992 1650608982 Naqms19
992 1650608982 Naqms19
Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) implements the National Ambient Air
Quality Monitoring Programme (NAMP) through a network comprising 804
ambient air quality monitoring stations covering 344 cities/towns in 28
states and 6 union territories of the country as per the mandate under the
Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981 to collect, compile and
disseminate information on air quality.
Sh. V. K. Shukla,
Divisional Head, Air Quality Monitoring Division
Chapter Page
Topic
No. No.
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 01
1.1 Importance of good air quality 01
1.2 Air pollution 01
1.3 Air Pollution and Health 02
1.4 National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) 03
1.5 National Air Quality Monitoring Programme (N.A.M.P.) 03
1.5.1 Importance of air quality monitoring 03
1.5.2 Present status of NAMP 03
1.5.3 Objectives of NAMP 05
1.5.4 Parameters monitored under NAMP 05
1.5.5 Data Analysis, Processing and Limitations 05
1.5.6 Quality Assurance/Quality Control of Data and Management 06
i
Chapter Page
Topic
No. No.
CHAPTER 10 REFERENCES 89
ANNEXURES
Annexure 1 Air pollutants, their sources and effects 90
Annexure 2 National Ambient Air Quality Standards 97
Annexure 3 Levels of Sulphur Dioxide (SO2) in locations / Ambient Air Quality Monitoring 98
Stations under NAMP during 2019
Annexure 4 Levels of Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2) in locations / Ambient Air Quality Monitoring 112
Stations under NAMP during 2019
Annexure 5 Levels of Particulate Matter ≤ 10 µm (PM10) in locations / Ambient Air Quality 126
Monitoring Stations under NAMP during 2019
Annexure 6 Levels of Particulate Matter ≤ 2.5 µm (PM2.5) in locations / Ambient Air Quality 142
Monitoring Stations under NAMP during 2019
Annexure 7 List of Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Stations under National Ambient Air 148
Quality Monitoring Programme (NAMP)
Annexure 8 List of Non-Attainment Cities 155
ii
ABBREVIATION
Abbreviation Full Form
AAQMS Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Stations
AD Adequate Data (locations where ≥50 days of monitoring was done in a year)
As Arsenic
AQI Air Quality Index
B(a)P Benzo (a) Pyrene
C Critical pollution category
C6H6 Benzene
CNG Compressed Natural Gas
CO Carbon monoxide
CPA Critically Polluted Area
CPCB Central Pollution Control Board
CPCB RD CPCB Regional Directorate
E Exceeding NAAQS
EAQDES Environmental Air Quality Data Entry System
EDB Environmental Data Bank
ESA Ecologically Sensitive Area
EF Exceedence Factor
GRAP Graded Response Action Plan
H High pollution category
H2S Hydrogen Sulphide
ID Inadequate Data (locations < 50 days of monitoring was done in a year)
L Low pollution category
LPG Liquefied Petroleum Gas
M Moderate pollution category
NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standards
NAMP National Air Quality Monitoring Programme
NCR National Capital Region
ND No Data (Monitoring not done or data not received for the particular parameter)
NEERI National Environmental Engineering Research Institute
NH3 Ammonia
NHAI National Highways Authority of India
Ni Nickel
NM No Monitoring
NO2 Nitrogen Dioxide
O3 Ozone
OG Outgrowth
PAHs Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons
Pb Lead
PCCs Pollution Control Committees
PUC Pollution Under Control
PM10 Particulate Matter of size ≤ 10m
PM2.5 Particulate Matter of size ≤ 2.5m
QA/QC Quality Assurance / Quality Control
R/I/Ru/O Residential / Industrial / Rural / Other areas
RSPM Respiratory Suspended Particulate Matter
SO2 Sulphur Dioxide
SPCB State Pollution Control Boards
SUVs Sport Utility Vehicles
UA Urban Agglomeration
USEPA United States Environmental Protection Agency
UTs Union Territories
VOCs Volatile Organic Compounds
iii
Chapter1: Introduction - 2019
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Importance of good air quality Air pollution has been defined as the
presence in the atmosphere of any air
Air quality is a measure of the suitability of air for pollutant. Air pollutant is any solid liquid or
breathing by people, plants and animals. On gaseous substance present in the
average, a person inhales about 14,000 litres of air atmosphere in such concentration as may
every day. Therefore, poor air quality may affect the be or tend to be injurious to human beings or
quality of life now and for future generations by other living creatures or plants or property or
affecting the health, the environment, the economy environment.
and the city’s livability. The highest air pollution exposure
occurs in the indoor environment. Toxicity
Good outdoor air quality is fundamental to our well- can be defined as the relative ability of a
being. A healthy environment is therefore, an substance to cause adverse effects in living
essential aspect of the right to life, not only for organism. The concentration of pollutants in
human beings but also for other animals on the the air, water & soil that results from these
planet. Violation, therefore, of the right to healthy emissions influences the magnitude of
environment is potentially a violation of the basic human exposures through organs such as
right to life. the nose, mouth & skin.
CPCB initiated the National Ambient
Air Quality Monitoring Programme in 1984
and notified the revised National Ambient Air
1.2 Air pollution
Quality Standards in 2009. Presently, there
are 804 stations covering 344
The atmosphere of Earth is a layer cities/towns/villages in 28 states & 6 UT. Under
of gases surrounding the planet Earth that is NAMP, three air pollutants viz: SO2, NO2 &
retained by Earth's gravity. PM10 are monitored regularly at all location.
The atmosphere protects life on Earth by Monitoring is being carried out with the help
absorbing ultraviolet solar radiation, warming the of SPCBs, PCCs, NEERI & CPCB Head Office
surface through heat retention (greenhouse effect), & its Regional Directorates. The policy
and reducing temperature extremes between day decision in the country related to air pollution
and night (diurnal temperature variation). The are being taken based on the results
common name given to the atmospheric gases used obtained by CPCB through its air quality
in breathing and photosynthesis is air. By volume, monitoring programme.
dry air contains 78.09% nitrogen, 20.95% oxygen,
0.93% argon, 0.039% carbon dioxide, and small
amounts of other gases. (Figure 1.1). Rapid urbanization and industrialization has added other
elements/compounds to the pure air and thus caused the increase in pollution. In order to prevent,
control and abate air pollution, the Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act was enacted in 1981.
According to Section 2(b) of Air (Prevention and control of pollution) Act, 1981 ‘air pollution’ has been
defined as ‘the presence in the atmosphere of any air pollutant.’ As per Section 2(a) of Air (Prevention
and control of pollution) Act, 1981 ‘air pollutant’ has been defined as ‘any solid, liquid or gaseous
substance [(including noise)] present in the atmosphere in such concentration as may be or tend to be
injurious to human beings or other living creatures or plants or property or environment’. Therefore,
ambient air quality standard is developed as a policy guideline that regulates the effect of human
activity upon the environment so that pollutant emission into the air can be regulated. Standards may
specify a desired state or limit alterations.
Figure 1.1: Composition of dry air in the lower atmosphere of the Earth
1
Chapter1: Introduction - 2019
Air pollution is a major environmental health problem affecting the developing and the developed
countries alike. The effects of air pollution on health are very complex as there are many
different sources and their individual effects are synergistic and additive. It is not only the ambient air
quality in the cities but also the indoor air quality in the rural and the urban areas that are causing
concern. In fact, in the developing world the highest air pollution exposures occur in the indoor
environment. Air pollutants that are inhaled have serious impact on human health affecting the lungs
and the respiratory system; they are also taken up by the blood and circulated in the body. These
pollutants are also deposited on soil, plants, and in the water, further contributing to human exposure.
The sources and effects of some air pollutants is given in Annexure 1. Toxicity can be defined as the
relative ability of a substance to cause adverse effects in living organisms. This relative ability is
dependent upon several conditions.
Route of entry
Quantity or the dose of the substance determines whether the effects of the chemical are toxic,
nontoxic or beneficial.
Duration and frequency of exposure
Concentrations that are actually measured in the environment
Variations between different species (interspecies) and variations among members of the same
species (intra species)
To understand and control the effect of pollutants effectively, it is necessary to understand the pathway
from source to effect as measurement and control can occur at any of the places along the pathway.
However, effective control measurement can be taken only at the source.
The environmental exposure pathway provides an analytical framework to describe, in broad terms, the
connections between pollutant sources and human health outcomes. This framework begins with the
emission source, in this case a well pad and associated infrastructure, which emit a variety of
contaminants into the air, water, and soil. The concentrations of pollutants in the air, water, and soil that
result from these emissions influence the magnitude of human exposures through organs such as the
nose, mouth, and skin. Once the level of exposure is identified, it is then possible to estimate the dose,
or how much of the pollutant is ingested in a given period of time. The dose, in turn, determines the
health outcome.
2
Chapter1: Introduction - 2019
In order to combat air pollution, it is required to identify the pollutants, its source of emission and
investigate the effects of living and the environment. The Central Pollution Control Board has notified
the revised National Ambient Air Quality Standards Gazette of India, Extra-ordinary Part-II Section 3,
sub section (ii), dated Nov 18, 2009. The revised National Ambient Air Quality Standards is depicted in
Annexure 2.
Air pollutant, both indoor and outdoor, cause significant harm to health. Therefore, monitoring of
pollutants is important for effective air quality management. The Government monitors air quality in
different areas to find out how much pollution is in the air and make sure pollutant levels are meeting
health - based air quality standards. Knowing how much pollution is in the air in a certain area helps air
quality agencies know when and how to take action to protect public health. The Government uses its
air monitoring data to:
Central Pollution Control Board initiated National Ambient Air Quality Monitoring (NAAQM) programme
in the year 1984 with 7 stations at Agra and Anpara. Subsequently the programme was renamed as
National Air Quality Monitoring Programme (NAMP). Steadily the air quality monitoring network got
strengthened, in year 2019 the number of stations was raised to 804 covering 344
cities/towns/villages in 28 states and 6 Union Territories as on 31st December 2019 (Annexure).
The growth in number of stations under operation is given in Figure 1.3. Figure 1.4 shows the distribution
of cities with ambient air quality monitoring stations under NAMP.
Figure 1.3: Status of air quality monitoring stations in States & Union Territories during
No. of monitoring stations
1987
1992
1997
2002
2006
2007
2008
2008
2010
2011
2012
2012
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Years
3
Source of base map: District Maps of India, State Wise Districts of India. mapsofindia.com. https://in.pinterest.com/pin/223983781438626362/
The different coloured dots represent the approximate distribution of cities with manual ambient air quality stations under NAMP
Chapter1: Introduction - 2019
To check air quality of the country, Central Pollution Control Board initiated National Air Quality
Monitoring Programme (NAMP) under which three air pollutants viz., Sulphur Dioxide (SO 2), Nitrogen
Dioxide (NO2) and Particulate Matter size equal to or less than 10 micron (PM10), have been monitored
regularly at all the locations. Other parameters like PM2.5 (Particulate Matter having an aerodynamic
diameter less than or equal to 2.5 µm), Carbon monoxide (CO), Ammonia (NH 3), Lead (Pb), Ozone
(O3), Benzene (C6H6), Benzo(a)pyrene (BaP), Arsenic (As) and Nickel (Ni) are being monitored at
selected locations and are slowly being added to the monitoring network under NAMP.
The monitoring of meteorological parameters such as wind speed and direction, relative humidity and
temperature were also integrated with the monitoring of air quality and are monitored at selected
locations. The monitoring of regular parameters is carried out for 24 hours (4-hourly sampling for
gaseous pollutants and 8-hourly sampling for particulate matter) with a frequency of twice a week, to
have 104 observations in a year.
The monitoring under the NAMP is being carried out with the help of State Pollution Control Boards
(SPCB), Pollution Control Committees (PCC), National Environmental Engineering Research Institute
(NEERI), Nagpur and Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) Head Office and its Regional
Directorates. CPCB co-ordinates with these agencies to ensure uniformity, consistency of air quality
data and provides technical and financial support to them for operating the monitoring station.
The samples collected at the monitoring stations, following the guidelines of NAMP, are then analyzed
in the laboratories of the State Boards and different agencies as per the methods of measurement given
in the NAAQS. The data generated are entered into an online system of CPCB known as Environment
Air Quality Data Entry System (EAQDES) by respective SPCBs and PCCs. The data is then scrutinized
for outliers and gaps in input of data by CPCB. In case of any gaps, the matter is discussed with the
respective agencies and later the data is checked, scrutinized, compiled, processed and analyzed
statistically to get the information on the annual mean, standard deviation etc. of the pollutants and
payment is also made to the respective agencies. Figure 1.5 shows the data flow in NAMP.
5
Chapter1: Introduction - 2019
DATA ROADMAP
Data – by SPCB, PCC, NEERI
If absent in
EAQDES E-mail Hard copy soft
copy
then
entere
d
Entered in status book
AQMN-CPCB
VALIDATION
SPCB, PCC, NEERI SPCB, PCC, NEERI
query to update
Data quality & outliers Gaps in updation
Y Y
N N
As NAMP is being operated through various monitoring agencies, a large number of personnel and
equipments are involved in the sampling, chemical analyses, data reporting etc. This increases the
probability of personal biases reflecting in the data. Hence, it is pertinent to mention that this document
be referred keeping in view the above facts and the data be considered more as indicative rather than
absolute. The data presented in this report is average over the entire year as available.
The policy decisions in the country related to air pollution are being taken based on the results obtained
by CPCB through its air quality monitoring programme. It is therefore, of utmost important to keep a
quality check on the data generated so that the data is of acceptable quality. In order to ensure the
quality of data, CPCB is carrying out various exercises as follows:
Evaluation of Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Stations: Officials from CPCB Regional Directorates
regularly visit monitoring stations and monitoring laboratories to ensure proper methodology for
sampling and analysis. The findings of the inspection report are communicated to respective monitoring
agencies for implementation
Review Meetings: CPCB conducts review meetings with monitoring agencies to discuss various
problems related to monitoring activities and sort out the remedial measures
Training Program on Ambient Air Quality Monitoring and data entry: CPCB carries out training
program on ambient air quality monitoring and data entry in the Environmental Air Quality Data Entry
System (EAQDES) with an objective to improve quality of data generated under National Air Quality
Monitoring Programme (NAMP).
6
Chapter 2: Major findings – 2019
Out of 787 air quality monitoring stations from residential / industrial / rural and other area,
adequate data on annual average concentration (with 50 and more days of monitoring)
was received from 717 stations for SO2 and 718 stations for NO2 and 731 stations for
PM10 and 197 stations for PM2.5. In case of Ecologically Sensitive Area, out of a total of
17 stations, adequate data was received from 17 stations for SO2, NO2 and PM10 and 4
stations for PM2.5.
The detail of number of stations for which data was adequate or inadequate is given in
Table 2.1.
7
Chapter 2: Major findings – 2019
Out of 339 cities monitoring ambient air quality from residential / industrial / rural and other
area, adequate data on annual average concentration (with 50 and more observations of
monitoring) was received from 309 cities for SO2 and 310 cities for NO2 and 316 cities for
PM10 and 116 cities for PM2.5. In case of Ecologically Sensitive Area out of a total of 5
cities, adequate data was received from all 5 cities for SO2, NO2 and PM10 and 1 city for
PM2.5. The detail of number of cities for which data was adequate or inadequate is given
in Table 2.2.
Table 2.2: Details of data generated in monitoring cities (Annual)
Number of cities
Residential / industrial / Ecologically sensitive area
Data type
rural / other areas
SO2 NO2 PM10 PM2.5 SO2 NO2 PM10 PM2.5
Adequate data (AD) 309 310 316 116 5 5 5 1
Inadequate data (ID) 15 14 11 30 0 0 0 0
No data (ND) 15 15 12 0 0 0 0 0
Total monitored cities
(AD+ID+ND) 339 339 339 146 5 5 5 1
Key: Adequate data (taken for calculation), annual: cities where ≥50 days of monitoring was done in a year; Inadequate data (taken for calculation): cities < 50 days of
monitoring were done in a year;
500
300
200 138
91
100 72 61
3 3 5 17 4 17 4
0 0 0
0
Annually 24-hourly Annually 24-hourly
The percentage of locations exceeding national standards with respect to NO2, SO2, PM10
and PM2.5 is depicted in Figure 2.2. On the basis of annual average data, percentage of
monitoring stations / locations exceeding NAAQS with respect to NO 2 is 13%, PM10 is
79% and PM2.5 is 37% (Residential/Industrial/Rural area) and SO2 is 18%, NO2 is 29%,
PM10 and PM2.5 is 100% (Ecologically sensitive area). On the basis of 24-hourly average
data, percentage of monitoring stations / locations exceeding NAAQS with respect to SO2
is 0.4%, NO2 is 8%, PM10 is 78% and PM2.5 is 70% (Residential/Industrial/Rural area) and
PM10 and PM2.5 is 100% (Ecologically sensitive area).
9
Chapter 2: Major findings – 2019
80 70
60
37
40 29
18
20 13
8
0 0 0 0
0
Annually 24-hourly Annually 24-hourly
Number of cities exceeding NAAQS on the basis of annual average data is presented in
Table 2.5 and Figure 2.3. In residential/industrial/rural area, 28 cities for NO2, 246 cities
(for PM10) and 39 cities for PM2.5 exceed NAAQS. In ecologically sensitive area, 1 city for
SO2, 2 cities for NO2, 5 cities (for PM10) and 1 city for PM2.5 exceed NAAQS.
Table 2.5. Number of cities exceeding the NAAQS
(Based on annual average concentration)
Number of cities
Residential / industrial / Ecologically sensitive area
Data type
rural / other areas
SO2 NO2 PM10 PM2.5 SO2 NO2 PM10 PM2.5
Not exceeding NAAQS (NE) 309 282 70 77 4 3 0 0
Exceeding NAAQS (E) 0 28 246 39 1 2 5 1
Inadequate data (ID) 15 14 11 30 0 0 0 0
No data (ND) 15 15 12 0 0 0 0 0
Total monitored cities (NE, E,
ID & ND) 339 339 339 146 5 5 5 1
NAAQS (annual): SO2=50 µg/m3, NO2=40 µg/m3, PM10=60 µg/m3, PM2.5=40 µg/m3 (Residential / industrial / rural / other areas) and SO2=20 µg/m3,
NO2=30 µg/m3, PM10=60 µg/m3, PM2.5=40 µg/m3 (Ecologically sensitive area) Adequate data (taken for calculation), annual: cities where ≥50 days of
monitoring was done in a year; Inadequate data (taken for calculation): cities < 50 days of monitoring were done in a year;
10
Chapter 2: Major findings – 2019
150
100
39
50 28
0 1 2 5 1
0
Residential/industrial/rural/other area Ecologically sensitive area
The percentage of cities exceeding national standards with respect to NO2, SO2, PM10
and PM2.5 is depicted in Table 2.6 and Figure 2.4. On the basis of annual average data,
percentage of cities exceeding NAAQS with respect to NO2 is 9%, PM10 is 77% and PM2.5
is 33% (Residential/Industrial/Rural area) and SO2 is 20%, NO2 is 40%, PM10 and PM2.5
is 100% (Ecologically sensitive area).
