate of BCD 10%; Inter-bank exchange rate:
Rs. 61.80 and rate notified by CBIC Rs. 73.00].
(iii) Rate of Integrated tax leviable under section 3(7) of the Customs Tariff Act: 12%. Ignore
GST Compensation Cess.
(iv) CIF value 2,000 US Dollars; Air freight 500 US Dollars, Insurance cost 100 US Dollars
[Landing charges not ascertainable].
(v) Social Welfare Surcharge 10%. (5 Marks)
3. (a) I buy a set of modular furniture from a retail store. Invoice is issued to me and I make the
payment. The furniture is to be delivered to me later in the week when a technician is available
to assemble and install it. The next day the rate of tax applicable to modular furniture is revised
upward, and the store sends me a supplementary invoice with the delivery note accompanying
the furniture to collect the differential amount of tax.
Is this correct on store’s part? (4 Marks)
(b) The place of supply in relation to immovable property is the location of immovable property.
Suppose a road is constructed from Delhi to Mumbai covering multiple states.
What will be the place of supply of construction services? (5 Marks)
(c) An importer imported certain inputs for manufacture of final product. A small portion of the
imported inputs were damaged in transit and could not be used in the manufacture of the final
product. An exemption notification was in force providing exemption in respect of specified raw
Briefly examine whether the importer could claim the benefit of the aforesaid notification in
respect of the entire lot of the inputs imported including those that were damaged in transit.
(5 Marks)
4. (a) A taxable person has mistakenly paid CGST and SGST for an inter-State supply. Subsequently,
when he discovers the same, can he adjust the IGST liability against the wrongly paid CGST and
SGST? (3 Marks)
(b) The aggregate turnover of Sangri Services Ltd., Delhi exceeded Rs. 20 lakh on 12th August. He
applied for registration on 3rd September and was granted the registration certificate on 6 th
September. You are required to advice Sangri Services Ltd. as to what is the effective date of
registration in its case. It has also sought your advice regarding period for issuance of Revised
Tax Invoices. (6 Marks)
(c) Determine the customs duty payable under the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 including the safeguard
duty of 30% under section 8B of the said Act with the following details available on hand :
Assessable value of Sodium Nitrite imported from a developing country Rs. 30,00,000
from 26th February, 2017 to 25th February, 2018 (both days inclusive)
Share of imports of Sodium Nitrite from the developing country against 4%
total imports of Sodium Nitrite to India
Basic custom duty 10%
Integrated tax under section 3(7) of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. 12%
Social welfare surcharge 10%
Note: Ignore GST compensation cess. (5 Marks)
9

5. (a) Mr. X, an unregistered person under GST purchases the goods supplied by Mr. Y who is a
registered person without receiving a tax invoice from Mr. Y and thus helps in tax evasion by Mr.
Y. What disciplinary action may be taken by tax authorities to curb such type of cases and on
whom?
Suppose, in the above case, a disciplinary action is taken against Mr. X and an adhoc penalty of
Rs. 20,000/- is imposed by issue of SCN without describing contravention for which penalty is
going to be imposed and without mentioning the provisions under which penalty is going to be
imposed. Should Mr. X proceed to pay for penalty or challenge SCN issued by department?
(5 Marks)
(b) On 05.07.20XX, a show cause notice for Rs. 5,00,000 was issued to Mr. Janak Singhal
demanding short payment of GST of Rs. 4,50,000 for the month of January, 20XX and also
interest of Rs. 50,000.
Mr. Janak Singhal raised objections and after personal hearing on 30.08.20XX, adjudicating
authority passed the final order for Rs. 3,50,000 for GST, without any reference with regard to
payment of interest.
Mr. Janak Singhal deposited the tax of Rs. 3,50,000 on 02.09.20XX and informed the department
on the same day. Subsequently, on 15.09.20XX, department demanded payment of interest of
Rs. 60,000 on GST of Rs. 3,50,000.
Mr. Janak Singhal is not ready to pay any interest. His contention is that he is not liable for
interest because he deposited all the amount specified in the final adjudication order.
Examine with a brief note the validity of the action taken by the Department with reference to
provisions of the CGST Act, 2017. (4 Marks)
(c) Mr. Sujoy, an Indian entrepreneur, went to London to explore new business opportunities on
01.04.2018. His wife also joined him in London after three months. The following details are
submitted by them with the Customs authorities on their return to India on 15.04.2019:
(a) used personal effects worth Rs. 80,000,
(b) 2 music systems each worth Rs. 50,000,
(c) the jewellery brought by Mr. Sujoy worth Rs. 48,000 [20 grams] and the jewellery brought by
his wife worth Rs. 96,000 [40 grams].
With reference to Baggage Rules, 2016, determine whether Mr. and Mrs. Sujoy will be required to
pay any customs duty? (5 Marks)
6. (a) Briefly discuss the modes of recovery of tax available to the proper officer. (4 Marks)
(b) In what cases, assessment order passed by proper officer may be withdrawn? (5 Marks)
(c) With reference to drawback on re-export of duty paid imported goods under section 74 of the
Customs Act, 1962, answer in brief the following questions:
(i) What is the time limit for re-exportation of goods as such?
(ii) What is the rate of duty drawback if the goods are exported without use?
(iii) Is duty drawback allowed on re-export of wearing apparel without use? (5 Marks)
10


MOCK TEST PAPER 1
FINAL (NEW) COURSE: GROUP – I
SUGGESTED ANSWERS
Division A
1. (c)
2. (d)
3. (c)
4. (c)
5. (d)
6. (a)
7. (d)
8. (d)
9. (b)
10. (a)
11. (b)
12. (b)
13. (a)
14. (a)
15. (c)
16. (b)
17. (d)
18. (b)
19. (b)
20. (a)
Division B
1. Computation of GST Liability of Power Engineering Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore for the month of
November 20XX
S.No. Particulars Rs.
A. Items sent in container truck to own location in Tamil Nadu - IGST @ 12% 36,000
[Note 1]
Container truck sent to own location in Tamil Nadu [Note 2] -
B. Stand-alone machine sent in container truck to client location in Tamil Nadu, -
for carrying out repairs [Note 3]
Container truck sent to client location in Tamil Nadu [Note 3] -
Items sent in container truck to client location in Tamil Nadu, for carrying out -
repairs [Note 4]
1

C. Container truck sent to client location in Karnataka [Note 3] -

Items sent in container truck to client location in Karnataka, for carrying out -
repairs [Note 4]
D. Invoices raised for repair work carried out in Tamil Nadu: IGST @ 18% [Note 12,60,000
5 and Note 6]
E. Invoices raised for repair work carried out in Karnataka: CGST 9% + SGST 2,16,000
9% [Note 5 and Note 7]
Notes:
(1) Movement of goods without any consideration to a ‘distinct person’ as specified in section 25(4)
of the CGST Act, 2017 is deemed to be a supply in terms of Schedule I of the said Act. The
purchase value is taken as taxable value, being the open market value in terms of rule 28(a) of
the CGST Rules 2017. (However, if the regional office is eligible to take full input tax credit, any
value may be declared in the tax invoice and that will be taken to be the open market value in
terms of the second proviso to the same rule.)
In the given case-
• the place of supply of items contained in the truck is the location of such goods at the time
at which the movement of goods terminates for delivery to the recipient i.e., Tamil Nadu in
terms of section 10(1)(a) of the IGST Act, 2017.
Therefore, the given supply of items is an inter-State supply as the location of the supplier and
the place of supply are in two different States [Section 7(1)(a) of IGST Ac t, 2017]. Thus, the
supply is leviable to IGST in terms of section 5(1) of the IGST Act, 2017.
Since the activity is a supply, a tax invoice is to be issued by Power Engineering Pvt. Ltd. in
terms of section 31(1)(a) of the CGST Act, 2017 for sending the items to its own location in Tamil
Nadu.
(2) As per section 25(4) of the CGST Act, 2017, a person who has obtained more than one
registration, whether in one State or Union territory or more than one State or Union territory
shall, in respect of each such registration, be treated as ‘distinct persons’.
Schedule I to the CGST Act, 2017 specifies situations where activities are to be treated as supply
even if made without consideration. Supply of goods and/or services between ‘distinct persons’
as specified in section 25 of the CGST Act, 2017, when made in the course or furtherance of
business is one such activity included in Schedule I under para 2.
However, in view of the GST Council’s recommendation, it has been clarified that the inter-State
movement of various modes of conveyance between ‘distinct persons’ as specified in section
25(4), not involving further supply of such conveyance, including trucks carrying goods or
passengers or both; or for repairs and maintenance, may be treated ‘neither as a supply of goods
nor supply of service’ and therefore, will not be leviable to IGST. Applicable CGST/SGST/IGST,
however, shall be leviable on repairs and maintenance done for such conveyance [Circular No.
1/1/2017 IGST dated 07.07.2017].
Since the activity is not a supply, tax invoice is not required to be issued by Power Engineering
Pvt. Ltd. However, a delivery challan is to be issued by the company in terms of rule 55(1)(c) of
CGST Rules, 2017 for sending the truck to its own location in Tamil Nadu.
(3) Supply of goods without consideration is deemed to be a supply inter alia when the goods are
supplied to a ‘distinct person’. However, in this case, stand-alone machine and container truck

are moved to client location and not between ‘distinct persons’. Hence, the same will fall outside
the scope of definition of supply and will not be leviable to GST.
Here again, a delivery challan is to be issued in terms of rule 55(1)(c) of CGST Rules, 2017 for
sending the stand-alone machines and container truck to client location.
(4) As per section 2(119) of the CGST Act, 2017, ‘works contract’ means a contract for, inter alia,
repair, maintenance of any immovable property wherein transfer of property in goods (whether as
goods or in some other form) is involved in the execution of such contract.
In this case, the supplier provides maintenance and repair services for power plants that are in
the nature of immovable property and uses consumables and parts, wherever necessary, for the
repairs. Hence, the contract is that of a works contract.
Further, as per section 2(30) of the CGST Act, 2017, a works contract is a ‘composite supply’ as
it consists of taxable supplies of both goods and services which are naturally bundled and
supplied in conjunction with each other. The composite supply of works contract is treated as
supply of service in terms of para 6(a) of Schedule II to the CGST Act, 2017.
The items used in relation to the repair and maintenance work could be consumables or could be
identifiable items/parts. In either case, the transfer of property in goods is incidental to a
composite supply of works contract service. T hus, the value of the items actually used in the
repairs will be included in the invoice raised for the service and will be charged to tax at that point
of time.
Here again, a delivery challan is to be issued in terms of rule 55(1)(c) of CGST Rules, 2017 for
sending the items for carrying out the repairs.
(5) The activity is a composite supply of works contract, which is treated as supply of service. As per
section 8(a) of the CGST Act, 2017, a composite supply is treated as a supply of the principal
supply involved therein and charged to tax accordingly.
Since the activity is a supply of service, a tax invoice is to be issued by Power Engineering Pvt.
Ltd. in terms of section 31(2) of the CGST Act, 2017.
(6) In the given case-
• the place of supply of works contract services relating to the power plant (immovable
property) is the location at which the immovable property is located i.e., Tamil Nadu in terms
of section 12(3)(a) of the IGST Act, 2017.
Therefore, the given supply is an inter-State supply as the location of the supplier and the place
of supply are in two different States [Section 7(1)(a) of IGST Act, 2017]. Thus, the supply will be
leviable to IGST in terms of section 5(1) of the IGST Act, 2017.
(7) In the given case, the location of the supplier and the place of supply of works contract services
are within the same State. Therefore, the given supply is an intra-State supply in terms of
section 8(1) of IGST Act, 2017 and thus, chargeable to CGST and SGST.
2. (a) (1) As per Notification No. 12/2017 CT (R) dated 28.06.2017, services provided by an
educational institution to its students, faculty and staff are exempt from GST. Educational
Institution has been defined to mean, inter alia, an institution providing services by way of
education as a part of a curriculum for obtaining a qualification rec ognised by any law for
the time being in force.
Since Markanday College provides education as a part of a curriculum for obtaining an
engineering degree recognised by law, the services provided by it to its staff by way of
conducting personality development course would be exempt from GST.

(2) As Starward College is an educational institution, the transport services provided by it to its
students would be exempt from GST.
(3) As per Notification No. 12/2017 CT (R) dated 28.06.2017, services provided to an
educational institution, by way of, inter alia, house-keeping services performed in such
educational institution are exempt from GST. However, such an exemption is available only
when the said services are provided to a pre-school education and a higher secondary
school or equivalent.
Therefore, house-keeping services provided to Smart Kids Play School would be exempt
from GST.
educational institution by way of supply of online educational journals or periodicals is
exempt from GST. However, such an exemption is available only when the said services
are provided to an educational institution providing education as a part of a curriculum for
obtaining a qualification recognised by any law for the time being in force.
Therefore, GST is payable in case of supply of online journal to students of UKG class of
Kidzee School.
(b) As per rule 32(2)(b) of CGST Rules, the value in relation to the supply of foreign currency,
including money changing, is deemed to be-
(i) 1% of the gross amount of currency exchanged for an amount up to
Rs. 1,00,000, subject to a minimum amount of Rs. 250;
(ii) Rs. 1,000 and 0.5% of the gross amount of currency exchanged for an amount exceeding
Rs. 1,00,000 and up to Rs. 10,00,000.
Therefore, the value of supply, made by Mr. X, under rule 32(2)(b) of CGST Rules is
computed as under:
Particulars Rs. Rs.
Value of currency exchanged in Indian rupees [Rs. 64 x US $ 10,000] 6,40,000
Upto Rs. 1,00,000 1,000
For Rs. 5,40,000 [0.50% x Rs. 5,40,000] 2,700
Value of supply 3,700
(c) Computation of total customs duty and integrated tax payable
Particulars Amount
CIF value 2000 US Dollars
Less: Freight 500
Insurance 100 600 US Dollars
FOB Value 1400 US Dollars
Add: Air Freight [Note1] 280
Insurance (actual amount) 100 380 US Dollars
1780 US Dollars
Rs.
Value @ Rs. 70.00 [Note 2] 1,24,600.00
Assessable Value 1,24,600.00
Basic Custom Duty @ 10% (a) [Note 3] 12,460.00
Add: Social Welfare Surcharge @ 10% on 1,24,600 (b) 1,246.00
4

Sub-total 1,38,306.00
Integrated tax under section 3(7) (12% on Rs. 1,38,306) (c) 16,596.72
[Note 4]
Total duty and integrated tax (a +b + c) (rounded off) 30,303
Notes:
(1) If the goods are imported by air, the freight cannot exceed 20% of FOB price [Fifth proviso
to Rule 10(2) of the Customs (Determination of Value of Imported Goods) Rules, 2007].
(2) Rate of exchange notified by CBIC on the date of presentation of bill of entry would be the
applicate rate. [Proviso to Section 14(1) of the Customs Act, 1962].
(3) Rate of duty would be the rate as prevalent on the date of filing of bill of entry or arrival of
aircraft, whichever is later [proviso to section 15 of the Customs Act, 1962].
(4) Integrated tax leviable under section 3(7) of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 is levied on the
sum total of the assessable value of the imported goods, customs duties and applicable
social welfare surcharge.
3. (a) No, the store is not correct in issuing supplementary invoice with revised rate of tax. The revised
rate of tax is not applicable to the transaction, as the issuance of invoice as well as receipt of
payment occurred before the supply. Therefore, in terms of section 14(b)(ii), the time of supply is
earlier of the two events namely, issuance of invoice or receipt of payment, both of which are
before the change in rate of tax, and thus, the old rate of tax remains applicable.
(b) Where the immovable property is located in more than one State, the supply of service is treated
as made in each of the States in proportion to the value for services separately collected or
determined, in terms of the contract or agreement entered into in this regard or, in the absence of
such contract or agreement, on such other reasonable basis as may be prescribed in this behalf
[Explanation to section 12(3) for domestic supplies].
In the absence of a contract or agreement between the supplier and recipient of services in this
regard, the proportionate value of services supplied in different States/Union territories (where
the immovable property is located) is computed on the basis of the area of the immovable
property lying in each State/ Union territories [Rule 4 of the IGST Rules].
cannot be denied in respect of goods which are intended for use for manufacture of the final
product but cannot be so used due to shortage or leakage.
leakage and loss on account of damage. The benefit of said exemption cannot be denied as
inputs were intended for use in the manufacture of final product but could not be so used due to
4. (a) Section 77, inter alia, stipulates that a registered person who has paid the Central tax and State
tax or, as the case may be, the central tax and the Union territory tax on a transaction considered
by him to be an intra-State supply, but which is subsequently held to be an inter-State supply,
shall be refunded the amount of taxes so paid in such manner and subject to such conditions as
may be prescribed.

The IGST liability cannot be adjusted against the CGST and SGST wrongly paid.
(b) As per section 25 read with CGST Rules, 2017, where an applicant submits application for
registration within 30 days from the date he becomes liable to registration, effective date of
registration is the date on which he becomes liable to registration. Since, Sangri Services Ltd.’s
turnover exceeded Rs. 20 lakh on 12th August, it became liable to registration on same day.
Further, it applied for registration within 30 days of so becoming liable to registration, the
effective date of registration is the date on which he becomes liable to registration, i.e. 12th
August.
As per section 31 read with CGST Rules, 2017, every registered person who has been granted
registration with effect from a date earlier than the date of issuance of certificate of registration to
him, may issue Revised Tax Invoices. Revised Tax Invoices shall be issued within 1 month from
the date of issuance of certificate of registration. Revised Tax Invoices shall be issued within 1
month from the date of issuance of registration in respect of taxable supplies effected during the
period starting from the effective date of registration till the date of issuance of certificate of
registration.
Therefore, in the given case, Sangri Services Ltd. has to issue the Revised Tax Invoices in
respect of taxable supplies effected during the period starting from the effective date of
registration (12th August) till the date of issuance of certificate of registration (6 th September)
within 1 month from the date of issuance of certificate of registration, i.e. on or before
6th October.
(c) Computation of customs duty and integrated tax payable thereon
Particular Amount (Rs.)
Assessable value of sodium nitrite imported 30,00,000
Add: Basic custom duty @ 10% (Rs. 30,00,000 × 10%) 3,00,000
Safeguard duty @ 30% on Rs. 30,00,000 [Safeguard duty is imposable in the
given case since share of imports of sodium nitrite from the developing country is 9,00,000
more than 3% of the total imports of sodium nitrite into India (Proviso to section
8B(1) of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975)]
Social welfare surcharge @ 10% x Rs. 3,00,000 30,000
Total 42,30,000
Integrated tax leviable under section 3(7) of Customs Tariff Act (Rs. 42,30,000 × 5,07,600
12%) [Note]
(Rs. 3,00,000 + Rs. 9,00,000+ Rs. 30,000+ Rs. 5,07,600)
Note: It has been clarified by DGFT vide Guidance note that value for calculation of integrated
tax shall also include safeguard duty amount.
5. (a) Both Mr. X and Mr. Y will be offender and will be liable to penalty as under:
Mr. X – Penalty under section 122(3) which may extend to Rs. 25,000/-;
Mr. Y – Penalty under section 122(1), which will be higher of following, namely (i) Rs. 10,000/- or
(ii) 100% of tax evaded.
The levy of penalty is subject to a certain disciplinary regime which is based on jurisprudence,
principles of natural justice and principles governing international trade and agreements. Such
general discipline is enshrined in section 126 of the Act. Accordingly—
6

(i) no penalty is to be imposed without issuance of a show cause notice and proper hearing in
the matter, affording an opportunity to the person proceeded against to rebut the allegations
levelled against him,
(ii) the penalty is to depend on the totality of the facts and circumstances of the c as e, t h e
penalty imposed is to be commensurate with the degree and severity of b r e ach o f t h e
provisions of the law or the rules alleged,
(iii) the nature of the breach is to be specified clearly in the order imposing the penalty,
(iv) the provisions of the law under which the penalty has been imposed is to be specified.
Since SCN issued to Mr. X suffers from lack of clarity about nature of breach which has taken
place and about provision of law under which penalty has been imposed, SCN issued by
department may be challenged.
(b) As per section 75 of the CGST Act, 2017, the interest on the tax short paid has to be paid
whether or not the same is specified in the order determining the tax liability.
Thus, in view of the same, Mr. Janak Singhal will have to pay the interest even though the same
is not specified in the final adjudication order. His contention that he is not liable for interest
because he deposited all the amount specified in the final adjudication order is not valid in law.
However, the amount of interest demanded in the order cannot be in excess of the amount
specified in the notice.
Therefore, in the given case, Department cannot demand the interest in excess of the amount
specified in the notice, which will be Rs. 50,000.
(c) As per rule 3 of the Baggage Rules, 2016, an Indian resident arriving from any country other than
Nepal, Bhutan or Myanmar, shall be allowed clearance free of duty articles in his bona fide
baggage, that is to say, used personal effects and travel souvenirs; and articles [other than
certain specified articles], upto the value of Rs. 50,000 if these are carried on the person or in the
accompanied baggage of the passenger.
Thus, there is no customs duty on used personal effects and travel souvenirs and general duty
free baggage allowance is Rs. 50,000 per passenger. Thus, duty liability of Mr. Sujoy and his wife
is nil for the used personal effects worth Rs. 80,000 and 2 music systems each worth Rs. 50,000.
As per rule 5 of the Baggage Rules, 2016, the jewellery allowance is as follows:
Jewellery brought by Duty free allowance
Gentleman Passenger Jewellery upto a weight of 20 grams with a value cap of Rs.
50,000
Lady Passenger Jewellery upto a weight of 40 grams with a value cap of Rs.
1,00,000
However, the jewellery allowance is applicable only to a passenger residing abroad for more than
1 year.
Consequently, there is no duty liability on the jewellery brought by Mr. Sujoy as he had stayed
abroad for period exceeding 1 year and weight of the jewellery brought by him is 20 grams with a
value less than Rs. 50,000.
However, his wife is not eligible for this additional jewellery allowance as she had stayed abroad
for a period of less than a year. Thus, she has to pay customs duty on the entire amount of

jewellery brought by her as she has already exhausted the general duty free baggage allowance
of Rs. 50,000 allowed under rule 3.
6. (a) The proper officer may recover the dues in following manner:
(a) Deduction of dues from the amount owned by the tax authorities payable to such person.
(b) Recovery by way of detaining and selling any goods belonging to such person;
(c) Recovery from other person, from whom money is due or may become due to such person
or who holds or may subsequently hold money for or on account of such person, to pay to
the credit of the Central or a State Government;
(d) Distrain any movable or immovable property belonging to such person, until the amount
payable is paid. If the dues not paid within 30 days, the said property is to be sold and with
the proceeds of such sale the amount payable and cost of sale shall be recovered.
(e) Through the Collector of the district in which such person owns any property or resides or
carries on his business, as if it was an arrear of land revenue.
(f) By way of an application to the appropriate Magistrate who in turn shall proceed to recover
the amount as if it were a fine imposed by him.
(g) By enforcing the bond/instrument executed under this Act or any rules or regulations made
thereunder.
(h) CGST arrears can be recovered as an arrear of SGST and vice versa [Section 79].
(b) Assessment Order passed by proper officer may be withdrawn in the following cases:-
(i) Assessment of Non-filers of return – The best judgment order passed by the Proper Officer
under section 62 of CGST Act shall automatically stand withdrawn if the taxable person
furnishes a valid return for the default period (i.e. files the return and pays the tax as
assessed by him), within thirty days of the receipt of the best judgment assessment order
(ii) Summary Assessment – A taxable person against whom a summary assessment order has
been passed can apply for its withdrawal to the jurisdictional Additional/Joint Commissioner
within thirty days of the date of receipt of the order. If the said officer finds the order
erroneous, he can withdraw it and direct the proper officer to carry out determination of tax
liability in terms of section 73 or 74 of CGST Act. The Additional/Joint Commissioner can
follow a similar course of action on his own motion if he finds the summary assessment
order to be erroneous.
(c) (i) As per section 74 of the Customs Act, 1962, the duty paid imported goods are required to
be entered for export within two years from the date of payment of duty on the importation.
This period can be extended by CBIC if the importer shows sufficient reason for not
exporting the goods within two years.
(ii) If duty paid imported goods are exported without use, then 98% of such duty is re-paid as
drawback.
(iii) Yes, duty drawback is allowed when wearing apparels are re-exported without being used.
However, Notification No. 19/65 Cus dated 06.02.1965 as amended provides that if wearing
apparels have been used after their importation into India, drawback of import duty paid
thereon shall not be allowed when they are exported out of India.

