Challenging PDGM Coding Scenarios

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 41

6/3/2021

June 4, 2021

Challenging PDGM 
Coding Scenarios

Presenter: Sharon M. Litwin RN, BSHS, MHA, HCS-D

HPS Alliance Members Only 
Home Health Webinar Series ‐ 2021
1

PDGM & Coding
As a result of the implementation of PDGM, we have moved into a new era of 
reimbursement 

Two of the five PDGM subgroups are directly related to coding.

As we move forward, let's take a deep breath, review what we already 
know, and develop a plan to effectively navigate complex coding 
scenarios...

1
6/3/2021

Objectives

UNDERSTAND COMPLEX INTAKE AND  REVIEW INTAKE AND CODING  DISCUSS ACTION PLANS/BEST 


CODING ISSUES SEEN UNDER PDGM SCENARIOS AND CASE STUDIES PRACTICES

Coding Conventions & Guidelines
•Coding Conventions and Guidelines Have not changed
•Follow the conventions and guidelines
•First step in accurate coding

2
6/3/2021

Intake
•Intake process –
• Need to ensure that No Unacceptable Diagnoses (PDGM) go through to 
admission
• Review F2F documentation 
• Needs to support primary diagnosis
• Query the physician if additional diagnosis information is needed
•Provide physician/referral source education regarding PDGM
•Informed source will be more willing to provide needed
information

Coding Process
•Code to what the physician documents
•Be sure you have documentation or confirmation from the
physician of a diagnosis before assigning that diagnosis
•Query the physician if additional diagnosis information is
needed
•Code to the comprehensive OASIS assessment, once confirmed with 
physician
•The comprehensive assessment and plan of care must support the 
diagnoses
6

3
6/3/2021

Diagnoses in PDGM
•Primary diagnosis, the primary reason for home health 
services, determines the Clinical Group
•The clinical group represents the primary reason for home health 
services during a 30‐day period of care
◦ 12 Clinical Groups
•Comorbidity Adjustment
◦ From Secondary Diagnoses reported on the claim (up to 24 allowed)
• None, Low, or High

PDGM Clinical Groups


CLINICAL GROUP PRIMARY REASON FOR HOME HEALTH ENCOUNTER IS TO PROVIDE:

Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation Therapy (PT/OT/SLP) for a musculoskeletal condition

Neuro/Stroke Rehabilitation Therapy (PT/OT/SLP) for a neurological condition or stroke

Wounds - Post-Op Wound Aftercare and Skin/


Assessment, treatment and evaluation of a surgical wound(s); assessment, treatment and evaluation of non-surgical wounds, ulcers burns and other lesions
Non-Surgical Wound Care

Behavioral Health Care Assessment, treatment and evaluation of psychiatric and substance abuse conditions

Complex Nursing Interventions Assessment, treatment and evaluation of complex medical and surgical conditions including IV, TPN, enteral, nutrition, ventilator, and ostomies

Medication Management, Teaching and Assessment (MMTA)

MMTA –Surgical Aftercare Assessment, evaluation, teaching, and medication management for Surgical Aftercare

MMTA – Cardiac/Circulatory Assessment, evaluation, teaching, and medication management for Cardiac or other circulatory related conditions

MMTA – Endocrine Assessment, evaluation, teaching, and medication management for Endocrine related conditions

MMTA – GI/GU Assessment, evaluation, teaching, and medication management for Gastrointestinal or Genitourinary related condition

MMTA – Infectious Disease/Neoplasms/ Blood-


Assessment, evaluation, teaching, and medication management for conditions related to Infectious diseases/Neoplasms/ Blood-forming Diseases
forming Diseases

MMTA –Respiratory Assessment, evaluation, teaching, and medication management for Respiratory related conditions

MMTA – Other Assessment, evaluation, teaching, and medication management for a variety of medical and surgical conditions not classified in one of the previously listed groups

Reference: Federal Register/Vol. 84, No. 138/Thursday, July 18, 2019/Proposed Rules
8

4
6/3/2021

PDGM -Low Comorbidity Adjustment Subgroups


Comorbidity Subgroup Description for Low Comorbidity Subgroups
Cerebral 4 Includes sequelae of cerebral vascular diseases
Circulatory 4 Include hypertensive chronic kidney disease

Circulatory 9 Includes acute and chronic embolisms and thrombosis

Circulatory 10 Includes varicose veins with ulceration


Endocrine 2 Diabetes due to a Known Underlying Condition
Heart 11 Includes heart failure
Neoplasms 1 Includes oral cancers
Neuro 5 Includes Parkinson's disease
Neuro 7 Includes hemiplegia, paraplegia, and quadriplegia
Neuro 10 Includes peripheral and polyneuropathies

Respiratory 10 Includes respiratory disease

Skin 1 Includes cutaneous abscess, cellulitis, lymphangitis


Skin 3 Includes diseases of arteries, arterioles, & capillaries with ulceration & non-pressure, chronic
ulcers
Skin 4 Includes Stages Two through Four and Unstageable pressure ulcers
9

