This document discusses the history of social order and caste system in Kerala, India. It traces the origins of the caste system to the Aryan invasion of India around 1400 BCE, where the Aryans conquered and enslaved the indigenous Dravidian people. Over time, the caste system became further entrenched in society through texts like the Manusmriti that justified social stratification. In the late 19th/early 20th century, social reform movements in Kerala challenged the caste system and fought for equal rights and social progress, influenced by leaders like Sree Narayana Guru and early communist ideals. The first communist government of Kerala implemented many of these reforms.
This document discusses the history of social order and caste system in Kerala, India. It traces the origins of the caste system to the Aryan invasion of India around 1400 BCE, where the Aryans conquered and enslaved the indigenous Dravidian people. Over time, the caste system became further entrenched in society through texts like the Manusmriti that justified social stratification. In the late 19th/early 20th century, social reform movements in Kerala challenged the caste system and fought for equal rights and social progress, influenced by leaders like Sree Narayana Guru and early communist ideals. The first communist government of Kerala implemented many of these reforms.
Original Description:
Helpful to students who wants to study manusmriti and subaltern studies
This document discusses the history of social order and caste system in Kerala, India. It traces the origins of the caste system to the Aryan invasion of India around 1400 BCE, where the Aryans conquered and enslaved the indigenous Dravidian people. Over time, the caste system became further entrenched in society through texts like the Manusmriti that justified social stratification. In the late 19th/early 20th century, social reform movements in Kerala challenged the caste system and fought for equal rights and social progress, influenced by leaders like Sree Narayana Guru and early communist ideals. The first communist government of Kerala implemented many of these reforms.
This document discusses the history of social order and caste system in Kerala, India. It traces the origins of the caste system to the Aryan invasion of India around 1400 BCE, where the Aryans conquered and enslaved the indigenous Dravidian people. Over time, the caste system became further entrenched in society through texts like the Manusmriti that justified social stratification. In the late 19th/early 20th century, social reform movements in Kerala challenged the caste system and fought for equal rights and social progress, influenced by leaders like Sree Narayana Guru and early communist ideals. The first communist government of Kerala implemented many of these reforms.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 13
Manusmriti and Subaltern Politics
Reforms and resistence in Kerala
“Amedya Sava Chandaala | Madhya Maamsaathi Dooshitha||
The history of politics and order traces back to the beginning
of organised society. India, where the first civilisation in South Asia existed , the country with the largest written constitution, has immense history in legal studies and political thought. The Indian Political thought was drowned in the eurocentric world eventhough many of the texts found in Indian Political thought precedes European ones The history of legal texts in India is not complete without referring ancient hindu law books among them Manu Dharma Shastra which is believed to be the first legal and constitutional work in Ancient India is having immense importance . Manu Dharma sasthra otherwise known as Manu Smriti considered as the authoritative philosophical guide for the With 2,694 stanzas and 12 chapters it discuss about dharmas of each set of varnas. The immense significance of manusmriti lies on it’s comprehensive character. For establishing a social order Manu used norms of religion ,economics , moral principles apart from legal provision. He used these principles to provide a consistent justification for social theory. Manu as a law maker tried to prescribe code of social conduct to enforce as a social structure which was based on the authority of veda and tradition. For manu world is the creation of a self born (Swayambhu) Brahman and after creating the world he also made certain code of conduct which Manu justifies with his law code. It’s influence on all aspects of hindu thought, particularly the justification of the cast system has been profound “Adhyapanam Adhyayanam yajanam yaachanam thatha| Dhaanam prathigraham cha eva brahmanaanam akalpayath || To Brahmanas he assigned teaching and studying (veda), Sacrificing for their own benefit and for others giving and accepting (of Alms) Prajaanaam Rakshanam dhaanam ijya adhyayanam eva cha | Visheyeshva aprasakthish cha Kshatriyasya samasathaha || The Kshetriya he commanded to protect the people, to bestow gifts , to offer sacrifices , to study ( the vedas) , and to abstain from attatching himself to sensual pleasures Pashoonaam rakshanam dhaanam ijya adhyayanam eva cha| Vaanikpadham kuseedham cha vaishasya krisheem eva cha || The Vaishya to tend cattle , to bestow gifts , to offer sacrifices , to study (Veda), to trade , to lend money , and to cultivate land Ekam Eva tu shoodrasya prabhu karmam Samaadishath Ethesham eva varnaanaam shushurushaam anasooyaya|| One occupation only the lord prescribed to the Sudra ,to serve meekly even these other three varnas Eventhough India was the centre of Oreintal political thought but the inception of modern study of Ancient Indian social order traces back to the efforts made by the British East India company, as a colonial power they couldn’t govern a society which is far backward than Europe because of the lack