WWF Idh Toolkit Final

Attracting
Private Investments
for Sustainable
Landscapes:
A Guide
DECEMBER 2021
Green investors and NGOs have shared
interests in landscape finance, but often
struggle to work together. This guide aims
to inspire and enable people with an NGO
background to step up as project organizers
that can create and act on opportunities that
attract private investments in support of
sustainable landscapes.
Nienke Stam,
IDH Program Director Landscape Finance
Aaron Vermeulen,
WWF Director Green Finance Unit
This guide has been developed by
coverphoto © pat whelen

With support from
© paul vincent
Glossary
Asset in accounting, anything of value that a person or firm buys. Greenfield when a company builds its own, brand-new facilities from the ground up.
investment
an asset or project that is commercially viable, meaning that it is projected
Bankable to generate sufficient cash flows against acceptable risks to secure debt a contract by a third party (guarantor) to back the debt of a second party
Guarantee
obligations or to raise equity investment. (creditor) to ensure that the creditor can pay off its debt to the investor(s).
the strategic use of development finance or philanthropic/non-commercial investors that target financial returns that range from below-market
Blended finance
funds to mobilize private capital flows to emerging and frontier markets. Impact (concessionary returns) to risk-adjusted market rate. Impact investors invest
investors with an underlying purpose to realize a desired social or environmental
Brownfield when a company purchases or leases an existing facility.
change. In this publication, also referred to as “investors”.
investment
the stage at the beginning of an investment process when the potential
Commercial an investment that has the capacity to generate a risk-adjusted market rate Impact
impact is identified, and plans are made to achieve it, by developing a
investment of return, and therefore presents no need for concessional funds or grants. planning
theory of change.
cash and cash equivalents being transferred into and out of a business.
the cost of money provided by a lender, usually expressed as an annual
Positive net-cash flow enables a company to settle debts, reinvest in its Interest
Cash flow percentage of the outstanding principal amount.
business and redistribute money to shareholders. Negative net-cash flow
means that more money is streaming out of the company than coming in. an asset in which an investment can be made of which the risk-return ratio
Investable
is acceptable to debt and equity investors.
Commercial an investment that has the capacity to generate a risk-adjusted market rate
investment of return, and therefore presents no need for concessional funds or grants. the possibility for an investor to invest in a project or company needing
Investment
capital for tangible or intangible assets, which can generate future income
Concessionary subsidy or capital provided by investors who accept a below-market rate of opportunity
for the project or company.
capital return to achieve more impact.
a financial metric used to estimate how profitable potential investments are.
Deal an agreement entered into by two or more parties to do business.
The IRR is calculated based on the future cash flows that an investment will
Internal rate
the number of investment opportunities available at a given time to a generate. In general, the higher a project’s IRR, the more desirable it is to
Deal flow of return (IRR)
particular company or investor, or within a particular region or market sector. invest in. External factors, such as cost of capital or inflation, are left out of
the process through which a potential buyer or investor carries out in-depth the calculation.
analysis of a target company. Initiated only after a clear and serious interest a territory or sphere of activity under a common legal authority, such as a
Due diligence Jurisdiction
has been demonstrated (due to the amount of work involved), due diligence nation, province, state, county, etc.
must be completed before the transaction takes place.
Landscape social, economic and environmental challenges a landscape faces, such as
earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) is challenge an increase in erosion due to deforestation or low smallholder incomes.
EBITDA a measure of a company’s overall financial performance and is used as an
a holistic approach toward natural capital investments for the benefit
alternative to net income in some circumstances. Landscape
of developing sustainable landscapes, in which all stakeholders are in
finance
the stage during which the financing documents are signed, after the prior agreement and investments are interlinked and strengthen each other.
Financial close
conditions for the availability of financing have been fulfilled.
Landscape multiple landscape finance projects.
an instrument, provision or agreement that is used first if a business finance portfolio
encounters loss and cannot repay its debts. While there are various
an investment opportunity in companies or projects in a landscape that
First loss cover methods, in this sector the most used is when a percentage of the loan Landscape
have (the potential for) a bankable business case, and which contribute
amount is provided to a reserve account (e.g. 10% or 20% of the loan finance
to sustainability of the wider landscape (e.g. protection and restoration of
amount), which can be drawn on to cover first losses. project
natural resources, sustainable production, and improved livelihoods).
a financial resource that does not have to be paid back. Typically, a grant is
a program or activity that is beneficial for the landscape but does not
Grant provided to facilitate a purpose or promote performance. In some cases, a Landscape
necessarily have a business model to attract private investment, such as an
grant can also be repaid if it successfully catalyzes a commercial activity. project
educational program on regenerative agriculture.
Attracting Investments for