120
SO2 NO2 PM10 PM2.5
100 100
100
78
80
60
40
40 34
20
20 9
0
0
Residential/industrial/rural/other area Ecologically sensitive area
The annual minimum values, maximum values and average in each city and the
exceedance of 24-hourly average for different pollutant is given below:
11
Chapter 2: Major findings – 2019
Table 2.7: Ambient air quality in cities of the country during 2019
Non-attainment cities
Coastal city
the year in the year
District
year
Zones
(24-hourly average)
(24-hourly average)
(24-hourly average)
(24-hourly average)
(24-hourly average)
(24-hourly average)
Exceeding NAAQS
Exceeding NAAQS
Exceeding NAAQS
Monitored
Monitored
Monitored
Maximum
Maximum
Maximum
Minimum
Minimum
Minimum
Average
Average
Average
Annual
Annual
Annual
Anantapur S Anantapur NAC 4 4 15 5 427 0 9 26 15 427 0 16 138 67 429 51
Chitoor S Chittoor NAC 5 2 19 5 516 0 9 105 19 517 2 17 117 54 519 6
Eluru S West Godavari NAC 4 4 6 5 432 0 15 30 19 432 0 41 102 63 432 1
Guntur S Guntur NAC 4 4 6 5 402 0 16 25 19 402 0 29 192 53 403 3
YS Rajshekhara
Kadapa Reddy/Kadapa/Cu NAC 5 4 19 5 537 0 9 27 15 537 0 17 142 53 537 2
S ddapah
Andhra Pradesh
NE
Bongaigaon NE Bongaigaon 2 3 12 4 156 0 10 20 12 156 0 21 112 44 156 1
Daranga NE Chirang 1 4 11 7 94 0 10 21 14 94 0 17 134 53 94 11
Assam
12
Chapter 2: Major findings – 2019
SO2 NO2 PM10
No. of
No. of No. of
Non-attainment cities
Coastal city
the year in the year
District
year
Zones
(24-hourly average)
(24-hourly average)
(24-hourly average)
(24-hourly average)
(24-hourly average)
(24-hourly average)
Exceeding NAAQS
Exceeding NAAQS
Exceeding NAAQS
Monitored
Monitored
Monitored
Maximum
Maximum
Maximum
Minimum
Minimum
Minimum
Average
Average
Average
Annual
Annual
Annual
Margherita NE Tinsukia 1 4 9 6 91 0 9 18 12 91 0 16 93 48 91 0
Nagaon NE Nagaon NAC 1 5 10 7 97 0 11 20 15 97 0 35 269 105 97 42
Nalbari NE Nalbari NAC 1 4 10 7 77 0 11 18 14 77 0 37 184 87 77 25
North Lakhimpur NE Lakhimpur 1 5 10 7 86 0 11 17 14 86 0 18 131 56 86 12
Silchar NE Sibsagar NAC 2 5 9 7 149 0 8 14 11 149 0 32 58 46 149 0
Sivasagar NE Cachar NAC 2 4 9 6 205 0 9 18 13 205 0 16 116 55 205 2
Tezpur NE Sonitpur 1 6 10 7 86 0 11 20 15 86 0 24 189 98 86 41
Tinsukia NE Tinsukia 3 4 9 6 290 0 6 18 12 290 0 15 100 45 290 0
Begusarai E Begusarai 1 9 19 12 104 0 16 39 22 104 0 37 164 117 104 77
Darbhanga E Darbhanga 1 12 22 15 105 0 18 32 24 105 0 35 267 123 105 67
Gaya E Gaya NAC 1 6 15 11 104 0 15 34 21 104 0 13 145 71 104 21
Bihar
N
Bilaspur C Bilaspur 1 4 7 6 91 0 10 14 12 91 0 28 64 47 91 0
Chhattisgarh
Co 1 8 25 16 97 0 9 24 17 97 0 22 87 65 97 0
Daman & Diu
13
Chapter 2: Major findings – 2019
SO2 NO2 PM10
No. of
No. of No. of
Non-attainment cities
Coastal city
the year in the year
District
year
Zones
(24-hourly average)
(24-hourly average)
(24-hourly average)
(24-hourly average)
(24-hourly average)
(24-hourly average)
Exceeding NAAQS
Exceeding NAAQS
Exceeding NAAQS
Monitored
Monitored
Monitored
Maximum
Maximum
Maximum
Minimum
Minimum
Minimum
Average
Average
Average
Annual
Annual
Annual
Delhi
Delhi Delhi CPA MP NAC 10 2 23 5 962 0 11 209 70 962 276 20 836 199 961 741
N
Amona W North Goa Co 1 9 12 11 105 0 13 16 14 105 0 32 166 72 105 26
Assanora W North Goa Co 1 9 12 11 104 0 13 16 14 104 0 22 129 57 104 5
Bicholim W North Goa Co 1 9 12 11 103 0 13 17 14 103 0 32 169 63 103 12
Codli W North Goa Co 1 9 12 10 103 0 11 17 14 103 0 30 160 60 103 7
Cuncolim W South Goa Co 1 9 13 11 102 0 13 17 14 102 0 32 182 80 102 31
Honda W North Goa Co 1 9 12 11 104 0 13 16 14 104 0 30 112 63 104 3
Kundaim W North Goa Co 1 9 13 11 104 0 13 17 14 104 0 21 138 62 104 12
Mapusa W North Goa Co 1 2 7 3 90 0 5 31 10 90 0 14 268 72 90 13
Goa
Non-attainment cities
Coastal city
the year in the year
District
year
Zones
(24-hourly average)
(24-hourly average)
(24-hourly average)
(24-hourly average)
(24-hourly average)
(24-hourly average)
Exceeding NAAQS
Exceeding NAAQS
Exceeding NAAQS
Monitored
Monitored
Monitored
Maximum
Maximum
Maximum
Minimum
Minimum
Minimum
Average
Average
Average
Annual
Annual
Annual
Marhi N Chamba 1 2 2 2 12 0 5 11 5 12 0 18 60 35 12 0
Nalagarh N Solan NAC 1 2 2 2 113 0 18 56 25 114 0 68 251 125 120 86
Paonta Sahib N Sirmaur NAC 2 2 8 3 285 0 9 21 14 285 0 17 188 83 284 69
Parwanoo N Solan IA NAC 2 2 4 2 254 0 5 34 6 255 0 29 192 64 269 2
Shimla N Shimla 2 2 7 2 203 0 11 34 26 202 0 19 137 59 213 5
Sunder Nagar N Mandi NAC 2 2 2 2 250 0 5 26 9 250 0 5 193 72 251 30
Una N Una 2 2 3 2 17 0 7 8 7 17 0 30 79 61 261 0
Vashisht N Kullu 1 2 4 2 44 0 5 11 5 44 0 26 96 48 44 0
Jammu N Jammu NAC 3 2 5 3 201 0 6 26 17 201 0 70 186 139 272 262
Jammu &
Kashmir
Non-attainment cities
Coastal city
the year in the year
District
year
Zones
(24-hourly average)
(24-hourly average)
(24-hourly average)
(24-hourly average)
(24-hourly average)
(24-hourly average)
Exceeding NAAQS
Exceeding NAAQS
Exceeding NAAQS
Monitored
Monitored
Monitored
Maximum
Maximum
Maximum
Minimum
Minimum
Minimum
Average
Average
Average
Annual
Annual
Annual
Mangalore S Dakshina Kannada Co CPA 1 5 9 7 92 0 9 11 10 92 0 23 80 47 92 0
Mysore S Mysuru 2 2 12 6 112 0 11 34 13 112 0 30 70 52 110 0
Raichur S Raichur IA 1 2 7 2 77 0 5 27 11 77 0 17 186 74 77 16
Shimaga S Shivamogga 1 3 50 24 100 0 5 14 6 100 0 11 79 33 100 0
Timukuru S Tumakuru 1 2 2 2 103 0 17 42 27 103 0 41 145 75 103 7
Alappuzha S Alappuzha Co 3 2 5 2 203 0 5 10 5 203 0 23 84 56 203 0
Kochi S Ernakulam Co CPA MP 8 2 12 3 734 0 5 43 14 734 0 11 181 46 729 10
Kollam S Kollam Co MP 2 2 5 3 220 0 5 9 6 220 0 32 55 45 220 0
Kottayam S Kottayam Co 2 2 4 3 238 0 12 14 13 238 0 21 52 35 238 0
Kozhikode S Kozhikode Co MP 2 2 2 2 172 0 5 13 5 170 0 12 119 44 170 10
Kerala
Non-attainment cities
Coastal city
the year in the year
District
year
Zones
(24-hourly average)
(24-hourly average)
(24-hourly average)
(24-hourly average)
(24-hourly average)
(24-hourly average)
Exceeding NAAQS
Exceeding NAAQS
Exceeding NAAQS
Monitored
Monitored
Monitored
Maximum
Maximum
Maximum
Minimum
Minimum
Minimum
Average
Average
Average
Annual
Annual
Annual
Akola W Akola NAC 3 11 18 14 427 0 12 19 14 427 0 60 81 68 427 0
Ambernath W Thane Co 1 12 47 27 131 0 21 129 66 131 33 26 330 118 131 69
Amravati W Amravati NAC 3 8 24 14 461 0 9 25 15 461 0 54 136 89 461 145
Aurangabad W Aurangabad CPA MP NAC 4 6 24 13 362 0 10 68 36 362 0 43 104 74 350 1
Badlapur W Thane Co NAC 1 11 58 27 187 0 19 120 60 187 32 17 319 108 187 81
Bhiwandi W Thane Co 3 22 44 32 503 0 31 69 44 503 0 21 85 69 503 0
Chandrapur W Chandrapur CPA NAC 6 3 7 4 651 0 10 85 29 651 1 23 357 133 651 398
Dombivali W Thane Co CPA 1 11 54 27 190 0 20 120 60 190 29 17 295 106 190 89
Jalgaon W Jalgaon NAC 3 9 16 12 461 0 27 38 33 461 0 46 93 60 420 0
Jalna W Jalna NAC 2 8 12 10 276 0 33 52 40 276 0 75 120 97 276 64
Maharashtra
Non-attainment cities
Coastal city
the year in the year
District
year
Zones
(24-hourly average)
(24-hourly average)
(24-hourly average)
(24-hourly average)
(24-hourly average)
(24-hourly average)
Exceeding NAAQS
Exceeding NAAQS
Exceeding NAAQS
Monitored
Monitored
Monitored
Maximum
Maximum
Maximum
Minimum
Minimum
Minimum
Average
Average
Average
Annual
Annual
Annual
Tura NE West Garo Hills 1 2 4 3 116 0 5 16 12 116 0 14 40 31 116 0
Umiam / Umsning NE East Khasi Hills 1 2 6 3 120 0 5 15 12 120 0 17 136 94 120 66
Aizawl NE Aizawl 5 2 2 2 506 0 5 21 8 507 0 10 211 48 507 39
Mizoram
Talcher Anugul CPA NAC 2 6 14 10 208 0 23 35 28 208 0 35 209 106 208 109
18
Chapter 2: Major findings – 2019
SO2 NO2 PM10
No. of
No. of No. of
Non-attainment cities
Coastal city
the year in the year
District
year
Zones
(24-hourly average)
(24-hourly average)
(24-hourly average)
(24-hourly average)
(24-hourly average)
(24-hourly average)
Exceeding NAAQS
Exceeding NAAQS
Exceeding NAAQS
Monitored
Monitored
Monitored
Maximum
Maximum
Maximum
Minimum
Minimum
Minimum
Average
Average
Average
Annual
Annual
Annual
Karaikal S Karaikal Co 3 2 3 2 262 0 5 11 5 261 0 17 118 41 261 1
Puducherry
S
Aligarh (Jagraon) Ludhiana 1 4 12 6 103 0 9 37 17 103 0 22 199 73 106 19
N
Amritsar N Amritsar MP NAC 2 11 19 13 122 0 25 46 34 122 0 46 366 170 122 111
Aspal Khurd
Barnala 1 4 8 5 123 0 9 18 12 124 0 64 213 107 127 69
(Tapa) N
Bara Pind
Jalandhar 1 4 11 7 83 0 10 26 20 83 0 53 338 150 85 60
(Goraya) N
Bhatinda N Bathinda 1 2 8 5 81 0 5 21 13 84 0 53 194 106 90 47
Binjon
Hoshiarpur 1 4 24 7 80 0 9 19 14 80 0 23 249 102 80 39
(Garshankar) N
Bishanpura
Ludhiana 1 4 20 10 93 0 9 39 21 93 0 19 374 137 100 65
(Payal) N
Changal (Sangrur) N Sangrur 1 4 7 5 107 0 6 26 13 106 0 53 240 105 122 52
Punjab
Chowkimann
Ludhiana 1 4 12 7 102 0 9 32 19 102 0 20 170 68 108 16
(Jagraon) N
Dera Baba Nanak N Pathankot NAC 1 3 9 7 68 0 11 17 13 67 0 25 199 70 68 7
Ajitgarh/Sahibzad
Dera Bassi NAC 2 4 8 6 220 0 9 26 13 221 0 41 174 97 220 83
N a Ajit Singh Nagar
Fatehpur
Patiala 1 4 7 5 38 0 10 13 11 38 0 79 107 95 38 11
(Samana) N
Gobindgarh N Fatehgarh Sahib CPA NAC 3 5 9 7 389 0 13 98 36 389 1 84 238 142 391 364
Guru Ki Dhab
Faridkot 1 2 8 5 22 0 7 26 13 22 0 74 212 124 22 17
(Kotkapura) N
Jaito Sarja
Gurdaspur 1 4 7 6 37 0 11 18 14 37 0 21 109 60 37 3
(Batala) N
Jalandhar N Jalandhar IA NAC 4 5 24 11 276 0 12 49 24 275 0 35 329 137 276 201
Khanna N Ludhiana NAC 2 5 64 11 229 0 7 73 26 228 0 45 368 165 231 200
19
Chapter 2: Major findings – 2019
SO2 NO2 PM10
No. of
No. of No. of
Non-attainment cities
Coastal city
the year in the year
District
year
Zones
(24-hourly average)
(24-hourly average)
(24-hourly average)
(24-hourly average)
(24-hourly average)
(24-hourly average)
Exceeding NAAQS
Exceeding NAAQS
Exceeding NAAQS
Monitored
Monitored
Monitored
Maximum
Maximum
Maximum
Minimum
Minimum
Minimum
Average
Average
Average
Annual
Annual
Annual
Kharaori (Sirhind) N Fatehgarh Sahib 1 4 8 6 126 0 10 29 13 126 0 68 190 100 128 45
Kotladoom
Amritsar 1 5 8 7 62 0 11 18 13 62 0 49 395 128 62 35
(Ajnala) N
Lakho ke Behram
Ferozpur 1 3 6 4 11 0 5 12 8 11 0 73 169 114 11 7
(Ferozpur) N
Ludhiana N Ludhiana CPA MP NAC 4 5 64 12 511 0 5 86 26 514 1 33 498 153 522 407
Mrar Kalan
Muktsar 1 4 9 5 40 0 10 26 14 42 0 55 228 111 66 35
(Muktsar) N
Nawashahar /
Mukandpur
Shahid Bhagat 1 5 12 8 78 0 13 26 17 78 0 58 247 134 78 57
(Nawashahar)
N Singh Nagar
Mureedke
Gurdaspur 1 4 10 7 98 0 8 18 12 98 0 21 142 87 98 45
(Batala) N
Naudhrani
Sangrur 1 4 8 5 106 0 9 25 13 104 0 55 198 108 127 69
(Malerkotla) N
Naya Nangal N Ropar/Rupnagar NAC 2 4 8 6 196 0 9 23 12 203 0 39 159 90 201 57
Patiala N Patiala NAC 2 4 8 5 264 0 9 30 12 260 0 74 197 102 263 85
Peer Mohammad
Fazilka 1 4 6 5 26 0 10 13 12 23 0 69 133 102 41 23
(Jalalabad) N
Poohli (Bhatinda) N Bathinda 1 4 7 5 21 0 10 26 15 23 0 64 337 114 57 29
Qila Bharian
Sangrur 1 4 8 5 112 0 10 27 13 112 0 49 178 104 135 69
(Sangrur) N
Rakhra (Patiala) N Patiala 1 5 7 5 53 0 11 13 12 53 0 64 129 98 53 24
Rohila (Samrala) N Ludhiana 1 5 19 10 120 0 9 42 20 120 0 21 575 159 123 94
Tirathpur
Amritsar 1 5 8 7 58 0 10 14 13 58 0 25 202 93 58 18
(Amritsar I) N
Alwar W Alwar NAC 3 6 18 12 306 0 22 45 34 306 0 72 349 172 306 286
Bharatpur W Bharatpur 3 6 12 8 300 0 5 38 26 298 0 61 561 200 296 278
Rajasthan
Bhiwadi W Alwar CPA 3 6 63 26 236 0 12 79 46 236 0 101 442 255 238 238
Chittorgarh W Chittorgarh 3 4 20 7 296 0 14 91 26 296 3 31 311 142 292 207
Jaipur W Jaipur IA MP NAC 9 4 31 7 933 0 5 72 27 933 0 34 498 141 933 739
Jodhpur W Jodhpur CPA MP NAC 9 3 23 7 650 0 10 58 26 650 0 46 973 240 644 588
Kota W Kota MP NAC 6 5 13 7 626 0 18 45 24 626 0 19 382 129 626 421
20
Chapter 2: Major findings – 2019
SO2 NO2 PM10
No. of
No. of No. of
Non-attainment cities
Coastal city
the year in the year
District
year
Zones
(24-hourly average)
(24-hourly average)
(24-hourly average)
(24-hourly average)
(24-hourly average)
(24-hourly average)
Exceeding NAAQS
Exceeding NAAQS
Exceeding NAAQS
Monitored
Monitored
Monitored
Maximum
Maximum
Maximum
Minimum
Minimum
Minimum
Average
Average
Average
Annual
Annual
Annual
Udaipur W Udaipur NAC 3 3 26 11 312 0 11 53 31 312 0 55 258 156 312 268
Chungthang NE North Sikkim 1 3 10 5 90 0 5 5 5 90 0 16 47 28 90 0
Gangtok NE East Sikkim 2 4 10 6 77 0 5 25 10 77 0 21 83 49 75 0
Mangan NE North Sikkim 1 3 7 5 101 0 5 8 5 101 0 13 62 34 101 0
Sikkim
21
Chapter 2: Major findings – 2019
SO2 NO2 PM10
No. of
No. of No. of
Non-attainment cities
Coastal city
the year in the year
District
year
Zones
(24-hourly average)
(24-hourly average)
(24-hourly average)
(24-hourly average)
(24-hourly average)
(24-hourly average)
Exceeding NAAQS
Exceeding NAAQS
Exceeding NAAQS
Monitored
Monitored
Monitored
Maximum
Maximum
Maximum
Minimum
Minimum
Minimum
Average
Average
Average
Annual
Annual
Annual
Tripura
NE
Agra N Agra CPA MP NAC 6 2 35 4 805 0 5 71 24 863 0 13 509 186 850 613
Allahabad N Allahabad MP NAC 5 2 19 5 425 0 7 88 42 490 1 80 488 222 490 481
Anpara N Sonbhadra NAC 2 10 22 17 192 0 19 32 29 192 0 41 287 171 204 189
Baghpat N Baghpat 2 6 37 11 189 0 10 57 21 187 0 73 480 171 188 182
Bareily N Bareilly NAC 2 10 62 27 214 0 18 65 32 214 0 79 679 200 214 193
Firozabad N Firozabad IA NAC 3 6 12 8 311 0 17 42 31 311 0 54 488 214 309 267
Gajraula N Amroha NAC 2 8 50 25 185 0 14 67 38 186 0 96 421 229 183 182
Ghaziabad N Ghaziabad CPA MP NAC 4 5 35 13 351 0 10 85 35 351 2 46 694 208 351 324
Gorakpur N Gorakhpur 3 2 62 22 286 0 10 80 35 286 1 103 443 294 286 286
Gautam Buddha
Greater Noida 2 6 48 12 176 0 9 87 26 176 2 91 501 190 176 173
N Nagar
Uttar Pradesh
22
Chapter 2: Major findings – 2019
SO2 NO2 PM10
No. of
No. of No. of
Non-attainment cities
Coastal city
the year in the year
District
year
Zones
(24-hourly average)
(24-hourly average)
(24-hourly average)
(24-hourly average)
(24-hourly average)
(24-hourly average)
Exceeding NAAQS
Exceeding NAAQS
Exceeding NAAQS
Monitored
Monitored
Monitored
Maximum
Maximum
Maximum
Minimum
Minimum
Minimum
Average
Average
Average
Annual
Annual
Annual
Dehradun N Dehradun NAC 3 21 28 25 206 0 26 32 29 207 0 93 260 167 207 205
Haldwani N Nainital 1 5 32 8 103 0 21 46 28 103 0 92 218 111 103 97
Uttarakhand
North 24
Barrackpore NAC 3 2 21 8 310 0 15 53 28 310 0 69 445 115 310 224
E Parganas
South 24
Baruipur 1 2 16 7 104 0 28 58 40 104 0 28 270 87 104 31
E Parganas
Bolpur E Birbhum 1 2 15 2 104 0 15 33 20 104 0 62 140 98 104 49
Chinsura E Hooghly 1 2 18 7 104 0 15 47 26 104 0 53 324 112 104 61
Coochbehar E Cooch Behar 2 2 14 7 208 0 13 49 33 208 0 44 179 79 208 37
Dankuni E Hooghly 1 2 18 7 104 0 13 44 25 104 0 58 349 107 104 56
Darjeeling E Darjeeling 1 2 10 5 104 0 13 45 30 104 0 42 85 57 104 0
Paschim
Durgapur IA NAC 4 2 22 14 415 0 20 56 41 415 0 87 272 173 415 410
E Bardhaman
Paschim
Ghatal 1 2 22 10 107 0 30 48 39 107 0 39 278 93 107 35
E Medinipore
Haldia E Purba Medinipore Co CPA NAC 4 2 22 9 424 0 28 50 38 424 0 33 280 86 424 119
23
Chapter 2: Major findings – 2019
SO2 NO2 PM10
No. of
No. of No. of
Non-attainment cities
Coastal city
the year in the year
District
year
Zones
(24-hourly average)
(24-hourly average)
(24-hourly average)
(24-hourly average)
(24-hourly average)
(24-hourly average)
Exceeding NAAQS
Exceeding NAAQS
Exceeding NAAQS
Monitored
Monitored
Monitored
Maximum
Maximum
Maximum
Minimum
Minimum
Minimum
Average
Average
Average
Annual
Annual
Annual
Howrah E Howrah CPA NAC 4 3 26 12 420 0 30 57 40 420 0 44 453 174 420 297
Jalpaiguri E Jalpaiguri 1 2 12 6 106 0 14 49 33 106 0 50 131 76 106 0
Jhargram E Jhargram 1 3 19 9 105 0 29 48 37 105 0 36 169 79 105 25
Kalimpong E Kalimpong 1 2 10 6 104 0 13 47 31 104 0 42 95 58 104 0
Kalyani E Nadia 1 2 20 7 104 0 15 49 26 104 0 75 534 113 104 62
Paschim
Kharagpur 1 5 24 13 106 0 31 52 41 106 0 46 651 194 106 95
E Medinipore
211 211
Kolkata Kolkata MP NAC 21 2 37 8 0 5 206 42 2118 36 14 610 104 803
E 5 5
Krishnanagar E Nadia 1 2 15 7 104 0 15 44 26 104 0 72 316 107 104 55
North 24
Madhyamgram 1 2 20 8 103 0 11 50 27 103 0 57 567 118 103 69
E Parganas
Malda E Malda 1 2 13 7 103 0 14 49 34 105 0 54 218 101 105 37
Paschim
Medinipur Co 1 4 18 9 107 0 30 47 38 107 0 35 181 80 107 20
E Medinipore
Purulia E Purulia 1 2 13 2 104 0 14 32 20 104 0 55 135 95 104 42
Raigunj E Uttar Dinajpur 1 2 28 7 104 0 13 48 32 104 0 46 160 78 104 16
Rampurhat E Birbhum 1 2 12 2 104 0 15 33 20 104 0 58 158 102 104 53
Ranaghat E Nadia 1 2 17 7 104 0 15 57 26 104 0 65 409 112 104 58
Raniganj E Uttar Dinajpur NAC 3 7 20 15 312 0 19 54 44 312 0 78 263 186 312 308
Rishra E Hooghly 1 2 21 8 104 0 11 51 27 104 0 51 574 118 104 71
Sankrail E Howrah 4 2 34 10 418 0 29 50 38 418 0 31 339 110 418 177
Siliguri E Darjeeling 1 2 13 6 105 0 17 46 33 104 0 46 198 80 105 21
Suri E Birbhum 1 2 15 2 104 0 15 34 20 104 0 62 140 98 104 47
Tamluk E Purba Medinipore Co 1 3 23 10 106 0 30 59 38 106 0 43 431 108 106 37
Tribeni E Hooghly 1 2 16 7 104 0 12 43 25 104 0 43 506 114 104 62
Uluberia E Howrah 1 3 23 10 104 0 30 50 39 104 0 36 255 94 104 37
NB. Alwar in Rajasthan (Aravali Hills), Agra, Firozabad, Mathura in Uttar Pradesh (Taj-Trapezium), Dehradun in Uttarakhand (Doon valley) are cities in Ecologically sensitive area. The rest
fall under Residential / industrial / rural / other areas; NAAQS (annual): SO2=50 µg/m3, NO2=40 µg/m3, PM10=60 µg/m3, PM2.5 = 40 µg/m3 (Residential / industrial / rural / other areas) and
SO2=20 µg/m3, NO2=30 µg/m3, PM10=60 µg/m3, PM2.5 = 40 µg/m3 (Ecologically sensitive area)
NAAQS (24-hourly): SO2=80 µg/m3, NO2=80 µg/m3, PM10=100 µg/m3, PM2.5 = 60 µg/m3 (Residential / industrial / rural / other areas and Ecologically sensitive area)
RIRuO-Residential / industrial / rural / other areas, ESA- Ecologically sensitive area, N-North, E-East, W-West, S-South, NE-North East, C-Central, Co-Coastal cities, I-industrial, MP-
milliion plus cities, NAC- Non attainment cities on the basis of 2014- 18 data. SO2-Sulphur Dioxide, NO2-Nitrogen Dioxide, PM10-Particulate matter of aerodynamic size ≤10 micrometer in
diameter, Min-Minimum 24-hourly average concentration in the year, Max-Maximum 24-hourly average concentration in the year. Names within parentheses are the tehsils of the rural areas.
24
Chapter 2: Major findings – 2019
Table 2.8: Ambient air quality in cities with respect to PM2.5 during 2019
PM2.5
Industrial (CEPI)
Concentration in µg/m3 observations in
Million plus
Coastal city
the year
District
Zones
State
NAC
(24-hourly average)
(24-hourly average)
Exceeding NAAQS
Monitored
Maximum
Minimum
Average
Annual
Anantapur S Anantapur NAC 4 10 65 30 206 1
Chitoor S Chittoor NAC 3 7 66 26 238 1
Eluru S West Godavari NAC 2 12 33 19 84 0
Guntur S Guntur NAC 4 11 48 23 250 0
YS Rajshekhara
Kadapa Reddy/Kadapa/Cu NAC 3 8 69 26 205 1
S ddapah
Andhra Pradesh
Kamrup
Guwahati NAC 3 10 51 27 70 0
Metropolitan
NE
Begusarai E Begusarai 1 19 114 55 104 36
Bihar
Co 1 10 43 25 97 0
Daman & Diu
25
Chapter 2: Major findings – 2019
PM2.5
Industrial (CEPI)
Concentration in µg/m3 observations in
Million plus
Coastal city
the year
District
Zones
State
NAC
(24-hourly average)
(24-hourly average)
Exceeding NAAQS
Monitored
Maximum
Minimum
Average
Annual
Codli W North Goa Co 1 14 81 32 103 7
Cuncolim W South Goa Co 1 15 77 38 102 13
Honda W North Goa Co 1 15 69 32 104 7
Kundaim W North Goa Co 1 12 83 31 104 8
Margao W South Goa Co 1 15 78 30 102 7
Panaji W North Goa Co 1 4 166 50 60 15
Ponda W North Goa Co 1 16 85 33 105 9
Sanguem W South Goa Co 1 15 68 29 103 3
Tilamol W South Goa Co 1 15 90 35 102 9
Tuem W North Goa Co 1 14 68 29 104 3
Usgao W North Goa Co 1 17 99 33 96 3
Vasco W South Goa Co 1 5 114 41 53 8
Ahmedabad W Ahmedabad CPA MP NAC 9 16 130 37 783 134
Anklesvar W Bharuch Co CPA 2 21 70 36 176 11
Jamnagar W Jamnagar Co 1 14 85 34 87 12
Gujarat
N
Bagalkote S Bagalkot 1 10 68 29 40 2
Bangalore S Bengaluru Urban MP NAC 8 10 74 32 467 8
Belgaum S Belagavi 1 7 90 38 50 9
Bidar S Bidar IA 1 5 89 39 51 9
Bijapur S Vijayapura 1 15 76 41 16 2
Devanagere S Davanagere NAC 1 3 35 16 85 0
Gulburga S Kalaburagi NAC 1 23 102 46 35 9
Karnataka
Hassan S Hassan 1 18 36 25 78 0
Hubli-Dharwad S Dharwad NAC 2 12 38 22 209 0
Kolar S Kolar 1 12 53 28 31 0
Mangalore S Dakshina Kannada Co CPA 1 15 59 42 14 0
Mysore S Mysuru 1 18 41 26 108 0
Raichur S Raichur IA 1 3 34 14 43 0
Shimaga Shivamogga 1 3 24 12 62 0
S
26
Chapter 2: Major findings – 2019
PM2.5
Industrial (CEPI)
Concentration in µg/m3 observations in
Million plus
Coastal city
the year
District
Zones
State
NAC
(24-hourly average)
(24-hourly average)
Exceeding NAAQS
Monitored
Maximum
Minimum
Average
Annual
Kochi S Ernakulam Co CPA MP 1 4 61 32 43 2
Kerala
W
Manipur
27
Chapter 2: Major findings – 2019
PM2.5
Industrial (CEPI)
Concentration in µg/m3 observations in
Million plus
Coastal city
the year
District
Zones
State
NAC
(24-hourly average)
(24-hourly average)
Exceeding NAAQS
Monitored
Maximum
Minimum
Average
Annual
Chennai S Chennai Co MP 7 10 76 36 257 1
Coimbatore S Coimbatore MP 3 9 122 37 81 5
Cuddalore S Cuddalore Co CPA 3 24 38 32 112 0
Tamilnadu
Madurai S Madurai MP 3 12 62 26 46 1
Mettur S Salem IA 2 15 71 37 30 2
Salem S Salem 1 13 80 40 14 2
Trichy S Tiruchirappalli MP NAC 5 19 82 46 167 37
Tuticorin S Thoothukudi Co NAC 3 13 44 23 95 0
Adilabad S Adilabad 1 40 50 45 90 0
Hyderabad S Hyderabad MP NAC 8 4 148 40 558 103
Khammam S Khammam 1 34 56 45 24 0
Telangana
Gautam Buddha
Greater Noida 2 48 293 94 192 169
N Nagar
Hapur N Hapur 2 16 398 111 146 95
Kanpur N Kanpur Nagar CPA MP NAC 1 3 259 66 88 38
Muzaffarnagar N Muzaffarnagar 2 11 170 87 194 133
Gautam Buddha
Noida CPA NAC 4 12 462 105 387 317
N Nagar
Paschim
Asansol CPA MP NAC 1 46 141 81 104 98
E Bardhaman
Barrackpore E North 24 Parganas NAC 1 47 114 66 104 60
Darjeeling E Darjeeling 1 13 43 24 104 0
West Bengal
Paschim
Durgapur IA NAC 1 53 127 73 103 91
E Bardhaman
Haldia E Purba Medinipore Co CPA NAC 1 10 121 35 106 17
Howrah E Howrah CPA NAC 2 20 177 68 209 82
Kalyani E Nadia 1 43 121 60 104 39
Kolkata E Kolkata MP NAC 4 13 181 56 416 144
Sankrail E Howrah 1 21 51 31 10 0
Siliguri E Darjeeling 1 11 68 32 105 2
Note:
Alwar in Rajasthan (Aravali Hills), Agra, Firozabad, Mathura in Uttar Pradesh (Taj-Trapezium), Dehradun in Uttarakhand (Doon valley) are cities in Ecologically sensitive
area. The rest fall under Residential / industrial / rural / other areas; NAAQS (annual): SO2=50 µg/m3, NO2=40 µg/m3, PM10=60 µg/m3, PM2.5 = 40 µg/m3 (Residential /
industrial / rural / other areas) and SO 2=20 µg/m3, NO2=30 µg/m3, PM10=60 µg/m3, PM2.5= 40 µg/m3 ( (Ecologically sensitive area); NAAQS (24-hourly): SO2=80 µg/m3,
NO2=80 µg/m3, PM10=100 µg/m3, PM2.5= 60 µg/m3 (Residential / industrial / rural / other areas and Ecologically sensitive area)
RIRuO-Residential / industrial / rural / other areas, ESA- Ecologically sensitive area, N-North, E-East, W-West, S-South, NE-North East, C-Central, Co-Coastal cities, I-
industrial, MP-milliion plus cities, NAC- Non attainment cities on the basis of 2014- 18 data. PM2.5-Particulate matter of aerodynamic size ≤ 2.5 micrometer in diameter;
Names within parentheses are the tehsils of the rural areas.
