Janelle Harrison GISG114
Janelle Harrison GISG114
Janelle Harrison GISG114
Harrison
GISG
114
Spring
2011
5/20/2011
Geodatabase
Project
INTRODUCTION
My
file
geodatabase
design
is
a
based
on
practical
work
experience
as
an
archaeologist
for
the
National
Parks
Service.
Originally
I
was
going
to
design
a
geodatabase
specifically
for
historic
structures
but
that
is
not
practical
even
though
a
number
of
people
that
work
for
Death
Valley
National
Park
could
benefit
form
having
that
data
accessible
via
a
geodatabase,
but
do
not
have
“clearance”
to
all
sensitive
archaeological
data
so
can
not
access
this
geodatabase.
I
concluded
that
in
the
real
world
situation,
with
the
park
now
having
a
new
severe
up
and
running
ArcGIS
10,
the
most
practical
way
to
solve
this
problem
would
be
to
create
an
ArcSDE
so
that
all
the
data
could
be
stored
in
one
location
and
permissions
could
be
granted
for
different
levels
of
access.
The
hydrologist
and
the
botanist
and
the
archaeologist
could
all
have
levels
of
data
access
set
so
that
there
would
be
some
data,
non-‐sensitive
data,
available
to
other
employees.
So
in
designing
this
project
geodatabase
I
kept
this
in
mind.
The
network
does
crash
a
lot
in
Death
Valley
so
I
know
everyone
would
want
a
file
geodatabase
to
work
in
locally
but
then
the
data
could
be
uploaded
daily
to
the
ArcSDE
geodatabase
running
on
the
new
server.
DESIGN
My
geodatabase
design
takes
into
account
the
fact
that
anything
we
record
in
the
field
can
be
recorded
as
a
point
line
or
polygon.
There
can
be
a
point
on
a
building,
a
line
or
a
polygon
so
each
dataset
contains
a
feature
class
for
each
geometry.
Because
the
National
Parks
Service
has
a
standardized
code
system
for
record
keeping
such
as
assigning
an
ASMIS
(archaeological
site
management
information
system)
ID
to
each
site,
and
assigning
a
WACC
Number
(Western
Archaeological
Conservation
Center)
number
or
ID
to
most
sites
and,
that
every
site
will
be
give
a
state
Primary
number
these
attributes
were
created
as
domains
with
a
“TEXT”
value
assigned
to
them.
I
created
far
more
than
the
assignment
asked
for
but
I
felt
I
needed
to
complete
or
nearly
complete
the
geodatabase
I
thought
would
be
most
functional
for
the
work
I
did
at
Death
Valley
NP.
I
nearly
completed
all
the
conceptual
domains
and
subtypes
that
I
wanted
to
include
accept
I
did
not
add
the
National
Register
Eligibly
coded
domain
and
subtype
(yet)
that
I
mentioned
in
my
Powerpoint.
With
some
time,
in
the
near
future,
I
will
add
this
domain
and
the
codes.
the
design
of
my
feature
datasets
are
to
give
a
person
working
I
the
field
a
quick
guide
to
recording
the
resources
as
per
the
state’s
requirements
without
having
to
type
in
text
on
each
and
every
thing
recorded.
The
drop
down
menus
create
consistency
and
I
know
for
a
fact
that
my
former
co-‐workers
would
appreciate
this
design
greatly
as
most
of
them
hate
to
use
the
technology
because
it’s
so
time
consuming
and
complicated-‐
and
it
shouldn’t
have
to
be!
CONCLUSION
It
took
me
awhile
to
synthesize
the
design
of
my
geodatabase
but
once
I
figured
it
out
I
was
able
to
design
a
geodatabase
that
I
feel
is
very
user
friendly
and
will
only
a
few
domain
modifications
here
and
there,
it’s
a
geodatabase
design
that
could
be
used
as
a
standardized
design
for
all
the
National
Parks
in
California.