2021 Annual Statistical Report

March 2022
We are pleased to present the Kent County Correctional Facility’s Annual Statistical
Report for the year 2021. Assembling these yearly reports of jail data began in 1998, and each
new report adds to the long-term analytical value of the information collected. Our goal is to
provide accurate, useful, interesting, and representative information to the Sheriff’s Department
staff, criminal justice planners, academics and community members who are interested in the
operation of the county jail.
Beginning in March of 2020, the Covid-19 pandemic brought significant changes to our
operations, and this continued throughout 2021. The inmate population was again much lower
than normal, but slowly began to rise as the year progressed. Our Community Re-entry Center
remained closed for most of the year, and our population was again weighted toward more
serious offenders. This was exacerbated by the necessity to hold sentenced State DOC offenders
for much longer periods of time due to the prison system enacting moratoriums on accepting new
admissions. The stresses of incarceration, aggravated by stringent Covid quarantine guidelines
and safety practices (which were far more prolific in 2021 than in 2020), no doubt contributed to
the spike in violent behavior by inmates this year, seen most clearly in the number of fights and
assaults. This may also be reflective of the rising violent crime rates nationally.
This report is organized to make the information accessible to the readers. You will
notice that it has three general types of statistics. Inmate profile statistics depict an overall
profile of the inmate population and correctional facility staff. Inmate population and arrest
statistics address the topics of how many inmates are coming in, where they are coming from,
why they are here, how long are they staying, care that is provided, and some of the costs
associated with them. Incident statistics allow us to evaluate the behavior of the inmate
population while they are in jail.
For convenience, this report, along with previous years, may also be accessed at
https://www.accesskent.com/Sheriff/reports.htm. Due to the never-ending task of error detection
and correction, when comparing previous editions this update should be considered the most
accurate. I realize that this document will not answer every question. If you have further
questions, please contact us and we will try to provide any additional information you may need
about the inmate population or facility operation. We value your comments and suggestions for
future reports.
Finally, a both humorous and humbling reminder: “Definition of Statistics: The science
of producing unreliable facts from reliable figures.” – Evan Esar
Sergeant Aaron Kleinheksel

INDEX
Average Daily Populations and Facility Totals

Booking and Population Statistics ........................................................................................................................ 11
Average Daily Population of the Main Jail by Month .......................................................................................... 12
Monthly Bookings Averaged Over a Decade ....................................................................................................... 13
Number of Inmates Brought to Jail per Year ........................................................................................................ 14
Number of Bookings and MJ Average / Peak Population .................................................................................... 15
Annual Average Daily Population for All Inmates in KCCF Custody Over the Years ........................................ 16
History of Jail Capacity in Kent County (1835 to 1984) ...................................................................................... 17
History of Jail Capacity in Kent County (2013 to Present) .................................................................................. 20
Average Length of Stay

Inmate Profile at Time of Booking (part 3) ............................................................................................................ 3
Average Amount of Time Inmates Stay in Jail, Shown with Inmates Grouped by Release Type ........................ 32
Average Length of Stay Depicted as Jail Bed Days ............................................................................................. 33
Arrest Information
Number of Inmates Brought to Jail by Arresting Agency .................................................................................... 25
Number of Inmates Brought to Jail in the Last 10 Years by the Top Five Arresting Agencies ............................ 26
Marijuana-related Arrests by Year ....................................................................................................................... 27
Types of Criminal Charges Over Time................................................................................................................. 28
Top Arrests by Inmate Home Zip Code................................................................................................................ 29
Kent County Arrest Map by Inmate Home Zip Code ........................................................................................... 30
Billing, Collections, Fees

Agency Billing Information .................................................................................................................................. 37
Processing Fees for the Last Ten Years ................................................................................................................ 38
Room and Board Collection Efforts ..................................................................................................................... 39
County Jail Reimbursement Program ................................................................................................................... 40
Booking or Admissions – Yearly or Monthly Totals and Averages

Booking and Population Statistics ........................................................................................................................ 11
Monthly Bookings Averaged Over a Decade ....................................................................................................... 13
Number of Inmates Brought to Jail per Year ........................................................................................................ 14
Number of Bookings by Year ............................................................................................................................... 14
Gang Admissions.................................................................................................................................................. 45
Classification
Annual Classification Numbers for 2021 ............................................................................................................. 31
Inmate Needs Reported in Classification Interview ............................................................................................. 64
Inmate Needs Reported in Prior Years ................................................................................................................. 65
Employee Profiles
Correctional Facility Employee Profile ................................................................................................................ 10
Generational Distribution of Correctional Staff ................................................................................................... 20
Medical and Mental Health Related Information

Health Services Report ......................................................................................................................................... 57
Out of Facility Medical Statistics ......................................................................................................................... 58
Responses to Medical Survey Completed in Intake by Nurses............................................................................. 59
“Yes” Responses to Medical Survey Compared with Prior Years ....................................................................... 60
Answers to Mental Health Screening Completed in Intake .................................................................................. 61
“Yes” Answers to Mental Health Screening in Recent Years .............................................................................. 62
Work Completed by Mental Health Staff ............................................................................................................. 63
Inmate Needs Reported in Classification Interview ............................................................................................. 64
Inmate Needs Reported in Prior Years ................................................................................................................. 65
History of Jail Capacity
History of Jail Capacity in Kent County (2013 to Present) .................................................................................. 20
Incidents and Rule Violations

Total Counts of Incidents and Inmate Rule Violations ................................................................................... 41-42
Number of Serious Rule Violations Indexed to Population .................................................................................. 43
Total Number of Category 1, 2 and 3 Rule Violations in the Last Eleven Years ................................................. 44
Index of Antisocial Inmate Behavior .................................................................................................................... 46
Index of Destructive Inmate Behavior .................................................................................................................. 47
Index of Noncompliant Inmate Behavior ............................................................................................................. 48
Index of Security Related Inmate Behavior .......................................................................................................... 49
Index of Violent Inmate Behavior ........................................................................................................................ 50
Comparison – Index of Inmate Behavior .............................................................................................................. 51
Suicide Attempts or Gestures Compared with the Total Number of Suicide Precautions .................................... 52
Number of Fights by Housing Unit ...................................................................................................................... 53
Number of Fights by Year .................................................................................................................................... 53
Inmate Profiles and General Demographic Information

Inmate Profile at Time of Booking ..................................................................................................................... 1-3
Profile of Male Inmates at Time of Booking ...................................................................................................... 4-5
Profile of Female Inmates at Time of Booking .................................................................................................. 8-9
Interesting Facts about KCCF Inmates ................................................................................................................... 9
Male Inmate Marriage Rate Longitudinal Survey .................................................................................................. 6
Average Length of Stay Depicted as Jail Bed Days ............................................................................................. 33
Number of Serious Rule Violations Indexed to Population .................................................................................. 43
Gang Admissions .................................................................................................................................................. 45
PREA
Staff Misconduct ................................................................................................................................................... 66
Inmate Misconduct ............................................................................................................................................... 66
Closing Review .................................................................................................................................................... 67
Recidivism
Inmate Profile at Time of Booking (part 2) ............................................................................................................ 2
Profile of Male Inmates at Time of Booking (part 2) ............................................................................................. 5
Profile of Female Inmates at Time of Booking (part 2) .......................................................................................... 8
Interesting Facts about KCCF Inmates ................................................................................................................... 9
Total Number of Times an Inmate has been in KCCF ......................................................................................... 21
Recidivism Rate of KCCF Inmates from 2014-2019............................................................................................ 22
Recidivism Rate of KCCF Inmates from 2019-2021............................................................................................ 23
Recidivism Information Including Likelihood of Recidivating ............................................................................ 24
Release Related Information

Average Amount of Time Inmates Stay in Jail, Grouped by Release Type ......................................................... 32
Most Common Reasons Why Inmates are Released ............................................................................................ 34
Number of Days Inmates Stay in Jail before Being Released .............................................................................. 35
Number of Hours Inmates Spend in Jail before Being Released on Bond ........................................................... 36
Suicide Attempt and Precaution Related Information

Total Counts of Incidents and Inmate Rule Violations ......................................................................................... 41
Suicide Attempts or Gestures Compared with Total Number of Suicide Precautions .......................................... 52
Support Provided to Law Enforcement

Jail Information Program Statistics....................................................................................................................... 54
Sally Port Assistance Provided to Arresting Agencies ......................................................................................... 55
K-9 Statistics ........................................................................................................................................................ 56
Inmate Profile at Time of Booking (part 1)
Age at booking
teens 5.4% 2021
20's 33.6%
50%
30's 31.2%
40's 16.6% 25%
50's 9.6%
0%
60's 3.1% teens 20's 30's 40's 50's 60's 70's +
70's + 0.5%
Marital status 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
single 74.4% 74.6% 74.2% 74.5% 75.7% 75.4% 76.5% 77.6%
married 14.9% 14.2% 14.9% 13.9% 13.5% 13.5% 13.4% 12.5%
divorced 10.7% 11.2% 10.9% 10.8% 10.8% 11.2% 10.1% 9.8%
2021 2014 through 2021
D
10%
M
13%
S
77%
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Race 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

white 46.8% 48.0% 47.2% 46.6% 47.2% 47.8% 45.3% 45.5%
black 43.2% 42.3% 42.6% 43.0% 43.0% 42.7% 44.4% 44.1%
hispanic 10.0% 9.7% 9.4% 9.7% 8.9% 8.6% 9.4% 9.3%
2021 2014 through 2021
H
9%
W
45%
B
44%
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
# of children 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

none 37.2% 35.0% 36.1% 36.6% 34.8% 34.0% 37.4% 36.4%
one 18.3% 18.6% 18.4% 18.5% 18.3% 18.7% 17.8% 18.3%
two 17.7% 18.3% 18.1% 17.2% 17.7% 17.7% 17.2% 17.1%
three + 26.8% 28.1% 27.4% 27.7% 29.2% 29.6% 27.6% 28.2%
2021 2014 through 2021
3+
none
28%
37%
2
17% 1
18%
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
TrendSpotter! We have provided this kind of inmate profile information for many years and the
tables point out some interesting differences and similarities. Those in their 20's and 30's account for 65% of
all admissions. Once they reach their 40's there is a significant drop.
Inmate Profile - Booking (pt 1) 1

Shift booked on 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Days (7AM-7PM) 49.3% 50.4% 48.9% 49.6% 46.4% 44.5%
Nights (7PM-7AM) 50.7% 49.6% 51.1% 50.4% 53.6% 55.5%
Bookings by Hour
1000
800
600
400
200
0
# of charges 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

one 63.2% 65.3% 61.3% 59.9% 59.1% 60.3% 56.2% 53.4%
two 20.7% 19.5% 21.2% 21.7% 22.3% 21.4% 22.6% 23.2%
three + 16.1% 15.2% 17.5% 18.4% 18.7% 18.2% 21.2% 23.4%
2021 2014 through 2021
23%
54%
23%
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Occupation 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

yes 50.5% 51.4% 51.7% 52.4% 53.9% 54.0% 46.8% 48.9%
no 49.5% 48.6% 48.3% 47.6% 46.1% 46.0% 53.2% 51.1%
2021 2014 through 2021
54.0%
53.2%
49.0% 51.1%
49.5%
48.6% 48.3%
46% 49% 47.6%
44.0% 46.1% 46.0%
39.0%
34.0%
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Recidivism 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

1st time 22.3% 21.6% 18.7% 18.4% 18.4% 19.1% 19.7% 18.7%
returning 77.7% 78.4% 81.3% 81.6% 81.6% 80.9% 80.3% 81.3%
2021 2014 through 2021
1
19%
Ret
80%
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Gender 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
male 74.9% 74.0% 74.5% 74.8% 74.3% 73.9% 75.7% 75.3%
female 25.1% 26.0% 25.5% 25.2% 25.7% 26.1% 24.3% 24.7%
Ave. Stay in Days 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
male 11.4 12.2 12.6 12.0 11.9 11.7 10.9 12.2
female 6.8 8.3 8.4 8.3 8.0 8.4 7.8 8.5
together 10.3 11.2 11.6 11.0 10.9 10.9 10.2 11.2
Age 2018 2019 2020 2021 Age 2018 2019 2020 2021
15 1 0 1 7 15
16 6 9 8 11 16
17 333 315 182 176 17
18 569 384 261 249 18
19 641 502 310 252 19
20 660 576 379 380 20
21 728 626 411 411 21
22 735 626 367 445 22
23 740 650 360 451 23
24 813 660 377 418 24
25 805 694 405 445 25
26 847 715 403 441 26
27 902 687 398 440 27
28 853 815 434 396 28
29 777 763 433 457 29
30 732 716 427 456 30
31 730 653 424 462 31
32 700 655 384 455 32
33 671 637 374 380 33
34 594 588 352 383 34
35 639 611 300 390 35
36 592 548 316 357 36
37 623 531 338 372 37
38 498 529 275 372 38
39 497 546 288 350 39
40 424 461 269 334 40
41 390 409 242 330 41
42 332 376 234 272 42
43 329 313 197 253 43
44 296 298 170 188 44
45 281 281 175 165 45
46 288 270 143 160 46
47 272 222 128 155 47
48 297 271 121 140 48
49 261 258 160 127 49
50 252 242 178 157 50
51 251 241 126 142 51
52 293 224 117 131 52
53 270 252 108 134 53
54 233 232 128 110 54
55 206 215 139 125 55
56 189 191 125 119 56
57 192 150 93 125 57
58 170 146 83 100 58
59 144 135 78 88 59
60 128 132 51 85 60

Profile of Male Inmates at Time of Booking (part 1)
Age at booking
2021
teens 5.5%
50%
20's 32.9%
30's 30.9%
25%
40's 16.5%
50's 10.3%
0%
60's 3.4% teens 20's 30's 40's 50's 60's 70's +
70's + 0.5%
Marital status 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
single 74.4% 75.2% 75.8% 75.8% 76.9% 76.0% 77.3% 78.3%
married 15.4% 14.1% 13.9% 13.9% 13.3% 13.4% 13.2% 12.6%
divorced 10.2% 10.7% 10.3% 10.3% 9.8% 10.5% 9.5% 9.1%
2021 2014 through 2021
9%
13%
78%
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Race 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

white 45.0% 45.6% 44.9% 44.6% 45.0% 45.3% 42.5% 42.3%
black 44.0% 43.9% 44.0% 44.4% 44.5% 44.6% 46.7% 46.5%
hispanic 11.0% 10.5% 10.3% 10.2% 9.5% 9.2% 9.9% 10.1%
2021 2014 through 2021
10%
42%
47%
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
# of children 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

none 35.6% 36.2% 39.5% 39.5% 37.6% 36.5% 39.3% 38.6%
one 19.8% 19.6% 18.3% 18.7% 18.6% 18.9% 17.8% 18.4%
two 18.2% 17.5% 16.9% 16.2% 17.1% 17.0% 16.6% 16.5%
three + 26.4% 26.7% 25.1% 25.7% 26.7% 27.6% 26.3% 26.5%
2021 2014 through 2021
27%
39%
16%
18%
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
TrendSpotter! This page contains information about male offenders from this year and previous years. The
tables point out some interesting similarities between this year and prior years.
Male Profile - Booking (pt 1) 4

Profile of Male Inmates at Time of Booking (part 2)
Shift booked on 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Days (7AM-7PM) 49.4% 50.3% 48.7% 50.2% 46.8% 44.9%
Nights (7PM-7AM) 50.6% 49.7% 51.3% 49.8% 53.2% 55.1%
Bookings by Hour
600
300
# of charges 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

one 61.3% 63.5% 55.0% 57.5% 57.2% 58.6% 53.7% 51.1%
two 21.2% 19.8% 27.0% 22.2% 22.5% 21.7% 23.1% 23.5%
three + 17.5% 16.7% 18.0% 20.3% 20.2% 19.7% 23.2% 25.4%
2021 2014 through 2021
25%
51%
24%
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Occupation 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

yes 51.5% 42.5% 53.5% 53.7% 55.5% 55.6% 47.8% 50.9%
no 48.5% 57.5% 46.5% 46.3% 44.5% 44.4% 52.2% 49.1%
2021 2014 through 2021
49% 51%
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Recidivism 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

1st time 21.1% 20.1% 21.2% 20.4% 16.7% 17.1% 17.9% 17.2%
returning 78.9% 79.9% 78.8% 79.6% 83.3% 82.9% 82.1% 82.8%
2021 2014 through 2021
17%
83%
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Male Profile - Booking (pt 2) 5

Marriage Rates of Male Inmates Decrease Over 20 Years
Single Married Divorced
2002 69.3% 18.9% 11.8%
2003 70.7% 17.9% 11.4%
2004 69.3% 17.9% 12.8%
2005 71.1% 17.9% 11.0%
2006 71.5% 17.3% 11.2%
2007 73.2% 16.3% 10.6%
2008 73.2% 16.4% 10.4%
2009 73.8% 15.6% 10.6%
2010 73.0% 16.6% 10.3%
2011 74.2% 15.0% 10.8%
2012 74.5% 15.1% 10.4%
2013 74.8% 14.7% 10.5%
2014 74.4% 15.4% 10.2%
2015 75.2% 14.1% 10.7%
2016 75.8% 13.9% 10.3%
2017 75.8% 13.9% 10.3%
2018 76.9% 13.3% 9.8%
2019 76.0% 13.4% 10.5%
2020 77.3% 13.2% 9.5%
2021 78.3% 12.6% 9.1%
Male Inmate Marital Status 20 Year Trend

