Sample of Raw Data For Analysis

Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 12

Factor 1: Community Relations

Respondents Sex Age Educ.Attain. Indicator 1 Indicator 2 Indicator 3


1 2 1 3 2 3 5
2 2 2 1 3 4 3
3 1 3 2 3 3 4
4 2 3 2 2 2 4
5 1 4 4 4 4 4
6 1 2 4 5 5 5
7 2 3 2 4 5 5
8 2 4 3 4 4 4
9 1 5 1 5 2 3
10 2 5 1 4 4 4

Sex: %
1 - Male 4 40
2 - Female 6 60

Age: %
1 - 18 - below 1 10
2 - 19 - 24 years old 2 20
3- 25 - 30 years old 3 30
4 - 31 - 36 years 2 20
5 - 37 - above 2 20

Educational Attainment: %
1- Elem. Level 3 30
2 - Elem Graduate 3 30
3 - HS Level 2 20
4 - HS Graduate 2 20

Scale/Interpretation
1 - Strongly Disagree 0 0 0
2 -Disagree 2 2 0
3 - Neither Agree or Dis. 2 2 2
4 - Agree 4 4 5
5 - Strongly Disagree 2 2 3
ommunity Relations Factor 2: Training and Seminars
Indicator 4 Indicator 5 Indicator 1 Indicator 2 Indicator 3 Indicator 4 Indicator 5
5 4 4 4 4 4 5
3 3 3 4 4 3 3
4 5 4 4 4 4 4
3 3 5 5 5 3 2
3 4 4 4 4 5 3
4 3 3 4 3 3 3
3 4 4 4 3 3 4
4 4 5 5 3 2 3
3 3 4 4 4 4 5
4 4 4 4 4 4 4

0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 1 1
5 4 2 0 3 4 4
4 5 6 8 6 4 3
1 1 2 2 1 1 2
FACTOR 1: COMMUNITY RELATION
Indicators/Statements SD D N A SA Total Mean/Avg.
The community is helpful. 0 2 2 4 2 10 3.60
The community is well-informed. 0 2 2 4 2 10 3.60
Indicator 3 0 0 2 5 3 10 4.10
Indicator 4 0 0 5 4 1 10 3.60
Indicator 5 0 0 4 5 1 10 3.70

Scale/Interpretation Range Interval


1 - Strongly Disagree 1.00 - 1.80
2 - Disagree 1.81 - 2.61
3 - Neither Agree or Dis. 2.62 - 3.42
4 - Agree 3.43 - 4.23
5 - Strongly Agree 4.24 - 5.00
Standard Deviation Interpretation
3.22 Agree
3.22 Agree
3.63 Agree
3.13 Agree
3.22 Agree
FACTOR 2: TRAINING AND SEMINARS
Table #3: Relationship between Sex and Community Relation

Respondents Sex Mean/Avg. Pearson r value:


1 2 0.76 -0.57
2 2 0.64
3 1 0.76
4 2 0.4
5 1 0.76
6 1 0.88
7 2 0.84
8 2 0.8
9 1 0.64
10 2 0.8
Table #4: Relationship between Age and Community Relation

Respondents Mean/Avg
Age of the Indicators.
1 3 0.76 -0.052228
2 3 0.64
3 3 0.76
4 3 0.56
5 3 0.76
6 3 0.88
7 3 0.84
8 4 0.8
9 5 0.64
10 5 0.8
Effectiveness of Barangay Tanod in Crime Prevention

Indicators Community Relation Training and Seminar Factor 3


1 3.60 3.43 4.00
2 3.60 4.23 5.00
3 4.10 3.90 3.88
4 3.60 2.89 3.88
5 3.70 3.98 3.23
Total: 18.60 18.43 19.99
Overall Mean of Each Factor: 3.72 3.69 4.00
Overall Interpretation for Each Factor: Agree Agree Agree
Factor 4 Crime Prevention
2.77 3.45
2.89 3.93
4.33 4.05
4.88 3.81
3.76 3.67
18.63
3.73 Overall Mean 3.78
Agree Agree
Effective
Table 1: Respondents' Profile Based on Sex Table 2: Respondents' Profile Based on Education

Sex Frequency Percentage Education Frequency Percentage


Male 4 40% Elem Level
Female 6 60% Elem Grad
HS Level
HS Grad

You might also like