PDGM - High Comorbidity Adjustment Interaction Subgroups


Comorbidity
Comorbidity Comorbidity
Subgroup Description Description
Subgroup Subgroup
Interaction
Behavioral 2 Includes diseases of arteries, arterioles, and capillaries with ulceration and non-
1 Includes depression and bipolar disorder Skin 3
pressure, chronic ulcers
Cerebral 4 Includes sequelae of cerebral vascular
2 Circulatory 4 Includes hypertensive chronic kidney disease
diseases
Cerebral 4 Includes sequelae of cerebral vascular
3 Heart 10 Includes cardiac dysrhythmias
diseases
Cerebral 4 Includes sequelae of cerebral vascular
4 Heart 11 Includes heart failure
diseases
Cerebral 4 Includes sequelae of cerebral vascular
5 Neuro 10 Includes peripheral and polyneuropathies
diseases
Includes hypertensive chronic kidney
6 Circulatory 4 Skin 1 Includes cutaneous abscess, cellulitis, lymphangitis
disease
Circulatory 4 Includes hypertensive chronic kidney Includes diseases of arteries, arterioles, and capillaries with ulceration and non-
7 Skin 3
disease pressure, chronic ulcers
Circulatory 4 Includes hypertensive chronic kidney
8 Skin 4 Includes Stages Two Through Four and Unstageable Pressure ulcers
disease
9 Endocrine 3 Includes diabetes with complications Neuro 5 Includes Parkinson’s disease
10 Endocrine 3 Includes diabetes with complications Neuro 7 Includes hemiplegia, paraplegia, and quadriplegia

11 Endocrine 3 Includes diabetes with complications Skin 1 Includes cutaneous abscess, cellulitis, lymphangitis

Includes diseases of arteries, arterioles, and capillaries with ulceration and non-
12 Endocrine 3 Includes diabetes with complications Skin 3
pressure, chronic ulcers

10

10

5
6/3/2021

PDGM - High Comorbidity Adjustment Interaction Subgroups


Comorbidity
Comorbidity Comorbidity
Subgroup Description Description
Subgroup Subgroup
Interaction

Skin 4
13 Heart 10 Includes cardiac dysrhythmias Includes Stages Two Through Four and Unstageable Pressure ulcers

Neuro 10
14 Heart 11 Includes heart failure Includes peripheral and polyneuropathies

15 Heart 11 Includes heart failure Neuro 5 Includes Parkinson’s disease

16 Heart 11 Includes heart failure Skin 1 Includes cutaneous abscess, cellulitis, lymphangitis

Includes diseases of arteries, arterioles, and capillaries with ulceration and non-
17 Heart 11 Includes heart failure Skin 3
pressure, chronic ulcers

18 Heart 11 Includes heart failure Skin 4 Includes Stages Two Through Four and Unstageable Pressure ulcers

Includes diseases of arteries, arterioles, and capillaries with ulceration and non-
19 Heart 12 Includes other heart diseases Skin 3
pressure, chronic ulcers

20 Heart 12 Includes other heart diseases Skin 4 Includes Stages Two Through Four and Unstageable Pressure ulcers

21 Neuro 10 Includes peripheral and polyneuropathies Neuro 5 Includes Parkinson’s disease

22 Neuro 3 Includes dementias Skin 4 Includes Stages Two Through Four and Unstageable Pressure ulcers

11

11

PDGM - High Comorbidity Adjustment Interaction Subgroups

Comorbidity
Comorbidity Comorbidity
Subgroup Description Description
Subgroup Subgroup
Interaction

23 Neuro 5 Includes Parkinson’s disease Renal 3 Includes nephrogenic diabetes insipidus

Includes hemiplegia, paraplegia, and


24 Neuro 7 Renal 3 Includes nephrogenic diabetes insipidus
quadriplegia

Includes Chronic kidney disease and Includes diseases of arteries, arterioles, and capillaries with ulceration and non-
25 Renal 1 Skin 3
ESRD pressure, chronic ulcers

Includes Chronic kidney disease and


26 Renal 1 Skin 4 Includes Stages Two Through Four and Unstageable Pressure ulcers
ESRD

27 Renal 3 Includes nephrogenic diabetes insipidus Skin 4 Includes Stages Two Through Four and Unstageable Pressure ulcers

Includes diseases of arteries, arterioles, and capillaries with ulceration and non-
28 Resp 5 Includes COPD and asthma Skin 3
pressure, chronic ulcers

29 Resp 5 Includes COPD and asthma Skin 4 Includes Stages Two Through Four and Unstageable Pressure ulcers

Includes cutaneous abscess, cellulitis, Includes diseases of arteries, arterioles, and capillaries with ulceration and non-
30 Skin 1 Skin 3
lymphangitis pressure, chronic ulcers

Includes diseases of arteries, arterioles,


Includes Stages Two Through Four and Unstageable Pressure ulcers
31 Skin 3 and capillaries with ulceration and non- Skin 4
pressure, chronic ulcers

12

12

6
6/3/2021

Complex Scenarios
Let's Look At Some Scenarios & Apply What
We Already Know...

13

13

Scenario # 1 – Physician Office Referral 
•You receive a referral from the physician office for Mrs. W. 
•The referral states the patient family phoned the MD office reporting she 
fell at home yesterday and went to the emergency room and she is now 
having difficulty walking. 
•The physician requests the nurse make an evaluation to assess the 
situation.

Question:
◦ Do you accept this referral?

