Geotechnical Engg 1 Full Module
Geotechnical Engg 1 Full Module
Geotechnical Engg 1 Full Module
WEIGHT-VOLUME RELATIONSHIPS
WEIGHT RELATIONSHIPS SITUATION: A soil sample has a dry unit weight of 17 kN/m3 and a void ratio of
A. Moisture or water content, 𝜔 0.60.
𝑊𝑊
𝜔= 27. Evaluate the specific gravity of the soil solids.
𝑊𝑆 a. 2.77 c. 2.70
B. Unit Weight or Moist Unit Weight, 𝛾 b. 2.75 d. 2.65
𝑊
𝛾= 28. Obtain the unit weight of the sample in kN/m3 when fully saturated.
𝑉 a. 19.93 c. 20.23
C. Dry Unit Weight, 𝛾𝑑
b. 20.54 d. 20.68
𝑊𝑆
𝛾𝑑 = 29. What is the critical hydraulic gradient at hydraulic condition?
𝑉 a. 1.03 c. 1.06
b. 1.09 d. 1.11
RELATIONSHIPS AMONG UNIT WEIGHT, VOID RATIO, MOISTURE CONTENT,
AND SPECIFIC GRAVITY
SITUATION: Soil has compacted in an embankment at a bulk unit weight of
𝑆𝑒 = 𝜔𝐺𝑠
21.0915kN/m3, water content of 12%, the solid particles of soil having specific
gravity of 2.65.
(𝐺𝑆 + 𝑆𝑒)𝛾𝑤
𝛾= 30. Determine the dry unit weight in kN/m3.
1+𝑒
a. 17.33 c. 16.00
(1 + 𝜔)𝐺𝑆 𝛾𝑤 b. 18.83 d. 15.25
𝛾= 31. Determine the degree of saturation.
1+𝑒
a. 50.92% c. 47.33%
(𝐺𝑆 + 𝑒)𝛾𝑤 b. 51.34% d. 83.58%
𝛾𝑠𝑎𝑡 = 32. Determine the air content and percentage air voids.
1+𝑒
a. 16.42%; 0.0452 c. 49.08%; 0.0821
𝐺𝑆 𝛾𝑤 b. 49.08%; 0.189 d. 16.42%; 0.132
𝛾𝑑 =
1+𝑒
𝐺𝑆 𝛾𝑤
𝛾𝑧𝑎𝑣 =
1 + 𝜔𝐺𝑆
𝐺𝑠 − 1
𝐶𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙 𝐻𝑦𝑑𝑟𝑎𝑢𝑙𝑖𝑐 𝐺𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑡 =
1+𝑒
REVIEW MODULE – GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING 1
Plasticity 𝑃𝐼 = 𝐿𝐿 − 𝑃𝐿
𝜔 − 𝑃𝐿
Liquidity 𝐿𝐼 =
𝐿𝐿 − 𝑃𝐿
𝐿𝐿 − 𝜔
Consistency 𝐶𝐼 =
𝐿𝐿 − 𝑃𝐼
Shrinkage 𝑆𝐼 = 𝑃𝐿 − 𝑆𝐿
SITUATION: Given the laboratory results of the Atterberg’s limit test. Plot the
water content versus the number of blows.
A. LIQUID LIMIT
Test Number 1 2 3 4
Number of blows 38 29 20 14
Wt. Of wet
22.47 21.29 21.27 26.12
soil+container, g
Wt. of dry soil +
19.44 18.78 18.75 22.10
container, g
Wt. of container,
12.74 13.24 13.2 13.27
g
Wt. of water, g
LIQUID LIMIT Wt. of dry soil, g
- The moisture content at which a standard cone of apex of 30° and Water content, %
weight of 0.78N will penetrate a distance of d=20mm in 5 seconds,
when allowed to drop from a position of point of contact with the B. PLASTIC LIMIT AND NATURAL WATER CONTENT
soil surface. PLASTIC LIMIT NATURAL WATER CONTENT
TEST NUMBER 1 2 3 4
Wt. of wet
23.20 22.80 17.53 16.97
soil+container
Wt. of dry soil +
20.42 20.19 14.84 14.36
container
Wt. of
12.90 12.95 9.50 9.55
container
Wt. of water
Wt. of dry soil
Water content
PLASTIC LIMIT Average
- The moisture content wherein a soil starts to crumble when rolled
into 1/8 in. diameter thread. 33. Determine the nearest value of the Liquid Limit of the soil.