4 Sustainable Landscapes: 5
A Guide
a broad selection of potential investment opportunities that generally meet a limited selection of investment opportunities, often selected from a longer
an investor’s requirements. Typically, an investor conducts a preliminary list of potential opportunities, that best meet the requirements of an inves-
Shortlist
Longlist screening of a longlist to identify and shortlist those opportunities that are tor. The shortlist allows an investor to examine a smaller number of invest-
most likely to meet their requirements. Shortlisted projects can then be ment opportunities in more detail when selecting an investment.
assessed in more detail.
the activity of seeking and identifying projects that have a fit with the land-
Sourcing
a hybrid of debt and equity financing that typically gives the lender the right scape strategy.
Mezzanine
to a share in the profits or to convert to an equity interest in the company in
finance a decision-point or moment, usually between major steps in the develop-
case of default.
Stage gate ment and preparation of an investment opportunity, during which it is decid-
the financial, physical and human resources, skills, experience and abilities ed whether or not to continue with the investment.
Organizational
of a company or organization to undertake a specific project, function or
capacity here used broadly as “all affected stakeholders” in a landscape, including
initiative.
Stakeholders end-beneficiaries, shareholders, staff, communities, vulnerable and margin-
Philanthropic capital from private sources invested as grants or at below-market rates of alized groups, etc.
capital return.
assistance provided by local or international specialists. It can take the form
the actual amount lent to a project or company, excluding any interest to be of sharing information and expertise, instruction, skills training, transmission
Principal
paid. of working knowledge and consulting services, and may also involve the
Technical transfer of technical data. In the context of investments, it is typically refer-
capital from private sources that aims to generate risk-adjusted market rates
Private capital assistance (TA) ring to advisory, assistance or training that is provided to (potential) invest-
of return.
ment projects, to improve technical quality, and strengthen environmental
Project a person or entity who sets up or owns a business or project, taking on fi- and social impacts, so that the investment project meets funds’ investment
developer nancial risks with the aim of making profit. criteria and can achieve positive impact.
Project a person or entity responsible for organizing, coordinating, and overseeing a grants-based facility managed by an individual organization to provide
organizer the development of a landscape finance project. Technical technical assistance to (potential) investees with positive development im-
sources of capital provided by the public sector (governments), which is Assistance pact. A TAF can operate independently from impact investors, as a linked
Public capital often invested in a concessionary manner to catalyze or realize broader Facility (TAF) facility to an impact investment fund, or integrated into an impact invest-
public benefits. ment fund.
Public-private a contractual arrangement between two or more public and private parties, Tenor the length of time remaining before a financial contract expires.
partnership typically of a long-term nature and aimed at delivering public goods or ser- the amount of money to be invested in an investment opportunity by a sin-
Ticket size
(PPP) vices. gle investor (i.e. the size of their contribution or participation).
Risk-adjusted the return an investment should generate considering its risk, based on the Transaction the expense of carrying out transactions, such as due diligence, legal ex-
market rate of risk-return profile of the market. costs penses, tax advice, travel costs, etc.
return
a warning or indicator, suggesting that there is a potential problem or threat

Red flag regarding a business – for example, affecting its stock, financial statements
or other operations.
a loan (also called junior debt/loan) that has a lower priority than senior
loans. In the case of foreclosure or bankruptcy, the senior debt will be paid
Subordinated
down first before the subordinated debt. However, subordinated loans will
loan
still be repaid before shareholders, sitting between senior debt and share-
holders.
a loan to a project or company that holds legal claim to the borrower’s

assets above all other debt obligations and shareholders. In the event of
Senior loan bankruptcy or foreclosure, it will be the first loan to be repaid before any
other creditors, preferred stockholders, or common stockholders receive
repayment.

A Guide
Contents
GLOSSARY 4
STAGE 1 STAGE 3
HOW TO USE THIS GUIDE 10
Scanning the landscape for 24 Developing the business model, 64
What is the aim of this guide? 11 investment needs and structure, potential impacts and
Who is it for? 11
opportunities financing strategy
When and where to start with this toolkit? 11 Objective of stage 1 25 Objective of stage 3 65
Quick-start guide 12 Project origination based on 26 3.1 De-risking landscape finance 66

a landscape strategy projects with project-specific
How is the information presented? 14
enablers
1.1 Review landscape needs and 27
challenges 3.2 Financial projections and 71
investment plan
CONTEXT 15 1.2 Review key stakeholders 28
3.3 Impact planning 75
1.3 Formulate solutions: landscape 32
What to consider before getting started 16
finance project ideas 3.4 Business and impact risks 79
Investors and project types 19
1.4 Assess risks and possible red flags 34
Project origination based on the market 36
PROCESS FOR LANDSCAPE FINANCE PROJECTS: 20

HOW IS THIS GUIDE STRUCTURED?
Introducing the four stages 21

STAGE 2 APPENDIX I
Parties involved 22
STAGE 4 Developing a theory of change 100
Formulating specific investment 40 Structuring the deal and 86

projects and mobilizing the APPENDIX II
engaging investment managers
Assessing external resources required 106
right stakeholders
Objective of stage 4 87 APPENDIX III

Objective of stage 2 41 Outsourcing origination to
4.1 Investment structuring and
Financial Advisory Services (FAS) 108
2.1 Identify entry points of the 42 term sheet 89
landscape finance project
4.2 Dynamics of deal structuring
2.2 Develop high-level business 52 and negotiations 94
model
4.3 Identification of alternative
2.3 Ensure that bankability investors if needed 96
requirements can be met 56
4.4 Bringing landscape finance
2.4 Check investor interest 62 projects to financial close 99
How to use this guide
What is the aim of this guide? Who is it for?
This guide aims to provide project organizers with a clear approach and guidance on how to This toolkit has been developed for project organizers (for example, in-country teams from
identify landscape finance projects, and how to support project developers in making land- organizations such as IDH, WWF and their partners). It aims to provide guidance in identifying
scape finance projects investment-ready. landscape finance projects and supporting project developers to attract investments. In this
process, the project developer carries the responsibility for driving the entire development pro-
More specifically, the toolkit helps you: cess, with support from the project organizer.
• Identify and conceptualize landscape finance projects with the potential to be commer-
cially financed
• Develop a project business model, structure, impacts and financing strategy When and where to start with this toolkit?
• Identify financing needs and suitable investors
• Structure landscape finance projects in alignment with investor requirements In using this toolkit, it is assumed that the following elements are already in place:
• Stop landscape finance projects at an early stage if they are unlikely to be successful or
Landscape strategy: a landscape strategy has been developed and adopted by key stakehold-
meet investor requirements at later stages, to avoid wasting scarce time and resources.
ers, or is generally recognized as a suitable strategy for improving the landscape.
Using this toolkit should result in bankable landscape finance projects that are designed to meet List of indicative investors in landscape: a set of (local or international) investors who could
the expectations and requirements of fund managers, banks and other commercial investors. potentially invest in landscape finance projects consistent with the landscape strategy. A brief
While this toolkit has been developed by IDH and WWF, its general purpose is to support other introduction to identifying investors in landscape finance is provided on page 12.
conservation and development organizations involved in landscape finance.
All users of this toolkit are recommended to start with the introduction, as it provides a useful
overview of the overall process, as well as some key overarching considerations when identify-
ing, incubating and designing an investable landscape finance project.
ADDITIONAL RESOURCES ADDITIONAL RESOURCES
ADDITIONAL RESOURCES
For building a landscape strategy For finding suitable investors
• The Little Sustainable Landscapes Book • ISF Advisors (sfadvisors.org/fund-database/) manages a useful free database for
identifying investors.
• Public-Private-Civic Partnerships for Sustainable Landscapes:
a practical guide for conveners • The Global Climate Finance Architecture
• Public-Private-Partnership Landscape Compact Guidance: a step-by-step guide • Convergence Blended Finance (convergence.finance) also manages a useful paid
for local stakeholders willing to initiate a compact (i.e. landscape-based database of previously financed investment deals.
multi-stakeholder agreement with shared targets) and/or a landscape initiative
under the SourceUp platform