14

14

7
6/3/2021

Scenario # 1 ‐ Possible Options...
A. Refuse to make the visit as the only diagnoses received are 
unacceptable diagnoses
B. Make the visit and phone the physician with update of findings
C. Explain to the physician office that the diagnoses provided are 
unacceptable diagnoses under PDGM and request additional 
information including specific diagnosis information as to the 
diagnosis that is causing the patient to have difficulty walking

15

15

Scenario #1 ‐ Answer
A.Refuse to make the visit as the only diagnoses received are 
unacceptable diagnoses
◦ This response may cause the physician to hesitate in giving the 
agency additional referrals
B. Make the visit and phone the physician with update of findings
◦ This option could potentially negatively impact your agency. If 
the physician does not have any additional diagnosis 
information, the agency would not be able to bill for services

16

16

8
6/3/2021

Scenario #1 ‐ Answer
C. Explain to the physician office that the diagnoses provided are 
unacceptable diagnoses under PDGM and request additional 
information including specific diagnosis information as to the 
diagnosis that is causing the patient to have difficulty walking
 This would be the most appropriate response.
 The agency is explaining why the additional information
is needed, as well as ensuring that the clinician has
current diagnosis information to establish a plan of care

17

17

Scenario #1 – Answer (continued)
•The HHA should have established processes for referrals that are 
received without adequate diagnoses information.
•Consistent requests to physician/referral sources for needed 
diagnosis information will help to improve diagnosis information 
being received during the referral process
•Remember EVERY home health agency is requesting specific 
diagnosis information

18

18

9
6/3/2021

Scenario #2 – Dr. Office Referral for PT
•Dr's office with a referral for physical therapy to see pt ‐ Ataxia. Patient 
was seen by the Dr. yesterday.
•The office person who made the phone call does not have any additional 
information but states she will fax the note from the office visit.
•The fax of the office note documents that the physician noted 
increased ataxia due to her worsening Alzheimer's dementia and she is no 
longer able to safely leave her home alone.
Question:
• How would you code this episode based on the information provided?

19

19

Scenario #2 ‐ Answer
•Primary Diagnosis ‐
◦ G30.9 Alzheimer's disease, unspecified
•Secondary Diagnoses ‐
◦ F02.80 Dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere without 
behavioral disturbance
◦ R27.0 Ataxia, unspecified

20

20

10
6/3/2021

Scenario #2 – Answer (continued)
•In this scenario, Alzheimer's disease is coded primary as the 
physician documented this is the reason for the patient's worsening 
ataxia
•F02.80 Dementia is coded next following the etiology/manifestation 
convention
•Ataxia, R27.0, is also coded as a secondary diagnosis, as ICD–10–CM 
coding guidelines state that codes for signs and symptoms may be 
reported in addition to a related definitive diagnosis when the sign 
or symptom is not routinely associated with that diagnosis

21

21

Scenario #2 – Answer (continued)
•In this scenario, the physician office note clearly states the 
underlying diagnosis causing the patient's ataxia.
•Ensure when reporting to physician at end of admission assessment 
that you inform that the primary diagnosis will be Alzheimer’s based 
on his notes, coding guidelines and PDGM rules. 
•If the visit note did not document a reason for the ataxia, you would 
need to query the physician for further information.
•When querying the physician, be sure to document all 
communication and confirmation of the diagnoses specified.

22

22

11
6/3/2021

Scenario #3 ‐ Physician referral –Patient 
too sick to go to doctor’s office
•You receive a call from Dr. James, he is requesting you make an 
evaluation visit to Mrs. V.
•The patient's family just called the physician office stating they think 
she has the flu, but she is too sick to go to the Dr. Office to be seen.

Question:
• What should you do?

23

23

Scenario #3 ‐Answer
• Initial Assessment –
 As this referral is “questionable” you can complete an
Initial Assessment to determine if the patient meets
eligibility criteria.
 Due to the COVID-19 PHE, as part of the 1135 waivers,
HHAs are permitted to perform Initial Assessments
remotely or by record review to determine the immediate
care and support needs of the patient and eligibility
including homebound status.

24

24

12
6/3/2021

Scenario #3 – Answer (continued)
•Lack of F2F documentation
◦ In the scenario, there is a lack of F2F documentation as the 
patient has not seen the physician for the treatment/diagnosis of 
the flu.
◦ If the patient fails to follow‐up with the physician for having the 
flu, the agency would not receive payment as the patient would 
not have had a F2F encounter for the reason for home health.
•Your Agency should consider policy for acceptance/non‐acceptance 
of patients without current F2F encounter
◦ Accepting a patient without a current F2F puts the agency at risk

25

25

Scenario #3 – Answer (continued)
•If agency decides to accept although there is no Face to Face, then what is the 
patient’s home health primary diagnosis?
•This referral doesn’t have a specific disease or condition confirmed by the 
physician. 
•Therefore, this would not be an accepted referral for home health without the 
physician giving more detailed information with an approved home health 
primary diagnosis. 
•For these reasons, best option is to not accept the patient. 
•Use this as a teaching opportunity to the physician's office regarding what an 
acceptable home health patient referral consists of in this era of HH (this was a 
classic referral in the “Old Days” of HH).  

26

26

13
6/3/2021

Scenario # 4 – Dr Office Referral with 
Unacceptable Diagnosis
•Mr. X referred from MD office for PT for muscle weakness. Patient has DM, HTN.
•HH Intake RN contacts MD office nurse & states HH can no longer take primary 
diagnosis of Muscle Weakness under PDGM. RN asks if the physician thinks that 
primary diagnosis can be Muscle atrophy or wasting, as CMS has given as an 
example.
•MD says patient doesn’t have Muscle atrophy, that is a different condition. He 
says Mr. X is elderly, debilitated, prone to falls and needs PT for exercise for 
strengthening.
•RN asks if agency can use DM as primary diagnosis and send an RN to see Mr. X.
•Physician says yes. States will change diagnosis on FTF. 