SHRINKAGE LIMIT a. 45.35% c. 44.52%
b. 46.36% d. 47.19%
- Soil shrinks as moisture is gradually lost from it. With continuing
34. Determine the nearest value of the Plastic Limit of the soil.
loss of moisture, a stage of equilibrium is reached at which more
a. 38.34% c. 42.25%
loss of moisture will result in no further volume change. The
b. 32.71% d. 36.51%
moisture content, in percent, at which the volume of the soil mass
35. Determine the nearest value of the Liquidity Index of the soil.
ceases to change is defined as the shrinkage limit.
a. 1.63 c. 1.73
𝑚1 − 𝑚2 𝑉1 − 𝑉2
𝑆𝐿 = − 𝜌𝑤 b. 1.84 d. 1.79
𝑚2 𝑚2
SITUATION 9: The result of and Plastic Limit tests are shown.
𝑚2
𝑆ℎ𝑟𝑖𝑛𝑘𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝑅𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜, 𝑆𝑅 = Plastic Limit Test:
𝑉2 𝜌𝑤
1 Weight of Moist Soil (g) Weight of Oven Dried Soil (g)
𝐺𝑠 = 128.6 105.4
1 𝑆
− 𝐿 141.4 116.8
𝑆𝑅 100
132.6 109.6
𝑚1 = 𝑚𝑎𝑠𝑠 𝑜𝑓 𝑠𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑠𝑜𝑖𝑙 134.6 111.2
𝑚2 = 𝑚𝑎𝑠𝑠 𝑜𝑓 𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑛 𝑑𝑟𝑖𝑒𝑑 𝑠𝑜𝑖𝑙 136.0 113.4
𝑉1 = 𝑣𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑠𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑠𝑜𝑖𝑙
𝑉2 = 𝑣𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑛 − 𝑑𝑟𝑖𝑒𝑑 𝑠𝑜𝑖𝑙 36. Determine the Plastic Limit of the soil.
𝜌𝑤 = 𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝑜𝑓 𝑤𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑟 a. 19.33 c. 21.35
𝑆𝐿 = 𝑆ℎ𝑟𝑖𝑛𝑘𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝐿𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑡 b. 21.09 d. 21.42
37. Determine the plasticity index of the soil if LL=52%.
a. 30.65 c. 30.99
REVIEW MODULE – GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING 1
b. 30.58 d. 32.67
𝑅𝑜 𝛾𝑑(𝑓𝑖𝑒𝑙𝑑) 𝛾𝑑(𝑚𝑖𝑛)
𝑅𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝐶𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛, 𝑅 = = ; 𝑅𝑜 =
SITUATION 10: A shrinkage test on a clay soil gave the following data: 1 − 𝐷𝑟 (1 − 𝑅𝑜 ) 𝛾𝑑(𝑚𝑎𝑥) 𝛾𝑑(𝑚𝑎𝑥)
Weight of shrinkage dish and saturated soil cake = 38.78g RELATIVE DENSITY – is used to indicate the in-situ denseness or looseness of
Weight of shrinkage dish and oven dry soil cake=30.46g granular soil.