Test Series: May, 2020
MOCK TEST PAPER 1
Notes:
note.
(iii) All questions should be answered on the basis of position of (i) GST law as amended up to 31 stOctober,
2019 and (ii) Customs law as amended by the Finance Act, 2019 and notifications/circulars issued till
31st October, 2019.
necessarily be the actual rates leviable on those goods and services. The r ates of customs duty are
one of the four options given. All questions are compulsory.
Each MCQ under Question No. 1 & 2 carries 2 Marks each
1. M/s. SV Enterprises (P) Ltd. is a pharmaceuticals company engaged in the manufacturing of medicines.
It has its head office in Rajasthan being registered under GST. It primary sells two products in the market
which are as under:
(i) A (Taxable at 18%)
(ii) B (Taxable at 28%)
From head office (HO) it makes sales on the basis of orders received from dealers and its branches.
Total sales during the month of February is given below:
A B
Inter-State (Rs.) Intra-State(Rs.) Inter- Intra-
State(Rs.) State(Rs.)
50,00,000/- (including branch transfers 50,00,000/- 50,00,000/- 30,00,000/-
The company transferred product A to its branch situated in Mumbai for Rs. 10,00,000/ -. The open
market value of product A was not known at the time of transfer, but the goods of like kind and quantity
were sold at Rs. 12,00,000/-. Cost of product A is Rs. 8,00,000/-. Further, the branch also deals in
product A and product B only.
The company purchases its raw material worth Rs. 60,00,000 taxable @18% for product A from a
supplier located at Haryana and imported raw material worth Rs. 40,00,000 taxable @ 28% for product
B from U.S.A based vendor.

Based on above, answer following questions: -
i. What shall be the GST paid by M/s. SV Enterprises (P) Ltd. through Electronic Cash Ledger ?
a. IGST: Rs.1,00,000/-, CGST: Rs. 8,70,000/-, SGST: Rs. 8,70,000/-
b. IGST: Rs. 11,20,000, CGST: Rs. 8,70,000/-, SGST: Rs. 8,70,000/-
c. IGST: Rs. 12,20,000/-, CGST: Rs. 8,70,000/-, SGST: Rs. 8,70,000/-
d. IGST: Nil, CGST: Rs. 8,70,000/-, SGST: Rs. 8,70,000/-
ii. Suppose Product A is exempt from GST, what shall be the aggregate turnover of SV Enterprise?
a. Rs. 1,80,00,000
b. Rs. 80,00,000/-
c. Rs. 2,20,00,000/-
d. Rs. 1,40,00,000
iii. What shall be the value of supply of product “A” transferred to its branch in Mumbai?
a. Rs. 10,00,000/-
b. Rs. 12,00,000/-
c. Rs. 8,00,000/-
d. Rs. 8,80,000/-
iv. Suppose out of imported raw material amounting to Rs. 40,00,000/-, raw material amounting to Rs.
10,00,000/- was sold to another local customer before clearance for home consumption. What shall
be the net GST liability in this case?
a. IGST- Rs. 3,80,000/-, CGST-Rs. 8,70,000/-, SGST- Rs. 8,70,000/-
b. IGST- Rs. 1,00,000/-, CGST-Rs. 8,70,000/-, SGST-Rs. 8,70,000/-
c. IGST- Rs. 12,20,000/-, CGST-Rs. 8,70,000/-, SGST-Rs. 8,70,000/-
d. IGST- Rs. 20,60,000/-, CGST-Rs. 8,70,000/-, SGST-Rs. 8,70,000/-
v. If the payment for Product A was received on 25.02.20XX from one of the customer s, goods
supplied on 28.02.20XX and invoice issued on 3.03.20XX, what shall be the time of supply in this
case?
a. 25.02.20XX
b. 28.02.20XX
c. 3.03.20XX
d. 20.03.20XX
2. Diwakar (P) Ltd., registered in Delhi, is engaged in trading of cement as well as providing services by
way of renting of commercial properties. On 02.01.20XX, it received a contract of 1,000 kg cement from
Pakija (P) Ltd., registered in Punjab. Pakija (P) Ltd. directed Diwakar (P) Ltd. to send the consignment
to Gajab & Sons, registered in Gujarat. Diwakar (P) Ltd. prepared the consignment on 04.01.20XX and
dispatched the same on the next day from his warehouse in Gurugram, Haryana. The invoice was also
issued on 5.01.20XX. On 07.01.20XX, it received the cheque and accountant entered the payment in
books of accounts. However, he presented the cheque in bank on 14.01.20XX which was credited in

bank account on 15.01.20XX. In the meanwhile, on 10.01.20XX, the rate of tax on cement was reduced
from 28% to 18%.
On inspection of goods it was found that there is some deficiency in quality of goods and therefore, the
deficit goods were returned to Diwakar (P) Ltd. Diwakar (P) Ltd. issued credit note for the same on
20.01.20XX.
Diwakar (P) Ltd. let out property and received rent for the month of January from Pakija (P) Ltd. on
10.01.20XX. However, as per the contract entered, the payments should have been received by 7 th of
every month.
Based on the above scenario, Diwakar (P) Ltd., wants to seek your advice on the following issues:
i. What will be the time of supply and rate of tax to be charged in respect of 1,000 kg of cement?
(a) 05.01.20XX; 28%
(b) 07.01.20XX; 28%
(c) 14.01.20XX; 18%
(d) 15.01.20XX; 18%
ii. What will be the time of supply and rate of tax to be charged if the payment is credited into bank
account on 12.01.20XX?
(a) 05.01.20XX; 28%
(b) 07.01.20XX; 28%
(c) 12.01.20XX; 28%
(d) 12.01.20XX; 18%
iii. What will be rate of tax to be charged for the credit note issued in respect of deficient goods?
(a) 28%
(b) 18%
(c) No tax to be charged on credit note
(d) Either (a) or (b)
iv. What is the place of supply in respect of transaction between Diwakar (P) Ltd. and Pakija (P) Ltd ,
and Pakija (P) Ltd. and Gajab& Sons?
(a) Delhi, Punjab
(b) Punjab, Gujarat
(c) Haryana, Punjab
(d) Haryana, Gujarat
v. Diwakar (P) Ltd. is not issuing any invoice in respect of the services provided by way of renting of
commercial properties. What shall be the last date for issuance of invoice?
(a) 10.01.20XX
(b) 07.01.20XX
(c) Either (a) or (b) whichever is earlier

(d) Either (a) or (b) whichever is later
3. Which of the following statements is true?
1. Services provided by Government ITIs to individual trainees are exempt from GST.
2. Services provided by the State Governments and private service providers by way of transportation
of patients in ambulance are exempt from GST.
3. Services of renting of shops in a hospital are exempt from GST being health care services.
4. Services provided by Police to PSUs are taxable.
(a) 1, 2 & 4.
(b) 2, 3 & 4.
(c) 3 & 4.
(d) 1, 2, 3 & 4. (2 Marks)
4. Where the National Anti-Profiteering Authority determines that a registered person has not passed on
the benefit of input tax credit to the recipient by way of commensurate reduction in price, the Authority
may order:
i. reduction in prices
ii. imposition of prescribed penalty
iii. cancellation of registration
Which of the above options are correct?
(a) i. and ii.
(b) i., ii. and iii.
(c) i. and iii.
(d) i. (2 Marks)
5. In which of the following cases, compounding of offence is not allowed under section 138 of the CGST
Act, 2017?
(a) a person who has been allowed to compound once in respect of any of the offences specified in
clauses (a) to (f) of section 132(1) of the CGST Act, 2017.
(b) a person who has been convicted for an offence under GST law by a Court.
(c) a person who has been accused of committing an offence under GST law which is also an offence
under any other law for the time being in force.
(d) All the cases covered in (a), (b) and (c) above (1 Mark)
6. Which of the following is correct for destroyed goods under section 23 of the Customs Act, 1962?
(a) It is only applicable in case of total loss of goods even if the same can be recovered.
(b) The importer is not required to pay duty on such goods.
(c) The provisions are also applicable even if goods are destroyed after warehousing.
(d) The importer need not prove the loss to the proper officer. (1 Mark)

7. In which of the following cases, importer can claim pilferage and choose not to pay duty under section
13 of the Customs Act, 1962?
i. Goods pilfered while on high seas;
ii. Goods pilfered before unloading;
iii. Goods pilfered after unloading but before order for home consumption given by proper officer;
iv. Goods cleared for home consumption.
(a) (i) and (ii)
(b) (i) and (iii)
(c) Only (ii)
(d) Only (iii) (1 Mark)
8. In which of the following cases, can an importer claim abatement of duty under section 22 of the Customs
Act, 1962?
i. Goods pilfered during unloading;
ii. Goods damaged by accident (due to negligence of the importer) after unloading but before
examination for assessment by customs authorities;
iii. Goods destroyed by accident while in warehouse(due to negligence of the importer);
iv. Goods damaged by accident (not due to negligence of the importer) after unloading but before
examination for assessment by customs authorities.
(a) Only (iv)
(b) Only (iii)
(c) Both (i) and (iii)
(d) Only (ii) (1 Mark)
9. Electric shaving machine is classifiable under following:
8510: Shavers and hair clippers with self-contained electric motors;
8509: Electro mechanical domestic appliances with self-contained electric motor
As per rules of classification, electric shaving machine should be classifiable under
(a) 8510
(b) 8509
(c) More information is needed;
(d) Can be classified under both (2 Marks)

1. M/s XYZ, a registered supplier, supplies the following goods and services for construction of buildings
and complexes -
- excavators for required period at a per hour rate
- manpower for operation of the excavators at a per day rate
- soil-testing and seismic evaluation at a per sample rate.
The excavators are invariably hired out along with operators. Similarly, excavator operators are supplied
only when the excavator is hired out.
M/s XYZ receives the following services:
- Maintenance services for excavators;
- Health insurance for operators of the excavators;
- Scientific and technical consultancy for soil testing and seismic evaluation.
For a given month, the receipts (exclusive of GST) of M/s XYZ are as follows:
- Hire charges for excavators - Rs. 18,00,000
- Service charges for supply of manpower for operation of the excavator - Rs. 20,000
- Service charges for soil testing and seismic evaluation at three sites - Rs. 2,50,000
The GST paid during the said month on services received by M/s XYZ is as follows:
- Maintenance for excavators - Rs. 1,00,000
- Health insurance for excavator operators - Rs. 11,000
- Scientific and technical consultancy for soil testing and seismic evaluation - Rs. 1,00,000
Compute the net GST payable by M/s XYZ for the given month.
Assume the rates of GST to be as under:
Hiring out of excavators – 12%
Supply of manpower services and soil-testing and seismic evaluation services – 18%
Note: - Opening balance of input tax credit of GST is nil. (14 Marks)
2. (a) PQR Company Ltd., a registered supplier of Bengaluru (Karnataka), is a manufacturer of goods.
The company provides the following information pertaining to GST paid on input supplies during
the month of April, 20XX:
Sl. No. Items GST paid
in (Rs.)
(i) Life Insurance premium paid by the company on the life of factory 1,50,000
employees as per the policy of the company
(ii) Raw materials purchased for which invoice is missing but delivery 38,000
challan is available.
(iii) Raw materials purchased which are used for zero rated outward 50,000
supply.

(iv) Works contractor's service used for repair of factory building which is 30,000
debited in the profit and loss account of company.
(v) Company purchased the capital goods for Rs. 4,00,000 and claimed
depreciation of Rs. 44,800 (@ 10%) on the full amount of Rs. 48,000
4,48,000 under Income Tax Act, 1961.
Other Information:-
(i) In the month of September, 20XX, of previous financial year, PQR Company Ltd. availed input
tax credit of Rs. 2,40,000 on purchase of raw material which was directly sent to job worker's
premises under a challan on 25-09-20XX of the same financial year. The said raw material
has not been received back from the Job worker up to 30-04-20XX of the current financial
year.
(ii) All the above input supplies except (ii) above have been used in the manufacture of taxable
goods.
Compute the amount of net input tax credit available for the month of April, 20XX with necessary
explanations for your conclusion for each item. You may assume that all the other conditions
necessary for availing the eligible input tax credits have been fulfilled. (9 Marks)
(b) A material was imported by air at CIF price of 5,000 US$. Freight paid was 1,500 US$ and
insurance cost was 500 US$. The banker realized the payment from importer at the exchange rate
of Rs. 71 per dollar. Central Board of Indirect taxes and Customs notified the exchange rate as Rs.
70 per US$. Find the value of the material for the purpose of levying customs duty.
(5 Marks)
3. (a) RST Inc., a corn chips manufacturing company based in USA, intends to launch its products in
India. However, the company wishes to know the taste and sensibilities of Indians before launching
its products in India. For this purpose, RST Inc. has approached ABC Consultants, Mumbai,
(Maharashtra) to carry out a survey in India to enable it to make changes, if any, in its products to
suit Indian taste.
The survey is to be solely based on the oral replies of the surveyees; they will not be provided any
sample by RST Inc. to taste. ABC Consultants will be paid in convertible foreign exchange for the
assignment.
With reference to the provisions of GST law, determine the place of supply of the service. Also,
explain whether the said supply will amount to export of service? (5 Marks)
(b) Chiku Traders is a registered supplier of plastic goods. On 10 th April, 20XX, Chiku Traders received
an order from Neelu Traders for supply of a consignment of plastic goods. Chiku Traders gets the
consignment ready by 15 th April, 20XX. The invoice for the consignment was issued the next day,
16th April, 20XX. Neelu Traders collects the consignment from the godown of Chiku Traders on 25 th
April, 20XX and hands over the cheque towards payment on the same date. The said payment is
entered in the books of accounts of Chiku Traders on 26 th April, 20XX and amount is credited in
their bank account on 27 th April, 20XX.
Determine the time of supply of the plastic goods supplied by Chiku Traders to Neelu Traders as
per the provisions of CGST Act, 2017. (4 Marks)
(c) Dream & Desire Industries has challenged the imposition of anti-dumping duty retrospectively from
the date prior to the date of imposition of anti-dumping duty on the grounds that it is
unconstitutional. Explain whether it would succeed in its contention. (5 Marks)

4. (a) Rajesh Dynamics, having its head office in Chennai, Tamil Nadu carries on the following activities
with respective turnovers in a financial year:
Particulars Rs.
Supply of petrol at Chennai, Tamil Nadu 18,00,000
Value of inward supplies on which tax is payable on reverse charge basis 9,00,000
Supply of transformer oil at Chennai, Tamil Nadu 2,00,000
Value of branch transfer from Chennai, Tamil Nadu to Bengaluru, Karnataka
1,50,000
without payment of consideration
Value of taxable supply of goods at Manipur branch 11,50,000
It argues that it does not have taxable turnover crossing threshold limit of Rs.40,00,000 either at
Chennai, Tamil Nadu or Bengaluru, Karnataka or at Manipur branch. It believes that the
determination of aggregate turnover is not required for the purpose of obtaining registration, but is
required for determining composition levy.
Based on the above facts:
(i) Determine the aggregate turnover of Rajesh Dynamics.
(ii) Specify all conditions that fulfil the requirements for registration under CGST Act, 2017 in the
given circumstances. (6 Marks)
(b) Wye Ltd. provides the following details for the month of September 20XX for computation of refund
claim under rule 89(4) of the CGST Rules, 2017. Compute the eligible claim under the said rule
assuming that other conditions are fulfilled.
Particulars Amount(Rs.)
Opening balance of ITC 5,00,000
ITC availed during the period, which includes the claim for refund made of 25,00,000
Rs.5,00,000 eligible under rule 89(4A)/89(4B) of the CGST Rules, 2007
Zero rated supply of goods made during the period without payment of tax 6,00,00,000
under bond/ LUT, which include the supply of Rs. 1,00,00,000 for which
refund claim is made under rule 89(4A)/89(4B) of the CGST Rules, 2017
Supply of goods other than zero rated supply 3,00,00,000
(3 Marks)
(c) M/s. Pure Energy Ltd. is engaged in oil exploration and has imported software containing seismic
data. The importer is entitled to exemption from customs duty subject to the condition that an
“essentiality certificate” granted by the Director General of Hydrocarbons is produced at the time
of importation of the goods. Though the importer applied for the certificate within the statutory time
limit prescribed for the same, the certificate was not made available to the importer within a
reasonable time by the Director General of Hydrocarbons. The customs department rejected the
importer’s claim for exemption.
Examine briefly whether the department’s action is sustainable in law. (5 Marks)
5. (a) Mr. Anant Kumar Gupta self-assessed his tax liability as Rs. 90,000 for the month of April 20XX
but failed to make the payment.

Subsequently the Department initiated penal proceedings against Mr. Anant Kumar Gupta for
recovery of penalty under section 73 of CGST Act, 2017 for failure to pay GST and issued show
cause notice on 10-08-20XX which was received by Mr. Anant Kumar Gupta on 14-08-20XX.
Mr. Anant Kumar Gupta deposited the tax along with interest on 25-08-20XX and informed the
department on the same day.
Department is contending that he is liable to pay a penalty of Rs. 45,000 (i.e. 50% of Rs. 90,000).
Examine the correctness of the stand taken by the Department with reference to the provisions of
the CGST Act, 2017. (5 Marks)
(b) Mr. A had filed an appeal before the Appellate Tribunal against an order of the Appellate Authority
where the issue involved relates to place of supply. The order of Appellate Tribunal is also in favour
of the Department. Mr.A now wants to file an appeal against the decision of the Appellate Authority
as he feels the stand taken by him is correct.
You are required to advise him suitably with regard to filing of an appeal before the appellate forum
higher than the Appellate Tribunal. (4 Marks)
(c) Acme Sales’ imports were being provisionally assessed pending a verification that the department
was carrying out. Upon completion of the verification, the assessments were finalized, and Acme
Sales was asked to pay Rs. 12 lakhs, which it paid. After six months, upon detailed scrutiny of the
verification report and taking legal opinion on it, Acme Sales filed a claim for refund of Rs. 8 lakhs
on the ground that the differential amount should be Rs. 4 lakhs only and that there were factual
errors in the verification report. Is this the correct mode of redressal for Acme Sales? What will be
the likely outcome of the claim? Discuss on the basis of case law, if any. .
(5 Marks)
6. (a) When is an e-way bill required to be generated? (5 Marks)
(b) Explain the difference between Audit by Tax Authorities under section 65 and Special Audit under
section 66 of the CGST Act, 2017. (4 Marks)
(c) Enumerate the various matters in respect of which policies and regulations are framed under FTP.
(5 Marks)

Test Series: May, 2020
MOCK TEST PAPER 1
SUGGESTED ANSWERS
Division A
1 i (a)
ii (a)
iii (a)
iv (a)
v (b)
2 i (a)
ii (a)
iii (a)
iv (b)
v (b)
3 (a)
4 (b)
5 (d)
6 (c)
7 (d)
8 (a)
9 (a)
Division B
1. Computation of net GST payable by M/s XYZ
(Rs.)
Gross GST liability [Refer Working Note 1 below] 2,63,400
Less: Input tax credit [Refer Working Note 2 below] 2,00,000
Working Notes
Particulars Value received Rate of GST GST payable
(Rs.) (Rs.)
Hiring charges for excavators 18,00,000 12% 2,16,000
Service charges for supply of 20,000 12% 2,400
manpower for operation of excavators
[Refer Note 1]
1

Service charges for soil testing and 2,50,000 18% 45,000
seismic evaluation [Refer Note 2]
Gross GST liability 2,63,400
Notes:
(i) Since the excavators are invariably hired out along with operators and excavator operators
are supplied only when the excavator is hired out, it is a case of composite supply under
section 2(30) of the CGST Act, 2017 wherein the principal supply is the hiring out of the
excavator.
As per section 8(a) of the CGST Act, 2017, the composite supply is treated as th e supply of
the principal supply. Therefore, the supply of manpower for operation of the excavators will
also be taxed at the rate applicable for hiring out of the excavator (principal supply), which is
12%.
(ii) Soil testing and seismic evaluation services being independent of the hiring out of excavator
will be taxed at the rate applicable to them, which is 18%.
(2) Computation of input tax credit available for set off
Particulars GST paid ITC available
(Rs.) (Rs.)
Maintenance services for excavators [Refer Note 1] 1,00,000 1,00,000
Health insurance for excavator operators [Refer Note 2] 11,000 -
Scientific and technical consultancy [Refer Note 1] 1,00,000 1,00,000
Total input tax credit available 2,00,000
Notes:
(i) Excavators are special purpose vehicles whose credit is not restricted under section
17(5)(a), therefore, ITC on maintenance service for excavators shall be allowed in terms of
section 17(5)(ab). Further, section 17(5)(d) of the CGST Act, 2017 blocks credit on goods
and/or services received by a taxable person for construction of an immovable property on
his own account. Here, though the excavators are used for building projects, the same are
not used by M/s XYZ on its own account for construction of immovable property; instead
they are used for outward taxable supply of hiring out of machinery.
Therefore, the maintenance service for the excavators does not get covered by the bar
under section 17 of the CGST Act, 2017 and the credit thereon will be available. The same
applies for scientific & technical consultancy for construction projects because in this case
also, the service is used for providing the outward taxable supply of soil testing and seismic
evaluation service and not for construction of immovable property.
(ii) Section 17(5)(b)(i) of the CGST Act, 2017 allows input tax credit on health insurance only
where an inward supply of such services is used by a registered person for making an
outward taxable supply of the same category of goods or services or both or as an element
of a taxable composite or mixed supply or where it is obligatory for an employer to provide
the same to its employees under any law for the time being in force.
In the given case, it is assumed that it is not obligatory for employer to provide health
insurance to its employees under any law for the time being in force, therefore the credit
thereon will not be allowed.