A Guide
OUTPUT GO TO SECTION STAGE CHECKLIST
STAGE 1 Landscape strategy, including identification of bottlenecks

for sustainability and general investment needs 1.1
+
Scanning the OUTPUT GO TO1.2SECTION STAGE
Landscape finance project CHECKLIST
ideas: What are the relevant landscape
Detailed (potential) value chain overview
Quick-start guide
landscape for finance project ideas are that fit within the landscape strategy?
investment needs
Brief description per landscape finance project idea: Which
STAGE 1
and opportunities
Landscape
List strategy,
of possible including
investable identification
project ideas basedofon
bottlenecks
landscape strategy 1.3 landscape issues does it solve (or which investment gap does it
for sustainability and general investment needs 1.1 address)? Who are the stakeholders involved? What is the business
You may not have the time, nor the need, to + model?
read the entirety of this document. The four Scanning the Table with risks, mitigating actions and acceptance level 1.4
1.2 Landscape finance project ideas: What are the relevant landscape
landscape for Detailed (potential) value chain overview finance project ideas are that fit within the landscape strategy?
stages introduced in the next section are bro-
investment needs
ken down into smaller steps, each described Brief description per landscape finance project idea: Which
and opportunities
by an action and an output. The figure below List of possible investable project ideas based on landscape strategy 1.3 landscape issues does it solve (or which investment gap does it
presents an overview of all outputs of this tool- address)? Who are the stakeholders involved? What is the business
Stakeholders: Have the stakeholders in the landscape – who are
model?
kit, and allows you to quickly identify the best STAGE 2 High-level pitch of landscape finance project
Table with risks, mitigating actions and acceptance level 1.4
directly impacted by the project – been identified and consulted?
place for you to start. 2.1 Engaged project developer(s): Are the project developers committed
Formulating Identified project developer and/or financing entry point to developing investment opportunities with a profitable business
specific investment model that has potential to solve the landscape issue(s)?
projects and High-level business model: What does the business model look like?
mobilizing the right High-level business model 2.2 Stakeholders: Have the stakeholders in the landscape – who are
Has a preliminary revenue model been identified?
STAGE 2
stakeholders High-level pitch of landscape finance project directly impacted by the project – been identified and consulted?
Investor interest: Were the first calls with investors held, and have
Assessed bankability against first set of criteria 2.1
2.3 Engaged project developer(s): Are the project developers committed
they expressed an interest?
Formulating Identified project developer and/or financing entry point to developing investment opportunities with a profitable business
specific investment Alignment
model thatwith public policies:
has potential to solveDoes the project
the landscape contribute to or
issue(s)?
projects and (Successfully) gauged investor interest 2.4 foster the implementation of public policies that are already in place?
High-level business model: What does the business model look like?
mobilizing the right High-level business model 2.2 Are there any public policies that may hinder project implementation?
Has a preliminary revenue model been identified?
stakeholders
Investor interest: Were the first calls with investors held, and have
Assessed bankability against first set of criteria 2.3 they expressed an interest?
Return potential:
Alignment Is this clear
with public and proven?
policies: Does the project contribute to or
LEGEND STAGE 3 Identified suitable projects to strengthen the enabling
(Successfully) gauged investor interest 2.4 foster the implementation of public policies that are already in place?
environment and de-risk investment where needed Risks and mitigating actions: Are these identified and credible?
Are there any public policies that may hinder project implementation?
= Yes 3.1 In case of enabling projects: The activities of the investment are
Developing the clearly understood, and there is sufficient probability that the activities
= No business model, Project developer has detailed business model
will result in the desired enabling environment.
structure, potential
impacts and In case of
Return cash flow-generating
potential: Is this clear andinvestment:
proven? The activities of the
LEGEND STAGE 3
financing strategy
Developed financialprojects
Identified suitable model to strengthen the enabling
investment are clearly understood.
environment and de-risk investment where needed 3.2 Risks and mitigating actions: Are these identified and credible?
Capital need: A clear capital need has been established with an
= Yes Developed investment plan 3.1 In case of enabling projects: The activities of the investment are
Developing the investment plan.
clearly understood, and there is sufficient probability that the activities
= No business model, Project developer has detailed business model
Financial
will resultprojections:
in the desiredThese are available
enabling to determine the risk and
environment.
structure, potential Clear link between investment in project and landscape impact potential return of the investment.
impacts and (theory of change) 3.3 In case of cash flow-generating investment: The activities of the
Developed financial model
Track record:
investment areProject
clearlydeveloper’s
understood.track record is strong.
financing strategy
3.2
Ownership of the
Capital need: project/company:
A clear capital need hasOwnership is clear and
been established with an
Developed register
Developed investment plan 3.4
preferably
investmentheld by (a) local project developer(s).
plan.
Impact: Clear
Financial description
projections: of impact
These potential
are available toindetermine
a theory of
thechange.
risk and
Clear link between investment in project and landscape impact potential return of the investment.
(theory of change) 3.3
Track record: Project developer’s track record is strong.
STAGE 4 Ownership of the project/company: Ownership is clear and
Developed register 3.4
preferably held by (a) local project developer(s).
Structuring the deal
Impact: Clear description of impact potential in a theory of change.
and engaging
investment
managers
STAGE 4
Structuring the deal
and engaging
investment
managers
How is the information presented? Context
Main text: Introduces theory, key principles and concepts related to identifying and incubating
investable landscape projects aimed at practical implementation. Globally, the investment need and appetite for sustainable agriculture, protection and resto-
ration of natural resources and rural livelihoods is growing. Investment practices in this field are
currently being led by a small number of landscape-focused investment funds that can invest
in specific projects and companies to make a contribution to meeting sustainable landscape
ambitions. The work of this small number of pioneering funds is valuable: the knowledge and
SKILLS CHECK experience gained has the potential to enhance the reputation of landscape investments. They
are often perceived as too risky and overly complex by investors, but with the right structuring
A brief summary to assess the skills and capacity needed for they are bankable.
successful implementation of this phase.
Organizations like IDH and WWF play an important role as project organizers, helping to manage
and support project developers in getting landscape projects off the ground. However, devel-
oping landscape finance projects that meet investor expectations has proven to be a challenge.
Project developers and sponsors lack a uniform approach to developing projects, often losing
CASE STUDY time and energy preparing projects that could have been identified as un-bankable at an earlier
stage. To assist project developers, this toolkit provides guidance on the design of landscape
Real-world examples are included to illustrate the guidance finance projects and investment proposals that take into account the needs of investors.
and practices described in the main text.
The toolkit focuses on designing investments in landscape finance projects that are driven by a
committed project developer, and that support biodiversity, sustainable land management, and
climate change adaptation and/or mitigation (e.g. sustainable forestry, agriculture, sustainable
aquaculture and ecotourism).
ADDITIONAL RESOURCES A distinction is made between landscape projects, and landscape finance projects:
Links to additional (non-exhaustive) resources are provided • Landscape projects are programs or activities that benefit the landscape but do not have
for further reading on the topic presented. a bankable business model, such as an educational program on regenerative agriculture;
• Landscape finance projects are investment opportunities in companies or projects in a