90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Single Married Divorced
TrendSpotter! While collecting inmate profile data each year has its own utility, this chart
demonstrates how some things can only be detected over much longer periods of time. As can be
seen, the marriage rate of males coming into the jail was relatively stable until about 2005, and then
began a steady overall decline over the next 15+ years. This mirrors societal trends (especially among
those demographic groups most represented in jail) as well as informing us that unmarried males are
much more likely to be arrested.
Marriage Analysis 6
Profile of Female Inmates at Time of Booking (part 1)
Age at booking
2021
teens 5.4%
50%
20's 35.6%
30's 31.8%
25%
40's 17.1%
50's 7.6%
0%
60's 2.2% teens 20's 30's 40's 50's 60's 70's +
70's + 0.3%
Marital status 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
single 73.0% 71.3% 72.9% 73.6% 72.3% 73.5% 73.9% 75.8%
married 14.1% 15.5% 14.5% 13.9% 13.9% 13.5% 13.9% 12.3%
divorced 12.9% 13.2% 12.6% 12.4% 13.7% 13.0% 12.2% 11.9%
2021 2014 through 2021
12%
12%
76%
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Race 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

white 52.0% 54.5% 53.9% 52.4% 53.4% 54.6% 54.0% 55.1%
black 40.9% 38.0% 38.5% 38.7% 38.6% 37.4% 37.2% 37.0%
hispanic 7.1% 7.5% 6.7% 8.1% 6.9% 7.1% 7.9% 6.7%
2021 2014 through 2021
7%
37% 56%
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
# of children 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

none 29.1% 23.7% 25.9% 28.2% 26.6% 26.8% 31.2% 29.6%
one 17.9% 17.9% 18.8% 18.1% 17.6% 18.2% 17.7% 18.2%
two 19.8% 22.5% 21.6% 19.9% 19.4% 19.4% 19.1% 18.9%
three + 33.2% 35.9% 33.7% 33.8% 36.4% 35.5% 32.0% 33.4%
2021 2014 through 2021
30%
33%
18%
19%
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
TrendSpotter! This page contains information about female offenders from this year and previous years,
providing interesting comparisons, particularly when set against the corresponding numbers for males.
Female Profile - Booking (pt 1) 7

Profile of Female Inmates at Time of Booking (part 2)
Shift booked on 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Days (7AM-7PM) 48.9% 50.6% 49.4% 48.1% 45.1% 43.4%
Nights (7PM-7AM) 51.1% 49.4% 50.6% 52.0% 54.9% 56.6%
Bookings by Hour
250
200
150
100
50
0
# of charges 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

one 68.7% 69.1% 67.7% 66.8% 64.2% 65.3% 63.9% 60.0%
two 19.3% 19.4% 19.8% 20.3% 21.6% 20.7% 21.2% 22.2%
three + 12.0% 11.5% 12.4% 12.9% 14.2% 14.0% 14.9% 17.8%
2021 2014 through 2021
18%
60%
22%
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Occupation 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

yes 46.8% 47.2% 46.3% 48.6% 49.6% 49.5% 43.8% 42.9%
no 53.2% 52.8% 53.7% 51.4% 50.4% 50.5% 56.2% 57.1%
2021 2014 through 2021
43%
57%
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Recidivism 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

1st time 26.1% 26.2% 26.1% 26.4% 23.5% 24.7% 25.2% 23.4%
returning 73.9% 73.8% 73.9% 73.6% 76.5% 75.3% 74.8% 76.6%
2021 2014 through 2021
23%
77%
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Female Profile - Booking (pt 2) 8

Interesting Facts About KCCF Inmates
Offender characteristics male female together
s Average age 34.9 33.7 34.6
s Average number of kids 1.7 1.9 1.8
s Average grade completed 11.9 12.2 12.0
s Percentage who are born in the USA 92.4% 96.3% 93.4%
s Besides USA, 2nd most common country of birth Mexico (162)
s Besides USA, 3rd next most common country of birth Guatamala (86)
s Most frequently claimed occupation unemployed (4,546)
s 2nd most frequently claimed occupation general (3,247)
s 3rd most frequently claimed occupation none (1,932)
s 4th most frequently claimed occupation other (757)
s 5th most frequently claimed occupation factory (515)
s 6th most frequently claimed occupation food service (495)
s 7th most frequently claimed occupation construction (416)
s Least claimed occupation bail, religious - tied (1)
s Most frequently claimed religion none (7,429)
s 2nd most frequently claimed religion protestant (3,894)
s 3rd most frequently claimed religion catholic (1,116)
s 4th most frequently claimed religion muslim (219)
s 5th most frequently claimed religion jewish (45)
s Most frequently claimed service army (211)
s 2nd most frequently claimed service navy (94)
s 3rd most frequently claimed service marines (89)
s 4th most frequently claimed service air force (29)
s 5th most frequently claimed service national guard (28)
s Besides MI, 2nd most common state of birth Illinois (443)
s Besides MI, 3rd most common state of birth California (189)
s Besides MI, 4th most common state of birth Mississippi (160)
s Oldest person booked in 83
s Most charges in a single booking 25
1 or more 10 or more Most times
Number of repeat offenders each year times this times this by single
year year person
Number of individual offenders who were admitted to jail in
s 16,620 19 13
2015 (out of 23.587 total admissions)
s 16,203 20 22
2016 (out of 23,259 total admissions)
s 2017 (out of 22,225 total admissions) 15,688 11 27
s 15,479 8 18
s 14,421 9 16
s 9,149 2 14
s 9,585 3 14
Random Facts 9
Correctional Facility Employee Profile
Category Total % of total

Number of persons employed in the jail system as of January 1, 2021 284
Number of male employees 215 75.70%
Number of female employees 69 24.30%
Average age of employees 40.67 years
Average age of male employees 40.35 years
Average age of female employees 41.66 years
Average years of seniority 10.80 years
Average years of seniority of male employees 10.72 years
Average years of seniority of female employees 11.05 years
Racial breakdown - White 229 80.63%
Racial breakdown - Black/African American 20 7.04%
Racial breakdown - Asian 1 0.35%
Racial breakdown - American Indian / Alaskan Native 3 1.06%
Racial breakdown - Hispanic/Latino 18 6.34%
Racial breakdown - 2 or more races 13 4.58%
Type of Employee - Supervisory 29 10.21%
Type of Employee - Deputies 213 75.00%
Type of Employee - Administrative Support Personnel 23 8.10%
Type of Employee - Other Personnel 19 6.69%
Number of deputies who resigned in 2021 3
Number of deputies who retired in 2021 4
Number of deputies who were terminated in 2021 2
Turnover rate of deputies in 2021 4.23%
Profile of Correctional Officers hired this year
Number of deputies hired in 2021 22
Number of deputies hired in 2021 with Military experience 2 9.1%
Number of deputies hired in 2021 with some college 5 22.7%
Number of deputies hired in 2021 with a 2 year degree 7 31.8%
Number of deputies hired in 2021 with a 4 year degree or more 10 45.5%
Gender of newly hired deputies - male 18 81.8%
Gender of newly hired deputies - female 4 18.2%
Race of newly hired deputies - White 18 81.8%
Race of newly hired deputies - Black/African American 3 13.6%
Race of newly hired deputies - Asian 0 0.0%
Race of newly hired deputies - Native American 0 0.0%
Race of newly hired deputies - Hispanic/Latino 1 4.5%
Race of newly hired deputies - 2 or more races 0 0.0%
Correctional Officers hired between July 1998 and this year
Number hired in this time period (last 23 years) 283
Number with a 4 year degree 172 60.8%
Number with a 2 year degree 71 25.1%
Number with Military experience 34 12.0%
Number with past Corrections/Law Enforcement experience 66 23.3%
Number who were employed in other KCCF positions when they applied 20 7%
Talking Point! The information contained in the table above was correct as of January 1, 2021. It
should be noted that our deputy turnover rate is low when compared with other jails our size around the
country. Turnover rates in jails of 10% to 15% are not uncommon, and rates of 25% and higher are
sometimes reported.
Employee Profile 10
Booking and Population Statistics
Monthly Averages Vary Widely
bookings per day bookings per month total bookings for 2020 average daily population
Average 38 1,135 919
Minimum 16 901 798
Maximum 71 1,292 1,043
Range 55 391 245
13,631
Number of Bookings per Month
1228 1292 1241

1159 1069 1154 1199 1197
1054 1068 1057
901
Jan-21 Feb-21 Mar-21 Apr-21 May-21 Jun-21 Jul-21 Aug-21 Sep-21 Oct-21 Nov-21 Dec-21
Daily Average of Bookings by Month

40 42
40 40
38 37 38 38 38
35
35
31
Average Daily Population by Month
1043 1023
1023
957 972
949
891
854 843 849
825
798
Booking Statistics 11
The Average Daily Population of the Main Jail
MAIN JAIL AVERAGE DAILY POPULATION BY

MONTH 2020 & 2021
TrendSpotter! The average monthly population of the jail was often over 1100 in 2018 and 2019, and this chart
shows the drastic decrease from those numbers beginning in March of 2020 resulting from the Covid-19 pandemic. 2021
witnessed those numbers begin their slow climb back. Starting in November of 2021 however, this was arrested by a
resurgence of Covid-19. We would expect these numbers to resume their return to pre-Covid levels in 2022.
AMP 12
Monthly Bookings Averaged Over 10 Years
2300
A Decade of Bookings
2200
2100
2000
1900
1800
1700
1600
1500
1400
TrendSpotter! This chart presents the 10 year average of new book-ins organized
by month. The purpose of this is to further identify our yearly activity levels for
administrative planning purposes. Using this data we can see that March and August are
historically our busiest months, while February and November see the lowest number of
bookings.
Monthly Ave. Bookings 13

The Number of Inmates Brought to Jail per Year
Significant drop in admissions due to Covid-19
35,000
30,000
25,000
20,000
15,000
Annual Bookings from 1991 through 2021
10,000
5,000
1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
33,072 31,737 Annual Bookings from 2001 through 2021

31,354
(with trend line)
29,135
31,088 31,164
30,238 29,635
28,844 26,211
24,545
26,180 26,400
24,860 24,775 24,693
23,455
22,478
20,826
13,631
12,019
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
20.0% 35,000
13.4%
10.0% 6.4% 30,000

2.8%
3.5%
0.6% 1.0% 0.8%
0.0% 25,000
-0.7% -0.3%
-0.6%
-4.0%-1.8% -2.7% -0.3%
-4.2%
-5.2% -4.4%
-10.0% 20,000
-5.5% -7.3%
-10.1%
-20.0% 15,000
-30.0% 10,000
-40.0% Percentage of Change from Previous Year's 5,000

Bookings 2001 through 2021
-42.3%
-50.0% 0
2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017 2019 2021
TrendSpotter! The above chart shows the number of bookings each year (orange line) with the % of
increase or decrease from the previous year (blue bar). We experienced a 42.3% decrease in 2020. The 3 charts
on this page starkly illustrate the effect of Covid-19 on our population for 2020.
Annual Bookings Trend 14

Number of Bookings and MJ Average / Peak Populations
year 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
NBI 29,135 26,180 26,325 26,211 24,860 24,828 24,693 24,545 23,455 22,642 20,804 12,436 13,835
35,000
Admissions (NBI's) to the Jail

30,000
25,000
20,000
15,000
10,000
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
year 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
ADP 1,073 912 963 1,032 992 922 1,047 1,071 1,114 1,121 1,084 798 919
Peak 1,164 1,004 1,079 1,173 1,103 1,004 1,139 1,162 1,216 1,205 1,199 1,128 1,065
+ or - 8.5% 10.1% 12.0% 13.7% 11.2% 8.9% 8.8% 8.5% 9.2% 7.5% 10.6% 41.4% 15.9%
1,250
1,200
1,150
1,100
1,050
1,000
950
900
850
800 Average and Peak Populations in Main Jail

750
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
TalkingPoint! The bottom chart shows the difference in the Main Jail between the AVERAGE daily
population and the PEAK daily population. In 2021 we had more inmates than average 49% of the time. The
difference between the normal or "average" population and the peaking population is called the "peaking factor."
The peaking factor for 2021 was 15.9%.
Average and Peak Counts 15

Annual Average Daily Population for all Inmates in KCCF
Custody
1,300
1,300
1,286
1,253
1,242 1,242
1,222 1,223
1,200
1,161
1,157
1,119 1,121
1,100 1,115 1,114
1,093 1,093
1,084
1,058
1,071
1,046
1,000
TrendSpotter! The average daily number of inmates in the 919

900 Sheriff's custody fell precipitously in 2020 resulting from Covid-19, down
over 26% from 2019, then bounced back 15% in 2021 as we began to
return to regular operations.
798
800
700
The figures on this graph represent the daily average of the total number of inmates in our custody, including
the Main Jail, Community Reentry Center, and Honor Camp (closed in 2010). It does not include Kent County
inmates lodged at other agencies.
20 Year Annual ADP Trends 16

History of Jail Capacity in Kent County (1835 to 1984)
Capacity Levels
Year Description of the Event or Solution
MJ HC WR System
First Kent County Jail consisted of two cells in the corner of the
1835
Courthouse
First jail burns and for the next 10 years inmates are housed in
rented quarters, primarily in a cellar of a building on Canal Street,
1845
with more important inmates being sent to jails in adjourning
counties.
A new Sheriff's residence was built with a wooden structure called
1855 "Kent County Jail House" in the rear. It consisted of heavy planking
with sheet iron sheathing on the inside.
Rising crime and frequency of escapes from the current jail cause
1872 the county to construct a new jail in the "Bastille" style. When it 114
opened in March, it was called the "Prisoner's Paradise."
Chairman of the Finance Committee of the Board of

1913 Commissioners called the jail a "cheese box" that had "first prize for
being the most hazardous building in Michigan today."
1950 Peak Average Daily Population reaches 162 inmates.
After several failed attempts over 4 decades, voters finally approve
1954
a ballot measure for a new jail.
1958 Original Ball Avenue Jail constructed with a capacity of 240 beds. 240 240
Honor Camp opens with a capacity of 48, bringing us to a total
1968 240 48 288
capacity of 288.
Jail expansion by 116 beds, bringing us to a capacity in the Main
1974 356 48 404
Jail of 356. Total capacity for all jail facilities was 404.
Jail expansion by 95 beds, bringing us to a capacity in the Main Jail
1977 451 48 499
of 451. Total capacity for all jail facilities was 499.
61st District Court creates Community Service Program for
1977
sentenced misdemeanor cases.
1979 Lawsuit filed by six inmates in U.S. District Court.
1980 Formation of "Alternatives to Incarceration" task force.
We begin the practice of boarding out inmates to other counties
1980
due to overcrowding. This continued for 15 years.
Creation of Court Services Department to administer Pre-trial
1981 Release and Community Service programs. Post arraignment Pre-
trial Screening begins at the jail.
Work Release facility created at the Salvation Army building with a
1982 451 48 48 547
capacity of 48 beds.
Court Services Community Service program begins placing felony
1982 and misdemeanor cases to work in the community from all district
courts and Circuit Court.
Federal Court order by Judge Enslen in the matter of Johnson v.
1982 Heffron limiting occupancy at the Main Jail to 95 percent of
capacity.
Jail expansion by 122 beds, bringing the Main Jail to 573. Total
1983 573 48 48 669
capacity for all jail facilities was 669.
Expansion of Pre-trial Release and Community Service programs.
1984
Pre-trial program now includes full-time supervision services.
Expansion of Work Release facility by 24 beds for a capacity of 72.
1984 573 48 72 693
Total capacity for all jail facilities is 693.
Jail Management System approved for automating records at the
1984
Kent County Jail.
Jail History (pt 1) 17

Capacity Levels
MJ HC WR System
Agreement to house up to 25 females at Project Rehab Community
1985
Treatment Center.
Expansion of Work Release facility by 18 beds to a total capacity of
1985 573 48 90 711
90. Total capacity for all jail facilities is 711.
Jail Population Management Board formed to study causes of jail
1987
crowding.
Electronic Monitoring and Work Crew programs started with
1987
Federal Grant
1988 Additional judge added for 17th Circuit Court
Formation of the Community Corrections Advisory Board pursuant
1989
to P.A. 511 of 1988.
Approval of Comprehensive Criminal Justice System Study by
1989
David M. Bennett.
Temporary minimum security jail building adding 64 beds to the
1989 Main Jail, bringing its capacity to 637. Total capacity for all jail 637 48 90 775
facilities is 775.
Expansion at the Work Release adds 14 beds for a total of 104
1989 637 48 104 789
beds. Total capacity for all jail facilities is 789.
This was the high year for the practice of boarding inmates in other
1990
counties. Daily average this year was 146.
Tax increase of 0.84 mills approved by voters on August 7th to
1990
construct a new jail addition.
1990 Contract approved for jail architectural services.
1990 Creation of Criminal Justice Coordinator position.
Pre-trial and Community Service program expanded to provide staff
1991 for additional numbers of supervised release cases and community
service placements.
New jail addition opened in December but parts of the old jail are
1992 closed for renovation. We become the central intake facility for the
Grand Rapids Police Department.
Pre-trial services expanded to include pre-arraignment screening
1992 and investigation and Fast Track processing 24 hours a day, 7 days
a week coverage at the jail.
New jail addition and renovation of the old jail completed, adding
1993 363 additional beds (after closing the temporary facility), bringing us 1,000 48 104 1,152
to a capacity in the Main Jail of 1,000, and a total capacity of 1,152.
Jail Bed Allocation Agreement begun, committee implemented, and
1993
weekly jail bed reports sent to all criminal court judges.
Temporary minimum security building relocated to Honor Camp.
1993
Capacity at Honor Camp remains at 48.
The practice of boarding inmates in other counties because of
1994
overcrowding finally ends this year after 15 years.
Order from the Federal Sixth Circuit Court granting relief from
1996
Judge Enslen's count reduction measures.
Pre-trial Electronic Monitoring program re-started after being
1997
discontinued in 1989.
Federal grant program enables Kent County communities to add
1997
large numbers of new police.
Research conducted into the issues surrounding adding double
1998 bunks to the Main Jail. 24 bunks added this year, beginning the 1,024 48 104 1,176
capacity of the Main Jail to 1,024.