Weight of shrinkage dish=10.65g 𝑒𝑚𝑎𝑥 − 𝑒 𝛾𝑑 − 𝛾𝑑(𝑚𝑖𝑛) 𝛾𝑑(𝑚𝑎𝑥)
𝐷𝑟 = = ( )
Volume of saturated soil cake =16.29cc 𝑒𝑚𝑎𝑥 − 𝑒𝑚𝑖𝑛 𝛾𝑑(𝑚𝑎𝑥) − 𝛾𝑑(𝑚𝑖𝑛) 𝛾𝑑
Total Volume of oven dried soil cake=10.00cc DESIGNATION OF GRANULAR SOILS
38. Determine the shrinkage limit DESIGNATION 𝐷𝑟 (%)
a. 10.523 c. 7.612 Very Loose 0-15
b. 7.216 d. 10.247 Loose 15-50
39. Determine the shrinkage ratio of the soil. Medium Dense 50-70
a. 0.505 c. 1.981 Dense 70-85
b. 0.550 d. 1.891 Very Dense 85-100
40. Determine the specific gravity of soil solids.
a. 2.486 c. 2.311 SITUATION: Following are the results of a field unit weight determination test
b. 2.423 d. 2.376 performed on the soil by means of the sand cone method.
Calibrated density of sand = 1570 kg/m3
41. A soil has plasticity index of 18% and liquid limit of 65%. Find the Calibrated mass of sand to fill the cone = 0.545kg
shrinkage limit of the soil. Mass of jar+cone+sand (before use) = 7.59kg
Mass of jar+cone+sand (after use) = 4.78kg
Mass of moist soil from hole = 3.007kg
Moisture content of moist soil = 10.2%
Maximum dry unit weight in the lab compaction test = 19kN/m3
a. 33.25 c. 33.75
b. 34.65 d. 36.35
45. Determine the dry unit weight of compaction in the field in kN/m3.
a. 18.25 c. 17.84
SOIL COMPACTION – is the densification of soil removal of air which requires
b. 18.56 d. 18.13
mechanical energy. The degree of compaction measured in terms of dry unit
46. Determine the relative compaction in the field.
weight. The moisture content at which the maximum dry unit weight is
a. 96.05 c. 97.68
attained is called optimum moisture content. b. 93.89 d. 95.42
SOIL COMPACTION APPARATUS SITUATION: A soil sample weighing 249kg is removed from a test pit. Water
A. Standard Proctor Mold and Hammer weighing 124kg will just fill the pit. A sample of the soil weighing 113.2 grams
B. Sand Cone Apparatus is oven dried and its weight after oven drying is 98.7grams. Maximum
C. Rubber Balloon Apparatus attainable dry unit weight of soil is 18.8kN/m3 and minimum attainable dry
unit weight is 15.75 kN/m3. Specific gravity of soil is 2.67.
42. The following data were obtained from a field density test on a compacted 47. Determine the wet unit weight in kN/m3.
fill of sandy clay. Laboratory moisture density test on the fill material a. 20.35 c. 19.25
indicated a maximum dry density of 120pcf at optimum moisture content b. 19.70 d. 20.63
of 11%. 48. Determine the dry unit weight in kN/m3.
Weight of moist soil removed from test hole = 1038g a. 17.99 c. 17.74
Weight of soil after oven drying = 914g b. 17.18 d. 16.77
Volume of test hole from Rubber Balloon Apparatus = 0.0169cu ft 49. Determine the relative density of soil.
a. 51.17% c. 69.14%
What was the percent compaction of the fill? b. 76.75% d. 37.49%
a. 99.02 c. 99.65
b. 99.82 d. 99.15 SITUATION: The maximum dry unit weight of soil is 18.8kN/m3 and the
minimum dry unit weight is 15.5kN/m3.
SITUATION: Given the results of a Standard Proctor Test: 50. Determine the relative compaction in the field if the relative density is
Weight of moist soil in 72%.
Water Content, %
Proctor mold (grams) a. 97.83 c. 94.37
10 1485 b. 96.42 d. 99.33
12 1606 51. Determine the dry unit weight in the field, kN/m3.