landscape that have (the potential for) a bankable business case, such as a loan to a re-
generative agriculture farm.
TIPS AND TRICKS
This toolkit focuses on landscape finance projects specifically. Guidance and tools are provided
Additional considerations are shared to further support the for project organizers to identify such projects: supporting landscape actors in transforming
guidance provided in the main text on key topics. landscape projects into landscape finance projects, and supporting project developers in mak-
ing them investment-ready.
CHECKLIST
Every stage ends with a checklist that can be used to assess
whether the next stage can be achieved.

A Guide
What to consider before getting started
There are several general considerations for readers to take into account:
• Time and perseverance: although the purpose of the toolkit is to make the project de-
velopment process more efficient, landscape finance projects require time and patience.
The involvement of multiple stakeholders, who in turn have their own stakeholders and “For organizations like IDH, it’s important that we can guide our
decision-making processes, can mean project development cycles can take from 1 year colleagues in a simple way to help develop an investment opportunity.
up to 5 years.
This requires a good understanding of some key financing terms and
• Accurate and realistic information: project organizers and developers should avoid a good grasp of how a potential project can match various investors’
overpromising (e.g. projecting unrealistic revenues) or “making up” missing data. During
the due diligence process, these information gaps will show up. This can damage trust
requirements, including a solid project narrative, baseline and clarity
and make investors more suspicious, which can negatively affect further discussions and on potential impacts.”
cause delays.
• Leapfrogging: for some projects, one or more of the development process stages can be Aris Wanjaya, Senior Program Manager and Investment Coordinator
accelerated. For example, if a project has an existing and creditworthy industry partner, Landscapes Asia, IDH
the investment opportunity could leapfrog to later stages.
• Dynamic roles of project organizer teams: the role that the project organizer (e.g. a
non-profit) needs to play may differ between projects. For projects with high commercial
interest (highly profitable), the project partners will probably take the lead, and the proj-
ect organizer can play a coordinating or supporting role. Projects with a lower level of
commercial viability, high complexity or high risks may require project organizers to take
a leading role. The project organizer should assess frequently whether they are best posi-
tioned themselves to take on a particular role, or if they should instead involve an advisor/
consultant, investment team, or other type of support. The “skills check” sections includ-
ed in each stage chapter also provide some guidance on this.
“This investment toolkit aims to be a practical asset to anyone on a
• Commercial viability: project developers, such as NGOs, often do not consider the proj-
ect’s commercial viability. Such projects may be in line with the organization’s impact ob- mission to leverage commercial finance for conservation purposes.
jectives, but typically rely on continued subsidies from the NGO. In order to successfully Whatever a project’s development stage, this collection of basic
raise finance for landscape finance projects, the business case needs to be commercially
viable. It is therefore important to gain insight on potential revenue and profitability early
terminology, concrete steps and real-life examples will prove a helpful
in the project. This allows project developers to involve partners on a risk-adjusted basis, guide to bankable project development regardless of the reader’s level
based on their commercial and impact requirements, and to ensure certain parties within
the project bear the required level of risk and accountability.
of expertise.”
• Classification of growth stages and risk profiles: developing investment opportunities in Arthur Muller, WWF Advisor Bankable Nature Solutions
landscapes, especially in lower capacity regions (e.g. LDCs, fragile states), when these
are greenfield, long-term and/or at an early stage of development, have a high initial risk
of failing. As such, a balance needs to be struck between the time and resources invest-
ed in the development of an investment opportunity versus the chances of a successful
deal closure several years down the line. It is recommended to regularly allow for go/no-
go decision points before proceeding to a next stage of development – for example, by
starting with a pre-feasibility assessment before completing a full feasibility assessment.