2. (a) Computation of Input Tax Credit (ITC) available with PQR Ltd. for the month of April, 20XX
Particulars Rs.
Life Insurance premium paid by the company on the life of factory employees Nil
[Note 1]
Raw materials purchased [Note 2] Nil
Raw materials used for zero rated outward supply [Note 3] 50,000
Work contractor’s service [Note 4] 30,000
Capital goods purchased wherein the depreciation is claimed on the tax Nil
component [Note 5]
Notes:
(1) ITC on life insurance service is available only when it is obligatory for an employer to
provide said services to its employees under any law for the time being in force. In the
absence of any information, it is assumed that such services are not obligatory for the
employer in the instant case and thus, the ITC thereon is blocked [Proviso to section
17(5)(b) of the CGST Act, 2017].
(2) ITC cannot be taken since invoice is missing and delivery challan is not a valid document to
avail ITC [Section 16 of the CGST Act, 2017]
(3) ITC can be availed for making zero-rated supplies, notwithstanding that such supply may be
an exempt supply – [Section 16 of the IGST Act, 2017]
(4) ITC is blocked on works contract services when supplied for construction of an immovable
property. However, “construction” includes only that repairs which are capitalized along with
the said immovable property. In this case, since repairs of building is debited to P & L
Account, the same does not amount to ‘construction’ and hence ITC thereon is available -
[Section 17(5)(c) of the CGST Act, 2017].
(5) ITC is not available when depreciation has been claimed on the tax compon ent of the cost
of capital goods under the Income-tax Act - [Section 16(3) of the CGST Act, 2017]
(6) The principal is entitled to take ITC of inputs sent for job work even if the said inputs are
directly sent to job worker. However, where said inputs are not received back by the
principal within a period of 1 year of the date of receipt of inputs by the job worker, it shall
be deemed that such inputs had been supplied by the principal to the job worker on the day
when the said inputs were received by the job worker – [Section 19 of the CGST Act, 2017].
Hence, the ITC taken by PQR Company Ltd. in September, 20XX is valid and since 1 year
period has yet not lapsed in April, 20XX, there will be no tax liability on such inputs.
(b) Computation of assessable value
Particulars Amount
CIF value 5000 US $
Less: Freight 1500 US $
Less: Insurance 500 US $
Therefore, FOB value 3000 US $
Assessable value for Customs purpose
FOB value 3000 US $

Add: Freight (20% of FOB value) [Note 1] 600 US $
Add: Insurance (actual) 500 US $
CIF for customs purpose 4100 US $
Exchange rate as per CBIC [Note 2] Rs. 70 per US $
Assessable value (Rs. 70 x 4100 US $) Rs. 2,87,000
Notes:
1. If the goods are imported by air, the freight cannot exceed 20% of FOB price [ Fifth proviso
2. Rate of exchange determined by CBIC is considered [clause (a) of the explanation to
section 14 of the Customs Act, 1962].
3. (a) As per section 13(2) of the IGST Act, 2017, in case where the location of the supplier of services
or the location of the recipient of services is outside India, the place of supply of services except
the services specified in sub-sections (3) to (13) shall be the location of the recipient of services.
Sub-sections (3) to (13) provide the mechanism to determine the place of supply in certain
specific situations.
The given case does not fall under any of such specific situations and thus, the place of supply in
this case will be determined under sub-section (2) of section 13. Thus, the place of supply of
services in this case is the location of recipient of services i.e., USA.
As per section 2(6) of the IGST Act, 2017, export of services means the supply of any service
when,–
(a) the supplier of service is located in India;
(b) the recipient of service is located outside India;
(c) the place of supply of service is outside India;
(d) the payment for such service has been received by the supplier of service in convertible
foreign exchange or in Indian rupees wherever permitted by the Reserve Bank of India; and
(e) the supplier of service and the recipient of service are not merely establishments of a
distinct person in accordance with Explanation 1 in section 8.
Since all the above five conditions are fulfilled in the given case, the same will be considered as
an export of service.
(b) In terms of section 12(2) of the CGST Act, the time of supply of goods is the earlier of the date of
issue of invoice/last date on which the invoice is required to be issued or date of receipt of
payment. However, Notification No. 66/2017 CT dated 15.11.2017 specifies that a registered
person (excluding composition supplier) has to pay GST on the outward supply of goods at the
time of supply as specified in section 12(2)(a) of the CGST Act, 2017, i.e. date of issue of invoice
or the last date on which invoice ought to have been issued in terms of section 31.
As per section 31(1), the invoice in case of supply of goods needs to be issued either before or at
the time of removal/delivery of goods.
In this case, the invoice is issued before the removal of the goods and is thus, within the time
limit prescribed under section 31(1). Therefore, time of supply is the date of issue of invoice,
which is 16th April, 20XX.

(c) Section 9A(3) of the Customs Tariff Act provides that the anti-dumping duty can be imposed with
retrospective effect provided the Government is of the opinion that-
(i) there is a history of dumping which caused injury or that the importer was, or should have
been, aware that the exporter practices dumping and that such dumping would cause injury;
and
(ii) the injury is caused by massive dumping of an article imported in a relatively short time
which in the light of the timing and the volume of the imported article dumped and other
circumstances is likely to seriously undermine the remedial effect of the anti -dumping duty
liable to be levied.
The duty can be levied retrospectively by issuing a notification but not beyond 90 days from
the date of notification.
Thus, Dream & Desire Industries would succeed in its contention if all the above conditions
are not satisfied.
4. (a) Computation of aggregate turnover of Rajesh Dynamics:
Particulars Rs.
Supply of petrol at Chennai, Tamil Nadu [Being a non-taxable supply, it is an 18,00,000
exempt supply and thus, includible in aggregate turnover vide section 2(6) of
CGST Act, 2017]
Value of inward supplies on which tax is payable on reverse charge basis Nil
Value of branch transfer from Chennai, Tamil Nadu to Bengaluru, Karnataka 1,50,000
without payment of consideration [Being a taxable supply, it is includible in
aggregate turnover]
Value of taxable supplies of Manipur Branch 11,50,000
Aggregate turnover 33,00,000
Rajesh Dynamics is not liable to be registered in Chennai, Tamil Nadu, if his aggregate turnover
in a financial year does not exceeds Rs. 40 lakh. However, since Rajesh Dynamics also makes
supplies from Manipur, a specified Special Category State, the threshold exemption gets reduced
to Rs. 10 lakh in terms of section 22(1) of CGST Act, 2017 [Notification No.10/2019-CT dated.
07.03.2019].
Rajesh Dynamics’ argument that it is not liable to registration since the t hreshold exemption of
Rs. 40 lakh is not being crossed either at Chennai, Tamil Nadu, Bengaluru, Karnataka or Manipur
is not correct as firstly, the aggregate turnover to be considered in its case is Rs. 10 lakh and not
Rs. 40 lakh and secondly, the same is computed on all India basis and not State-wise.
Further, Rajesh Dynamics is also wrong in believing that aggregate turnover is computed only for
the purpose of determining the eligibility limit for composition levy since the aggregate turnover is
required for determining the eligibility for both registration and composition levy.
Further, Rajesh Dynamics is compulsorily required to register under section 24 of the CGST Act,
2017 irrespective of the turnover limit as it is liable to pay tax on inward supplies under reverse
charge and it also makes inter-State taxable supply.

(b) As per rule 89(4) of the CGST Rules, 2017, in case of zero-rated supply of goods without
payment of tax under bond/LUT, refund of ITC is granted as per the following formula :
(Turnover of zero-rated supply of goods + Turnover
Refund Amount of zero-rated supply of services) × Net ITC
=
Adjusted Total Turnover
Net ITC excludes ITC availed for which refund is claimed under rule 89(4A)/ (4B) of the CGST
Rules, 2017. Further, turnover of zero-rated supply of goods and adjusted total turnover exclude
turnover of supplies in respect of which refund is claimed under 89 (4A)/ (4B).
Accordingly, turnover of zero rated supply of goods = Rs. 5,00,00,000 [Rs. 6,00,00,000 –
Rs. 1,00,00,000];
Net ITC = Rs. 20,00,000 [Rs. 25,00,000 – Rs. 5,00,000] and
Adjusted Total Turnover = Rs. 8,00,00,000 [Rs. 6,00,00,000 + Rs. 3,00,00,000 –
Rs. 1,00,00,000]
Thus, maximum refund amount under rule 89(4)
= Rs. 20,00,000 × Rs. 5,00,00,000 / Rs. 8,00,00,000 = Rs. 12,50,000.
(c) This issue has been addressed by the Supreme Court in the case of Commissioner of Customs v.
Tullow India Operations Ltd. (2005) 189 ELT 401 (SC). The Apex Court has observed that if a
condition is not within the power and control of the importer and depends upon the acts of public
functionaries, non-compliance of such a condition, subject to just exceptions cannot be held to be
a condition precedent which would disable it from obtaining the benefit for all times to co me.
In the given case also the certificate has not been granted within a reasonable time. Therefore,
in view of the above-mentioned judgement, the importer M/s Pure Energy Ltd. cannot be blamed
for the lapse by the authorities. The Directorate General of Hydrocarbons is under the Ministry of
Petroleum and Natural Gas and such a public functionary is supposed to grant the essentiality
certificate within a reasonable time so as to enable the importer to avail of the benefits under the
notification.
5. (a) Due date for payment of tax for the month of April, 20XX is 20.05.20XX.
As per section 73 of the CGST Act, 2017, where self-assessed tax is not paid within 30 days from
due date of payment of such tax, penalty equivalent to 10% of tax or Rs. 10,000, whichever is
higher, is payable. Thus, option to pay tax within 30 days of issuance of SCN to avoid penalty, is
not available in case of self-assessed tax.
Since in the given case, Mr. Anant Kumar Gupta has not paid the self-assessed tax within 30
days of due date [i.e. 20.05.20XX], penalty equivalent to:
(i) 10% of tax, viz., Rs. 9,000 (10% of Rs. 90,000) or
(ii) Rs. 10,000,
whichever is higher, is payable by him. Thus, penalty payable is Rs. 10,000.
Hence, the stand taken by the Department that penalty will be levied on Mr. Anant Kumar Gupta
is correct, but the amount of penalty Rs. 45,000 is not correct.
(b) As per section 117(1) of the CGST Act, 2017, an appeal against orders passed by the State
Bench or Area Benches of the Tribunal lies to the High Court if the High Court is satisfied that
such an appeal involves a substantial question of law.
However, appeal against orders passed by the National Bench or Regional Benches of the
Tribunal lies to the Supreme Court and not High Court. As per section 109 (5) of the Act, only the

National Bench or Regional Benches of the Tribunal can decide appeals where one of the issues
involved relates to the place of supply.
Since the issue involved in Mr. A’s case relates to place of supply, the appeal in his case wo uld
have been decided by the National Bench or Regional Bench of the Tribunal. Thus, Mr. A will
have to file an appeal with the Supreme Court and not with the High Court.
(c) Acme Sales received an order finalizing provisional assessment on the basis of a verification
report, and requiring payment of Rs. 12 Lakhs. They did not contest this order, but made the
payment, and allowed the appeal period of sixty days to lapse. After appeal became time -barred
they filed a claim for refund in which they challenged the order. This was a backdoor method of
seeking relief against the order; it also asked an officer of the same rank to review the order
passed; and it sought to bypass the time limitation for appeal by presenting the appeal as a claim
for refund. The Supreme Court has held, in the case of Priya Blue Industries Limited, 2004 (172)
ELT 145 (SC), that such a refund claim is not permissible for all these reasons. A person who is
aggrieved with an assessment order cannot seek refund without filing an appeal aga inst the
assessment order.
6. (a) As per rule 138 of the CGST Rules, 2017, whenever there is a movement of goods of
consignment value exceeding Rs. 50,000:
(i) in relation to a supply; or
(ii) for reasons other than supply; or
(iii) due to inward supply from an unregistered person,
e-way bill needs to be generated prior to the commencement of transport of goods.
Further, in the following situations, e-way bill needs to be issued even if the value of the
consignment is less than Rs. 50,000:
(i) Where goods are sent by a principal located in one State/ Union territory to a job worker
located in any other State/Union territory, the e-way bill shall be generated either by the
principal or the job worker, if registered, irrespective of the value of the consig nment.
(ii) Where specified handicraft goods are transported from one State/ Union territory to another
State/ Union territory by a person who has been exempted from the requirement of
obtaining registration under section 24 of the CGST Act, 2017, the e-way bill shall be
generated by the said person irrespective of the value of the consignment.
(b) Audit by Tax authorities under section 65 of the CGST Act, 2017:-
1 The Commissioner or any officer authorized by him can undertake audit of any registered
person for such period, at such frequency and in such manner as may be prescribed.
2 The audit shall be completed within a period of 3 months from the date of commencement of
audit. However, the Commissioner can extend this period by a further period upto maximum
6 months.
Special Audit under section 66 of the CGST Act, 2017:-
1 The registered person can be directed to get his records including books of account
examined and audited by a chartered accountant or a cost accountant during any stage of
scrutiny, inquiry, investigation or any other proceedings; depending upon the complexity of
the case. Any officer not below the rank of Assistant Commissioner may order special audit,
with the prior approval of the Commissioner, if he is of the opinion that the value ha s not
been correctly declared or the credit availed is not within the normal limits.
2 Audit is to be completed within 90 days. However, the Assistant Commissioner can extend
this period by a further period of 90 days.

(c) Following issues are covered under FTP 2015-2020 -
 General provisions regarding import and export of goods – Chapter 2 of FTP 2015-2020.
 Export from India Scheme [MEIS and SEIS] to encourage exports of specified goods to
specified countries and also export of services – Chapter 3 of FTP 2015-2020.
 Duty Exemption and Remission Schemes [Advance Authorisation, DFIA and Duty Drawback
Scheme and duty remissions schemes under GST law] to enable exporters to import inputs
without payment of customs duty – Chapter 4 of FTP 2015-2020.
 Export Promotion Capital Goods (EPCG) scheme [to obtain capital goods without payment
of customs duty] – Chapter 5 of FTP 2015-2020.
 EOU/EHTP/STP and BTP schemes – Chapter 6 of FTP 2015-2020.
 Deemed Exports – Chapter 7 of FTP 2015-2020.
 Quality Complaints and Trade Disputes – Chapter 8 of FTP 2015-2020.
Policy in respect of Special Economic Zones [SEZ] is contained in SEZ Act, 2005 and Rules.

Downloaded from castudyweb.com

MOCK TEST PAPER
Notes:
note.
2020 and (ii) Customs law as amended by the Finance Act, 2019 and notifications/circulars issued till
30th April, 2020.
1. William & Sons (WS) is a registered partnership firm engaged in manufacturing activity in the state of
Rajasthan under GST. In the month of July, following transactions were undertaken by WS:
(a) Intra-state sale of goods worth ` 10,00,000. Out of such sale, ` 5,00,000 worth of goods were
liable to GST at 28% and balance were liable to GST at 18%.
(b) Intra-state purchase of goods worth ` 10,00,000 which is liable to GST at 28%.
(c) WS intended to transfer the business as going concern to Morgan & Sons (MS) on 31 st July. As
per the terms of transfer, WS will transfer all the business assets worth ` 50,00,000 and all the
liabilities valued at ` 60,00,000.
(d) WS, on account of such transfer, paid gift worth ` 50,000 to its 3 employees as a reward towards
their services to the firm.
During the month of September, MS received the notice from the authorities for outstanding liability of
GST for ` 5,00,000 pertaining to the period before transfer of business by WS. Such liability was
determined after the transfer of business. For this purpose, assume that all the assets and liabilities
were transferred by WS to MS.
The balance of input tax credit as on 1 st July for the WS is Nil.
GST is applicable in the aforesaid case scenario at the following rates unless otherwise specified:
CGST - 9%, SGST - 9%, IGST - 18%.
All the amounts given above are exclusive of GST, wherever applicable.

Basis the aforesaid case scenario, please answer the following questions:
(I) The gross GST liability (without set off of input tax credit) of WS fo r the month of July is-
(a) 2,32,000
(b) 2,80,000
(c) 25,000
(d) 2,30,000
(II) In case of transfer of business to MS, what is the amount of input tax credit which shall stand
transferred to MS?
(a) ` 25,000
(b) ` 50,000
(c) Nil. In case of partnership firm input tax credit cannot be transferred on account of transfer
of business.
(d) Nil as the value of liabilities is more than the value of assets.
(III) Suppose there is no transfer of business to MS, what is the amount of input tax credit lying in
input tax credit ledger, if any, which can be claimed as refund by WS for the month of July?
(a) ` 50,000 under inverted duty structure
(b) Nil. Since WS is making outward supply of 28% also, the balance credit shall be carried
forward.
(c) ` 23,000 under inverted duty structure
(d) ` 25,000 under inverted duty structure
(IV) Who is liable to discharge the liability of ` 5,00,000 on account of notice received by MS in the
month of September?
(a) MS as the business is transferred by WS in July and notice was received in September
(b) WS as the notice pertains to liability before transfer of business
(c) Liability on MS only up to the amount of input tax credit transferred by WS
(d) MS and WS jointly and severally liable
(V) Suppose WS transfers the business as a going concern and transfers all the assets and liabilities
of such business for a lumpsum amount to MS, the transaction shall be:
(a) treated as taxable supply liable to GST under forward charge as WS is a registered person
(b) liable to GST in the hands of MS under reverse charge basis
(c) exempted from GST
(d) liable to GST only for assets on which input tax credit is availed (5 x 2 Marks=10 Marks)
2. M/s KLM Ltd is a large publishing and printing house registered in Maharashtra having Single GSTIN,
engaged in supply of books, letter cards, envelopes, guides and reference materials. KLM Ltd. has
front offices in Mumbai & Nagpur for receiving the orders; orders are supplied to front office or
supplied to recipient directly depending on order from the workshop located at Nagpur.

During March, 2020, KLM Ltd. received a proposal for printing of 5,000 copies of Taxation book from a
renowned author where only content will be supplied by the author. KLM Ltd. agreed to supply the
books. As per requirement of the author, 2500 copies were supplied from workshop to Nagpur front
office and 2500 copies to Mumbai front office from where the author collected books.
Satisfied with quality of books, author placed order of 10,000 pieces of letterhead during April, 2020,
the design and logo was supplied by the author for printing. Due to these orders KLM Ltd earned a
handsome amount of profit and decided to gift employees for their performance, accordingly KLM Ltd
gifted android mobile phone worth ` 36,500 each to all its 45 employees.
In relation to the above, answer the following questions:
I. Supply of taxation books by KLM Ltd is:
(a) Composite supply, principal supply being “supply of service”
(b) Composite supply, principal supply being “supply of goods”
(c) Mixed supply
(d) At the choice of the KLM Ltd (I.e. KLM Ltd may treat it as a supply of goods or service or
mixed supply) and pay tax accordingly.
II. Supply of Letterheads by KLM Ltd will be treated as:
(a) Composite supply, principal supply being “supply of service”
(b) Composite supply, principal supply being “supply of goods”
(c) Mixed supply
(d) At the choice of the KLM Ltd (I.e. KLM Ltd may treat it as a supply of goods or supply of
service or mixed supply) and pay tax accordingly.
III. Distribution of mobiles to employees by KLM Ltd will be:
(a) Treated as deemed supply as per Para –2 of Schedule –I, because the aggregate value of
mobile phones is more than Rs 50,000.
(b) Not to be treated as deemed supply as per para 2 of schedule-I, because value of the
mobile phone is less than ` 50,000 per employee.
(c) Treated as deemed supply as per Para –2 of Schedule –I, because the value of mobile
phone is more than Rs 25,000 per employee.
(d) Treated as deemed supply as per Para –2 of Schedule –I, because the value of mobile
phone is more than Rs 35,000 per employee.
IV. In relation to taxability of supplies of copies from workshop to front office:
(a) Transfer from workshop to Nagpur front office will be treated as stock transfer not liable to
GST; however transfer from workshop to the Mumbai front office will be treated as branch
transfer between distinct persons liable to GST.
(b) Transfer from the workshop to Nagpur front office and Mumbai Front office will be treated as
stock transfer between distinct persons liable to GST.
(c) Transfer from the workshop to Nagpur front office and Mumbai Front office will be treated as
stock transfer not liable to GST.