Capacity Levels
MJ HC WR System
Jail Population Monitoring Clerk begins monitoring split-sentence
1998
cases to facilitate early release into community facilities.
29 additional double bunks added for a total of 53, with a capacity
1999 1,053 48 104 1,205
of 1,053 in the Main Jail, and a total capacity of 1,205.
Relocation of the Work Release facility from the Salvation Army to
1999 the old Kent Oaks facility, increasing the capacity to 136. Total 1,053 48 136 1,237
system capacity is now 1,237.
9 additional double bunks added for a total of 62, bringing us to a
2000 1,062 48 136 1,246
capacity of 1,062 in the Main Jail, and a total capacity of 1,246.
32 additional double bunks added for a total of 94, with a capacity
2002 1,094 48 136 1,278
of 1,094 in the Main Jail, and a total capacity of 1,278.
2003 Two additional judges added for 17th Circuit Court.
Six additional bunks added to the Honor Camp, increasing its
2003 1,094 54 136 1,284
capacity to 54.
Ten additional bunks added to Work Release, increasing its
2004 1,094 54 146 1,294
capacity to 146.
2004 Corrections and Detention Millage Committee formed
2005 Two more bunks to the Honor Camp, capacity up to 56 1,094 56 146 1,296
Corrections and Detention Millage Committee submits final report
2005
to County Administration in December.
Expansion project begins at Work Release and extra programs
2005
added. Building renamed the Community Reentry Center.
2006 Expansion at the Work Release completed. 1,094 56 248 1,398
2006 Four more bunks added to Honor Camp, capacity up to 60 1,094 60 248 1,402
90 additional double bunks added bringing us to a capacity of 1,184
2006 1,184 60 248 1,492
in the Main Jail, and a total capacity of 1,492.
Renovation started on the new Mental Health Unit. 53 bunks taken
2006 1,131 60 248 1,439
out of service.
Criminal Justice Planners Harrison / Landmark present a report to
2007 County Administration in December that evaluates the jail's facilities
and recommends demolition and expansion.
Mental Health Unit opened with 39 additional bunks, leaving us with
2007 1,170 60 248 1,478
a Main Jail capacity of 1,170 and a total capacity of 1,478.
Kent, Kalamazoo and Allegan Counties hire a consulting firm to
2007
determine the feasibility of creating a regional jail.
2008 Voters approve an extension of Jail Millage.
County selects Tower Pinkster as the design firm for the expansion
and demolition project, and Owens, Ames and Kimble were
2009
selected as the construction firm. A jail transition team is formed
and design work begins in mid-summer.
Renovation started on Upper Rear and D1B. Additional double
2010 bunks are added to B2 and B3. The Main Jail has a new temporary 1,101 48 248 1,397
capacity.
2010 Using Honor Camp for inmate housing suspended in November. 1,101 0 248 1,349
One wing of the Work Release (CRC) was closed the last week of
2010 1,101 0 186 1,287
December, leaving two wings in operation.
The newly renovated Upper Rear reopens in January as H2 with a
2011 1,293 0 186 1,479
new capacity of 192.
The newly renovated D1B reopens in February with a new capacity
2011 of 46. New A Building video visitation annex is opened, allowing in- 1,331 0 186 1,517
person visitation areas to be closed down.
Lower One Man, Middle One Man, and Upper Annex are
2011 1,221 0 186 1,407
demolished in March.

History of Jail Capacity in Kent County (2012 to present)
Capacity Levels
MJ WR System
The new jail housing units open in December (L1, L2, L3, M1, M2, and
2012 1,285 186 1,471
M3). The old side (Lower, Middle and Upper) is closed.
Work Release (CRC) is closed. 192 Double bunks are installed in B2,
2015 1,477 0 1,477
B3, D1, D2 & D. This increased our Main Jail count to 1,477.
Construction of a new kitchen and a dedicated entrance for the Work
2016 Release (CRC) program to the Main Jail was started. Completion is 1,477 0 1,477
projected to be April, 2017.
The new kitchen and Work Release Entrance additions to the jail are
2017 1,477 0 1,477
completed and open.
In March, the Covid-19 pandemic resulted in a drastic reduction in
population size, going from over 1100 to a low of 624 and including the
suspension of our Work Release (CRC) program. This year also saw
2020 1,477 0 1,477
the first full year of our new Indigent Court bond reform program and the
introduction of electronic tether to the jail, both of which effect
population.
Generational Distribution of Correctional Staff

In recent years our facility has been undergoing a considerable transition in the age of staff. These numbers
represent our generational distribution as of February 2022.
Deputies Admin Total

Baby Boomers: Born 1946-1964 4.5% 0.3% 4.9%
Generation X: Born 1965-1980 28.0% 10.8% 38.8%
Millenials (Gen Y): Born 1981-1996 49.3% 3.1% 52.4%
Gen Z (iGen): Born 1997-2012 3.8% 0.0% 3.8%
Total 85.7% 14.3% 100.0%

Total Number of Times an Inmate has been in KCCF
Core Group of 2,224 Offenders Return to Jail 15 Times or More
The average returning inmate (excluding first timers) has been in KCCF 10.2 times
30%
25%
59% of the returning inmates arrested in 2021 (excluding first
timers) have been in jail 6 or more times.
20%
16%
15%
10% 11%
10% 8%
6%
5%
5% 4%
5% 4% 3%
3% 3% 3% 2% 2%
2% 2% 1% 2% 1%
1% 1% 1% 1% 1%
0%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26+
Percentage of inmates in KCCF their 2nd time, 3rd time, 4th time, etc.
The average inmate (including first timers) has been in KCCF 8 times
30%
25% 24%
44% of all inmates arrested in 2021 (including first timers)

20% have been in jail 6 or more times.
15%
12%
10% 8%
8%
6%
5%
5% 4% 4%
3% 3%
2% 2% 2% 2% 2%
2% 1% 1% 1% 1%
1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%
0%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26+
Percentage of inmates in KCCF their 1st time, 2nd time, 3rd time, etc.
These graphs were produced by looking at the 10,893 unique offenders arrested in 2021 and counting how many times
they had been in the Kent County Correctional Facility since 1986. The point of producing these graphs side-by-side is to
show the difference in the number of times in jail between the repeat offenders (the recidivists are in the top chart) and the
whole population that includes the lightweights (bottom chart).
TalkingPoint! Of all the people brought to jail, 44% are there for their first, second or third visit. Among the
offenders who came to jail in 2021, there was one inmate who had been in KCCF 147 times! Remember, these numbers
only represent the number of times these offenders were in the Kent County Jail and doesn't include any visits they may
have made to other jails.
Recidivism 21
Recidivism Rate of KCCF Inmates
The previous page examines recidivism by looking at the people in jail or being admitted to jail and looking backwards to see how
many of them have been admitted to the Kent County Correctional Facility in previous years. Another approach to examining
recidivism is examined on this page. This forward looking approach surveys a group of admissions at a point in the past and follows
them in subsequent years to see how many individuals were rebooked after their initial release from the Kent County Correctional
Facility. The information on this page examines inmates booked into the Kent County County Correctional Facility during calendar
year 2014 and then measured what proportion of them were rebooked into the Kent County Correctional Facility through the
remainder of 2014 through the end of 2019. We provided the jail data from those years to Andy Verheek at the Kent County Office of
Community Corrections and he analyzed it for recidivism rates. The results of the analysis are reported on this page.
TalkingPoint! There were a total of 59,605 unique individuals booked into KCCF at least one time over the six year period
from 2014 through 2019. Out of these 59,605 individuals, 26,999 were rebooked (for any reason) into KCCF one or more times
during this same time period. This represents an overall recidivism rate of 45.3%, meaning that 45.3% of the individuals in this
sample were booked into KCCF two or more times. Of the 26,999 offenders booked two or more times into KCCF, females were
admitted an average of 3.7 times and males an average of 4.0 times.
"Class of 2014 to 2019" - 59,605 individuals booked & rearrested anytime in 2014 through 2019
Total Individuals booked at least once Number with at least one
Resulting Recidivism Rate
anytime in 2014 through 2019 subsequent rebooking
All 59,605 26,999 45.3%
Male 42,094 20,094 47.7%
Female 17,511 6,905 39.4%
Black 20,745 11,574 55.8%
Hispanic 6,710 2,498 37.2%
White 31,542 12,693 40.2%
TalkingPoint! The table above includes people whose first arrest in the time period came in 2014 but also those whose first
arrest was during the years 2015 through 2019, so some of them did not have much elapsed time to be re-arrested. In the table
below we looked at the recidivism rate for ONLY those individuals that were booked into KCCF from January 1, 2014 through
December 31, 2014 and released to the community after their first arrest in 2014. This means that those released to prison, another
facility, or another agency were filtered out of the analysis. Each of the offenders in the remaining population had a minimum of
5 full years to get in trouble with the law again. There were 15,176 individuals booked into KCCF during 2014 and subsequently
released back into the community. Out of these 15,176 offenders, 9,485 were rebooked into KCCF at least once from their initial
booking in 2014 until December 31, 2019. This includes individuals first booked into KCCF in 2014 with their first subsequent
booking occurring in the same year (2014). This equates to a recidivism rate of 62.5%.
"Class of 2014" - 15,176 individuals booked in 2014 and their rearrests later in 2014 through 2019
Total Individuals booked at least once in Number with at least one
2014 subsequent rebooking
All 15,176 9,485 62.5%
Male 10,855 7,142 65.8%
Female 4,321 2,343 54.2%
Black 6,099 4,549 74.6%
Hispanic 1,487 888 59.7%
White 7,455 3,980 53.4%
First Time
Offenders in 4,342 1,773 40.8%
2014
Less than
High School 4,520 3,106 68.7%
Education
High School
Education or 10,656 6,379 59.9%
More
Recidivism Since 2014 22

Recidivism Rate of KCCF Inmates
The previous page examines recidivism by looking at individuals booked into KCCF from 2014 through 2019 to see how many
may have been rebooked during that same time frame. This page looks at a group of admissions for a more recent time span of
2019 through 2021. We looked at the overall recidivism rate for this three-year time span as well as recidivism when selecting out
offenders who received a proxy score in 2019. Jail data from these years were analyzed by Andy Verheek at the Kent County
Office of Community Corrections.
TalkingPoint! There were a total of 26,679 unique individuals booked into KCCF at least one time over the three year
period from 2019 through 2021. Using a broad definition of recidivism that looks at rebooking into KCCF for any reason,
including probation and parole violations, 9,597 out of the 26,679 individuals were rebooked at least once during this three year
period. This represents an overall recidivism rate of 36.0%. Of these 9,597 individuals booked two or more times into KCCF,
females were admitted an average of 2.9 times and males an average of 3.1 times. It should be noted that the recidivism rate is
dependant on the specific definition of recidivism utilized at the time of analysis. For example, measuring recidivism for those
with an initial booking event in 2019 and released to the community (meaning that those released to prison, another agency, or
other facility were excluded from the analysis), the resulting recidivism rate would increase to 45.6%.
"Class of 2019 to 2021"

Total Individuals booked at least once Number with at least one
anytime in 2019 through 2021 subsequent rebooking
All 26,679 9,597 36.0%
Male 19,217 7,391 38.5%
Female 7,462 2,206 29.6%
Black 10,614 4,492 42.3%
Hispanic 2,702 780 28.9%
White 13,604 4,245 32.5%
TalkingPoint! The previous table above examined those individuals whose first arrest occurred during the time period
of 2019 through 2021 and includes a broad definition of recidivism. However, not all offenders booked into the Kent County
Correctional Facility are predicted to recidivate at the same rate. Using a proxy risk assessment instrument that takes into
consideration each individuals age at first offense, prior bookings into jail, and current age, Kent County Correctional Facility
personnel can obtain an initial prediction of those most likely to be rebooked into the facility in the future. This proxy risk score is
instrumental to the establishment and provision programming in the Kent County Correctional Facility. The following table
examines the recidivism rates for those individuals that were booked into KCCF for the first time in 2019 and Jailview had proxy
information for the individuals most likely to be released back into the community meaning that offenders released to prison,
another facility, or other agency were filtered out. There were 5,259 individuals booked into KCCF in 2019 where there was proxy
score information available and were released back into the community. Out of these 5,259 individuals, 3,897 were rebooked into
KCCF at least once for any reason (including parole and probation violations) following their initial booking in 2019 until
December 31, 2021 for an overall recidivism rate of 74.1%. The table below illustrates that the recidivism rates are indeed
different for those offenders scored at a low, medium, or high risk of recidivism based on the proxy risk assessment instrument.
"Class of 2019" - 5,259 individuals booked in 2019 and their rearrests later in 2019 through 2021
Low Risk of Recidivism Medium Risk of Recidivism High Risk of Recidivism
661 total individuals 2,753 total individuals 1,845 total individuals
Recidivism 60.8% 72.5% 81.3%
Rate
Male 449 total individuals 2,110 total individuals 1,495 total individuals
Rate 61.2% 73.1% 82.7%
Female 212 total individuals 643 total individuals 350 total individuals
Rate 59.1% 70.5% 75.4%
Black 130 total individuals 1,136 total individuals 1,101 total individuals
Rate 60.8% 73.9% 82.7%
Hispanic 57 total individuals 200 total individuals 160 total individuals
Rate 57.9% 71.5% 76.2%
White 468 total individuals 1,397 total individuals 569 total individuals
Rate 61.1% 71.6% 79.8%
Recidivism Since 2019 23

Recidivism Info - Including Likelihood of Recidivating
TalkingPoint! Additional information regarding regarding the recidivism of all individuals booked into
KCCF between 2019 and 2021:
An offender with an initial 2019 booking event experienced 38 separate bookings between 2019 and 2021.
Overall, male offenders were rebooked an average of 1.5 times and female offenders were rebooked an
average of 1.2 times.
Black offenders were booked an average of 1.9 times, hispanic offenders were booked an average of 1.5
times, and white offenders were booked an average of 1.6 times.
Average (median) length of time between an offender’s first and second bookings was 147.7 days for male
offenders and 159.6 days for female offenders.
Average (median) length of time between an offender’s first and second bookings was 158.0 days for black
offenders, 156.3 days for Hispanic offenders, and 144.2 days for white offenders.
TalkingPoint! Kent County has continued using an instrument to predict the likelihood that an inmate
booked into KCCF will be rebooked into KCCF at some future date. This "Proxy" instrument divides the inmates
into three levels, with R1's being the least likely to return to jail, R2's being in the middle, and R3's being the most
likely to return to jail. The breakdown of Proxy scores for individuals booked between 2019 and 2021 include -
R1: 13.6% // R2: 52.1% // R3: 34.3%. One of the reasons for this disparity is that the proxy is administered only
Looking at the 661 offenders that received a low category proxy score (R1) from the Recidivism Since 2019
page, male offenders averaged 2.0 bookings while female offenders averaged 2.2 bookings. Looking at the
1,845 offenders that received a high category proxy score (R3) from the same page, the average number of
bookings for male offenders averaged 3.3 bookings while female offenders averaged 3.1 bookings.
Looking at those offenders that received a low category proxy score (R1) from the Recidivism Since 2019
page, black offenders averaged 2.0 bookings, whites averaged 2.1 bookings, and Hispanics averaged 2.0
bookings. Switching to the offenders that received a high category proxy score (R3) from the same page,
the average for black offenders increases to 3.4 bookings, the average for white offenders increases to 3.1
bookings, and the average for Hispanic offenders increases to 2.8 bookings.
page, the average (median) length of time between an offender’s first and second bookings was 145.4 days
for male offenders and 160.0 days for female offenders. Switching to those offenders receiving a high
category proxy score (R3), the average (median) length of time between an offender's first and second
bookings decreases to 126.4 days for male offenders as well as decreases to 129.4 days for female
offenders.
page, the average (median) length of time between an offender’s first and second bookings was 190.4 days
for black offenders, 166.0 days for Hispanic offenders, and 142.9 days for white offenders. Switching to
those offenders receiving a high category proxy score (R3), the average (median) length of time between
an offender's first and second bookings decreases to 124.6 days for black offenders, 132.1 days for white
offenders, and 128.5 days for Hispanic offenders.
Likelihood to Recidivate 24
Number of Inmates Brought to Jail by Arresting Agency
Top 5 Agencies Account for 82% of Incoming Inmates
Code Arresting Agency # of Arrests Percent of Total