of enlightenment, they had to study the history of the institutions and social order. What they wanted was a smooth governance of the country,so they had to accomodate the institutions and practices for establishing strong territorial establishment in Bengal and also for commercial purposes. It is evident in preface of A code of Gentoo Laws. The british went on making efforts to eradicate the primary contradiction between them and people. It acted like a lubricant to avoid friction between the modern european enlightened society and outdated Indian society but at the end of the day it was for the benefit of British interests. According to Sir William John’s preface of translation of Manu smriti adds that policy like this can largely add to the wealth of Britain. Based on this the most comprehensive early work on Indian institution was born, Colebrook’s essay on on the “Enumeration of Indian classes”. For Colebrook it was one of the distinguishing factor of Indian society. Following Colebrook’s path Mill tried to describe the caste system in History of India. From this moment onwards the social subordination became a topic of debate and the came to the conclusion that vices of caste subordination had a destructive side among hinduism and continued to practice at that time. Coming back to the topic Kerala , one of the socially progressed state in India, was also subjected to the traditional caste system of India. People belongs to the lower strata of the society, that is the people from lower caste was deprived of social, political,economical rights, as it was forbidden for them since the emergence of caste system in deep south of India. The long history of oppression provided soil for the social reform movements which was a reflection of what happened around all over the country. the latter part of 19th century and early 20th century were the period of social enlightenment and reforms in Kerala. Charismatic leaders and ideologies and modern outlook of society were started to penetrate into the minds of the deprived classes. The spark of enlightenment which was carried out by the charismatic leaders like Sree Narayana Guru, the early communist leaders of Kerala had the potentiality to ignite into wild fire. This lead to the introduction of radical thought among the people and they rushed like a swarm of bees and rallied around for getting the legitimate position in the society, the notion of progressiveness gave them the courage to question the vedic practises and for them equality was the first thing that all must get and without equality there was no liberty. The catalysts of social reform movements were able to put an effort to erase the secondary contradiction (which was proposed by the Marxists) existed in the society and most of their aspirations and goals were implemented by the first communist party government of Kerala,this is where we could see the influence of Marxism in questioning tradtional vedic practises and Manusmriti. This is where Kerala is different from the other parts of the country, they were able to deal with the secondary contradicitions which is the soul oppressive factor of the country, it is through these social reforms Kerala was able to attain comparatively a higher social security and progress. All the provisions brought for the betterment of the society had blood and sweat of millions of people who fought against the vedic caste system.
An overview of history of social order in Kerala
The Keralite society was a part of ancient Dravidian culture, which is considered as one of the least explored culture in India. The prehistoric India was inhabited by negritos later added to by the Proto Austroloids then by Dravidians and Mongloids then finally vedic aryans,who are racially considered Nordics. The proto Austroloids came from Palestine. The kadars,irulas Jarawas of Deccan and andaman hills are today’s representatives of the Negritos. The Mundas , Santhals, kols and Bhils of central India hills represent the Austroloids. The Mongloid family is represented by North Eastern hill tribes. The largest and the most populous race that occupied the entire prehistoric India,barring the north east was the Dravidians who extended from Sindh to Cheranadu (present day Kerala). Munshi, Nehru, Nigam, sagar and others point to the advanced Dravidian civilization, language and culture in Northern India The vedic Aryans migrated from Eranvej(the present Russian Turkestan) via Iran and Afghanistan into Punjab around 1400 BCE and exterminated or enslaved Dravidians and other inhabitants, it was evident in the report of Sir Robert Eric Mortimer Wheeler, he was observing a skull which was obtained from the Harappan excavation site. There was a knife pierced in the skull and when he observed it closely there was the symbol of Puranthaka (Indra) who is the supreme god of Aryans. The rig veda gives the chronicle of this conquest. These aryans are related to the Acheans and Dorians and the racial stock of German north of Europe Many authorities on the Indus valley Civilization point out the black Dravidians were exterminated by the aryans. Those who were not killed were made as slaves. The stratification by colour of the conquered race marks the first step in the development of Indian caste system. According to Zend Avestha, the pre vedic Aryan in Iran had a formof three fold clan division , divided by occupation. This was similar to the clan and trade guild groupings in any other civilization around the world, and must not be confused with caste gradation in India The foundation of caste gradation in India was the division of the conquered slave(Dasa) race from Aryan race, the black Dravidians(slave castes)were called Dasa Varna and the conqureors Arya varna. These terms are used in all contemporary Aryan scriptures( as pointed