(d) Transfer from workshop to the Mumbai front office will be treated as stock transfer not liable
to GST, however transfer from workshop to the Nagpur front office will be treated as branch
transfer between distinct persons liable to GST. (4 x 2 Marks=8 Marks)
3. Byomkesh Mukherjee & Sons, a registered person located in the state of West Bengal, is engaged in
the supply of taxable goods. He desires to take part in a trade fair to be held in State of Gujarat for
supply of such goods. He does not have fixed place of business in Gujarat. Which of the following
statement(s) is correct in the context of obtaining registration in Gujarat?
(a) He has to obtain registration as regular tax payer under section 22 of the CGST Act
(b) He has to obtain registration as composition tax payer under section 10 of the CGST Act
(c) He has to obtain registration as casual taxable person as defined under section 2(20) of the
CGST Act
(d) He is not required to obtain registration if his aggregate turnover does not exceed ` 40 lakh.
(2 Marks)
4. A person purchases new battery in exchange of old battery and balance payment of ` 3500 in money.
The price of the new battery without exchange is ` 15,000. Which one is correct regarding GST
liability on the transaction?
(a) GST is payable on ` 3500 + open market value of old battery.
(b) GST is payable on ` 3500
(c) GST is payable on open market value of new battery, i.e. ` 15,000
(d) GST is payable on value of battery of like kind or quality (2 Marks)
5. Countervailing duty under section 9 of the Customs Tariff Act shall not be levied unless it is
determined that:
(i) Subsidy relates to export performance;
(ii) Subsidy relates to use of domestic goods over imported goods in export article;
(iii) Subsidy is conferred on all persons engaged in the manufacture of export article.
(a) All of above
(b) Only (iii)
(c) (ii) and (iii)
(d) (i) and (ii) (2 Marks)
(a) Higher of margin of dumping or injury margin
(b) Lower of margin of dumping or injury margin
(c) Higher of export price or normal value
(d) Lower of export price or normal value (2 Marks)
7. Which of the following is not considered as a supply under the CGST Act, 2017?
(a) Importation of architectural services for `1,00,000/- for construction of residential property used
for personal purposes from unrelated person.

(b) Importation of architectural services free of cost for construction of office used for business
purposes from related person.
(c) Importation of architectural services free of cost for construction of office used for business
purposes from unrelated person.
(d) Both (a) and (c) (2 Marks)
8. If a taxable person has done the following act, inspection can be ordered:
(i) Suppression of any transaction of supply of goods or services
(ii) Suppression of stock of goods in hand
(iii) Contravention of any provision of the GST law to evade tax
(a) (i) and (ii)
(b) (ii) and (iii)
(c) (i) and (iii)
(d) (i), (ii) and (iii) (1 Mark)
9. The taxable event under the Customs Act, 1962 is:
(a) Import of goods into India/ export of goods from India;
(b) Supply of goods into India/ Supply of goods from India to outside India;
(c) Sale of goods into India/ Sale of goods outside India;
(d) Manufacture of goods into India for supply outside India. (1 Mark)

1. ABC Company Ltd. of Bengaluru is a manufacturer and registered supplier of machine. It has provided
the following details for the month of November, 2019.
Details of GST paid on inward supplies during the month:
Items GST paid
(`)
Health insurance of factory employees as required by Factory Act 20,000
Raw materials for which invoice has been received and GST has also been paid for 18,000
full amount but only 50% of material has been received, remaining 50% will be
received in next month.
Work contractor’s service used for installation of plant and machinery. 12,000
Purchase of manufacturing machine directly sent to job worker’s premises under 50,000
challan.
Purchase of car used by director for the business meetings only. 25,000
Outdoor catering service availed for business meetings. 8,000
ABC Company Ltd. also provides service of hiring of machines along with man power for operation. As
per trade practice machines are always hired out along with operators and also operators are supplied
only when machines are hired out.
Receipts on outward supply (exclusive of GST) for the month of November, 2019 are as follows:
5

Items Outward Supply (`)

Hiring receipts for machine 5,25,000
Service charges for supply of man power operators 2,35,000
Assume all the transactions are inter State and the rates of IGST to be as under:
(i) Service of hiring of machine 12%
(ii) Supply of man power operator service 18%
Compute the amount of input tax credit available and also the net GST payable for the month of
November, 2019 by giving necessary explanations for treatment of various items.
Note: Opening balance of input tax credit is Nil. (14 Marks)
2. (a) Mr. Nagarjun, a registered supplier of Chennai, has received the following amounts in respect of
the activities undertaken by him during the month ended on 30 th September, 2019:
S. No. Particulars Amount (`)
(i) Amount charged for service provided to recognized sports body as 50,000
selector of national team.
(ii) Commission received as an insurance agent from insurance 65,000
company.
(iii) Amount charged as business correspondent for the services 15,000
provided to the urban branch of a nationalized bank with respect to
savings bank accounts.
(iv) Service to foreign diplomatic mission located in India. 28,000
(v) Funeral services. 30,000
He received the services from unregistered goods transport agency for his business activities and
paid freight of ` 45,000 (his aggregate turnover of previous year was ` 9,90,000).
Note: All the transactions stated above are intra-State transactions and also are exclusive of
GST.
You are required to calculate gross value of taxable supply on which GST is to be paid by
Mr. Nagarjun for the month of Septembe, 2019. Working notes should form part of your answer.
(9 Marks)
(b) Compute the total duty and integrated tax payable under the Customs Law on an imported
equipment based on the following information:
(i) Assessable value of the imported equipment US $ 10,100
(ii) Date of bill of entry is 25.4.2019. Basic customs duty on this date is 10% and exchange
rate notified by the Central Board of Indirect taxes and Customs is US $ 1 = ` 72.
(iii) Date of entry inwards is 21.4.2019. Basic customs duty on this date is 20% and exchange
rate notified by the Central Board of Indirect taxes and Customs is US $ 1 = ` 70.
(iv) Integrated tax: 12%
(v) Social Welfare surcharge 10%
Make suitable assumptions where required and show the relevant workings and round off y our
answer to the nearest rupee.
Note: Ignore GST Compensation Cess. (5 Marks)
6

3. (a) Raman Row, a registered supplier under GST in Mumbai, Maharashtra is directed by Nero
Enterprises, Kolkata, West Bengal to deliver goods valued at ` 12,00,000 to Fabricana of
Aurangabad in Maharashtra. Raman Row makes out an invoice at 9% tax rate under CGST and
SGST respectively (scheduled rate) and delivers it locally in Maharashtra.
Discuss and comment on the above levy of tax and determine the tax liability of goods in the
above circumstances. (5 Marks)
(b) Determine taxable value of supply under the GST law with respect to each of the following
independent services provided by the registered persons:
(1) Fees charged from office staff for in-house personality development course conducted by
M.V. College - ` 10,000. M. V. College provides education as a part of a curriculum for
obtaining a qualification recognised by a law
(2) Bus fees collected from students by M.V. College - ` 2,500 per month.
(3) Housekeeping service provided by M/s. Clean well to Himavarsha Montessori school in its
premises, a play school - ` 25,000 per month.
(4) Info link supplied ''Tracing Alphabets", an online educational journal, to students of UKG
class of Sydney Montessori School - ` 2,000. (4 Marks)
(c) Determine the customs duty payable under the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 including the safeguard
duty of 30% under section 8B of the said Act with the following details available on hand:
Assessable value of Sodium Nitrite imported from a developing country from ` 30,00,000
26th February, 2019 to 25th February, 20209 (both days inclusive)
Share of imports of Sodium Nitrite from the developing country against total 4%
imports of Sodium Nitrite to India
Basic custom duty 10%
Integrated tax 12%
Social welfare surcharge 10%
Note: Ignore GST compensation cess. (5 Marks)

4. (a) Pari & Sons is an unregistered dealer. On 10 th August, 2019 aggregate turnover of Pari & Sons
exceeded ` 20,00,000. The firm applied for registration on 27 th August, 2019 and was granted
the registration certificate on 1 st September, 2019.
Under CGST Rules, 2017, you are required to advise Pari & Sons as to what is the effective date
of registration in its case. It has also sought your advice regarding period for issuance of revised
tax invoices. (5 Marks)
(b) Bedi Manufacturers, a registered person, instructs its supplier to send the capital go ods directly
to Rajesh Enterprises, who is a job worker, outside its factory premises for carrying out certain
operations on the goods. The goods were sent by the supplier on 10-04-2019 and were received
by the job worker on 15-04-2019. Rajesh Enterprises carried out the job work, but did not return
the capital goods to their principal - Bedi Manufacturers. Discuss whether Bedi Manufacturers are
eligible to retain the input tax credit availed by them on the capital goods. What action un der the
GST is required to be taken by Bedi Manufacturers.
What would be your answer if in place of capital goods, jigs and fixtures are supplied to the job
worker and the same has not been returned to the principal? (4 Marks)

product. An exemption notification was in force providing exemption in respect of specified r aw
(5 Marks)
5. (a) On 05.07.2019, a show cause notice for ` 5,00,000 was issued to Mr. Vijay Kumar Sharma
demanding short payment of GST of ` 4,50,000 for the month of January, 2019 and also interest
of ` 50,000.
Mr. Sharma raised objections and after personal hearing on 30.08.2019, adjudicating authority
passed the final order for ` 3,50,000 for GST, without any reference with regard to payment of
interest.
Mr. Sharma deposited the tax of ` 3,50,000 on 02.09.2019 and informed the department on the
same day. Subsequently, on 15.09.2019, department demanded payment of interest of ` 60,000
on GST of ` 3,50,000.
Mr. Vijay Kumar Sharma is not ready to pay any interest. His contention is that he is not liable for
interest because he deposited all the amount specified in the final adjudication order.
Examine with a brief note the validity of the action taken by the Department with reference to
provisions of the CGST Act, 2017. (5 Marks)
(b) Shagun started supply of services in Vasai, Maharashtra from 01.01.2020. Her turnover
exceeded ` 20 lakh on 25.01.2020. However, she didn’t apply for registration. Determine the
amount of penalty, if any, that may be imposed on Shagun on 31.03.20 20, if the tax evaded by
her, as on said date, on account of failure to obtain registration is ` 1,26,000. (4 Marks)
(c) Mr. N has, over three consignments of 200, 400 and 400 units, imported a total of 1,000 units of
an article "ZEP", which has been valued at ` 1,150 per unit. The customs duty on this article has
been assessed ` 250 per unit. He adds his profit margin ` 350 per unit and sells the article for
` 1,750 per unit.
After one month of selling the entire consignment of article "ZEP", Mr. N found that there had
been an error in payment of amount of duty, in which duty for the consignment of 200 units was
paid as if it was 400 units, resulting in excess payment of duty. Mr. N files an application for
refund for ` 50,000 (200 X 250). Is the bar of unjust enrichment attracted? (5 Marks)
6. (a) With reference to section 54(3) of the CGST Act, 2017, mention the cases where refund of
unutilised input tax credit is allowed. (5 Marks)
(b) Explain the safeguards provided under section 69 of CGST Act, 2017, to a person who is placed
under arrest? (4 Marks)
(c) What are the salient features of Duty-Free Import Authorization Scheme (DFIA)? Which duties
are exempted under this scheme? (5 Marks)


MOCK TEST PAPER
SUGGESTED ANSWERS
Division A
1 I (d)
II (b)
III (a)
IV (d)
V (c)
2 I (a)
II (b)
III (b)
IV (c)
3 (c)
4 (c)
5 (d)
6 (b)
7 (c)
8 (d)
9 (a)
Division B
1. Computation of net GST payable by ABC Company Ltd.
(`)
Gross GST liability [Refer working note (2) below] 91,200
Less: Input tax credit [Refer working note (1) below] 82,000
Working Notes:
(1) Computation of Input Tax Credit (ITC) available with ABC Company Ltd. in the month of
November, 2019
Particulars GST (`)
Health insurance of factory employees [Note – 1] 20,000
Raw material received in factory [Note – 2] Nil
Work’s contractor’s service used for installation of plant and machinery [Note -3] 12,000
Manufacturing machinery directly sent to job worker’s premises under challan 50,000
[Note -4]
1

Purchase of car used by director for business meetings only [Note -5] Nil
Outdoor catering service availed for business meetings [Note -6] Nil
Notes:
1. ITC of health insurance is available in the given case in terms of proviso to section 17(5)(b)
of the CGST Act, 2017 since it is obligatory for employer to provide health insurance to its
employees under Factory Act -.
2. Where the goods against an invoice are received in lots/ installments, ITC is allowed upon
receipt of the last lot/ installment vide first proviso to section 16(2) of the CGST Act, 201 7.
Therefore, ABC Company Ltd. will be entitled to ITC of raw materials on receipt of second
installment in December, 2019.
3. Section 17(5)(c) of CGST Act, 2017 provides that ITC on works contract services is blocked
when supplied for construction of immovable property (other than plant and machinery)
except when the same is used for further supply of works contract service.
Though in this case, the works contract service is not used for supply of works contract
service, ITC thereon will be allowed since such services are being used for installation of
plant and machinery.
4. ITC on capital goods directly sent to job worker’s premises under challan is allowed in terms
of section 19(5) of CGST Act, 2017 read with rule 45(1) of CGST Rules, 2017.
5. Section 17(5)(a) of CGST Act, 2017 provides that motor vehicle for transportation of
persons having approved seating capacity of not more than 13 persons (including the
driver), except when they are used for making taxable supply of-
(i) further supply of such vehicles,
(ii) transportation of passengers,
(iii) imparting training on driving, flying, navigating such vehicles and
Since ABC Company Ltd is a supplier of machine and it does not use the car for
transportation of goods or any other use as specified, ITC thereon will not be available.
6. Section 17(5)(b)(i) of CGST Act, 2017 provides that ITC on outdoor catering is blocked
except where the same is used for making further supply of outdoor catering or as an
element of a taxable composite or mixed supply.
Since ABC Company Ltd is a supplier of machine, ITC thereon will not be available.
Value received Rate of GST GST payable
(`) (`)
Hiring receipts for machine 5,25,000 12% 63,000
Service charges for supply of
manpower operators 2,35,000 12% 28,200
Gross GST liability 91,200
Note:
Since machine is always hired out along with operators and operators are supplied only when the
machines are hired out, it is a case of composite supply, wherein the principal s upply is the hiring
out of machines [Section 2(30) of the CGST Act, 2017 read with section 2(90) of that Act].
Therefore, service of supply of manpower operators will also be taxed at the rate applicable for
2

hiring out of machines (principal supply), which is 12%, in terms of section 8(a) of the CGST Act,
2017.
2. (a) Computation of gross value of taxable supply on which GST is to be paid by Mr. Nagarjun
Particulars Amount
(`)
Supplies on which Mr. Nagarjun is liable to pay GST under forward
charge
Amount charged for service provided to recognized sports body as selector of 50,000
national team [Note 1]
Commission received as an insurance agent from insurance company [Note 2] Nil
Amount charged as business correspondent for the services provided to the 15,000
urban branch of a nationalised bank with respect to savings bank accounts
[Note 3]
Services provided to foreign diplomatic mission located in India [Note 4] 28,000
Funeral services [Note 5] Nil
Supplies on which Mr. Nagarjun is liable to pay GST under reverse
charge
Services received from GTA [Note 6] 45,000
Value of taxable supply on which GST is to be paid 1,38,000
Notes:
(1) Services provided to a recognized sports body by an individual only as a player, referee,
umpire, coach or team manager for participation in a sporting event organized by a
recognized sports body are exempt from GST vide Exemption Notification No. 12/2017
CT(R) dated 28.06.2017. Thus, service provided as selector of team is liable to GST.
(2) Though commission for providing insurance agent’s services is liable to GST, the tax
payable thereon is to be paid by the recipient of service i.e., insurance company, under
reverse charge in terms of Notification No. 13/2017 CT(R) dated 28.06.2017. Thus,
Mr. Nagarjun will not be liable to pay GST on such commission.
(3) Services provided by business correspondent to a banking company with respect to
accounts in its rural area branch are exempt from GST vide Exemption Notification No.
12/2017 CT(R) dated 28.06.2017. Thus, such services provided in respect of urban area
branch will be taxable.
(4) While services provided by a foreign diplomatic mission located in India are exempt from
GST vide Exemption Notification No. 12/2017 CT(R) dated 28.06.2017, services provided to
such mission are taxable.
(5) Funeral services being covered in entry 4 of Schedule III to CGST Act, 2017 are not a
supply and thus, are outside the ambit of GST.
(6) GST on services provided by a GTAto inter alia a registered person is payable by the
recipient of service i.e., the registered person, under reverse charge in terms of Notification
No. 13/2017 CT(R) dated 28.06.2017. The turnover of previous year is irrelevant in this
case.

(b) Computation of total customs duty and integrated tax payable

Particulars `
Assessable value ($ 10,100 x 72) [Note-1] 7,27,200.00
Add: Basic custom duty @ 10% [Note-2] 72,720.00
Add: Social Welfare Surcharge @ 10% on ` 72,720 7,272.00
Total 8,07,192.00
Add: Integrated tax @ 12% [Note-3] 96,863.04
Total Customs duty and integrated tax payable (rounded off to 1,76,855
nearest rupee)
Notes:
1. Rate of exchange notified by CBIC as prevalent on the date of filing of bill of entry would be
the applicable rate [Proviso to section 14(1) of Customs Act, 1962].
2. Rate of duty would be the rate as prevalent on the date of filing of bill of entry or entry
inwards whichever is later. [Proviso to section 15 of the Customs Act, 1962].
3. Integrated tax is levied on the sum total of the assessable value of the imported goods,
customs duties and applicable social welfare surcharge.
3. (a) The supply between Raman Row (Mumbai, Maharashtra) and Nero Enterprises (Kolkata, West
Bengal) is a bill to ship to supply where the goods are delivered by the supplier [Raman Row] to
a recipient [Fabricana (Aurangabad, Maharashtra)] or any other person on the direction of a third
person [Nero Enterprises]. In such a case, it is deemed that the said third person has recei ved
the goods and the place of supply of such goods is the principal place of business of such person
[Section 10(1)(b) of IGST Act, 2017].
Accordingly, the place of supply between Raman Row (Mumbai, Maharashtra) and Nero
Enterprises (Kolkata, West Bengal) will be Kolkata and thus, it will be an inter-State supply liable
to IGST. Hence, Raman Row should charge 18% IGST on ` 12,00,000, which comes out to
` 2,16,000.
This situation involves another supply between Nero Enterprises (Kolkata, West Bengal) and
Fabricana (Aurangabad, Maharashtra). The place of supply in this case will be the location of the
goods at the time when the movement of goods terminates for delivery to the recipient i.e.,
Aurangabad, Maharashtra in terms of section 10(1)(a) of IGST Act, 2017. Thus, being an inter-
State supply, the same will also be chargeable to IGST.
(b) (1) As per Notification No. 12/2017 CT (R) dated 28.06.2017, services provided by an
educational institution to its students, faculty and staff are exempt from GS T. Educational
Institution has been defined to mean, inter alia, an institution providing services by way of
education as a part of a curriculum for obtaining a qualification recognised by any law for
the time being in force.
Since M. V. College provides education as a part of a curriculum for obtaining a qualification
recognised by a law, the services provided by it to its staff by way of conducting personality
development course would be exempt from GST.
(2) Since M. V. College provides education as a part of a curriculum for obtaining a qualification
recognised by a law, the transport services provided by it to its students would be exempt
from GST.
educational institution, by way of, inter alia, house-keeping services performed in such
educational institution are exempt from GST. However, such an exemption is available only
4

when the said services are provided to a pre-school education and a higher secondary
school or equivalent.
Therefore, house-keeping services provided to Himavarsha Montessori Play School would
be exempt from GST as housekeeping services have been performed in such play school
itself.
educational institution by way of supply of online educational journals or periodicals is
exempt from GST. However, such an exemption is available only when the said services are
provided to an educational institution providing education as a part of a curriculum for
obtaining a qualification recognised by any law for the time being in force.
Therefore, supply of online journal to students of UKG class of Sydney Montessori School
will not be exempt from GST. Hence, the taxable value in this cas e will be ` 2,000.
(c) Computation of customs duty and integrated tax payable thereon
Particular Amount (`)
Assessable value of sodium nitrite imported 30,00,000
Add: Basic custom duty @ 10% (` 30,00,000 × 10%) 3,00,000
Safeguard duty @ 30% on ` 30,00,000 [Safeguard duty is imposable in the
given case since share of imports of sodium nitrite from the developing country
is more than 3% of the total imports of sodium nitrite into India (Proviso to
section 8B(1) of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975)] 9,00,000
Social welfare surcharge @ 10% x ` 3,00,000 30,000
Total 42,30,000
Integrated tax (` 42,30,000 × 12%) [Note] 5,07,600
(` 3,00,000 + ` 9,00,000+ ` 30,000+ ` 5,07,600)
Note: It has been clarified by DGFT vide Guidance note that value for calculation of integrated
tax shall also include safeguard duty amount.
4. (a) Section 22(1) of the CGST Act, 2017 provides that every supplier is liable to be regis tered under
this Act in the State or Union territory, other than special category States, from where he makes a
taxable supply of goods or services or both, if his aggregate turnover in a financial year exceeds
the threshold limit.
Section 25(1) of the CGST Act, 2017 provides that a supplier whose aggregate turnover in a
financial year exceeds the threshold limit in a State/UT is liable to apply for registration within 30
days from the date of becoming liable to registration (i.e., the date of crossing the threshold limit).
Where the application is submitted within the said period, the effective date of registration is the
date on which the person becomes liable to registration vide rule 10(2) of the CGST Rules, 2017;
otherwise it is the date of grant of registration in terms of rule 10(3) of the CGST Rules, 2017.
In the given case, since Pari & Sons have applied for registration on 27 .08.2019 which is within
30 days from the date of becoming liable to registration (10.08.20 19), its effective date of
registration is 10.08.2019.
Further, every registered person who has been granted registration with effect from a date earlier
than the date of issuance of registration certificate to him, may issue revised tax invoices in
respect of taxable supplies effected during this period within one month from the date of issuance

of registration certificate [Section 31(3)(a) of the CGST Act, 2017 read with rule 53(2) of CGST
Rules, 2017].
In view of the same, Pari & Sons may issue revised tax invoices against the invoices already
issued during the period between effective date of registration (10.08.2019) and the date of
issuance of registration certificate (01.09.2019), on or before 01.10.2019.
(b) As per section 19(5) of the CGST Act, 2017, the principal is entitled to take input tax credit of
capital goods sent for job work even if the said goods are directly sent to job worker.
Further, section 19(6) of the CGST Act, 2017 stipulates that where the capital goods sent directly
to a job worker are not received back by the principal within a period of 3 years of the date of
receipt of capital goods by the job worker, it shall be deemed that such cap ital goods had been
supplied by the principal to the job worker on the day when the said capital goods were received
by the job worker.
In view of aforementioned provisions, Bedi Manufacturers are eligible to retain the input tax credit
availed by them on the capital goods.
However, if the capital goods are not returned by Rajesh Enterprises within 3 years from
15.04.2019 (date of receipt of capital goods by job worker), it shall be deemed that such capital
goods had been supplied by Bedi Manufacturers to Rajesh Enterprises on 15.04.2019 and Bedi
Manufacturers shall be liable to pay the tax along with applicable interest.
However, there is no time limit for return of moulds and dies, jigs and fixtures or tools sent out to
a job worker for job work [Section 19(7) of the CGST Act, 2017.
However, if Rajesh Enterprises does not return the jigs and fixtures to Bedi Manufact urers, it
shall not be considered as a supply of jigs and fixtures to Rajesh Enterprises by Bedi
Manufacturers. In this case also, Bedi Manufacturers will be eligible to retain the input tax credit
availed by them.
cannot be denied in respect of goods which are intended for use for manufacture of the final
leakage and loss on account of damage. The benefit of said exemption cannot be denied as
5. (a) As per section 75 of the CGST Act, 2017, the interest on the tax short paid has to be paid
whether or not the same is specified in the order determining the tax liability.
Thus, in view of the same, Mr. Vijay Kumar Sharma will have to pay the interest even though the
same is not specified in the final adjudication order. His contention that he is not liable for interest
because he deposited all the amount specified in the final adjudication order is not valid in law.
However, the amount of interest demanded in the order cannot be in excess of the amount
specified in the notice.
Therefore, in the given case, Department cannot demand the interest in excess of the amount
specified in the notice, which will be ` 50,000.

