Ge 9 Life and Works of Rizal - M1
Ge 9 Life and Works of Rizal - M1
Ge 9 Life and Works of Rizal - M1
Course Code: GE 9
Course Title: Life and Works of Rizal
Units: 3 Units
Module 1
The mandatory Rizal subject in the Philippines was the upshot of this bill which
later became law in 1956. The bill involves mandating educational institutions in
the country to offer a course on the hero’s life, works, and writings, especially
the ‘Noli Me Tangere’ and ‘El Filibusterismo’. The transition from being a bill to
become a republic act was however not easy as the proposal was met with
intense opposition particularly from the Catholic Church. Largely because of the
issue, the then-senator Claro M. Recto—the main proponent of the Rizal Bill—
was even dubbed as a communist and an anti-Catholic. Catholic schools
threatened to stop operation if the bill was passed, though Recto calmly
countered the threat, stating that if that happened, then the schools would be
nationalized. Afterward threatened to be punished in future elections, Recto
remained undeterred.
The bill was eventually passed, but with a clause that would allow exemptions to
students who think that reading the Noli and Fili would ruin their faith. In other
words, one can apply to the Department of Education for exemption from reading
Rizal’s novels —though not from taking the Rizal subject. The bill was enacted
on June 12, 1956.
RA 1425 and other Rizal laws
The Rizal Bill became the Republic Act No. 1425, known as the ‘Rizal Law’. The
full name of the law is “An Act to Include in the Curricula of All Public and Private
Schools, Colleges and Universities Courses on the Life, Works and Writings of
Jose Rizal, Particularly His Novels Noli Me Tangere and El Filibusterismo,
Authorizing the Printing and Distribution Thereof, and for Other Purposes.“
The first section of the law concerns mandating the students to read Rizal’s
novels. The last two sections involve making Rizal’s writings accessible to the
general public—they require the schools to have a sufficient number of copies in
their libraries and mandate the publication of the works in major Philippine
languages.
Jose P. Laurel, then-senator who co-wrote the law, explained that since Jose Rizal
was the founder of the country’s nationalism and had significantly contributed to
the current condition of the nation, it is only right that Filipinos, especially the
youth, know about and learn to imbibe the great ideals for which the hero died.
Accordingly, the Rizal Law aims to accomplish the following goals:
1. To rededicate the lives of youth to the ideals of freedom and nationalism, for
which our heroes lived and died
2. To pay tribute to our national hero for devoting his life and works in shaping
the Filipino character
So far, no student has yet officially applied for exemption from reading Rizal’s
novels. Correspondingly, former President Fidel V. Ramos in 1994, through
Memorandum Order No. 247, directed the
Secretary of Education, Culture and Sports and the Chairman of the Commission
on Higher Education to fully implement the RA 1425 as there had been reports
that the law had still not been totally carried out. In 1995, CHED Memorandum
No. 3 was issued enforcing strict compliance to Memorandum Order No. 247.
Not known to many, there is another republic act that concerns the national hero.
Republic Act No. 229 is an act prohibiting cockfighting, horse racing, and jai-alai
on the thirtieth day of December of each year and to create a committee to take
charge of the proper celebration of Rizal day in every municipality and chartered
city, and for other purposes.
The academic subject on the life, works, and writings of Jose Rizal was not
mandated by law for anything. Far from being impractical, the course
interestingly offers many benefits that some contemporary academicians declare
that the subject, especially when taught properly, is more beneficial than many
subjects in various curricula.
The following are just some of the significance of the academic subject:
There is a dictum, “He who controls the past controls the future.” Our view of
history forms the manner we perceive the present, and therefore influences the
kind of solutions we provide for existing problems. Jose Rizal course, as a history
subject, is full of historical information from which one could base his decisions
in life. In various ways, the subject, for instance, teaches that being educated is
a vital ingredient for a person or country to be really free and successful.
We can learn much from the way Rizal faced various challenges in life. As a
controversial figure in his time, he encountered serious dilemmas and
predicaments but responded decently and highmindedly. Through the crucial
decisions he made in his life, we can sense his priorities and convictions which
manifest how noble, selfless, and great the national hero was. For example, his
many resolutions exemplified the aphorism that in this life there are things more
important than personal feeling and happiness.