out by scholars like B.R Ambedkar). This division and degradation of the Indian slave from his aryan master is similar to that of Hebrews from Egyptians, serfs of Germany etc. The uniqueness of Indian Slavery was the divine seal on slavery. This was not challenged for 3 millenia. When the slave trade was and slave system was abolished in India by Slavery Abolition Act of 1843 there were about 20 million slaves. In Kerala the state of travancore itself had about 200,000 slaves.. Aryan invasion, subsequent Sankritisation process ( the term was coined by one of the pioneers of Sociology in India Professor Mysore Narasimhachar Srinivas) and with the legitimacy of Manusmriti the element of caste came to the stage of the most flourished culture in India. The practice of untouchability was also legitimized by it’s claimed existence in South India even during the ancient period. The untouchables or Dalits have a long history of their origin in South India. On the basis of Ambedkar’s thesis of the untouchability, 4th century A.D witnessed the evolution of untouchability in south Indian society. (The deep you go to the history of Kerala or Dravidian culture you could understand how aryan culture penetrated and transformed the society.) Slavery was a deep rooted social evil existed in Kerala.It was institutionalized in Tamilnadu and other parts of South Indian society during the period of Raja Raja 1( 985 A.D to 1016 A.D), the Chola ruler . In Kerala , Pulayas, Parayas, Kuravas, Vedas, Nayadis were the important untouchables castes and they were denied all kind of fundamental rights. There were many slave castes in kerala and they were owned and sold like any commodity by their masters. We can relate this to Karl Marx’s theory of commodification of labour. Slavery was a heriditery system in kerala like all the other parts of the country and the caste immobility made them not to upgrade themselves to higher strata. The system of slavery had close connections with the caste system. It is evident in the different manuscripts, inscriptions, foreign records etc. One of the earliest record on slavery were found in the inscription of 849 AD. It was related to the privileges given to Tarisa church at Quilon the present day Kollam and it also mentions about the prices of slaves. The term adima was repeatedly used in ancient malayalam texts. The system of control and ownership of adimas was with the upper class people. The untouchable class which was later referred as Dalits were relegated to the status of adimas and had to perform arduos physical labour in agriculture. Untouchable slaves were part and parcel of the agricultural field they were born into. The concept of Purity and pollution played a crucial role in maintaining the social distance between different castes. The pollution distance varied from caste to caste and place to place. The hierarchy of caste was decided according to degree of purity and pollution. In Kerala , the concept of pollution was refined to unique complexity and was capable of being transmitted, but from a distance. It was practiced in a 3 way manner- untouchability , unapproachability, unseeability(practised especially in Travancore). The first one as the word suggests was practised to prevent touch from another person and second one was for keeping a certain distance from lower caste people and the final one swept away lower caste from interacting with mainstream society, it was used by the upper caste people to sweep away lower class people from public roads. Another interesting factor about caste system in Kerala was the lower caste also practised pollution among themselves . The different castes of slaves always kept a distance from themselves and never practised exogamy and didn’t even tried to organize at first. This elaborate and almost perfect system of keeping man away from man and caste away from caste prevented the birth of any kind of solidarity among slave castes One of the demonic factor that existed in the society of Kerala was the discriminative legal system which ensured the maintenance of upper class hegemony. Law of justice which meant to be the instrument of actuating justice in the society closed it’s eyes towards the lower class people. It is evident in the different punishments given to upper caste people and lower caste people for the same offense. The severity of punishments which is prescribed in the legal system varied from caste to caste. For example the untouchables had to put their hand inside a pot which is filled with poisonous snakes. If the snake didn’t bite him/her then they will be proved not guilty another example is the slave castes were forced to lick a red hot sword if it didn’t burn then he or she is not guilty. But coming to the case of Brahmin community of Kerala , the intensity of the punishment was very low, for example if they commited a crime it will be written on a manuscript and the authorities will put it in one side of a weighing machine and the accused Brahmin will sit in the other side of weighing machine, if the manuscript found to be heavy then he is guilty,but that won’t happen. That much discriminative the system was. Even the court of justice which followed the principle of lady of justice which symbolizes fair and equal administration of law without corruption,favour,greed or prejudice was blindfolded with dark veil of casteism. The lower caste people had to shout from appointed distance and take his chance of being heard and receiving attention. So there was no chance for getting justice for lower class people. In short we can say that the ruling class the savarna class monopolized resources,social status and power while the enslaved castes were having life of deprivation and marginalization. As manusmriti says their life was dedicated to serve the upper class.
