The document discusses various definitions of literature, including writings that exhibit excellence of form, writings of permanent or universal interest, imaginative writing, and works that use highly connotative language. It also notes debates around defining literature and alternatives such as including works from history, philosophy, and science. Writers define literature differently, emphasizing rereadability, language charged with meaning, or the union of suffering and form.
The document discusses various definitions of literature, including writings that exhibit excellence of form, writings of permanent or universal interest, imaginative writing, and works that use highly connotative language. It also notes debates around defining literature and alternatives such as including works from history, philosophy, and science. Writers define literature differently, emphasizing rereadability, language charged with meaning, or the union of suffering and form.
The document discusses various definitions of literature, including writings that exhibit excellence of form, writings of permanent or universal interest, imaginative writing, and works that use highly connotative language. It also notes debates around defining literature and alternatives such as including works from history, philosophy, and science. Writers define literature differently, emphasizing rereadability, language charged with meaning, or the union of suffering and form.
The document discusses various definitions of literature, including writings that exhibit excellence of form, writings of permanent or universal interest, imaginative writing, and works that use highly connotative language. It also notes debates around defining literature and alternatives such as including works from history, philosophy, and science. Writers define literature differently, emphasizing rereadability, language charged with meaning, or the union of suffering and form.
literary work especially as an occupation; writings in prose or verses; writings having excellence of form and expression and expressing ideas of permanent or universal interest; the body of writings on a particular subject; printed matter (as leaflets or circulars); the aggregate of musical compositions. “Literature as writing that exhibits excellence of form or expression.” • This definition emphasizes artistic worth, and limits the range of literature to works which are distinguished by their style, composition, and general force of presentation. The term literature thus becomes an expression of value judgment. • The problem with this definition, according to Wellek and Warren, is that it tends to confine literature to what we call “great books.” It may blind us to the value of experimental works, or works that do not follow the conventional rules of writing. • This they say has pedagogical value; but may also do harm because it excludes many works that may not exhibit the qualities of the so-called great books but which are nevertheless worthy of consideration as literature. “Literature as writing of permanent or universal interest.” • The reference is to the great books (masterpieces) that exhibit a high level of craftsmanship, and that have endured, or have withstood the changes of time. • Those who subscribe to what we would call the universalist notion of literature believe that great works of a literature will have the same value anytime, anywhere. Valued highly in the past during the time they were composed, these works are still being appreciated today. These works were appreciated not only by their original writers but also by readers from different cities or cultures. “Literature as writing of permanent or universal interest.”
• Such a universalist notion is disputed by those
who claim that there is no such thing as ideas of permanent or universal value. According to them, all ideas and all artistic works for that matter are subject to the changes of time and taste. Moreover, our responses to the works of art are conditioned or influenced by our cultural background or orientation. • A literary work considered great in one particular period may be forgotten or depreciated in another time. A masterpiece by a particular cultural group may hold no value at all to others. Alternative Definitions of Literature • When dictionary fails, the usual recourse is to consider literature as „imaginative writing‟. This view involves the old distinction between fact and fiction: literature deals with things imagined; non- literature (history) with known facts. • Wellek and Warren: “In all of them, the reference is to a world of fiction, of imagination. The statements in a novel, in a poem, or in a drama are not literally true; they are not logical …” • If we look at history, literature has also traditionally embraced works that may not be considered, strictly speaking, as imaginative writing. Alternative Definitions of Literature • Example: English literature includes the essays of Francis Bacon (a philosopher) and Thomas Huxley (a scientist), French literature includes the philosophical works of Descartes and Pascal, and Philippine Literature includes the polemical essays of Renato Constantino, a historian and social commentator. • The distinction between fact and fiction on which the definition rests, “seems unlikely to get us very far, not least because the distinction itself is often questionable one (Eagleton).” There are societies or ethnic groups who believe that their myths embody is not fiction but fact; while there are fictional works (pulp romances) which are often not categorized as literature. Alternative Way of Looking at the Problem of Defining Literature
• Wellek and Warren (Theory of Literature): “The main
difference between the language of science and the language of literature may be summarized in this manner: scientific language is purely denotative, whereas literary language is highly connotative.” – Denote: applies to the definitive meaning content of a term: in a noun, the thing or the definable class of things or ideas which it names; in a verb, the act or state which is affirmed. – Connote: applies to the ideas or associations that are added to a term and cling to it, often as a result of personal experience but sometimes as a result of something extraneous (as a widely known context with a widely known event). • „Purely Denotative‟: it tries to establish one-to-one correspondence between the word and what it refers to. It aims at exactness. Alternative Way of Looking at the Problem of Defining Literature
• „Highly Connotative‟: it does not only
refer to something but also communicates the tone of the speaker and tries to affect the reader in various ways. Literary language exhibits richness of meaning that cannot be found in language used in a purely denotative sense. • Difference of literature from other types of literature invokes two things: its fictionality and its peculiar use of language. Alternative Way of Looking at the Problem of Defining Literature
• Literature, therefore, is a work of fiction
characterized by a very self-conscious use of language which is highly connotative in nature. • Literature is at best a fluid concept; it is not a fixed abstract category but a socially constructed norm which changes in various contexts. • Terry Eagleton: “Literature, in the sense of a set of works of assured and unalterable value, distinguished by certain shared inherent properties, does not exist.” Two Definitions of Literature: 1. A Dictionary of Literary Terms (J.A. Cuddon): Literature: a vague term which usually denotes works that belong to the major genres: epic, drama, lyric, novel, short story, ode,… – There are many works which cannot be classified in the main literary genres which nevertheless may be regarded as literature by virtue of excellence of their writing, their originality, and their general aesthetic and artistic merits. – Example: Aristotle‟s treatises on Poetics and Rhetoric; Gibbon‟s Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire; Darwin‟s On the Origin of Species; and Dame Rebbeca West‟s The Meaning of Treason. Two Definitions of Literature:
2. A Dictionary of Literary, Dramatic and
Cinematic Terms (S. Barnet, M. Berman, and W. Burto): Literature: sometimes means anything written. – Most critics regard such definition as too broad because it includes pamphlets on how to make money from guppies, and too narrow because it excludes such oral compositions as ballads and folk tales. Perhaps one can begin by saying that literature uses language in compositions that are valuable in themselves. Literature as Seen by Writers and Wits • Cyril Connoly (Enemies of Promise): “Literature is the art of writing something that will be read twice; journalism what will be read at once. • Ezra Pound (How to Read): “Great Literature is simply language charged with meaning to the utmost possible degree.” • Robert Louis Stevenson (Memories and Portraits): “Literature in many of its branches is no other than the shadow of good talk.” • John, Viscount Morley (Critical Miscellanies): “Literature – the most seductive, the most deceiving, the most dangerous of professions.” Literature as Seen by Writers and Wits • Ralph Waldo Emerson: “Literature is the effort of man to indemnify himself from the wrongs of his conditions.” • Thornton Wilder: “Literature is the orchestration of platitudes.” • Thomas Mann: “Literature is the union of suffering with the instinct of form.” • Mark Twain: “A classic is something that everybody wants to have read and nobody wants to read.”