A Guide
Investors and project types
“The transition to sustainable and low-carbon development in the When compiling an initial list of potential investors for a landscape, there are several sources
landscapes requires different kinds of investment. While IDH is able to that can be scanned to identify an indicative set of potential investors.1 This preliminary scale
should consider the investors’ sector focus and alignment with the landscape strategy, their
provide grants for innovative business models and to leverage private- geographical focus, and their match with the required investment size and tenor.
sector investments, return-based investments such as those from
This guide focuses primarily on investments with a possible role for impact investors, who typ-
impact investors can help landscapes access the capital required to ically look for opportunities that have the potential to absorb between €500,000 and €20 mil-
overcome major sustainability challenges. lion in total investments in the five years after the initial engagement with the project developer,
with varying return expectations (direct contact with a targeted investor is advisable here). Oth-
er types of investors (ranging from philanthropic funds to banks) can, however, also be consid-
Currently, these projects face a huge gap in accessing public and ered to attract a funding mix that is appropriate to the project’s risk, return and impact profile.
commercial finance. Therefore, incubating such projects requires Some examples of impact investors who cooperate directly with IDH and WWF include:
a series of steps that are not always self-evident, from assessing
• Land Degradation Neutrality (LDN) Fund – invests long-term capital in profit-generating
the landscape for investment opportunities, to mobilizing the right sustainable land-use projects to reduce or reverse land degradation, mostly in the field of
stakeholders around a project, to eventually developing the business sustainable agriculture and forestry. Examples of investments made by the LDN Fund
(www.ldninsights.org) are also illustrative of the type of landscape finance projects that this
model and deal structure.” guide focuses on.
Marcela Paranhos, Senior Investment Manager Landscapes Latin America, IDH • &Green Fund – provides credit or guarantees to invest in commercial projects in agricul-
tural production value chains to protect and restore tropical forests and peatlands, and to
make agriculture more sustainable and inclusive.
• IDH Farmfit Fund – takes the highest risk positions in farmer-related transactions, thereby
reducing the farmer risk currently born by borrowers and lenders. By doing so, it catalyzes
commercial capital to co-invest in this sector and allow agri-commodity traders, agri-SMEs,
and/or financial institutions to expand the services they provide to smallholder farmers.
• Dutch Fund for Climate and Development – invests in agroforestry, sustainable land and
water use, climate-resilient food production projects, and environmental protection.
“A bankable nature-based solution is an initiative that mobilizes private
sector investment into sustainable development. It provides a win-win • AGRI3 Fund – provides guarantees to commercial banks and other financial institutions,
as well as subordinated loans to value chain clients, to mobilize financing by de-risking
outcome to build more climate-resilient ecosystems for people, nature and catalyzing transactions that create sustainable, deforestation-free agricultural supply
and economies, while simultaneously providing a financially viable chains.
project that is able to be scaled up and replicated.” Other investors and funds (e.g. C4D partners, the Landscape Resilience Fund, Tropical Land-
scape Finance Facility), as well as some local and international banks, are also active in land-
Nachilala Nkombo, WWF Country Director Zambia scape finance and could provide finance in cooperation with the aforementioned funds. In addi-
tion, there are some investment opportunities for conservation – for example, Rimba Collective2,
facilitated by Lestari Capital, aims to provide US$1 billion to protect or restore 500,000 hectares
of forest, supporting 32,000 individuals in forest communities in Southeast Asia, over 25 years.
1 ISF Advisors (isfadvisors.org/fund-database/) manages a useful free database for identifying investors; Con-
vergence Blended Finance (convergence.finance) also manages a useful paid database of previously financed
investment deals.
2 For more information on Rimba Collective, visit: lestaricapital.com/mechanisms/rimba-collective

A Guide
Process for landscape finance Introducing the four stages
projects: how is this guide Stage 1 is a rapid assessment of the landscape to efficiently identify
structured? STAGE 1 the investment needs and potential landscape finance projects that
can contribute to sustainability in the landscape. Firstly, the toolkit
Scanning for covers how to assess all the issues and their (root) causes, key
investment needs baselines, landscape actors and potential interventions. Secondly,
The landscape finance project development process covers two main phases, namely the and opportunities
it looks at how project ideas can be formulated, and how potential
project origination phase and the project development phase. The phases are further divided
investors that fit the landscape strategy can be identified.
into four stages that make up the project process.
FIGURE 1. From origination to investment-readiness: the process
Stage 2 is about engaging with the right stakeholders and