(b) Where the aggregate turnover of a supplier making supply of services from a State/UT exceeds
`20 lakh in a financial year, he is liable to be registered in the said State/UT. The said supplier
must apply for registration within 30 days from the date on which he becomes liable to
registration. However, in the given case, although Shagun became liable to registration on
25.01.2020, she didn’t apply for registration within 30 days of becoming liable to registration.
Section 122(1)(xi) of the CGST Act, 2017 stipulates that a taxable person who is liable to be
registered under the CGST Act, 2017 but fails to obtain registration shall be liable to pay a
penalty of:
(a) ` 10,000
or
(b) an amount equivalent to the tax evaded [` 1,26,000 in the given case],
whichever is higher.
Thus, the amount of penalty that can be imposed on Shagun is ` 1,26,000.
(c) Mr. N’s invoices show that he collected duty of ` 250 per unit on 1,000 items. However, he paid
duty on 200 items more. This payment, in the normal course, was made before the order
permitting the clearance of the goods. It would be evident from the bill of entry that the amount
paid was more than the amount of duty assessed. Thus, Mr N’s case falls within the exception to
unjust enrichment listed at clause (g) of the first proviso to section 27(2). He will be able to refute
the charge of unjust enrichment. Furthermore, clause (a) of the same sub-section provides that
the doctrine of unjust enrichment will not apply to the refund of duty and interest, if any, paid on
such duty if such amount is relatable to the duty and interest paid by the importer/exporter, if he
had not passed on the incidence of such duty and interest to any other person. Mr. N’s invoices
will show how much duty he collected from his customers, hence he may be covered by this
clause also to escape the bar of unjust enrichment.
6. (a) As per section 54(3) of the CGST Act, 2017, a registered person may claim refund of unutilised
input tax credit at the end of any tax period in the following cases:
(i) Zero rated supplies made without payment of tax: Supply of goods or services or both to
an SEZ developer/unit or export of goods or services or both qualifies as zero rated
supplies. However, refund of unutilized input tax credit shall not be allowed if:
 the goods exported out of India are subjected to export duty;
 the supplier of goods or services or both avails of drawback in respect of CGST or
claims refund of the IGST paid on such supplies.
(ii) Accumulated ITC on account of inverted duty structure: Where the credit has
accumulated on account of rate of tax on inputs being higher than the rate of tax on output
supplies (other than nil rated or fully exempt supplies), except supplies of goods or services
or both as may be notified by the Government on the recommendations of the Council.
(b) Section 69 of CGST Act, 2017 provides following safeguards to a person who is placed under
arrest:
(a) If a person is arrested for a cognizable offence, he must be informed of the grounds of
arrest and be produced before a magistrate within 24 hours.
(b) If a person is arrested for a non-cognizable offence, he shall be admitted to bail or in default
of bail, forwarded to the custody of the Magistrate.
(c) All arrest must be in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure
relating to arrest in terms of section 69(3) of CGST Act, 2017.

(c) DFIA is issued to allow duty free import of inputs, oil and catalyst which are required for
production of export product. The goods imported are exempt ONLY from basic customs duty.
DFIA shall be issued on post export basis for products for which SION have been notified.
Separate DFIA shall be issued for each SION and each port.
No DFIA shall be issued for an export product where SION prescribes ‘Actual User’ condition for
any input.
Holder of DFIA has an option to procure the materials/ inputs from indigenous manufacturer/STE
in lieu of direct import against Advance Release Order (ARO)/ Invalidation letter/ Back to Back
Inland Letter of Credit. However, DFIA holder may obtain supplies from
EOU/EHTP/BTP/STP/SEZ units, without obtaining ARO or Invalidation letter.
Drawback as per rate determined and fixed by Customs authority shall be available for duty paid
inputs, whether imported or indigenous, used in the export product.
DFIA or the inputs imported against it can be transferred after the fulfillment of the export
obligation. A minimum 20% value addition is required for issuance of DFIA except for items in
gems and jewellery sector.

MOCK TEST PAPER 1
Notes:
note.
(iii) All questions should be answered on the basis of position of (i) GST law as amended up to 31st
October, 2020 and (ii) Customs law as amended by the Finance Act, 2020 and notifications/circulars
issued till 31st October, 2020.
1. Ganesh Flour Mill Pvt Ltd., a registered supplier under GST having plant at Howrah, West Bengal, is
engaged in the business of food processing. Within the plant premises, there is a stock yard, an office
and a few residential quarters for employees of the company. After purchasing wheat from local
market/ mandi, the company processes it and packs and sells the finished products such as atta,
maida and suji in 1 Kg, 5 Kg & 10 Kg bags under the brand name “Ganesh Bhog”. The aggregate
turnover of the company during the preceding financial year was Rs. 7.50 crores.
Following details are provided by the company for the month of September:
Particulars Amount
(Rs.)
Sale of “Ganesh Bhog” atta, maida & suji 60,00,000
Purchase of wheat from mandi 14,00,000
Transportation charges paid to an unregistered goods transport operator for 40,000
transportation of wheat from mandi to factory
Hiring charges paid to a local truck owner (not a GTA) for transportation of finished 50,000
products from factory to distributors
Rent received from quarters allotted to employees 10,000
Electricity charges paid to West Bengal State Electricity Board 1,60,000
Bill raised by M/s BIS Security, Kolkata (a partnership firm registered under GST) 1,18,000*
for providing security service

Interest on delayed payment collected from customers 3,500
Interest on fixed deposit in a bank 8,600
Payment to Indian Chamber of Commerce (registered under GST) towards 25,000
sponsorship for Investor Summit at Kolkata
Legal fee paid to advocate, Mr. Ashok Ganguly 30,000
Licence fee paid to Food & Safety Standard Authority of India (FSSAI) 25,000
Following additional information has also been provided by the company:

(1) The security service bill raised by M/s BIS Security* is inclusive of GST @ 18%.
(2) Out of the total sales, “Ganesh Bhog” Atta worth Rs. 3,50,000 (10,000 Kg) was supplied to
Department of School Education, Govt. of West Bengal for further supply to affected families
during Covid-19. A subsidy of Rs.10/kg was received from Govt. of West Bengal for the said
supply.
(3) The company had given a contract to Starcon infra Pvt Ltd. for construction of a drying yard
within the factory premises for Rs. 40 lakh in the month of April, with a completion schedule of 3
months. However, the contractor could not complete the work within the scheduled time.
Therefore, a penalty @ 1% of contract value was recovered from the contractor during
September.
(4) The company had awarded a maintenance contract to Power Electromech Pvt Ltd., Delhi o n 10th
June, for repair of DG set installed in the factory, for Rs. 60,000 with a completion period of 30
days. The maintenance work was completed on 08 th July. However, due to some dispute
regarding quality of work, invoice was issued by Power Electromech Pvt Ltd. only on 5 th
September and payment was released on 15 th September.
(5) The company had delayed in making payment of GST amounting to Rs. 5,000 pertaining to the
month of April by 4 months. The proper officer has imposed a penalty for failure to pay GST
within the prescribed time limit.
(6) The company had deposited the tax liability for the month of August amounting to Rs.3,30,730 on
28th September.
Note. All the above amounts are exclusive of GST, wherever applicable, unless specified otherwis e.
Based on the facts of the case scenario given above, choose the most appropriate answer to the
following questions:
(I) The value of taxable outward supply made by the company in the month of September is -
(a) Rs.61,48,100
(b) Rs.59,43,500
(c) Rs.61,39,500
(d) Rs.59,35,500
(II) The value of taxable supply received by the company in the month of September on which GST
is payable under reverse charge is-
(a) Rs.1,55,000
(b) Rs.1,73,000
(c) Rs.1,30,000

(d) Rs.2,45,000
(III) What is the time of supply of services provided by Power Electromech Pvt Ltd?
(a) 10th June
(b) 5th September
(c) 15th September
(d) 8th July
(IV) The amount of interest payable by the company under section 50 of the CGST Act, 2017 for
delay in payment of tax for the month of August?
(a) Rs.4961
(b) Rs.1305
(c) Rs.4567
(d) Rs.1142
(V) In the context of the imposition of penalty on the company by the proper officer for failure to pay
GST of Rs.5,000, which of the following statements is correct?
(a) Penalty is leviable since the offence is not a “minor breach”.
(b) Penalty is not leviable since the offence is a “minor breach”.
(c) Penalty is leviable on failure to pay tax even if the offence is a minor breach.
(d) No penalty is leviable for delay in payment of tax; only interest is payable for delay in
payment of tax. (5 x 2 Marks each =10 Marks)
2. Mr. Dinanath of Kolkata, a registered person under GST deals in sales & services of electronic goods
such as TV, refrigerator, washing machine etc. His aggregate turnover during the preceding financial
year was Rs. 6.2 crores. He furnishes following information for the month of December.
Outward supplies during the month of December are as under:
Supply of goods to un-registered persons residing in & around Kolkata Rs. 12 lakh
Supply of goods to a dealer of Bihar Rs. 6 lakh
Supply of goods to registered dealers in West Bengal Rs. 28 lakh
Repair & maintenance services provided to un-registered persons Rs. 4 lakh
Inward supplies during the month of December are as under:
Purchase of goods from registered dealers (Inter-State supply) Rs. 30 lakh
Purchase of goods from registered dealers (Intra-State supply) Rs. 4 lakh
Purchase of goods from un-registered dealers (Intra-State supply) Rs. 2 lakh
Transportation charges paid to Om Logistics (GTA) (GST not charged by Rs. 2 lakh
transporter on said bill)
Payment made to Star Security Services Pvt Ltd (not registered under GST) for Rs. 0.50 lakh
providing security services
Loading & un-loading charges paid to labourer Rs. 0.10 lakh
Shop rent paid to Kolkata Municipal Corporation Rs. 0.30 lakh
Fee paid to Mr. Das, a Senior Advocate of Kolkata High court for legal service Rs. 0.10 lakh
3

Following additional information is also provided:
(a) During the course of un-loading TV sets, supplied by a registered person, one LED TV costing
Rs. 25,000 was damaged & the supplier refused to replace the same.
(b) The Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Tax, Kolkata has issued a show cause notice (SCN),
to Mr. Dinanath due to non displaying of Registration Certificate & GSTIN at a prominent place of
principal place of business. Mr Dinanath’s plea is that the display GSTIN to general public is not
mandatory as it is required for buyers only & the same is already mentioned in the tax i nvoice.
(c) GST rate on all inward and outward supplies is 18% (CGST @ 9%, SGST @ 9%, IGST @ 18%),
except transportation service which attracts GST @ 5%.
(d) There is no opening ITC available in the relevant period in electronic credit ledger of
Mr Dinanath.
(e) All the goods purchased by Mr Dinanath is ex-shop and he arranges his own transportation
through GTA.
Note. All the above amounts are exclusive of GST, wherever applicable.
Based on the facts of the case scenario given above, choose the most appropriate answer to the
following questions:-
(I) The total value of inward supplies on which GST is payable by Mr Dinanath under reverse charge
is-
(a) Rs.2.40 lakh
(b) Rs.2.10 lakh
(c) Rs.2.90 lakh
(d) Rs.3.00 lakh
(II) The total value of inward supplies received during the month of December, not eligible for input
tax credit (ITC) is -
(a) Rs.2,50,000
(b) Rs.2,85,000
(c) Rs.2,90,000
(d) Rs.3,25,000
(III) The gross GST liability of Mr Dinanath for the month of December, assuming that no ITC is
claimed/availed is -
(a) Rs.9,17,200
(b) Rs.9,43,200
(c) Rs.9,26,200
(d) Rs.9,20,800
(IV) Which of the following statement is incorrect?
(i) Tax liability under reverse charge can be discharged through electronic credit ledger.
(ii) Transportation of goods by a registered person other than goods transport agency is not
covered under reverse charge.
(iii) Inward supply of taxable goods which get damaged/destroyed is not eligible for ITC.

(a) (i)
(b) (ii)
(c) (iii)
(d) (i),(ii) and (iii)
(V) The penalty that may be leviable for failure to display Registration Certificate & GSTIN in a
prominent location at principal place of business & at every additional place of business is:-
(a) Rs.5000
(b) Rs.10,000
(c) Rs.25,000
(d) Nil (5 x 2 Marks each =10 Marks)
3. Being aggrieved by the order of proper officer, a tax payer filed an appeal for issue of pending refund
amount. The Appellate authority ordered in favor of tax payer and granted refund of Rs.5,00,000/ - and
interest of Rs.80,000 on that refund amount totalling to Rs. 5,80,000 on 06.10.2020. In its order,
Authority instead of adding the interest to the refund, mistakenly subtracted Rs. 80,000 and refund
granted in the order totalled to Rs. 4,20,000.The taxpayer vexed up with the next process and
accepted Rs. 4,20,000 as refund and did not apply for rectification. The authority, suo moto wants to
rectify the mistake after 3 years. What is the time limit for rectification of mistake apparent from
record?
(a) 3 months from the date of issue of order i.e., 06.01.2021.
(b) 6 months from the date of issue of order i.e., 06.04.2021.
(c) No time limit for rectification of mistake.
(d) Since tax payer has not applied for rectification, mistake cannot be rectified. (2 Marks)
4. Mehta & Co. imported certain goods and cleared them for home consumption on 5 th April, 2020 after
paying import duty of Rs. 5,00,000. It used the imported goods and placed them under Customs
control for export on 15 th October, 2020. Which of the following statement(s) is correct in respect of
duty drawback of imported goods under customs law?
(a) Drawback amounting to Rs. 4,75,000 is allowed.
(b) Drawback amounting to Rs. 3,75,000 is allowed.
(c) Drawback amounting to Rs. 5,00,000 is allowed.
(d) No duty drawback is allowed where imported goods are used before re-exportation. (2 Marks)
5. Which of the following is not the function of GST Council?
(a) To make recommendations on goods and services that may be exempted from GST.
(b) To make recommendations on the rates including floor rates with bands of GST.
(c) To determine tax not paid/short paid for any reason other than fraud.
(d) To establish a mechanism to adjudicate any dispute between the Government of India and one or
more States. (1 Mark)
6. Which of the following statements is correct in case of pilfered goods under Customs?
(a) Refund of duty can be claimed in case of pilfered goods
(b) Duty is not required to be paid in case of pilfered goods.

(c) Duty drawback can be availed in case of pilfered goods.
(d) Duty is payable at the reduced rates in case of pilfered goods. (1 Mark)
7. Which of the following statements is most appropriate in case of dutiable goods under customs law?
(a) Dutiable goods means any goods which are chargeable to duty.
(b) Dutiable goods means any goods on which duty has not been paid.
(c) Dutiable goods means any goods which are chargeable to duty and on which duty has been paid.
(d) Dutiable goods means any goods which are chargeable to duty and on which duty has not been
paid. (1 Mark)
8. Goods other than restricted goods, including edible items, of -------- value in a licensing year, may be
exported as a gift.
(a) Rs. 1,00,000
(b) Rs. 2,00,000
(c) Rs. 5,00,000
(d) Rs. 10,00,000 (1 Mark)
9. Rajkamal Cooperative Housing Society, registered under GST charges Rs. 21,000 as a general
maintenance charge for the quarter April, 2020 to June, 2020 from Jaimin Sinha holding Flat No. 101.
Jaimin Sinha forgot to pay the maintenance charges on time, resulting into levy of interest. The total
amount charged from him was Rs.24,000 (Rs. 21,000+ Rs. 3,000 for interest).
Whether Jaimin Sinha is liable to pay GST, if yes on what amount?
(a) Yes, Rs.21,000
(b) Yes, Rs.24,000
(b) Yes, Rs.1,500
(d) No, not liable to pay GST. (1 Mark)
10. Whether Mr. X, a registered person, can issue single debit note or credit note for one or more
invoices?
(a) No, for every invoice, separate debit note or credit note is required to be issued.
(b) Yes, one debit note or credit note can be issued for one or more invoices.
(c) No, however, single invoice can have more than one debit note or credit note .
(d) Debit note or credit note can be issued irrespective of issue of invoice . (1 Mark)

1. Sahu Parivar, pumps manufacturer in Vadodra (Gujarat) has provided following details for the month
of May: -
1. As a staff welfare measure, Sahu Parivar has entered into an agreement with PNS Insurance
Company to provide life insurance to its employees. PNS charged Rs. 35,00,000 for the same.
2. It has entered into an agreement with a travel company to provide home travel facility to its
employees when they are on leave. Travel company charged Rs. 1,00,000 for such facility.
6

3. It has entered into an agreement with a fitness center to provide wellness services to its
employees after office hours for a consideration amounting to Rs.80,000.
4. It has availed services of the works contractor to erect foundation for fixing the machinery to
earth, in the factory. It paid Rs. 50,000 for the same.
5. It laid pipelines (from the water source outside the factory) upto the gate of the factory for the
purpose of production facility. The cost incurred for the same is Rs. 4,00,000.
6. For the purpose of smooth and convenient mobile communication in its factory, It has installed
telecommunication tower of a mobile company (with due permission) by incurring Rs. 2,00,000.
Note: All the above transactions are intra-State in nature.
Sahu Parivar has also entered into a contract with AP Refinery, Sambhra (Rajasthan) on 1 st May to
supply and install 16 pumps on FOR basis. The following information is provided in this regard:
List price per pump is Rs. 1,60,000, exclusive of taxes. One of the conditions of the contract is that
Sahu Parivar should ensure a two stage third party inspection for the pumps during the manufacturing
process. Cost of inspection of Rs. 24,000 (for 16 pumps) is directly paid by AP Refinery to testing
agency. AP Refinery requires a special packing for the pumps and the cost of such special packing is
Rs. 86,000 (for 16 pumps). Sahu Parivar arranges for erection and testing of the pumps supplied by it
at AP Refinery’s site. Cost of erection etc. is Rs. 24,000 (for 16 pumps). Goods are dispatched with
tax invoice on 20th May and they reach the destination at Sambhra on 21st May. Lorry freight (for 16
pumps) of Rs. 16,000 has been paid by AP Refinery directly to the lorry driver.
Assume CGST, SGST and IGST rates to be 9%, 9% and 18% respectively. For the relevant month,
the opening balance of ITC of IGST is Nil, CGST is Rs. 32,500 and SGST is Rs. 32,500. All the given
amounts are exclusive of GST, wherever applicable.
You are required to work out the net GST [CGST and SGST or IGST, as the case may be] payable
from Electronic Cash Ledger of Sahu Parivar for the month of May after making suitable assumptions,
if any. (14 Marks)
2. (a) Heron Manufacturers Ltd., registered in Mumbai (Maharashtra), is a manufacturer of cardboard
box. It imports a cardboard box making machine from USA. Heron Manufacturers Ltd. enters into
a contract with Garud Logistics, a licensed customs broker with its office at Ahmedabad
(Gujarat), to meet all the legal formalities in getting the said machine cleared from the customs
station.
Apart from this, Heron Manufacturers Ltd. authorises Garud Logistics to incur, on its behalf, the
expenses in relation to clearance of the imported machine from the customs station and bringing
the same to the warehouse of Heron Manufacturers Ltd. which shall be reimbursed by Heron
Manufacturers Ltd. to Garud Logistics on the actual basis in addition to agency charges.
Garud Logistics provided following details:
S. No. Particulars Amount (Rs.)
(i) Agency charges 6,00,000
(ii) Unloading of machine at Kandla port, Gujarat 65,000
(iii) Charges for transport of machine from Kandla port, Gujarat to 30,000
its Garud Logistics’ godown in Ahmedabad, Gujarat
(iv) Charges for transport of machine from Garud Logistics’ 33000
Ahmedabad godown to the warehouse of Heron Export Import
House in Mumbai, Maharashtra
(v) Prepared and submitted Bill of Entry and paid customs duty 6,75,000
(vi) Dock dues paid 35,000
7

