Internet Porn and Children Raping Children in Australia
Internet Porn and Children Raping Children in Australia
Internet Porn and Children Raping Children in Australia
Submission 140
Pornhub reportedly has sent child/rape images into Australia and now is reportedly sending child/
rape images of our own Australian children being raped across the world. https://
www.news.com.au/lifestyle/parenting/school-life/sexual-assaults-and-rape-in-australian-schools-
chilling-story-shows-dark-problem-with-porn/news-story/
b3fbd23c5b49c2a1756e3ad53483bc6f#.r1h6s
On 16 Feb, Channel 7 in Brisbane ran a news story documenting schoolchildren streaming porn at
Queensland schools via their smartphones. https://rumble.com/vdvnmb-children-accessing-porn-
at-school-via-smart-phones.html With this school’s limited resources they have initiated protective
measures against their schoolchildren accessing Internet porn which has to be bypassed by the
children. Certainly with the governments’ almost limitless resources it can come up with more
protective measures across Australia to protect the innocence of our children.
The Weekend Australian of 27-28 October in 2018, in a timely reprint just yesterday on 1 March
2021, reports "Disturbing acts of sexualised behaviour among young children are becoming more
frequent in schools as mobile devices result in children being exposed to pornography...". The
article continues, "...the ready accessibility of porn via a simple Google search has led to a rise in
child-on-child sexual assaults across all education sectors as children re-enact in playgrounds and
classrooms what they see online." In other words children are raping children in our classrooms,
playgrounds and schoolyards due to Internet porn. This case concerned an incident reported in
South Australian. Just how many are never reported Australia-wide?
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/education/boys-7-act-out-sex-on-girl-6-risk-of-mobile-
porn-grows-in-schools/news-story/0ebde21dbd439f49e3eafe625ad85a58
The government should initiate Opt-in laws for Internet porn as an immediate step to better protect
our children. The once thriving Australian Dial-a-Porn industry was defeated in the Howard
government era when such Opt-in laws concerning this service were introduced by then-
Communications Minister Senator Richard Alston and passed by the Parliament. There is no child
in Australia holding a credit account needed to access Internet porn; the children's electronic
devices are all linked to their parent's accounts. As in the Dial-a-Porn example - Aussies refused to
sign up for the service - parents recognised the need to protect the minds of their vulnerable
children. I believe they will refuse permission for an ISP to send them pornographic material. The
Australian Federation for the Family is asking the government to come up with a similar plan with
appropriate penalties applied to ISPs who break our laws.
Sarah Golsby-Smith, head of Learning and Teaching at Presbyterian Ladies College in Sydney,
writing in The Sydney Morning Herald 26 February 2021 is on the mark when she writes, “I do not
understand why access to home internet must simultaneously mean access to online pornography.
Why is it that family friendly filters are not ubiquitous at the moment of sign-up with any provider? If
a person wants access to hardcore pornography, then the onus should be on that person to opt out
Online Safety Bill 2021 and Online Safety (Transitional Provisions and Consequential Amendments) Bill 2021
Submission 140
of the family friendly filters, not on the rest of us to find ways to protect our children. I still
remember a friend telling me of preschoolers who had accessed hardcore porn by telling Siri their
new toilet talk words, leaving them traumatised. This is how easy it is, how widespread this
‘education’ is on what a sexual relationship looks like.”
The Australian Federation for the Family has for years been calling for Opt-in measures to be
adopted by the government if the government is serious about protecting children from dangerous
access to Internet porn. Legislative measures should be taken so that Internet Service Providers
must obtain permission before they can send pornographic material to any Internet-connected
device. This is not banning or censoring Internet porn, rather this is simply giving the homeowner,
office worker, family member, schoolroom, etc, the authority over what legally enters its domain.
There are some wrongly pushing for “age verification” laws as an effective answer to this serious
problem. This is a spurious claim. As I stated above, the children’s accounts are all linked to their
parents’ accounts, who of course pass the “age verification” test. Don’t go down this dead end
road. Also some say the Opt-in idea will never work because people will still find a way to access
Internet porn. Isn’t this true with all laws? Imagine if the government had no laws against rape,
murder, theft or assault on the grounds that people will still do it anyway?
The Pornhub block is another important positive step the government can take to show the world
that Aussies are serious about child protection. The Canadian government is presently taking legal
action against Pornhub for the child/rape imagery they distribute (https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/
manitoba/canada-illegal-online-content-child-porn-1.5847695) and certainly the Australian
government should block this Internet porn giant and stop them from sending such imagery into
Australia.