If one is looking for someone to imitate, then Rizal is a very viable choice. The
hero’s philosophies, life principles, convictions, thoughts, ideals, aspirations, and
dreams are a good influence to anyone. Throughout his life, he valued
nationalism and patriotism, respect for parents, love for siblings, and loyalty to
friends, and maintained a sense of chivalry. As a man of education, he highly
regarded academic excellence, logical and critical thinking, philosophical and
scientific inquiry, linguistic study, and cultural research. As a person, he
manifested versatility and flexibility while sustaining a strong sense of moral
uprightness.
People love fiction and are even willing to spend on books or movie tickets just
to be entertained by made-up tales. But only a few perhaps know that Rizal’s life
is full of fascinating non-fictional accounts.
For instance, it is rarely known that (1) Rizal was involved in a love triangle with
Antonio Luna as also part of the romantic equation; (2) Rizal was a model in
some of Juan Luna’s paintings; (3) Rizal’s common-law wife Josephine Bracken
was ‘remarried’ to a man from Cebu and had tutored former President Sergio
Osmeña; (4) Leonor Rivera (‘Maria Clara’), Rizal’s ‘true love’, had a son who
married the sister of the former President of the United Nations General Assembly
Carlos P. Romulo; (5) the Filipina beauty queen Gemma Cruz Araneta is a
descendant of Rizal’s sister, Maria; (6) the sportscaster Chino Trinidad is a
descendant of Rizal’s ‘first love’ (Segunda Katigbak); and (7) the original
manuscripts of Rizal’s novel (Noli and Fili) were once stolen for ransom, but
Alejandro Roces had retrieved them without paying even a single centavo.
Laws on Rizal
There are at least two Republic Acts and two Memorandum Orders pertaining to
Jose Rizal:
Republic Act N. 1425 or the Rizal Law
Republic Act No. 229 or the Celebration of Rizal Day’
Memorandum Order No. 247 by President Fidel V. Ramos
CHED Memorandum No. 3, s 1995 by Commissioner Mona D. Valismo.
Introduction about the Rizal Law
Republic Act 1425: Rizal Law was authored by Senator Claro M. Recto
It was signed by President Ramon Magsaysay on June 12, 1956 It requires
the implementation of the Rizal course as a requirement for graduation in all
non-degree and degree courses in the tertiary education
It includes the life, works, and writings of Jose Rizal, particularly his novels,
Noli Me Tangere and El Filibusterismo.
On August 16, 1956, the Rizal Law took effect
Explanation:
Rizal Day
Mangubat gave three reasons explaining why Rizal's death served as a turning
point to the nationalistic hopes of the countrymen: First is that it served as a
signal to the Katipunan to raise up arms against the Spaniards and begin the
revolution. It is important to note that it was not formed after the death of Rizal,
rather, the event at Bagumbayan on December 30 crystallized the motives of the
organization. Second, his execution also served as a realization to the elite that
they weren't an exemption to the despotism of the Spanish rule. Many other
sectors joined in the Katipunan as the revolutionary and nationalistic mind began
to settle on them. Lastly, because the event happened at the turn of the century,
it was also significantly considered as a "New Beginning" for the country.
Emilio Aguinaldo gave the first decree to declare December 30 as
"national day of mourning" and as anniversary of Jose Rizal's death. To observe
this, he ordered that all flags must be hoisted at halfmast on December 29 and
on the following day, there would be no government offices. The first ever
monument of Rizal erected was on Daet, Camarines Norte and its unveiling is
simultaneous to the first observance of Rizal Day on December 30, 1898 by the
Club Filipino. February 1, 1902, the Philippine Commission ordained Act no. 345
which issues December 30 as Rizal Day and as national holiday observed each
year.
According to Ambeth Ocampo, oftentimes, heroes are remembered more on their
deaths than their births. However, Mangubat mentions that the death of Rizal
would not have that been more meaningful were it not for birth and life spent for
the betterment of our country. There are many moves that wish to change the
date of Rizal Day to June 19 because it has a more positive sense and that it is
close to June 12 and May 28 which are the Philippine Independence Day and the
National Flag Day, respectively. On the other hand, December 30 is nearer to
the much more celebrated holidays of Christmas and New Year which often
overshadow the hero's celebration. For me personally, although his birth date is
a much more joyous celebration, his death can be a better perspective to look at
the entirety of Rizal's life and why he was willing to die for the sake of his love
for the country.