Assess compatibility with impact strategy
STAGE 2 mobilizing their commitment. The toolkit covers how to translate
Determine priority
project ideas into landscape finance projects that have the potential
regions…
Formulating to become bankable or investable according to general investors’
STAGE 1 STAGE 2 STAGE 3 STAGE 4 specific requirements.
investment projects
Scanning for Formulating Developing the Structuring the and mobilizing the
investment specific business model, deal and
needs and investment structure,
right stakeholders
engaging
opportunities projects and potential impacts investment
mobilizing the and financing managers
right stakeholders strategy
… and/or sectors
LEAD RESPONSIBILITY Stage 3 provides guidance and tools to detail out all the information
STAGE 3 and analyses investors require before considering the bankability of
HIGH
a landscape finance project. This includes financial projections, risk
Project organizer Developing the assessment, impact potential and more.
business model,
HIGH structure,
Project developer potential impacts
and financing
strategy
During the origination phase, potential projects are identified (stage 1) and formulated (stage
2). Subsequently, projects with a bankable and investable business case are developed further
during the project development phase, when they are made investment-ready to meet the
Stage 4 provides guidance and tools to work towards a successful
expectations of investors (stage 3) and an investment manager is engaged (stage 4). STAGE 4 investment deal by engaging with investors. The deal is structured
to align stakeholder interests and mitigate investment risks. It
Two key roles are the project organizer and the project developer. Where the project organizer Structuring the involves close engagement and negotiations with the investor(s)
is typically a person or entity responsible for organizing, coordinating, and overseeing the deal and to reach an agreement. Guidance is given on determining the type
development of a landscape finance project, it is the project developer who actually sets up engaging
of capital required (e.g., debt or equity), and which conditions are
or owns a business or project, taking on financial risks with the aim of making profit (for more investment
typically negotiated. The investment structure is then finalized to
information on these roles, see the section on parties involved). Stages 1 and 2 of this guide managers
meet both investor and project needs.
are primarily aimed at the project organizer, whereas stages 3 and 4 are primarily aimed at the
project developer.
While the four stages are numbered, they are not always followed sequentially. For example, a
project can be fast-tracked from stage 1 to stage 3, or even directly to stage 4 when a project
with a clear business model already in place has been identified early on.

A Guide
Parties involved
The parties typically involved in a landscape finance project, and the roles they play, are outlined
Project Project Project Investor
below.
organizer developer stakeholder
Description A person or A person or entity All affected Organization that

entity responsible who sets up or owns stakeholders, provides capital in the
for organizing, a business or project, including those form of debt (loan)
FIGURE 2. Which role are you taking on? coordinating, and taking on financial directly and or equity (ownership)
overseeing the risks with the aim of indirectly impacted with the expectation
development of a making profit. - i.e. beneficiaries, of generating a return
landscape finance customers or on investment.
WHO WHAT EXAMPLE project Sometimes, the shareholders, staff,
project developer is community, vulnerable
Person or entity Convenes, coordinates, Organizations such as also referred to as a and marginalized
responsible and supports project IDH and WWF “project operator”. groups, etc.
for organizing projects design
Project organizer
Role Leads the landscape The central and most Incurs positive impact Provides capital
finance agenda, important party for (downstream farmer so that project
Person or entity who Main risk taker and Supply chain company, convinces project the development and enjoys benefits of developers can
sets up or owns a project driver, most farmer cooperatives, developers to implementation of upstream water make the necessary
business, taking likely receiver of finance concession owner, transition to more the landscape finance treatment plant) investments to
(financial) risk service provider sustainable practices, project. The main and/or negative realize their project
Project developer
brings project risk taker, driver and impact (farmer plans. The cash that
developers and investor in the project, experiences drought is generated by the
Organization that pro- Provides capital so that Impact investors, banks, stakeholders around willing to take risks problems caused project needs to
vides capital as debt (loan) project developer can development finance the table to raise additional by deforestation) be sufficient for the
or equity (ownership) with realize project ideas, institutions financing of issues and investor to receive the
Investor ROI expectations thereby creating impact
interventions in the expected return on
landscape investment
All other stakeholders Incurs positive or (Smallholder) farmers, Example Officers from IDH Farm or plantation Depending on role: Local or international
(to be) involved in the negative impact, buyers, government, or WWF, external owners, smallholder local community banks, investment
project supports or hinders suppliers
consultants farmers and their offtakers, suppliers, funds, development
Project stakeholder investment success
groups (e.g. public sector, farmer finance institutions,
cooperatives), farmer associations philanthropic investors
associations, fintech
platform owners,
supply chain partners
(e.g. processors,
input providers),
downstream private-
sector players (e.g.
offtakers, logistics,
etc.), public bodies
(e.g. development
agencies, local
governments, etc.)

A Guide
SKILLS CHECK
STAGE 12
See also Appendix II
STAGE 1
This stage can largely be completed by the project
organizer, assuming there is sufficient knowledge
and experience with the landscape or value chain(s)
in scope. However, when engaging directly with
existing companies operating in and/or sourcing
Scanning the landscape from the landscape, or when trying to bring a new
project developer to the landscape, it is advisable
for investment needs & to include financial and business expertise in the
project organizer team. Assessing how a landscape
opportunities project could be commercially interesting to

a company requires a good grasp of business
operations, and the ability to develop a (high-level)
business case, including costs, benefits, risks
and opportunities. It is also possible to bring this
expertise on board temporarily by tendering for
additional capacity and expertise. For more on the
specific skill sets required, it is also helpful to review
information provided in later sections of this toolkit.
After drawing up a landscape strategy, the main priority is to develop land-

scape finance projects that are in accordance with the strategy and that meet
the expectations and requirements of the investors identified. This first stage
provides guidance on how to originate landscape finance project ideas.
Objective of stage 1
The objective of this stage is to efficiently identify or assess landscape finance project
ideas that have the potential to become bankable and that comply with the expec-
tations of the investors. In coming up with landscape finance projects, two main ap-
proaches can be followed:
1. Project origination based on a landscape strategy;

2. Project origination based on the market.
In the sections that follow, the workings of these two sourcing approaches are dis-
cussed.