14 1696 a. 17.74 c. 18.67
16 1757 b. 18.39 d. 18.13
18 1741 52. Determine the moist unit weight in the field if water content is 15%,
20 1651 kN/m3.
The volume of the mold for this test is 1/30 cubic feet (946000 cubic a. 20.85 c. 21.15
millimeters) b. 21.47 d. 20.40
43. Determine the maximum dry unit weight of the soil in grams/cc.
a. 1.63 c. 1.65
b. 1.60 d. 1.67
44. Determine the optimum moisture content in percent.
a. 16.20% c. 16%
b. 18% d. 18.52%
REVIEW MODULE – GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING 1
PERMEABILITY 𝑉 = 𝑉𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑒
A material is permeable if it contains continuous voids 𝑘 = 𝑐𝑜𝑒𝑓𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑚𝑒𝑎𝑏𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑦
𝐿 = 𝑙𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑡ℎ 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑎𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒
DARCY’S LAW ℎ = 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡 ℎ𝑒𝑎𝑑 𝑑𝑖𝑓𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑒
It states that the velocity of flow of water through saturated soil is directly 𝑡 = 𝑑𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑜𝑓 𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡
proportional to the hydraulic gradient. 𝐴 = 𝑐𝑟𝑜𝑠𝑠 𝑠𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑎 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑎𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒
𝑉 = 𝑘𝑖 𝑜𝑟 𝑄 = 𝑘𝑖𝐴 57. A sand sample of 35 sq.cm. cross sectional area and 20 cm long was tested
in a constant head permeameter. Under a head of 60 cm, the discharge
𝑉 = 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑒 𝑣𝑒𝑙𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑡𝑦 was 120 mL in 6 min. Determine the hydraulic conductivity in cm/sec.
𝑖 = ℎ𝑦𝑑𝑟𝑎𝑢𝑙𝑖𝑐 𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑡 a. 0.004251 c. 0.003521
𝐴 = 𝑐𝑟𝑜𝑠𝑠 𝑠𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑎 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑎𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑟 𝑡𝑜 𝑡ℎ𝑒 b. 0.003175 d. 0.003941
𝑑𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑜𝑓 𝑓𝑙𝑜𝑤.
𝑘 = 𝑐𝑜𝑒𝑓𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑚𝑒𝑎𝑏𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑦 / ℎ𝑦𝑑𝑟𝑎𝑢𝑙𝑖𝑐 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑢𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑖𝑡𝑦 B. FALLING HEAD TEST
A test in which the hydraulic gradient is continuously changing through the
𝑉 duration of experiment.
𝑆𝑒𝑒𝑝𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝑉𝑒𝑙𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝑜𝑟 𝐼𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑉𝑒𝑙𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑡𝑦, 𝑉𝑠 = 𝑎𝐿 ℎ1
𝑛 k= ln ( )
𝐴𝑡 ℎ2
𝑘 = 𝑐𝑜𝑒𝑓𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑚𝑒𝑎𝑏𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑦
𝑎 = 𝑐𝑟𝑜𝑠𝑠 𝑠𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑎 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑝𝑖𝑝𝑒
𝐴 = 𝑐𝑟𝑜𝑠𝑠 𝑠𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑎 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑎𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒
𝐿 = 𝑙𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑡ℎ 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑎𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒
𝑡 = 𝑑𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑜𝑓 𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡
ℎ1 = 𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑎𝑙 ℎ𝑒𝑎𝑑 𝑑𝑖𝑓𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑒 𝑎𝑡 𝑡 = 0
ℎ2 = 𝑓𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑙 ℎ𝑒𝑎𝑑 𝑑𝑖𝑓𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑒 𝑎𝑡 𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑒 = 𝑡
SITUATION: For a variable head permeability test, the following data are given:
Length of specimen=200mm
Area of Soil Specimen=1000sq.mm
Area of standpipe=40sq.mm
Head difference at time t=0 is 500mm
Head difference at t=3min is 300mm
SITUATION: From the figure shown, the thickness of a permeable soil layer is
58. Compute the hydraulic conductivity of the soil in cm/sec
1.1m making an angle of 14° with the horizontal K=4.87x10-2 cm/sec, e=0.7., a. 3.1425 x10-3 c. 2.7125 x10-3