WHEREAS, Republic Act No. 1425 approved on June 12, 1956, directs all schools,
colleges and universities, public and private, to include in their curricula, courses
on the life, works and writings of
Jose Rizal, particularly his novels Noli Me Tangere and El Filibusterismo which
"are a constant and inspiring source of patriotism with which the minds of the
youth, especially during their formative and decisive years in school should be
suffused;"
WHEREAS, according to Dr. Rizal, "the school is the book in which is written the
future of the nation;"
WHEREAS, in 1996, the Filipino people will commemorate the centennial of Rizal’s
martyrdom and, two years thereafter, the centennial of the Declaration of
Philippine Independence; and
Within thirty (30) days from issuance hereof, the Secretary of Education, Culture
and Sports and the Chairman of the Commission on Higher Education are hereby
directed to jointly submit to the President of the Philippines a report on the steps
they have taken to implement this Memorandum Order, and one (1) year
thereafter, another report on the extent of compliance by both public and private
schools in all levels with the provisions of R.A. No. 1425.
DONE in the City of Manila, this 26th day of December in the year of Our Lord,
Nineteen Hundred and Ninety-Four.
CHED Memorandum
No.3,s. 1995 To:
Head of State Colleges and Universities
Head of Private Schools, Colleges and Universities
Office of the President Memorandum Order No. 247
Re: Implementation of Republic Act No. 1425
Enclosed is a copy of Memorandum Order No. 247 dated December
26, from the Office of the President of the Philippines entitled,
"Directing Secretary of Education, Culture and Sports and the CHAIRMAN OF
COMMISSION ON HIGHER EDUCATION to fully implement the Republic Act No.
1425 entitled "An Act to include in the curricula of all public and private
schools, colleges and universities, courses on the Life, Works and Writings of
Jose Rizal, particularly his novels, Noli Me Tangere and El Filibusterismo,
authorizing the printing and distribution thereof and for other purposes" for
guidance of all concerned. Strict compliance therewith is requested.
The essence of the life of Rizal is marked by the conditions that existed during
his lifetime in the Philippines and around the world particularly in Europe. Rizal
is the product of his era and his message sets forth as human declaration that
all human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights.
The 19th century stands out as an extremely dynamic and creative age especially
in Europe and the United States. During this period such concepts as
industrialism, democracy, and nationalism gained ascendancy and triggered
revolutionary changes in science, technology, economics, and politics. These
changes enabled man to achieve the heights of prosperity and dignity.
However, 19th century Philippines was largely medieval, although signs of
progress or change were noted in certain sectors. Its social and economic
structure was based on the old feudalistic patterns of abuse and exploitation of
the indio. Earlier, clamor for reforms had mentioned unheeded; social and
discontent caused confusion among the people.
SOCIAL STRUCTURE:
The Philippine society was predominantly feudalistic- the result of the Spanish
land holding system imposed upon the country with the arrival of the
conquistadores. An elite class exploited the masses, fostered by the “massive
slave” relationship between the Spaniards and the Filipinos. The Spaniards
exacted all forms of taxes and tributes, and drafted the natives for manual labor.
Consequently, the poor became poorer and the rich wealthier.
This shows the structure of the Philippine government and its function. Unluckily,
there were abuses of the officials in their power to hold public office. So, below
are the specified sources of abuses and sometimes corruption by the officials in
the administrative system.
The main cause of the administrative system was the appointment of officials
with inferior qualifications, and without dedication to duty, and moral strength to
resist corruption for material advancement.
These officials were given duties and powers and privileges.
Another is the Union of the Church and the State.
The principal officials of the Administrative system obtained their position by
royal appointment, while the rest of the position were either filled by the
governor general himself or were sold to the highest bidder.
