Name Professor Class Date
Name Professor Class Date
Name Professor Class Date
Professor
Class
Date
Immigration has been an issue of contention in the United States and has subsequently
sparked a lot of political debate for a number of years with policymakers sharing their economic,
humanitarian and security takes. Such a contentious issue has proved impossible to reform such
that congress often delegates major policy decision to the judicial and executive branches of the
government thus pouring gasoline into the fire. Different presidents have had different stances on
immigration and have implemented policies that match their stands. Americans hold different
views on immigration with most Americans believing immigration to be good and see the value
of the immigrant population on the economy. Despite the ongoing challenges of immigration
populations face as ethnic minorities the benefits of having an immigrant population far
The long standing belief that immigrant modest lifestyle could be detrimental to the
economy is quite untrue. In the contrary, immigrants in the US contribute to the economy
significantly because they constitute almost a third of the American workforce and work at
higher rates. Immigrants are geographically mobile and this is important for local economies
who often suffer worker shortages; immigrants provide much needed labor force that in absence
could easily weaken the economy. A lot of immigrants work with elderlies, supporting and
taking care of the aging population vastly increases amount of workers in comparison to the
retired workers who boost the Social Security and other medical trust funds (Sherman et al.,
2019).
According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, in 2018 foreigners comprised of 65.7%
of the labor force while native born Americans constituted 62.3% of the labor force. More of the
foreign population was employed than the native born. Immigrants are essential to the economy
because they hold jobs that are integral in their communities and to the economy. Those with no
college degree are found in all sectors of the economy and form a sizable portion of industries
like accommodation, construction, food manufacturing, fishing and farming. These industries
could run potential losses if they could no longer hire workers who permanently reside in the US.
While those non degree holders make up very little of the workforce population in some
industries they are heavily reflected in pertinent industries such as fishing, farming and forestry
(STATISTICS, U. B. O. L. (2018).
Immigrants fill sizeable roles in the US economy; recent findings show that the
immigrant population contribution to the economy can often go undetected due to the workers
mobility. Immigrants are often more responsive to calls about worker shortage than native burns
are. this ability to move and provide much needed labor fills gaps that native born would not
have filled and ensures productivity that would boosts the economy all while paying lower
wages. It would therefore be accurate to deduce that immigration significantly improves labor
market efficiency. This mobility inadvertently helps the housing market because as native
population growth rate reduces while the immigrant population continuously increases they form
a majority share of the housing. Since most immigrants move to America in search of a better
life, most are often poor and work in very low paying jobs and need the support of programs like
Medicaid and SNAP to survive. This is true for other native born American who stand to benefit
from these programs. Immigrants who are on these programs are employed in low paying jobs or
married to a person working these low paying jobs. Those who receive these benefits are much
more likely to be employed which is a reflection of the temporary nature of these beneficial
programs participation and how this overlaps with the benefits and employment rate year in year
Aging Population
Research shows that the national birth rate has steadily been decreasing in the last few
years. Decrease birth rate can be terrible for the labor force due to decreased population. This
coupled with reduced demand for housing and other industries means a less ideal economy.
Immigrants fill this much needed gaps. Immigrant play a crucial role in taking care of older
generations that have left the work force this bridging the gap left by retired workers. Immigrants
help balance the ratio of the young and mature in the labor force and since most of the young
people are college graduates not interested in low skilled jobs immigrants can successfully fill in
the gaps left. As the 2017 NAS report notes, “The vast majority of current and future net
workforce growth — which, at less than 1 percent annually, is very slow by historical standards
will be accounted for by immigrants and their U.S.-born descendants.” This inadvertently
improves the Social Security Trust Fund due to the increased immigrant population using the
fund. All other programs created to cushion the poor stand to benefit from use by employed
Upward Mobility
The United States provides good grounds for self-improvement and this is evident in
upward social movement of children of immigrants. Denying entry of immigrants into the US
does not account fully for the immense contributions of immigrant children to long term
economy of the United States. Immigrant children, according to most research, are more
educated and have higher income in better paying jobs and occupations than their parents. There
is a significant economic gap between immigrant parents and their children which is a reflection
of good economic status. Children of immigrants perform better at school graduate high school
and even join some of the more prestigious colleges. Education levels is a true measure of social
mobility and immigrant parents who did not attain a high school education are able to educate
Scholarship and family centered research has changed in the last few years to include
family environment, community contexts and individual attitudes to explain to describe the
impact of immigration the function and formation of immigrant families. The United States
primarily considers the nuclear family as founded in the national state therefore family studies
tend to focus their research on the interactions within families without engaging families across
the border. This results in the loss of monumental practices and cultures of transnational families
living in different countries. However, transnational families do not believe that nuclear families
are the core unit of the family and look forward to being reunited with their families (Mazzucato,
Immigration is one of the leading causes of centering nuclear families due children
growing up without a wider family circle. Immigration has a direct impact on family structures,
households are fractured and families and split up when people immigrate to other geographical
areas. With immigration, kids at very young ages leave their houses and live in different houses
with different families. Most immigrant families who bring their kids along cannot take care of
them while working and are forced to leave them with the grandparents. Others have to leave
their children in their native countries which mean most immigrant children grow up without
their parents. We therefore cannot ignore the negative impact that immigration on the family
Immigration choices are often grounded in a desire to meet the family’s needs and in the
past decade research has shed light on economic effects of immigration without devoting time to
the effects immigration on individual members in the families. This gap in research has resulted
populations and their families. Transnational families are common in the United States due to the
strict immigration policies that often make it impossible for families to immigrate together in
Immigration tends to have a negative impact on natural resource allocation in the migrant
country. Most immigrant workers move to rural areas in the US since they are focused on low
skilled work such as farming and fishing which is concentrated in rural areas. The early 1980s
and 1990s was characterized by an increase in population growth which has had immense effects
on the natural resources. This prompts research to critically examine the relationship between
population growth and increase and the consequences on the management of natural resources
The summer of 2000 was marked by increased number of wildfires in West Coast;
private lands nearing Idaho and Montana were severely ravaged by extensive fires. Drought, fuel
accumulation and low moisture content played a significant role in creating environments prone
to wildfires. An increased fire outbreak in the west is symptomatic of the social changes that
have occurred due to increased immigrant populations working in the vast fields and vineyards.