A Guide
STAGE 12
Project origination based on a landscape strategy Review the landscape issues
Starting with a landscape strategy but a blank canvas when it comes to landscape finance ACTION
projects, the initial rapid assessment is often experienced as one of the most challenging parts Review the issues that have been identified in the landscape strategy. What are the main causes
of the development process. Where to start? Who to talk to? What kind of projects to look for? of these issues? And what impacts can be generated?
These are basic but difficult questions at this stage. Since landscape finance takes a new and
quite broad approach, narrowing the landscape strategy down to specific investment opportu- Issues
nities can be challenging. What are the most prevalent issues and how can they be resolved? For example:
Following a step-by-step approach is a more manageable way to determine the high-level land- Landscape issues Examples of causes
scape strategy:
• Deforestation and Unsustainable farming practices, resulting in land degradation and soil ero-
forest degradation sion. To get access to new farmland, farmers cut down forest area (or slash
• Land degradation and burn, an unstainable practice in its own right).
Review landscape and/ Review Formulate Determine • Biodiversity loss

or value chain needs & key solutions early • Human-wildlife
challenges stakeholders (project ideas) project risks conflict
Water scarcity Overuse of water for irrigation purposes.
Flood risks Flooding resulting from regular or extreme weather events. Sometimes
caused by soil erosion and poor absorption of water by the soil due to unsus-
1.1 Review landscape needs and tainable farming practices.
challenges Droughts As a result of climate change, weather patterns shift causing more extreme
weather events.
Water pollution Agri-processors do not treat wastewater. As a result, farmers irrigate water
with polluted water, resulting in a negative spiral of pollution.
ACTION
Review the current state of affairs in the landscape and familiarize yourself with:
Food and income Staple crops are seasonally scarce and have a high cost, farmers lack access
insecurity to markets and offtake agreements.
• Landscape challenges, risks and opportunities: what are the main challenges that this
landscape is currently facing? What is the current focus of public local / national / region- Gender constraints Uneven access to opportunities (e.g. education), sociocultural
al development policies in solving these landscape issues? Which public organizations
can provide support in developing landscape (finance) projects, and what would their Low incomes Low productivity, soil quality, lack of agricultural and business skills, lack of
role be? Which public commitments are already in place, covering this landscape (e.g. access to finance, climate change, unequal bargaining positions.
NDCs, SDGs, net-zero commitments, etc.)?

Other issues Etc.
• Past projects: what landscape (finance) projects have been initiated in the past? Who
initiated them? What can be learned from these projects? Why were they successful or
unsuccessful? Can you get in touch with the project partners for a short interview? How
can successful projects be scaled up or replicated? Actors
What type of landscape actors / businesses are causing these issues (large-scale farmers, small-
• Existing projects: are there already (pipeline) projects in the landscape being prepared holders, processors, factories, etc.)? Who can provide solutions, and what would be their role in
or developed? Who initiated them? What is their current state? What challenges are these doing so? What type of investors or financiers are already active in the landscape?
projects facing? What are the bottlenecks to further growth? Is there space for coopera-
tion to increase their ambition or scale them up?
OUTPUT
Create a brief summary of the landscape review described above.

A Guide
STAGE 12
Key baseline
What is the situation in the field that gives a baseline of where the landscape stands right now
(e.g., number of farmers, land legality status, production volumes, deforestation rates and sup-
Farmer Processor
ply chain analyses)? • Seed supplier • Large-scale • Storage silos • Milling • Wholesaler
• Agro- farm • Cool storage • Drying • Exporter
Bottlenecks chemicals • Smallholder • Trucking • Packing • Retailer
Which bottlenecks do local actors face when developing projects to address landscape issues • Importer farmers companies • Cleaning, etc.
(e.g., access to capital, infrastructure, policy, knowhow, awareness, etc.)? Do project developers Input supplier Marketing
Transport/
have access to funding? What funding sources are available and where are the major gaps? storage
OUTPUT
Brief summary of the issues, actors, key baseline and bottlenecks within the landscape. A clear view on the value chains, their actors and their interrelationships is relevant when formu-
lating a landscape strategy and identifying projects. This helps to identify interventions that can
create the most impact while also seeing where commitment from multiple stakeholders may
be required. The table below presents an overview of the typical stakeholders that are relevant
1.2 Review key stakeholders

in landscape finance, with their potential role in landscape finance projects.
Stakeholder Role in landscape finance projects

ACTION
Smallholders Implement more sustainable practices
Identify the key landscape stakeholders that have been involved or identified in the landscape
strategy and review their respective roles. A useful approach is to map the relevant value chains Mid- and large-sized Implement more sustainable practices
in the landscape to review the position of stakeholders (see below). In turn, these stakeholders farms
can be involved in scanning the landscape for investment opportunities. Farmer associations Engage smallholder farmers to implement more sustainable practices
Input providers Provide finance to (smallholder) farmers – for example, through barter
Market
OUTPUT operations and/or service delivery models (SDM)
The output of this key stakeholder review consists of both a general stakeholder overview and a
more detailed value chain overview. Marketeers and Secure offtake, pricing principles, and project sponsor
processers in early stages
The general stakeholder overview is a table of all key stakeholders with the following descrip- Implementation agency Ensure implementation of project (can also be integrated with
tions: marketeer / processor, if existing capacity is available)
Equipment providers Provide equipment for project implementation