POLITICAL SYSTEM:
Spain governed the Philippines through the Ministro de
Ultramar (Ministry of the Colonies) established in Madrid in 1863. This body
helped the Spanish monarch manage the affairs of the colonies and govern the
Philippines through a centralized machinery exercising: Executive
Legislative
Judicial and
Religious powers
The Governor General appointed by the Spanish monarch headed the central
administration in Manila, He was the king’s representative in all state and
religious matters and as such he exercised extensive powers. He issued executive
orders and proclamation and he had supervision and disciplinary powers over all
government officials. He was the commander in chief of the armed forces of the
Philippines. He had supreme authority in financial matters until 1784. He also
exercised legislative powers with his cumplase. CUMPLASE is the power of the
Governor-General to disregard or suspend a Royal decree if the condition in the
colony does not warrant it.By which he could disregard or suspend any law or
royal decree from Spain. An ex-officio president of the Royal Audiencia until
1861. He enjoyed religious duty gave him the prerogative to nominate priest to
ecclesiastical positions and control the finances of the missions.
Alcaldes Mayores
Civil Governors
Led the provincial government (alcaldias)
Alcaldes en ordinario
City mayor and vice mayor
Ruled the city government (ayuntamiento)
Gobernadorcillo
Town mayor
Ruled the town government (principalia)
Cabeza de Barangay
Barangay captain
Ruled the barrio
The Guardia Civil
Headed by alferez (Second lieutenant)
Performed police duties
Helped in the maintenance of peace and order
The system of courts was a centralized system
It was a pyramidical organization
Headed by the Royal Audiencia
Served as highest court for civil and criminal cases Together with the
Governor General, they made laws for the country called autos
acordados
The main cause of weakness of the administrative system was the appointment
of officials with inferior qualifications -without dedication to duty, no moral
strength to resist corruption. The kind of officials sent in the Philippines were
corrupt, abusive and unqualified officers. They were not equipped to any public
office. This was the reason why instead of focusing on their role as public officers
to form a good and well nation, they focused on getting wealth through
corruption. The worse thing was that, they became brutal and abusive to native
Filipinos to the extent that they executed most of our fellow native Filipinos who
fought and resisted against them.
There was also complication in the situation between the union of the church and
state. The priest or what we call the “Friars” also became powerful, cruel and
corrupt. FRIARS. The missionaries or the friars as they were known, played a
major role not only in propagating the Christian faith but also in the political,
social, economic and cultural aspects of the Filipinos. Aside from spreading the
word of God, they helped in pacifying the country.The checks adopted by Spain
to minimize abuses either proved ineffective or discouraged the officials
appointed by the King of Spain were ignorant of Philippine needs. This was the
reason behind their bad motives to our Philippine nation.
The most corrupt branch of government was the alcaldias. Dishonest and corrupt
officials often exacted more tributes than required by law and pocketed the
excess collections. They also monopolized provincial trade and controlled prices
and business practices. The parish priests could check this anomaly but in many
cases they encouraged the abuses in exchange for favors.
Participation in the government of the natives was confined to the lowest offices.
They participate only as gobernadorcillo of a town and cabeza de barangay of a
barrio. The position of gobernadorcillo was honorary entitled to two
pesos/month. The natural and constitutional rights and liberties of the indios
were curtailed. Homes were searched without warrants. People were convicted
and exiled for being filibusteros Books, magazines and other written materials
could not be published without the approval of the Board of Censors
Felipe Buencamino
In 1820, he led the petition criticizing the Dominican methods of instruction in
UST, clamored for better professors and demanded government control their
University thru anonymous letters.
One cannot fully understand Rizal’s thought without understanding the social and
political context of the 19th century. Social scientists marked the 19th century
as the birth of modern life as well as the birth of many nation-states around the
world. The birth of modernity was precipitated by three great revolutions around
the world: the Industrial revolution in England, the French Revolution in France
and the American Revolution. This will be discussed in module 3.
Apart from being known as an expert in the field of medicine, a poet, and
an essayist, Rizal exhibited other amazing talents. He knew how to paint, sketch,
and make sculptures. Because he lived in Europe for about 10 years, he also
became a polyglot – conversant in 22 languages. Aside from poetry and creative
writing, Rizal had varying degrees of expertise in architecture, sociology,
anthropology, fencing, martial arts, and economics to name a few.
Apart from being known as an expert in the field of medicine, a poet, and
an essayist, Rizal exhibited other amazing talents. He knew how to paint, sketch,
and make sculptures. Because he lived in Europe for about 10 years, he also
became a polyglot – conversant in 22 languages. Aside from poetry and creative
writing, Rizal had varying degrees of expertise in architecture, sociology,
anthropology, fencing, martial arts, and economics to name a few.