27

27

Scenario # 4 (continued)
•HHA admits patient with primary diagnosis DM‐ E11.9 
•Comorbidity / secondary‐ Muscle Weakness, HTN, Fall history

Question:
• Does this scenario provide an acceptable solution under PDGM?

28

28

14
6/3/2021

Scenario #4 ‐ Answer
Answer is NO
• Cannot “lead” the physician to put a primary diagnosis that isn’t 
appropriate in order to admit a pt.
• Mr. X did not have any changed meds; BS stable at 110; no s/s 
hyper/hypoglycemia, diet managed.
• So DM is not appropriate as a primary diagnosis. The clinical record will 
not have any documentation showing justification for use of DM as 
primary diagnosis.
• Result – if there is no acceptable diagnosis that is appropriate for Mr. X 
primary diagnosis, reason for the home health encounter, then the 
agency cannot admit Mr. X.

29

29

Use of Z45.2
•Coders may assign Z45.2 (Encounter for adjustment and 
management of vascular access device) as the principal diagnosis or 
the first listed secondary diagnosis code in order to be placed in the 
Complex Nursing Interventions clinical group.
•If the agency is ONLY doing care of vascular access device and no 
other care being provided, then Z45.2 can be assigned as the 
primary diagnosis.

30

30

15
6/3/2021

Use of Z45.2
•In a case where the patient is receiving an IV antibiotic for sepsis, 
per coding guidelines sepsis should be coded as the primary 
diagnosis 
•CMS instruction is if the IV is not the primary reason the patient 
requires home health care, but where there may be some sort of 
intervention noted on the home health plan of care, then it would be 
appropriate to report Z45.2 (but not as the principal or first 
secondary diagnosis)

31

31

Scenario #5 ‐ Sepsis, IV antibiotics
•You receive a referral from the hospital for Mr. N, who was admitted 
with sepsis, UTI due to E Coli. 
•Pt had PICC line placed and is being discharged home with IV 
antibiotics for 5 additional days. 

Question:
• How could you code this patient?

32

32

16
6/3/2021

Scenario #5 ‐ Sepsis, IV antibiotics
Primary Diagnosis ‐
◦ A41.51 Sepsis due to Escherichia coli 
• Clinical Group‐ MMTA Infection
Secondary Diagnoses –
◦ N39.0 Urinary tract infection, site not specified
◦ Z45.2 Encounter for adjustment and management of vascular 
access device 
◦ Z79.2 Long term (current) use of antibiotics

33

33

Scenario #5 ‐ Sepsis, IV antibiotics
Primary Diagnosis –
◦ A41.51 Sepsis due to Escherichia coli
• Clinical Group‐ Complex Nursing Interventions
Secondary Diagnoses –
◦ Z45.2 Encounter for adjustment and management of vascular 
access device
◦ N39.0 Urinary tract infection, site not specified
◦ Z79.2 Long term (current) use of antibiotics

34

34

17
6/3/2021

Scenario # 6 ‐ Change in 30‐day
•Mrs. J admitted for post op abdominal surg wound care. Has DM and COPD.
•Primary Diagnosis ‐ Z48.01 Encounter for change or removal of surgical wound dressing. 
Clinical Group‐ Wound
•Goal for POC is wound to heal in 3 weeks.
•Goals and interventions on POC for Wound care 3 x week as well as DM and COPD.
•Week 4 wound is healed. However, blood sugars have been over parameters. Pt not 
following ADA diet. MD orders new meds and dietician.
•Wound healing is what was planned at SOC.
•Patient not discharged, however, as DM requires interventions, education, & visits

35

35

Scenario # 6 ‐ Change in 30‐Day 
(continued)
•Day 28 visit, patient still has elevated blood sugar, physician requests continued visits.
•2nd 30 day – will have a new primary diagnosis of DM. Physician’s order obtained for 
primary diagnosis change. Primary Diagnosis of DM‐ E11.9, put on the claim, to change 
the clinical grouping to MMTA‐ Endocrine.
•Follow up OASIS not done for SCIC / change in primary diagnosis because wound healing 
was expected on POC. And DM was already being cared for on POC interventions and 
goals.
•CMS did not make it mandatory for OASIS follow up to be done for diagnosis changes at 
2nd 30‐day period; it is up to agency to decide if OASIS follow will be done or not.
•Per CoP’s, HHA is required to complete an ‘other follow‐up’ (RFA 05) assessment when 
such a change would be considered a major decline or improvement in the patient’s 
health status.

36

36

18
6/3/2021

Scenario # 6 ‐ 30‐Day Change
•Patient admitted with exacerbation COPD J44.1 Chronic obstructive pulmonary 
disease with (acute) exacerbation, Clinical Group MMTA ‐ Respiratory
•Patient falls day 25 – ER, injury‐severe laceration lower leg, no hospitalization 
•OASIS RFA #5 follow‐up other completed by RN.  
•Physical therapy ordered, RN to do wound care daily x 7, then 3 x week.