4195 GRAND RAPIDS POLICE DEPARTMENT 5,105 37.94%
4100 KENT COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT 3,093 22.99%
SELF SELF REPORT OR TURN IN 1,377 10.23%
4189 WYOMING POLICE DEPARTMENT 1,323 9.83%
4168 KENTWOOD POLICE DEPARTMENT 1,040 7.73%
4169 WALKER POLICE DEPARTMENT 488 3.63%
4161 MICHIGAN STATE POLICE - GRAND RAPIDS 410 3.05%
4167 GRANDVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT 223 1.66%
OTH ANY OTHER ARRESTING AGENCY 83 0.62%
4140 ROCKFORD CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT 57 0.42%
DOC DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS 55 0.41%
4146 LOWELL POLICE DEPARTMENT 51 0.38%
4166 EAST GRAND RAPIDS PUBLIC SAFETY 44 0.33%
4147 SPARTA POLICE DEPARTMENT 42 0.31%
SPEC SPECTRUM HEALTH POLICE 15 0.11%
41FM FEDERAL MARSHALS 14 0.10%
USMSHL U. S. MARSHAL 13 0.10%
GRR GERALD R FORD INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT POLICE 7 0.05%
GRCC GRAND RAPIDS COMMUNITY COLLEGE CAMPUS POLICE 5 0.04%
4160 MICHIGAN STATE POLICE - 6TH DISTRICT HQ 3 0.02%
3413 MICHIGAN STATE POLICE - IONIA 1 0.01%
DEA DEA 1 0.01%
DNR DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 1 0.01%
FBI FBI 1 0.01%
TRANSCOR TRANSCOR PRISONER TRANSPORT 1 0.01%
USPT UNITED STATES PRISONER TRANSPORT 1 0.01%
Grand Total 13,454 100.00%
MICHIGAN STATE POLICE - GRAND RAPIDS

GRAND RAPIDS POLICE
3% DEPARTMENT
38%
WALKER POLICE
DEPARTMENT
4%
KENTWOOD POLICE
DEPARTMENT
8%
WYOMING POLICE
DEPARTMENT
10%
KENT COUNTY SHERIFF'S

SELF REPORT OR TURN IN DEPARTMENT
10% 23%
Arrests by Agency 25
Top Local Agency Arrest Trends Over the Last 10 Years
14000
Kent County Sheriff Walker Police Kentwood Police
Wyoming Police Grand Rapids Police
12000
11075
10900
10127
10529
10000
9373
9963
8768
8000
7242
6338
6015 6135
6000 5733
5469
6033
5730
5405
5105
4612
4000
2420 2489 3093

2136 2115 2188 2276 2857
2109 2026
2000
1417 1431 1320 1327 1335 1323
1250 1244
1171 1048
815 1040
488
695 319
694 636 578 702 710 694 704
0
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
TrendSpotter! The peak for Grand Rapids, Kent County and Wyoming was in 2003 (not shown on this chart).
Due to Covid-19, all agencies experienced significant decreases in arrests for 2020, which leveled off and then began to
increase again in 2021.
10 yr. Arresting Agency Trends 26

Marijuana-related Arrests by Year
MJ-related Arrests
800 30000
700
25000
600
671 606
20000
500 529 536
400 15000
300
10000
200
5000
100 143
66 60
0 0
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
MJ-related Arrests Total Bookings:
TalkingPoint! Marijuana was legalized in

Michigan with the passage of Proposal 1 in November
of 2018 and so 2019 was the 1st full year of arrests
under the new law. Unfortunately for tracking, the 2020
and 2021 numbers were significantly effected by Covid-
19 on arrests (particularly among the lower level
arrests). In addition, it should be noted that often a
marijuana-related charge may be just one of several
charges that an inmate is booked on, meaning that even
were the MJ charge not present, the person may have
been arrested anyway. This chart shows MJ-related
arrests presented against the backdrop of our total
bookings for the year in question to help place them in
context. It would seem that Proposal 1 has had at least
some small effect on our arrest and population
numbers, though to what extent it is still too early to tell.
~This page is a direct result of an outside request for this data.

Thankyou and as always we encourage
anyone with an inquiry or who needs help with a study to contact us. We are always interested in
working together to make this information helpful to consumers.
MJ Arrests 27
Types of Criminal Charges Over Time
Charge Type 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
TRAFFIC 7,682 7,708 7,983 7,502 7,465 7,523 6,063 3,266 4,257
DISORDERLY 6,005 5,454 5,129 5,278 4,911 5,023 4,802 2,784 2,818
DRUGS 2,837 2,946 2,870 3,140 2,639 2,687 2,108 1,383 1,806
OUIL 2,796 3,017 2,930 2,864 2,898 2,996 2,917 1,955 2,316
ASLT - MIS 3,109 3,280 3,376 3,671 3,720 3,503 3,433 2,868 3,209
LARCENY 3,217 3,435 3,376 3,409 3,421 3,270 3,148 1,883 1,941
FOC 2,297 2,339 2,613 2,782 2,883 2,997 2,921 1,151 718
ASLT - FEL 1,379 1,274 1,141 1,292 1,141 1,178 1,318 1,309 1,660
OTHER 1,715 1,758 1,727 1,803 1,624 1,437 806 567 674
LIQUOR 990 1,054 1,149 1,118 1,009 896 744 384 396
TRESPASS 670 745 924 914 739 608 640 401 441
FRAUD 585 486 461 428 438 417 426 241 230
DAMAGE 691 653 670 646 603 650 709 589 651
WEAPON 526 676 582 649 689 738 758 893 1,368
SEX OFFENS 268 238 190 227 191 194 151 98 63
HOME INVAS 359 275 230 221 150 157 160 151 190
SEX ASSLT 407 305 274 315 314 261 278 211 253
B&E 326 297 334 281 292 323 316 295 286
PROPERTY 243 278 227 256 256 266 277 262 349
ROBBERY 275 240 215 190 152 158 161 114 125
BURGLARY 102 72 34 29 28 22 16 18 14
PROSTITUTE 133 138 113 132 119 121 130 97 84
CHILD 217 256 241 225 191 209 207 120 172
MOTOR 110 112 82 112 106 120 128 137 155
EMBEZZLE 119 143 170 183 185 200 188 116 113
EXTORTION 38 29 26 23 18 21 15 13 9
FORGERY 49 64 71 54 50 59 93 47 49
ESCAPE 49 62 33 27 36 34 32 28 16
ARSON 27 22 23 18 19 14 17 28 39
HOMICIDE 19 25 30 39 15 28 43 29 21
KIDNAPPING 14 12 22 26 28 24 22 22 19
COMPUTER 39 59 55 82 70 64 62 40 56
9,000
Top 6 Charge Types
8,000
7,000
6,000
5,000
4,000
3,000
2,000
1,000
TRAFFIC DISORDERLY DRUGS OUIL ASLT - MIS LARCENY
0
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Charges over Time 28

Top Arrests by Home Zip Code of Inmate for
2021
CITY ZIP TOTAL CITY ZIP TOTAL

1 p GRAND RAPIDS 49507 1830 39 p DORR 49323 31
2 p GRAND RAPIDS 49503 1357 40 p IONIA 48846 30
3 p GRAND RAPIDS 49504 1065 41 p GRANT 49327 29
4 p KENTWOOD 49508 890 42 q HOWARD CITY 49329 26
5 p GRAND RAPIDS 49548 856 42 p GRAND HAVEN 49417 26
6 p WYOMING 49509 636 44 p COOPERSVILLE 49404 24
7 p GRAND RAPIDS 49505 620 45 p MIDDLEVILLE 49333 21
8 p EAST GR / GR 49506 447 45 p KALAMAZOO 49001 21
9 p WYOMING 49519 374 47 q ZEELAND 49464 19
10 p GRAND RAPIDS 49512 269 48 ; BENTON HARBOR 49022 18
11 p GRAND RAPIDS 49525 268 49 p SAGINAW 48601 17
12 p COMSTOCK PARK 49321 214 49 p BIG RAPIDS 49307 17
13 p CEDAR SPRINGS 49319 191 49 q GRAND RAPIDS 49502 17
14 p ROCKFORD 49341 188 49 q WHITE CLOUD 49349 17
15 p GRAND RAPIDS 49534 169 53 q MUSKEGON 49441 16
16 p GRAND RAPIDS 49546 163 54 p LAKEVIEW 48850 14
17 q GRANDVILLE 49418 154 54 q HASTINGS 49058 14
18 p SPARTA 49345 149 56 p CASNOVIA 49318 12
19 p LOWELL 49331 130 56 p MARNE 49435 12
20 p CALEDONIA 49316 110 58 p LUDINGTON 49431 11
21 p WALKER 49544 109 58 q KALAMAZOO 49007 11
22 p BYRON CENTER 49315 89 60 ; LANSING 48911 10
23 p MUSKEGON 49444 74 60 q ALLEGAN 49010 10
23 p GREENVILLE 48838 74 62 p STANTON 48888 9
25 p JENISON 49428 68 62 p BATTLE CREEK 49015 9
26 p KENT CITY 49330 68 62 p SOUTH HAVEN 49090 9
27 q ADA 49301 60 62 ; TRUFANT 49347 9
28 q MUSKEGON 49442 55 62 p HOPKINS 49328 9
29 p HUDSONVILLE 49426 53 62 p LANSING 48910 9
30 p BELDING 48809 51 62 q KALAMAZOO 49009 9
31 q SAND LAKE 49343 49 69 p MOUNT PLEASANT 48858 8
31 p ALTO 49302 49 69 q PIERSON 49339 8
33 p BELMONT 49306 45 69 ; SHELBYVILLE 49344 8
34 p HOLLAND 49423 42 69 p CLARKSVILLE 48815 8
35 p HOLLAND 49424 39 69 p BITELY 49309 8
36 q WAYLAND 49348 37 69 p N. MUSKEGON 49445 8
37 q ALLENDALE 49401 32 69 p GRAND RAPIDS 49514 8
37 p GOWEN 49326 32 69 p LANSING 48906 8
39 p GRAND RAPIDS 49501 31
39 q NEWAYGO 49337 31
The above chart shows the top home address zip codes of arrestees for 2021. The green arrows show zip
codes that went down in number from 2020, while the red arrows show those zip codes that saw an
increase from 2020. Due to Covid, every zip code witnessed a decrease in arrests during 2020, which led
to the increase in most zip codes for 2021.
Arrests by Zip Code 29

2021 Arrest Map by Home Zip Code
Kent Co. Arrest Map 30

Annual Classification Numbers for 2021
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Primary Class 9,740 9,419 9,057 8,299 7,734 7,578 6,832 6,590 6,580 3,442 3,695
Agg Review Class 1,171 1,170 1,098 1,094 1,059 970 992 890 913 703 973
Mit Review Class 8,206 8,744 8,319 7,377 7,474 7,598 7,057 7,463 8,162 5,230 6,015
All Classifications 19,117 19,333 18,474 16,770 16,267 16,146 14,881 14,943 15,655 9,375 11,546
Inmate Cell Moves 39,659 40,495 39,047 40,173 40,024 38,804 36,894 37,278 33,405 20,872 27,232
AFIS Verifications 25,452 25,421 24,708 23,929 24,542 24,071 21,130 19,931 17,959 9,906 11,889
AFIS % of NBI's 99% 99% 99% 97% 99% 98% 95% 99% 99% 99% 99%
ARU Hearings 82 130 70 115 130 135 126 166 133 133 98
Alerts Entered 29,846 35,138 33,953 35,419 36,003 32,015 30,672 27,504 29,419 25,304 32,991
Case Notes 1,016 2,606 1,149 2,566 1,768 1,501 657 496 1,115 189 80
Primary Classifications Done

9740
9419
9057
8299
7734 7578
6832 6590 6580
3442 3695
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
All Classifications Done

19,117 19,333
18,474
16,770 16,267 16,146
14,943 15,655
14,881
11,546
9,375
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Inmate Cell Moves
39,659 40,495 40,173 40,024

39,047 38,804
36,894 37,278
33,405
27,232
20,872
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Classification Work 31
Average Amount of Time Inmates Stay in Jail, Shown with
Inmates Grouped by Release Type
AVERAGE LENGTH OF STAY
Average Of All Inmates 11.9
Average Of All Inmates

Who Are Not Released 37.4
Within 72 Hours
Released to Prison 89.1
TalkingPoint! The significant increase in average

Released to Other Agency 18.2 stays for those inmates not released within 72 hours
and those released to prison are primarily a result of
DOC restricting new admissions for much of the year
Released at Court 14.0 due to Covid-19.
TalkingPoint! Based on statewide data, the average

Fines Paid 3.4 length of stay for an inmate in a Michigan jail in 2010
(Last recorded state data) was 20 days compared to our
10 in 2020. This number has been stable for many years.
Detainer Lifted 13.7
Charges Dismissed 2.4

TrendSpotter! The average length of stay for
inmates released time served (after serving a county
sentence) was 46 days in 2001. For 2016 it was 26
days, while for 2017 it rose to 30 days. 2020 saw a
Time Served 34.7 5th consecutive increase to over 33 days.
Bonded 4.7
0 20 40 60 80 100
The graph above was based on a sample of 11,895 inmates released in 2021.
 TalkingPoint! The pie charts below contain a comparison of the Average Length of Stay (ALOS) at the
time of the Bennett jail expansion study and the ALOS in 2021, depicting the much shorter ALOS in 2021.
1989 2021 1989 2021

< 1 day 28.17% 46.42%
1 day 13.55% 15.74%
2 to 4 days 12.90% 12.77%
5 to 15 days 14.84% 10.42%
16 to 30 days 6.24% 5.74%
31+ days 24.30% 8.91%
ALOS by Release Type 32

Average Length of Stay Depicted as Jail Bed Days
20000
18000
16000
14000
12000
10000
8000
6000
4000
2000
0
16 to 30
31 to 60
61 to 90
> 331
<1
2 to 4
91 to 120
5 to 15
121 to 150
151 to 180
181 to 210
211 to 240
241 to 270
271 to 300
301 to 330
TalkingPoint! This chart shows the concept of average # of Days in Jail

<1
# of Inmates
5522
length of stay depicted as Jail Bed Days. Jail Bed Days are an
1 1872
accurate way of displaying the actual impact on jail beds, because
2 to 4 1519
it is counting the days that a jail bed is occupied. The chart above
shows that although we had 5,522 people who stayed less than 5 to 15 1239
one day in jail, they used far fewer jail beds than the 1,239 inmates 16 to 30 683
who stayed 5 to 15 days in jail. In fact, the 131 inmates who 31 to 60 391
stayed 121 to 150 days used the most jail beds. The primary 61 to 90 219
takeaway of these data is that the greatest impact on jail capacity 91 to 120 125
would be achieved by concentrating our efforts on reducing the 121 to 150 131
stay of the inmates who are in jail from one to five months. It is that 151 to 180 53
group of inmates who are using most of the jail's beds. Departures 181 to 210 47
from normal numbers this year are due to both the reduced 211 to 240 33
numbers of low-level offenders on one end, and the increased 241 to 270 30
length of stay of those inmates awaiting court and those sentenced 271 to 300 20
to and awaiting prison on the other end, both due to Covid-19. 301 to 330 10
> 331 1
ALOS as Jail Bed Days 33

Of Inmates Released, Most Common Reasons Why
The Majority of Incoming Inmates Released Back to the Community
Time Served
13%
Released to Other
Agency
9%
Sent to Prison
2%
Released at Court
5%
Other
1% Bonded
63%
Fines Paid
1%
Detainer Lifted
2%
Charges Dismissed
4%
TalkingPoint! In 2021, approximately 89% of the inmates who came into our
jail were released directly back into the community. This chart is based on a sample
of almost 12,000 records in 2021. Only about 11% were sent to prison or to another
agency. Hard data is not available on that 11%, but most of those inmates also
return to our community at some point. It is important to remember that resources
devoted to local jail inmates benefit our local communities.
Release by Type 34
Number of Days Inmates Spend in Jail Before Release
91% of All Inmates Are in Jail Less than 30 Days
Percent of Inmates Released After 1 day, 2 days, 3 days, etc.