His novels awakened Philippine nationalism Rizal had been very vocal
against the Spanish government, but in a peaceful and progressive manner. For
him, “the pen was mightier than the sword.” And through his writings, he exposed
the corruption and wrongdoings of government officials as well as the Spanish
friars.
While in Barcelona,
Rizal contributed essays, poems,
allegories, and
editorials to the Spanish
newspaper, La Solidaridad. Most
of his writings, both in his essays
and editorials,
centered on individual rights and
freedom, specifically for
the Filipino people. As part of
his reforms, he even called for
the inclusion of the Philippines to
become a
province of Spain.
But, among his best works, two novels stood out from the rest – Noli Me
Tángere (Touch Me Not) and El Filibusterismo (The Reign of the Greed).
In both novels, Rizal harshly criticized the Spanish colonial rule in the
country and exposed the ills of Philippine society at the time. And because he
wrote about the injustices and brutalities of the Spaniards in the country, the
authorities banned Filipinos from reading the controversial books. Yet they were
not able to ban it completely. As more Filipinos read the books, their eyes opened
to the truth that they were suffering unspeakable abuses at the hands of the
friars. These two novels by Rizal, now considered his literary masterpieces, are
said to have indirectly sparked the Philippine
Revolution.
Upon his return to the Philippines, Rizal formed a progressive organization
called the La Liga Filipina. This civic movement advocated social reforms through
legal means. Now Rizal was considered even more of a threat by the Spanish
authorities (alongside his novels and essays), which ultimately led to his exile in
Dapitan in Northern Mindanao.
This however did not stop him from continuing his plans for reform. While
in Dapitan, Rizal built a school, hospital, and water system. He also taught
farming and worked on agricultural projects such as using abaca to make ropes.
Rizal was granted leave by then Governor-General Blanco, after
volunteering to travel to Cuba to serve as doctor to yellow fever victims. But at
that time, the Katipunan had a full-blown revolution and Rizal was accused of
being associated with the secret militant society. On his way to Cuba, he was
arrested in Barcelona and sent back to Manila to stand for trial before the court
martial. Rizal was charged with sedition, conspiracy, and rebellion – and
therefore, sentenced to death by firing squad.
Days before his execution, Rizal bid farewell to his
motherland and countrymen through one of his final letters, entitled
Mi último adiós or My Last Farewell. Dr. José Rizal was executed on
the morning of December 30, 1896, in what was then called
Bagumbayan (now referred to as Luneta). Upon hearing the command to
shoot him, he faced the squad and uttered in his final breath:
“Consummatumest” (It is finished). According to historical accounts, only
one bullet ended the life of the Filipino martyr and
hero.
His legacy lives on after his death, the Philippine Revolution
continued until 1898. And with the assistance of the United States,
the Philippines declared its independence from Spain on June 12,
1898. This was the time that the Philippine flag was waved at
General Emilio Aguinaldo’s residence in Kawit, Cavite.
Some Literary Pieces of Dr. Jose Rizal
To the Filipino Youth
Rizal wrote this literary poem when he was still studying at the University
of Sto. Tomas (UST). Originally written in Spanish (A la juventud filipina), Rizal
submitted this piece for a poem contest organized for Filipinos by the Manila
Lyceum of Art and Literature. At the age of 18, this work is beaming with strong
messages to convince readers, the youth in particular, that they are the hope of
the nation. He also stresses the importance of education to one’s future. Rizal
won the first prize and was rewarded with a feathershaped silver pen and a
diploma.
Hymn to labor
Jose Rizal’s patriotism is shown in this poem where he urges his fellowmen
to strive and work for their country whether in war or in peace. This poem was
originally written in Tagalog as Imno sa
Paggawa.
Noli Me Tángere
One of the most sought-after books in Philippine
literature until today, is Rizal’s famous novel titled Noli Me
Tángere (Touch Me Not). Driven by his undying love for his country, Rizal
wrote the novel to expose the ills of Philippine society during the Spanish
colonial era. At the time, the Spaniards prohibited the
Filipinos from reading the controversial book because of the unlawful acts
depicted in the novel. Yet they were not able to ban it completely and as
more Filipinos read the book, it opened their eyes to the truth that they
were being manhandled by the friars. In this revolutionary book, you’ll learn
the story of Crisostomo Ibarra, how
he dealt with Spanish authorities, and how he prepared for his
revenge, as told in Rizal’s second book, El Filibusterismo.
