Tesco Scandal Rijul Rana

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1

What went wrong?

Hidden agreements with suppliers- As key personnel realized that sales targets weren’t
going to be met hidden agreements were made with suppliers.
Offered suppliers in store promotion, bonus payments etc. - These agreements offered
to suppliers benefits such as in store promotions, bonus payments etc. if Tesco hits the
sales targets.
Revenue recognized in the wrong accounting period- The payments that Tesco received
from the suppliers were purposefully recognized in the wrong accounting period. In
some cases Tesco even ended up paying back the supplier in the subsequent period.
Commercial income seemed steady despite declining sales- This false recognition of
future revenue meant that commercial income seemed steady despite sales declining
Withholding money due to suppliers- It was later found that Tesco was also
withholding money due to suppliers in order to boost performance
Manipulation over business costs- They were also thought to be manipulating business
cost. This centered on the booking of out of date food and stock theft.

About the scam


The challenges faced by Tesco which is arguably the biggest retailer in the United
Kingdom all started during the first half of their financial year. The issue at hand
involved Tesco overstating their profits by 250 million pounds. This arose both due to
internal management pressures and external pressures from the retail industry. Tesco
had been facing increased competition from competitors such as ALDI and LIDL. These
supermarkets stocked fewer products and could therefore price them cheaper which
consumers appeared to be reacting well to. In 2014 Tesco’s market share reduced by 3
percent whilst ALDI and LIDL increased by approximately 4 percent each. These factors
along with management pushing for higher profits increased the incentive for the
perpetrators to commit fraud. According to Deloitte, a leading company auditor across
the globe; the company had been overstating its profits for a number of years. The
overstatement of profits amounted to fraudulent actions against the suppliers which
further worsened the company’s situation despite the high financial standing which it
claimed to be in.

You might also like