Pornography has a long history of causing harm in Australia and, once recognised, State and
Federal parliaments have, by and large, taken some legislative measures to curb the destruction
and better deal with the issue. It always takes some time for the laws to catch up with the
technology. Now is the time for the Australian laws to catch up with the devastation caused by
children’s easy access to Internet porn.
Although ridiculed in the progressive media, the harm caused by porn in Australia has long been
recognised by the experts. Prominent Victorian Barrister Dr Don Thompson, then-Chairman of
Forensic Psychology at Monash University and Consultant to the Australian Law Reform
Commission in an address quoted in Australian Family Physician magazine to the Victorian
Criminal Justice Symposium (16 March 1991) stated categorically that “pornography is causally
related to sexually violent behaviour.” This expert warning is echoed by former Victorian Crown
Prosecutor Richard Read who says there is “definitely a very clear link between pornography and
sex crimes”.
New South Wales Assistant Police Commissioner Mark Murdoch says porn use among our young
men is “the fastest growing part of the problem of domestic violence” in the Sydney Morning Herald
of 7 December 2014. In an article entitled “How Porn Is Turning Young Boys Into Rapists”
Tasmania’s The Mercury newspaper on 12 October 2014 quotes Assistant Commissioner Murdoch
as saying “easy access to porn has caused sexual assaults by young men to double in 5 years.”
Inspector Sprague established the Spectrum Task Force in Melbourne, the largest task force of its
kind in Australia’s law enforcement history, and states there’s a strong link between pornography
and the amount of sex crimes we get.
In Quadrant magazine, 1 Nov 1993, Hon Dr Marlene Goldsmith published an article entitled
“Pornography and Sexual Violence”. In it she states “We spend millions on affirmative action, we
profess (at least publicly) horror at racism and yet misogynistic visual imagery images are, to
many, sacrosanct. Women (ed. note - I would add children today) are being raped, beaten,
Online Safety Bill 2021 and Online Safety (Transitional Provisions and Consequential Amendments) Bill 2021
Submission 140
murdered, but their right to life and liberty is considered less than than the right to purchase or
profit from pornography.”
Dr Goldsmith’s voice from the grave warns us of the scientifically documented dangers of porn well
before the tsunami of Internet porn. Our schoolchildren’s unrestricted access to it via their
smartphones must be curbed.
Former Aboriginal research consultant, now Emeritus Professor Judy Atkinson in her book
“Looking at the Problem” cites several sexual atrocities caused by porn. She warns, “A worker at a
Northern Territory women’s shelter describes how women are being raped with a stick after porn
videos. Rapes are being perpetrated on drunken women by young boys 10 - 15. Young girls from 8
years upward are being sexually misused… They are being shown hard core porn videos and
encouraged to perform likewise.” Like Dr Goldsmith, Professor Atkinson warns of and documents
this harm (and much more) caused by video porn well before the onslaught of Internet porn.
“On Mornington Island”, according to The Sydney Morning Herald, “men had forced children as
young as 7 to engage in acts depicted in pornographic videos. A 5 year-old boy recently suffered
internal injuries after older boys tried to emulate a scene from another video.”
An 8 September 2006 article in The Australian newspaper headlined “Sexual Abuse A Part of
Culture, Boys Told” it reports, Aboriginal boys as young as eight are being used for sex and told
“it’s a cultural thing”. Then-PhD student Gary Lee from Charles Darwin University is quotes as
saying, “Everyone knows its happening.” Lee reports encountering an eight year-old boy “whose
behaviour was totally sexualised” and did not know how to relate to an adult except sexually,
thanks to exposure to porn.
Such Aboriginal atrocities, caused by white man’s porn, prompted then Federal Minister for
Aboriginal Affairs Mal Brough to claim, “children had to be protected. Its patently clear coming out
of report after report and story after story that there is a major problem with child sexual abuse in
Aboriginal communities.” He rightly claims, “The states and territories must act on this insidious
problem.”
Perhaps now that “this insidious problem” has invaded the elite (white man’s) private boys and girls
schools in Sydney, Adelaide, Brisbane, Melbourne and elsewhere across Australia, indeed
anywhere with Internet access, the government will act by initiating Opt-in legislation for Internet
porn as suggested by Sarah Golsby-Smith in The Sydney Morning Herald article.
“A 12 year-old boy was allegedly raped repeatedly while his hands and feet were bound as a part
of horrific sexual assault by 10 males at a remote Top End community.” After watching a porn DVD
he was anally raped by 6 of the defendants. 3 teenagers then proceeded to rape the boy.