28
Chapter 2: Major findings – 2019
National average concentration with 90th percentile and National average concentration
10th percentile for SO2, NO2 and PM10 is depicted in with 90th percentile & 10th percentile for
Figure 2.5. National average of SO2 concentration has SO2, NO2 & PM10 indicated that SO2
decreased over the years indicating that there has been concentration has decreased over the
a decline in SO2 levels (Figure 2.5a). Decreasing trend
may be due to various interventions that have taken years; NO2 concentration remained
place in recent years such as reduction in sulphur in stable over the years with a slight
diesel, use of cleaner fuel such as CNG in metro cities, decrease in last few years despite increase
change in domestic fuel from coal to LPG etc. National in sources like vehicles. PM10
average of NO2 concentration has remained stable over concentration revealed a fluctuating trend
the years with a slight decrease in last three years
despite increase in sources like vehicles (Figure 2.5b). and a stable trend was observed in PM2.5.
The reason for this may be various intervention measures that have taken place such as improvement in
vehicle technology and other vehicular pollution control measures like alternate fuel etc. National average
of PM10 concentration shows fluctuating trend exceeding the NAAQS (Figure 2.5c). The reasons being
emission from gensets, small scale industries, biomass incineration, suspension of traffic dust, natural dust,
commercial and domestic use of fuel and vehicular emission etc. PM2.5 revealed a stable trend with decline
in 2019 (Figure 2.5d).
Figure 2.5: National mean concentration of different locations that fall under 10th
and 90th Percentile for SO2, NO2, PM10 and PM2.5
50
SO2
90% of Sites have concentrations below this line
40
Concentration (µg/m3)
30
Average
20
10% of Sites have concentrations below this line
10
0
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
a. Year
NO2
60
90% of Sites have concentrations below this line
50
Concentration (µg/m3)
40
Average
30
20
10% of Sites have concentrations below this
10
0 29
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
b. Year
Chapter 2: Major findings – 2019
PM10
250
200
150
Average
100
0
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
c. Year
s PM2.5
100
60
Average
40
0
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
d. Year
30
Chapter 3: Air quality w.r.t. SO2 – 2019
In this chapter, a detailed comparison of locations and cities with respect to SO2 levels in the country has
been depicted.
Table 3.1 shows the number of locations and cities exceeding the NAAQS with respect to SO 2 during
2019. During 2019 in residential / Industrial / Rural area no location exceeded NAAQS of 50 µg/m3 and 3
locations in ecologically sensitive area exceeded NAAQS of 20 µg/m3. Taking cities into consideration, no
city exceeded the NAAQS with respect to SO2 and 1 city in ecologically sensitive area exceeded NAAQS
of 20 µg/m3.
Table 3.1. Number of locations and cities exceeding the NAAQS with respect to SO 2
(Based on annual average data in µg/m3)
No. of locations Number of cities
Residential / Industrial / Ecologically Residential / Industrial / Ecologically
Rural area Sensitive area Rural area Sensitive area
NAAQS >50 NAAQS >20 NAAQS >50 NAAQS >20
Not exceeding NAAQS (NE) 717 14 309 4
Exceeding NAAQS (E) 0 3 0 1
Inadequate data (ID) 41 0 15 0
No data (ND) 29 0 15 0
Total monitoring stations /
787 17 339 5
cities (NE & E & ID & ND )
Locations:
No location exceeded NAAQS for SO2 in Residential / Industrial / Rural area. The location with highest
level of SO2 (annual average) during 2019 is Himalaya Drug Co. near ISBT, Dehradun, Uttarakhand with
26 µg/m3 in Ecologically Sensitive area.
31
Chapter 3: Air quality w.r.t. SO2 – 2019
City:
Ambient air quality data with respect to SO2 is given in Annexure 3. No city exceeded NAAQS for SO2
in Residential / Industrial / Rural area. One city, Dehradun, Uttarakhand exceeded NAAQS with respect
to SO2 in 2019 in Ecologically Sensitive area with 25 µg/m3.
In this section, an attempt has been made to analyze air quality with respect to different zones and geo-
climatic area of the country as given in the Table 3.2:
.
The Central Zone comprises of Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh. Being a plateau region, it is rich in
minerals and is also home to many famous wildlife sanctuaries, national parks and bio-reserve. This area
experience moderate temperatures during both summer and winter months. The monsoons fall between
July and September which brings heavy downpour.
The East Zone is comprised of states of Andaman and Nicobar Islands, Bihar, Jharkhand, Orissa,
and West Bengal. The bulk of the region lies on the east coast of India by the Bay of Bengal, and on
the Indo-Gangetic plain. Jharkhand, on the Chhota Nagpur plateau, is a hilly and a heavily forested state
rich in mineral wealth. Odisha is also a mineral rich state of India. The region lies in the humid-subtropical
zone, and experiences hot summers from March to June, the monsoon from July to October and mild
winters from November to February. The interior states have a drier climate and slightly more extreme
climate, especially during the winters and summers, but the whole region receives heavy, sustained
rainfall during the monsoon months. Snowfall occurs in the extreme northern regions of West Bengal.
North zone comprises of Chandigarh, Delhi, Haryana. Himachal Pradesh, Jammu and Kashmir, Ladakh,
Punjab, Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand. The predominant geographical features of North India are the
Indo-Gangetic plain, the Himalayas and the Thar Desert. North India lies mainly in the North Temperate
32
Chapter 3: Air quality w.r.t. SO2 – 2019
Zone with though cool or cold winters, hot summers and moderate monsoons. Heavy to moderate
snowfall occurs in Himachal Pradesh, J&K and Uttarakhand and much of North India is notorious for
heavy fog during winters. The region receives rain and snow precipitation through two primary weather
patterns, the Indian Monsoon and the Western Disturbances.
North East Zone houses the states of Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, Manipur, Meghalaya,
Mizoram, Nagaland, Sikkim and Tripura. The region shares more than 4,500 kilometres of international
border with Tibet in the north, Myanmar in the east, Bangladesh in the southwest and Bhutan to the
northwest. The Northeast region can be physiographically categorised into the Eastern Himalaya,
the Patkai and the Brahmaputra and the Barak valley plains. It has a predominantly humid sub-tropical
climate with hot, humid summers, severe monsoons, and mild winters. Along with the west coast of India,
this region has some of the Indian sub-continent's last remaining rain forests.
South Zone contains Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Kerala, Lakshwadeep, Puducherry, Tamilnadu and
Telangana occupy the South Zone on India. South India is a peninsula in the shape of an inverted
triangle bound by the Arabian Sea on the west, by the Bay of Bengal on the east
and Vindhya and Satpura ranges on the north. The Western Ghats run parallel along the western coast.
The region has a tropical climate and depends on monsoons for rainfall.
West Zone houses the states and UTs of Dadra & Nagar Haveli and Daman & Diu, Goa, Gujarat
Maharashtra and Rajasthan. Goa and many places in Maharashtra are located in the western coasts.
The region consists of the predominantly arid to semi-arid region of Saurashtra and Kutch in the North.
The climate varies between tropical wet, tropical wet and dry, and semi arid. The vegetation varies from
tropical rainforests along the Konkan coast to thorny bushes and shrubs in northern Gujarat. The rivers of
this region are Mahi, Narmada, Tapi, Godavari, Zuari, Mandovi, Krishna, Ghaggar, Chambal and many
other smaller tributaries of other rivers.
The graphs below compares the ambient air quality with respect to SO 2 in different zones of the county.
SO2 in all the cities of the zones are within the National Standard except for Dehradun. It can be seen
that the central, south and north-east zones have lower concentration compared to east, north and west
zones (Figure 3.1 to Figure 3.6).
33
concentration in µg/m3
10
20
30
40
50
0
Bongaig aon
Da ranga
Dibrugarh
Golaghat
Guwahati
Margherita
Naga on
Assam
City in ecological sensitive area
Nalbari
North Lakhimpur
Silchar
Sivasag ar
Tezpur
Tinsukia
Byrnihat
NAAQS of SO2(Annual,R/I/Ru/O)
Dawki
Khliehriat
Nongstoin
Meg halaya
Shillong
Tura
Umiam / Umsning
Aizawl
Champhai
Mizoram
Kolasib
Lunglei
Dimapur
Figure 3.4: Ambient Air Quality in Cities of the North-East Zone w.r.t SO2
Nagaland
Kohima
Chungthang
Ga ng tok
Mangan
Namchi
Sikkim
Pelling
Ravang la
Singtam
Aga rtala
Tripura
Chapter 3: Air quality w.r.t. SO2 – 2019
34
concentration in µg/m3 concentration in µg/m3
10
20
30
40
50
60
10
20
30
40
50
60
0
Baldevi (D adra & Nag ar Ha veli) Anantapur
Da ma n Chitoor
& Diu
Eluru
Patlara (Daman)
Guntur
Andhra Pradesh
Cuncolim Rajahmundr y/…
Honda Sr ika kula m
Kundaim Tirupat i
Vija ywada
Mapusa
Vishak ha pa tnam
Margao
Goa
Vizianag ara m
Mormug ao
NAAQS of SO2(Annual,R/i/Ru/O)
Tuem Devanag er e
Usg ao Gulbur ga
Ha ssa n
Vasco
Hubli-Dhar wad
Karnataka
Ahmeda bad
Kolar
Anklesvar
Mandya
Ja mnag ar
Manga lore
Rajkot Mysore
Gujarat
Sura t Raichur
Vadoda ra Shimag a
Vapi Timukur u
Akola Alappuzha
Kochi
Ambernat h
Kollam
Amrav ati
Kot tay am
Aura ng abad
Kozhik ode
Badla pur NAAQS of SO2(Annual,ESA) Malapuram
Kerala
Bhiwandi Palakka d
Figure 3.6: Ambient Air Quality in Cities of the West Zone w.r.t SO2
Ja lna Wa yanad
Kara ik al
Kolhapur
Puducherr y
Lat ur
Puducherry
Maharashtra
Chenna i
Figure 3.5: Ambient Air Quality in Cities of the South Zone w.r.t SO2
Mumbai
Coimba tore
Nagpur
Cuddalor e
Nashik Madurai
Navi Mumba i Met tur
Tamilnadu
Pimpri-Chinchwad Sa lem
Pune Tr ichy
Sa ng li Tuticorin
Adilabad
Solapur
Hy de raba d
Thane
Karimna gar
Ulhasnaga r
Kha mmam
Alwar
Kot hur
Bha ra tpur Nalg onda
Bhiwadi
Telangana
Nizamabad
Chitt orgarh Patencheru
Not Exceeding- 63 (100%)
Ja ipur Ramagunda m
Exceedance from Standard
Rajasthan
Wa ranga l
Kot a
Uda ipur
Chapter 3: Air quality w.r.t. SO2 – 2019
35
Chapter 3: Air quality w.r.t. SO2 – 2019
The definitions of ‘near-coastal zone’ is "contiguous area along the coast that is less than 10 meters
above sea level’ (McGranahan et. al. 2007) and ‘within 100 km of a shoreline and 100 m of sea level’
(Small & Nicholls, 2003).
The level of SO2 in the coastal cities is within NAAQS including the coastal cities with ports(Figure 3.7).
Figure 3.7: Ambient Air Quality in Coastal Cities w.r.t SO2
50
NAAQS of SO2(Annual,R/I/Ru/O)
Exceedance from Standard
40 Not Exceeding- 66 (100%)
concentration in µg/m3
30
20
10
0
Da ma n
Mormug ao
Usg ao
Vasco
Ambernat h
Tuticorin
Tirupat i
Codli
Panaji
Vapi
Kochi
Bhiwandi
Dombivali
Navi Mumba i
Puri
Kara ik al
Chenna i
Srika kulam
Vishak ha pa tnam
Vizianag ara m
Bicholim
Cuncolim
Kundaim
Sang uem
Tuem
Kollam
Kot tay am
Thiruvananthapuram
Ong ole
Kozhik ode
Thane
Cuddalore
Anklesvar
Ja mnag ar
Thissur
Badla pur
Ulhasnagar
Berha mpur
Amona
Assanora
Haldia
Rajkot
Surat
Pathanamthitta
Konark
Puducherry
Ta mluk
Baldevi (D adra & Nag ar Ha veli)
Patlara (Daman)
Margao
Wa yanad
Para deep
Malapuram
Mumbai
Rajahmundry/ Ra ja ma hendravaram
Nellore
Mangalore
Medinipur
Kakina da
Silv assa
Honda
Mapusa
Ponda
Alappuzha
Tilamol
Balasore
Andhra Pradesh
Dadra & Nagar Hav eli and Daman & Diu Goa Gujarat Karnataka Kerala Maharashtra Odisha PuducherryTamilnadu West Bengal
The industrial cities in this report have been selected on the basis of the 100 industrial areas or clusters
selected by CPCB & MoEF&CC for application of Comprehensive Environmental Pollution Index (CEPI)
in respect of Air Pollution.
The SO2 levels are within NAAQS in the industrial cities [cities identified by CPCB as industrial clusters
and comprehensive environmental pollution index (CEPI) calculated accordingly] were within NAAQS in
both for residential / industrial and other areas (Figure 3.8).
50
NAAQS of SO2(Annual,R/I/Ru/O) NAAQS of SO2(Annual,ESA)
Exceedance from Standard
40 Not Exceeding- 69 (100%)
concentration in µg/m3
30
20
10
0
Ja ipur
Ludhiana
Ga jraula
Ha ldia
Dewas
Ahmeda bad
Kala Amb
Parwa noo
Dhanbad
Aura ng abad
Gobindgar h
Tuticorin
Patenche ru
Firozabad
Ghaziabad
Morada ba d
Howra h
Delhi
Vapi
Baddi
Kochi
Singra uli
Dombivali
Navi Mumba i
Angul
Bhiwadi
Var anasi
Asansol
Vishak ha pa tnam
Durg -Bhilla inaga r
Raipur
Anklesvar
Ja mshedpur
Bangalore
Manga lore
Gwa lior
Indore
Prithampur
Cha ndrapur
Ta lcher
Ja la ndhar
Jodhpur
Coimba tore
Cuddalor e
Met tur
Kanpur
Ha ridwa r
Rudrapur
Durg apur
Rajkot
Sura t
Byrniha t
Mee rut
Vija ywada
Korba
Vadoda ra
Barajamda
Sa raikela
Nagda
Jharsuguda
Agr a
Khurja
Mat hura
Noida
Nashik
Pimpri-Chinchwad
Para deep
Bidar
Raichur
Andhra Pradesh
ChattisgarhDelhi Gujarat Himachal Pradesh Jharkhand Karnataka Kerala Madhya Pradesh Maharashtra Meghalaya Odisha Punjab Rajasthan TamilnaduTelangana Uttar Pradesh UttarakhandWest Bengal
36
Chapter 3: Air quality w.r.t. SO2 – 2019
3.5 SO2 in the million plus cities (population > 10 lakhs) of the country
According to Census of India 2011, 53 million plus cities (population ≥ 10 lakh or 1 million) have been
recorded.
The level of SO2 in the million plus cities is within NAAQS both for residential / industrial and other areas
and ecologically sensitive area (Figure 3.9).
Figure 3.9: Ambient Air Quality in Million Plus Cities w.r.t SO2
50
NAAQS of SO2(Annual,R/I/Ru/O) NAAQS of SO2(Annual,ESA) Exceedance from Standard
40 Not Exceeding- 50 (100%)
concentration in µg/m 3
30
20
10
0
Cha ndigar h
Ahmeda bad
Aura ng abad
Hy deraba d
Alla ha ba d
Vishak ha pa tnam
De lhi
Kochi
Kollam
Thiruvananthapura m
Che nna i
Var anasi
Kozhik ode
Pune
Thane
Coimba tore
Durg -Bhilla inaga r
Raipur
Ja mshedpur
Thissur
Gwa lior
Ja ba lpur
Nagpur
Amritsar
Ja ipur
Jodhpur
Kanpur
Vija ywada
Rajkot
Sura t
Vadoda ra
Ludhiana
Kot a
Agr a
Meerut
Kolkat a
N ashik
Tr ichy
Lucknow
Dhanbad
Ghaziabad
Ranchi
Bhopal
Mumbai
Madurai
Asansol
Malapuram
Bangalore
Indore
Andhra Pradesh
Chandigarh
Chattisgarh Delhi Gujarat Jharkhand Karnataka Kerala Madhya Pradesh Maharashtra Punjab Rajasthan Tamilnadu Telangana Uttar Pradesh West Bengal
On the basis of 2014 - 2018 ambient air quality data, 122 non- attainment cities (cities exceeding the
national standard for consecutive five years) have been identified. The level of SO2 in the non- attainment
cities is within NAAQS for residential / industrial and other areas except for one city in ecologically area
(Figure 3.10).
Figure 3.10: Ambient Air Quality in Non- Attainment Cities w.r.t SO2
50
20
10
0
Eluru
Nagaon
Parwan oo
Hubli- Dh arwad
Ujjain
Tuticorin
Firo zabad
Moradabad
Howrah
Nellore
Bangalore
Devan agere
Pun e
Barrackpore
Raniganj
Kurno ol
Guwahati
Nalbari
Delhi
Badd i
Damtal
Bh opal
Amravati
Angul
Dera B assi
Naya Nangal
Jhansi
Raebareli
V aranasi
Asansol
Anantap ur
Kadapa
Silc har
Sivasagar
Muzaff arpur
Patna
V ad odara
Gulburga
Sagar
Chan drap ur
Kolhapu r
Latur
Nagpur
Solapur
Ulhasnagar
Koh im a
Bh ubneshwar
Kalinga Nagar
Ro urkela
Talcher
Khann a
Lu dhiana
Patiala
Alwar
Jaipu r
Jodhpu r
Kota
Nalgonda
Agra
Anpara
Kanpu r
Kashipu r
Durgapur
Haldia
Lu cknow
Surat
Byrnihat
Nashik
Cuttack
Dera B aba N an ak
Trichy
Bareily
Rajahm undry/ R ajam ahendravaram
Srikaku lam
V is hakhapatnam
V iz ianagaram
Chan digarh
Ahmedabad
Kala Amb
Nalagarh
Paonta Sahib
Jam mu
Dhanbad
Auran gabad
Jalgaon
Gobin dgarh
Hyderab ad
Patencheru
Allahabad
Ghaziabad
Dehradun
Rish ikesh
Dewas
On gole
Indo re
Thane
Mumb ai
Sangli
V ijaywada
Gaya
Korba
Akola
Jalna
Gajrau la
Khu rja
Noida
Kolkata
Chitoor
Guntur
Durg-Bh illainagar
Raipur
Sunder Nagar
Gwalior
Badlapur
Dimapur
Amritsar
Jalandh ar
Udaipur
Sangareddy
Balasore
37
Chapter 4: Air quality wrt. NO2 - 2019
Oxides of nitrogen are a generic term for a group of Status of NO2 in 2019
highly reactive gases that contain nitrogen and oxygen
in varying amounts. Oxides of nitrogen are formed Nitrogen dioxide (NO2) is a
during combustion processes at high temperatures reddish-brown toxic gas and is a
from the oxidation of nitrogen in air. NOx are emitted prominent air pollutant. NO2 irritates the
as nitrogen oxide (NO) which is rapidly oxidized to nose and throat increase susceptibility to
nitrogen dioxide (NO2). Nitrogen dioxide (NO2) is a respiratory infections. It is a potent and
reddish-brown toxic gas with a characteristic sharp, selective vasodilator in pulmonary
biting odor and is a prominent air pollutant. Sources of arterial hypertension.
nitrogen oxides includes lightning, forest fires,
Air quality of different zones
bacterial activity of soil as natural source and vehicles,
reveals that the north-east is within the
industrial processes that burn, high temperature
combustion (internal combustion engines, fossil fuel- NAAQS. Both central and north-east
fired power stations, industrial, burning of bio-mass zones and have lower concentration
and fossil fuels are anthropogenic sources. NO2 than south, east, north and west zones.
irritates the nose and throat increase susceptibility to The coastal cities are almost
respiratory infections. In addition, NOx is a potent and within NAAQS except for 6 of the cities of
selective vasodilator in pulmonary arterial Maharashtra. Among the 69 industrial
hypertension. Oxides of nitrogen react with Volatile cities under NAMP, 13 cities exceed the
Organic Compounds (VOCs) to form ground level NAAQS. 8 cities among the million plus
ozone. They also react to form nitrates, acid aerosols. cities exceed the national standard and
Almost all NOx is emitted as NO, which is rapidly among the 122 non- attainment cities, 15
oxidized to non toxic NO2. cities exceed the standard.
In this chapter, a detailed comparison of locations and cities with respect to NO2 levels in the country has
been depicted.
Table 4.1 shows the number of locations and cities exceeding the NAAQS with respect to NO2 during
2019. During 2019 in residential / Industrial / Rural area 91 locations exceed NAAQS of 40 µg/m3 and 5
locations exceed NAAQS of 30 µg/m3. Taking cities into consideration, in residential / Industrial / Rural
area 28 cities exceed NAAQS of 40 µg/m3 and 2 cities exceeded the NAAQS of 30 µg/m3 in Ecologically
Sensitive area.