100%
100%
99%
97%
90% 94%
87% 92%
91%
80%
80%
76%
75% 91% of all inmates are here less than 30 days.
70% 73%
69%
62%
60%
62% of all inmates are here 47 hours or less.
50%
46%
40%
TalkingPoint! 46% of all inmates coming to jail are here 23 hours or less.
30%
20%
10%
0%
<1 1 2 3 4 5 6-9 10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-99 100 - 199 >200
Releases by Days In Jail 35

Number of Hours Inmates Spend in Jail Before Being
Released on Bond
77% of All Inmates Who Posted Bond did so Within the First 48 hours
Of the inmates who post bond, the percentage who bond in 1 hour, 2 hours, 3 hours, etc.,
after admission.
50% 100%
98%
TalkingPoint! By the end of first 48 hours in jail, 77% of the

inmates who are going to bond out, have bonded out.
45% 90%
40% 80%
77%
35% 70%
30% 60%
60%
TalkingPoint! 32% of all inmates who posted bond did so in 56%
58%
59%
10 hours or less. 55%

53%
25% 50%
51%
49%
47%
45%
20% 42% 40%

40%
37%
32%
35%
30%
15% 27% 30%
25%
22%
19%
10% 20%
17%
13%
8%
5% 10%
3%
0%
0% 0%
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25- 49+
48
Bonds Posted by Hours in Jail 36

Agency Billing Information
Billing Other Agencies Nets Over Half a Million Dollars
Agency 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
MDOC $39,200.00 $50,050.00 $54,460.00 $39,795.00 $36,365.00 $20,265.00 $31,920.00
Grand Rapids $512,253.89 $515,615.87 $586,401.87 $497,044.09 $412,674.08 $233,949.76 $244,129.30
Grandville PD $78,344.76 $76,069.23 $95,822.06 $81,354.69 $63,653.16 $26,988.83 $28,681.17
Immigration $11,004.40 $8,585.00 $17,935.00 $19,295.00 $1,700.00 $0.00 $0.00
Kentwood PD $80,135.90 $75,787.76 $89,526.72 $63,780.40 $72,520.79 $38,760.59 $49,452.77
Walker PD $104,065.70 $110,831.78 $129,132.79 $93,551.66 $88,217.38 $44,557.95 $45,051.60
Wyoming PD $318,417.50 $291,809.58 $318,527.23 $306,422.95 $286,257.99 $150,551.34 $118,816.00
Federal $440.00 $360.00 $1,280.00 $1,560.00 $2,320.00 $2,880.00 $4,680.00
Border Patrol $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Army $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
GRCC $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
SIR $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Total $1,143,862 $1,129,109 $1,293,086 $1,102,804 $963,708 $517,953 $522,731
Daily Rate $41.02 $41.31 $42.18 $42.35 $42.76 $42.93 $43.49
State of
Michigan
(billing is done
by the Office of
Community
Corrections -
this info based
on their FY) $1,088,015 $1,095,052 $1,198,385 $1,101,220 $1,186,464 $1,194,180 $760,000
Agency Distribution for 2021

Feds
MDOC
0.1%
6%
MDOC
Wyoming PD
Grand Rapids
23%
Grandville PD
Immigration
Walker PD
9%
Kentwood PD
Grand Rapids
47%
Walker PD Kentwood PD
9%
Wyoming PD
Grandville PD
Immigration 5%
Federal 0%
Agency Billing 37
Processing Fees for the Last Ten Years
Charging Agencies to Process New Inmates Nets Over $135,000
Grand Rapids PD Kentwood PD Wyoming PD Grandville PD GRCC Walker TOTAL
2011 $162,769.00 $16,182.12 $34,062.40 $9,465.04 $237.02 $8,355.60 $231,071.18
2012 $163,517.66 $17,048.26 $33,786.71 $8,206.69 $267.78 $9,407.88 $232,234.98
2013 $136,561.09 $14,065.34 $32,766.46 $5,283.98 $238.47 $8,855.66 $197,771.00
2014 $156,816.47 $20,111.85 $33,674.25 $7,823.85 $280.53 $8,541.00 $227,247.95
2015 $156,081.40 $21,370.86 $34,195.10 $6,788.24 $308.95 $8,917.54 $227,662.09
2016 $146,461.89 $20,337.77 $33,789.87 $6,797.07 $129.79 $9,802.92 $217,319.31
2017 $135,612.71 $20,580.98 $35,698.73 $6,919.70 $124.36 $10,040.82 $208,977.30
2018 $131,489.14 $20,702.75 $33,212.72 $6,414.51 $82.80 $9,479.76 $201,381.68
2019 $113,818.94 $19,026.39 $33,260.16 $6,558.98 $94.20 $9,613.72 $182,372.39
2020 $75,333.36 $12,973.51 $21,572.58 $3,831.96 $17.26 $5,031.55 $118,760.22
2021 $84,482.22 $16,329.54 $24,886.76 $3,847.52 $14.57 $7,318.46 $136,879.07
GRCC Percentage of Total Fees

0%
Grandville PD
3% Walker
5%
Wyoming PD
18% Grand Rapids PD
Kentwood PD
Wyoming PD
Grand Rapids PD
Grandville PD
62%
GRCC
Walker
Kentwood PD
12%
2011 booking fee was $15.29 2011 total billed was $231,071
2013
2019booking
bookingfee
feewas
was$15.55
$16.87 2019 total billed was $182,372
Processing Fees 38
Room and Board Collection Efforts
Room & Board Outside Collections Paid to Kent County % of Billings

Total
Year Billed to Agency's through collections Paid by Inmate actually
Collected
inmates Commission process Collected
2007 $2,567,477.00 $12,151.30 $22,414.91 $79,864.73 $102,279.64 3.98%
2008 $2,799,579.02 $16,833.61 $30,118.29 $73,639.43 $103,757.72 3.71%
2009 $3,222,504.00 $14,960.30 $25,180.84 $63,518.51 $88,699.35 2.75%
2010 $2,680,984.00 $9,722.23 $16,767.54 $64,838.84 $81,606.38 3.04%
2011 $2,755,224.00 $13,690.16 $24,050.00 $62,441.67 $86,491.67 3.14%
2012 $2,993,760.00 $21,769.21 $37,463.20 $86,985.41 $124,448.61 4.16%
2013 $2,827,152.00 $17,140.85 $31,378.69 $62,986.11 $94,364.80 3.34%
2014 $2,770,614.00 $18,648.29 $34,045.58 $70,527.81 $104,573.39 3.77%
2015 $2,893,110.00 $16,725.40 $30,784.70 $82,565.98 $113,350.68 3.92%
2016 $3,348,861.00 $9,542.72 $16,543.88 $111,092.36 $127,636.24 3.81%
2017 $3,704,820.00 $10,617.59 $18,442.17 $110,112.20 $128,554.37 3.47%
2018 $3,261,405.00 $11,040.44 $19,390.72 $90,119.87 $109,510.59 3.36%
2019 $3,188,703.00 $6,709.16 $11,635.17 $72,209.00 $83,844.17 2.63%
2020 $2,269,113.00 $5,347.66 $9,116.69 $53,075.63 $62,192.32 2.74%
2021 $1,713,180.00 $9,996.05 $17,142.03 $61,822.61 $78,964.64 4.61%
Percentage of Collections - 2021

Paid to Kent County
through collections
process 22%
Paid by Inmate
78%
Collection Totals by Year

$0.00 $20,000.00 $40,000.00 $60,000.00 $80,000.00 $100,000.00 $120,000.00 $140,000.00
2011 $86,491.67
2012 $124,448.61
2013 $94,364.80
2014 $104,573.39
2015 $113,350.68
2016 $127,636.24
2017 $128,554.37
2018 $109,510.59
2019 $83,844.17
2020 $62,192.32
2021 $78,964.64
Collections 39
County Jail Reimbursement Program
Fiscal Year 2021 Update by Andy VerHeek
CJRP reimbursement and eligibility criteria continued in the same manner during FY 2021 that were implemented
in previous fiscal years. The table below shows that Kent County experienced a significant decrease in the amout
of funds received through CJRP from $1,194,180 in FY 2020 to $760,000 during FY 2021.
Reimbursement and eligibility criteria for CJRP continue to include:
1. All counties in Michigan are required to follow the same eligibility and reimbursement criteria.
2. Three different reimbursement amounts are provided and depend upon each offender's sentencing guideline
score and type of offense.
3. Save for a few select offenses, a majority of Crime Class F offenses have remained ineligible for reimbursement
during FY 2021.
In addition to these changes, CJRP monies received by Kent County are impacted by the length of stay in the Kent
County Correctional Facility for each offender as well as the jail disposition rate for CJRP-eligible offenders
sentenced in Kent County. Both of these were significantly impacted by the ongoing COVID pandemic in FY 2020
and FY 2021.
FISCAL YEAR CJRP PAYMENT TOTAL RECEIVED

1997 $731,460.00 $731,460.00
1998 $695,225.00 $1,426,685.00
1999 $699,353.00 $2,126,038.00
2000 $1,244,996.00 $3,371,034.00
2001 $1,120,632.00 $4,491,666.00
2002 $1,212,242.00 $5,703,908.00
2003 $1,063,183.50 $6,767,091.50
2004 $1,069,839.00 $7,836,930.50
2005 $968,571.00 $8,805,501.50
2006 $791,613.00 $9,597,114.50
2007 $837,505.50 $10,434,620.00
2008 $1,084,846.50 $11,519,466.50
2009 $734,584.50 $12,254,051.00
2010 $607,234.50 $12,861,285.50
2011 $835,895.50 $13,697,181.00
2012 $928,264.50 $14,625,445.50
2013 $833,855.00 $15,459,300.50
2014 $963,095.00 $16,422,395.50
2015 $1,088,015.00 $17,510,410.50
2016 $1,095,052.00 $18,605,462.50
2017 $1,198,385.00 $19,803,847.50
2018 $1,101,220.00 $20,905,067.50
2019 $1,186,464.00 $22,091,531.50
2020 $1,194,180.00 $23,285,711.50
2021 $760,000.00 $24,045,711.50
Thanks! A big thank you to Andy Verheek for providing the information for this page as well as the information
for the three pages in this report titled "Recidivism Since 2014", "Recidivism Since 2019", and "Likelihood to Recidivate."
CJRP 40
Total Counts of Incidents and Inmate Rule Violations
Code Description of Incident 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
BLOOD Blood draw for drunk driving arrest 413 402 360 439 466 450 462 470 529 394 436
CERT CERT team deployment 20 25 14 16 34 60 51 46 53 36 24
IRH Immediate Restrictive Housing 204 253 185 148 167 161 165 268 223 124 64
INFO Information report 613 408 399 534 785 853 954 913 919 867 1235
S3 suicide precaution 271 275 159 214 171 194 170 171 173 174 233
Total of Informational Reports 1521 1363 1117 1351 1623 1718 1802 1868 1897 1595 1992
V101 failure to clean cell or assist in clean up 495 659 361 314 147 203 232 222 394 244 83
V102 possession of extra clothing or bedding 238 414 99 106 89 368 419 144 185 46 13
V103 possess food not sold in commissary 82 66 74 31 31 65 73 24 7 13 3
V104 hanging clothing from walls or bars 338 182 21 13 46 115 48 69 29 22 23
V105 covering lights or obstructing vision 486 221 192 125 118 509 452 514 402 282 277
V106 jail uniform violation 183 221 267 245 184 73 128 59 76 63 74
V107 shouting or acting in a disruptive way 2742 3423 2749 2408 2307 2643 2383 2282 1,977 1,827 1,929
V108 failure to follow housing unit rules 2903 5543 3553 3384 3371 5599 6466 5516 4,711 3,353 3,811
V109 failure to follow meal time rules 215 349 231 152 217 227 341 262 241 233 278
V110 failure to hang up phone when required 24 30 17 15 18 7 24 13 15 14 10
V111 tattoo or self mutilation violation 0 0 3 2 0 0 0 2 2 0 0
V112 ID card violation 0 0 0 0 2 2 10 0 3 0 0
V113 pass, sell, borrow or trade violation 148 152 123 99 112 129 116 61 51 45 48
V114 throwing trash in common areas 170 186 19 16 11 39 69 28 58 38 46
V115 misuse of the intercom 399 533 414 296 467 509 472 414 447 330 417
V116 gambling violation 1 13 10 5 4 9 1 0 0 3 0
V117 attempt to commit a Cat 1 0 1 1 5 2 2 0 0 3 1 0
V118 talking through the vents 41 33 25 26 18 35 30 31 40 45 20
V119 possessing another's radio 14 6 7 4 9 5 17 17 1 4 0
V120 altering county property 63 153 40 40 30 104 41 32 42 36 40
V121 plugging vents in cell 278 305 73 81 39 232 46 82 9 81 11
V122 hanging sheets / privacy curtain 73 17 11 25 25 44 18 10 10 10 9
V123 Covering face or neck 18 22 118 17 67 20 8
Total Category 1 Violations 8893 12507 8290 7392 7265 10941 11504 9799 8770 6710 7100
V201 failure to give name 16 2 1 0 1 0 4 2 4 1
V202 vulgar or obscene language 58 59 50 70 72 76 104 66 56 34 29
V203 indecent exposure 3 6 4 7 2 now v.333 now v.333 now v.333 now v.333 now v.333 now v.333
V204 lying 24 10 14 15 25 14 11 9 9 7 8
V205 possess tobacco or matches 20 6 11 17 4 5 4 2 5 1 2
V206 coming out of cell 3 10 3 7 5 16 10 26 18 10 13
V207 spit on another inmate 8 13 1 5 6 7 11 6 11 6 8
V208 going to an unauthorized area 6 6 2 5 11 2 1 0 3 7 2
V209 going into another's cell 11 6 2 6 3 6 5 7 11 7 8
V210 interfering with headcount 26 15 16 10 4 5 4 4 2 1 1
V211 making intoxicants 6 4 18 4 7 13 13 10 12 9 14
V212 planning an escape 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
V213 stealing 20 23 25 29 31 14 41 45 45 24 29
V214 misuse of medication 20 14 13 27 19 26 21 18 37 28 34
V215 sexual threat/prop to inmate 5 2 4 5 0 now v.334 now v.334 now v.334 now v.334 now v.334 now v.334
V216 sexual proposals to staff 2 1 1 1 0 now v.335 now v.335 now v.335 now v.335 now v.335 now v.335
V217 consentual sexual acts 2 6 1 2 1 now v.336 now v.336 now v.336 now v.336 now v.336 now v.336
V218 threatening another inmate 18 6 17 15 26 14 20 12 16 10 19
V219 racketeering 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0
V220 possess contraband 11 9 14 10 15 10 13 8 22 4 4
V221 emerg-failure to lock down 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 2 3 5
V222 fighting with another inmate 164 211 165 157 128 144 178 190 192 129 219
V223 failure to move 63 64 36 36 38 41 54 65 47 72 120
V224 hinder or oppose staff 37 47 66 41 64 66 71 92 106 83 95
V225 blocking or propping a door 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 1 0
V226 gang related activity 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
V227 tampering with razor 4 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 2 2 0
V228 failure to follow visiting rules 4 3 4 0 1 1 2 3 0 1 1
V229 attempting or aiding a Category 2 3 6 2 2 1 2 1 4 3 3 2
V230 defecating or urinating outside of toilet 1 2 0 0 0 6 5 2 2 3 2
V231 harassing phone calls 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
V232 running a store 0 2 0 5 2 0 1 2 0 0 0
Incidents - Main Jail (pt 1) 41

Total Counts of Incidents and Inmate Rule Violations
(cont.)
Code Description of Incident 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
V301 criminal code violation 6 0 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
V302 assaulting another inmate 50 62 43 49 42 46 52 61 60 50 76
V303 assaulting an inmate w/ weapon 1 4 3 0 2 2 0 1 1 1 2
V304 sexual assault another inmate 0 1 2 2 0 2 0 0 1 0 0
V305 attempting to escape 0 2 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 1
V306 walk away 1 0 1 0 3 1 0 1 0 0 2
V307 escape 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
V308 rioting or encouraging same 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
V309 disobeying staff orders 33 32 47 28 23 26 22 14 17 9 11
V310 failure to lock up 57 42 34 18 26 27 45 21 21 27 31
V311 setting a fire 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
V312 possess or make a weapon 0 1 2 1 0 0 1 1 8 3 6
V313 possession of an unauthorized tool 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
V314 possession of narcotics / paraphernalia 15 2 4 6 3 5 2 7 19 5 5
V315 introduction of contraband 1 6 8 7 10 4 6 4 7 9 5
V316 reckless behavior 6 5 5 5 4 2 2 2 3 4 7
V317 tampering with locking device 5 2 2 1 0 3 1 1 1 2 7
V318 assaulting a staff person 2 7 7 2 10 9 7 6 11 11 12
V319 assaulting staff w/ a weapon 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
V320 threatening a staff person 8 24 28 15 22 23 33 20 16 19 27
V321 spitting / throwing on a staff person 2 3 4 4 8 8 9 6 8 5 12
V322 tampering with staff property 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 2 0 0
V323 causing damage to facility 31 10 14 13 14 8 15 11 24 11 37
V324 causing a flood / plugging plumbing 15 12 10 6 6 13 11 3 5 1 2
V325 violation of honor camp program rules 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
V326 violation of work release program rules 48 61 71 89 80 70 39 29 23 2 1
V327 violation of sober living program rules 15 9 1 10 7 6 1 0 1 0 0
V328 violation of education pod rules 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
V329 violation of trusty guidelines 8 6 47 48 71 37 48 37 37 10 12
V330 manipulate cell assignment 19 15 13 9 18 16 12 18 18 16 10
V331 attempt a Cat 3 0 8 2 1 2 1 0 1 0 0 5
V332 Possession of another inmates ID 0 0 3 0 0 0 0
V333 Indecent Exposure was v.203 5 7 4 6 2 3 3
V334 Sexual threat/ proposal another inmate was v.215 4 5 2 0 2 2 0
V335 Sexual proposal to staff was v.216 4 1 0 1 0 3 3
V336 Engage in consenting sex was v.217 6 4 2 4 6 0 0
V337 False accusation of sexual misconduct 0 1 0 1 1 0 0
Total Category 3 Violations
282 258 279 229 289 257 280 227 271 192 274
without V306, V325 & V326
Total of Category 2 and
Category 3 Violations 868 856 822 797 840 797 896 836 899 640 892
Total of All Categories 9761 13363 9112 8189 8105 11738 12400 10635 9669 7350 7992
Description of Action 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Signal Brown (officer needs emergency assistance) 6 6 8 4 6 4 4 6 10 0 13
Signal Whites called (inmate medical emergency) 19 33 32 45 39 29 19 24 11 31 33
Signal Blues called (suicide attempt in progress) 2 13 6 9 9 9 10 12 6 5 15
Signal Greens called (inmate fight in progress) 72 92 83 63 61 55 52 40 34 20 51
Signal Oranges called (fire) 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Signal Red (major disturbance or riot) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Use of force reports 88 119 160 169 230 175 158 138 134 87 94
Warning for a category 1 violation 896 1091 1776 1563 1299 924 599 420 309 335 311
One Day Time In for a category 1 violation 1352 2162 2479 2563 2447 2562 2176 1759 1424 1285 1163
Two Days Time In for a category 1 violation 361 431 517 633 489 555 639 678 486 404 387
Three Days Time In for a category 1 violation 1147 1439 1195 1085 1132 1138 1553 1668 1705 1559 2155
Incidents - Main Jail (pt 2) 42