Fires are not the only effect of increased population; natural resources are increasingly depleted
otherwise public lands are all effects of an increased population (McCool and Kruger. 2003).
Immigration has been known to affect the political institutions due to the toggle in supply
and demand. Immigrant make choices based on the climate of their country and their movement
is often an attempt at escaping political instability and corrupt regimes. This prompts home
countries to create policies that offer better institutions for immigrants. One can draw from the
interactions between democracy and immigration policies. While most immigrants are
uneducated and therefore are unlikely to spark political debate when oppressed they are often
incentivized to seek education thus increase their wages. Increased education prospects and
chances of higher wages can often mitigate the adverse effects that low skilled immigrant
workers could have on the political and economic institutions (Lodigiani, 2016).
Most immigrants form part of the ethnic minority since they immigrate and settle in
similar areas; they predominantly represent ethnic minorities and their specific needs. This
presupposes the notion that ethnic minorities are quite vocal in their opposition of governments
thus they creating a less pluralistic society. Less pluralistic societies tend to have most stable
governments and a thriving democracy. This has been coined as the “exit voice” models where
political decisions instituted allow people to walk away from discriminatory or autocratic
for a number of years. However public discourse and research fails to adequately correlate
increase in crime with the increase in immigrant populations. The undocumented population has
tripled in recent years and this has sparked controversial and heated debates around criminality
of these illegal aliens. This inadvertently created changes in policies and immigration reforms
reactionary to the crimes that many would associate with illegal aliens. This was evident in the
Supreme court decision to invalidate California as sanctuary due inability to arrest illegal aliens
who commit crimes and go back to their communities (Mariani, and Mercier 2021).
Law enforcement has primarily been dealing with the criminal concerns of illegal
immigration so much so that the government in recent years has spent millions more on
immigration and criminal law enforcement than on any other criminal laws. These practices and
policies have been shortsighted in their review of criminality among the undocumented. Most
research shows that illegal immigrants are far less likely to commit crimes than their native
counterparts. To fully understand the relationship between criminality and illegal immigration
one has to look at it from various angles. Is the criminality between native born similar to that of
illegal immigrants? Are illegal immigrants more prone to commit crimes more than their native
peers? Is there specific crime that illegal immigrants commit more? (Mariani, and Mercier 2021).
Despite evidence that contradicts the conflation between criminality and illegal
immigration; illegal aliens are still more likely to be arrested for crimes they did not commit.
How immigrants are portrayed in the media has a significant impact on the general outlook and
attitude that native population has. Numerous portrayals of immigrants as the enemy and
negative story lines around immigrants have significantly contributed to the policy changes that
criminalize immigration. Latinos are often depicted as threatening and unwilling to assimilate
into the US. Images of immigrants in detention facilities or in the custody of immigrant officials
further the notion that immigrants are inherently criminal. This myth of increased criminality
among the immigrant population greatly impeded social acceptance into the American fabric
Migration is responsible for the rich and diverse cultures, races and ethnicities in the
developed world. Those who immigrate often cite stress due to loss of religious norms, cultural
practices and social supports while adjusting to new environments with new cultures that tend to
change self-perception and identity. Mental illnesses have increased in ethnic minorities and
most mental health specialist report that the needs of this vulnerable population ought to be met.
The immigrant population is made up of diverse cultures which can make it quite difficult for
mental health practitioners to fully understand the cultural experience of immigrants and
Culture is crucial while studying how illnesses present in the different cultures because it
has a profound effect on the diagnosis and treatment of immigrant populations due to the vast
differences in religious, linguistic and social. Mental illnesses present differently in the various
cultural ethnicities thus illustrating the interplay between psychological, biological and social
factors that affect the well-being of an individual. Healthcare provision among different
communities is hinged on social, political and economic factors well outside the group’s control.
Diagnostic tools and treatment plan sought to account for cultural differences to be effective
Conclusion
The immigrant population is steadily increasing and a critical look at their benefits to the
environment should prompt policy makers to create laws that are favorable to them. Despite the
increased population and the strain on the natural resources, immigrants bridge a very important
gap in the labor force. Their disadvantages do not match up to the added advantages of
multicultural society is a society primed for a thriving democracy and society bent upon
inclusion.
REFERENCES
Bhugra, D., & Becker, M. A. (2005). Migration, cultural bereavement and cultural
Farris, E., & Mohamed, H. S. (2018). The News Media Usually Show Immigrants as Dangerous
Light, M. T., He, J., & Robey, J. P. (2020). Comparing crime rates between undocumented
Mariani, F., & Mercier, M. (2021). Immigration and crime: The role of self-selection and
Mazzucato, V., & Schans, D. (2011). Transnational Families and the Well-Being of Children:
704–712. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2011.00840.x
McCool Stephen, F., & Kruger Linda, E. (2003). Human Migration and Natural Resources:
Research Station.
[Accessed 17/08/2020].