Table 4.1. Number of locations and cities exceeding the NAAQS with respect to NO2
(Based on annual average data in µg/m3)
No. of locations Number of cities
Residential / Industrial / Ecologically Residential / Industrial / Ecologically
Rural area Sensitive area Rural area Sensitive area
NAAQS >40 NAAQS >30 NAAQS >40 NAAQS >30
Not exceeding NAAQS (NE) 627 12 282 3
Exceeding NAAQS (E) 91 5 28 2
Inadequate data (ID) 32 0 14 0
No data (ND) 37 0 15 0
Total monitoring stations /
787 17 339 5
cities (NE & E & ID & ND )
Locations:
The location with highest level of NO2 (annual average) during 2019 is Town Hall, Ayurvedic Dispensary,
Chandni Chowk, Delhi with 117 µg/m3 in Residential / Industrial / Rural area and Gaurav Solvex Ltd. MIA,
Alwar, Rajasthan with 37 µg/m3 in Ecologically Sensitive area
38
Chapter 4: Air quality wrt. NO2 - 2019
City:
Ambient air quality data with respect to NO2 is given in Annexure 4. The city (Residential / Industrial /
Rural area) with highest level of NO2 (annual average) during 2019 is Pune, Maharashtra with 87 µg/m3
and Alwar, Rajasthan (Ecologically Sensitive area) with 34 µg/m3.
The graphs below compare the ambient air quality with respect to NO2 in different zones of the county. It
can be seen that the north-east is within the NAAQS. Both central and north-east zones and have lower
concentration than south, east, north and west zones (Figure 4.1 to Figure 4.6).
Figure 4.1: Ambient Air Quality in Cities of Central Zone w.r.t NO2
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Durg-Bhillainagar
Gwalior
Jabalpur
Sagar
Amlai
Bhopal
Singrauli
Indore
Dewas
Korba
Nagda
Satna
Bilaspur
Raipur
Prithampur
Ujjain
Katni
Chhindwara
Figure 4.2: Ambient Air Quality in Cities of the East Zone w.r.t NO2
80
Exceedance from Standard
70 NAAQS of NO2 (Annual, R/I/Ru/O)
Not Exceeding- 63 (89%)
Exceeding- 8 (11%)
60
concentration in µg/m3
50
40
30
20
10
0
Rampur ha t
Chinsur a
Ha ldia
Malda
Pur ulia
Da rjee ling
Konar k
Ta mluk
Ranig anj
Dhanbad
Bona iga rh
Bar dhaman
Howra h
Beg usar ai
Sindr i
Angul
Pur i
Asansol
Da nk uni
Ghat al
Ja lpaiguri
Kalyani
Sa nkr ail
Tr ibe ni
Jhar gra m
Madhyamgr am
Ja mshedpur
Rajgir
Ber ha mpur
Bhubneshwa r
Kalinga Naga r
Rajgangpur
Sa mbalpur
Ta lcher
Alipurdua r
Bahar ampur
Bolpur
Coochbe har
Durg apur
Krishnanaga r
Medinipur
Da rbha ng a
Ga ya
Patna
Bar ajamda
Jhar ia
Sa raike la
Jhar suguda
Raya gada
Rour kela
Amtala
Bankura
Kolkat a
Rishra
Ulube ria
Balur ghat
Bar asat
Kalimpong
Cut tack
Para de ep
Raigunj
Sa sa ram
Ranchi
Siliguri
Ranagha t
Suri
Bar uipur
Balasore
39
concentration in µg/m3 concentration in µg/m3 concentration in µg/m3
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
0
10
20
30
40
50
Anantapur
Cha ndigarh
Chitoor
Bongaigaon Delhi
Chandigarh
Delhi
Eluru
Baddi
Guntur Daranga Damt al
Kadapa Dharamshala
Kakinada Dibrugarh Kala Amb
Kurnool Manali
Nellore Golaghat Nalagarh
Ongole Paont a Sahib
Himachal Pradesh
Guwahati Parwa noo
Rajahmundry/…
Andhra Pradesh
Srikakulam Shimla
Margherita
Sunder Na gar
Tirupati
Nagaon Ja mmu
Vijaywada
Alig arh (Jag raon)
Assam
Vishakhapatnam
Tinsukia Gobindgarh
Hubli-Dharwad
Ja la ndhar
Karnataka
Kolar Imphal
Punjab
Kha nna
NAAQS of NO2(Annual,R/I/Ru/O)
Mandya Kha raori (Sirhind)
Manipur
Mangalore Byrnihat
Kot ladoom (Ajnala )
Mysore Ludhiana
Raichur
Dawki
Mukandpur (Nawashahar)
Shimaga Khliehriat Mureedke (Bat ala)
Timukuru Naudhra ni (Malerkot la )
Alappuzha Nongstoin Naya Nangal
Kochi Patiala
Qila Bha rian (S angrur)
Meghalaya
Kollam Shillong
Rakhra ( Patiala )
Kottayam
Tura Rohila (S amrala)
Kozhikode
Tirathpur (Amritsar I)
Malapuram Umiam / Umsning Agra
Kerala
NAAQS of NO2 (Annual, ESA)
Palakkad Alla ha ba d
Pathanamthitta Aizawl Anpa ra
Thiruvananthapuram Baghpat
Thissur Champhai Bareily
Wayanad Firozabad
Kolasib
Mizoram
Karaikal Ga jraula
Ghaziabad
Figure 4.5: Ambient Air Quality in Cities of the South Zone w.r.t NO2
Puducherry
Figure 4.3: Ambient Air Quality in Cities of the North Zone w.r.t NO2
Lunglei
Gorakpur
Puducherry
Chennai
Dimapur Grea ter Noida
Coimbatore
Hapur
Exceeding- 5 (8%)
Cuddalore
Kohima Jhansi
Madurai
Mettur
Uttar Pradesh
Chungthang Khurja
Tamilnadu
Salem Lucknow
Trichy Gangtok Mat hura
Tuticorin Meerut
Adilabad Mangan Moradaba d
Hyderabad Muzaffarnagar
Karimnagar
Namchi Noida
Khammam Raeba reli
Sikkim
Pelling Saha ranpur
Kothur
Unnao
Nalgonda Rangpo Varanasi
Not Exceeding- 36 (100%)
Nizamabad
Telangana
Exceedance from Standard
Dehradun
Patencheru Ravangla
Ha ldwani
Ramagundam Ha ridwar
Singtam
Exceeding- 6 (9%)
Sangareddy Kashipur
Uttarak hand
Not Exceeding- 63 (91%)
Rudrapur
Tripura
Chapter 4: Air quality wrt. NO2 - 2019
40
concentration in µg/m3 concentration in µg/m3
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Baldevi
Kakinada Daman
& Diu
Nellore Patlara (Daman)
Dadra &
and Daman
Ongole Silvassa
Nagar Haveli
Rajahm undry/ Rajamahendravaram Amona
Srikakulam
Assanora
Andhra Dadra
Tir upati
Pradesh
Vishakhapatnam
Bicholim
Vizianagaram Codli
Baldev i(Dadra & Nagar Haveli) Cuncolim
Silvassa Honda
Daman Kundaim
Patlara (Dam an)
Mapusa
Amona
Margao
Goa
Assanora
Bicholim Mormugao
Cuncolim Ponda
NAAQS of NO2(Annual,R/I/Ru/O)
Not Exceeding- 48 (83%)
Honda
Exceedance from Standard
Sanguem
Kundaim Tilamol
NAAQS of NO2(Annual,R/i/Ru/O)
Mapusa
Tuem
Margao
Goa
Mor mugao Usgao
Panaji Vasco
Ponda Ahmedabad
Sanguem Anklesvar
Vasco Surat
Anklesvar Vadodara
Gujarat Karnataka
Kochi Badlapur
Koll am Bhiwandi
Exceeding- 6 (9%)
Kottayam Chandrapur
NAAQS of NO2(Annual,ESA)
Kozhikode
Kerala
Jalgaon
Pathanamthitta
Figure 4.6: Ambient Air Quality in Cities of the West Zone w.r.t NO2
Badlapur Nagpur
Bhiwandi
Nashik
Dombivali
Mum bai
Navi Mumbai
Pimpri-Chinchwad
Maharashtra
Navi Mumbai
Thane Pune
Ulhasnag ar Sangli
Balasore Solapur
Ber hampur Thane
Konar k
Ulhasnagar
Paradeep
Pur i Alwar
Karai kal Bharatpur
Puducherry Bhiwadi
Odisha Puducherry
Chennai Chittorgarh
Cuddalore Jaipur
Tuticorin
Rajasthan
Tamilnadu
Jodhpur
Haldia
Medinipur Kota
Tamluk Udaipur
West Bengal
The level of NO2 in the coastal cities are almost within NAAQS including the coastal cities with ports
Chapter 4: Air quality wrt. NO2 - 2019
41
Chapter 4: Air quality wrt. NO2 - 2019
Among the 69 industrial cities under NAMP, 12 cities exceed the NAAQS of 40 µg/m3 in the industrial /
residential and other area and 1 city exceed the NAAQS of 30 µg/m3 in the ecologically sensitive area.
Figure 4.8).
60
concentration in µg/m3
50
40
30
20
10
0
Baddi
Navi Mumbai
Gwa lior
Jaipur
Jodhpur
Jharsuguda
Ludhiana
Agra
Gajraula
Haldia
Rajkot
Surat
Byrnihat
Nashik
Dewas
Ahmedabad
Kala Amb
Parwanoo
Dhanbad
Aura ng abad
Pimpri-Chinchwad
Paradeep
Gobindgarh
Tuticorin
Patencheru
Firozabad
Ghaziabad
Moradabad
Howrah
Delhi
Vapi
Kochi
Singrauli
Dombivali
Angul
Bhiwadi
Varanasi
Asansol
Vishak hapa tnam
Durg -Bhilla inaga r
Raipur
Anklesvar
Jamshedpur
Bangalore
Mangalore
Indore
Prithampur
Chandrapur
Talcher
Jalandhar
Coimba tore
Cuddalore
Met tur
Kanpur
Haridwa r
Rudrapur
Durg apur
Meerut
Vijaywada
Korba
Vadoda ra
Barajamda
Saraikela
Nagda
Khurja
Mat hura
Noida
Raichur
Bidar
Andhra Pradesh
ChattisgarhDelhi Gujarat Himachal Pradesh Jharkhand Karnataka Kerala Madhya Pradesh Maharashtra Meghalaya Odisha Punjab Rajasthan TamilnaduTelangana Uttar Pradesh Uttarak handWest Bengal
4.5 NO2 in the million plus cities (population >10 lakhs) of the country
Among the 53 million plus cities, 8 cities exceed the NAAQS of 40 µg/m3 in the residential / industrial and
other areas. (Figure 4.9).
Figure 4.9: Ambient Air Quality in Million Plus Cities w.r.t NO2
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Cha ndigarh
Ahmedabad
Aura ng abad
Hy deraba d
Alla haba d
Vishak ha patnam
Delhi
Kochi
Kollam
Thiruvananthapuram
Chenna i
Varanasi
Kozhik ode
Pune
Thane
Coimbatore
Durg -Bhilla inagar
Raipur
Ja mshedpur
Thissur
Gwa lior
Ja balpur
Nagpur
Amritsar
Jaipur
Jodhpur
Kanpur
Vija ywada
Patna
Vadodara
Ludhiana
Kot a
Agra
Kolkat a
Rajkot
Surat
Meerut
Nashik
Trichy
Lucknow
Dhanbad
Ghaziabad
Ranchi
Malapuram
Bhopal
Mumbai
Madurai
Asansol
Bangalore
Indore
Andhra Pradesh
Bihar
Chandigarh
ChattisgarhDelhi Gujarat Jharkhand Karnataka Kerala Madhya Pradesh Maharashtra Punjab Rajasthan Tamilnadu Telangana Uttar Pradesh West Bengal
42
concentration in µg/m3
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
0
Anantapur
4.10).
Chitoor
Eluru
Guntur
Kadapa
Kur nool
N ellore
Ong ole
Andhra Pradesh
Rajahmundr y/ Ra ja ma he ndra var am
Sr ika kula m
Vija ywada
Vishak ha pa tnam
Vizianag ara m
Guwahat i
N aga on
N alba ri
Assam
Silchar
Sivasag ar
Ga ya
Muza ffar pur
Patna
Cha ndigar h
Durg -Bhilla inaga r
BiharChandigarh
Kor ba
Raipur
De lhi
Ahme da bad
Sura t
ChattisgarhDelhi Gujarat
Vadoda ra
Baddi
Himachal PradeshJammu
Kashmir
Dhanbad
Bangalore
Jharkhand
De vanag er e
Gulbur ga
Hubli-Dhar wad
Bhopal
De was
Gwa lior
Indore
Sa gar
Amrav ati
Aura ng abad
Badla pur
Cha ndr apur
Ja lga on
Ja lna
Kolhapur
Lat ur
Mumbai
Maharashtra
N agpur
4.5 NO2 in the Non- attainment cities of the country
N ashik
N avi Mumba i
Pune
Sa ng li
Solapur
Thane
Ulhasnaga r
Byrniha t
Dimapur
MeghalNagal
Kohima
a ya and
Angul
Balasore
Bhubneshwa r
Cut tack
Odisha
Kalinga N aga r
Rour kela
Ta lcher
Figure 4.10: Ambient Air Quality in Non- Attainment Cities w.r.t NO2
Amritsar
De ra Baba Na nak
De ra Bassi
Gobindgar h
Ja la ndhar
Punjab
Kha nna
NAAQS of NO2 (Annual, ESA)
Ludhiana
Naya N angal
Patiala
Alwar
Ja ipur
Jodhpur
Kot a
Uda ipur
Tr ichy
Tuticorin
Hy de raba d
N alg onda
Pate nche ru
Rajasthan TamilnaduTelangana
Sa ng are ddy
Agr a
Alla ha ba d
Anpa ra
Bar eily
Firozabad
Ga jr aula
Ghaziabad
Exceeding- 15 (12%)
Jhansi
Not Exceeding- 106 (88%)
Kanpur
Exceedance from Standard
Uttar Pradesh
Khurja
Lucknow
Morada ba d
N oida
Rae ba re li
Var anasi
De hr adun
Kashipur
Rishik esh
Uttarakhand
Asansol
Bar rack pore
Durg apur
Ha ldia
Among the 122 non- attainment cities, 14 cities exceed the NAAQS of 40 µg/m3 in the residential /
industrial and other areas and 1 cities exceed the NAAQS of 30 µg/m3 in the ecologically area (Figure
Chapter 4: Air quality wrt. NO2 - 2019
43
Howra h
West Bengal
Kolkat a
Ranig anj
Chapter 5: Air quality wrt. PM10 - 2019
44
Chapter 5: Air quality wrt. PM10 - 2019
Respirable Suspended Particulate Matter or PM10 are the particles with upper size limited by a 50% cut
at 10 m aerodynamic diameter (USEPA, 1996). They consist of particles with a diameter up to 10 µm.
The major constituents of PM10 are organic and elemental carbon, metals/elements like silicon,
magnesium, iron, ions like sulphates, nitrates, ammonium etc. PM10 can be formed by physical
processes of crushing, grinding and abrasion of surfaces. Mining and agricultural activities are some of
the sources of large size particles. The anthropogenic source are mechanical break-up of larger solid
particles, wind blown dust such as road dust, fly ash, soot, agricultural processes, physical processes of
crushing, grinding and abrasion of surfaces, photo chemically produced particles, such as those found in
urban haze, pollen grains, mould spores, and plant and insect parts, combustion of fossil fuel (coal,
heavy fuel oil in thermal power plants, office, factories), paper Industry, extraction & distribution of fossil
fuels, smelting of metals (sulfide ores to produce copper, lead and zinc), petroleum refining, combustion
process in diesel, petrol, natural gas driven vehicles. PM10 can settle in the bronchi and lungs and cause
health problems like respiratory illness, visibility impairment, aggravate existing heart and lung diseases.
It also causes visibility reduction. A compilation of sources and effects of PM10 are given in Annexure 1.
In this chapter, a detailed comparison of locations and cities with respect to PM10 levels in the country
has been.
Table 5.2 shows the number of locations and cities exceeding the NAAQS with respect to PM10 during
2019. During 2019 in residential / Industrial / Rural area 577 location exceed NAAQS of 60 µg/m3 and in
ecologically Sensitive area 17 locations exceed NAAQS of 60 µg/m3. Taking cities into consideration, in
45
Chapter 5: Air quality wrt. PM10 - 2019
residential / Industrial / Rural area 246 cities exceed NAAQS of 60 µg/m3 and in ecologically Sensitive
area 5 cities exceed NAAQS of 60 µg/m3.
Table 5.2. Number of locations and cities exceeding the NAAQS with respect to PM10
(Based on annual average data in µg/m3)
No. of locations Number of cities
Residential / Industrial / Ecologically Residential / Industrial / Ecologically
Rural area Sensitive area Rural area Sensitive area
NAAQS >60 NAAQS >60 NAAQS >60 NAAQS >60
Not exceeding NAAQS (NE) 154 0 70 0
Exceeding NAAQS (E) 577 17 246 5
Inadequate data (ID) 27 0 11 0
No data (ND) 29 0 12 0
Total monitoring stations /
cities (NE & E & ID & ND) 787 17 339 5
Locations:
The location with highest level of PM10 (annual average) during 2019 is India Glycol Ltd. Gida,
Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh with 351 µg/m3 in Residential / Industrial / Rural area and Nunhai, Agra, Uttar
Pradesh with 228 µg/m3 in Ecologically Sensitive area.
City:
Ambient air quality data with respect to PM10 is given in Annexure 5. The city (Residential / Industrial /
Rural area) with highest level of PM10 (annual average) during 2019 is Jharia, Jharkhand with 302 µg/m3
and Firozabad, Uttar Pradesh (Ecologically Sensitive area) with 214 µg/m3.
The graphs below compares the ambient air quality with respect to PM10 in different zones of the county.
It can be seen that the central, north-east and south zones have comparatively lower level of PM10 than
east, north and west zones (Fugure 5.2 to 5.7).
200
150
100
50
0
Prithampur
Raigarh
Dewas
Indore
Korba
Nagda
Satna
Bilaspur
Durg-Bhillainagar
Raipur
Gwali or
Jabalpur
Sagar
Amlai
Bhopal
Katni
Singrauli
Ujjain
Chhindwara
46
concentration in µg/m3 concentration in µg/m 3
concentration in µg/m3
100
150
200
250
300
50
100
150
200
250
300
50
0
Beg usar ai
100
150
200
250
0
50
Cha ndigarh Da rbha ng a
Chandigarh
Delhi
Delhi
Ga ya
Bongaigaon Baddi Muza ffar pur
Bihar
Da mt al
Patna
Daranga Dharamsha la
Rajgir
Kala Amb
Sa sa ram
Dibrugarh Manali
Barajamda
Nala garh
Dhanbad
Golaghat Paont a Sahib
Ja mshedpur
Himachal Pradesh
Parwa noo
Guwahati Jhar ia
Shimla
Jharkhand
Sunder Na gar Ranchi
Margherita Una Sa raike la
Ja mmu Sindri
Nagaon Pulwama Angul
Assam
Srinag ar Balasore
Manipur
Kha nna
Ta lcher
Punjab
Byrnihat Kha raori (Sirhind)
Kot la doom (Ajna la ) Alipurdua r
Dawki Ludhiana Amtala
Mra r Ka la n (Muktsar) Asansol
Khliehriat Mukandpur (Nawashahar) Bahar ampur
Mureedke (Bat ala) Balurghat
Nongstoin Naudhra ni (Malerkot la ) Bankura
NAAQS of PM10(Annual,R/I/Ru/O)
Naya Nangal Barasat
Meg ha laya
Shillong Patiala Bardhaman
Poohli ( Bhat inda) Barrack pore
Tura Qila Bha rian (S angrur) Baruipur
Rakhra ( Pat ia la )
Figure 5.5 : Ambient Air Quality in Cities of the North-East Zone w.r.t PM10
Bolpur
Umiam / Umsning Rohila (S amrala)
Chinsura
Tira thpur (Amritsar I)
Coochbehar
Aizawl Agra
Da nk uni
Alla ha ba d
Da rjeeling
Champhai Anpa ra
Durg apur
NAAQS of PM10 (Annual, R/I/Ru/O)
Baghpat
Ghat al
Mizoram
Kolasib Bareily
Figure 5.3 : Ambient Air Quality in Cities of the East Zone w.r.t PM10
Ha ldia
Firozabad
Figure 5.4 : Ambient Air Quality in Cities of the North Zone w.r.t PM10
Ghaziabad Ja lpaiguri
Naga land
Kohima
Jhansi Kha rag pur
Chungthang Kanpur Kolkat a
Uttar Pradesh
Khurja Krishnanaga r
Gangtok Lucknow Madhyamgram
Mat hura Malda
Mangan Meerut Medinipur
Morada ba d
Pur ulia
Namchi Muza ffarnaga r
Raigunj
Noida
Rampurha t
Exceeding- 11 (31%)
Sikkim
Pelling Raeba reli
Ranagha t
Rangpo Unnao
Rishra
Exceedance from Standard
Varanasi
Sa nkrail
Ravangla Dehradun
Ha ldwani
Siliguri
Chapter 5: Air quality wrt. PM10 - 2019
47
Singtam Ha ridwa r Suri
Kashipur Ta mluk
Exceeding- 71 (96%)
Uttarakhand
Not Exceeding- 3 (4%)
Tripura
Exceedance from Standard
Rudrapur Uluberia
concentration in µg/m3
100
150
50
0
Anantapur
Chitoor
Eluru
Guntur
Kadapa
Kakina da
Kur nool
Nellore
Ong ole
Andhra Pradesh
Rajahmundr y/…
Sr ika kula m
Tirupat i
Vija ywada
Vishak ha pa tnam
Belga um
Bidar
Chitr adurga
Devanag er e
Gulbur ga
Ha ssa n
Hubli-Dhar wad
Karnataka
Palakka d
Pathanamthitta
Thiruvananthapura m
Thissur
Wa yanad
Kara ik al
Puducherr y
Puducherry
Chenna i
Figure 5.6 : Ambient Air Quality in Cities of the South Zone w.r.t PM10
Coimba tore
Cuddalor e
Madurai
Met tur
Tamilnadu
Sa le m
Tr ichy
Tuticorin
Adilabad
Hy deraba d
Karimna gar
Kha mmam
Kot hur
Nalg onda
Telangana
Nizamabad
Exceeding- 33 (52%)
Patenche ru
Not Exceeding- 30 (48%)
Exceedance from Standard
Ramagunda m
Among the 73 coastal cities under NAMP, 44 cities exceed the NAAQS of 60 µg/m3 in the industrial /
Chapter 5: Air quality wrt. PM10 - 2019
48
Sa ng areddy
Wa ranga l
concentration in µg/m3
concentration in µg/m3
100
150
200
250
300
50
100
150
200
250
300
50
0
Kakinada
Vija ywada
Nellore
Vishak ha pa tnam
Ong ole
Andhra Pradesh
Durg -Bhilla inaga r
Rajahmundry/ Ra jamahendravaram
Korba
Raipur
Srikakulam
Tirupat i
Andhra Pradesh
Delhi
Chattisgarh Delhi
Ahmeda bad Vishak hapatnam
Anklesvar Vizianag aram
Rajkot Baldevi(Dadra & Na gar H aveli)
Gujarat
Sura t Silv assa
Vadoda ra Daman
Vapi Patlara (Daman)
Baddi Amona
Kala Amb Assanora
Margao
Goa
Manga lore
Karnataka
Mormug ao
Raichur
Panaji
Kochi
Kerala
Ponda
Dewas
Sa ng uem
Gwa lior
Tilamol
Indore
Madhya Pradesh
Prithampur
Singra uli Vasco
Aura ng abad Anklesvar
Cha ndrapur Jamnag ar
Dombivali Rajkot
Gujarat
Nashik Sura t
Maharashtra
Navi Mumba i Vapi
Pimpri-Chinchwad Manga lore
Karnataka
Byrniha t Alappuzha
Angul Kochi
Exceeding- 58 (84%)
Not Exceeding- 11 (16%)
Jharsuguda Kollam
Meghalaya Odisha
Para deep
Kot tay am
Ta lcher
Kozhik ode
Gobindgarh
Kerala
Malapuram
Ja la ndhar
Punjab
Pathanamthitta
ecologically sensitive area exceed the NAAQS of 60 µg/m3 (Figure 5.9).