Number of Serious Rule Violations Indexed to
Population
A Way to Depict Change with Changing Inmate Population
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Jail Bed Days 384,134 381,633 372,591 391,755 332,631 352,368 377,752 362,216 330,956 360,033 392,125 406,506 409,033 394,571 291,099 335,550
total rule
violations 798 834 853 818 710 819 795 750 708 757 726 857 806 876 638 889
per 1000 Jail

Bed Days 2.08 2.19 2.29 2.09 2.13 2.32 2.10 2.07 2.14 2.10 1.85 2.11 1.97 2.22 2.19 2.65
2.65
2.29 2.32
2.19 2.13 2.14 2.22 2.19
2.08 2.09 2.10 2.07 2.10 2.11
1.97
1.85
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
 TalkingPoint! With fluctuations in the jail population, converting Incident Based data to the number of rule violations
committed per 1000 Jail Bed Days gives a more accurate picture of inmate behavior. 2021 witnessed a significant increase in this
behavioral metric. It is impossible to know the reasons for this, but ongoing widespread Covid effects on the population to include
general anxiety, restrictions on inmate routines and continual atypical changes in classficiation housing assignments may contribute.
We will watch this with interest as the impact of Covid hopefully wanes in 2022.
Incidents Per Jail Bed Days 43

Total Number of Category 1, 2 and 3 Rule Violations in the
Last Eleven Years
14000
12000 11504
12507
9799
10000 10941
8290
8000 8893 8770
6710
7392 7265
6000 7100
4000 Number of Category 1 violations
2000
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
700
Number of Category 2 violations 615

605
577 579
600
537 537
500 479 469

471 468
446
400
Number of Category 3 violations
300
282 289
279 280 274
271
258 257
200 229 227
192
100
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
These graphs show the number of Category 1, 2, and 3 reports per year over the last
decade. We have three levels of disciplinary rule violations in the jail. The most minor rule
violations are Category 1 violations. Category 2 violations are more serious and Category
3 violations are the most serious. Our disciplinary philosophy is that we would rather deal
with an inmate's misbehavior while it is still minor, which is why there are more Category 1
violations than 2's, and more 2's than 3's. Inmates committing Category 2 and 3 violations
go to the jail's Disciplinary Restrictive Unit (DRU) to complete their disciplinary sanctions.
Incident Trends - Main Jail 44

Annual Gang Admissions
Month 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
January 124 99 117 111 130 118 102 92 104 104 74 73 47
February 119 103 94 121 97 87 98 82 84 69 80 55 44
March 123 123 138 122 131 73 112 113 115 108 59 41 52
April 133 119 134 121 120 123 110 110 98 94 85 23 46
May 149 130 120 131 125 138 105 108 90 94 88 21 43
June 117 136 153 127 114 111 120 101 123 81 73 26 51
July 130 129 112 126 127 119 123 107 113 94 84 39 61
August 145 141 133 130 125 111 121 109 125 89 88 57 52
September 140 107 136 123 89 104 94 112 102 84 60 54 58
October 138 132 110 95 107 109 115 93 97 93 63 43 49
November 118 107 111 130 106 90 88 108 92 75 69 53 55
December 120 103 140 90 109 120 114 90 82 63 81 48 43
Total 1556 1429 1498 1427 1380 1303 1302 1225 1225 1048 904 533 601
Gang Admissions by Year

1800
1600 1556
1498
1429 1427
1380
1400
1303 1302
1225 1225
1200
1048
1000
904
800
601
600 533
400
200
0
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
When reviewing the information on this page, it should be remembered that it is collected
through a combination of self-identification at the book-in stage, jail intelligence sources, and
inmate history. As a consequence, the actual number of gang admissions is certainly higher
than indicated by these numbers.
Gang Admissions 45
Index of Antisocial Inmate Behavior
Grouping of Rule Violations that Have to Do with Impolite or Socially
Unacceptable Behavior
"Antisocial" acts 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
vulgar language 80 75 60 60 58 59 50 70 72 76 104 66 56 34 29
indecent exposure 4 7 3 5 3 6 4 7 7 7 4 6 2 3 3
possess tobacco 33 25 20 18 20 6 11 17 4 5 4 2 5 1 2
possess narcotics 4 6 4 8 15 2 4 6 3 5 2 7 19 5 5
making intoxicants 1 11 4 0 6 4 18 4 7 13 13 10 12 9 14
stealing 20 26 29 14 20 23 25 29 31 14 41 45 45 24 29
consenting sex 2 2 0 7 2 6 1 2 7 4 2 4 6 0 0
racketeering 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0
urinating/defecating 2 2 4 2 1 2 0 0 0 6 5 2 2 3 2
spit / throw on inmate 12 16 21 12 8 13 1 5 6 7 11 6 11 6 8
spit / throw on staff 6 6 6 2 2 3 4 4 8 8 9 6 8 5 12
total 164 176 151 128 135 125 118 144 145 145 197 155 166 90 104
197
176
164 166
155
151
144 145 145
135
128 125
118
104
90
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Each of the inmate rule violations is identified as targeting one of five types of
unwanted behavior. Grouping the violations like this and considering the totals of
each group provides us with an index used to determine what types of behavior can
best be controlled by the kinds of sanctions we have available to us. This page
shows the violations which are considered to be antisocial behavior.
Antisocial Behavior 46
Index of Destructive Inmate Behavior
Grouping of Rule Violations that Have to Do with Damaging Property
"Destructive" acts 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
tamper with razor 3 0 0 0 4 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 2 2 0
set or make a fire 2 1 0 2 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
possess a tool 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
reckless behavior 1 6 7 5 6 5 5 5 4 2 2 2 3 4 7
tamper with lock 4 1 0 1 5 2 2 1 0 3 1 1 1 2 7
tamper staff property 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 2 0 0
damage to facility 2 8 7 17 31 10 14 13 14 8 15 11 24 11 37
flooding 2 11 17 12 15 12 10 6 6 13 11 3 5 1 2
total 14 29 31 39 66 35 32 27 25 27 29 19 37 20 53
66
53
39
37
35
32
31
29 29
27 27
25
20
19
14
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
unwanted inmate behavior. Grouping the violations like this and considering the
totals of each group provides us with an index used to determine what types of
behavior can best be controlled by the kinds of sanctions we have available to us.
This page shows the violations which are considered to be destructive behavior.
Destructive Behavior 47
Index of Noncompliant Inmate Behavior
Grouping of Rule Violations Relating to Not Following Orders
"Noncompliant" acts 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
failure to give name 3 1 1 23 16 2 1 0 1 0 4 2 4 1 0
lying 21 19 20 17 24 10 14 15 25 14 11 9 9 7 8
coming out of cell 5 6 17 5 3 10 3 7 5 16 10 26 18 10 13
going into other cell 12 18 10 10 11 6 2 6 3 6 5 7 11 7 8
misuse of meds 49 22 23 8 20 14 13 27 19 26 21 18 37 28 34
emerg-failure to lock up 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 2 3 5
failure to move 56 44 61 59 63 64 36 36 38 41 54 65 47 72 120
hinder staff 58 52 42 45 37 47 66 41 64 66 71 92 106 84 95
visiting rules 2 0 1 2 4 3 4 0 1 1 2 3 0 1 1
disobey staff orders 50 34 32 22 33 32 47 28 23 26 22 14 17 9 11
fail to lock up 46 51 62 36 57 42 34 18 26 27 45 21 21 27 31
manipulate cell 21 22 47 20 19 15 13 9 18 16 12 18 18 16 10
total 324 269 316 247 288 246 234 188 224 240 258 278 290 265 336
336
324
316
288 290
278
269 265
258
247 246
240
234
224
188
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
unwanted inmate behavior. Grouping the violations like this and considering the totals
of each group provides us with an index used to determine what types of behavior can
best be controlled by the kinds of sanctions we have available to us. This page shows
the violations which are considered to be noncompliant behavior. Over the last
several years, we have seen an uptick in this category of behavior.
Noncompliant Behavior 48
Index of Security Related Inmate Behavior
Grouping of Rule Violations Relating to Facility Security
"Security Related" 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
unauthorized area 3 8 9 7 6 6 2 5 11 2 1 0 3 7 2
interfere w/ count 0 1 0 0 26 15 16 10 4 5 4 4 2 1 1
possess contraband 13 18 13 14 11 9 14 10 15 10 13 8 22 4 4
block / prop door 1 1 2 1 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 1 0
attempt to escape 1 0 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 1
walkaway 11 5 0 1 1 0 1 0 3 1 0 1 0 0 2
escape 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
introduce contraband 9 5 5 1 1 6 8 7 10 4 6 4 7 9 5
gang activity 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
total 38 38 31 24 46 39 42 34 43 22 26 18 34 23 15
46
43
42
39
38 38
34 34
31
26
24
23
22
18
15
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
unwanted inmate behavior. Grouping the violations like this and considering the
totals of each group provides us with an index used to determine what types of
behavior can best be controlled by the kinds of sanctions we have available to
us. This page shows the violations which are considered to be related to the
security of the facility.
Security Behavior 49
Index of Violent Inmate Behavior
Grouping of Rule Violations Relating to Violent or Aggressive Behavior
"Violent" behavior 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
sexual threats 2 1 2 0 5 2 4 5 4 5 2 0 2 2 0
sex proposal to staff 2 4 0 2 2 1 1 1 4 1 0 1 0 3 3
threaten inmate 25 21 18 27 18 6 17 15 26 14 20 12 16 10 19
threatening staff 17 21 16 22 8 24 28 15 22 23 33 20 16 19 27
fighting 169 196 155 159 164 211 165 157 128 144 178 190 192 129 219
assault inmate 65 75 66 51 50 62 43 49 42 46 52 61 60 50 76
assault w/ weapon 4 0 4 0 1 4 3 0 2 2 0 1 1 1 2
assault staff 6 7 6 3 2 7 7 2 10 9 7 6 11 11 12
assault staff w/ wpn 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
sexual assault 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 2 0 2 0 0 1 0 0
possess weapon 3 7 2 1 0 1 2 1 0 0 1 1 8 3 6
riot 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
total 293 332 269 266 253 319 272 248 238 246 293 292 307 228 364
364
332
319
307
293 293 292
269 266 272
253 248 246
238
228
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Each of the inmate rule violations is identified as targeting one of five types
of unwanted inmate behavior. Grouping the violations like this and
considering the totals of each group provides us with an index used to
determine what types of behavior can best be controlled by the kinds of
sanctions we have available to us. This page shows the violations which are
considered to be violent behavior.

Talking Point! Inmates guilty of assault are 2x more likely than the
general population to be going through withdrawal, experiencing mental
health problems, be case managed in the community, or have previous
assaultive history in the jail.
Violent Behavior 50
Comparison - Index of Inmate Behavior
Compilation of the Previous Five Charts
400
364
350
332 336
324 319
316
307
300 292
288 293
293
266 290
272 278 265
269 269 248 246
250 258
253
247 246 238
240
234
224 228
197
200
176
188
164 166
151
144 145
150
155
128 125 145
135
118
100
104
90
66
53
50 38 38 39 42 43
39 34 37
31 29
46 27 23
19
35 32 34 15
29 31 27 26
24 25 22 18 20
14
0
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
"Antisocial" acts "Destructive" acts "Noncompliant" acts "Security Related" "Violent" behavior
This chart shows all five of the inmate behavior index's and how they performed over the last 15 years. This is a
compilation of the data used in the previous five charts. Each category showed significant variation over this period.
Recent factors that may influence these trends include the high number of new and relatively inexperienced staff and
several factors stemming from the Covid pandemic.
Behavior Trends 51
Suicide Attempts or Gestures Compared with the Total
Number of Suicide Precautions
2009 through 2021
400 total number of inmates placed on suicide precaution

inmates making suicide attempts or gestures
350
300
250
306
200
253 275
271
214
150 258
182
224
165 204 233
194 213
100
66 63
55
52 52 52
50 41
21 19 22
18
7 7
0
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
There were 10 successful suicides during this 13 year time period

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
inmates making suicide
52 66 52 55 41 63 52 21 19 18 7 7 22
attempts or gestures
total number of inmates placed
306 253 271 275 165 214 182 204 194 224 213 233 258
on suicide precaution
Our highest level of suicide precaution places inmates in a cell under constant video surveillance. We track how inmates get
placed on that level of observation. Either they have made a suicide attempt or gesture, or they have made a suicidal threat
to a staff person, or they have been judged to be suicidal following an interview by one of our mental health professionals.
The chart above depicts the total number of "S-3's" (the highest level of precaution) and of that number, the number that
were declared S-3's because of an actual in-progress attempt to harm themselves, either by hanging, an overdose, cutting
themselves, jumping from a height, drowning in a toilet, banging their head, or some other means. Despite a rising but still
lower than usual population, the number of inmates placed on S-3 status was significantly higher in 2021.
Suicide Precaution 52
Number of Fights by Housing Unit
Most fights occur in higher custody level areas
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total
Intake 1 1 1 1 2 6
B2B 1 3 4
B2C 1 2 1 4
B2D 1 1
B2F 0
B2G 1 1
B3B 1 1 2
B3C 0
B3D 1 1
B3F 1 1 2
B3G 0
B3H 0
D1A 1 1 1 3
D1B 1 1 1 1 4
D1C 1 1 2
D1D 1 1 1 3
D1F 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 11
D2A 1 1 2
D2B 1 1
D3A 1 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 3 3 3 20
D3B 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 10
H2A 1 1
H2B 0
H2C 1 1 2
1992 Jail 4 6 8 6 6 6 6 6 7 15 4 6 80
L1 1 1 2 2 6
L2 1 1 2 1 5
L3 1 1
M1 4 2 1 2 1 10
M2 2 1 1 1 1 1 7
M3 1 1 3 2 1 2 2 1 1 1 15
Kitchen 0
2013 Jail 4 2 3 7 1 3 2 4 8 6 2 2 44
2019 MJ total 8 8 11 13 7 9 8 10 15 21 6 8 124
Main Jail Fights by Year 2005-2021

125
100
75
50
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
TalkingPoint! Our old linear jail was replaced and demolished in Dec. of 2012. 61% of our fights in 2020 occurred in
non-full-direct supervision housing. It should be noted that due to Covid, there were significant changes in inmate classification
demographics and operational housing unit distribution again in 2021, more even than in 2020.
Fights by Housing Unit 53

Jail Information Program Statistics
Corrections Officers Report Information on Possible Crimes
Recipient Gang Drugs Homicide Assault Wpns/Shooting Arson Sex Crime Other Total
KCSO 18 3 3 2 26
GRPD 2 4 2 1 2 11
Kentwood 1 1
Muskegon Co. 1 1
Total 0 20 8 0 2 0 5 4 39
Known Photo Identifications by Jail Staff Leading to Warrants or Charges
Year Number
2012 3
2013 22
2014 9
2015 12
2016 24
2017 15
2018 35
2019 5
2020 9
2021 5 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
These tables present some of the information that is gathered by the jail staff
on particular crimes committed in the community. Corrections Officers play a
significant role in assisting law enforcement with criminal intelligence. This
information helps local police agencies identify suspects, which in many
cases has led to their arrest and conviction. The KCCF has 2 dedicated Jail
Intelligence Unit (JIU) officers who are responsible for the follow-up on all
generated intelligence reports, as well as acting as contact points for outside
agencies. This has been very successful in streamlining and enhancing the
effectiveness of intelligence-gathering efforts.
Until recent years, Jail staff were an underutilized resource for the photo
identification of suspects. Due to the facts that most suspects are repeat
offenders and that jail staff know them well, since 2013 there has been a
renewed emphasis on using this resource, with predictably successful
outcomes. Some of the disparity in numbers of identifications recorded from
year to year can be explained by the level of follow-up on identification
submissions.
Jail Information Program 54

Sally Port Assistance Provided to Arresting Agencies
Calls for Sally Port Assistance

350
293 290 285
300 271
247
250 222
200 169
150
100
50 22 13 15
9 6 6 3
0
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
SALLY-N (no use of force) SALLY-F (force utilized)
It has always been a custom of the

