Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 671 views

    Evaluation For Paut ASME 8 DIV 2

    Uploaded by

    Woodrow Fox
    The document evaluates a flaw according to ASME Section VIII criteria. It provides the results of evaluating Defect No. 1 which had dimensions of S=1, a=3, l=20, t=38. The defect was rejected because its a/t ratio of 0.079 exceeded the acceptance level in Table 7.10 according to the type of flaw being surface connected.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Evaluation For Paut ASME 8 DIV 2

    Uploaded by

    Woodrow Fox
    671 views3 pages
    The document evaluates a flaw according to ASME Section VIII criteria. It provides the results of evaluating Defect No. 1 which had dimensions of S=1, a=3, l=20, t=38. The defect was rejected because its a/t ratio of 0.079 exceeded the acceptance level in Table 7.10 according to the type of flaw being surface connected.

    Original Title

    Evaluation for Paut ASME 8 DIV 2

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document evaluates a flaw according to ASME Section VIII criteria. It provides the results of evaluating Defect No. 1 which had dimensions of S=1, a=3, l=20, t=38. The defect was rejected because its a/t ratio of 0.079 exceeded the acceptance level in Table 7.10 according to the type of flaw being surface connected.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    671 views3 pages

    Evaluation For Paut ASME 8 DIV 2

    Uploaded by

    Woodrow Fox
    The document evaluates a flaw according to ASME Section VIII criteria. It provides the results of evaluating Defect No. 1 which had dimensions of S=1, a=3, l=20, t=38. The defect was rejected because its a/t ratio of 0.079 exceeded the acceptance level in Table 7.10 according to the type of flaw being surface connected.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 3

    EVALUATION FUNCTION FOR FLAW PAUT

    We evaluation flaw in according with ASME Section VIII, Divison 2 Code-Table 7.10 & figure 7.11

    Result
    Defect No. S a l t a/l a/t ACC/REJ

    1 1 3 20 38 0.1 0.079 REJ

    FIGURE 7.11

    * If S<= a, Surface Indication *If S>a, subsurface Indication


    (May or may not surface connnected) (Never Connect to surface)
    T
    .10 & figure 7.11
    TABLE 7.10

    Thickness Between 25 mm and


    Type of Defect less than or equal to 300 mm

    Flaw
    SURFACE Aspec Ratio SURFACE SUBSURFACE a/t ACC Level
    a/l a/t a/t 0.036
    0.00 0.031 0.034
    0.05 0.033 0.038
    0.10 0.036 0.043
    0.15 0.041 0.054
    0.20 0.047 0.066
    0.25 0.055 0.078
    0.30 0.064 0.09
    0.35 0.074 0.13
    0.40 0.083 0.116
    0.45 0.085 0.129
    0.50 0.087 0.143

    You might also like