•2ND 30 DAY 
◦ Primary diagnosis changed to laceration left leg‐ S81.812D ‐ Clinical Group 
Wound‐ as this is the diagnosis requiring the most intensive services 

37

37

Scenario # 7 – Primary Diagnosis Effects 
on Comorbidity Adjustment
◦ Referral 1:
• Pt with diagnosis of exacerbation diastolic CHF, also has
HTN and stage 2 pressure ulcer to coccyx.
 MD has ordered SN visits 3 x week to monitor cardiac status, 
response to med changes, wound care is 2 x week
• Primary I11.0, Secondary- I50.31 & L89.152 – results in a
high comorbidity adjustment- Comorbidity Subgroup
interaction #18 Heart 11 and Skin 4

38

38

19
6/3/2021

Scenario # 8 – Primary Diagnosis Effects 
on Comorbidity Adjustment
Referral 2: 
• Pt with diagnosis of stage 2 pressure ulcer to coccyx, also has 
Dx of HTN and CHF. 
• MD ordered SN visits 2 x week for wound care.
Primary L89.152, Secondary- I11.0 & I50.9- results in a low
comorbidity adjustment- Both I11.0 & I50.9 are in the
comorbidity subgroup Heart 11
***Primary diagnosis is not factored into the comorbidity 
adjustment

39

39

Scenario # 9 – Missing Discharge 
Summary
◦ Referral Scenario 1: Mrs. Z referred to HH for post op care after having 
gallbladder removed
◦ Only information given is that patient is debilitated, weak, has difficulty 
walking and lives alone.
◦ HHA admits and codes : Z48.815 Encounter for surgical aftercare 
following surgery on the digestive system
◦ Clinical group : MMTA Surgical Aftercare
◦ Comorbidity – None ‐No secondary diagnoses are in the comorbidity 
groups for low or high
• R53.81 Debility
• R53.1 Weakness
• R26.2 Difficulty Walking
• Z60.2 Lives Alone
40

40

20
6/3/2021

Scenario # 9 –No Comorbidity  Coding 
Scenario – First 30‐Day Period
This scenario based on:
• Admission Source – Institutional
• Timing – Early
• Clinical Group – MMTA Surgical Aftercare
• Functional Impairment Level – High
• Comorbidity Adjustment – None
HIPPS of 2GC11, case mix weight of 1.4027, LUPA threshold of 5, and 
payment of $2,254.53

41

41

Scenario # 9 – Missing Discharge 
Summary
Referral Scenario 2: Mrs. Z referred to HH for post op care after having 
gallbladder removed. In the hospital EMR, there is documentation in 
Discharge summary that patient has these diagnoses: HTN, CHF, COPD
◦ HHA admits and codes : Z48.815 Encounter for surgical aftercare 
following surgery on the digestive system
◦ Clinical group : MMTA Surgical Aftercare
◦ Comorbidity – Low
• I11.0 Hypertensive heart disease w/heart failure
• I50.9 Heart Failure unspecified • R53.1 Weakness
• J44.9 COPD unspecified • R26.2 Difficulty Walking
• R53.81 Debility • Z60.2 Lives Alone

42

42

21
6/3/2021

Scenario # 9 –Low Comorbidity  Coding 
Scenario – First 30‐Day Period
This scenario based on:
• Admission Source – Institutional
• Timing – Early
• Clinical Group – MMTA Surgical Aftercare
• Functional Impairment Level – High
• Comorbidity Adjustment – Low
◦ I11.0 Hypertensive heart disease w/heart failure & I50.9 Heart failure 
unspecified are both in the low comorbidity subgroup Heart 11
HIPPS of 2GC21, case mix weight of 1.4535, LUPA threshold of 5, and payment 
of $2336.18

43

43

Scenario # 9 – Additional Clinical 
Information Confirmed at SOC Visit
Referral Scenario 3: Mrs. Z referred to HH for post op care after 
having gallbladder removed. In the hospital EMR, there is 
documentation in Discharge summary that patient has HTN, CHF, 
COPD. During the SOC visit, the SN notes that the patient has a 
wound on her left ankle.
• RN calls the PCP‐ confirms that the patient has a chronic stasis 
ulcer due to venous insufficiency and receives orders for wound 
care to be done 2 x week.

44

44

22
6/3/2021

Scenario # 9 – Additional Clinical Information 
Confirmed at SOC Visit (continued)
◦ Referral scenario 3
◦ HHA admits and codes : Z48.815 Encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery on the 
digestive system
◦ Clinical group : MMTA Surgical Aftercare
◦ Comorbidity – High
• I87.2 Venous insufficiency (chronic) (peripheral)
• L97.322 Non‐pressure ulcer of left ankle w/fat layer exposed
• I11.0 Hypertensive heart disease with heart failure
• I50.9 Heart Failure unspecified • R53.1 Weakness
• J44.9 COPD unspecified • R26.2 Difficulty Walking
• R53.81 Debility • Z60.2 Lives Alone

45

45

Scenario # 9 –High Comorbidity – Coding 
Scenario – First 30‐Day Period
◦ Comorbidity Subgroup Interaction # 17 –
• L97.322 Non‐pressure ulcer of left ankle w/fat layer exposed‐ comorbidity 
subgroup Skin 3, 
• I11.0 Hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, I50.9 Heart failure unspecified‐
both comorbidity subgroup Heart 11
◦ Comorbidity Subgroup Interaction # 28 –
• L97.322 Non‐pressure ulcer of left ankle w/fat layer exposed‐comorbidity 
subgroup Skin 3
• J44.9 COPD unspecified‐comorbidity subgroup Resp 5