Ludhiana
Figure 5.8: Ambient Air Quality in Coastal Cities w.r.t PM10
Thiruvananthapuram
Bhiwadi
Thissur
Ja ipur
Wa yanad
Rajasthan
Jodhpur
Ambernat h
Coimba tore
Badlapur
Cuddalore
Met tur
Bhiwandi
Tuticorin Dombivali/Ambernath
Patencheru Mumbai
Maharashtra
Tamilnadu Telangana
Agra Navi Mumba i
Firozabad Thane
Ga jraula Ulhasnaga r
Ghaziabad Balasore
Kanpur Berhampur
Khurja Konark
Odisha
Exceeding- 44 (67%)
Mat hura
Uttar Pradesh
Paradeep
Not Exceeding- 22 (33%)
Meerut
Exceedance from Standard
Puri
Morada ba d Karaik al
Noida
Puducherry
Varanasi
Chenna i
Ha ridwa r
Cuddalore
Rudrapur
Tuticorin
Asansol
Haldia
Durg apur
Chapter 5: Air quality wrt. PM10 - 2019
49
Among the 69 industrial cities under NAMP, 62 cities in the industrial / residential exceed and
Medinipur
Ha ldia
Howra h
Chapter 5: Air quality wrt. PM10 - 2019
Among the 53 million plus cities, 43 cities in the industrial / residential and 1 citiy in the ecologically
sensitive area exceed the NAAQS of 60 µg/m3 (Figure 5.10). Out of the million plus cities 23 cities are
industrial cities.
Figure 5.10: Ambient Air Quality in Million Plus Cities w.r.t PM10
300
Exceedance from Standard
NAAQS of PM10(Annual,R/I/Ru/O& ESA)
Not Exceeding- 7 (14%)
Exceeding- 44 (86%)
250
200
concentration in µg/m3
150
100
50
Ja ba lpur
Nagpur
Ja ipur
Ludhiana
Kot a
Sura t
Cha ndigarh
Ahmeda bad
Dhanbad
Aura ng abad
Hy deraba d
Alla ha ba d
Ghaziabad
Vishak ha pa tnam
De lhi
Kochi
Kollam
Thiruvananthapura m
Bhopal
Mumbai
Chenna i
Varanasi
Asansol
Bangalore
Kozhik ode
Indore
Pune
Thane
Coimba tore
Durg -Bhilla inaga r
Raipur
Srinag ar
Ja mshedpur
Thissur
Gwa lior
Amritsar
Jodhpur
Kanpur
Vija ywada
Patna
Vadoda ra
Agra
Kolkat a
Rajkot
Meerut
Nashik
Trichy
Lucknow
Ranchi
Malapuram
Madurai
Andhra PradeshBihar
Chandigarh
Chattisgarh Delhi Gujarat Jammu & KashmirJharkhand Karnataka Kerala Madhya Pradesh Maharashtra Punjab Rajasthan Tamilnadu Telangana Uttar Pradesh West Bengal
Among the 122 non - attainment cities, 107 cities in the industrial / residential and 4 cities in the
ecologically sensitive area exceed the NAAQS of 60 µg/m3 (Figure 5.11).
50
Chapter 6: Air quality wrt. PM2.5 - 2019
In this chapter a detailed comparison of locations and cities with respect to PM2.5 levels in the country
has been.
Table 6.1 shows the number of locations and cities exceeding the NAAQS with respect to PM2.5 during
2019. During 2019 in residential / Industrial / Rural area 72 locations exceed NAAQS of 40 µg/m3 and 4
locations exceed the NAAQS of 40 µg/m3 in Ecologically sensitive area. Taking cities into consideration,
in residential / Industrial / Rural area 39 cities exceed NAAQS of 40 µg/m3 and 1 city exceed the NAAQS
of 40 µg/m3 in Ecologically sensitive area.
51
Chapter 6: Air quality wrt. PM2.5 - 2019
Table 6.1. Number of locations and cities exceeding the NAAQS with respect to PM2.5
(Based on annual average data in µg/m3)
No. of locations Number of cities
Residential / Industrial / Ecologically Residential / Industrial / Ecologically
Rural area Sensitive area Rural area Sensitive area
NAAQS >40 NAAQS >40 NAAQS >40 NAAQS >40
Not exceeding NAAQS (NE) 125 0 77 0
Exceeding NAAQS (E) 72 4 39 1
Inadequate data (ID) 114 2 30 0
No data (ND) 0 0 0 0
Total monitoring stations /
cities (NE & E & ID & ND) 311 6 146 1
Locations:
The location (Residential / Industrial / Rural area) with highest level of PM2.5 (annual average) during
2019 is Pritampura, Delhi with 128 µg/m3 and Etmad-uddaulah, Agra, Uttar Pradesh (Ecologically
sensitive area) with 135 µg/m3.
City:
Ambient air quality data with respect to PM2.5 is given in Annexure 6. The city (Residential / Industrial /
Rural area) with highest level of PM2.5 (annual average) during 2019 is Delhi with 141 µg/m3 and Agra,
Uttar Pradesh (Ecologically sensitive area) with 110 µg/m3.
The graphs below compares the ambient air quality with respect to PM2.5 in different zones of the county.
It can be seen that the central, south and north-east zones have lower concentration compared to east,
north and west zones (Figure 6.2 to 6.5).
Figure 6.2: Ambient Air Quality in Cities of Central Zone & North Zone w.r.t PM2.5
150
CENTRAL ZONE NAAQS of PM2.5 (Annual, R/I/Ru/O & ESA)
NORTH ZONE
Exceedance from Standard
Exceedance from Standard
concentration in µg/m3
50
0
Dharamshala
Durg-Bhillain agar
Prithampur
Sagar
Sunder Nagar
Hapur
Kanpur
Bh opal
Singrauli
Delh i
Damtal
Manali
Parw anoo
Chan digarh
Jammu
Indore
Dewas
Korba
Shimla
Agra
Greater Noida
Noida
Bilaspur
Gwalior
Muzaffarnagar
Baghpat
Raigarh
Ghaziabad
Chhindwara
52
Chapter 6: Air quality wrt. PM2.5 - 2019
Figure 6.3: Ambient Air Quality in Cities of the East & Northeast Zone w.r.t PM2.5
100
EAST ZONE NORTH-EAST ZONE
NAAQS of PM2.5 (Annual, R/I/Ru/O) Exceedance from Standard
Exceedance from Standard
Not Exceeding- 6 (25%) Not Exceeding- 2 (67%)
Exceeding- 18 (75%) Exceeding- 1(33%)
concentration in µg/m3
50
0 Bhubneshwar
Rajgangpur
Barrackpore
Jharsuguda
Rayagada
Rourkela
Haldia
Agartala
Darjeeling
Shillong
Cuttack
Muzaffarpur
Berhampur
Sambalpur
Talcher
Durgapur
Begusarai
Angul
Asansol
Kalyani
Siliguri
Guwahati
Bonaigarh
Paradeep
Howrah
Kolkata
Balasore
60 Figure 6.4: Ambient Air Quality in Cities of the South Zone w.r.t PM2.5
Exceedance from Standard
Not Exceeding- 29 (88%)
NAAQS of PM2.5 (Annual, R/I/Ru/O) Exceeding- 4 (12%)
concentration in µg/m 3
40
20
0
Rajahmundry/…
Anantapur
Chitoor
Kurnool
Chennai
Eluru
Hassan
Hubli-Dharwad
Tuticorin
Nellore
Ongole
Srikakulam
Vishakhapatnam
Vizianagaram
Bangalore
Belgaum
Devanagere
Mysore
Kozhikode
Coimbatore
Cuddalore
Kadapa
Kakinada
Vijaywada
Trichy
Sangareddy
Guntur
Tirupati
Adilabad
Hyderabad
Patencheru
Shimaga
Bidar
Figure 6.5: Ambient Air Quality in Cities of the West Zone w.r.t PM2.5
80
40
20
0
Sanguem
Honda
Vadodara
Anklesvar
Jamnagar
Rajkot
Surat
Codli
Panaji
Vapi
Mumbai
Margao
Usgao
Vasco
Daman
Ahmedabad
Patlara (Daman)
Bicholim
Cuncolim
Kundaim
Tuem
Silvassa
Amona
Assanora
Nagpur
Baldevi
Tilamol
Ponda
Dadra & Nagar Haveli and Daman & Diu Goa Gujarat Maharashtra
53
Chapter 6: Air quality wrt. PM2.5 - 2019
Among the 73 coastal cities under NAMP, PM2.5 is monitored at 44 cities and among these 5 cities
exceed the NAAQS of 40 µg/m3 in the industrial / residential and out of which 2 cities have a port (Figure
6.6).
40
20
0
Rajahmundry/…
Jamnagar
Vapi
Mumbai
Chennai
Usgao
Vasco
Daman
Patlara (Daman)
Nellore
Ongole
Srikakulam
Vishakhapatnam
Vizianagaram
Bicholim
Cuncolim
Kundaim
Sanguem
Tuem
Kozhikode
Cuddalore
Kakinada
Silvassa
Amona
Assanora
Honda
Haldia
Anklesvar
Berhampur
Tirupati
Codli
Panaji
Rajkot
Surat
Margao
Paradeep
Tuticorin
Tilamol
Balasore
Ponda
Baldevi
Andhra Pradesh Dadra & Nagar Haveli and Daman & Diu Goa Gujarat MaharashtraOdisha Tamilnadu
West Bengal
Among the 69 industrial cities under NAMP, PM2.5 is monitored at 35 cities and among these 17 cities in
the industrial / residential exceed the NAAQS of 40 µg/m3 (Figure 6.7).
150 Figure 6.7: Ambient Air Quality in Industrial Cities w.r.t PM2.5
50
0
Vadodara
Kanpur
Delhi
Vapi
Singrauli
Angul
Asansol
Parwanoo
Tuticorin
Howrah
Vishakhapatnam
Bangalore
Indore
Coimbatore
Cuddalore
Dewas
Vijaywada
Korba
Jharsuguda
Agra
Noida
Haldia
Durg-Bhillainagar
Anklesvar
Gwalior
Prithampur
Talcher
Durgapur
Rajkot
Surat
Ahmedabad
Paradeep
Patencheru
Ghaziabad
Bidar
Andhra Pradesh
Chattisgarh Delhi Gujarat Himachal Pradesh
Karnataka Madhya Pradesh Odisha Tamilnadu Telangana Uttar Pradesh West Bengal
54
Chapter 6: Air quality wrt. PM2.5 - 2019
Among the 53 million plus cities, PM2.5 is monitored at 28 cities and among these 10 cities in the
industrial / residential and 1 city in ecologically sensitive area exceed the NAAQS of 40 µg/m3 (Figure
6.8). Out of these million plus cities 7 cities are industrial cities.
Figure 6.8: Ambient Air Quality in Million Plus Cities w.r.t PM2.5
150
50
0
Vadodara
Durg-Bhillainagar
Kanpur
Delhi
Surat
Bhopal
Mumbai
Chennai
Asansol
Chandigarh
Ahmedabad
Vishakhapatnam
Bangalore
Kozhikode
Indore
Coimbatore
Vijaywada
Agra
Kolkata
Trichy
Gwalior
Nagpur
Rajkot
Hyderabad
Ghaziabad
Andhra Pradesh
Chandigarh
ChattisgarhDelhi Gujarat KarnatakaKerala Madhya Pradesh Maharashtra Tamilnadu Telangana Uttar Pradesh West Bengal
Among the 122 Non- attainment cities, PM2.5 is monitored at 57 cities and among these 23 cities in the
industrial / residential and 1 city in ecologically sensitive area exceed the NAAQS of 40 µg/m3 (Figure
6.9). Out of these million plus cities 7 cities are industrial cities.
Figure 6.9: Ambient Air Quality in Non- Attainment Cities w.r.t PM2.5
150
100
75
50
25
0
Raja hm undry/…
Agr a
Anantapur
Muzaffarpur
Sunder Naga r
Cuttack
Ta lcher
Sanga reddy
Kur nool
Delhi
Mum bai
Chandig arh
Ahmedabad
Jamm u
Tuticorin
Gha ziabad
Devanag ere
Dewa s
Barra ckpore
Nellore
Ongole
Bangal ore
Indor e
Kadapa
Vija ywada
Kor ba
Vadodara
Rour kela
Noida
Haldia
Kolk ata
Visha khapatnam
Vizianagaram
Chitoor
Guntur
Srikakulam
Gwali or
Sag ar
Nagpur
Bhubneshwar
Kanpur
Durg apur
Guwahati
Damtal
Bhopal
Angul
Tr ichy
Asansol
Surat
Parwanoo
Eluru
Hubli-Dha rwad
Hyderabad
Patencheru
Howrah
Bala sore
55
Chapter 7 : Air quality trend in million-plus cities
In India as per Census of India 2011 urban area or town is defined as; 1. All places with a municipality,
corporation, cantonment board or notified town area committee, etc. 2. All other places which satisfied the
following criteria: i) A minimum population of 5,000; ii) At least 75 per cent of the male main working
population engaged in non-agricultural pursuits; and iii) A density of population of at least 400 persons
per sq. km.
The first category of urban units is known as Statutory Towns. These towns are notified under law by the
concerned State/UT Government and have local bodies like municipal corporations, municipalities,
municipal committees, etc., irrespective of their demographic characteristics as reckoned on 31st
December 2009. Examples: Vadodara (M Corp.), Shimla (M Corp.) etc. The second category of Towns
(as in item 2 above) is known as Census Town. These were identified on the basis of Census 2001 data.
In India as per Census 2011 an Urban Agglomeration (UA is a continuous urban spread constituting a
town and its adjoining outgrowths (OGs), or two or more physically contiguous towns together with or
without outgrowths of such towns. An Urban Agglomeration must consist of at least a statutory town and
its total population (i.e. all the constituents put together) should not be less than 20,000 as per the 2001
Census. In varying local conditions, there were similar other combinations which have been treated as
urban agglomerations satisfying the basic condition of contiguity. Examples: Greater Mumbai UA, Delhi
UA, etc.
An Out Growth (OG) is a viable unit such as a village or a hamlet or an enumeration block made up of
such village or hamlet and clearly identifiable in terms of its boundaries and location. Some of the
examples are railway colony, university campus, port area, military camps, etc., which have come up near
a statutory town outside its statutory limits but within the revenue limits of a village or villages contiguous
to the town. While determining the outgrowth of a town, it has been ensured that it possesses the urban
features in terms of infrastructure and amenities such as pucca roads, electricity, taps, drainage system
for disposal of waste water etc. educational institutions, post offices, medical facilities, banks etc. and
physically contiguous with the core town of the UA. Examples: Central Railway Colony (OG), Triveni
Nagar (N.E.C.S.W.) (OG), etc. Each such town together with its outgrowth(s) is treated as an integrated
urban area and is designated as an ‘urban agglomeration’. In the 2011 Census, 475 places with 981 OGs
have been identified as Urban Agglomerations as against 384 UAs with 962 OGs in 2001 Census.
The constant growth and industrialization leads to increase in pollution. An inventory of air pollutants is a
necessary first step towards control of air pollution. Air pollutants can be natural or may be the result of
various anthropogenic activities like industrial emissions. Further the air pollutants can be primary or
secondary depending upon their formation mechanism. Primary pollutants are directly emitted from the
source and secondary pollutants are formed in the atmosphere. Meteorological factors play a critical role in
ambient concentrations of air pollutants. Even though the total discharge of air pollutants into the
atmosphere may remain constant, the ambient concentrations of air pollutants may vary depending upon
the meteorological conditions. According to Census of India, 2011 conducted by the office of the Register
General and Census Commissioner, India under Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India the total
urban population in the country is more than 377 million constituting 31.16% of the total population.
56
Chapter 7 : Air quality trend in million-plus cities
Class I UAs/Towns are the UAs/Towns which have at least 1,00,000 persons as population. At the Census
2011, there are 468 such UAs/Towns. The corresponding number in Census 2001 was 394.
Million Plus/UAs/Towns have One million or above population which are the major urban centres in the
country. 160.7 million persons (or 42.6% of the urban population) live in these Million Plus UAs/Cities.
In the above cities ambient air quality monitoring is required to determine the existing quality of air,
evaluation of the effectiveness of control programme and to identify areas in need of restoration and their
prioritization. This chapter gives an insight into the trends of air pollutants for SO2, NO2, PM10 and PM2.5 in
the 53 million plus cities (population ≥ 10 lakh or 1 million; Census 2011). An analysis of five years data
reveals a stable trend of SO2 within the NAAQS. This may be attributed to various interventions that have
taken place in recent years such as reduction in sulphur in diesel, use of cleaner fuel such as CNG in metro
cities, change in domestic fuel from coal to LPG etc. NO2 concentration has remained more or less stable in
most of the cities over the years despite increase in sources like vehicles. The reason for this may be
various intervention measures that have taken place such as improvement in vehicle technology and other
vehicular pollution control measures like alternate fuel etc. PM10 concentration shows fluctuating trend.
Vehicular emission is a major source of PM10. Increasing number of vehicles may be a reason for this trend.
The other reasons being emission from gensets, small scale industries, biomass incineration, suspension of
traffic dust, natural dust, commercial and domestic use of fuel etc.
7.1 Ambient air quality stations in million-plus cities under NAMP during 2019
There are of 264 stations in million plus cities during 2019 (258 in Residential / industrial / rural /
commercial areas and 6 in ecologically sensitive area. The analysis of air quality in metropolitan cities /
million plus cities with respect to SO2 reveals all the cities are within the NAAQS. With respect to NO2, 8
cities, PM10, 44 cities and PM2.5 10 cities exceed the NAAQS (Table 7.1). The air quality status in the
metropolitan cities is given in Table 7.2.
57
Chapter 7 : Air quality trend in million-plus cities
58
Chapter 7 : Air quality trend in million-plus cities
NB. Agra (Taj-Trapezium) is in Ecologically sensitive area. The rest fall under Residential / industrial / rural / other areas
NAAQS (annual): SO2=50 µg/m3, NO2=40 µg/m3, PM10=60 µg/m3, PM2.5 = 40 µg/m3 (Residential / industrial / rural / other areas) and
SO2=20 µg/m3, NO2=30 µg/m3, PM10=60 µg/m3, PM2.5 = 40 µg/m3 (Ecologically sensitive area)
RIRuO-Residential / industrial / rural / other areas, ESA- Ecologically sensitive area, N-North, E-East, W-West, S-South, NE-North
East, C-Central, Co-Coastal cities, I-industrial, MP-milliion plus cities, NAC- Non attainment cities on the basis of 2014- 18 data.
SO2-Sulphur Dioxide, NO2-Nitrogen Dioxide, PM10-Particulate matter of aerodynamic size ≤10 micrometer in diameter,
59
Chapter 7 : Air quality trend in million-plus cities
Vijaywada Vishakhapatnam
Patna Chandigarh
60
Chapter 7 : Air quality trend in million-plus cities
7.3.4 CHATTISGARH
Durg-Bhillainagar Raipur
Delhi
61
Chapter 7 : Air quality trend in million-plus cities
7.3.6 GUJARAT
Ahmedabad Rajkot
Surat Vadodara
62
Chapter 7 : Air quality trend in million-plus cities
Faridabad Srinagar
7.3.9 JHARKHAND
Dhanbad Jamshedpur
63
Chapter 7 : Air quality trend in million-plus cities
7.3.10 KARNATAKA
Ranchi Bangalore
7.3.11 KERALA
Kochi Kollam
64
Chapter 7 : Air quality trend in million-plus cities
Kozhikode Mallapuram
Thiruvananthapuram Trissur
65
Chapter 7 : Air quality trend in million-plus cities
Bhopal Gwalior
Indore Jabalpur
66
Chapter 7 : Air quality trend in million-plus cities
7.3.13 MAHARASHTRA
Aurangabad Mumbai
Nagpur Nashik
67
Chapter 7 : Air quality trend in million-plus cities
Pune Thane
7.3.14 PUNJAB
Amritsar Ludhiana
68
Chapter 7 : Air quality trend in million-plus cities
7.3.15 RAJASTHAN
Jaipur Jodhpur
Kota
69
Chapter 7 : Air quality trend in million-plus cities
7.3.16 TAMILNADU
Chennai Coimbatore
Madurai Trichy
70
Chapter 7 : Air quality trend in million-plus cities
Hyderabad Agra
Allahabad Ghaziabad
71
Chapter 7 : Air quality trend in million-plus cities
Kanpur Lucknow
Meerut Varanasi
72
Chapter 7 : Air quality trend in million-plus cities
Asansol Kolkata
73
Chapter 8: Continuous Ambient Air Quality Monitoring
Air quality is a major concern worldwide. Therefore, the knowledge on instantaneous air quality
(real-time) has become a need for the society. This has been possible with the Continuous
Ambient Air Quality Monitoring System (CAAQMS) which monitors pollutants using different
analyzers and working principles, thereby, generating, transmitting and displaying data within
minutes, reducing the chances of manual error. Further, awareness of daily levels of air
pollution is important to the citizens, especially for those who suffer from illnesses caused by
exposure to air pollution.
Central Pollution Control Board has notified 4th version of National Ambient Air Quality
Standards (NAAQS) - 2009 in which 12 set of health based parameters were notified. This
necessitated the requirement of monitoring these parameters at National level with the notified
methods. Therefore, the present NAAQS required an integrated system of monitoring i.e. it is a
combination of Continuous Ambient Air Quality Monitoring System (CAAQMS) and manual
monitoring system as the real time system can handle only 08 set of parameters. Since, the
inauguration of National Air Quality Index (NAQI) - a tool for effective dissemination of air quality
information to the public, by Hon’ble Prime Minister, the necessity of real time data was felt to
generate the daily NAQI of cities. The instantaneous data therefore, is more relevant for
depicting real-time generic information in the form of National Air Quality Index (AQI).
The CAAQMS network has got paced in the country to generate the real time air quality data,
which is not only essential for publishing AQI, but also capable of providing (i) continuous flow of
information, (ii) warning at critical period, (iii) trend analysis of any selective interval, (iv) quality
data generation with minimizing human error, etc. Therefore, this real-time data displayed at
respective locations, not only bring about a participation of general public in the prevention &
control of air pollution at respective area of activity but also links with the authorities in
respective areas, helping in quick policy decisions and intervention.
8.1 Continuous Ambient Air Quality Monitoring System
A Continuous Ambient Air Quality Monitoring System is a specialised system that is housed in a
temperature controlled container/room and is equipped for monitoring of ambient air pollutants
using different analyzers. The real time data generated through this system is transferred to
Central Server and also to digital display board for public viewing. The data of these CAAQMS
are being used for generating the daily National Air Quality Index (NAQI) of the cities.
CAAQM Station
A Continuous Ambient Air
Quality Monitoring System is a
specialised system is equipped
for monitoring of ambient air
pollutants and transmit the real
time data to the Central Server.
This data is used for
computation of daily National
Air Quality Index of the cities.
74
Chapter 8: Continuous Ambient Air Quality Monitoring
The CAAQM stations are also equipped with sensors to measure meteorological parameters
such as Wind Speed, Wind Direction, Ambient Temperature, Relative Humidity, Solar Radiation
and Rainfall.
CAAQM stations provide real time data which enables assessment of extent of pollution in real
time. The analyser used for measurement are USEPA/TUV/MCERTS certified. For quality data
generation, the analyzers are calibrated using certified reference standards (NIST certified
Gases/NIST certified Foil Gauges for Particulate Matter). Performance audit of CAAQM stations
are carried out once in a year by third party. The CAAQM station operated by CPCB are also
under NABL accreditation as per ISO 17025:2005.