El Filibusterismo
This is Rizal’s sequel to his first book, Noli Me Tángere. In El
Filibusterismo (The Reign of the Greed), the novel exhibits a dark theme
(as opposed to the hopeful atmosphere in the first novel) in which it depicts
the country’s issues and how the protagonist
attempts a reform. The story takes place 13 years after Noli Me
Tángere, where revolutionary protagonist Crisostomo Ibarra is now under
the guise of Simoun – a wealthy jewelry tycoon. Because the novel also
portrays the abuse, corruption, and discrimination of the Spaniards towards
Filipinos, it was also banned in the country at the time. Rizal dedicated his
second novel to the GOMBURZA – the
Filipino priests named Mariano Gomez, Jose Apolonio Burgos, and
Jacinto Zamora who were executed on charges of subversion. The
two novels of Rizal, now considered as his literary masterpieces,
both indirectly sparked the Philippine Revolution.
The Birth of National Consciousness
Filipino Nationalism
Filipino Nationalism is an upsurge of patriotic sentiments and nationalistic
ideals in the Philippines of the 19th century that came consequently as a result
of more than two centuries of Spanish rule and as an immediate outcome of the
Filipino Propaganda Movement (mostly in Europe) from 1872 to 1892. It served
as the backbone of the first nationalist revolution in Asia, the Philippine
Revolution of 1896.
The opening of Manila (1834) and other parts of the Philippine to foreign
trade brought not only economic prosperity to the country but also a remarkable
transformation in the life of the Filipinos. As the people prospered, their standard
of living improved. They came into contact with foreign ideas and with travelers
from foreign lands. They read periodicals and books, including those brought in
from abroad. As a result, their mental horizons were broadened. They became
discontented with the old order of things and wanted social and political changes
that were in harmony with the freer spirit of the times.
Economic prosperity produced a new class of Filipinos–the
intelligentsia–educated, widely read, and enlightened individuals.
Many Filipinos had learned Spanish, and some knew other Western
languages such as French, English, and German. Boldly patriotic,
they discussed social and economic problems and advocated
reforms to remedy the evils of colonialism. Many of them sent their
children to colleges and universities not only in Manila but in Europe
too. From the intelligentsia came patriotic leaders who sowed the
seeds of Filipino nationalism. Among these were Father Pedro Pelaez, Father
Jose Burgos, Dr. Jose Rizal, Marcelo H. delPilar, the
Luna Brothers (Juan and Antonio), Jose ma. Panganiban, Mariano
Ponce, Graciano Lopez Jaena and Pedro A. Paterno.
Through the newly opened ports of the Philippines streamed liberal and
modern idea. These ideas were contained in books and periodicals brought in by
ships form Europe. These included ideas of freedom of the American and French
revolutions and enlightened thoughts of Montesquieu, Rousseau, Voltaire, Locke,
Jefferson, and other philosophers of freedom. The Filipinos began to wonder at
the deplorable situation in the Philippines. In their minds sprouted the aspirations
for reforms, justice, and liberty.
The opening of the Suez Canal which was built by Ferdinand de Lesseps to
world shipping on November 17, 1869, linked the Philippines closer to Europe. It
promoted the flow of ideas of freedom into the Philippines.
Opening of the Philippines to world trade from 1834 to 1873
This stimulated the economic activities in the country which brought
prosperity to some of the Filipinos but most of all to the Chinese and the
Spaniards. It resulted to the rise of a new social class referred to as “Middle
Class” or the “Illustrados”.
• Acquired material wealth
• Improved their social stature and influence
• Clamored for social and political equality with the colonial masters
NATIONALISM
According to Gellner, “nationalism” is not the awakening of nations to self-
consciousness: it invents nations where they do not exist. The drawback to this
formulation, however, is that Gellner is so anxious to show that nationalism
masquerades under false pretences that he assimilates “inventions” to
“fabrication” and falsity, rather than to “imagining” and creation.