KCCF to provide a courtesy service to
arresting agencies who call ahead and
request assistance with uncooperative
arrestees. When notified, our intake
staff will meet the arresting agency in
the jail sally port and retrieve the
suspect directly from the agency
vehicle and escort them into our
facility. The information on this page
provides an important window into this
particular activity. We began officially
tracking these numbers in April of
2015, so the data for that year is
partial. What we are interested in is
how often these events result in a use
of force versus how often our staff are
able to de-escalate tense situations
without resorting to the use of force.
The numbers on this page are a credit
to the skill and professionalism of our
correctional intake staff in dealing with
the most difficult individuals at one of
their most stressful moments – arrival
at the jail.
Sallyport Assistance 55
Kent County Corrections K-9 Team proves itself
a valuable asset to both the jail and the
community
K-9 Assignments 1st quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter 2021 total
Narcotics Requests 5 4 9 12 30
School Searches 0 0 0 0 0
Jail Cell Searches 158 261 337 235 991
Inmate Area Searches 11 18 14 17 60
Assist Other Agency 3 4 2 1 10
Demos/PR 2 5 5 1 13
Finds 0 0 0 0 0
TalkingPoint! This chart presents a snapshot of the activities of our K-9 unit. Some K-9 operations
were reduced again in 2021 due to the Covid pandemic. The K-9 Unit consisted of 3 dogs in 2021 until July,
when Dep. Gonzalez and K-9 Shadow retired. They are a huge help in the continuing effort to keep our
facility both safe and drug-free!
K-9 Team 56
Health Services Report
PLACEMENT INFO Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total Average
Isolation Cell Placement 5 8 15 12 101 190 6 22 8 367 41
Medical Observation 16 16 8 14 9 8 19 22 10 122 14
ACCESS TO CARE
Intake Health Screenings 703 864 977 1063 1065 1022 878 706 865 8,143 905
Initial Health Assessments 199 114 381 141 137 178 189 48 148 1,535 171
Periodic Health Assessments 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 5 1
Health Care Requests Rec'd 2049 835 818 955 2939 812 858 891 444 10,601 1,178
Sick Call 512 945 659 955 520 898 1289 1049 693 7,520 836
Practitioner (HCP) Onsite Appts. 275 465 656 570 328 629 858 776 518 5,075 564
HCP Telehealth Appts. NA NA 1 4 5 5 6 6 5 32 4
Non-HCP F/U Care 201 371 465 385 511 511 561 273 290 3,568 396
Medical Refusals 4708 8614 8426 8253 8440 8427 778 669 880 49,195 5,466
CHRONIC CARE
Chronic Care Diagnosis 339 226 411 357 367 343 257 288 313 2,901 322
Asthma 82 88 126 103 109 91 88 88 70 845 94
CV/Hypertension 79 85 130 123 142 128 102 107 142 1,038 115
COPD 82 4 15 0 2 0 0 1 0 104 12
Diabetes 25 49 46 41 43 39 8 27 24 302 34
Seizures 70 67 66 69 48 60 44 45 52 521 58
Special Needs/Disabilities 0 3 15 5 4 4 3 3 3 40 4
Dialysis 1 1 2 2 2 5 0 1 1 15 2
Cancer 0 17 11 19 17 16 12 16 21 129 14
CC seen by HCP 67 87 137 75 100 32 25 16 9 548 61
CC seen by Other 27 0 0 0 0 72 39 89 15 242 27
MEDICATIONS
On Medications 699 823 921 995 1052 1055 1074 1091 1002 8,712 968
General Meds Ordered 3669 2123 2372 3220 2354 2294 2774 2507 2275 23,588 2,621
Psych Meds Ordered 1361 802 977 800 786 785 774 700 651 7,636 848
OTC Meds Ordered by HCP 73 64 51 24 25 0 0 30 0 267 30
DENTAL
Dental Requests for Svcs. NT NT NT 63 47 105 248 142 58 663 74
Dental Tech Visits 37 65 132 27 83 23 124 23 20 534 59
Dentist Visits 6 19 68 83 92 55 61 75 64 523 58
Oral Surgeries 0 6 29 34 42 37 43 44 48 283 31
PSYCH / MENTAL HEALTH
Psych HCP Onsite Appts. 135 217 250 184 202 218 216 211 203 1,836 204
DETOX
Withdrawal Protocols 380 613 456 95 176 137 175 155 179 2,366 263
Alcohol (ETHO) Use 309 337 296 422 147 75 175 357 352 2,470 274
Opiate Use 17 256 373 16 5 13 20 59 18 777 86
Benzos Use 4 20 57 12 5 7 8 11 9 133 15
Heroin Use 65 45 35 59 16 47 54 48 42 411 46
Meth Use 38 62 30 61 17 51 50 49 52 410 46
Suboxone Use 0 0 3 5 2 6 3 5 6 30 3
Other Substances 0 44 50 83 27 83 73 75 61 496 55
X-RAYS / IMAGING
Any Type of Imaging 26 76 38 42 43 47 70 63 85 490 54
Onsite X-Rays / Other (CT, etc.) 24 62 22 33 29 34 58 40 61 363 40
Offsite X-Rays / Other (CT, etc.) 0 0 0 1 2 2 0 7 4 16 2
Onsite Ultrasounds 2 14 16 9 12 13 12 13 20 111 12
Offsite Ultrasounds 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 0
SPECIALTY SERVICES
Rec'd Specialty Svcs. Onsite 127 394 362 271 168 195 43 262 480 2,302 256
Pregnancies Admitted 2 3 3 6 2 3 8 5 6 38 4
OB/GYN Visits 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 8 1
Ortho/PT Svcs. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
EKG NT 34 27 27 11 25 27 19 34 204 23
Labs/Blood Draws 35 563 257 200 268 319 216 181 371 2,410 268
Wound Care Tx 88 21 151 193 216 240 138 62 69 1,178 131
INFECTIOUS DISEASE
Confirmed New Diagnosis of Communicable Diseases 8 6 20 8 14 10 23 12 15 116 13
TB Skin Tests 31 56 20 77 68 67 66 20 22 427 47
Positive TB Skin Tests 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
HIV Tests Given 1 1 6 2 7 14 13 11 11 66 7
Total Facility # HIV Positive 1 9 8 3 7 8 2 1 4 43 5
Total Facility Hep C Positive 53 54 18 34 20 26 4 20 3 232 26
STD Tests Given 37 30 63 26 117 100 85 53 87 598 66
STD Tests Positive 7 6 20 8 14 10 23 12 15 115 13
INCIDENTS
Codes, 1st Aid, AED 12 19 12 7 9 16 39 13 3 130 14
Narcan Administered 2 1 2 1 0 3 0 0 2 11 1
Deaths 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0
Medical Services 57
Out of Facility Medical Statistics in 2021
HOSPITAL VISITS Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total
Pre-Bookings 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 0 5
Inpatient Admissions 6 6 8 2 5 28 4 4 4 67
Inmate Hospital Days - Monthly
Average Hospital Days - Daily
OFFSITE VISITS
Ambulance Transports 18 17 8 18 18 18 12 13 15 12 20 21 190
Cruiser Transports 12 17 11 22 20 27 23 28 22 22 13 22 239
Emergency Dept. 25 12 23 11 24 37 24 24 16 196
X-Rays 0 0 0 1 2 2 0 7 4 16
Ultrasounds 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3
Outpatient 1-day Surgery 0 1 0 1 1 4 1 2 0 10
Outpatient Clinic 34 29 29 34 22 30 43 50 46 317
Mental Health Transfers 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
TOTAL 30 34 19 99 81 97 82 90 110 102 119 109 972
400
350 Approved Out of Facility Medical - 2021
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
Emergency
Mental Health
Transports
Outpatient 1-
Outpatient
X-Rays
Ambulance
Ultrasounds
Transports
day Surgery
Cruiser
Transfers
Clinic
Dept.
Ambulance Transports by Year
200
190
175
150
125 116
100 106
93 94
75 77 82
68
50 54
25
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
The jail changed medical providers to begin 2021, explaining why many of the numbers for the first 3 months on these
pages are missing, and why some data that was tracked in previous years is now absent.
Medical Transports 58
Responses to Medical Survey Completed in Intake by Nurse
QUESTION % YES % NO
1. Do you have any current or past medical illness or health condition? 32.64% 67.36%
2. Do you have seizures or epilepsy? 5.73% 94.27%
3. Do you have asthma? 8.51% 91.49%
4. Do you have diabetes? 3.80% 96.20%
5. Do you have hepatitis? 1.92% 98.08%
6. Do you have HTN? 11.79% 88.21%
7. Do you have a heart condition? 2.69% 97.31%
8. Do you have an abnormal skin condition? 1.80% 98.20%
9. Do you have allergies? 17.10% 82.90%
10. Are you currently pregnant? 1.22% 98.78%
11. Have you given birth within the last 6 weeks? 0.19% 99.81%
12. Do you suffer from gynecological problems? 0.46% 99.54%
13. Have you recently had a head injury? 1.31% 98.69%
14. Do you have any infected wounds? 0.62% 99.38%
15. Do you have any dental problems? 13.97% 86.03%
16. Are you vomiting? 0.21% 99.79%
17. Have you been hospitalized due to a medical condition within the past month? 1.88% 98.12%
18. Are you currently receiving treatment for a medical condition? 17.13% 82.87%
19. Are you taking any medications? 22.96% 77.04%
20. Are you under a physician's care? 23.12% 76.88%
21. Is there anything else we need to know about your medical health history? 1.31% 98.69%
22. Do you want a jail physical? 39.22% 60.78%
23. Do you have any current or past history of an infectious disease? 1.91% 98.09%
24. Do you have any current or past history of TB? 0.30% 99.70%
25. Current symptoms of TB - Chronic cough w/ blood? Are you coughing up blood? 0.01% 99.99%
26. Current symptoms of TB - Have you had recent weight loss? 0.01% 99.99%
27. Current symptoms of TB - Have you had a recent appetite loss? 0.01% 99.99%
28. Current symptoms of TB - Do you have a fever? 0.00% 100.00%
29. Current symptoms of TB - Do you have night sweats? 0.01% 99.99%
30. Current symptoms of TB - Do you have fatigue? 0.01% 99.99%
31. Do you have any current sexually transmitted illnesses? 1.34% 98.66%
32. Do you currently have crabs? 0.02% 99.98%
33. Do you have currently have scabies? 0.08% 99.92%
34. Is there anything else we need to know about your infectious disease history? 0.47% 99.53%
35. Is the inmate alert and oriented x 3 (A&Ox3) 99.17% 0.83%
36. Normal gait? 98.14% 1.86%
37. Normal breathing? 99.59% 0.41%
38. Normal skin appearance? 96.58% 3.42%
39. Tremors? 0.79% 99.21%
40. Sweating? 0.30% 99.70%
41. Anxious? 1.59% 98.41%
42. Disheveled? 0.80% 99.20%
43. Lethargic? 0.74% 99.26%
44. Angry or agressive behavior? 0.87% 99.13%
45. Dilated pupils? 0.12% 99.88%
46. Presents as Cognitively challenged? 0.24% 99.76%
47. Presents as Confused and/or disoriented? 0.39% 99.61%
48. Crying? 1.39% 98.61%
49. Do you have health insurance? 46.45% 53.55%
50. Dental Screening Performed? 81.47% 18.53%
51. Referral to Nursing? 23.13% 76.87%
52. Referral to Physician? 20.38% 79.62%
53. Referral to Dentist? 2.17% 97.83%
54. Referral to Mental Health? 29.94% 70.06%
55. Vital Signs Taken? 78.12% 21.88%
Medical Screening Summary 59

"YES" Responses to Medical Survey Compared with Prior
Years
QUESTION 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
1. Any current or past health condition? 47.92% 51.97% 50.76% 53.09% 52.23% 46.70% 49.53% 32.64%
2. Do you have seizures or epilepsy? 4.39% 5.29% 5.88% 5.90% 5.68% 5.82% 6.07% 5.73%
3. Do you have asthma? 8.12% 8.88% 8.83% 8.13% 7.91% 6.24% 7.18% 8.51%
4. Do you have diabetes? 3.70% 3.92% 4.04% 3.90% 4.15% 4.29% 3.92% 3.80%
5. Do you have hepatitis? 2.47% 2.84% 2.56% 2.56% 2.93% 2.86% 2.53% 1.92%
6. Do you have HTN? 11.34% 12.95% 12.46% 12.14% 12.15% 10.79% 10.89% 11.79%
7. Do you have a heart condition? 2.76% 2.63% 2.79% 2.30% 1.77% 1.86% 2.15% 2.69%
8. Do you have an abnormal skin condition? 1.20% 0.89% 0.78% 0.56% 1.19% 1.33% 1.35% 1.80%
9. Do you have allergies? 20.86% 23.85% 23.42% 22.92% 23.56% 22.91% 19.85% 17.10%
10. Are you currently pregnant? 1.95% 1.73% 1.81% 1.58% 1.37% 1.71% 1.34% 1.22%
11. Have you given birth within the last 6 weeks? 0.20% 0.18% 0.18% 0.22% 0.14% 0.16% 0.11% 0.19%
12. Do you suffer from gynecological problems? 0.15% 0.29% 0.36% 0.21% 0.22% 0.40% 0.41% 0.46%
13. Have you recently had a head injury? 0.85% 0.86% 0.64% 0.57% 0.51% 0.74% 0.77% 1.31%
14. Do you have any infected wounds? 0.13% 0.18% 0.18% 0.26% 0.26% 0.45% 0.50% 0.62%
15. Do you have any dental problems? 8.14% 11.41% 18.23% 17.68% 20.20% 19.89% 19.76% 13.97%
16. Are you vomiting? 0.06% 0.07% 0.07% 0.04% 0.08% 0.17% 0.18% 0.21%
17. Been hospitalized within the past month? 3.84% 3.77% 3.42% 3.73% 3.94% 3.15% 4.41% 1.88%
18. Are you currently receiving treatment? 26.89% 27.33% 29.83% 30.27% 27.38% 25.42% 26.40% 17.13%
19. Are you taking any medications? 31.71% 36.06% 35.57% 34.84% 33.33% 29.58% 29.30% 22.96%
20. Are you under a physician's care? 33.88% 39.07% 38.83% 38.41% 38.06% 33.42% 31.82% 23.12%
21. Is there anything else we need to know? 0.27% 0.29% 0.17% 0.09% 0.20% 0.21% 0.23% 1.31%
22. Do you want a jail physical? 89.75% 92.03% 92.65% 93.39% 91.91% 80.79% 64.76% 39.22%
23. Any current or history of infectious disease? 1.39% 2.29% 1.86% 1.93% 1.44% 1.69% 1.98% 1.91%
24. Do you have any current or past history of TB? 0.74% 0.62% 0.54% 0.45% 0.49% 0.51% 0.47% 0.30%
25. Current symptoms of TB - Cough w/ blood? 0.02% 0.00% 0.01% 0.02% 0.02% 0.02% 0.00% 0.01%
26. Current symptoms of TB - Recent weight loss? 0.01% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.01% 0.01% 0.01%
27. Current symptoms of TB - Recent appetite loss? 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.02% 0.00% 0.01%
28. Current symptoms of TB - Do you have a fever? 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.01% 0.00% 0.00%
29. Current symptoms of TB - Night sweats? 0.01% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.03% 0.01% 0.01%
30. Current symptoms of TB - Do you have fatigue? 0.01% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.01% 0.00% 0.01%
31. Any current sexually transmitted illnesses? 0.66% 1.18% 1.07% 1.04% 0.92% 1.61% 1.25% 1.34%
32. Do you currently have crabs? 0.00% 0.00% 0.04% 0.03% 0.04% 0.05% 0.03% 0.02%
33. Do you have currently have scabies? 0.03% 0.00% 0.07% 0.06% 0.05% 0.07% 0.06% 0.08%
34. Anything else about infectious disease history? 0.86% 1.69% 0.58% 0.35% 0.47% 0.75% 0.89% 0.47%
35. Is the inmate oriented x 3 97.90% 98.16% 98.02% 98.98% 99.65% 99.60% 99.51% 99.17%
36. Normal gait? 96.50% 96.80% 96.91% 97.92% 98.70% 98.55% 98.26% 98.14%
37. Normal breathing? 97.93% 98.40% 98.38% 99.30% 99.70% 99.70% 99.41% 99.59%
38. Normal skin appearance? 93.48% 95.17% 95.15% 94.09% 96.66% 97.66% 96.28% 96.58%
39. Tremors? 0.45% 0.70% 0.81% 0.82% 0.53% 0.72% 0.83% 0.79%
40. Sweating? 0.13% 0.10% 0.18% 0.11% 0.08% 0.22% 0.15% 0.30%
41. Anxious? 1.94% 2.02% 1.95% 1.72% 1.13% 1.18% 1.73% 1.59%
42. Disheveled? 1.28% 1.76% 1.73% 1.74% 1.08% 0.69% 1.03% 0.80%
43. Lethargic? 0.42% 0.35% 0.56% 0.27% 0.30% 0.51% 0.74% 0.74%
44. Angry or agressive behavior? 0.50% 0.31% 0.52% 0.31% 0.29% 0.49% 0.69% 0.87%
45. Dilated pupils? 0.08% 0.07% 0.09% 0.06% 0.11% 0.12%
46 Presents as Cognitively challenged? 0.18% 0.16% 0.18% 0.20% 0.13% 0.29% 0.24% 0.24%
47. Presents as Confused and/or disoriented? 0.13% 0.07% 0.15% 0.14% 0.10% 0.35% 0.22% 0.39%
48. Crying? 0.94% 0.71% 0.95% 0.77% 0.66% 0.68% 1.05% 1.39%
49. Do you have health insurance? 29.96% 49.92% 50.51% 45.59% 46.19% 44.49% 47.45% 46.45%
50. Dental Screening Performed? 95.15% 94.17% 97.02% 97.96% 98.59% 97.43% 96.11% 81.47%
51. Referral to Nursing? 28.20% 32.44% 34.67% 32.22% 32.43% 31.49% 34.68% 23.13%
52. Referral to Physician? 21.30% 19.83% 21.78% 21.20% 25.41% 27.61% 31.88% 20.38%
53. Referral to Dentist? 1.35% 1.31% 2.42% 1.04% 1.08% 1.41% 1.29% 2.17%
54. Referral to Mental Health? 18.46% 29.89% 35.88% 36.93% 37.53% 36.28% 40.18% 29.94%
55. Vital Signs Taken? 89.92% 91.56% 93.40% 93.63% 94.97% 92.31% 89.38% 78.12%
Medical Screening Over Time 60