S=36m, h=1.4m. b. 2.2703 x10-3 d. 2.4214 x10-3
59. What was the head difference at time t= 100sec, mm?
a. 356.11 c. 376.46
b. 123.54 d. 143.89
TEMPERATURE CORRECTION
It is customary to report this hydraulic conductivity of the soil at standard
temperature of 20 degrees, but this standard temperature is not usually met
that’s why temperature correction must be applied if the temperature during
test is not 20 degrees.
𝑅𝑇 = 2.42 − 0.475 ln 𝑇
60. If the test temperature test in number 57 is 40 degrees, compute the
54. Compute the hydraulic gradient
corrected value of hydraulic conductivity.
a. 0.0377 c. 0.0461
b. 0.0425 d. 0.0333 a. 0.002120 c. 0.004212
55. Compute the flow rate in cu.m/hr/m b. 0.003525 d. 0.004754
61. If the test temperature test is 10 degrees in number 58, compute the
a. 0.0728 c. 0.0731
b. 0.0750 d. 0.0706 corrected value of hydraulic conductivity.
56. Determine the seepage velocity, m/hr. a. 0.002542 c. 0.001934
a. 0.16 c. 0.26 b. 0.001712 d. 0.003011
b. 0.12 d. 0.22
REVIEW MODULE – GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING 1
𝑟
Q ln ( 1 )
𝑟2
k=
π(ℎ1 2 − ℎ2 2 )
𝑘 = 𝑐𝑜𝑒𝑓𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑚𝑒𝑎𝑏𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑦
𝑄 = 𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑒
𝑟1 = 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑓𝑎𝑟𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑟 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑒 𝑓𝑟𝑜𝑚 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑤𝑒𝑙𝑙
𝑟2 = 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑛𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑟 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑒 𝑓𝑟𝑜𝑚 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑤𝑒𝑙𝑙
ℎ1 = ℎ𝑦𝑑𝑟𝑎𝑢𝑙𝑖𝑐 ℎ𝑒𝑎𝑑 𝑎𝑡 𝑓𝑎𝑟𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑏𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑣𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑤𝑒𝑙𝑙
ℎ2 = ℎ𝑦𝑑𝑟𝑎𝑢𝑙𝑖𝑐 ℎ𝑒𝑎𝑑 𝑎𝑡 𝑛𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑏𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑣𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑤𝑒𝑙𝑙
SITUATION: A 500 mm diameter test well penetrates 30m, below the static
𝑘1 𝐻1 + 𝑘2 𝐻2 + 𝑘3 𝐻3
water table. After 24 hours of pumping at 80 liters/sec. The water level in an 𝑘𝑒𝑞 =