Regulators
Policy makers
Central Server Researchers
/ Cloud Scientists
Others
Worldwide AQ Databases
AQI for citizens
Online Data Transfer
CAAQM System
No. of
S.No. State City Station Name
stations
Amaravati Secretariat, Amaravati - APPCB 1
Rajamahendravaram Anand Kala Kshetram, Rajamahendravaram - APPCB 1
Tirupati Tirumala, Tirupati - APPCB 1
1 Andhra Pradesh
Vijayawada PWD Grounds, Vijayawada - APPCB 1
APIIC Kancharapalem, Visakhapatnam – APPCB
Visakhapatnam 2
GVM Corporation, Visakhapatnam - APPCB
2 Assam Guwahati Railway Colony, Guwahati - APCB 1
Gaya Collectorate, Gaya - BSPCB 1
Muzaffarpur Muzaffarpur Collectorate,Muzaffarpur – BSPCB 1
IGSC Planetarium Complex, Patna - BSPCB
3 Bihar
Muradpur, Patna - BSPCB
Patna
Rajbansi Nagar, Patna - BSPCB 4
Samanpura, Patna - BSPCB
4 Chandigarh Chandigarh Sector-25, Chandigarh - CPCC 1
Alipur- DPCC
Anand Vihar, Delhi - DPCC
Ashok Vihar, Delhi - DPCC
Aya Nagar, New Delhi - IMD
Bawana- DPCC
Burari Crossing, New Delhi - IMD
5 Delhi Delhi CRRI Mathura Road, New Delhi - IMD 38
Dr. Karni Singh Shooting Range, Delhi - DPCC
DTU, New Delhi - CPCB
Dwarka-Sector 8, Delhi - DPCC
Mundaka-DPCC
IGI Airport Terminal - 3, New Delhi - IMD
76
Chapter 8: Continuous Ambient Air Quality Monitoring
No. of
S.No. State City Station Name
stations
IHBAS, Dilshad Garden,New Delhi - CPCB
ITO, New Delhi - CPCB
Jahangirpuri, Delhi - DPCC
Jawaharlal Nehru Stadium, Delhi - DPCC
Lodhi Road, New Delhi - IMD
Major Dhyan Chand National Stadium, Delhi - DPCC
Mandir Marg, New Delhi - DPCC
Najafgarh, Delhi - DPCC
Narela, Delhi - DPCC
Nehru Nagar, Delhi - DPCC
North Campus, DU, New Delhi - IMD
NSIT Dwarka, New Delhi - CPCB
Okhla Phase-2, Delhi - DPCC
Patparganj, Delhi - DPCC
Punjabi Bagh, Delhi - DPCC
Pitampura Delhi- IMD
Pusa, New Delhi – DPCC
Pusa, New Delhi - IMD
R K Puram, New Delhi - DPCC
Rohini, Delhi - DPCC
Shadipur, New Delhi - CPCB
Sirifort, New Delhi - CPCB
Sonia Vihar, Delhi - DPCC
Sri Aurobindo Marg- DPCC
Vivek Vihar, Delhi - DPCC
Wazirpur, Delhi - DPCC
Ahmedabad Maninagar, Ahmedabad - GPCB 1
Ankleshwar GIDC, Ankleshwar - GPCB 1
6 Gujarat Gandhinagar Sector-10, Gandhinagar - GPCB 1
Vapi Phase-1 GIDC, Vapi - GPCB 1
Vatva Phase-4 GIDC, Vatva - GPCB 1
Ambala Patti Mehar, Ambala - HSPCB 1
Bahadurgarh Arya Nagar, Bahadurgarh - HSPCB 1
Ballabgarh Nathu Colony, Ballabgarh - HSPCB 1
Bhiwani H.B. Colony, Bhiwani - HSPCB 1
Dharuhera Municipal Corporation Office, Dharuhera - HSPCB 1
Faridabad Sector- 16A, Faridabad - HSPCB 1
Fatehabad Huda Sector, Fatehabad - HSPCB 1
7 Haryana
NISE Gwal Pahari, Gurugram - IMD
Gurugram 2
Vikas Sadan, Gurugram - HSPCB
Hisar Urban Estate-II, Hisar - HSPCB 1
Jind Police Lines, Jind - HSPCB 1
Kaithal Rishi Nagar, Kaithal - HSPCB 1
Karnal Sector-12, Karnal - HSPCB 1
Kurukshetra Sector-7, Kurukshetra - HSPCB 1
77
Chapter 8: Continuous Ambient Air Quality Monitoring
No. of
S.No. State City Station Name
stations
Mandikhera General Hospital, Mandikhera - HSPCB 1
Manesar Sector-2 IMT, Manesar - HSPCB 1
Narnaul Shastri Nagar, Narnaul - HSPCB 1
Palwal Shyam Nagar, Palwal - HSPCB 1
Panchkula Sector-6, Panchkula - HSPCB 1
Panipat Sector-18, Panipat - HSPCB 1
Rohtak MD University, Rohtak - HSPCB 1
Sirsa F-Block, Sirsa - HSPCB 1
Sonipat Murthal, Sonipat - HSPCB 1
Yamuna Nagar Gobind Pura, Yamuna Nagar - HSPCB 1
8 Jharkhand Jorapokhar Tata Stadium, Jorapokhar - JSPCB 1
BTM Layout, Bengaluru - CPCB
BWSSB Kadabesanahalli, Bengaluru - CPCB
Bapuji Nagar, Bengaluru - KSPCB
City Railway Station, Bengaluru - KSPCB
Hebbal, Bengaluru - KSPCB
Bengaluru 10
Hombegowda Nagar, Bengaluru - KSPCB
Jayanagar 5th Block, Bengaluru - KSPCB
Peenya, Bengaluru - CPCB
9 Karnataka Sanegurava Halli, Bengaluru - KSPCB
Silk Board, Bengaluru - KSPCB
Chamarajanagar Urban, Chamarajanagar – KSPCB 1
Chikkaballapur Chikkaballapur Rural- KSPCB 1
Hubballi Deshpande Nagar, Hubballi - KSPCB 1
Kalaburagi Lal Bahadur Shastri Nagar- KSPCB 1
Mysuru Hebbal 1st Stage, Mysuru - KSPCB 1
Ramanagara Vijay Nagar, Ramanagara - KSPCB 1
Yadgir Collector Office, Yadgir - KSPCB 1
Eloor Udyogamandal, Eloor - Kerala PCB 1
10 Kerala
Thiruvananthapuram Plammoodu, Thiruvananthapuram - Kerala PCB 1
Bhopal T T Nagar, Bhopal - MPPCB 1
Damoh Shrivastav Colony, Damoh - MPPCB 1
Dewas Bhopal Chauraha, Dewas - MPPCB 1
Maihar Sahilara, Maihar - KJS Cements 1
Indore Chhoti Gwaltoli, Indore - MPPCB 1
Jabalpur Marhatal, Jabalpur - MPPCB 1
Madhya Pradesh Katni Gole Bazar, Katni - MPPCB 1
11
Mandideep Sector-D Industrial Area, Mandideep - MPPCB 1
Pithampur Sector-2 Industrial Area, Pithampur - MPPCB 1
Ratlam Shasthri Nagar, Ratlam - IPCA Lab 1
Satna Bandhavgar Colony, Satna - MPPCB 1
Singrauli Vindhyachal STPS, Singrauli - MPPCB 1
Ujjain Mahakaleshwar Temple, Ujjain - MPPCB 1
Aurangabad More Chowk Waluj, Aurangabad - MPCB 1
Chandrapur, Chandrapur - MPCB
Chandrapur 2
12 Maharashtra MIDC Khutala, Chandrapur - MPCB
Kalyan Khadakpada, Kalyan - MPCB 1
Mumbai Bandra, Mumbai - MPCB 1
78
Chapter 8: Continuous Ambient Air Quality Monitoring
No. of
S.No. State City Station Name
stations
Borivali East, Mumbai - MPCB 1
Chhatrapati Shivaji Intl. Airport (T2), Mumbai - MPCB 1
Colaba, Mumbai - MPCB 1
Kurla, Mumbai - MPCB 1
Powai, Mumbai - MPCB 1
Sion, Mumbai - MPCB 1
Vasai West, Mumbai – MPCB 1
Vile Parle West, Mumbai – MPCB 1
Worli, Mumbai - MPCB 1
Nagpur Opp GPO Civil Lines, Nagpur - MPCB 1
Nashik Gangapur Road, Nashik - MPCB 1
Airoli, Navi Mumbai - MPCB 1
Navi Mumbai Mahape, Navi Mumbai - MPCB 1
Nerul, Navi Mumbai - MPCB 1
Pune Karve Road, Pune - MPCB 1
Solapur Solapur, Solapur - MPCB 1
Thane Pimpleshwar Mandir, Thane - MPCB 1
13 Meghalaya Shillong Lumpyngngad, Shillong - Meghalaya PCB 1
Brajrajnagar GM Office, Brajrajnagar - OSPCB 1
14 Odisha
Talcher Talcher Coalfields,Talcher - OSPCB 1
Amritsar Golden Temple, Amritsar - PPCB 1
Bathinda Hardev Nagar, Bathinda - PPCB 1
Jalandhar Civil Line, Jalandhar - PPCB 1
Khanna Kalal Majra, Khanna - PPCB 1
15 Punjab
Ludhiana Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana - PPCB 1
Mandi Gobindgarh RIMT University, Mandi Gobindgarh - PPCB 1
Patiala Model Town, Patiala - PPCB 1
Rupnagar Ratanpura, Rupnagar - PPCB 1
Alwar Moti Doongri, Alwar, Rajasthan - RSPCB 1
Ajmer Civil Lines, Ajmer - RSPCB 1
Bhiwadi RIICO Ind. Area III, Bhiwadi, Rajasthan - RSPCB 1
Adarsh Nagar, Jaipur - RSPCB
Jaipur Police Commissionerate, Jaipur - RSPCB 3
16 Rajasthan
Shastri Nagar, Jaipur - RSPCB
Jodhpur Collectorate, Jodhpur - RSPCB 1
Kota Shrinath Puram, Kota - RSPCB 1
Pali Indira Colony Vistar, Pali - RSPCB 1
Udaipur Ashok Nagar, Udaipur - RSPCB 1
Alandur Bus Depot, Chennai - CPCB
Manali Village, Chennai - TNPCB
Chennai 4
17 Tamil Nadu Manali, Chennai - CPCB
Velachery Res. Area, Chennai - CPCB
Coimbatore SIDCO Kurichi, Coimbatore - TNPCB 1
Bollaram Industrial Area, Hyderabad - TSPCB
Central University, Hyderabad - TSPCB
18 Telangana Hyderabad ICRISAT Patancheru, Hyderabad - TSPCB 6
IDA Pashamylaram, Hyderabad - TSPCB
Sanathnagar, Hyderabad - TSPCB
79
Chapter 8: Continuous Ambient Air Quality Monitoring
No. of
S.No. State City Station Name
stations
Zoo Park, Hyderabad - TSPCB
Agra Sanjay Palace, Agra - UPPCB 1
Baghpat New Collectorate- UPPCB 1
Bulandshahr Yamunapuram, Bulandshahr - UPPCB 1
Indirapuram, Ghaziabad - UPPCB
Loni, Ghaziabad - UPPCB 4
Ghaziabad
Sanjay Nagar, Ghaziabad - UPPCB
Vasundhara, Ghaziabad - UPPCB
Knowledge Park - III, Greater Noida - UPPCB 1
Greater Noida
Knowledge Park - V, Greater Noida - UPPCB 1
Hapur Anand Vihar, Hapur –UPPCB 1
Kanpur Nehru Nagar, Kanpur - UPPCB 1
Central School, Lucknow - CPCB
Gomti Nagar, Lucknow - UPPCB
19 Uttar Pradesh
Lucknow Lalbagh, Lucknow - CPCB 5
Nishant Ganj, Lucknow – UPPCB
Talkatora District Industries Center, Lucknow - CPCB
Ganga Nagar, Meerut - UPPCB
Meerut Jai Bhim Nagar, Meerut - UPPCB 3
Pallavpuram Phase 2, Meerut - UPPCB
Moradabad Lajpat Nagar, Moradabad - UPPCB 1
Muzaffarnagar New Mandi, Muzaffarnagar - UPPCB 1
Sector - 125, Noida - UPPCB
Sector - 62, Noida - IMD
Noida 4
Sector-1, Noida - UPPCB
Sector-116, Noida - UPPCB
Varanasi Ardhali Bazar, Varanasi - UPPCB 1
Asanol Asanol Court Area, Asanol - WBPCB 1
Durgapur Sidhu Kanhu Indoor Stadium, Durgapur – WBPCB 1
Haldia Haldia, Haldia - WBPCB 1
Belur Math, Howrah - WBPCB
Howrah Ghusuri, Howrah - WBPCB 3
Padmapukur, Howrah - WBPCB
Ballygunge, Kolkata - WBPCB
20 West Bengal
Bidhannagar, Kolkata - WBPCB
Fort William, Kolkata - WBPCB
Kolkata Jadavpur, Kolkata - WBPCB 7
Rabindra Bharati University, Kolkata - WBPCB
Rabindra Sarobar, Kolkata - WBPCB
Victoria, Kolkata - WBPCB
Siliguri Ward-32 Bapupara, Siliguri - WBPCB 1
Total 20 114 208
80
Chapter 8: Continuous Ambient Air Quality Monitoring
There are 73 CAAQM stations (year 2019), installed in Delhi-NCR presented in tables below:
Operating Agency-No. of
S. No. Station Name
Stations
State: DELHI
1. DTU, New Delhi
2. ITO, New Delhi
3. IHBAS, DilshadGarden,New Delhi
CPCB-06
4. NSIT Dwarka, New Delhi
5. Shadipur, New Delhi
6. Sirifort, New Delhi
7. Alipur
8. AnandVihar, Delhi
9. Ashok Vihar, Delhi
10. Bawana
11. Dr. Karni Singh Shooting Range, Delhi
12. Dwarka-Sector 8, Delhi
13. Mundaka
14. Jahangirpuri, Delhi
15. Jawaharlal Nehru Stadium, Delhi
16. Major Dhyan Chand National Stadium, Delhi
17. MandirMarg, New Delhi
18. Najafgarh, Delhi DPCC-24
19. Narela, Delhi
20. Nehru Nagar, Delhi
21. Okhla Phase-2, Delhi
22. Patparganj, Delhi
23. Punjabi Bagh, Delhi
24. Pusa, DPCC Delhi
25. R K Puram, New Delhi
26. Rohini, Delhi
27. Sonia Vihar, Delhi
28. Sri AurobindoMarg
29. VivekVihar, Delhi
30. Wazirpur, Delhi
31. Aya Nagar, New Delhi
32. Burari Crossing, New Delhi
33. CRRI Mathura Road, New Delhi
34. IGI Airport Terminal - 3, New Delhi IMD-08
35. Lodhi Road, New Delhi
36. North Campus, DU, New Delhi
37. Pusa, New Delhi
38. Pitampura, New Delhi
Total Stations 38
81
Chapter 8: Continuous Ambient Air Quality Monitoring
82
Chapter 8: Continuous Ambient Air Quality Monitoring
National Air Quality Index (NAQI) was launched by Hon’ble Prime Minister on 6th April, 2015
with the objective for dissemination of Air Quality information to the public. Computation of AQI
is done using real-time data of Continuous Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Stations. This index
will help the people to know about the level of pollution in the ambient air on daily basis. The
AQI Display has been increased from the initial 10 cities to currently 114 cities in 20 States/UTs
of India. Total 208 Continuous Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Stations all over the country are
connected with NAQI.
The AQI consider eight pollutants (PM10, PM2.5, NO2, SO2, CO, O3, NH3, and Pb), it is calculated
only if data are available for minimum three pollutants out of which one should necessarily be
either PM2.5 or PM10. There are six AQI categories namely, Good, Satisfactory, Moderate, Poor,
Very Poor, and Severe. The AQI values and corresponding ambient concentrations (health
breakpoints) as well as associated likely health impacts are as follows:
83
Chapter 8: Continuous Ambient Air Quality Monitoring
Air Quality Index of Delhi from year 2016 to 2019 is presented in the following figure. Number of
days in each category for particular year is depicted in the chart. The chart shows that all
Good/Satisfactory/Moderate days have increased significantly and Poor/Very Poor/Severe days
in total have gone down as compared to year 2018.
Air Quality Index of 114 cities of country for year 2019 is presented in the following charts.
Number of days in each category for 2019 is depicted of cities under NAQI.
84
Chapter 8: Continuous Ambient Air Quality Monitoring
85
Chapter 8: Continuous Ambient Air Quality Monitoring
86
Chapter 9: Initiatives for control of air pollution
At present air quality monitoring network has been strengthened to 804 manual
and 231 real time stations covering 344 and 128 cities respectively. The current
manual network will be strengthened by additional 1581 manual and 800 real time
monitoring stations.
A centralized data collection and dissemination system continuously disseminates
air quality information including Air Quality Index (AQI) to the public.
In addition to present ground based air quality monitoring network alternate
monitoring methods such as Satellite based monitoring using aerosol optical depth
(AOD) is being established to supplement the regulatory monitoring network in
collaboration with IIT Delhi under a project titled “Satellite based near real time
monitoring of ambient PM2.5 at national scale for air quality management”.
Revised National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) were notified in 2009
for 12 pollutants in order to protect human and ecological health.
At present 122 non-attainment cities have been identified based on air quality data
form 2014-18 as cities which exceed National Ambient Air Quality Standards.
Particulate Matter is a major concern in non-attainment cities.
City action plans of are being implemented for 110 non-attainment cities while
actions plans are being revised for remaining 12 cities. These plans include actions
to control emissions from various city specific sources identified as per emission
inventory and source apportionment studies.
In 2019, National Clean Air Programme (NCAP) was launched by Ministry of
Environment, Forest and Climate Change with targets to achieve 20 to 30 %
reduction in PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations by 2024 across the country.
NCAP includes mainstreaming initiatives under five national missions of National
Action Plan on Climate Change (NAPCC) viz. National Solar Mission, National
Mission for Enhanced Energy Efficiency, National Mission on Sustainable Habitat,
National Mission for a Green India and National Mission for Sustainable
Agriculture.
Under NCAP ₹224.74 crores have been released to 90 cities including 28 million
plus population and 07 cities of north east region in 2019-20 for initiating priority
action.
Further, Fifteenth Finance Commission has recommended ₹4400 cores to 42
million plus cities in 2020-21 for air quality improvement including capacity building
of local bodies & State Pollution Control Boards (SPCBs).
Major sectoral interventions having direct link to air quality improvement are:
Development of low carbon strategies across sectors such as phasing out older
coal based power plants, compliance of standards, City Gas Distribution (CGD)
network, emphasis on improved power reliability in urban areas, etc.
Promotion of policies such as 5-10% use of biomass pellets with coal for power
generation in thermal power plants and 10% ethanol blending in transport fuels
by 2022.
Around 63 industry-specific emission standards have been developed or
revised for different sectors including thermal power plants. Criteria for
categorizing industries in red/orange/green/white categories have been
87
Chapter 9: Initiatives for control of air pollution
88
Chapter 10: References
REFERENCES
Epidemiological study on effect of air pollution on human health (adults) in Delhi,
http://www.cpcb.nic.in/
Census 2011 website: https://www.census2011.co.in
Health Effects Institute, Creation of an Air Pollutant Data Base for Health Effects Study, Report
Submitted to Health Effects Institute by Atmospheric and Environmental Research, Inc., 2004
http://www http://www.epa.gov/air/urbanair/co/hlth1.html.epa.gov/air/urbanair/ozone/hlth.html
http://www.epa.gov/air/airtrends/aqtrnd01/pmatter.html
http://www.epa.gov/air/oaqps/greenbk/o3co.html#ParticulateMatte
http://www.epa.gov/air/urbanair/nox/what.html (Accessed: 22/8/2007)
http://www.epa.gov/air/urbanair/pm/hlth1.html
http://www.epa.gov/iaq/voc.html
http://www.epa.gov/oar/particlepollution/health.html (Accessed on 22/8/2007)
http://www.epa.gov/oar/particlepollution/pdfs/pm-color.pdf
http://www.epa.gov/ttn/atw/allabout.html
http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/ewh-semt/pubs/air/office_building-immeubles_ bureaux/organic-
organiques_e.html
Study on ambient air quality, respiratory symptoms, and lung function of children in Delhi,
http://www.cpcb.nic.in/
United States Environmental Protection Agency, ‘Research and Development Fiscal Years 1997-
1998 Research Accomplishments, Research and Development (8101R) EPA 600-R-99-106,
Washington D.C., Dec. 1999.\
United States Environmental Protection Agency, Air Quality Criteria for Particulate matter Chapter
1, Executive Summary, EPA 600/P-95/001aF, April 1996, Website -
http://www.epa.gov/ORD/WebPubs/execsum.html
United States Environmental Protection Agency, July 1997, EPA Office of Air Quality Planning &
Standards, USEPA, Triangle Park, USA.