Answers to Mental Health Screening Completed in Intake
QUESTION % YES % NO
Are you currently taking medication that has not been prescribed to you? 1.2% 98.80%
Are you currently drunk or high? 4.0% 96.00%
Do you use illegal drugs? 15.4% 84.60%
Do you have drug withdrawal concerns? 6.5% 93.50%
Do you currently use alcohol? 27.1% 72.90%
Do you have alcohol withdrawal concerns? 5.6% 94.40%
Have you ever had alcohol or drug withdrawal? 8.4% 91.60%
Have you ever received treatment for substance abuse? 6.9% 93.10%
Is there anything else we need to know about your substance abuse history? 1.6% 98.40%
Are you taking medications for mental health issues? 15.7% 84.30%
Have you ever been treated for ADHD? 6.3% 93.70%
Have you ever been treated for developmental disorders? 0.3% 99.70%
Have you ever been treated for an eating disorder? 0.1% 99.90%
Have you ever been in special education? 0.8% 99.20%
Have you ever been diagnosed as bipolar? 10.1% 89.90%
Have you ever been diagnosed with schizophrenia? 4.5% 95.50%
Have you ever had a learning disability? 0.4% 99.60%
Does anyone in your family have or had a mental illness? 1.0% 99.00%
Have you ever been case managed for a mental illness? 3.4% 96.60%
Have you ever been treated in a psychiatric hospital? 8.0% 92.00%
Have you ever been self-abusive or engaged in self mutilation behavior? 3.2% 96.80%
Are you feeling homicidal now? 0.6% 99.40%
Have you ever been physically abused? 1.3% 98.70%
Have you ever had suicidal thoughts or made attempts? 7.5% 92.50%
Are you having suicial thoughts now or thinking of harming yourself now? 1.4% 98.60%
Do you have any current or past losses that you are feeling grief and depression over? 1.7% 98.30%
Has anyone in your family ever taken their own life? 0.7% 99.30%
Have you experienced a life threatening or abusive event that still bothers you today? 0.5% 99.50%
Are you currently having feelings of hopelessness or helplessness? 1.4% 98.60%
Do you have a support system in the community that you can depend on? 72.4% 27.60%
Have you ever experienced auditory,visual, olfactory, or tactile hallucinations? 0.7% 99.30%
Has inmate ever had or experienced delusional thinking? 0.3% 99.70%
TalkingPoint! Every offender brought to

jail is evaluated by both a medical and mental
health professional while still in Intake. The
answers to the mental health survey questions
they are asked are summarized above. The data
in this table is based on around 13,000 offenders
who came to jail during 2021. Mental Health
services are an ever-increasing part of inmate
management in the jail, and must be taken into
consideration at almost every significant event in
an offender's stay; from intake, to classification, to
discipline, to release. It should be noted that the
data in these screenings do rely on self-reported
information, so numbers such as those for bi-
polar diagnosis and psychiatric hospital treatment
are interesting.
Mental Health Survey Summary 61

"YES" Answers to Mental Health Screening
in Recent Years
QUESTION 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Are you currently taking medication that has not been
0.8% 0.8% 1.0% 0.9% 0.8% 1.2% 1.8% 1.2%
prescribed to you?
Are you currently drunk or high? 4.8% 4.1% 3.4% 3.0% 1.4% 1.5% 2.6% 4.0%
Do you use illegal drugs? 15.3% 17.4% 16.4% 14.1% 15.1% 10.4% 11.7% 15.4%
Do you currently use alcohol? 36.9% 33.0% 30.5% 28.4% 28.9% 30.3% 35.2% 27.1%
Have you ever had alcohol or drug withdrawal? 3.5% 6.4% 7.2% 7.4% 8.5% 9.4% 10.2% 8.4%
Received treatment for substance abuse? 8.0% 6.0% 5.3% 4.9% 6.6% 7.8% 9.1% 6.9%
Are you taking medications for mental health issues? 12.2% 18.0% 18.0% 18.6% 21.5% 18.1% 19.1% 15.7%
Have you ever been treated for ADHD? 11.1% 12.6% 14.7% 12.6% 9.4% 8.1% 8.0% 6.3%
Been treated for developmental disorders? 0.1% 0.1% 0.2% 0.2% 0.2% 0.1% 0.1% 0.3%
Have you ever been treated for an eating disorder? 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1%
Have you ever been in special education? 0.2% 0.3% 0.3% 0.2% 0.2% 0.1% 0.1% 0.8%
Have you ever been diagnosed as bipolar? 11.9% 12.8% 13.4% 13.1% 11.1% 10.9% 11.8% 10.1%
Have you ever been diagnosed with schizophrenia? 3.9% 4.2% 4.8% 4.4% 3.9% 3.8% 4.5% 4.5%
Have you ever had a learning disability? 0.3% 0.2% 0.2% 0.3% 0.2% 0.1% 0.1% 0.4%
Does anyone in your family have a mental illness? 1.2% 1.1% 1.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 1.0%
Have you ever been case managed for mental illness?
4.5% 4.6% 4.3% 4.2% 3.6% 3.4% 3.9% 3.4%
Treated in a psychiatric hospital? 8.7% 9.0% 9.2% 8.4% 7.1% 7.4% 9.3% 8.0%
Have you ever been self-abusive or engaged in self
1.3% 2.9% 3.7% 4.0% 4.6% 5.2% 6.2% 3.2%
mutilation behavior?
Are you feeling homicidal now? 0.3% 0.2% 0.3% 0.3% 0.2% 1.0% 1.0% 0.6%
Have you ever been physically abused? 1.1% 1.0% 0.8% 0.9% 1.3% 0.8% 1.4% 1.3%
Suicidal attempts or thoughts, now or ever? 6.7% 5.7% 7.4% 7.7% 6.2% 6.4% 8.6% 7.5%
Have you having suicidal thoughts now? 1.2% 1.0% 1.3% 1.3% 1.1% 1.2% 1.7% 1.4%
Do you have any current or past losses that you are
0.3% 0.4% 0.4% 0.2% 0.2% 0.2% 0.5% 1.7%
feeling grief and depression over?
Has anyone in your family taken their own life? 0.2% 0.2% 0.2% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.7%
Have you ever experienced a life threatening or
0.2% 0.2% 0.2% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.5% 0.5%
abusive event that still bothers you today?
Are you currently having feelings of hopelessness or
1.2% 0.9% 1.2% 0.7% 0.5% 1.1% 1.8% 1.4%
helplessness?
Do you have a support system in the community that
80.8% 83.4% 85.1% 86.3% 70.5% 51.0% 58.4% 72.4%
you can depend on?
Have you ever experienced auditory, visual, olfactory,
0.4% 0.3% 0.8% 0.5% 0.3% 0.5% 1.2% 0.7%
or tactical hallucinations?
Ever had or experienced delusional thinking? 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.2% 0.6% 0.3%
0.3
TalkingPoint! Every offender brought to jail is evaluated by a mental health professional while still in Intake. The
percentage of the mental health survey questions that were answered YES appear on this table.
Mental Health Summary over Time 62

Work Completed by Mental Health Staff
Month Book Ins Assessed SPMI ID'd IR ID'd DD ID'd Ref. to MH Pod In Services Psyc med
Jan 1103 390 52 24 5 18 27 unk
Feb 1031 328 46 36 3 12 23 unk
Mar 1226 351 38 50 9 13 28 unk
Apr 1056 397 48 28 7 22 32 unk
May 1017 375 43 22 1 13 23 802
Jun 1139 455 45 33 4 24 24 977
Jul 1286 536 44 39 2 23 30 800
Aug 1242 463 44 44 1 17 17 786
Sep 1191 605 47 47 1 24 27 785
Oct 1175 704 40 39 0 17 21 774
Nov 1117 625 42 46 2 12 23 700
Dec 1009 458 36 32 1 15 15 651
Totals 13592 5687 525 440 36 210 290 6275
New Admissions and Number Assessed by Mental Health Staff
1400
1200
1000
800 Admissions
600 Assessed
400
200
0
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Notifcations Completed by Mental Health Staff
1600
1400
1200
1000
800 Completed
600
400
200
0
Suicide Alerts - S1 - require weekly visit, S2 - 2 times as week and S3 - daily
1600
1400
1200
1000 S1 Alert
800 S2 Alert
600 S3 Alert
400
200
0
Mental Health 63
Inmate Needs Reported in Classification Interview
Offenders Come to Jail with a Number of Needs
QUESTION % YES % NO
1 1. HEALTH ISSUES: Does this inmate report having any unresolved medical issues which
would require you to contact medical, or does this inmate have any health problems that would 31.1% 68.9%
affect their housing?
2 2. MENTAL STABILITY: Does this inmate have mental health problems, including suicidal
ideation, that would affect their housing? 29.8% 70.2%
3 3. ALCOHOL ABUSE: Does the inmate admit to having an alcohol problem, or does the
inmate appear to have an alcohol problem in your judgement? 28.9% 71.1%
4 4. DRUG ABUSE: Does the inmate admit to a drug problem, or does the inmate appear to
have a problem with drugs in your judgement? 36.1% 63.9%
5 5. PAST TREATMENT: Does the inmate indicate past treatment for their drug or alcohol
problem? If so, record where, when, and if they are interested in continuing treatment. 28.8% 71.2%
6 6. EDUCATIONAL HISTORY: Does the inmate have a GED or a high school diploma? If not,
is the inmate interested in continuing their education in the main jail or honor camp? 80.3% 19.7%
7 7. VOCATIONAL SKILLS: Does the inmate have a marketable skill or trade that is used to
support himself and his family? (Answer "Yes" if this is true, and "No" if is the inmate has no 7.6% 92.4%
skills, limited training, or little or no employment history.)
8 8. LITERACY: Can this inmate read and write the English language? 97.2% 2.8%
 TalkingPoint! These numbers represent the percentage of inmates in population who admit these needs to
a classification officer. This information is based on the self report of the inmates during their classification interviews
this year. It is not based on a clinical assessment and the report is not verified independently. This reflects an
inmate's "admission" only. Not all inmates honestly report their needs at the classification interview. All inmates who
stay in jail longer than 3 days are given a classification interview.
YES RESPONSES TO NEEDS QUESTIONS

97.2%
80.3%
36.1%
31.1% 29.8% 28.9% 28.8%
7.6%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Needs Survey Summary 64

Inmate Needs Reported Over Recent Years
QUESTION 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Health
1. HEALTH ISSUES: Does this inmate report having any unresolved
medical issues which would require you to contact medical, or does this 17.6% 24.4% 23.3% 27.1% 30.2% 31.1%
inmate have any health problems that would affect their housing?
Mental
2. MENTAL STABILITY: Does this inmate have mental health problems,
16.4% 22.9% 20.6% 23.9% 33.5% 29.8%
including suicidal ideation, that would affect their housing?
Alcohol
3. ALCOHOL ABUSE: Does the inmate admit to having an alcohol
problem, or does the inmate appear to have an alcohol problem in your 22.7% 29.1% 29.4% 32.6% 30.8% 28.9%
judgement?
Drugs
4. DRUG ABUSE: Does the inmate admit to a drug problem, or does the
24.4% 29.1% 29.6% 31.4% 35.5% 36.1%
inmate appear to have a problem with drugs in your judgement?
Treatment
5. PAST TREATMENT: Does the inmate indicate past treatment for their
drug or alcohol problem? If so, record where, when, and if they are 28.4% 30.3% 33.1% 31.9% 30.7% 28.8%
interested in continuing treatment.
School
6. EDUCATIONAL HISTORY: Does the inmate have a GED or a high
school diploma? If not, is the inmate interested in continuing their 70.9% 71.9% 78.8% 79.6% 78.4% 80.3%
education in the jail?
Skills
7. VOCATIONAL SKILLS: Does the inmate have a marketable skill or
trade that is used to support himself and his family? (Answer "Yes" if this
25.3% 23.9% 24.7% 25.5% 15.1% 7.6%
is true, and "No" if is the inmate has no skills, limited training, or little or no
employment history.)
Literacy
8. LITERACY: Can this inmate read and write the English language? 98.1% 98.3% 97.8% 98.4% 97.9% 97.2%
Yes Responses to Needs Questions from Each Year

2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
2020 witnessed a significant

increase in self-reported mental
health issues, and 2021
continued the significant drop in The % of inmates with
reported vocational skill from issues related to drugs
Health Mental Alcohol Drugs Treatment School Skills Literacy
Inmate needs reported in prior years 65

Prison Rape Elimination Act (PREA)
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
IPREA - PREA Investigations 44 26 35 37 28 21
PREA-U 34 22 33 34 26 19
Unsubstantiated 15 10 7 11 10 5
Inmate on Inmate 14 9 9 10 10 5
Staff on Inmate 1 1 0 1 0 0
Unfounded 19 12 26 23 16 14
Unknown on Inmate 1 1 0 1 0 0
PREA Substantiated 6 3 1 1 1 1
TOA - Turned Over to Other Agency 3 1 1 2 1 2
Staff on Inmate (may be other agency) 2 1 1 1 0 1
Criminal Charges 1 1 0 0 1 1
Criminal Charges Denied 5 1 2 2 0 0
Staff Misconduct Reported

Investigated 6 3 4 4 1 4
Unfounded 4 2 4 3 1 3
Substantiated 1 0 0 0 0 0
Other 0 0 0 0 0 1
Staff Sexual Harassment
Inmate on Inmate Non-consensual Acts
TOA 0 0 0 2 1 0
Inmate Abusive Sexual Contacts
Investigated 9 8 4
Unfounded 6 3 2
Unsubstantiated 3 4 1
Substantiated 0 1 1
Inmate on Inmate Sexual Harassment
PREA Investigations
60
40
20
0
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
PREA 1 66
Prison Rape Elimination Act
Sexual Abuse Incident Review
Closing
In 2012, the jail implemented the Sexual Abuse Incident Review system per PREA
standard 115.86. Under this standard, the Division must conduct a sexual abuse
incident review at the conclusion of every sexual abuse investigation, to include
when the allegation has not been substantiated, unless the allegation has been
determined to be unfounded. Such review will ordinarily occur within 30 days of the
conclusion of the investigation. The review team will include upper-level
management officials, with input from line supervisors, investigators, and medical or
mental health practitioners. The jail administration will implement any
recommendations for improvement, or it will document its reasons for not doing so.
Review Criteria:
1. Consider whether the allegation or investigation indicates a need to

change policy or practices to better prevent, detect, or respond to
sexual abuse
2. Consider whether the alleged incident was motivated by race; ethnicity;
gender identity; lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, or intersex
identification, status, or perceived status; or gang affiliation; or was
motivated or otherwise caused by other group dynamics in the facility.
3. Examine the area in the facility where the allegation occurred to assess
whether physical barriers in the area may enable abuse.
4. Assess the adequacy of staffing levels in on all shifts in that area.
5. Assess whether monitoring technology should be deployed or
augmented to supplement supervision by staff.
6. Prepare a report of its findings, add any recommendations for
improvement, and submit such report to the facility head and PREA
Coordinator.
In all of the allegations that were reviewed, it was clear that staff have
implemented training that has been occurring since PREA requirements. All
investigations were done in a timely manner and all complaints were addressed
immediately upon their receipt. Continued training for all staff has focused on PREA
requirements, staff obligations for reporting and victim care, and preservation and
protection of the scene until the appropriate steps can be taken to collect any
evidence. Additionally, a new reporting system (jail management system) is being
implemented to better track and report incidents.
A Special Thanks to the KCCF PREA Coordinator Lt. Scott Nibbelink, who provided
the information on the previous page.
PREA 2 67

2021 Annual Statistical Report

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

2021 Annual Statistical Report

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

2021 Annual Statistical Report

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

March 2022

Sergeant Aaron Kleinheksel

Average Daily Populations and Facility Totals

Average Length of Stay

Billing, Collections, Fees

Booking or Admissions – Yearly or Monthly Totals and Averages

Medical and Mental Health Related Information

Incidents and Rule Violations

Inmate Profiles and General Demographic Information

Release Related Information

Suicide Attempt and Precaution Related Information

Support Provided to Law Enforcement

2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Race 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

2021 2014 through 2021

2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

# of children 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Inmate Profile - Booking (pt 1) 1

# of charges 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

2021 2014 through 2021

2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Occupation 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

2021 2014 through 2021

Recidivism 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

2021 2014 through 2021

2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Inmate Profile - Booking (pt 2) 2

Inmate Profile - Booking (pt 3) 3

2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Race 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

2021 2014 through 2021

2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

# of children 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Male Profile - Booking (pt 1) 4

# of charges 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

2021 2014 through 2021

2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Occupation 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

2021 2014 through 2021

2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Recidivism 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

2021 2014 through 2021

2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Male Profile - Booking (pt 2) 5

Male Inmate Marital Status 20 Year Trend

Single Married Divorced

2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Race 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

2021 2014 through 2021

2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

# of children 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

2021 2014 through 2021

Female Profile - Booking (pt 1) 7

# of charges 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

2021 2014 through 2021

2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Occupation 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

2021 2014 through 2021

2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021