RIZAL AND NATIONALISM
Acquiring a better understanding of Rizal’s life demands a deeper and more
profound analysis of his life and writings. His firm beliefs were the results of what
he had seen and experienced during his European days. Thus, to clear up vague
thoughts about him requires a glimpse into his past. Rizal was one of the elites
who demands changes in the Philippine government during the Spanish
colonization.
Together with his other ilustrado friends, Rizal voiced the
inclusion of Filipinos as representatives in the Cortes.
Filipinization in churches and equal rights were among the
requests made by Rizal to the Spanish government.
Rizal fought for equality with the Spaniards. Rizal and his
fellow ilustrados wanted to acquire the same education and
wealth as the Spanish students and families in the Philippines
have.
The dilemma that Rizal faced was depicted in his two famous novels, the
Noli and El Fili In Noli Me Tangere, Rizal was represented by both Elias and Ibarra.
In the chapter, “Voice of the Hunted,” Elias believed in the need
for radical reforms in the armed forces, priesthood, and
administrative justice system. While, Ibarra did not agree with the
reforms Elias wanted and believed in the power of the
authorities and the need for necessary evil.
In the chapter, “Elias’ Story,” Elias saw the need for an armed
struggle and resistance against the opposing forces
while Ibarra disagreed and believed that education was the key to make
the people liberated, so he encourages the building of schoolhouses to
educate those who are worthy of it.
In the chapter “Chase on the Lake,” Elias suddenly had a change
of heart; he believed in reforms while Ibarra became a
filibuster, initiating revolution. This change of heart in Ibarra
was a product of hardships and the desire to attain personal
vengeance
This trend of vagueness continued in the novel El Fili, were
Rizal was reflected in the characters of Simoun, Basilio, and
Padre Florentino.
In the conclusion of the El Fili, Rizal has implied his
resolution when in the story, he killed Simoun, the promoter
of revolution, and made Padre Florentino, an advocate of
peace.
In real life, Rizal reiterated his stand regarding this issue in his
December 15 Manifesto when he declared that he was against the
revolution, and he favored the reform programs,
especially regarding education.
In the process of making circumstances favorable for both, his appeal was
for reforms and education. What would liberate the people was the massive
movement of the natives united against the oppressors. When Rizal died, the
natives were able to push through their freedom with their strong nationalism
that had been heated up and strengthened by his artistic and realistic viewpoints
in his writings. He had influenced numerous natives to fight for independence.
The result of independence was very sweet for the Filipinos who fought
and died for it, and it was a regret feel that Rizal was not able to see that the
revolution that he did not favor was what liberated his people.
Nationalism usually springs from the consciousness of a national identity
of being one people. It is that all pervading spirit that binds together men of
diverse castes and creeds, clans and colors, and unites them into one people,
one family, one nation with common aspirations and ideals (Anderson, 1983)
IMAGINED COMMUNITY
An IMAGINED COMMUNITY is a concept developed
by Benedict Anderson in his 1983 book Imagined Communities, to
analyze nationalism. Anderson depicts a nation as a socially
constructed community, imagined by the people who perceive
themselves as part of that group.
NATION
NATION
“An imagined political community- and imagined as both inherently limited and
sovereign”.
(Benedict Anderson, Imagined Community) It is an anthropological spirit, then I
propose the following definition of the Nation: it is an imagined community-and
imagined as both inherently limited and sovereign.
“Imagined” means that we will never meet the majority of the community
members. It is imagined because members cannot all know each other. The
members of even the smallest nation will never know most their fellow-members,
meet them, or even hear of them. Yet in the minds of their lives the image of
their communion Nation as “limited” meaning that it co-exists with other nations
on the same plane. Also, because of finite boundaries.
“Sovereign” means that it is self-governing, not ruled by an outside power (as in
imperialism) or by a higher power (as in older religious world news.) It is
imagined as sovereign because the concept was born in an age in which
enlightenment and Revolution were destroying the legitimacy of the divinely-
ordained, hierarchical dynastic realm. It is imagined as sovereign because it is
not religious or monarchic.
Finally, it is imagined as a community because, regardless of the actual inequality
and exploitation that may prevail in each nation is always conceived as a deep,
horizontal comradeship.