46

46

23
6/3/2021

Scenario # 9 –High Comorbidity  Coding 
Scenario – First 30‐Day Period
• Admission Source – Institutional
• Timing – Early
• Clinical Group – MMTA Surgical Aftercare
• Functional Impairment Level – High
• Comorbidity Adjustment – High
HIPPS of 2GC31, case mix weight of 1.5501, LUPA threshold of 5, and 
payment of $2491.44

47

47

Scenario # 10 – Coding Sequencing
•Referral from hospital for Mr. C, who has been hospitalized for 2 weeks. He was initially 
admitted for amputation of his left great toe due to diabetic ulcer with gangrene. 
•He subsequently developed a UTI which was treated with IV abx and has resolved. 
•He was also noted to have AKI, hypokalemia, and hyponatremia which were treated and 
have resolved. 
•He has a history of PVD, HTN, CHF, CKD 3, Atrial  Fib, h/o prostate cancer, BPH, urinary 
incontinence, and he lives alone. 
•The surgical amputation site is healing well. The physician has ordered SN for wound 
care to surgical site 2 x week and PT 3 x week for evaluation, gait training and safety
How would you code this patient?  

48

48

24
6/3/2021

Scenario # 10 – Coding Sequencing
•You would not code DM ulcer with gangrene as the ulcer and 
gangrene were resolved by the amputation
•You would not code the UTI, AKI, hypokalemia or hyponatremia as 
they are resolved
•You would code the patient’s pertinent medical diagnosis that may 
affect the POC

49

49

Scenario # 10 – Coding Sequencing
• Z47.81 Encounter for orthopedic aftercare following surgical  • I48.91 Unspecified Atrial Fib
amputation • N40.1 Benign prostatic hyperplasia with lower 
• Z89.412 Acquired absence of left great toe urinary tract symptoms
• E11.51 Type 2 DM with diabetic peripheral angiopathy without  • R32 Unspecified urinary incontinence
gangrene
• Z60.2 Problems related to living alone
• E11.22 Type 2 DM with diabetic chronic kidney disease • Z86.31 h/o diabetic ulcer
• I13.0 Hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease with heart  • Z87.440 Personal history of UTI
failure and stage 1‐4 CKD
• Z85.46 Personal history of malignant neoplasm of 
• I50.9 Heart failure unspecified
prostate
• N18.30 Chronic kidney disease, stage 3 unspecified • Z79.01 Current (long term) use of anticoagulant

50

50

25
6/3/2021

Scenario # 10 –Low Comorbidity –
Coding Scenario – First 30‐Day Period
◦ I13.0 is in comorbidity subgroup Circulatory 4
◦ I50.9 is in subgroup Heart 11
◦ DM diagnoses are in group Endocrine 3 which is not in one of the 14 low 
comorbidity subgroups
◦ A fib is in group Heart 10 which is not in one of the 14 low comorbidity 
subgroups
◦ BPH is in group Renal 3 which is not in one of the 14 low comorbidity 
subgroups
◦ None of the Z codes are in a comorbidity subgroup
◦ This combination of diagnoses does not have any Comorbidity Subgroup 
Interactions, therefore no High Comorbidity adjustment

51

51

Scenario # 10 –Low Comorbidity –
Coding Scenario – First 30‐Day Period
This scenario based on:
• Admission Source – Institutional
• Timing – Early
• Clinical Group –MS Rehab
• Functional Impairment Level – High
• Comorbidity Adjustment – Low
HIPPS of 2EC21, case mix weight of 1.5773, LUPA threshold of 6, and 
payment of $2535.16

52

52

26
6/3/2021

Scenario # 11 – COVID‐19
•Referral from hospital for Mr. A, an 80‐year‐old male who was 
admitted to the hospital with symptoms of cough, fever, and 
weakness for the past week. 
•He is diagnosed COVID 19 and has a history of HTN and CAD. 
•He is discharged home after 3 weeks in the hospital with orders for 
PT for treatment of weakness with difficulty ambulating. 
•The physician documents COVID‐19 and weakness on the F2F.
•How would you code this patient?  

53

53

Scenario # 11 – COVID‐19 ‐ Coding


Primary Diagnosis –
• U07.1 COVID ‐19 
Secondary Diagnoses –
• R53.1 Weakness
• R26.2 Difficulty ambulating
• I25.10 Atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina 
pectoris
• I10 Essential (primary) hypertension

54

54

27
6/3/2021

Scenario # 11 – COVID‐19 ‐ Rationale


Rationale‐
•In this scenario, even though it has been 3 weeks since the patient tested 
positive for COVID, there has not been a follow up test done and the physician 
has not documented that the patient no longer has COVID. There is no specific 
timeframe for considering a COVID diagnosis as current vs history. Coding is 
based on the physician documentation.
•As the physician has documented COVID 19 with weakness and difficulty 
ambulating on the F2F, per the guidelines U07.1 is coded primary with symptom 
codes of R53.1 weakness and R26.2 difficulty ambulating are coded as 
additional diagnoses. Codes for signs and symptoms may be reported in 
addition to a related definitive diagnosis when the sign or symptom is not 
routinely associated with that diagnosis. 
•I10 and I25.10 are coded as they are comorbidities.
55

55

Scenario # 11 – COVID‐19 
Situations similar to this are a commonly seen in home health. 
You must query the physician if there are any concerns related to COVID being a 
current diagnosis and for symptom codes received without a current COVID 
diagnosis. 
COVID‐19 is a significant public health issue, and for some people there can be long 
term effects following infection.  
These can range from symptoms such as loss of smell or taste, or can include chronic 
respiratory failure, in some cases particularly following COVID‐19 pneumonia or 
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS).