According to the article in The Weekend Australian 9-10 September 2006, “The youngest
defendant was 12, while the oldest was 39.” Northern Territory Magistrate David Leadsman is
quoted as saying the case was “the worst he has ever seen.”
Will the government wait until such atrocious sexual scenarios are reported as occurring in our
private schools before protective action is taken?
New York Times bestselling author, Vanity Fair editor and Harpers Bazaar and New York Magazine
writer Nancy-Jo Sales who once warned me against allowing my granddaughters to have
smartphones, in her book “American Girls” documenting the social media sexual journey
undertaken by American teen and preteen girls says the most common response from the girls
when told their “boyfriends” are showing friends naked pictures of their girlfriends is, “I didn’t know
he liked me that much.” This shocking response is directly due to the ubiquitous presence of and
unrestricted access to Internet porn by the children. Children should be able to mature without
having their thinking warped is such a way. It should be looked upon as a government duty to place
protective barriers between them and access to Internet porn. Opt-in laws will go a long way in
Online Safety Bill 2021 and Online Safety (Transitional Provisions and Consequential Amendments) Bill 2021
Submission 140
providing such a barrier and blocking Pornhub will also give better protection to our children from
the unscrupulous purveyors of Internet porn.
Pornified author Pamela Paul cites the exhaustive work “A Systematic Review of the Effects of
Aggressive and Nonaggressive Pornography” by Drs Lyon and Larsen. 81 peer-reviewed research
studies in a scientific meta-analysis concluded that exposure to pornography does have an
important causal impact. Despite some modern day pornographers use of the lame “non violent
erotica” excuse for peddling their smut, science has confirmed that “Non-violent pornography
contributes to aggressive and callous attitudes and behaviour toward women.” In other words, it
would appear that the porn our schoolboys are watching is causing them to rape our schoolgirls
and treat them aggressively with callous disregard. This is confirmed by reputable experts and
media reports across Australia and the world today. Italian medical journal Medicine, Mind and
Adolescence quotes Dr Claudio Violato in reporting that the negative aspects of porn are “clear
and consistent.”
Nicholas Sampson, head of Cranbrook School in Sydney’s East, warns about the “easy access to
porn” and how it is destroying childhood innocence as does prominent educator Sarah Golsby-
Smith, the head of Learning and Teaching at Presbyterian Ladies College, also in Sydney. They
join many other competent academics and education administrators warning about the dangers of
easy access to porn by our children. Professor Judy Atkinson, Dr Claudio Violato, Dr Don
Thompson, NSW MLC Dr Marlene Goldsmith, Victorian Crown Prosecutor Richard Read, Former
Federal Cabinet Ministers Mal Brough and Richard Alston have all sounded loud and clear
warnings about all forms of pornography. Their voices are joined by such law enforcement
professionals as NSW Assistant Police Commissioner Mark Murdoch, Spectrum Task Force
Director Inspector Sprague, former head of the Child Exploitation Unit in Victorian Police Inspector
Vicki Fraser, former Queensland Police Superintendent Greg Early and former Qld Police Director
of the Juvenile Aid Bureau Nev Taylor in sharing their serious concerns about the harm caused by
porn. Even today’s left-leaning media reporters are now echoing statements of truth about the
harm caused by children accessing porn.
Perhaps the government will listen to the real experts on porn as well as the 2,500 and counting
Australian schoolchildren victims of porn mentioned in the opening sentence of this submission.
The Australian Federation for the Family (AFF), on behalf of its members is calling for the
government to act in the best interests of our women, girls and schoolchildren and immediately
block the Canadian based Internet porn Service Provider Pornhub. Just as an indication of how
offensive Pornhub is, the world’s major credit card facilities, including but not limited to MasterCard
and Visa, have refused to process further credit card transactions from Pornhub. AFF is also
advocating for Opt-in legislation, similar to the type that was instrumental in defeating the
Australian based Dial-a-Porn merchants, whereby ISPs can no longer send dangerously offensive
pornographic material to any computer connected device that has not specifically requested it. We
have been asking Prime Ministers, MPs, Cabinet Ministers and Senators to do this for many years.
Jack Sonnemann with the Australian Federation for the Family has prepared numerous
submissions to parliament and has appeared in public, media and professional forums
internationally documenting the proven link between pornography and sexual aggression. They are
all accessible on his website at ausfamily.org and contain data from scientific conferences, medical
journals, peer-reviewed studies, meta-analyses, international reports, police studies, media stories
and personal testimony about the harm caused by porn and is willing to appear before any forum
to document the truth about porn.