(vii) Port charges paid 40,000
(viii) Hotel expenses 60,000
(ix) Travelling expenses 75,000
(x) Telephone expenses 5,000
Compute the value of supply made by Garud Logistics with the help of given information.
Would your answer be different, if Garud Logistics has charged Rs. 25,00,000 as a lump sum
consideration for getting the imported machine cleared from the customs station and bringing the
same to the warehouse of Heron Manufacturers Ltd.? (9 Marks)
(b) Ramlal Charitable Trust imported 5,000 carpets for charitable distribution in India. The Trust did
not pay either for the cost of goods or for the design and development charges, which was borne
by the supplier. Customs officer computed its FOB value at USD 20,000 (inclu ding design and
development charges), which was accepted by the Trust. Other details obtained were as follows:
Sl. No. Particulars Amount (Rs.)
1. Freight paid (air) (in USD) 4,500
2. Design & development charges paid in USA (in USD) 2,500
3. Commission payable to an agent in India (in Rs.) 12,500
4. Exchange rate notified by CBIC and rate of basic duty is as
follows:
Date of Bill of Entry BCD Exchange Rate
10.05.2020 15% Rs. 70
Date of arrival of aircraft BCD Exchange Rate
20.05.2020 10% Rs. 75
The inter-bank rate was 1 USD = Rs. 72
5. Integrated tax 12%
6. Social Welfare surcharge as applicable
Compute the amount of total customs duty and integrated tax payable on importation of carpets.
Make suitable assumptions where required. Working notes should form part of your answer.
Note: Ignore GST Compensation Cess (5 Marks)
3. (a) Mr. Sheru, an unregistered person and a resident of Pune, Maharashtra hires the services of
Class Ltd. an event management company registered in Delhi, for organising the new product
launch in Bengaluru, Karnataka.
(i) Determine the place of supply of services provided by Class Ltd.
(ii) What would be your answer if the product launch takes place in Bangkok?
(iii) What would be your answer if Mr. Sheru is a registered person and product launch takes
place in-
(a) Bengaluru
(b) Bangkok? (5 Marks)
(b) Hodu Ltd., Mumbai, holds 51% of shares of Wanky Inc., a USA based company. Wanky Inc.
provides business auxiliary services to Hodu Ltd. From the following details, determine the time
of supply of service provided by Wanky Inc:

Agreed consideration US $1,00,000
Date on which services are provided by Wanky Inc. 16th June
Date on which invoice is issued by Wanky Inc. 19th August
Date of debit in the books of account of Hodu Ltd. 30th September
Date on which payment is made by Hodu Ltd. 23rd December
(4 Marks)
(c) With reference to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, discuss the validity of the imposition of customs
duties in the following cases:-
(i) Both countervailing duty and anti-dumping duty have been imposed on an article to
compensate for the same situation of dumping.
(ii) Countervailing duty has been levied on an article for the reason that the same is exempt
from duty borne by a like article when meant for consumption in the country of origin.
(iii) Definitive anti-dumping duty has been levied on articles imported from a member country of
World Trade Organization as a determination has been made in the prescribed manner that
import of such article into India threatens material injury to the indigenous industry.
(5 Marks)
4. (a) SS Pvt. Ltd., Coimbatore exclusively manufactures and sells product ‘P’ which is exempt from
GST vide notifications issued under relevant GST legislations. The company sells product ‘ P’
only within Tamil Nadu and is not registered under GST. Further, all the inward supply of the
company are taxable under forward charge. The turnover of the company in the previous year
was Rs. 45 lakh. The company expects the sales to grow by 30% in the current year. The
company purchased additional machinery for manufacturing ‘P’ on 1st July. The purchase price
of the capital goods was Rs. 30 lakh exclusive of GST @ 18%.
However, effective from 1st November, exemption available on ‘P’ was withdrawn by the Central
Government and GST @ 12% was imposed thereon. The turnover of the company for the half
year ended on 30 th September was Rs. 45 lakh.
(i) Examine the above scenario and advise SS Pvt Ltd. whether it needs to get registered
under GST.
(ii) If the answer to the above question is in affirmative, advise SS Pvt. Ltd. whether it can avail
input tax credit on the additional machinery purchased exclusively for manufacturing “ P”?
(5 Marks)
(b) Orip Electricals Ltd., a registered supplier of air-conditioners, is required to send from Mumbai
(Maharashtra), a consignment of parts of air-conditioner to be replaced under warranty at various
client locations in Gujarat. The value of consignment declared in delivery challan accompanying
the goods is Rs. 60,000. Orip Electricals Ltd. claims that since movement of goods to Gujarat is
caused due to reasons other than supply, e-way bill is not mandatorily required to be generated
in this case.
You are required to examine the technical veracity of the claim made by Orip Electricals Ltd.
(4 Marks)
product. An exemption notification was in force providing exemption in respect of specified raw

(5 Marks)
5. (a) Jaiveer & Co. self-assessed its tax liability as Rs. 1,17,000 for the month of April, but failed to
make the payment.
Subsequently the Department initiated penal proceedings against Jaiveer & Co. for recovery of
penalty under section 73 of the CGST Act, 2017 for failure to pay GST and issued show cause
notice on 10th August which was received by Jaiveer & Co. on 14th August.
Jaiveer & Co. deposited the tax along with interest on 25 th August and informed the department
on the same day.
Department is contending that he is liable to pay a penalty of Rs. 58,500 (i.e. 50% of
Rs. 1,17,000).
Examine the correctness of the stand taken by the Department with reference to the provisions of
the CGST Act. Explain the relevant provisions in brief. (5 Marks)
(b) Ms. Kiya had filed an appeal before the Appellate Tribunal against an order of the Appellate
Authority where the issue involved relates to place of supply. The order of Appellate Tribunal is
also in favour of the Department. Ms. Kiya now wants to file an appeal against the decision of
the Appellate Authority as she feels the stand taken by her is correct.
You are required to advise her suitably with regard to filing of an appeal before the appellate
forum higher than the Appellate Tribunal. (4 Marks)
(c) M/s. QTE imports copper concentrate from different suppliers. At the time of import, the seller
issues a provisional invoice and the goods are provisionally assessed under section 18 of the
Customs Act, 1962 based on the invoice. When the final invoice is raised, based on the price
prevalent in the London Metal Exchange on a predetermined date as agreed in the contract
between the buyer and seller, the assessments are finalized on the basis of the price in such
invoices.
M/s QTE has filed a refund claim arising out of the finalization of the bill of entry by the
authorities. The Department, however, has rejected the refund claim on the grounds of unjust
enrichment. Discuss whether the action of the department is correct in law? (5 Marks)
6. (a) Discuss briefly provisions of CGST Act, 2017 regarding questions for which advance ruling can
be sought. (5 Marks)
(b) State the circumstances when the proper officer can authorize ‘arrest’ of any person under the
CGST Act, 2017. (4 Marks)
(c) What do you understand by the term ‘Foreign Trade Policy’ (FTP)? Which is the governing
legislation for FTP? Which Government authorities administer FTP in India? (5 Marks)
10

MOCK TEST PAPER 1
SUGGESTED ANSWERS
Division A
1 I (b)
II (a)
III (d)
IV (b)
V (a)
2 I (a)
II (b)
III (a)
IV (a)
V (c)
3 (c)
4 (b)
5 (c)
6 (b)
7 (d)
8 (c)
9 (b)
10 (b)
Division B
1. Computation of net GST payable by Sahu Parivar for the month of May
Particulars CGST (Rs.) SGST IGST (Rs.)
(Rs.)
Output tax liability [Working Note 1] 4,87,800
Less: ITC of CGST [Working Note 2] (37,000)
Less: ITC of SGST has been utilized only after (37,000)
ITC of CGST has been utilized fully in terms of
proviso to section 49(5)(c) [Working Note 2]
Net GST payable from Electronic Cash 4,13,800
Ledger

Working Note 1
Computation of output tax liability of Sahu Parivar for the month of May
Particulars Amount
(Rs.)
List price of 16 pumps (Rs. 1,60,000 x 16) 25,60,000
Add: Amount paid by AP Refinery to testing agency [Note 1(i)] 24,000
Add: Special packing [Note 1(ii)] 86,000
Add: Erection and testing at site [Note 1(ii)] 24,000
Add: Freight [Note 1(iii)] 16,000
Value of taxable supply 27,10,000
IGST @ 18% [Note 2] 4,87,800
Notes:
(1) As per section 15(2) of the CGST Act, 2017:-
(i) Any amount that the supplier is liable to pay in relation to a supply but which has been
incurred by the recipient of the supply and not included in the price actually paid or payable
for the goods shall be included in the value of supply.
Since, in the given case, arranging inspection was the liability of the supplier, the same
should be included in the value of supply, charges for the same, however, have been paid
directly to the third party service provider by the recipient. Therefore, the value shall be
included in taxable value.
(ii) Any amount charged for anything done by the supplier in respect of the supply of goods at
the time of, or before delivery of goods shall be included in the value of supply.
(iii) Any amount that the supplier is liable to pay in relation to a supply but which has been
incurred by the recipient of the supply and not included in the price actually paid or payable
for the goods shall be included in the value of supply.
Since, in the given case, the supply contract is on FOR basis, payment of freight is the
liability of supplier but the same has been paid by the recipient and thus, should be included
in the value of supply.
(2) As per section 10(1) of the IGST Act, 2017, where the supply involves movement of goods, the
place of supply is the location of the goods at the time at which the movement of goods
terminates for delivery to the recipient, which in the given case is Sambhra (Rajasthan). Since
the location of the supplier (Gujarat) and the place of supply (Rajasthan) are in two different
States, the supply is an inter-State supply liable to IGST.
Working Note 2
Computation of ITC available with Sahu Parivar for the month of May
Particulars CGST @ 2.5% SGST @ 2.5%
(Rs.) (Rs.)
Opening ITC 32,500 32,500
Services of PNS Insurance company to provide life insurance Nil Nil
to employees [Note 1]
Services of travel company to provide home travel facility to Nil Nil
employees Note 1]
2

Services of fitness center to provide wellness services to
employees [Note 1] Nil Nil
Wok contract services availed for erecting foundation for 4,500 4,500
fixing the machinery to the earth in the factory [Note 2]
Laying of pipeline up to the gate of factory from water source Nil Nil
located outside the factory [Note 3]
Installation of telecommunication towers [Note 3] Nil Nil
Total ITC 37,000 37,000
Notes:
As per section 17(5) of the CGST Act, 2017
(1) ITC on life insurance is blocked unless it is used in case of sub-contracting or the same is
provided under any statutory obligation. ITC on travel benefits extended to employees on
home travel concession and membership of health and fitness center is blocked unless it is
obligatory for an employer to provide the same to its employees under any law for the time
being in force.
(2) ITC on works contract services when supplied for construction of an immovable property
(other than plant and machinery) except where it is an input service for further sup ply of
works contract service, is blocked. Hence, ITC on works contract services for construction of
plant and machinery is allowed. Further, plant and machinery includes foundation and
structural supports used to fix the machinery to earth.
(3) ITC on goods and/ or services received by a taxable person for construction of an immovable
property (other than plant or machinery) on his own account including when such and/ or
services are used in course/ furtherance of business, is blocked. However, plant and
machinery excludes pipelines laid outside the factory premises and telecommunication
towers.
2. (a) As per explanation to rule 33 of the CGST Rules, 2017, a “pure agent” means a person who-
(a) enters into a contractual agreement with the recipient of supply to act as his pure agent to
incur expenditure or costs in the course of supply of goods or services or both;
(b) neither intends to hold nor holds any title to the goods or services or both so procured or
supplied as pure agent of the recipient of supply;
(c) does not use for his own interest such goods or services so procured; and
(d) receives only the actual amount incurred to procure such goods or services in addition to
the amount received for supply he provides on his own account.
The supplier needs to fulfil all the above conditions in order to qualify as a pure agent.
In the given case, Garud Logistics has entered into a contractual agreement with recipient of
supply, Heron Manufacturers Ltd., to incur, on behalf of such recipient, the expenses mentioned
in S. No. (ii) to (vii) incurred in relation to clearance of the imported machine from the customs
station and bringing the same to the warehouse of the recipient. Further, Garud Logistics does
not hold any title to said services and does not use them for his own interest.
Lastly, Garud Logistics receives only the actual amount incurred to procure such services in
addition to agency charges. Thus, Garud Logistics qualifies as a pure agent.
Further, rule 33 of the CGST Rules, 2017 stipulates that notwithstanding anything contained in
the provisions of Chapter IV – Determination of Value of supply, the expenditure or costs incurred

by a supplier as a pure agent of the recipient of supply shall be excluded from the value of
supply, if all the following conditions are satisfied, namely-
(I) the supplier acts as a pure agent of the recipient of the supply, when he makes the payment
to the third party on authorisation by such recipient;
(II) the payment made by the pure agent on behalf of the recipient of supply has been
separately indicated in the invoice issued by the pure agent to the recipient of service; and
(III) the supplies procured by the pure agent from the third party as a pure agent of the recipient
of supply are in addition to the services he supplies on his own account.
Since conditions (I) to (III) mentioned above are satisfied in the given case, expenses (ii) to (vii)
incurred by Garud Logistics as a pure agent of Heron Manufacturers Ltd. shall be excluded from
the value of supply.
Accordingly, value of supply made by Garud Logistics is as follows:
Particulars Amount
(Rs.)
Agency charges 6,00,000
Add: Unloading of machine at Kandla port, Gujarat Nil
Charges for transport of machine from Kandla port, Gujarat to its Nil
godown in Ahmedabad, Gujarat
Charges for transport of machine from Rudra Logistics’ Ahmedabad Nil
godown to the warehouse of Heron Export Import House in
Mumbai, Maharashtra
Customs duty Nil
Dock charges Nil
Port charges Nil
Hotel expenses 60,000
Travelling expenses 75,000
Telephone expenses 5,000
Yes, the answer would be different. If lump sum amount of Rs. 25,00,000 is paid, then the value
of supply shall be Rs. 25,00,000 and tax shall be charged on value of supply, since individual
cost are not given.
(b) Computation of total customs duty and integrated tax payable
Particulars Amount
FOB value computed by Customs Officer (including design and 20,000 US $
development charges)
Exchange rate [Note 1] Rs. 70 per $
Rs.
FOB value computed by Customs Officer (in rupees) 14,00,000.00
Add: Commission payable to agent in India 12,500.00
FOB value as per customs 14,12,500.00
Add: Air freight (Rs. 14,12,500 × 20%) [Note 2] 2,82,500.00
Add: Insurance (1.125% of Rs. 14,12,500) [Note 3] 15,890.63
4

CIF value for customs purposes 17,10,890.63
Assessable value 17,10,890.63
Add: Basic custom duty @ 10% (Rs.17,10,890.63× 10%) – rounded off 1,71,089
[Note 4]
Add: Social Welfare surcharge @ 10% on Rs. 1,71,089 rounded off 17,109
Total 18,99,089
Integrated tax @ 12% (Rs.18,99,089× 12%) [Rounded off] [Note 5] 2,27,891
Total customs duty and integrated tax payable 4,16,089
(Rs. 1,71,089 + Rs. 17,109 + Rs. 2,27,891)
Note:
1. Rate of exchange notified by CBIC on the date of filing of bill of entry has to be considered
[Third proviso to section 14 of the Customs Act, 1962].
2. In case of goods imported by air, freight cannot exceed 20% of FOB value [fifth proviso to
rule 10(2) of the Customs (Determination of Value of Imported Goods) Rules, 2007].
3. Insurance charges, when not ascertainable, have to be included @ 1.125% of FOB value of
goods [Third proviso to rule 10(2) of the Customs Valuation (Determination of Value of
Imported Goods) Rules, 2007].
4. Rate of duty will be the rate in force on the date of presentation of bill of entry or on the date
of arrival of the aircraft, whichever is later [Proviso to section 15 of the Customs Act, 1962].
5. Integrated tax is levied on the sum total of the assessable value of the imported goods,
customs duties and applicable social welfare surcharge.
3. (a) (i) As per section 12(7)(a)(ii) of the IGST Act, 2017 when service by way of organization of an
event is provided to an unregistered person, the place of supply is the location where the
event is actually held and if the event is held outside India, the place of supply is the
location of recipient.
Since, in the given case, the service recipient [Mr. Sheru] is unregistered and event is held
in India, place of supply is the location where the event is actually held, i.e. Bengaluru,
Karnataka. The location of the supplier and the location of the recipient is irrelevant in this
case.
(ii) However, if product launch takes place outside India [Bangkok], the place of supply will be
the location of recipient, i.e. Pune, Maharashtra.
(iii) When service by way of organization of an event is provided to a registered person, place of
supply is the location of recipient vide section 12(7)(a)(i) of the IGST Act, 2017.
Therefore, if Mr. Sheru is a registered person, then in both the cases, i.e. either when
product launch takes place in Bengaluru or Bangkok, the place of supply will be the location
of recipient, i.e. Pune, Maharashtra.
(b) Since Hodu Ltd. holds 51% shares of Wanky Inc., Hodu Ltd. and Wanky Inc. are ‘associated
enterprises’ as per section 92A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. As per second proviso to section
13(3) of the CGST Act, 2017, in case of supply by associated enterprises, where the supplier of
service is located outside India, the time of supply is the earlier of the following two dates:
Date of entry in the books of account of the recipient of supply [which 30th September
is Hodu Ltd. in the present case]
OR

Date of payment [by Hodu Ltd. in the present case] 23rd December
Thus, time of supply is 30th September.

(c) (i) Not valid. As per section 9B of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, no article shall be subjected to
both countervailing and anti-dumping duties to compensate for the same situation of
dumping or export subsidization.
(ii) Not valid. As per section 9B of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, countervailing or anti-
dumping duties shall not be levied by reasons of exemption of such articles from duties or
taxes borne by the like articles when meant for consumption in the country of origin or
exportation or by reasons of refund of such duties or taxes.
(iii) Valid. As per section 9B of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, no definitive countervailing duty
or anti-dumping duty shall be levied on the import into India of any article from a member
country of the World Trade Organisation or from a country with whom Government of India
has a most favored nation agreement, unless a determination has been made in the
prescribed manner that import of such article into India causes or threatens material injury
to any established industry in India or materially retards the establishment of any industry in
India.
4. (a) (i) Section 22(1) of the CGST Act, 2017 read with Notification No. 10/2019 CT dated
07.03.2019 inter alia provides that every supplier who is exclusively engaged in intra-State
supply of goods is liable to be registered under GST in the State/ Union territory from
where he makes the taxable supply of goods only when aggregate turnover in a financial
year exceeds Rs. 40,00,000.
However, the above provisions are not applicable to few specified States, i.e. States of
Arunachal Pradesh, Manipur, Meghalaya, Mizoram, Nagaland, Puducherry, Sikkim,
Telangana, Tripura, Uttarakhand.
Further, a person exclusively engaged in the business of supplying goods and/or services
that are not liable to tax or are wholly exempt from tax is not liable to registration in terms of
section 23(1)(a) of the CGST Act, 2017.
In the given case, the turnover of the company for the half year ended on 30 th September is
Rs. 45 lakh which is more than the applicable threshold limit of Rs. 40 lakh. Therefore, as
per above mentioned provisions, the company should be liable to registration. However,
since SS Pvt. Ltd. supplied exempted goods till 31st October, it was not required to be
registered till that day; though voluntary registration was allowed under section 25(3) of the
CGST Act, 2017.
However, the position will change from 1 st November as the supply of goods become
taxable from that day and the turnover of company is above Rs. 40 lakh. It is important to
note here that in terms of section 2(6), the aggregate turnover limit of Rs. 40 lakh includes
exempt turnover also.
Therefore, turnover of ‘P’ prior to 1st November will also be considered for determining the
limit of Rs. 40 lakh even though the same was exempt from GST. Therefore, the company
needs to register within 30 days from 1 st November (the date on which it becomes liable to
registration) in terms of section 25(1) of the CGST Act, 2017.
(ii) Section 18(1)(a) of the CGST Act, 2017 provides that a person who has applied for
registration within 30 days from the date on which he becomes liable to registration a nd has
been granted such registration shall be entitled to take credit of input tax in respect of inputs
held in stock and inputs contained in semi-finished or finished goods held in stock on the
day immediately preceding the date from which he becomes liable to pay tax under the
provisions of this Act.
6

Thus, SS Pvt. Ltd. cannot avail credit for additional machinery purchased exclusively for
manufacturing P as input tax credit of only inputs is allowed when a person gets registered
for the first time.
(b) The goods to be moved to another State for replacement under warranty is not a ‘supply’.
However, rule 138(1) of the CGST Act, 2017, inter alia, stipulates that every registered person
who causes movement of goods of consignment value exceeding Rs. 50,000:
shall, generate an electronic way bill (E-way Bill) before commencement of such movement.
CBIC vide FAQs on E-way Bill has also clarified that even if the movement of goods is caused
due to reasons others than supply [including replacement of goods under warranty], e-way bill is
required to be issued.
Thus, in the given case, since the consignment value exceeds Rs. 50,000, e-way bill is required
to be mandatorily generated. Therefore, the claim of Orip Electricals Ltd. that e-way bill is not
mandatorily required to be generated as the movement of goods is caused due to reasons other
than supply, is not correct.
cannot be denied in respect of goods which are intended for use for manufa cture of the final
leakage and loss on account of damage. The benefit of said exemption cannot be den ied as
5. (a) Due date for payment of tax for the month of April is 20 th May.
As per section 73 of the CGST Act, 2017, where self-assessed tax is not paid within 30 days from
due date of payment of such tax, penalty equivalent to 10% of tax or Rs. 10,000, whichever is
higher, is payable. Thus, option to pay tax within 30 days of issuance of show cause notice to
avoid penalty, is not available in case of self-assessed tax.
Since in the given case, Jaiveer & Co. has not paid the self-assessed tax within 30 days of due
date [i.e. 20th May], penalty equivalent to:
(i) 10% of tax, viz., Rs. 11,700 (10% of Rs. 1,17,000) or
(ii) Rs. 10,000,
whichever is higher, is payable by him. Thus, penalty payable is Rs. 11,700.
Hence, the stand taken by the Department that penalty will be levied on Jaiveer & Co. is correct,
but the amount of penalty of Rs. 58,500 is not correct.
(b) As per section 117(1) of the CGST Act, 2017 an appeal against orders passed by the State
Bench or Area Benches of the Tribunal would lie to the High Court, if the High Court is satisfied
that such an appeal involves a substantial question of law.