56

56

28
6/3/2021

Scenario # 11 – COVID‐19 
WHO has added a new code to ICD‐10 at U09.9, for Post COVID‐19 condition, 
unspecified. 
At the March 2021 ICD‐10 Coordination & Maintenance Committee Meeting it was 
proposed to add this code in ICD‐10‐CM and the implementation date was expected 
to be October 1, 2021.
However, April 27, 2021, CMS released the FY 2022 Hospital IPPS proposed rule 
which includes the proposed 2022 ICD‐10 codes, but U09.9 Post COVID‐19 condition 
was not one of the proposed codes. 
You can submit comments on this regulation until June 28, 2021 –
http://www.regulations.gov

57

57

Scenario # 12 – COVID‐19
 Referral from hospital for Mr. J, patient with a diagnoses of
COVID-19 with pneumonia. He also has diagnoses of
emphysema and COPD due to smoking. He is discharged home to 
continue with antibiotics for the pneumonia and continuous oxygen 
which is not new. 

• How would you code this patient?

58

58

29
6/3/2021

Scenario # 12 – COVID‐19 ‐ Coding


Primary Diagnosis –
• U07.1 COVID –19
Secondary Diagnoses –
• J12.82 Pneumonia due to coronavirus disease 2019
• J43.9 Emphysema
• F17.218 Nicotine dependence, cigarettes, with
other nicotine induced disorders
• Z99.81 Dependence on supplemental oxygen

59

59

Scenario # 12 – COVID‐19 ‐ Rationale


Rationale-
 The COVID-19 is coded as primary with all the manifestations of
the COVID-19 following, therefore J12.82 Pneumonia due to coronavirus
disease 2019 is coded next.
 J43.9 Emphysema unspecified is coded as the guidelines state when
COPD unspecified and emphysema are both documented by the
provider, emphysema is coded.
 The nicotine dependence with other induced disorders is coded because
the emphysema and COPD are documented as related to the smoking.
 The oxygen is an important part of the plan of care so is also coded.

60

60

30
6/3/2021

Scenario # 13 – COVID‐19
 Referral from hospital for Mrs. Z, who was hospitalized for
COVID 19 with pneumonia and acute respiratory failure
complicated by a 15-year history of COPD which
was exacerbated.
 She recovered and went to rehab for four weeks for strengthening. 
 Prior to discharge home the patient tested negative for COVID 19.

• How would you code this patient?

61

61

Scenario # 13 – COVID‐19 ‐ Coding


Primary Diagnosis –
• J44.1 COPD exacerbation
Secondary Diagnoses –
• Z86.16 Personal history of COVID‐19
• Z87.01 Personal history of pneumonia
• Z99.81 Dependence on supplemental oxygen

62

62

31
6/3/2021

Scenario # 13 – COVID‐19 ‐ Rationale


Rationale-
 The COPD was exacerbated and is the focus of care so is
coded as primary.
 The patient now tests negative for the COVID-19 virus, so the
history code is used.
• FY2021 Coding Guidance "Personal history of COVID-19 - For patients
with a history of COVID-19, assign code Z86.16, Personal history of
COVID-19. "
 The pneumonia is resolved so history is coded.
 Oxygen use is also coded.

63

63

Scenario # 14 ‐ COVID‐19
Patient was admitted to hospital 2 weeks ago with a diagnosis of
COVID-19. The patient now tests negative for COVID-19, however the
physician has documented the patient has multisystem inflammatory
syndrome as a sequelae of COVID-19.

How would you code this patient?

64

64

32
6/3/2021

Scenario # 14 ‐ COVID‐19
Primary Diagnosis -
• M35.81 (Multisystem inflammatory syndrome)

Secondary Diagnosis -
• B94.8 (Sequelae of other specified infectious and parasitic
diseases)

65

65

Scenario # 14 ‐ COVID‐19
Rationale -
Per the coding guidelines “If MIS develops as a result of a previous
COVID19 infection, assign codes M35.81 (Multisystem inflammatory
syndrome) and B94.8 (Sequelae of other specified infectious and
parasitic diseases).”

66

66

33
6/3/2021

Scenario # 15 – COVID ‐19
78‐year‐old patient with history of CHF, HTN, and mild intermittent asthma, presented 
to the hospital six days ago, complaining of developing cough two days prior and upon 
presentation having chills, fatigue, and becoming notably more SOB. Patient was found 
to be hypoxic with pulse ox of 87%; rapid test was positive for COVID‐
19, and CXR showed bilateral ground glass opacites. Patient was admitted 
with COVID Pneumonia. Pt was started on oxygen, received Remdesivir x 5 days and 
Dexamethasone.
Patient’s respiratory status stabilized, and he is being discharged home today on 
oxygen, decreasing doses of oral prednisone, with SN ordered for respiratory 
assessment, medication and disease process teaching.
How would you code this patient?