𝐻
observation well at a distance of 100m from the test well is lowered 0.5m and
the other observation well at a distance of 40m from the test well, the ∑ 𝑘𝐻
drawdown is 1.1 m. 𝑘𝑒𝑞 =
∑𝐻
62. What is the rate of flow in cu.m per day?
a. 6912 c. 6911 B. EQUIVALENT VERTICAL CONDUCTIVITY
b. 6910 d. 6913
63. Compute the coefficient of permeability of the aquifer in m/day.
a. 55.42 c. 61.32
b. 57.53 d. 64.82
64. Determine the drawdown in the test well, meter.
a. 25.32 c. 25.67
b. 4.33 d. 4.68
𝑟 𝑟
Q ln ( 1 ) Q ln ( 1 )
𝑟2 𝑟2
k= =
2πt(ℎ1 − ℎ2 ) 2πt(𝑧2 − 𝑧1 )
𝑘 = 𝑐𝑜𝑒𝑓𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑚𝑒𝑎𝑏𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝐻 ℎ
𝑄 = 𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑒 =∑
𝑘𝑒𝑞 𝑘
𝑟1 = 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑓𝑎𝑟𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑟 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑒 𝑓𝑟𝑜𝑚 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑤𝑒𝑙𝑙
SITUATION: The data for stratified soil were given as follows
𝑟2 = 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑛𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑟 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑒 𝑓𝑟𝑜𝑚 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑤𝑒𝑙𝑙
Layer Depth K
ℎ1 = ℎ𝑦𝑑𝑟𝑎𝑢𝑙𝑖𝑐 ℎ𝑒𝑎𝑑 𝑎𝑡 𝑓𝑎𝑟𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑏𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑣𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑤𝑒𝑙𝑙
ℎ2 = ℎ𝑦𝑑𝑟𝑎𝑢𝑙𝑖𝑐 ℎ𝑒𝑎𝑑 𝑎𝑡 𝑛𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑏𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑣𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑤𝑒𝑙𝑙 1 4m 5cm/h
𝑡 = 𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑐𝑘𝑛𝑒𝑠𝑠 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑎𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑓𝑒𝑟 2 8m 3 cm/h
3 12m 2 cm/h
𝑟 68. Determine the equivalent horizontal coefficient of permeability, cm/hr.
Q ln ( 1 )
𝑟2 a. 2.535 c. 2.833
T= = kt
2π(𝑧2 − 𝑧1 ) b. 2.521 d. 2.142
69. Determine the vertical coefficient of permeability, cm/hr.
𝑍2 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑍1 𝑎𝑟𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑑𝑟𝑎𝑤 𝑑𝑜𝑤𝑛. a. 2.535 c. 2.521
𝑇 𝑖𝑠 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑠𝑚𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑏𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑎𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑓𝑒𝑟. b. 2.142 d. 2.833
SITUATION: A permeability pumping test was carried out in a confined aquifer SITUATION: The figure shows 3 layers of soil in a tube. Water is supplied to
with the piezometric level before pumping is 2.18m below the ground surface. maintain a constant-head difference of 300mm across the sample. The
The aquiclude has a thickness of 5.7 m measured from the ground surface and hydraulic conductivities of the soils in the direction of flow through them are
the confined aquifer is 7.6m deep until it reaches the aquiclude layer at the as follows:
bottom. At a steady pumping rate of 15.6 cu.m/hr the drawdown in the KA= 2 x 10-3 mm/sec KB= 3.7 x 10-1 mm/sec KC= 1.2 x 10-4 mm/sec
observation wells were respectively equal to 1.62m and 0.47 m. The distance
of the observation wells from the center of the test well were 15m and 32m
respectively.
65. Compute the depth of water at the farthest observation well, meters.
a. 11.68 c. 10.65
b. 12.83 d. 9.5
66. Compute the coefficient of permeability, m/hr.
a. 0.215 c. 0.324
b. 0.293 d. 0.412
67. Compute the transmissibility of the impermeable layer, m2/hr.
a. 2.23 c. 3.13
b. 2.46 d. 1.64
SEEPAGE
72. If the cross-sectional area of the tank is 0.5 sq.m. Determine the effective
stresses at points A and B. If the hydraulic conductivity K = 0.12 cm/sec, and
the rate of seepage is 0.3 liters/sec, kN/m2.
0.60𝑚
𝛾 = 17.9 𝑘𝑁/𝑚3
1𝑚 𝐵
0.40𝑚
𝐴
73. Determine the effective stress at A. Assuming e = 0.50 and sp.gr = 2.70,
kN/m2
0.8𝑚
0.7𝑚
𝑒 = 0.50
𝐺𝑆 = 2.7
2.2𝑚 𝑨
1𝑚
a. 17.421 c. 17.321
b. 17.512 d. 17.622
74. Assuming sp.gr of soil is G and its void ratio is e, determine the critical
hydraulic gradient.
𝐺𝑠 + 1 𝐺𝑠 + 1
a. c.
1+𝑒 1−𝑒
𝐺𝑠 − 1 𝐺𝑠 − 1
b. d.
1−𝑒 1+𝑒