Tribunal would lie to the Supreme Court and not High Court. As per section 109(5) of the CGST
Act 2017, only the National Bench or Regional Benches of the Tribunal can decide appeals
where one of the issues involved relates to the place of supply.
Since the issue involved in Ms. Kiya’s case relates to place of supply, the appeal in her case
would have been decided by the National Bench or Regional Bench of the Tribunal. Thus, Ms.
Kiya will have to file an appeal with the Supreme Court and not with the High Court.
(c) Section 18 of the Customs Act, 1962 (dealing with provisional assessment) incorporates the
principle of unjust enrichment in case of refund arising out of finalization of provisi onal
assessment. Sub-section (5) of section 18 of Customs Act, 1962 provides that if any amount is
found to be refundable after finalisation of provisional assessment, such refund will be subject to
doctrine of unjust enrichment.
Further, section 28D of the Customs Act, 1962 places the onus on the person who has paid duty
to prove that he has not passed on the incidence of such duty. In the absence of any proof from
such person, section 28D deems that the burden of duty has been passed on to the buyer.
Therefore, in the given case, the Department’s action will be correct if M/s QTE does not produce
any evidence of bearing the burden of duty.
6. (a) As per section 97(2) of the CGST Act, 2017 advance ruling can be sought for the following
questions:-
(a) classification of any goods or services or both
(b) applicability of a notification issued under the CGST Act
(c) determination of time and value of supply of goods or services or both
(d) admissibility of input tax credit of tax paid or deemed to have been paid
(e) determination of the liability to pay tax on any goods or services or both
(f) whether applicant is required to be registered
(g) whether any particular activity with respect to any goods and/or services, amounts to/results
in a supply of goods and/or services, within the meaning of that term.
(b) The Commissioner of CGST can authorize a CGST officer to arrest a person if he has reasons to
believe that the person has committed an offence attracting a punishment prescribed under
section 132(1) (a), (b), (c), (d) or section 132(2) of the CGST Act, 2017. This essentially means
that a person can be arrested only where the tax evasion is more than Rs. 2 crore and the
offences are specified offences namely, making supply without any invoice; issue of invoice
without any supply; amount collected as tax but not paid to the Government beyond a period of 3
months and taking input tax credit without receiving goods and services. However, the monetary
limit shall not be applicable if the offences are committed again (even after b eing convicted
earlier), i.e. repeat offender of the specified offences can be arrested irrespective of the tax
amount involved in the case.
(c) Foreign Trade Policy is a set of guidelines or instructions issued by the Central Government in
matters related to import and export of goods in India viz., foreign trade. The FTP, in general,
aims at developing export potential, improving export performance, encouraging foreign trade
and creating favorable balance of payments position.
In India, Ministry of Commerce and Industry governs the affairs relating to the promotion and
regulation of foreign trade. The main legislation concerning foreign trade is the Foreign Trade
(Development and Regulation) Act, 1992 FT (D&R) Act.

In exercise of the powers conferred by the FT (D&R) Act, the Union Ministry of Com merce and
Industry, Government of India announces the integrated Foreign Trade Policy (FTP) in every five
years with certain underlined objectives. This policy is generally updated every year in April, in
addition to changes that are made throughout the year.
The FTP is formulated, controlled and supervised by the office of the Director General of Foreign
Trade (DGFT), an attached office of the Ministry of Commerce & Industry, Government of India.
DGFT has several offices in various parts of the country which work on the basis of the policy
formed by the headquarters at Delhi.
Though the FTP is formulated by DGFT, it is administered in close coordination with other
agencies. Other important authorities dealing with FTP are:
(i) Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC)
(ii) Reserve Bank of India (RBI)
(iii) State VAT Departments

Test Series: April, 2021
MOCK TEST PAPER 2
Notes:
note.
(iii) All questions should be answered on the basis of position of (i) GST law as amended upto
31st October, 2020 and (ii) Customs law as amended by the Finance Act, 2020 and
notifications/circulars issued till 31st, 2020.
1. Bright Public School, New Delhi, under the aegis of Bright Minds Society, has provided/received
following services/supplies in the month of March:
1. Provided transportation services to its students, teachers and other staff for commuting to and
from school. Such transportation services are provided to Bright Public School by Ambaji
Transporters.
An amount of Rs. 1,500 per month is charged from students whereas such services are provided
free of cost to teachers and other staff, being part of their employment contract. Consolidated
amount of Rs. 2 lakh per month is paid to Ambaji Transporters.
2. It conducted entrance examination for students of Class 11 for upcoming academic year. It
charged entrance fee of Rs. 1,000 from external students and nominal entrance fee of Rs. 200
was charged from internal students at school. A total of 2,000 students gave entrance exam out
of which 1000 were internal students.
3. The school was an examination centre for Class XII Examination conducted on 27 th March. A
sum of Rs. 15,000 was received from the Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE) for
hosting the examination in school premises.
4. Bright Public School also provides boarding and lodging facilities to its students belonging to
other cities of India. A consolidated amount of Rs. 1,75,000 per annum is charged per student as
a consideration for educational services as well as for services of boarding and lodging provided
to them.
Note: The above amounts are exclusive of GST, wherever applicable.
1

Based on the facts of the case scenario given above, choose the most appropriate answer to Q. Nos.
1.1 to 1.5:
1.1 Choose the most appropriate option in relation to service of transportation of students, teachers
and other staff provided by Bright Public School:
(a) The amount of Rs. 1,500 charged per student is a supply in terms of section 7 of the CGST
Act, 2017 and GST is payable on the same.
(b) The transportation services provided to students, teachers, other staff is exempt from GST.
(c) The transportation services provided to students is not a supply as it has been specifically
exempted from GST under section 11 of the CGST Act, 2017.
(d) Transportation services provided to teachers and staff are exempt from GST. However,
since Rs. 1,500 is being charged from students for their transportation, it is not an exempt
supply and GST is payable on the same.
1.2 Choose the most appropriate option in relation to entrance fee charged by Bright Public School
from the students:
(a) No GST is leviable on entrance fee charged from internal students. However, GST is
payable by school on entrance fee charged from outside students as it is a service in
relation to entrance examination provided to outsiders who are not students of school and
therefore, supply is not eligible for exemption.
(b) GST is payable on whole of the consideration received from students (internal an d external
both) as only services provided to educational institution relating to admission or conduct of
examination are exempt and not the services provided by educational institution for
conduction of examination.
(c) No GST is payable on consideration of Rs. 12,00,000 received from students in the form of
entrance exam fee as such amount is exempt from GST. However, it still qualifies to be a
supply as per the CGST Act, 2017 and needs to be reported in the return for the month of
May as exempt supply.
(d) Since, entrance exam fee is received for admission to the upcoming academic session, the
amount of consideration needs to be amortized over the year and value of such supply
would be reported in the respective month as nil rated supply.
1.3 Choose the most appropriate option in relation to Bright Public School being an examination
centre for conducting conduct of Class XII examination:
(a) It is not an exempt supply under section 11 of the CGST Act, 2017 as services are provided
to CBSE which is not an educational institution (but a governing body) as per the provisions
of the Act.
(b) It is an exempt supply under section 11 of the CGST Act, 2017 as CBSE is treated as
educational institution for the limited purpose of providing services by way of conduct of
examination to the students.
(c) It is not an exempt supply under section 11 of the CGST Act, 2017 as only those services
provided by an educational institute by way of conduct of examination are exempt which are
provided against consideration in the form of entrance fee.
(d) There is no exemption for services provided by an educational institution for conduct of
examination.

1.4 Choose the most appropriate option in relation to boarding and lodging facilities provided by
Bright Public School in addition to educational services and consideration charged thereto:
(a) It is a composite supply where the principal supply is educational services. Since the
principal supply is exempt, the entire consideration of Rs. 1,75,000 is also exempt from tax.
(b) It is a composite supply where the principal supply is that of boarding and lodging services
and educational services are incidental to boarding and lodging services. Therefore, the tax
is payable at the rate applicable to principal supply, i.e., boarding and lodging services.
(c) It is a mixed supply where educational services and boarding and lodging services are
independent of each other. Therefore, the tax is payable at the highest rate of tax applicable
among these supplies.
(d) It is a mixed supply where educational services and boarding and lodging services are
independent of each other. Since educational services are exempt, the tax is payable at the
rate of tax applicable on boarding and lodging services.
1.5 Choose the most appropriate option in relation to supply of service by Ambaji Transporters to
Bright Public School:
(a) GST is payable on the services provided by Ambaji Transporters as they are covered under
section 9(3) of the CGST Act, 2017 which includes services by a transporter.
(b) GST is not payable on the services provided by Ambaji Transporters as services provided
by it do not qualify as supply under the CGST Act, 2017.
(c) GST is not payable on the services provided by Ambaji Transporters as they have been
specifically exempted under section 11 of the CGST Act, 2017. However, section 9(3) of
the CGST Act, 2017 overrides all other provisions of the CGST Act, 2017 which are contrary
to it, thereby making Ambaji Transporter liable to pay GST.
(d) GST is not payable on the services provided by Ambaji Transporters as they have been
specifically exempted under section 11 of the CGST Act, 2017. Tax is not payable on
reverse charge basis on the same under section 9(3) of the CGST Act, 2017.
2. Mr. A is a practicing Chartered Accountant who is supplying the service in the field of auditing and
assurance. His earnings during the current financial year are as follows -
1. Income from the auditing and assurance service provided during the year- Rs. 1,86,00,000
2. Income for acting as an examiner from the ICAI and ICSI (not on their rolls) in the month of June
- Rs. 2,50,000
3. Rental income from a commercial property, during the year- Rs. 13,90,000
Further, in the month of April, Mr. B purchased 10 computers at a price of Rs. 25,000 each, for his
office as new staff has been recruited by his HR team and had availed and utilized ITC on the same.
On 31st October, out of these 10 computers, Mr. A shifted 2 computers at his residence for his son for
learning purpose. Open market value of each of these computers, on 31 st October, is Rs. 10,000.
Mr. A belatedly filed GSTR-3B for the month of December, by 5 days. Value of taxable supply for the
month of December is Rs. 10,00,000 (included in his details of earnings mentioned above). Applicable
rate of tax on said supply is 18%.
Note:
1. All the above amounts are exclusive of taxes, wherever applicable.
2. The opening balance of input tax credit of Mr. A for the relevant tax period is nil. Subject to the
information given above, assume that all the other conditions necessary for availing ITC have
been fulfilled.
3

3. There is no other inward or outward supply transaction for Mr. A in the relevant period apart from
the aforementioned transactions.
Based on the facts of the case scenario given above, choose the most appropriate answer to Q. Nos.
2.1. to 2.5. as follows:-
2.1. Assuming that the current financial year is the financial year 2019-20, Mr. A is required to
maintain and retain the books of accounts for said financial year under the GST law up to_____.
(a) 31st December 2025
(b) 31st December 2026
(c) 31st December 2027
(d) 31st December 2028
2.2. Aggregate turnover for the purpose GST audit is_________.
(a) Rs. 2,02,50,000
(b) Rs. 2,02,90,000
(c) Rs. 2,02,65,000
(d) Rs. 2,02,60,000
2.3. Total taxable turnover of Mr. A for the current financial year is ___________.
(a) Rs. 2,00,10,000
(b) Rs. 2,00,40,000
(c) Rs. 2,02,60,000
(d) Rs. 2,02,50,000
2.4. Which of the following is/are not a supply under GST law?
(a) Service provided as an examiner to ICAI and ICSI
(b) Rental income as it is not related to business
(c) Shifting of computers at home for personal purpose as there is no consideration
2.5. Which of the following statement(s) is/are correct with respect to interest liability of Mr. A, for the
month of December?
(a) Interest liability of Mr. A is Rs. 444 and he can pay the same either from input tax credit
available in electronic credit ledger or in cash.
(b) Interest liability of Mr. A is Rs. 444 and he cannot utilize the input tax credit for the payment
of interest. He needs to pay the interest in cash.
(c) Interest liability of Mr. A is Rs. 2,466 and he can pay the same from input tax credit
available in electronic credit ledger or in cash.
(d) Interest liability of Mr. A is Rs. 2,466 and he cannot utilize the input tax credit for the
payment of interest. He needs to pay the interest in cash.
3. Which of the following statements is true?
1. Services provided by Government ITIs to individual trainees are exempt from GST.
2. Services provided by the State Governments and private service providers by way of
transportation of patients in ambulance are exempt from GST.

3. Services of renting of shops in a hospital are exempt from GST being health care services.
4. Services provided by Police to PSUs are taxable.
(a) 1, 2 & 4.
(b) 2, 3 & 4.
(c) 3 & 4.
(d) 1, 2, 3 & 4. (2 Marks)
4. Where the National Anti-Profiteering Authority determines that a registered person has not passed on
the benefit of input tax credit to the recipient by way of commensurate reduction in price, the Authority
may order:
i. reduction in prices
ii. imposition of prescribed penalty
iii. cancellation of registration
Which of the above options are correct?
(a) i. and ii.
(b) i., ii. and iii.
(c) i. and iii.
(d) i. (2 Marks)
5. In which of the following cases, compounding of offence is not allowed under section 138 of the CGST
Act, 2017?
(a) a person who has been allowed to compound once in respect of any of the offences specified in
clauses (a) to (f) of section 132(1) of the CGST Act, 2017.
(b) a person who has been convicted for an offence under GST law by a Court.
(c) a person who has been accused of committing an offence under GST law which is also an
offence under any other law for the time being in force.
(d) All the cases covered in (a), (b) and (c) above (1 Mark)
6. Which of the following is correct for destroyed goods under section 23 of the Customs Act, 1962?
(a) It is only applicable in case of total loss of goods even if the same can be recovered.
(b) The importer is not required to pay duty on such goods.
(c) The provisions are also applicable even if goods are destroyed after warehousing.
(d) The importer need not prove the loss to the proper officer. (1 Mark)
7. In which of the following cases, importer can claim pilferage and choose not to pay duty under section
13 of the Customs Act, 1962?
i. Goods pilfered while on high seas;
ii. Goods pilfered before unloading;
iii. Goods pilfered after unloading but before order for home consumption given by proper officer;
iv. Goods cleared for home consumption.
5

(a) (i) and (ii)
(b) (i) and (iii)
(c) Only (ii)
(d) Only (iii) (1 Mark)
8. In which of the following cases, can an importer claim abatement of duty under section 22 of the
Customs Act, 1962?
i. Goods pilfered during unloading
ii. Goods damaged by accident (due to negligence of the importer) after unloading but before
examination for assessment by customs authorities
iii. Goods destroyed by accident while being removed from the warehouse after clearance for home
consumption
iv. Goods damaged by accident (not due to negligence of the importer) after unloading but before
examination for assessment by customs authorities.
(a) Only (iv)
(b) Only (iii)
(c) Both (i) and (iii)
(d) (i), (ii), (iii) and (iv) (1 Mark)
9. Electric shaving machine is classifiable under following:
8510: Shavers and hair clippers with self-contained electric motors;
8509: Electro mechanical domestic appliances with self-contained electric motor
As per rules of classification, electric shaving machine should be classifiable under
(a) 8510
(b) 8509
(c) More information is needed;
(d) Can be classified under both (2 Marks)

1. M/s Shivay, a registered supplier, supplies the following goods and services for construction of
buildings and complexes -
- excavators for required period at a per hour rate
- manpower for operation of the excavators at a per day rate
- soil-testing and seismic evaluation at a per sample rate.
The excavators are invariably hired out along with operators. Similarly, excavator operators are
supplied only when the excavator is hired out.
M/s Shivay receives the following services:
- Maintenance services for excavators;
6

- Health insurance for operators of the excavators;
- Scientific and technical consultancy for soil testing and seismic evaluation.
For a given month, the receipts (exclusive of GST) of M/s Shivay are as follows:
- Hire charges for excavators - Rs. 18,00,000
- Service charges for supply of manpower for operation of the excavator - Rs. 20,000
- Service charges for soil testing and seismic evaluation at three sites -
Rs. 2,50,000
The GST paid during the said month on services received by M/s Shivay is as follows:
- Maintenance for excavators - Rs. 1,00,000
- Health insurance for excavator operators - Rs. 11,000
- Scientific and technical consultancy for soil testing and seismic evaluation - Rs. 1,00,000
Compute the net GST payable by M/s Shivay from Electronic Cash Ledger for the given month.
Assume the rates of GST to be as under:
Hiring out of excavators – 12%
Supply of manpower services and soil-testing and seismic evaluation services – 18%
(Ignore CGST, SGST or IGST for the sake of simplicity).
Note: - Opening balance of ITC of GST is nil. (14 Marks)
2. (a) Laxmi Company Ltd., a registered supplier of Bengaluru (Karnataka), is a manufacturer of goods.
The company provides the following information pertaining to GST paid on inward supplies during
the month of April (current financial year):
S. Items GST paid
No. in (Rs.)
(i) Life Insurance premium paid by the company for the life insurance of 1,50,000
factory employees as per the policy of the company. There is no legal
obligation for such insurance for employees.
(ii) Raw materials purchased for which invoice is missing but delivery 38,000
challan is available
(iii) Raw materials purchased which are used for zero rated supply 50,000
(iv) Works contractor's service used for repair of factory building which is 30,000
debited in the profit and loss account of company
(v) Company purchased the capital goods for Rs. 4,00,000 and claimed 48,000
depreciation of Rs. 44,800 (@ 10%) on the full amount of Rs. 4,48,000
under Income Tax Act, 1961
Other information:
(1) In the month of September of previous financial year, Laxmi Company Ltd. availed ITC of
Rs. 2,40,000 on purchase of raw material which was directly sent to job worker's premises
under a challan on 25 th September (previous financial year). The said raw material has not
been received back from the job worker up to 30 th April (current financial year).
(2) All the above inward supplies except at S. No. (iii) above have been used in the
manufacture of taxable goods. Inward supplies at S. No. (iii) above have been used in the
manufacture of exempt goods.
7

Compute the amount of net ITC available with Laxmi Company Ltd. for the month of April with
necessary explanations for the treatment of various items as per the provisions of the CGST Act.
Subject to the information given above, assume that all the other conditions necessary for
availing ITC have been fulfilled. (9 Marks)
(b) A material was imported by air at CIF price of 5,000 US$. Freight paid was 1,500 US$ and
insurance cost was 500 US$. The banker realized the payment from importer at the exchange
rate of Rs. 71 per dollar. Central Board of Indirect taxes and Customs notified the exchange rate
as Rs. 70 per US$. Find the value of the material for the purpose of levying customs duty.
(5 Marks)
3. (a) Priyesh Inc., a corn chips manufacturing company based in USA, intends to launch its products in
India. However, the company wishes to know the taste and sensibilities of Indians before
launching its products in India. For this purpose, Priyesh Inc. has approached ABC Consultants,
Mumbai, (Maharashtra) to carry out a survey in India to enable it to make changes, if any, in its
products to suit Indian taste.
The survey is to be solely based on the oral replies of the surveyees; they will not be provided
any sample by Priyesh Inc. to taste. ABC Consultants will be paid in convertible foreign exchange
for the assignment.
With reference to the provisions of GST law, determine the place of supply of the service. Also,
explain whether the said supply will amount to export of service? (5 Marks)
(b) Tyan Industries Ltd. has entered into a contract with Vyan Ltd. to supply gas by a pipeline to
Vyan Ltd. for a period of one year. As per the terms of the contract-
(i) Vyan Ltd. shall make monthly payments [Payment for a month shall be made by 7 th day of
the next month]
(ii) Every quarter, Tyan Industries Ltd. shall issue a statement of account showing the quantity
and value of goods dispatched, payments received and payment due.
(iii) The differential amount, if any, as mentioned in the statement of account shall be paid by
Vyan Ltd.
The details of the various events are:
August 5, September 5, October 6 Payments of Rs. 2 lakh made in each month for the
quarter July-September
October 3 Statement of accounts for the quarter July –
September issued by the supplier showing amount of
Rs. 2,56,000 as unpaid
October 17 Balance payment of Rs. 56,000 received by supplier
for the quarter July – September
Determine the time of supply of goods for the purpose of payment of tax. (4 Marks)
(c) Himsire Industries has challenged the imposition of anti-dumping duty retrospectively from the
date prior to the date of imposition of anti-dumping duty on the grounds that it is unconstitutional.
Explain whether it would succeed in its contention. (5 Marks)

