WK 5 Russell Hart
WK 5 Russell Hart
WK 5 Russell Hart
Russell Hart
University of Phoenix
CJA/446
John Hullar
2/15/2022
2
Mass Incarceration can be defined as “the entire regime of managing social crisis by
means of police, courts, and prisons. This means social management using violence,
implemented throughout the years (Kurti, 2018). Mass Incarceration is not only being seen in
prisons but also in Jails. New York City is a great example of this. Now there has been a call for
some reforming of these policies by people from all walks of life. This includes judges, nonprofit
originations, and mental health providers. There have been serval different ideas proposed on
how to do this.
As time has changed, so has the industry standards tend to change. What were once
acceptable standards or practices are no longer accepted. Mass Incarceration at one point and
time was the industry standard if the street were safe. Mass Incarceration started particularly due
to the War on Drugs, but it somehow spiraled out of control due to other policies and law reform.
The industry now requires being proactive to crime instead of being reactive. This approach
requires that you police each crime-driven area according to its needs. With this information, an
extensive evaluation will have to be created. The data collected will have to be carefully
The industry is now requesting a more personalized or tailored criminal justice reform
instead of generalized plans that may have shown effective in some areas but not all. These
standards require more of an indebt look at the data gathered rather than just a surface or
generalized approach. The indebt evaluation seeks to contact offenders with resources that better
3
fit their needs. The only way that this can be done is by an indebt study that studies more than
just offenses of the offenders. An indebt study of the offender’s lifestyle in and out of prison
must be completed. This will evaluation will also help shed light on ways the offenders entered
the Criminal Justice System. This information will aid in helping deter others from committing
crimes.
The first part of the evaluation will take a look at offenders’ current crimes. These can be
broken down into serval different categories such as drugs, family violence, violence,
prostitution, and violation of probation crimes. For repeat offenders, efforts should be made to
determine what most likely leads to being rearrested. The offender’s living situation should also
be identified. The location of the offender should also be noted. The next thing the evaluation
will seek is to evaluate the history of the offenders. The history means how many crimes the
offender has been arrested for, how many crimes the offender has been convicted of, and
whether he has committed the same crimes over again. The evaluation will also look at if any
social services have been provided. These include housing aid, food stamps, mental health
services, and other services that may be offered in the community. The offender’s language will
also need to be known in order to make sure they get the help in their first language. It will also
be important to identify if acts of violence have ever been committed towards offenders. The
survey will also seek to understand the offender’s family dynamics upon release from
incarceration. If the offender doesn’t have a family some kind of support system post-
incarceration will need to be identified. These new industry standards require a more holistic
The data should be interpreted and analyzed both individually and together with different
categories put together. The data should be reviewed based on geographical location. This helps
identify the specific help that a geographical area. It is very important because one area may
have drug problems, whereas another area has issues with gangs. These two areas will require
different help. The data should analyze when offenders first encountered violence, whether it be
them committing the crime or them being a victim of crime. The current crimes should also be
analyzed to determine if there were underline circumstances for the offender to commit the
crime. For example, if someone is arrested for stealing but they are homeless this will need to be
noted in an effort to help identify resources that may help the offender upon release. Interpreting
the data correctly is very important because this will determine the resources provided to a
geographical area.
The data seeks to understand what community factors lead an offender to commit a crime
and to determine the proper resources an area will need. The evaluation will provide a large
amount of data. This data will be used to determine the resources needed in the community. Any
area scoring over fifty percent will indicate that the community needs help in these areas. The
different areas include but are not limited to drugs problems, housing assistance, vocational
assistance, and more. The data will measure what lead the offenders to commit a crime will help
create programs to prevent crimes. If the score in this section is over forty percent, programs will
be put into place in an effort to prevent and deter crime in areas. This data will also be looked at
“The distinction between prearrest and post-arrest interventions, which the commission
downplays, is important for understanding how these suggestions would actually be implemented
(Kurti, 2018). Industry standards are now calling for community-based crime prevention efforts.
The industry also suggests not just focusing on adults but also juveniles. Mass Incarceration can
be tackled on three different fronts. These programs are Enhanced Probation, Justice Hubs, and
department take more than just fees seriously. The industry is now requesting that jobs, housing,
and other social services be taken seriously. If offenders are found to be lacking in this area
proper resources should be provided to the offender in this area. Justice Hubs is suggested to be
an area for civic unity. These areas will allow for areas to house the community-based resources.
These policies and programs should evaluate to determine if there is a different need in
the community. As the programs progress, there may be a need for more programs, or some
programs may need to be taken away. The programs implemented should be evaluated every five
years. You don’t want to evaluate the program too often because you have the program’s time to
work.
Conclusion
The industry is now calling on everyone to stop mass incarceration. An evaluation can be
completed to determine the resources needed in the community to prevent mass incarceration.
The programs implemented in the community will be unique to specific geographical areas.
6
These programs will need to be evaluated every five years to determine the impacts of the
community resources.
7
References
Kurti, Zhandarka, and Jarrod Shanahan. 2018. “Rebranding Mass Incarceration: The Lippman
Commission and Carceral Devolution in New York City.” Social Justice 45 (2/3): 25–49.
https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?
direct=true&AuthType=shib&db=i3h&AN=137039924&site=ehost-live&scope=site.