Unit 5 Writing Test

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3

American English in Action Name: Thinh

Unit 5 writing test IELTS 4.0

Task 1
The graph below shows the changes in the maximum number of Asian elephants between
1994 and 2007.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make
comparisons where relevant.
You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.

The bar chart illustrates the difference in the total Asian elephant number living in nine
specific countries over a 14-year period, from 1944 to 2007.

Generally speaking, the number of elephants in every countries suffered a decline over
this time period, with the exception Cambodia, which the number of elephants saw a growth
in this country. In addition, India always had the most elephants, and China always had the
least elephants among the nines.

More specifically, in 1994, the number of elephants in India was nearly 10000, while
China had only a tenth of that. From then to 2007, the elephant number of India saw a
significant drop to 7500, and China’s elephant decreased a half of its number to only 500, a
difference of seven thousand elephants.

Myanmar was the country with the second highest number of elephants. In 1994 and
2007, the number of elephant in Myanmar was slightly less than 5000 and a half and slightly
over 4500 respectively. While that, Laos, which is the second lowest country in the number of
elephants, had almost the same number of elephants in the same two years, slightly over a
thousand.

One interesting point to notice that, Cambodia was the only country that got an
increase in the number of elephants over this time period with the number of 250, from 2250
to 2500.

Task 2

In the modern world it is no longer necessary to use animals for food, clothing or medicine. To
what extent do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include examples from your own experience.

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.

Although the human society and science is developing continuously, we are still referred
on animals to survive, for their meat, and medical purposes, but a group of people have said
that using animals for food, clothing or medicine is unessential in modern world. In my
opinion, I strongly believe that animals are an inseparable part in human lives, on food and
medicine, but not clothing.

First, meat provides us a variety of nutrition: proteins, vitamins, and minerals. We can
not find some of those in herbs, and that is why we need to continue consuming meat. Of
course, human now can make synthenic vitamins and minerals, but think about how
inconvenience it is when you have to take addition medicines after meals. Also, proteins can
not be synthesized due to their complexity. With present technology, it is impossible to do
that, and if we could, the prices would not be affordable.

The problem is the same with medicine, which some of the compounds can not be
synthesized. A prime example for it is alpha-chymotrypsine, which is extracted from cows, and
still can not be synthesized since it was discovered in 20th century. The need of medical
treatment is increasing day by day, so if we do not use animals to extract chemical compounds
for medical purposes, many people may die.

Although I do not deny the importance of animals in those two purposes above, I am
against the use of animal leather to make clothes, because of its ruthlessness. Many crocodiles
and snakes and foxes and rabbits are killed to make luxurious items everday, and how people
kill them really makes me feel angry and disappointed, because it is unacceptable. It also
makes some species in danger, and facing extinction. Of course, using sheep fur is acceptable
bacause it does not harm the animal.

In conclusion, I disagree that animals are unnecessary to our lives, but using animals for
clothing is somewhat heartless.

You might also like