Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Case 2:19-cv-00365-MHT-JTA Document 193 Filed 06/24/22 Page 1 of 2

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

YASHICA ROBINSON, M.D., )


et al., on behalf of )
themselves, their )
patients, physicians, )
clinic administrators, )
and staff, )
)
Plaintiffs, )
) CIVIL ACTION NO.
v. ) 2:19cv365-MHT
) (WO)
STEVEN MARSHALL, in his )
official capacity as )
Alabama Attorney General, )
et al., )
)
Defendants. )

ORDER

In light of the decision of the Supreme Court in

Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, ___

S. Ct. ___, 2022 WL 2276808 (June 24, 2022), overruling

Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), and Planned

Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833

(1992), and based on the representations made on the

record today by counsel for the plaintiffs that, as a

result of the Court’s decision in Jackson Women’s

Health Organization, the legal underpinning for the


Case 2:19-cv-00365-MHT-JTA Document 193 Filed 06/24/22 Page 2 of 2

October 29, 2019, preliminary injunction (Doc. 69),

Robinson v. Marshall, 415 F. Supp. 3d 1053 (M.D. Ala.

2019), no longer exists, it is ORDERED as follows:

(1) The defendants’ emergency motion to dissolve

the preliminary injunction (Doc. 190), which is

unopposed, is granted; and

(2) The October 29, 2019, preliminary injunction

(Doc. 69) is dissolved.

DONE, this the 24th day of June, 2022.

/s/ Myron H. Thompson


UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

You might also like