RBQ Integrated Activities
RBQ Integrated Activities
Abstract
This study aims to determine the effectiveness of integrated activities to reduction repetitive
behavior in children with autism. The participants were students, age ranged from 4 – 10 years old, who
were clinically diagnosed as autism and enrolled at Special Education Center, Loei Province. Research
was single subject design with AB design. The participants were selected by purposive sampling. Over
the course of 13 weeks of the study, integrated activities were designed for individual program for
reduction repetitive behaviors that were negative effect to learning. These behaviors include head
butting, hand flapping, finger knocking, finger banding, body shaking and hand gesturing.
The behaviors in academic class were video recorded for further analysis where the frequency of the
behaviors can be recorded at 1st (A), 5th (B5), 9th (B9), and 13rd (B13) Week. Video recordings were
individually replayed by 2 evaluators (inter-observer reliability = 98.3%), the main researcher and
research assistant who are teaching special educators and counted number of repetitive behaviors.
Data were consensused and analyzed by using descriptive analysis for general information and The
Wilcoxon Signed- Rank Test for analysis median difference among number of repetitive behaviors at
A1, B5, B9, and B13. The result revealed that integration activities significantly decreased repetitive
behaviors for children with autism between the 1st (A) and 13rd (B13) week (Median difference = -32.5,
95% confidence interval = 24.09-38.78).
McIntyre, & Carnett, 2019) Repetitive behavior is not related to brain function. Repetitive
is widely known to be one of three core and behaviors can be the result of sensory
defining features of autism. Of specific interest integration or the brain’s inability to process or
here, the repetitive behavior domain involves manage sensory stimuli from themselves and
compulsive behaviors, unusual attachments to the environment (Saenthaweesuk et al., 2011).
objects, rigid adherence to routines or rituals, There are many interventions for treatment of
and repetitive motor mannerisms such as repetitive behaviors such as sensory integration
stereotypies and self-stimulatory behaviors therapy (SIT), differential reinforcement of
(Insel, O’Brien, & Leckman, 1999). Repetitive, incompatible behavior (DRI), differential
apparently purposeless behavior “stereotypy” or reinforcement of other or zero rates of behavior
“perseveration,” and such behaviors are actually (DRO), differential reinforcement of variable
described as symptoms of autism in the DSM-5 behavior (DRV), environmental enrichment,
(the official diagnostic manual) (Lai, Lombardo, functional communication training (FCT),
Chakrabarti, & Baron-Cohen, 2013; Mattila non-contingent or time based schedules of
et al., 2011). Stereotyped or repetitive motor reinforcement (NCR), overcorrection, physical
movements, use of objects, or speech. exercise, response blocking, response cost,
Hyper-reactivity or hypo reactivity to sensory response interruption and redirection (RIRD)
input or unusual interest in sensory aspects of (Raulston et al., 2019). A survey of behavioral
the environment. Repetitive behaviors in autism practices revealed that reinforcement-based
can vary radically from person to person. No one practices, punishment-based practices, and
really knows what causes perseveration in people a group of commonly packaged antecedent
with autism, though there are a variety of and consequence-based package components
theories. However, a recent study found that are the common interventions for decreasing
restricted and repetitive behaviors contributing repetitive behaviors in autism (Raulston et al.,
to a diagnosis of ASD at age 2 years are 2019). Sensory integration therapy (SIT) is a
associated with structural properties of commonly used treatment (Mandell, Novak, &
callosal and cerebellar white matter pathways Levyd, 2005). For Frequency of treatments, 33%
measured during infancy and toddlerhood. We used interventions sometimes (approximately
further identified that repetitive behaviors and 25–50% of cases) or often (more than
unusual sensory response patterns co-occur approximately 50% of cases). Most of
and share common brain-behavior relationships. practitioners reported SIT as effective, 62 %
These results were strikingly specific given the (Raulston et al., 2019). Previous studies used
absence of association between targeted duration and frequency of intervention varied
pathways and social deficits (Wolff et al., 2017) from 3 to 90 minutes, 2- 5 sessions a week
Lacking of social interaction, language for 5-12 weeks, depended on designing. For
and communication, and learning limitation, TEACCH (Treatment and Education of Autistic
especially repetitive behaviors such as rocking, and Relate Communication Handicapped
head shaking or banging, flicking, clapping, hand Children) in autism, designing integrated
biting, and tiptoeing that are learning obstacles activities to increase or decrease the perception
for children and withdraw their attention from of feelings in correspondence with specific
the surroundings. It also interrupts them from problems in each systematic classroom
maintaining interactions with other people, management (Siriratrekha, 2017) by adopting
as well as continuing with their daily routines. TEACCH principles can be adapted for process
Moreover, it affects their sensory and learning of creating a balance in recognition processing,
development. Children who experience these decrease repetitive behaviors, and promote
behaviors tend to be underdeveloped in perceptual learning (Sudalak, 2012). TEACCH is a method
cognitive abilities, as their physical coordination called “Structured Teaching, those strengths
Phase A (Baseline)
Week 1 Observing repetitive behaviors in academic skills
classes
(Mon – Fri, 10.30-11.30 am.)
Table 3 displayed median and mean frequency of repetitive behaviors and it clearly appeared
that the occurrence of the behaviors was less frequent after implementation of integrated activities.
appeared that the occurrence of the behaviors was less frequent after implementation of integrated
activities.
A: week 1, B5: week 5, B9: week 9, and B13: week 13, *p<0.05, **95% CI = 95% confidence interval