Influence of Zinc Application in Plant Growth: An Overview
Influence of Zinc Application in Plant Growth: An Overview
Influence of Zinc Application in Plant Growth: An Overview
Email:2hina.18745@lpu.co.in
1. INTRODUCTION:
Zinc is one of the primary plant growth and production micronutrients. It also has the
constituent that was required in small amounts for several enzymes and protein activities
(ChitraMani & Kumar, P. (2020); Sharma, M., & Kumar, P. (2020); Chand, J., & Kumar, P.
(2020). Naik, M., & Kumar, P. (2020); Kumar, P., & Naik, M. (2020); Kumar, P., &
Dwivedi, P. (2020); Devi, P., & Kumar, P. (2020); Kumari, P., & Kumar, P. (2020). Whereas
it is essential for plant growth and plays an important role in a comprehensive range of
processes. The average range of zinc required by the plant is 15-55 ppm and in the growing
medium between 0.10 to 2.0 ppm. Zinc toxicity and deficiency have an adverse effect on the
yield and crop damage.
2321
European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine
ISSN 2515-8260 Volume 7, Issue 07, 2020
Kumar, P. (2020); Kumar, S. B. P. (2020); Devi, P., & Kumar, P. (2020); Chand, J., &
Kumar, P. (2020); Kumar, P. (2019); Kumar, D., Rameshwar, S. D., & Kumar, P. (2019).
Sources of Zinc:
Some of the sources of zinc are given below:
The zinc is available in various forms that can be applied to the soil. The most commonly
used form for zinc deficiency soil is zinc sulphate monohydrate. As it contains Zn- 33% S-
15%. They are few compounds used for the soil application that is dependent on the
deficiency of zinc on the soil. They are follows zinc sulphate heptahydrate contains Zn- 21%
S-15%, chelated zinc as Zn-EDTA (Zn-12%), chelated zinc as Zn-EDTA (Zn-9%), Zincated
urea (Zn-2, N-43%), Zincated phosphate (Zn- 19.4, P2O5- 12.9%), Zinc oxide (Zn-60-80%),
Zinc carbonate (ZnCO3) (Zn-52-56%), Zinc chloride (ZnCl2) (Zn-48-50%)).
Toxicity:
While rare, atomic number 30 (Zn) will be so toxic when it reaches near the 200ppm mark.
Symptoms are described such as the smaller size of the leaves, green sickness of the new
leaves, backward growth of the whole plant, decreased root growth. Additional usually
excess (Zn) will affect the uptake of P, iron, Mn will cause its plant structural deficiencies. If
the pH of the growth medium is small, Zn is additionally on the market for plant uptakes;
thus, (Zn) toxicity is ongoing, take a look at the pH and atomic number 30 levels at growth
medium intervals. Atomic number 30 (Zn) can also be present in certain liquid sources at
high levels and may be absorbed until the water is replaced with newly galvanized metal
surfaces. Until checking the tissue, like the rinse, the foliage first as bound fungicides has an
(Zn) as an energetic component, which adds results to the (Zn) levels throughout the tissue.
As this paper says zinc is one of the most essential nutrients for plant production and growth.
If there is a deficiency then the crop yield would have a major effect. The only way to get to
know the soil's environment is a deficiency or not a single soil check for the zinc. There's a
major part after that in physiologically varies functions. There are major increases in plant
growth and production as well as yield when the deficiency soil is treated. There is no longer
a zinc deficiency in the soil after overtime, as we see the whole India has zinc deficiency soil,
where the farmer is not aware of it.
2. CONCLUSION
As this paper says zinc is one of the most essential nutrients for plant production and growth.
If there is a deficiency then the crop yield would have a major effect. The only way to get to
know the soil's environment is a deficiency or not a single soil check for the zinc. There's a
major part after that in physiologically varies functions. There are major increases in plant
growth and production as well as yield when the deficiency soil is treated. There is no longer
a zinc deficiency in the soil after overtime, as we see the whole India has zinc deficiency soil,
where the farmer is not aware of it.
REFERENCES
[1] Alloway BJ (2008). Zinc in soils and crop nutrition, second edition, published by IZA
and IFA Brussels, Belgium and Paris, France.