The dominant class of Kerala and their
superiority As Manusmriti says Brahmins were in the top most position of the varna system in Kerala too. Brahmins in Kerala was known as Nambudiris had the ritual superiority, they drew their power from Manusmriti and their ritual superiority gave them authoritative power in all spheres (Economically, politically and socially). They were considered as holy people and representative of god and they possesed the sole right to for interpreting sacred laws and rituals. For the king it was mandatory to serve the Brahmins and with the state’s funding they gave gifts and food which is free of cost to Brahmins. Brahmin seva was considered as one of the most pure thing and feeding them was like a sacred duty for the kings. Originally Brahmins were the ruling class people of Kerala. They were in power from 11th to 16th century. This seems like a contradicition as Kshatriyas were the people who are entitled to ruling power according to Manusmriti. Brahmins soon became powerful land owners after feudal lords divided land among their close allies and it sealed their dominance. As education was limited to them naturally Brahmins excelled in arts , literature, culture science and medicine Next to Brahmins there was Nairs. They were the martial class of Kerala ( The Nair brigade later became 9th battalion Madras regiment). They excelled in the art of warfare and had a respectable position in the society( but in many earlier texts they were referred as Sudras). Their relation with Brahmins increased their influence and it helped them to be the custodian of Brahmin’s property. Their primary role was to protect the land and people and they also had to raise army for the king at the time of war. Technically Brahmins were the owners of land but the power of control was with the nair community. At many points of time in history nairs took the power of ownership from brahmins. While talking about Nairs we can’t go forward without mentioning their family system, which was very unique in the Indian society, their system was known as Marumakkathayam which is a matrilineal system of inheritence where female line determined the descent of a family ( But practically the family system was patriarchal). As mentioned before Nairs were martial class and were seen as saviours they totally became a protector in all sense.
The Vanquished classes
After the Brahmins, Kshatriyas and Nairs it was Ezhavas and nadars. Ezhavas are the most widespread caste in Kerala(even now). They were spread all over Kerala, in Travancore, Cochin and Malabar which was coming under Madras presidency. They had no fixed occupation- they used to do agriculture , weaving, coir making etc. A few of them engaged in business, trade and many of them practised medicine too. And ezhavas were one of the castes which practised sanskritisation according to Mysore Narasimhachar Srinivas. But even though they were in majority ezhavas considered as lower caste,but one interesting fact about Ezhavas is though they were in the lower strata of caste system they were not untouchables and was above outcastes. Subsequently the master class imposed many restrictions on them. They were not allowed to use public facilities, they were restrained from taking formal education, their women could not cover their breasts. Just like other lower castes they were not allowed to enter into temple moreover they were not able to use the roads that surrounds a temple( The vaikkom satygraha was a movement against this). They were forced to render free service to government and with different public controls and restraints the upper caste people were able to silence them. Next to them were the nadars. Nadars can be found in Kerala and Tamilnadu. A large proportion of their population was concentrated in Travancore ( An Intersting piece of information about them is you can see Nadars in the all 3 most important religions of Kerala that is Hinduism, Christianity and Islam). They were also placed in lower caste strata but was above untouchables. But they were the victims of cruel oppression. The most horrendous fact about them was they were subjcted to severe social as well as economic oppression. Oppressive taxes were collected through oppressive methods from them, they even had to pay taxes for deceased memebrs of their family.