4. (a) Casa Pacific, having its head office in Chennai, Tamil Nadu carries on the following activities with
respective turnovers in a financial year:
Rs.
Supply of petrol at Chennai, Tamil Nadu 18,00,000
Value of inward supplies on which tax is payable on reverse charge basis 9,00,000
without payment of consideration
Value of taxable supplies at Manipur branch 11,50,000
It argues that it does not have taxable turnover crossing threshold limit of Rs.40,00,000 either at
Chennai, Tamil Nadu or Bengaluru, Karnataka and including turnover at Manipur branch. It
believes that the determination of aggregate turnover is not required for the purpose of obtaining
registration, but is required for determining composition levy.
Decide based on the above facts:
(i) The aggregate turnover of Casa Pacific.
(ii) All conditions that fulfil the requirements for registration under CGST Act in the given
circumstances. (6 Marks)
(b) Brahma Ltd. exported service valued at US $ 1,00,000. Supply of service was completed on 15 th
January. Payment for this service was received on 28 th February. Refund claim was filed by
Brahma Ltd. in respect of tax paid on inputs and inputs services for Rs. 6,00,000 on 31st March.
The refund claim was sanctioned on 30 th June. What is the amount of refund Brahma Ltd. will get
in accordance with law? What is the relevant date and rate of interest as per GST law? (3 Marks)
(c) High Energy Ltd. is engaged in oil exploration and has imported software containing seismic
data. The importer is entitled to exemption from customs duty subject to the condition that an
“essentiality certificate” granted by the Director General of Hydrocarbons is produced at the time
of importation of the goods. Though the importer applied for the certificate within the statutory
time limit prescribed for the same, the certificate was not made available to the importer within a
reasonable time by the Director General of Hydrocarbons. The customs department rejected the
importer’s claim for exemption.
Examine briefly whether the department’s action is sustainable in law. (5 Marks)
5. (a) Shubi Enterprises is entitled for exemption from tax under GST law. However, it collected tax
from its buyers worth Rs. 50,000 in the month of August. It has not deposited the said amount
collected as GST with the Government. You are required to brief to Shubi Enterprises the
consequences of collecting tax, but not depositing the same with Government as provided under
(b) Mr. Anni had filed an appeal before the Appellate Tribunal against an order of the Appellate
Authority where the issue involved relates to place of supply. The order of Appellate Tribunal is
also in favour of the Department. Mr. Anni now wants to file an appeal against the decision of the
Appellate Authority as he feels the stand taken by him is correct.
You are required to advise him suitably with regard to filing of an appeal before the appellate
forum higher than the Appellate Tribunal. (4 Marks)

(c) Nikky Sales’ imports were being provisionally assessed pending a verification that the
department was carrying out. Upon completion of the verification, the assessments were
finalized, and Nikky Sales was asked to pay Rs. 12 lakh, which it paid. After six months, upon
detailed scrutiny of the verification report and taking legal opinion on it, Nikky Sales filed a claim
for refund of Rs. 8 lakh on the ground that the differential amount should be Rs. 4 lakh only and
that there were factual errors in the verification report. Is this the correct mode of redressal for
Nikky Sales? What will be the likely outcome of the claim? Discuss on the basis of case law, if
any. (5 Marks)
6. (a) When is an e-way bill required to be generated? (5 Marks)
(b) Explain the provisions relating to rectification of errors apparent on the face of record under
(c) Enumerate the various matters in respect of which policies and regulations are framed under
FTP. (5 Marks)
10

Test Series: April, 2021
MOCK TEST PAPER 2
SUGGESTED ANSWERS
Division A
1 i (b)
ii (c)
iii (b)
iv (a)
v (d)
2 i (b)
ii (d)
iii (a)
iv (d)
v (b)
3 (a)
4 (b)
5 (d)
6 (c)
7 (d)
8 (a)
9 (a)
Division B
1. Computation of net GST payable by M/s Shivay
(Rs.)
Gross GST liability [Refer Working Note 1 below] 2,63,400
Less: ITC [Refer Working Note 2 below] 2,00,000
Net GST payable from Electronic Cash Ledger 63,400
Working Notes
Particulars Value Rate of GST
received GST payable
(Rs.) (Rs.)
Hiring charges for excavators 18,00,000 12% 2,16,000
Service charges for supply of manpower for operation of 20,000 12% 2,400
1
excavators [Refer Note 1]
Service charges for soil testing and seismic evaluation 2,50,000 18% 45,000
[Refer Note 2]
Gross GST liability 2,63,400
Notes:
(i) Since the excavators are invariably hired out along with operators and excavator operators
are supplied only when the excavator is hired out, it is a case of composite supply under
section 2(30) of the CGST Act, 2017 wherein the principal supply is the hiring out of the
excavator.
As per section 8(a) of the CGST Act, 2017, the composite supply is treated as the supply of
the principal supply. Therefore, the supply of manpower for operation of the excavators will
also be taxed at the rate applicable for hiring out of the excavator (principal supply), which is
12%.
(ii) Soil testing and seismic evaluation services being independent of the hiring out of excavator
will be taxed at the rate applicable to them, which is 18%.
(2) Computation of ITC available for set off
Particulars GST paid ITC available
(Rs.) (Rs.)
Maintenance services for excavators [Refer Note 1] 1,00,000 1,00,000
Health insurance for excavator operators [Refer Note 2] 11,000 -
Scientific and technical consultancy [Refer Note 1] 1,00,000 1,00,000
Total ITC available 2,00,000
Notes:
(i) Section 17(5)(d) of the CGST Act, 2017 blocks credit on goods/ or services received by a
taxable person for construction of an immovable property on his own account. Here, though
the excavators are used for building projects, the same are not used by M/s. Shivay on its
own account for construction of immovable property instead they are used for outward
taxable supply of hiring out of machinery. Further, excavators are special purpose vehicles
whose credit is not restricted under section 17(5)(a) of the CGST Act, 2017, therefore, ITC
on maintenance service for excavators shall be allowed.
Therefore, the maintenance service for the excavators does not get covered by the bar
under section 17 and the credit thereon will be available. The same applies for scientific &
technical consultancy for construction projects because in this case also, the service is used
for providing the outward taxable supply of soil testing and seismic evaluation service and
not for construction of immovable property.
(ii) Section 17(5)(b)(i) of the CGST Act, 2017 allows input tax credit on health insurance only
where an inward supply of such services is used by a registered person for making an
outward taxable supply of the same category of goods or services or both or as an element
of a taxable composite or mixed supply or where it is obligatory for an employer to provide
the same to its employees under any law for the time being in force.
In the given case, it is assumed that it is not obligatory for employer to provide health insurance
to its employees under any law for the time being in force, therefore the credit thereon will not be
allowed.
2
2. (a) Computation of ITC available with Laxmi Company Ltd. for the month of April
Particulars ITC
(Rs.)
Life Insurance premium paid by the company on the life of factory employees Nil
[Note 1]
Raw materials purchased [Note 2] Nil
Raw materials used for zero rated supply [Note 3] 50,000
Work contractor’s service [Note 4] 30,000
Capital goods purchased in respect of which depreciation is claimed on the tax Nil
component [Note 5]
Goods sent to job worker’s premises [Note 6] -
Notes:
(1) ITC on life insurance service is available only when it is obligatory for an employer to
provide said services to its employees under any law for the time being in force. Since it is
not obligatory for the employer in the instant case and thus, the ITC thereon is blocked
[Second proviso to section 17(5)(b) of the CGST Act, 2017].
(2) ITC cannot be taken since invoice is missing and delivery challan is not a valid document to
avail ITC [Section 16(2)(a) of the CGST Act, 2017].
(3) ITC can be availed for making zero-rated supplies, notwithstanding that such supply may be
an exempt supply [Section 16(2) of the IGST Act].
(4) ITC is blocked on works contract services when supplied for construction of an immovable
property. However, “construction” includes only that repairs which are capitalized along with
the said immovable property.
In this case, since repairs of building is debited to P & L Account, the same does not
amount to ‘construction’ and hence ITC thereon is available [Section 17(5)(c) of the CGST
Act, 2017].
(5) ITC is not available when depreciation has been claimed on the tax component of the cost
of capital goods under the Income-tax Act [Section 16(3) of the CGST Act, 2017].
(6) The principal is entitled to take ITC of inputs sent for job work even if the said inputs are
directly sent to job worker. However, where said inputs are not received back by the
principal within a period of 1 year of the date of receipt of inputs by the job worker, it shall
be deemed that such inputs had been supplied by the principal to the job worker on the day
when the said inputs were received by the job worker [Sub-sections (2) and (3) of section 19
of the CGST Act, 2017].
Hence, the ITC taken by Laxmi Company Ltd. in the month of September last year is valid
and since one year period has yet not lapsed in April, there will be no tax liability on such
inputs.
(b) Computation of assessable value
Particulars Amount
CIF value 5000 US $
Less: Freight 1500 US $
Less: Insurance 500 US $
3
Therefore, FOB value 3000 US $
Assessable value for Customs purpose
FOB value 3000 US $
Add: Freight (20% of FOB value) [Note 1] 600 US $
Add: Insurance (actual) 500 US $
CIF for customs purpose 4100 US $
Exchange rate as per CBIC [Note 2] Rs. 70 per US $
Assessable value (Rs. 70 x 4100 US $) Rs. 2,87,000
Notes:
1. If the goods are imported by air, the freight cannot exceed 20% of FOB price [Fifth proviso
2. Rate of exchange determined by CBIC is considered [clause (a) of the explanation to
section 14 of the Customs Act, 1962].
3. (a) As per section 13(2) of the IGST Act, 2017, in case where the location of the supplier of services
or the location of the recipient of services is outside India, the place of supply of services except
the services specified in sub-sections (3) to (13) of the IGST Act, 2017 shall be the location of the
recipient of services. Sub-sections (3) to (13) of the IGST Act, 2017 provide the mechanism to
determine the place of supply in certain specific situations.
The given case does not fall under any of such specific situations and thus, the place of supply in
this case will be determined under sub-section (2) of section 13 of the IGST Act, 2017. Thus, the
place of supply of services in this case is the location of recipient of services, i.e. USA.
As per section 2(6) of the IGST Act, 2017, export of services means the supply of any service
when,–
(a) the supplier of service is located in India;
(b) the recipient of service is located outside India;
(c) the place of supply of service is outside India;
(d) the payment for such service has been received by the supplier of service in convertible
foreign exchange or in Indian rupees wherever permitted by the Reserve Bank of India; and
(e) the supplier of service and the recipient of service are not merely establishments of a
distinct person in accordance with Explanation 1 in section 8.
Since all the above five conditions are fulfilled in the given case, the same will be considered as
an export of service.
(b) As per Notification No. 66/2017 CT dated 15.11.2017, a registered person (excluding
composition supplier) has to pay GST on the outward supply of goods at the time of supply as
specified in section 12(2)(a) of the CGST Act, 2017, i.e. date of issue of invoice or the last date
on which invoice ought to have been issued in terms of section 31 of the CGST Act, 2017. As
per section 31(4) of the CGST Act, 2017, in case of continuous supply of goods, where
successive statements of accounts or successive payments are involved, the invoice is issued
before or at the time of each such statement is issued or, as the case may be, each such
payment is received.
Therefore, invoices should be issued for Rs. 2 lakh each on or before August 5, and September
5, when monthly payments of Rs. 2 lakh are received. Further, invoice should also be issued for
differential payment of Rs. 2,56,000 on or before October 3, when statement of account is issued
4
Thus, assuming that the invoice is issued on August 5, September 5 and October 3, the time of
supply for the purpose of payment of tax will be August 5 and September 5 res pectively for goods
valued at Rs. 2 lakh each and October 3 for the goods valued at Rs. 2,56,000.
(c) Section 9A(3) of the Customs Tariff Act provides that the anti-dumping duty can be imposed with
retrospective effect provided the Government is of the opinion that-
(i) there is a history of dumping which caused injury or that the importer was, or should have
been, aware that the exporter practices dumping and that such dumping would cause injury;
and
(ii) the injury is caused by massive dumping of an article imported in a relatively short time
which in the light of the timing and the volume of the imported article dumped and other
circumstances is likely to seriously undermine the remedial effect of the anti-dumping duty
liable to be levied.
The duty can be levied retrospectively by issuing a notification but not beyond 90 days from
the date of notification.
Thus, Himsire Industries would succeed in its contention if all the above conditions are not
satisfied.
4. (a) Computation of aggregate turnover of Casa Pacific:
Particulars Rs.
Supply of petrol at Chennai, Tamil Nadu [Being a non-taxable supply, it is an 18,00,000
exempt supply and thus, includible in aggregate turnover vide section 2(6) of
the CGST Act, 2017]
Value of inward supplies on which tax is payable on reverse charge basis Nil
without payment of consideration [Being a taxable supply, it is includible in
aggregate turnover]
Value of taxable supplies of Manipur Branch 11,50,000
Aggregate turnover 33,00,000
Casa Pacific is not liable to be registered in Chennai, Tamil Nadu, if his aggregate turnover in a
financial year does not exceed Rs. 40 lakh. However, since Casa Pacific also makes taxable
supplies from Manipur, a specified Special Category State, the threshold exemption gets reduced
to Rs. 10 lakh in terms of section 22(1) of the CGST Act, 2017. [Notification No.10/2019-CT
dated. 07.03.2019].
Casa Pacific’s argument that it is not liable to registration since the threshold exemption of Rs. 40
lakh is not being crossed either at Chennai, Tamil Nadu, Bengaluru, Karnataka or Manipur is not
correct as firstly, the aggregate turnover to be considered in its case is Rs. 10 lakh and not
Rs. 40 lakh and secondly, the same is computed on all India basis and not State -wise.
Further, Casa Pacific is also wrong in believing that aggregate turnover is computed only for the
purpose of determining the eligibility limit for composition levy since the aggregate turnover is
required for determining the eligibility for both registration and composition levy.
Further, Casa Pacific is compulsorily required to register under section 24 of the CGST Act, 2017
irrespective of the turnover limit as it is liable to pay tax on inward supplies under reverse charge
and it also makes inter-State taxable supply.
5
(b) As per clause (i) of first proviso to section 54(3) of the CGST Act, 2017, refund claim admissible
to Brahma Ltd. on account of export of services being a zero-rated supply, is the unutilized ITC of
Rs. 6,00,000.
Where the supply of services had been completed prior to the receipt of payment, relevant date is
the date of receipt of payment in convertible foreign exchange, i.e. 28 th February [Explanation to
section 54 of the CGST Act, 2017].
As per section 56 of the CGST Act, 2017, where any tax ordered to be refunded to any applicant
is not refunded within 60 days from the date of receipt of application, i nterest shall be payable
@ 6% p.a. from the date immediately after the expiry of 60 days from the date of receipt of
application till the date of refund of such tax.
Since in the given case, tax ordered to be refunded is not refunded within 60 days from the date
of receipt of application, viz., 31 st March, interest @ 6% p.a. is payable.
(c) This issue has been addressed by the Supreme Court in the case of Commissioner of Customs v.
Tullow India Operations Ltd. (2005) 189 ELT 401 (SC). The Apex Court has observed that if a
condition is not within the power and control of the importer and depends upon the acts of public
functionaries, non-compliance of such a condition, subject to just exceptions cannot be held to be
a condition precedent which would disable it from obtaining the benefit for all times to come.
In the given case also the certificate has not been granted within a reasonable time. Therefore,
in view of the above-mentioned judgement, the importer High Energy Ltd. cannot be blamed for
the lapse by the authorities. The Directorate General of Hydrocarbons is under the Ministry of
Petroleum and Natural Gas and such a public functionary is supposed to grant the essentiality
certificate within a reasonable time so as to enable the importer to avail of the benefits under the
notification.
5. (a) It is mandatory to pay amount, collected from other person representing tax under GST law, to
the Government. Every person who has collected from any other person any amount as
representing the tax under GST law, and has not paid the said amount to the Government, shall
forthwith pay the said amount to the Government, irrespective of whether the supplies in respect
of which such amount was collected are taxable or not.
For any such amount not so paid, proper officer may issue show cause notice(SCN) for recovery
of such amount and penalty equivalent to amount specified in notice.
The proper officer shall, after considering the representation, if any, made by the person on
whom SCN is served, determine the amount due from such person and thereupon such person
shall pay the amount so determined alongwith interest at the rate specified under section 50 of
the CGST Act, 2017 from the date such amount was collected by him to the date such amount is
paid by him to the Government.
(b) As per section 117(1) of the CGST Act, 2017, an appeal against orders passed by the State
Bench or Area Benches of the Tribunal lies to the High Court if the High Court is satisfied that
such an appeal involves a substantial question of law.
Tribunal lies to the Supreme Court and not High Court. As per section 109(5) of the CGST Act,
only the National Bench or Regional Benches of the Tribunal can decide appeals where one of
the issues involved relates to the place of supply.
6
Since the issue involved in Mr. Anni’s case relates to place of supply, the appeal in his case
would have been decided by the National Bench or Regional Bench of the Tribunal. T hus, Mr.
Anni will have to file an appeal with the Supreme Court and not with the High Court.
(c) Nikky Sales received an order finalizing provisional assessment on the basis of a verification
report, and requiring payment of Rs. 12 Lakh. They did not contest this order, but made the
payment, and allowed the appeal period of sixty days to lapse. After appeal became time -barred,
they filed a claim for refund in which they challenged the order. This was a backdoor method of
seeking relief against the order; it also asked an officer of the same rank to review the order
passed; and it sought to bypass the time limitation for appeal by presenting the appeal as a claim
for refund. The Supreme Court has held, in the case of Priya Blue Industries Limited, 2004 (172)
ELT 145 (SC), that such a refund claim is not permissible for all these reasons. A person who is
aggrieved with an assessment order cannot seek refund without filing an appeal against the
assessment order.
6. (a) As per rule 138 of the CGST Rules, 2017, whenever there is a movement of goods of
consignment value exceeding Rs. 50,000:
e-way bill needs to be generated prior to the commencement of transport of goods.
Further, in the following situations, e-way bill needs to be issued even if the value of the
consignment is less than Rs. 50,000:
(i) Where goods are sent by a principal located in one State/ Union territory to a job wor ker
located in any other State/Union territory, the e-way bill shall be generated either by the
principal or the job worker, if registered, irrespective of the value of the consignment.
(ii) Where specified handicraft goods are transported from one State/ Union territory to another
State/ Union territory by a person who has been exempted from the requirement of
obtaining registration under section 24 of the CGST Act, 2017, the e-way bill shall be
generated by the said person irrespective of the value of the consignment.
(b) Section 161 of the CGST Act, 2017 lays down that any authority, who has passed or issued any
decision or order or notice or certificate or any other document, may rectify any error which is
apparent on the face of record in such decision or order or notice or certificate or any other
document, either on its own motion or where such error is brought to its notice by any GST officer
or by the affected person within a period of three months from the date of issue of such decision
or order or notice or certificate or any other document, as the case may be.
However, no such rectification shall be made after a period of six months from the date of issue
of such decision or order or notice or certificate or any other document. Further, the sa id period
of six months shall not apply in such cases where the rectification is purely in the nature of
correction of a clerical or arithmetical error, arising from any accidental slip or omission.
Principles of natural justice should be followed by the authority carrying out such rectification, if it
adversely affects any person.
7
(c) Following issues are covered under FTP 2015-2020 -
 General provisions regarding import and export of goods – Chapter 2 of FTP 2015-2020.
 Export from India Scheme [MEIS and SEIS] to encourage exports of specified goods to
specified countries and also export of services – Chapter 3 of FTP 2015-2020.
 Duty Exemption and Remission Schemes [Advance Authorisation, DFIA and Duty Drawback
Scheme and duty remissions schemes under GST law] to enable exporters to import inputs
without payment of customs duty – Chapter 4 of FTP 2015-2020.
 Export Promotion Capital Goods (EPCG) scheme [to obtain capital goods without payment
of customs duty] – Chapter 5 of FTP 2015-2020.
 EOU/EHTP/STP and BTP schemes – Chapter 6 of FTP 2015-2020.
 Deemed Exports – Chapter 7 of FTP 2015-2020.
 Quality Complaints and Trade Disputes – Chapter 8 of FTP 2015-2020.
Policy in respect of Special Economic Zones [SEZ] is contained in SEZ Act, 2005 and Rules.

Idt MTP - May 2018 To May 2021

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Idt MTP - May 2018 To May 2021

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Idt MTP - May 2018 To May 2021

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Test Series: March, 2018

MOCK TEST PAPER

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India

Sl. Particulars Amount

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India

MOCK TEST PAPER

S. Particulars Eligible input tax credit

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India

Particulars CGST* SGST* IGST* Total

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India

Test Series: August, 2018

MOCK TEST PAPER - 1

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India Telegram - https://t.me/charteredaccountantsguide

(iii) Supply of man power operator service 18%

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India Telegram - https://t.me/charteredaccountantsguide

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India Telegram - https://t.me/charteredaccountantsguide

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India Telegram - https://t.me/charteredaccountantsguide

Determine duty drawback with explanations in the above cases. (5 Marks)

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India Telegram - https://t.me/charteredaccountantsguide

Test Series: August, 2018

MOCK TEST PAPER - 1

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India Telegram - https://t.me/charteredaccountantsguide

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India Telegram - https://t.me/charteredaccountantsguide

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India Telegram - https://t.me/charteredaccountantsguide

[Since charges per day are below Rs. 10,000]

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India Telegram - https://t.me/charteredaccountantsguide

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India Telegram - https://t.me/charteredaccountantsguide

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India Telegram - https://t.me/charteredaccountantsguide

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India Telegram - https://t.me/charteredaccountantsguide

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India Telegram - https://t.me/charteredaccountantsguide

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India Telegram - https://t.me/charteredaccountantsguide

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India Telegram - https://t.me/charteredaccountantsguide

Test Series: October, 2018

MOCK TEST PAPER - 2

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India Telegram - https://t.me/charteredaccountantsguide

B. Truck sent to a client location in Tamil Nadu for carrying out

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India Telegram - https://t.me/charteredaccountantsguide

1. Basic Customs Duty leviable 10% advalorem

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India Telegram - https://t.me/charteredaccountantsguide

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India Telegram - https://t.me/charteredaccountantsguide

IGST - Rs. 0.10 lakh

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India Telegram - https://t.me/charteredaccountantsguide