United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards,
National Ambient Air Quality Standards, Website:- http:// www.epa.gov/ airs/criteria.html
United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Air
Quality Where You Live, PM – How Particulate Matter Affected the Way We Live & Breathe, Health
and Environmental Impacts of PM, November 2000, Website - http://www.epa.gov/air/urbanair/pm/
hlth1.html
United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards,
Regulating Smog and Particle Air Pollution: An Integrated Approach, Information on Particulate
Matter, August 1997, Website - http://www.epa.gov/ oaqps/regusmog/infpart.html
Wilson, W.E.; Suh, H.H., “ Fine Particles and Coarse Particles: Concentration Relationships
Relevant to Epidemiologic Studies” Journal of Air & Waste Management Association, 1997, 47,
1238-1249
www.wikipedia.org/
Gordon McGranahan, Deborah Balk, and Bridget Anderson. The rising tide: assessing the risks of
climate change and human settlements in low elevation coastal zones. Environment and
Urbanization, April 2007 19: 17-37, doi:10.1177/0956247807076960
Christopher Small and Robert J. Nicholls. A Global Analysis of Human Settlement in Coastal
Zones. Journal of Coastal Research, Summer 2003 19(3): 584-599, Stable
URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4299200
89
NAAQS- 2019
ANNEXURES
51
Annexure – 1: Air pollutants, sources & effects
90
Annexure – 1: Air pollutants, sources & effects
91
Annexure – 1: Air pollutants, sources & effects
Ozone(O3) ozone is present formed by the reaction of lung function deficits Ozone cracking in car
Ozone is a pale blue gas, soluble in the sunlight on air containing respiratory illness tires, gaskets, O-rings
in water and non-polar solvents atmosphere in hydrocarbons and nitrogen premature death, asthma, is caqused by attack
with specific sharp odor the stratosphere, oxides emitted by car bronchitis, heart attack, of ozone on any
somewhat resembling chlorine in a region also engines, industrial operations, and other polymer possessing
bleach. known as the chemical solvents to form cardiopulmonary olefinic or double
Ozone is a secondary pollutants ozone layer ozone problems. bonds within its chain
formed in the atmosphere by between about electronic equipment such as ground-level ozone and structure,
reaction between oxides of 10 km and photocopiers pollution which interferes ozone present in the
nitrogen and volatile organic 50 km above the with photosynthesis and upper troposphere
compounds (VOCs) in the surface stunts overall growth of acts as a greenhouse
presence of sunlight. Peak O3 some plant species gas, absorbing some
92
Annexure – 1: Air pollutants, sources & effects
93
Annexure – 1: Air pollutants, sources & effects
94
Annexure – 1: Air pollutants, sources & effects
95
Annexure – 1: Air pollutants, sources & effects
96
Annexure – 2: National Ambient Air Quality Standard
97
Annexure 3: Location wise SO2 - 2019
Levels of Sulphur Dioxide (SO2) in locations / Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Stations under
NAMP during 2019
Standard
Monitored
(24-hourly
(24-hourly
Maximum
Exceeding
Minimum
State / UT City Location
average)
average)
Average
NAAQS
Annual
deviation
98
Annexure 3: Location wise SO2 - 2019
Standard
Monitored
(24-hourly
(24-hourly
Maximum
Exceeding
Minimum
State / UT City Location
average)
average)
Average
NAAQS
Annual
deviation
Bridge
APIIC, Kushalapuram 5 15 8 95 0 2
Muncipal corporation Office, Old Bustand 5 12 8 107 0 1
Regional Science Centre, Chittoor Bypass 4 6 5 106 0 0
Municipal Office, Tilak Road 4 8 5 107 0 0
APPCB-Regional Office, 1st Floor, APSFC
Tirupati 4 6 5 100 0 0
Building, NT road
Sri Venkateswara Guest House (TTD SV Rest
4 8 5 108 0 0
House), Near APSRTC Bus Stand
NTR Veterinary college of sciences,
4 11 5 107 0 1
Gannavaram
VR Siddhartha Engineering college , Kanuru 4 6 5 107 0 0
APIIC, IALA, IDA, Kondaplli 4 6 5 106 0 0
Benz Circle 4 7 5 107 0 0
Autonagar 4 7 5 108 0 0
Vijaywada Police Control Room 5 6 5 89 0 0
A.P. Pollution Control Board, plot no. 41, Sri
Kanakadurga Officers colony, Gurunank 4 7 5 108 0 0
Road
Gram Panchayat Office, Yenamalakuduru 4 6 5 108 0 0
Indian Medical Association Hall,Eluru Road,
4 6 5 107 0 0
Governorpet
Industrial Estate, Marripalem 5 13 9 108 0 2
Panchayat Raj office, Mindi 5 11 8 105 0 1
Police Barracks 6 14 9 105 0 2
INS-Virabahu, Naval Area 5 10 7 93 0 1
Vishakhapatnam Seethammadhara 5 13 8 99 0 1
Ganapuram Area 6 13 9 107 0 2
Pedagantyada (V), Gajuwada (M) 5 11 8 104 0 1
CWMP, RAMKY, Parawada 5 14 9 106 0 2
MVP Raitu Bajar 5 15 7 102 0 1
Industrial Growth Centre, APIIC Building at
5 12 8 101 0 1
IDA Bobbili
Vizianagaram APIIC Building, VT Agraharam,Industrial area 5 14 8 105 0 2
Muncipal Kaspa High School 6 12 8 102 0 1
Municipal Office 5 13 8 93 0 2
Arunachal Itnagar PCCF's Office Compound 2 10 3 43 0 2
Pradesh Naharlagun APSPCB Office compound 2 6 3 34 0 1
Oil India Ltd. PS-6, Chirang 3 12 4 70 0 1
Bongaigaon
Barpara Office Building 3 11 4 86 0 1
BATAD, Sandoop Jhankar town of Bhutan,
Daranga 4 11 7 94 0 1
Baska
Dibrugarh Dibrugarh Office Building 4 9 5 89 0 1
Golaghat Golaghat Office Building 4 8 6 80 0 1
Head Office, Bamunimaidam 7 24 12 134 0 3
Boragaon, IASST, Kamrup 5 12 7 114 0 1
Guwahati University, Kamrup 5 11 7 117 0 1
Guwahati
ITI Building, Gopinath Nagar 5 12 7 117 0 1
Khanapara, Central Dairy, Kamrup 5 15 7 129 0 1
Near Pragjyotish College, Santipur 5 11 7 133 0 1
Margherita Coal India Office 4 9 6 91 0 1
Assam
Water Resources Div., Christian Patty,
Nagaon 5 10 7 97 0 1
Nagaon College
PWD Rural Div Office Complex, near Gordon
Nalbari 4 10 7 77 0 1
Boy's GS School
North Lakhimpur Bazar Patti, North Lakhimpur Town 5 10 7 86 0 1
Govt. Boys HS School, Janiganj 5 8 6 74 0 1
Silchar
RLO, Ithkola Market, Ghaniwala Road 5 9 7 75 0 1
Sibasagar Office Building 4 8 6 102 0 1
Sivasagar
Usha Lodge, near ONGCL Colony 5 9 7 103 0 1
Tezpur Tezpur Office Building 6 10 7 86 0 1
Digboi Carbon factory Campus, Borguri 4 8 6 94 0 1
Tinsukia Shreepuria, Borguri 4 8 6 98 0 1
Shivdham 4 9 6 98 0 1
99
Annexure 3: Location wise SO2 - 2019
Standard
Monitored
(24-hourly
(24-hourly
Maximum
Exceeding
Minimum
State / UT City Location
average)
average)
Average
NAAQS
Annual
deviation
100
Annexure 3: Location wise SO2 - 2019
Standard
Monitored
(24-hourly
(24-hourly
Maximum
Exceeding
Minimum
State / UT City Location
average)
average)
Average
NAAQS
Annual
deviation
101
Annexure 3: Location wise SO2 - 2019
Standard
Monitored
(24-hourly
(24-hourly
Maximum
Exceeding
Minimum
State / UT City Location
average)
average)
Average
NAAQS
Annual
deviation
102
Annexure 3: Location wise SO2 - 2019
Standard
Monitored
(24-hourly
(24-hourly
Maximum
Exceeding
Minimum
State / UT City Location
average)
average)
Average
NAAQS
Annual
deviation
103
Annexure 3: Location wise SO2 - 2019
Standard
Monitored
(24-hourly
(24-hourly
Maximum
Exceeding
Minimum
State / UT City Location
average)
average)
Average
NAAQS
Annual
deviation
104
Annexure 3: Location wise SO2 - 2019
Standard
Monitored
(24-hourly
(24-hourly
Maximum
Exceeding
Minimum
State / UT City Location
average)
average)
Average
NAAQS
Annual
deviation
105
Annexure 3: Location wise SO2 - 2019
Standard
Monitored
(24-hourly
(24-hourly
Maximum
Exceeding
Minimum
State / UT City Location
average)
average)
Average
NAAQS
Annual
deviation
Aspal Khurd
4 8 5 123 0 1
(Tapa) Vill:Aspal Khurd, Teh:Tapa
Bara Pind
4 11 7 83 0 1
(Goraya) Vill:Bara Pind, Teh:Goraya
Bhatinda Bathinda Milk Producers, Dabwali Road 2 8 5 81 0 1
Binjon
4 24 7 80 0 2
(Garshankar) CHC, Vill:Binjon, Teh: Garshankar
Bishanpura Longowalia Yarns (Unit-II), Vill-Bishanpura,
4 20 10 93 0 4
(Payal) Teh: Payal
Changal
4 7 5 107 0 1
(Sangrur) Mastuana Sahib, Vill:Changal, Teh:Sangrur
Chowkimann Ludhiana College of Engineering,
4 12 7 102 0 1
(Jagraon) Vill:Chowkimann, Teh:Jagraon
Dera Baba Nanak C-PYTE Building 3 9 7 68 0 1
Punjab Chem and Crop Protection,
4 8 6 107 0 1
Dera Bassi Bhanakarpur Rd
Winsome Yarns Ltd., Barwala Road 4 7 5 113 0 1
Fatehpur Baba Banda Singh Bahadur College,
4 7 5 38 0 1
(Samana) Vill:Fatehpur, Teh:Samana
Modi Oil and General Mills, Mandi 6 9 7 126 0 1
Gobindgarh Raj Steel Rolling Mills, Mandi 5 9 7 133 0 1
United Rolling Mills, Mandi Gobindgarh 5 9 7 130 0 1
Guru Ki Dhab Vil:Guru Ki Dhab / Basti Himmatpura,
2 8 5 22 0 2
(Kotkapura) Teh:Kotkapura
Jaito Sarja Royal Nursing College, Vill: Jaito Sarja, Teh:
4 7 6 37 0 1
(Batala) Batala
Municipal Council Tubewell No. 27 8 24 12 81 0 2
Regional Office 9 23 11 73 0 2
Jalandhar
Punjab Maltex , Kapurthala Road 5 20 10 59 0 3
Focal Point 8 15 12 63 0 1
Markfed Vanaspati, Khanna 5 25 10 112 0 3
Khanna
AS School, Khanna 5 64 13 117 0 11
Kharaori
4 8 6 126 0 1
(Sirhind) Vill:Kharaori, Teh:Sirhind
Kotladoom Satyam College, Ramtirath Road, Vill:
5 8 7 62 0 1
(Ajnala) Kotladoom, Teh: Ajnala
Lakho ke Behram
Vill:Lakho ke Behram, Teh:Ferozpur 3 6 11 0 1
(Ferozpur)
Bharat Nagar Chowk / RO Gill Road 6 20 11 120 0 3
Nahar Spining Mlls, Dholewal Chawk 6 49 14 124 0 7
Ludhiana
Ludhiana Coop. Milk Producer, Ferozpur Rd 5 40 10 136 0 7
PPCB Office Building, Vishavkarma Chowk 6 64 13 131 0 9
Mrar Kalan
Vill: Mrar Kalan, Teh:Muktsar 4 9 5 40 0 1
(Muktsar)
Mukandpur Govt. Senior Sec. School, Vill:Mukandpur,
5 12 8 78 0 1
(Nawashahar) Teh:Nawashahar
Mureedke
4 10 7 98 0 1
(Batala) Johal Farm, Vill: Mureedke, Teh: Batala
Naudhrani
4 8 5 106 0 1
(Malerkotla) Vill:Naudhrani, Teh:Malerkotla
Punjab Alkalis & Chemicals Ltd 5 8 6 92 0 1
Naya Nangal
M/s NFL Guest House,Naya Nangal 4 7 5 104 0 1
Ceylon Industries, Factory Area, Patiala 4 7 5 130 0 1
Patiala
Fire Brigade Station, Bahera Road, Patiala 4 8 5 134 0 1
Peer Mohammad
Vill:Peer Mohammad, Teh:Jalalabad 4 6 5 26 0 1
(Jalalabad)
Poohli (Bhatinda) Vill: Poohli, Teh:Bhatinda 4 7 5 21 0 1
Qila Bharian Gurdwara Gangsar Sahib, Vill:Qila Bharian,
4 8 5 112 0 1
(Sangrur) Teh:Sangrur
Shree Ganesh Group of Institute,
Rakhra (Patiala) 5 7 5 53 0 1
Vill:Rakhra, The:Patiala
Gopimal Kaur Sain Industries Pvt. Ltd,
Rohila (Samrala) 5 19 10 120 0 3
Vil:Rohila, Teh:Samrala
Tirathpur United ITI, Vill: Tirathpur, Teh:Amritsar I
5 8 7 58 0 1
(Amritsar I) (earlier Sriguru Harkishan Public
106
Annexure 3: Location wise SO2 - 2019
Standard
Monitored
(24-hourly
(24-hourly
Maximum
Exceeding
Minimum
State / UT City Location
average)
average)
Average
NAAQS
Annual
deviation
School,Rasulpur Kalan)
Rajasthan State Pollution Control Board 6 13 9 98 0 2
Alwar Gaurav Solvex Ltd. MIA 8 18 13 103 0 2
RIICO Pump House, MIA 8 17 12 105 0 2
Khadi Gramoday Samiti 7 12 8 98 0 1
Bharatpur RIICO office Building 6 10 7 100 0 0
RO, Building 7 8 7 102 0 0
R.O.Building 8 63 28 101 0 7
Bhiwadi UIT Guest House 7 33 24 38 0 7
Uttam Strips Ltd 6 40 25 97 0 8
Regional Office building, RSPCB, Near FCI
5 20 8 102 0 2
Godown, Chnaderiya
Chittorgarh
Veterinary Hospital, Meeranagar 5 16 7 97 0 2
PHED Pump House, Segawa 4 14 6 97 0 1
Ajmeri Gate 5 15 7 107 0 1
RJPB Office,Jhalana Doongari 4 12 6 104 0 1
District Education Officer, Chandpole 6 23 7 101 0 2
RIICO Office, M.I.A. 5 14 6 104 0 1
Jaipur RSPCB, Vidyadhar Nagar 5 27 7 104 0 2
VKIA 5 31 10 104 0 4
22,Godam, RIICO Office 5 10 6 107 0 1
Rajasthan
Mansarovar Nagar Niigam 5 10 6 99 0 1
RIICO Office Sitapura Industrial Area 4 16 7 103 0 2
DIC Office, Industrial Estate 3 23 7 86 0 3
Sojati Gate 4 12 7 80 0 2
Basni Industrial Area, RIICO Office 3 13 7 87 0 2
Maha Mandir Police Thane 4 10 7 84 0 2
Jodhpur Office of Housing Board, Chopasani Road 3 11 7 82 0 2
Shastri Nagar Police Thana 3 12 7 87 0 2
Kudi Mahila Thana 5 8 6 50 0 1
Sangariya Police Choki 5 9 6 47 0 1
SoorsagarThana 5 9 6 47 0 1
Regional Office, RJPB, Anantpura 5 11 7 99 0 1
Municipal Corporation Building 5 11 7 104 0 1
Samcore Glass Ltd. 5 13 7 109 0 1
Kota
FireStation Nagar Nigam Shrinathpuram 5 11 7 104 0 2
RajasthanTechnical University,Rawatbhata 5 12 7 103 0 2
Sewage Treatment Plant, Balita, Kota 5 9 6 107 0 1
Ambamata 3 13 6 103 0 2
Udaipur Town Hall 4 23 13 105 0 5
Regional Office,MIA 5 26 14 104 0 5
Chungthang Chungthang 3 10 5 90 0 1
Gangtok White Hall Complex, Tasi view point 4 10 6 77 0 1
Mangan Mangan Police Station 3 7 5 101 0 1
Namchi Namchi 4 7 6 99 0 1
Sikkim
Pelling The Pelling Girls Hostel 2 11 5 94 0 2
Rangpo Rangpo Fire Station 3 16 8 94 0 3
Ravangla Ravangla Range Office 2 28 5 99 0 3
Singtam Police Station Building 4 8 6 93 0 1
Govt. High School, Manali 12 18 15 58 0 2
Kathivakkam 11 17 14 63 0 1
Thiruvottiyur 11 16 14 62 0 1
Madras Medical College 2 22 3 86 0 3
NEERI, CSIR CampusTaramani 2 6 2 86 0 1
Chennai Thiruvottiyur Municipal Office 2 50 5 87 0 6
Adiyar 5 13 8 57 0 1
Tamilnadu Kilpauk 8 13 10 66 0 1
Thiyagaraya Nagar 8 16 11 68 0 1
Nunbakgum 8 14 11 63 0 1
Anna Nagar 8 14 10 53 0 1
Poniarajapuram, On the top of DEL 4 72 6 86 0 7
Coimbatore G.D.Matric Hr.Sec.School 4 9 6 69 0 1
SIDCO Office, Coimbatore/ Kurichi 5 9 7 77 0 1
Cuddalore Eachangadu Village 11 15 13 94 0 1
107
Annexure 3: Location wise SO2 - 2019
Standard
Monitored
(24-hourly
(24-hourly
Maximum
Exceeding
Minimum
State / UT City Location
average)
average)
Average
NAAQS
Annual
deviation
108
Annexure 3: Location wise SO2 - 2019
Standard
Monitored
(24-hourly
(24-hourly
Maximum
Exceeding
Minimum
State / UT City Location
average)
average)
Average
NAAQS
Annual
deviation
109
Annexure 3: Location wise SO2 - 2019
Standard
Monitored
(24-hourly
(24-hourly
Maximum
Exceeding
Minimum
State / UT City Location
average)
average)
Average
NAAQS
Annual
deviation
110
Annexure 3: Location wise SO2 - 2019
Standard
Monitored
(24-hourly
(24-hourly
Maximum
Exceeding
Minimum
State / UT City Location
average)
average)
Average
NAAQS
Annual
deviation
Note:
Cities under Ecologically Sensitive Area (5 cities namely Alwar, Agra, Firozabad, Mathura, Dehradun) as notified by Central
Government. The rest of the cities are under Industrial / Residential / Rural / others category of the National Ambient Air Quality
Standard, 2009. Annual NAAQS of SO2 is 50 µg/m3 for Residential/ industrial / other area and 20 µg/m3 for ecologically sensitive
area.
111
Annexure 4: Location wise NO2 - 2019
Levels of Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2) in locations / Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Stations under
NAMP during 2019
Monitored
(24-hourly
(24-hourly
Maximum
City / town /
Exceeding
Minimum
average)
average)
Average
NAAQS
Annual
State / UT Location
village
112
Annexure 4: Location wise NO2 - 2019
Monitored
(24-hourly
(24-hourly
City / town /
Maximum
Exceeding
Minimum
average)
average)
Average
NAAQS
Annual
State / UT Location
village
113
Annexure 4: Location wise NO2 - 2019
Monitored
(24-hourly
(24-hourly
City / town /
Maximum
Exceeding
Minimum
average)
average)
Average
NAAQS
Annual
State / UT Location
village
114
Annexure 4: Location wise NO2 - 2019
Monitored
(24-hourly
(24-hourly
City / town /
Maximum
Exceeding
Minimum
average)
average)
Average
NAAQS
Annual
State / UT Location
village
115
Annexure 4: Location wise NO2 - 2019
Monitored
(24-hourly
(24-hourly
City / town /
Maximum
Exceeding
Minimum
average)
average)
Average
NAAQS
Annual
State / UT Location
village
116
Annexure 4: Location wise NO2 - 2019
Monitored
(24-hourly
(24-hourly
City / town /
Maximum
Exceeding
Minimum
average)
average)
Average
NAAQS
Annual
State / UT Location
village
117
Annexure 4: Location wise NO2 - 2019
Monitored
(24-hourly
(24-hourly
City / town /
Maximum
Exceeding
Minimum
average)
average)
Average
NAAQS
Annual
State / UT Location
village
B. J. Market 28 36 32 94 0 2
Jalgaon Girna water tank 27 38 32 213 0 2
MIDC Jalgaon 27 38 33 154 0 2
Bachat Bhawan, Near S P Office 33 51 39 104 0 4
Jalna
Krishidhan Seeds Ltd, MIDC Area 33 52 40 172 0 4
University Campus, Shivaji University 10 33 20 80 0 5
Kolhapur Ruikar Trust, S.T. Stand 10 82 38 147 1 18
Mahadwar Road, Near Mahalaxmi Temple 10 82 37 203 1 16
MIDC Water Works 18 27 21 239 0 2
Latur Kshewraj Vidyalaya Shyam nagar 18 27 21 104 0 2
Sidhheshwar Sahakari Bank Ganjgolai 18 27 20 172 0 2
Bank of India, Kalbadevi /Branch,
5 73 27 84 0 15
Kalbadevi/ VARSOVA
Mumbai
Parel TT, Ambedkar Road 7 73 30 88 0 14
Worli 6 71 26 87 0 15
Institution of Engineers 29 57 39 100 0 6
Govt. Polytechnic College, Sadar 29 60 41 96 0 6
MIDC Office Hingana Road 23 56 42 100 0 7
Nagpur MIDC Industrial Area, MIDC Office, Hingna 5 63 22 82 0 11
Nagpur Coop Building, Maskasath, Itwari 6 41 18 79 0 7
NEERI Lab, Nehru Marg, Highway No. 7 8 83 21 74 1 10
MPCB Office Premises, Civil Lines 22 56 38 321 0 6
R.T.O. Colony Tank 8 42 22 154 0 8
VIP Industrial Area, MIDC Satpura 8 42 22 104 0 7
Nashik
Nashik Municipal Council Building 8 42 22 218 0 7
MPCB Sub R.O. Udyog Bhawan, Nashik 6 72 21 305 0 8
T.B.I.A, Rabale Airoli, TTC 17 75 48 103 0 11
Dr. D.Y. Patil College, Nerul, TTC 22 67 45 229 0 7
MPCB Lab, Mhape, TTC 35 73 47 168 0 8
Navi Mumbai
CIDCO Nodal Office Kharghar 35 68 48 103 0 9
Water Pump House, Panvel, Taloja 35 75 48 168 0 8
MIDC Collom Facility Building, Taloja 28 75 47 229 0 4
Pimpri-
23 78 199 77 37
Chinchwad Bank of Baroda Builing, Near M.C Builiding 176
Maratha Chamber of commerce, Bhosari 21 178 72 62 21 29
Pune State Electricity Board BLDG Nalstop 25 254 87 113 59 38
Swargate Police Chawki 48 178 101 33 27 26
Udyog bhavan / SRO, MPCB Sangli 10 87 34 99 1 16
Sangli Sangli- Miraj Primary school Building 10 102 42 226 22 22
Krishna Valley School 10 102 39 163 11 20
WIT Campus 31 39 35 102 0 2
Solapur
Voronoko School / Chitale Clinic 31 39 35 144 0 2
Maternity Hospital, Dhobighat, Thane East 33 40 37 24 0 2
Thane Shahu Market,Naupada, Thane West 33 45 37 49 0 3
Kolshet and Balkum, Thane West 32 45 36 73 0 3
Smt. C. H. M. College Campus 18 83 48 99 1 14
Ulhasnagar
Octroi Naka, Pawai-Chowk, Vithalwadi 24 110 63 107 15 17
Manipur Imphal Secretariat Building 5 52 21 57 0 11
Byrnihat EPIP, Ri-Bhoi district 5 18 13 121 0 3
Dawki Terrace building, Jaintia Hills District 5 18 13 121 0 3
Khliehriat O/o BDO, C & R.D. Block-Khliehriat 5 15 11 122 0 3
Nongstoin Office Premises of E.E, PHED 5 21 13 121 0 3
Boards Office Permises, Lumpyngngad 5 13 7 106 0 2
Meghalaya State Tuberculosis Hospital 5 26 20 121 0 6
Shillong
Forest Rest House, Polo Hills 5 16 11 117 0 3
41/2 mile, Mylliem Range Office 5 16 9 119 0 3
Tura PHED, Araimille, West Garo Hills District 5 16 12 116 0 3
Umiam /
5 15 12 120 0 2
Umsning Umiam Industrial Complex, Ri-Bhoi District
Khatla, M.G-Road, Mizoram SPCB 5 15 11 103 0 3
Laipuitlang 5 5 5 106 0 0
Mizoram Aizawl Bawngkawn 5 17 9 102 0 2
Dawrpui Y.M.A, Building, Dawrpui 5 21 11 102 0 3
Lengpui Airport, Model Veng, Lengpui 5 5 5 94 0 0
118
Annexure 4: Location wise NO2 - 2019
Monitored
(24-hourly
(24-hourly
City / town /
Maximum
Exceeding
Minimum
average)
average)
Average
NAAQS
Annual
State / UT Location
village
119
Annexure 4: Location wise NO2 - 2019
Monitored
(24-hourly
(24-hourly
City / town /
Maximum
Exceeding
Minimum
average)
average)
Average
NAAQS
Annual
State / UT Location
village
Aligarh
9 37 17 103 0 5
(Jagraon) Forest Office, Vill:Aligarh, Teh:Jagraon
R.O. Focal Point (earlier Nagina soap
25 38 33 62 0 3
factory)
Amritsar
Vinod Chilling Center / Kochar Bhavan
26 46 35 60 0 3
(earlier A-1,Platers)
Aspal Khurd
9 18 12 124 0 2
(Tapa) Vill:Aspal Khurd, Teh:Tapa
Bara Pind
10 26 20 83 0 4
(Goraya) Vill:Bara Pind, Teh:Goraya
Bhatinda Bathinda Milk Producers, Dabwali Road 5 21 13 84 0 2
Binjon
9 19 14 80 0 2
(Garshankar) CHC, Vill:Binjon, Teh: Garshankar
Bishanpura Longowalia Yarns (Unit-II), Vill-Bishanpura,
9 39 21 93 0 6
(Payal) Teh: Payal
Changal
6 26 13 106 0 3
(Sangrur) Mastuana Sahib, Vill:Changal, Teh:Sangrur
Chowkimann Ludhiana College of Engineering,
9 32 19 102 0 4
(Jagraon) Vill:Chowkimann, Teh:Jagraon
Dera Baba
11 17 13 67 0 1
Nanak C-PYTE Building
Punjab Chem and Crop Protection,
9 26 13 107 0 3
Dera Bassi Bhanakarpur Rd
Winsome Yarns Ltd., Barwala Road 9 18 12 114 0 2
Fatehpur Baba Banda Singh Bahadur College,
10 13 11 38 0 1