67

67

Scenario # 15 – COVID ‐19 ‐ Answer


Primary ‐
• U07.1 (COVID‐19) 

Secondary –
• J12.82 (Pneumonia due to coronavirus disease 2019)  
• I11.0 (Hypertensive heart disease with heart failure) 
• I50.9 (Heart failure, unspecified)
• J45.20 (Mild intermittent asthma, uncomplicated) 
• Z99.81 (Dependence on supplemental oxygen) 

68

68

34
6/3/2021

Scenario # 15 – COVID ‐19 ‐ Rationale


COVID‐19 is coded primary as per the guidelines – “When the reason for the 
encounter/admission is a respiratory manifestation of COVID‐19, assign code U07.1
(COVID‐19) as the principal/first‐listed diagnosis and assign code(s) for the 
respiratory manifestation(s) as additional diagnoses.
New code for pneumonia due to COVID‐19 as of Jan 1 — J12.82 is the first secondary 
diagnosis.
I11.0 is coded next, followed by
I50.9 unspecified as there was no additional 
documentation of the type of heart failure
J45.20 is coded next followed by Z99.81 as the patient was d/c home on oxygen.  

69

69

Scenario # 15 – COVID ‐19
Four weeks later, the same patient returns to the ER reporting sudden onset of 
SOB, chest pain and palpitations. D dimer was elevated, and V/Q scan revealed 
a Pulmonary embolism. A repeat COVID‐19 test was negative, and the 
physician diagnosed the patient with PE due to recent history of COVID‐19. The 
patient was discharged on Warfarin and the nurse is to obtain INR in three 
days, and patient is to continue home oxygen. 

How would you code this patient?

70

70

35
6/3/2021

Scenario # 15 – COVID ‐19 ‐ Answer


Primary
• I26.99 (Other pulmonary embolism without acute cor pulmonale) 
Secondary
• B94.8 (Sequelae of COVID‐19)
• I11.0 (Hypertensive heart disease with heart failure) 
• I50.9 (Heart failure, unspecified)
• J45.20 (Mild intermittent asthma, uncomplicated)
• Z51.81 (Encounter for therapeutic drug level monitoring) 
• Z79.01 (Long term (current) use of anticoagulants) 
• Z99.81 (Dependence on supplemental oxygen)

71

71

Scenario # 15 – COVID ‐19 ‐ Rationale


I26.99 is coded primary as per the physician documentation the PE is a 
result of a recent COVID‐19 infection, which is followed 
by B94.8 (Sequelae of other specified infectious and parasitic diseases).
I11.0, I50.9, J45.20 are comorbidities that may affect the patient and are 
coded.
Z51.81 is coded as the nurse is to obtain an INR and there is a code also 
note at Z51.81 that states to code also any long‐term (current) drug 
therapy, therefore Z79.01 is also coded.
Z99.81 is coded as the patient is to continue home oxygen.  

72

72

36
6/3/2021

Scenario # 16 ‐ Vaping
19‐year‐old patient was admitted to hospital with acute respiratory 
distress syndrome, abdominal pain and diarrhea secondary to e‐cigarette 
use/vaping. 

How would you code this patient?  

73

73

Scenario # 16 ‐ Vaping ‐ Answer


Primary
• U07.0 Vaping‐related disorder
Secondary
• J80 Acute respiratory distress syndrome
• R10.84 Generalized abdominal pain
• R19.7 Diarrhea, unspecified
• F17.298 Nicotine dependence, other tobacco product, with other nicotine‐
induced disorders

74

74

37
6/3/2021

Scenario # 16 ‐ Vaping ‐ Rationale


U07.0 is coded primary as the guidance states when patients present 
with conditions related to vaping, assign code U07.0 as the principal 
diagnosis.
The guidance states to assign additional codes for other manifestations, 
so J80, R10.84, R19.7 are also coded
As the patient uses an e‐cigarette F17.298 is also coded 

75

75

Education

76

76

38
6/3/2021

Intake
•Must ensure that intake process is such that No Unacceptable 
Diagnoses will go through to admission 

Admitting Clinician‐
• Ensure thorough knowledge of acceptable diagnosis, skilled need
• Diagnosis specifics
• When and how to Query physicians 

77

77

Coding Department 
•If unaccepted diagnosis, send immediately back to clinical manager.
•Clinical manager addresses for this patient, but also uses to educate and 
tighten processes to prevent this from occurring.
•Coding ensures all secondary diagnosis that may affect the POC are coded 
to the highest level of specificity.
•Coder has access to grouper tool in order to see the clinical group, low or 
high comorbidity adjustment.
•Some EMRs have "grouper like" functionality within their software that 
can identify clinical groups, low/high comorbidity, functional impairment

78

78

39
6/3/2021

Conclusion
•PDGM requires HHA’s to ensure that patients are appropriate to be 
admitted to Home Health by having an Acceptable Primary Diagnosis
•If physician doesn’t provide an underlying cause for an unacceptable 
diagnosis and there are no other appropriate diagnoses for home health, 
then may not be able to accept a pt. 
•Code to highest specificity!
•Code to Coding Guidelines, Physician documentation & Comprehensive 
Assess
•Many Scenarios under PDGM you will find patient by patient!  

79

79

80

80

40
6/3/2021

Thank You 
For Participating! 
info@healthcareprovidersolutions.com

81

81

41

You might also like