[2] Arunachalam P, Kannan P, Balasubramaniyan P, Prabu Kumar G, Prabhakaran J
(2012). The response of groundnut (Arachis hypogea L.) genotypes to biofortification
through soil fertilization of micronutrients in Alfisol conditions. Annual Report of
Dryland Agricultural Research Station, Chettinad, India.
[3] Barrow NJ (1993). Mechanisms of the reaction of zinc with soil and soil components.
In: Robson, A.D. (ed.) Zinc in Soils and Plants, Kluwer Academic Publishers,
Dordrecht, pp. 15-32.
[4] Bell RW, Kirk G, Placket, Loneragan JF (1990). Diagnosis of zinc Arunachalam et al.
6687deficiency in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) by plant analysis. Comm. Soil Sci.
Plant Anal. 21:273-285
2324
European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine
ISSN 2515-8260 Volume 7, Issue 07, 2020
[5] Chahal RS, Ahluwalia, SPS (1977). Neutroperiodism in different varieties of
groundnut with respect to zinc and its uptake as affected by phosphorus application.
Plant Soil 47(3):541-546
[6] Chitdeshwari T, Poongothai S (2003). The yield of groundnut and its nutrient uptake
as influenced by Zinc, Boron, and Sulphur. Agric. Sci. Dig. 23(4):263-266.
[7] Devlin RM, Withan FH (1983). Plant physiology. Wadsworth publishing company:
California.
[8] Doberman A, Fairhurst T (2000). Rice: Nutrient disorders and nutrient management.
Potash and Phosphate Institute of Canada and International Rice Research Institute,
Los Baños, Philippines.
[9] Gobarah ME, Mohamed MH Tawfik MM (2006). Effect of phosphorus fertilizer and
foliar spraying with zinc on growth, yield, and quality of groundnut under reclaimed
sandy soils. J. Appl. Sci. Res. 2(8):491-496.
[10] Imtiaz M, Alloway BJ, Shah KH, Siddiqui, SH, Memon MY, Aslam M, Khan P
(2003). Zinc nutrition of wheat II: Interaction of zinc with other trace elements. J.
Asian Plant Sci. 2:156-160.
[11] ChitraMani, P. K. (2020). Evaluation of antimony induced biochemical shift in
mustard. Plant Archives, 20(2), 3493-3498.
[12] Sharma, M., & Kumar, P. (2020). Biochemical alteration of mustard grown under tin
contaminated soil. Plant Archives, 20(2), 3487-3492.
[13] Chand, J., & Kumar, P. (2020). Yield attribute shift of mustard grown under cadmium
contaminated soil. Plant Archives, 20(2), 3518-3523.
[14] Naik, M., & Kumar, P. (2020). Role of growth regulators and microbes for metal
detoxification in plants and soil. Plant Archives, 20(2), 2820-2824.
[15] Kumar, P., & Naik, M. (2020). Biotic symbiosis and plant growth regulators as a
strategy against cadmium and lead stress in chickpea. Plant Archives, 20(2), 2495-
2500.
[16] Kumar, P., & Dwivedi, P. (2020). Lignin estimation in sorghum leaves grown under
hazardous waste site. Plant Archives, 20(2), 2558-2561.
[17] Devi, P., & Kumar, P. (2020). Concept and Application of Phytoremediation in the
Fight of Heavy Metal Toxicity. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research,
12(6), 795-804.
[18] Kumari, P., & Kumar, P. (2020). Trichoderma fungus in mitigation of rhizosphere
arsenic: with special reference to biochemical changes. Plant Archives, 20(2), 3512-
3517.
[19] Kaur, S., & Kumar, P. (2020). Ameliorative effect of trichoderma, rhizobium and
mycorrhiza on internodal length, leaf area and total soluble protein in mung bean
(Vigna radiata [L.] R. Wilazek) under drought stress. Journal of Pharmacognosy and
Phytochemistry, 9(4), 971-977.
[20] Devi, P., & Kumar, P. (2020). Effect of bioremediation on internodal length and leaf
area of maize plant cultivated in contaminated soil with chromium metal. Journal of
Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, 9(4), 1408-1413.
[21] Sharma, K., & Kumar, P. (2020). Mitigating the effect of biofertilizers on
morphological and biochemical level in pearl millet grown under mercury toxicity.
Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, 9(4), 955-961.
[22] Kumar, S. B. P. (2020). Salinity stress, its physiological response and mitigating
effects of microbial bio inoculants and organic compounds. Journal of
Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, 9(4), 1397-1303.
2325
European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine
ISSN 2515-8260 Volume 7, Issue 07, 2020
[23] Devi, P., & Kumar, P. (2020). Enhancement effect of biofertilizers on germination
percentage and plant height in maize grown under chromium toxic soil. Journal of
Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, 9(4), 702-707.
[24] Chand, J., & Kumar, P. (2020). Biochemical shift of mustard grown under cadmium
contaminated soil. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, 9(3), 178-183.
[25] Kumar, P. (2019). Evaluation Of Internodal Length And Node Number Of Pea
Treated With Heavy Metal, Polyamines And Glomus. Journal of the Gujarat Research
Society, 21(10s), 518-523.
[26] Kumar, D., Rameshwar, S. D., & Kumar, P. (2019). Effect Of Intergated Application
Of Inorganic And Organic Fertilizers On The Roots Of Chickpea. Plant Archives,
19(1), 857-860.
[27] Dey, S. R., & Kumar, P. (2019). Analysis of Available Nitrogen of Wheat Cultivated
Soil Treated with Organic and Inorganic Source of Fertilizers. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol.
App. Sci, 8(8), 2986-2990.
[28] Kumar, P., Siddique, A., Thakur, V., & Singh, M. (2019). Effect of putrescine and
glomus on total reducing sugar in cadmium treated sorghum crop. Journal of
Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, 8(2), 313-316.
[29] Dey, S. R., & Kumar, P. (2019). Cadmium induced biochemical shift in maize.
Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, 8(1), 2038-2045.
[30] Kumar, P., & Pathak, S. (2018). Short-Term Response of Plants Grown under Heavy
Metal Toxicity. Heavy Metals, 69.
[31] Kumar, P., & Dwivedi, P. (2018). Plant lectins, agricultural advancements and
mammalian toxicity. Molecular Physiology of Abiotic Stresses in Plant Productivity,
360.
[32] Kumar, P., & Pathak, S. (2018). Nitric oxide: a key driver of signaling in plants. MOJ
Eco Environ Sci, 3(3), 145-148.
[33] Kumar, P., Pathak, S., Amarnath, K. S., Teja, P. V. B., Dileep, B., Kumar, K., ... &
Siddique, A. (2018). Effect of growth regulator on morpho-physiological attributes of
chilli: a case study. Plant Archives, 18(2), 1771-1776.
[34] Kumar, P., & Hemantaranjan, A. (2017). Iodine: a unique element with special
reference to soil-plant-air system. Advances in Plant Physiology (Vol. 17), 314.
[35] Dwivedi, P., & Prasann, K. (2016). Objective plant physiology. Objective plant
physiology., (Ed. 2).
[36] Kumar, P. (2014). Significance of soil-root system and aquaporins for water
homeostasis in plant-a review. Advances in Plant Physiology (Vol. 15), 15, 324.
[37] Kumar, P. (2013). Food Security and Nutritional Safety: A Challenge Ahead. Journal
of Functional and Environmental Botany, 3(1), 12-19.
[38] Prasann, K., Biswapati, M., & Padmanabh, D. (2013). Combating heavy metal
toxicity from hazardous waste sites by harnessing scavenging activity of some
vegetable plants. Vegetos, 26(2), 416-425.
[39] Prasann, K. (2012). Feeding the future: crop protection today. Acta Chimica and
Pharmaceutica Indica, 2(4), 231-236.
[40] Kumar, P., & Dwivedi, P. (2011). Future Habitat Loss: Greatest Threat to the Soil
Microbial Biodiversity. Journal of Functional And Environmental Botany, 1(2), 82-
90.
[41] Kumar, P., Singh, B. N., & Dwivedi, P. Plant Growth Regulators, Plant Adaptability
And Plant Productivity: Areview On Abscisic Acid (Aba) Signaling In Plants Under
Emerging Environmental Stresses. Sustaining Future Food Security In Changing
Environments, 81.
2326
European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine
ISSN 2515-8260 Volume 7, Issue 07, 2020
2327