(Samana) Vill:Fatehpur, Teh:Samana
Modi Oil and General Mills, Mandi 13 44 36 126 0 6
Gobindgarh Raj Steel Rolling Mills, Mandi 13 40 35 133 0 4
United Rolling Mills, Mandi Gobindgarh 15 98 36 130 1 8
Guru Ki Dhab Vil:Guru Ki Dhab / Basti Himmatpura,
7 26 13 22 0 5
(Kotkapura) Teh:Kotkapura
Jaito Sarja Royal Nursing College, Vill: Jaito Sarja, Teh:
11 18 14 37 0 1
Punjab (Batala) Batala
Municipal Council Tubewell No. 27 18 49 25 81 0 5
Regional Office 18 47 24 73 0 5
Jalandhar
Punjab Maltex , Kapurthala Road 12 40 22 59 0 5
Focal Point 20 34 25 62 0 4
Markfed Vanaspati, Khanna 7 73 26 112 0 10
Khanna
AS School, Khanna 11 45 27 116 0 7
Kharaori
10 29 13 126 0 5
(Sirhind) Vill:Kharaori, Teh:Sirhind
Kotladoom Satyam College, Ramtirath Road, Vill:
11 18 13 62 0 1
(Ajnala) Kotladoom, Teh: Ajnala
Lakho ke
Behram Vill:Lakho ke Behram, Teh:Ferozpur 5 12 11 0
(Ferozpur)
Bharat Nagar Chowk / RO Gill Road 13 39 23 120 0 6
Nahar Spining Mlls, Dholewal Chawk 11 46 25 126 0 7
Ludhiana
Ludhiana Coop. Milk Producer, Ferozpur Rd 5 48 24 137 0 7
PPCB Office Building, Vishavkarma Chowk 20 86 32 131 1 8
Mrar Kalan
Vill: Mrar Kalan, Teh:Muktsar 10 26 14 42 0 5
(Muktsar)
Mukandpur Govt. Senior Sec. School, Vill:Mukandpur,
13 26 17 78 0 3
(Nawashahar) Teh:Nawashahar
Mureedke
8 18 12 98 0 2
(Batala) Johal Farm, Vill: Mureedke, Teh: Batala
Naudhrani
9 25 13 104 0 3
(Malerkotla) Vill:Naudhrani, Teh:Malerkotla
Punjab Alkalis & Chemicals Ltd 9 22 12 95 0 2
Naya Nangal
M/s NFL Guest House,Naya Nangal 9 23 12 108 0 2
Ceylon Industries, Factory Area, Patiala 9 30 12 128 0 2
Patiala
Fire Brigade Station, Bahera Road, Patiala 10 23 12 132 0 3
Peer
Mohammad Vill:Peer Mohammad, Teh:Jalalabad 10 13 12 23 0 1
(Jalalabad)
120
Annexure 4: Location wise NO2 - 2019
Monitored
(24-hourly
(24-hourly
City / town /
Maximum
Exceeding
Minimum
average)
average)
Average
NAAQS
Annual
State / UT Location
village
Poohli
Vill: Poohli, Teh:Bhatinda 10 26 15 23 0 5
(Bhatinda)
Qila Bharian Gurdwara Gangsar Sahib, Vill:Qila Bharian,
10 27 13 112 0 3
(Sangrur) Teh:Sangrur
Shree Ganesh Group of Institute,
Rakhra (Patiala) 11 13 12 53 0 1
Vill:Rakhra, The:Patiala
Rohila Gopimal Kaur Sain Industries Pvt. Ltd,
9 42 20 120 0 7
(Samrala) Vil:Rohila, Teh:Samrala
United ITI, Vill: Tirathpur, Teh:Amritsar I
Tirathpur
(earlier Sriguru Harkishan Public 10 14 13 58 0 1
(Amritsar I)
School,Rasulpur Kalan)
Rajasthan State Pollution Control Board 22 40 30 98 0 5
Alwar Gaurav Solvex Ltd. MIA 28 45 37 103 0 4
RIICO Pump House, MIA 27 45 34 105 0 4
Khadi Gramoday Samiti 23 38 27 97 0 3
Bharatpur RIICO office Building 5 34 25 99 0 3
RO, Building 20 30 24 102 0 1
R.O.Building 15 78 44 101 0 12
Bhiwadi UIT Guest House 31 79 53 38 0 11
Uttam Strips Ltd 12 79 42 97 0 14
Regional Office building, RSPCB, Near FCI
18 91 29 102 1 9
Godown, Chnaderiya
Chittorgarh
Veterinary Hospital, Meeranagar 15 83 27 97 2 12
PHED Pump House, Segawa 14 64 23 97 0 7
Ajmeri Gate 17 50 34 107 0 6
RJPB Office,Jhalana Doongari 13 33 21 104 0 4
District Education Officer, Chandpole 22 72 34 101 0 7
RIICO Office, M.I.A. 15 42 23 104 0 6
Jaipur RSPCB, Vidyadhar Nagar 5 50 27 104 0 6
VKIA 16 55 31 104 0 8
22,Godam, RIICO Office 14 40 24 107 0 5
Rajasthan
Mansarovar Nagar Niigam 15 39 24 99 0 5
RIICO Office Sitapura Industrial Area 16 47 27 103 0 6
DIC Office, Industrial Estate 10 53 25 86 0 9
Sojati Gate 11 56 26 80 0 9
Basni Industrial Area, RIICO Office 10 50 25 87 0 8
Maha Mandir Police Thane 11 58 26 84 0 9
Jodhpur Office of Housing Board, Chopasani Road 10 53 25 82 0 9
Shastri Nagar Police Thana 11 57 26 87 0 9
Kudi Mahila Thana 17 43 25 50 0 7
Sangariya Police Choki 18 44 27 47 0 7
SoorsagarThana 15 52 26 47 0 8
Regional Office, RJPB, Anantpura 19 32 24 99 0 3
Municipal Corporation Building 19 31 24 104 0 3
Samcore Glass Ltd. 19 37 24 109 0 3
Kota
FireStation Nagar Nigam Shrinathpuram 20 31 25 104 0 3
RajasthanTechnical University,Rawatbhata 19 33 25 103 0 4
Sewage Treatment Plant, Balita, Kota 18 45 24 107 0 3
Ambamata 11 44 27 103 0 7
Udaipur Town Hall 15 52 32 105 0 8
Regional Office,MIA 13 53 33 104 0 8
Chungthang Chungthang 5 5 5 90 0 0
Gangtok White Hall Complex, Tasi view point 5 25 10 77 0 6
Mangan Mangan Police Station 5 8 5 101 0 1
Namchi Namchi 5 8 5 99 0 1
Sikkim
Pelling The Pelling Girls Hostel 5 11 5 93 0 1
Rangpo Rangpo Fire Station 5 18 8 94 0 3
Ravangla Ravangla Range Office 5 8 5 98 0 1
Singtam Police Station Building 5 8 6 93 0 1
Govt. High School, Manali 15 21 18 58 0 2
Kathivakkam 14 20 17 62 0 2
Tamilnadu Chennai Thiruvottiyur 14 19 16 62 0 2
Madras Medical College 5 65 21 86 0 12
NEERI, CSIR CampusTaramani 5 43 16 86 0 8
121
Annexure 4: Location wise NO2 - 2019
Monitored
(24-hourly
(24-hourly
City / town /
Maximum
Exceeding
Minimum
average)
average)
Average
NAAQS
Annual
State / UT Location
village
122
Annexure 4: Location wise NO2 - 2019
Monitored
(24-hourly
(24-hourly
City / town /
Maximum
Exceeding
Minimum
average)
average)
Average
NAAQS
Annual
State / UT Location
village
Rambagh 5 58 23 124 0 12
Square crossing circle of Laxmi Talkies 10 51 39 106 0 9
Bharat Yantra Nigam Ltd 7 57 34 108 0 9
Allahabad Alopibagh/Sewage Pumping Stations 29 88 49 76 1 11
Jhonstonganj/co-operative Bank 26 72 42 98 0 8
Rambagh/Parag Dairy 26 69 46 102 0 9
Anpara Colony, Sonabhadra 19 32 29 95 0 3
Anpara
Renusagar Colony, Sonabhadra 21 32 28 97 0 2
Sarvodaya Hospital, Tatiri Merrut, Baghpat
10 54 21 93 0 8
Road
Baghpat
Weavetex Overseas Hostel, Khekra,
10 57 21 94 0 8
Baghpat
IVRI Izatnaga 18 38 27 107 0 5
Bareily
Indian oetrol pump, Civil Line 25 65 36 107 0 6
Center for Development of Glass Industry 17 42 31 104 0 5
Firozabad Tilak Nagar 20 41 31 104 0 5
Raza ka Tal 22 41 31 103 0 4
Raunaq Auto Ltd, J.P. Nagar 16 55 35 94 0 9
Gajraula
Indira Chowk, J.P. Nagar 14 67 40 92 0 10
Atlas Cycles Industries, Sahibabad Ind. area 23 65 46 93 0 10
Bulandshaar Road Industrial Area 21 61 43 87 0 9
Ghaziabad
Khora Colony, Ghaziabad 10 85 26 86 1 13
Vinoba Bhave Park, Lohia Nagar, Ghaziabad 10 82 27 85 1 13
M. M.M. Engineering College, Gorakhpur 10 42 19 93 0 9
Gorakpur India Glycol Ltd. Gida, Gorakhpur 28 80 48 101 1 11
Jalkal, Muncipal Corporation, Golghar 20 75 37 92 0 14
Holland Tractor, Greater Noida 10 87 26 88 1 14
Greater Noida
Honda Power, Greater Noida 9 86 26 88 1 14
Srinagar Colony, Railway Road, Hapur 13 41 23 89 0 6
Hapur
Jindal Pipes Ltd, Hapur 13 42 27 70 0 6
Manik Chawk / Jal chauraha 11 33 19 117 0 3
Jhansi
Veeranga Nagar 9 30 17 116 0 2
Forest & Training Centre, Kidwai Nagar 34 63 48 93 0 7
Chamber Of Commerce Darshanpurwa /
35 69 53 94 0 7
Deputy ka Parao
Associated Chem Pvt Ltd, Fazalganj, Panki,
37 66 54 83 0 7
Site-5
Head Post Office, Govind Nagar / Dabauli /
Kanpur 33 59 52 83 0 6
Shastri NGR
Jajmau / Awas Vikas 41 63 50 93 0 5
I.I.T. Campus, Kanpur 9 24 14 100 0 2
IIT 12 parameter 7 66 14 164 0 6
Dada Nagar, Kanpur 15 55 41 91 0 7
Ramadevi, Kanpur 21 75 36 89 0 7
Central Glass & Ceramic Research Institute 18 24 20 95 0 1
Khurja
Ahirpara 18 21 19 92 0 1
Mahanagar 21 43 30 225 0 5
Chandganj Garden, Aliganj 21 43 31 270 0 5
Kapoor Hotel, Hazratganj 21 43 31 187 0 5
Talkatora 20 43 30 268 0 5
Lucknow
Aminabad / S.M.K Chowk 20 43 31 279 0 5
Nagar Nigam 20 43 30 268 0 5
Ansal Technical Institute Campus, Ansal API 20 43 30 266 0 5
Vikas Khand 16 70 37 68 0 14
RO. UPPCB, 65 Baldevpuri, Maholi Road 17 32 26 81 0 3
Mathura
CETP, Industrial Area, Mathura 19 40 29 83 0 4
Begum Bridge 70 85 78 59 25 5
Meerut
Thana Railway Road / Kesarganj 40 56 48 59 0 5
Hindu College, Station Road 11 83 51 91 2 16
Moradabad
Central Police Hospital, Civil Lines 13 59 32 90 0 12
Sahara Parivar Office, Kamal Cinema,
14 46 33 97 0 7
Muzaffarnagar Building, Railway Station Road
Lekhpal Bhawan, Tehsil Sadar Campus 21 51 35 97 0 8
Noida UP PPCB, E-12/1, Sector - 1 16 147 61 97 20 26
123
Annexure 4: Location wise NO2 - 2019
Monitored
(24-hourly
(24-hourly
City / town /
Maximum
Exceeding
Minimum
average)
average)
Average
NAAQS
Annual
State / UT Location
village
124
Annexure 4: Location wise NO2 - 2019
Monitored
(24-hourly
(24-hourly
City / town /
Maximum
Exceeding
Minimum
average)
average)
Average
NAAQS
Annual
State / UT Location
village
Note: Cities under Ecologically Sensitive Area (5 cities namely Alwar, Agra, Firozabad, Mathura, Dehradun) as notified by Central
Government. The rest of the cities are under Industrial / Residential / Rural / others category of the National Ambient Air Quality
Standard, 2009
Annual NAAQS of NO2 is 40 µg/m3 for Residential/ industrial / other area and 30 µg/m3 for ecologically sensitive area.
125
Annexure 5: Location wise PM10 - 2019
Monitored
(24-hourly
(24-hourly
Maximum
Exceeding
Minimum
State City Location
average)
average)
Average
NAAQS
Annual
Standard
deviation
126
Annexure 5: Location wise PM10 - 2019
Monitored
(24-hourly
(24-hourly
Maximum
Exceeding
Minimum
State City Location
average)
average)
Average
NAAQS
Annual
Standard
deviation
127
Annexure 5: Location wise PM10 - 2019
Monitored
(24-hourly
(24-hourly
Maximum
Exceeding
Minimum
State City Location
average)
average)
Average
NAAQS
Annual
Standard
deviation
128
Annexure 5: Location wise PM10 - 2019
Monitored
(24-hourly
(24-hourly
Maximum
Exceeding
Minimum
State City Location
average)
average)
Average
NAAQS
Annual
Standard
deviation
129
Annexure 5: Location wise PM10 - 2019
Monitored
(24-hourly
(24-hourly
Maximum
Exceeding
Minimum
State City Location
average)
average)
Average
NAAQS
Annual
Standard
deviation
130
Annexure 5: Location wise PM10 - 2019
Monitored
(24-hourly
(24-hourly
Maximum
Exceeding
Minimum
State City Location
average)
average)
Average
NAAQS
Annual
Standard
deviation
131
Annexure 5: Location wise PM10 - 2019
Monitored
(24-hourly
(24-hourly
Maximum
Exceeding
Minimum
State City Location
average)
average)
Average
NAAQS
Annual
Standard
deviation
132
Annexure 5: Location wise PM10 - 2019
Monitored
(24-hourly
(24-hourly
Maximum
Exceeding
Minimum
State City Location
average)
average)
Average
NAAQS
Annual
Standard
deviation
133
Annexure 5: Location wise PM10 - 2019
Monitored
(24-hourly
(24-hourly
Maximum
Exceeding
Minimum
State City Location
average)
average)
Average
NAAQS
Annual
Standard
deviation
134
Annexure 5: Location wise PM10 - 2019
Monitored
(24-hourly
(24-hourly
Maximum
Exceeding
Minimum
State City Location
average)
average)
Average
NAAQS
Annual
Standard
deviation
135
Annexure 5: Location wise PM10 - 2019
Monitored
(24-hourly
(24-hourly
Maximum
Exceeding
Minimum
State City Location
average)
average)
Average
NAAQS
Annual
Standard
deviation
136
Annexure 5: Location wise PM10 - 2019
Monitored
(24-hourly
(24-hourly
Maximum
Exceeding
Minimum
State City Location
average)
average)
Average
NAAQS
Annual
Standard
deviation
137
Annexure 5: Location wise PM10 - 2019
Monitored
(24-hourly
(24-hourly
Maximum
Exceeding
Minimum
State City Location
average)
average)
Average
NAAQS
Annual
Standard
deviation
138
Annexure 5: Location wise PM10 - 2019
Monitored
(24-hourly
(24-hourly
Maximum
Exceeding
Minimum
State City Location
average)
average)
Average
NAAQS
Annual
Standard
deviation
139
Annexure 5: Location wise PM10 - 2019
Monitored
(24-hourly
(24-hourly
Maximum
Exceeding
Minimum
State City Location
average)
average)
Average
NAAQS
Annual
Standard
deviation
140
Annexure 5: Location wise PM10 - 2019
Monitored
(24-hourly
(24-hourly
Maximum
Exceeding
Minimum
State City Location
average)
average)
Average
NAAQS
Annual
Standard
deviation
Note:
‘-‘ data not available. Cities under Ecologically Sensitive Area (5 cities namely Alwar, Agra, Firozabad, Mathura, Dehradun) as
notified by Central Government. The rest of the cities are under Industrial / Residential / Rural / others category of the National
Ambient Air Quality Standard, 2009
Annual NAAQS of PM10 is 60 µg/m3 for Residential/ industrial / other area and for ecologically sensitive area.
141
Annexure 6: Location wise PM2.5 - 2019
Monitored
(24-hourly
(24-hourly
Maximum
Exceeding
City Location deviation
Minimum
average)
average)
Average
NAAQS
Annual
Kamala Nagar 12 65 41 35 1 14
APIIC Zonl office industrial estate 10 53 24 65 0 10
Cancer Unit. G.G.Hsharada Nagar, JNTU Road 13 32 20 34 0 4
Anantapur D.No.6/5/545, Ram Nagar Colony 18 55 34 72 0 9
GNC Toll Gate Tirumala 7 66 24 80 1 13
Near Nutrine Confectionery, Palamaner Road 10 49 28 87 0 7
Chitoor
O/O Mines and Geology, Old Collector Office,
12 41 27 71 0 7
Greamspet
Ashram Diagnostic Centre 15 33 22 45 0 5
Eluru District Head quarters hospital 12 30 16 39 0 4
Near Hindu College, Market Road 21 48 29 63 0 5
A.P. Pollution Control Board, D.No.4-5-
13 31 18 75 0 3
4/5C,4/3, Navabharath nagar, Ring Road
Distirct Industries Center office Buiding
18 38 25 63 0 4
Autonagar
Guntur Government General hospital 11 33 19 49 0 3
Near ICL Industries, Yerragunta, YSR 10 48 30 81 0 8
DIC Office,Kadapa 10 42 23 54 0 7
Kadapa Rajiv Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences 8 69 24 70 1 11
Office Building Ramanayyapeta 6 107 30 55 6 23
Gram Panchayathi building, Suryaraopeta 6 30 15 28 0 6
MEE Seva / MEPMA Office, Sailipeta 6 59 16 41 0 11
Petro Chemical Engineering Block, JNTU ,
6 53 18 41 0 10
Kakinada Pithapuram Road
Mourya Inn, Krishna Nagar 9 55 25 57 0 11
APIIC Building Industrial estate, Kallur at IDA
13 58 34 42 0 11
Bobbili Growth Center
Rajvihar Circle 17 56 34 68 0 10
Andhra Pradesh
142
Annexure 6: Location wise PM2.5 - 2019
Monitored
(24-hourly
(24-hourly
Maximum
Exceeding
Minimum
City Location deviation
average)
average)
Average
NAAQS
Annual
Head Office, Bamunimaidam 12 51 27 24 0 10
Assam
Sector-17 C 10 149 59 90 35 32
Chandigarh Punjab Engineering College, Sector- 12 17 180 63 115 51 37
Sector-39, IMTECH 13 199 64 126 53 37
Kaimbwala Village 7 165 56 127 44 33
Bilaspur Regional Office, CECB Vyapar Vihar 13 38 27 91 0 4
Visak Hostel, Sector-4 28 50 39 69 0 6
R.O., 5/32 Banglow Office Building 20 40 29 72 0 5
M.P. Laghu Udyog Nigam 33 61 52 75 1 5
Chattisgarh
Wash) 21 130 44 87 15 27
L.D. Engg. College 16 103 35 88 17 23
Shardaben Hospital, Saraspur 16 113 35 86 12 24
R.C. Technical High School, Mirzapur 16 93 33 86 12 21
AZL Behrampura, Ahmadabad 16 108 36 87 16 24
Ahmedabad Sola L.T. Chanakyapuri Pumping Station 18 112 37 88 13 27
Anklesvar Rallis India Ltd. 21 70 37 88 7 12
143
Annexure 6: Location wise PM2.5 - 2019
Monitored
(24-hourly
(24-hourly
Maximum
Exceeding
Minimum
City Location deviation
average)
average)
Average
NAAQS
Annual
Durga Traders, Bhavanafarm Society 21 67 35 88 4 11
Jamnagar Fisheries Office 14 85 34 87 12 18
Nr. Sardhara Industrial Corporation 16 83 35 87 10 16
Rajkot GPCB Regional Offce 14 98 35 87 11 19
S.V.R. Engg. College 16 57 33 87 0 9
B.R.C. High School, Udhna 18 109 46 83 15 23
Surat Near Air India Office 13 104 41 88 13 20
GPCB Office, Geri Vasahat 17 86 34 87 12 17
Sterling Gelatin Guest House, Vill-Karakhadi
Padia 17 108 40 87 16 25
Dandia Bazaar 17 89 34 88 10 17
CETP Nandesari 18 112 41 85 0 26
Vadodara Lubrizol 17 94 36 87 11 19
GEB, IIIrd Phase, GIDC 17 98 45 86 18 22
Vapi Vapi Nagar Palika, Vapi 12 89 35 87 10 18
Regional Office 6 43 19 99 0 7
Damtal Old Road 7 52 22 97 0 10
Kotwali Bazar Dharamshala 8 25 14 29 0 4
Dharamshala Daari, Dharamshala 7 82 17 118 1 8
Himachal Pradesh
Kochi Kuttipadam 4 61 32 43 2 17
Kerala
Kozhikode City 2 38 13 85 0 8
Kozhikode Nallalam 1 56 14 87 0 11
144
Annexure 6: Location wise PM2.5 - 2019
Monitored
(24-hourly
(24-hourly
Maximum
Exceeding
Minimum
City Location deviation
average)
average)
Average
NAAQS
Annual
Hamidia Road, MP Hastshilp Vikas Nigam 35 119 13 10 30
CETP Govindpura 25 56 7 0 12
Kolar Thana, Kolar Road, Bhopal 39 122 14 10 29
AKVN Office, Industrial Area Mandideep,
37 125 12 10 29
Raisen
Barkatuallah University, Hoshgabad Road,
25 86 16 9 23
Bhopal
Bhopal Arera Colony 12 80 48 40 12 18
Chhindwara HIG -33, Front of Geetanali Park Housing
12 60 34 96 0 12
Board Colony, Chadagaon
Hindustan Unileaver, Narsinghpur Road, 12 60 37 88 0 11
EID Perry (I) Limited 25 59 47 24 16 11
Dewas Metal Section 30 58 45 26 18 8
Dewas Vikas Nagar 25 86 46 41 27 12
Madhya Pradesh
4 174 40 94 17 29
Mumbai Worli
37 71 6 0 13
145
Annexure 6: Location wise PM2.5 - 2019
Monitored
(24-hourly
(24-hourly
Maximum
Exceeding
Minimum
City Location deviation
average)
average)
Average
NAAQS
Annual
Water works, Palasuni, Rasalgarh 7 76 30 70 1 12
Patrapara, Khandagiri 14 56 30 46 0 13
Chandrashekharpur 12 83 28 61 1 12
Govt. Hospital Bonai At/Po/PS-Bonai Dist-
Bonaigarh Sudargarh 24 89 51 104 0 14
Traffic Tower, Badambadi 18 97 40 54 1 13
P.H.D Office Barabati 25 113 50 54 14 24
Cuttack R.O. Cuttack Office, Surya Vihar 24 106 50 94 23 22
R.O. Building Cox colony 35 93 51 108 21 10
TRL Colony, M/s. TRL Krosaki Refractories Ltd.
Jharsuguda PO: Bhepahar, 29 71 39 106 1 7
Paradeep On roof of PPT Staff Quarter 23 169 55 76 14 39
Puri Town Police Station 12 91 38 1 13
Rajgangpur DISIR, Rajgangpur 31 93 58 103 39 15
Regional Office Orissa SPCB 10 91 32 104 2 14
Rayagada LPS High School, Jaykaypur 9 66 35 101 2 14
Regional Office, ORPB 20 88 37 104 2 7
Kalunga Industrial Estate 17 79 47 104 29 16
IDL Police Out-post, Sonaparbat 40 93 51 104 10 8
Rourkela Kuarmunda, Sundergarh 22 93 53 104 38 14
Sambalpur Filter Plant, PHD Office, Modipara 19 164 48 105 17 20
Coal Field Area 19 93 49 104 34 20
Talcher T.T.P.S.Colony 12 125 44 104 24 23
Govt. High School, Manali 26 52 36 30 0 6
Kathivakkam 20 45 33 28 0 6
Thiruvottiyur 25 48 35 30 0 5
NEERI, CSIR CampusTaramani 10 76 29 85 1 11
Kilpauk 17 57 38 34 0 11
Thiyagaraya Nagar 15 59 42 27 0 12
Chennai Anna Nagar 25 52 39 23 0 8
Poniarajapuram, On the top of DEL 9 50 28 29 0 11
G.D.Matric Hr.Sec.School 10 122 42 20 2 23
Coimbatore SIDCO Office, Coimbatore/ Kurichi 12 79 42 32 3 16
Eachangadu Village 27 35 32 40 0 2
SIPCOT (Project Office) 24 33 29 38 0 2
Tamilnadu
Hyderabad Paradise 4 80 41 83 9 16
Charminar 9 70 33 92 2 15
Zoo Park 7 148 55 102 40 33
Jeedimetla Industrial Estate, Rangareddy
Distt. 13 78 42 67 10 18
Khammam CER Club Khamam 34 56 45 24 0 7
Nalgonda AP PCB Nalgonda 28 47 16 0 6
Nizamabad subashnagar,nizamabad dist 33 46 41 45 0 3
146
Annexure 6: Location wise PM2.5 - 2019
Monitored
(24-hourly
(24-hourly
Maximum
Exceeding
Minimum
City Location deviation
average)
average)
Average
NAAQS
Annual
Patencheru Police Station, Medak, Ramachadrapuram 21 56 41 58 0 8
Pashamylaram/Municipal Office 4 131 45 107 28 30
Sangareddy Regional office Building of SANGAREDDY 21 53 40 53 0 7
M/s. Mylan Industries, Gaddapothara 30 58 46 47 0 7
Warangal Mee-Seva Building ,Municipal Complex 32 36 2 0 3
SPCB, Pavivesh Bhawan, Pandit Nehru
Tripura
Note:
Cities under Ecologically Sensitive Area (5 cities namely Alwar, Agra, Firozabad, Mathura, Dehradun) as notified by Central
Government. The rest of the cities are under Industrial / Residential / Rural / others category of the National Ambient Air Quality
Standard, 2009
Annual NAAQS of PM2.5 is 40 µg/m3 for Residential/ industrial / other area and for ecologically sensitive area.
147
Annexure 7: List of Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Stations under NAMP
Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Stations under National Ambient Air Quality Monitoring
Programme (NAMP) – manual stations
148
Annexure 7: List of Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Stations under NAMP
149
Annexure 7: List of Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Stations under NAMP
150
Annexure 7: List of Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Stations under NAMP
151
Annexure 7: List of Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Stations under NAMP
152
Annexure 7: List of Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Stations under NAMP
153
Annexure 7: List of Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Stations under NAMP
154
Annexure 8: List of Non- Attainment Cities
Non-Attainment cities (122 cities) with respect to Ambient Air Quality India (2014-2018)
155
Annexure 8: List of Non- Attainment Cities
156