Rural Marketing Research
Rural Marketing Research
Rural Marketing Research
Every marketer has to work with finite and limited resources, in terms of
both money and manpower. It is a simple truism that the more focused
the application of these research resources in the most fertile of target
areas, the better the results will be.
The initial lack of information led to trial and error kind of decisions
regarding the market, some of which were costly and made way for need
for focused information and hence market research began to evolve.
Agencies and organisations with urban market fortes started making
efforts and the age of the commissioned study gave way to more of policy
research.
ORG Retail Audit, one of the most successful market research report
providers, began compiling information with substantive inputs on both
urban and rural markets. Advertising agencies, media buying houses and
corporates rely heavily today on this data, which has a virtual monopoly
in the market in the area of information generated from the rural audit.
Today, there are many published data on the rural markets, which help
the marketers unravel the dynamics of the rural market. The R.K.
Swamy/BSLDO guide to market planning incorporating media coverage
at the district level is another excellent source of data. Published first in
1986, it was the first time ever that the traditional rural-urban divide was
broken, and the district was viewed as the composite unit for market
planning.
2. Time:
Willing to respond. Have time pressures. Spare little or virtually no time
to field staff.
3. Accessibility:
Easy to access, though many suffer from research fatigue.
6. Sampling:
Respondents form relatively homogeneous group. Income can be
criteria.
7. Data Collection:
Use of sophisticated instrument, style and administration. Respondents,
comfortable with numbers, ratings and timelines.
Rural:
Aspect:
1. Respondents:
Semiliterate or illiterate, brand knowledge low. Difficult to get individual
responses. Generally group response.
2. Time:
Willing to respond. Have time pressures. Spare little or virtually no time
to field staff.-Hesitant initially, but once opens up, devotes time.
3. Accessibility:
Tough to access; geographical distances and psychological
apprehensions are barriers. Do not speak easily to outsiders.
6. Sampling:
Heterogeneous groups. Income and land holding to be carefully applied.
7. Data Collection:
Requires simplified instruments. Respondents comfortable with colours,
picture and stories.
The broad differences in the rural and urban research and how the
distinct differences are critical while developing a suitable research
design for researching in respective markets. However, in the context of
rural markets the research process is critical for two prime reasons-
ii. The marketer who is urban oriented may find it useful to unlearn
consumer response to decision variables in the urban market. This
requires the use of research methodology that is sensitive to social
processes in rural marketing.
What is important to understand is that rural markets are not as evolved
as urban markets and hence it might not be appropriate to use the tools
and techniques used in the urban markets. For instance, the VALE-
Lifestyle Analysis model would be difficult to implement locally owing to
the respondent’s lack of awareness about several issues which are usually
covered in the VALS classification.
A more stripped down qualitative research will be a more feasible option.
In depth interviews, observational study or open-ended questionnaire
will be easy to implement.
ORG-MARG has a rural consumer panel referred to as the R panel
comprising 20,000 households whose purchasing and consumption
habits are monitored every day. The study covers 16 state clusters over
1000 villages and 32 FMCG product categories.
Initiative Media, the AP Lintas media buying arm developed Lin-Quest-
a software package that provides marketers with data on rural India and
this package helps in using the census data in an interactive manner.
MICA has also developed a report referred to as the MICA
Rural Market Ratings, covering aspects of:
A. Digital Maps:
Covering all the districts in the country including those of Jammu and
Kashmir is included in the maps.
These cover:
i. Boundaries of districts
ii. Location of Tehsil headquarters
iii. National highways
iv. State highways
v. Metaled roads
vi. Railway lines along with railway stations.
B. Rural Socio-Economic Indicators:
A total of 42 socioeconomic indicators are given for all the districts in the
country except the 14 districts of Jammu and Kashmir.
For each district the socioeconomic indicators are classified in
the following categories:
i. Demographics
ii. Major occupations
iii. Communication methods
iv. Education profile
v. Shops and other establishments
vi. Commercial banks
vii. Agriculture data
viii. Medical facilities
ix. Major crops of the district.
C. Names and Population of All Villages in India:
The data covers each of the 6,31,307 villages in the country.