Name Type of entity Location Current role Potential future role in
in landscape landscape Multilateral-led Provide grants or technical support to strengthen the
initiatives enabling environment
Example: Privately held Village X in Conventional Agroforestry farm owner,
Regional initiatives Provide grants or technical support to strengthen the enabling environment
Public actors
ABC Farm company landscape Y farm owner convener of stakeholders
in the landscape Traditional or Provide technical support for implementation and support to engage local
community-led initiatives stakeholders
…
National government Provide grants or technical support to strengthen the enabling environment
Local government Provide policy support for implementation through rules and regulations
If multiple stakeholders are expected to be identified within a value chain, it is advisable to draft
NGOs Provide technical support for implementation
a value chain overview that includes all actors in the chain. The overview below is an example
of typical actors in the agricultural value chain. Current funding stakeholders or providers of Banks Provide debt for implementation, and support with development of tailored
capital are not included in this overview, but it is a good idea to understand whether these financial products
Investors
stakeholders are self-funded or reliant on grant funding, as well as which type of financiers are Investment funds Provide debt/equity for implementation
involved in which part of the value chain.
Non-bank financial Provide tailored financial products, such as working capital facility, bridge
institutions loans or insurance

A Guide
CASE STUDY
Green Commodity
Landscape Program
in Cameroon
More information about this case study
Cameroon is the fourth largest cocoa-producing

country in the world, yet the Cameroonian
cocoa sector has become characterized by
poor-quality, low yields leading to a decrease
in farmer incomes. As such, many farmers
expand their land into forest areas, leading to
increased forest degradation. As cocoa-related
deforestation is expected to have a negative
impact on the cocoa sector, an increasing
number of companies have committed to
certified and deforestation-free cocoa.
FIGURE 3. What’s the link to the Roadmap to Deforestation-Free Cocoa? Building on these commitments, IDH and
WWF are co-creating the Green Commodity
© WWF-Turkey Landscape Program (GCLP) that brings together
NATIONAL LEVEL
key (cocoa) stakeholders to co-design and
Roadmap to Deforestation- Convener: Lead: Forest Sustainable Community implement actions that help protect forests,
Free Cocoa protection production & engagament & improve sustainable production of cocoa, and
& restoration marketing social inclusion enhance livelihoods for farmers and surrounding
Joint Framework for Action
communities in three selected landscapes. In
to address cocoa-related
addition to cocoa, commodities like rubber,
deforestation timber, oil palm and cassava are included in the
program.
The landscape strategy includes industry

Piloting solutions at landscape level partners (from cocoa and other sectors), public
Informing national-level policy and action plans partners, financiers, Civil Society Organizations
(CSOs), and knowledge partners. They are
working together, strengthening governance,
LANDSCAPE LEVEL setting joint targets in land-use plans to
protect forests, addressing the needs of local
Green Commodity Landscape
communities, and helping to make cocoa
Cameroon Project (GCLP)
farming a sustainable livelihood option. This will
Conveners:
Landscape-level action plan towards create a favorable environment to attract new
sustainable production, forest sources of funding and point to key investment
projection and community inclusion opportunities in line with overall landscape
developed and implemented through a goals.
participatory and inclusive approach
© IDH

A Guide
STAGE 12
Landscape sustainable development agenda:
1.3 Formulate solutions: landscape investments contributing to long-term, interlinked goals
FIGURE 4. Landscape sustainable development agenda: investments contributing to
finance project ideas long-term, interlinked goals
What interventions may lead to the desired impacts in the landscape?

Bring in a dedicated project developer
ACTION (or build capacity with one) to develop a
Identify and gather projects that have been covered in the landscape strategy. Formulate land- business model around agroforestry
scape finance project ideas, briefly describing (i) the business model, (ii) the relevant landscape planted as a buffer zone to native
Work with a fintech and/or local bank to forests, with a management structure
aspects it contributes to, (iii) the landscape issues it solves, and (iv) the relevant stakeholders provide loans to smallholder farmers for that is gradually handed over to local
involved (e.g. who the project developer could be). inputs and to plant trees (e.g., communities or farmer coops, to
windbreaks), reducing crop sensitivity to support community income and protect
Determine the scope of these potential projects based on their current presence. What is the drought and climate change. wildlife.
expected revenue-generating capacity of the project idea? Does a local or international market
exist, and are there existing landscape actors that already serve these markets? For example, in
the case of a sustainable palm oil project idea: are there already landscape actors farming, pro-
cessing, and selling palm oil, and what is the scale of these activities? Seek capital for a newly establis-
hed or existing processing plant Develop a pepper
OUTPUT for a wastewater treatment intercropping/agroforestry system
The output of this stage could look like figure 4. facility. The landscape impact for (e.g. banana, timber) and work with
the project can be established by a (international) buyer to prepare an
linking treated water supply to investment proposition for scaling.
farmers in the area.
D Implement and finance drip irrigation for

Work with a sustainable (timber or
H=&'()*&+& smallholder farmers as a mitigative measure
cattle) company in the landscape D6*+$(-;&
9G against a decrease in water availability
to develop an Integrated
downstream, through cooperation between
Tree-Crop Livestock farming
the smallholder community, implementation
system (“silvopasture”) with a
agency and offtaker(s).
farmer/ community profit-sharing
Directly engaging with companies and (possible) project mechanism.
developers in the landscape
Not all landscape finance projects are necessarily greenfield projects that need to
be developed from scratch. Landscape finance projects (or ideas) may already exist
(brownfield) and may be ready for implementation or expansion. It is useful to actively
identify these projects through engagement and meetings with smallholders or
companies that are active in the landscape.
The goal of these meetings should be to identify and assess existing projects plans, the
potential role of the project for the landscape strategy, and whether financing needs
exist. Doing this may allow the project to move directly to stage 2 or 3, depending on
the progress already made by the project developer.
Requirements to assess whether a landscape finance project can fast-track to stage 2

are mentioned at the end of this chapter. Before moving to stage 3, check whether the
criteria mentioned in at the end of the next chapter (stage 2) are met.

A Guide
STAGE 12
1.4 Assess risks and possible red flags
Every project comes with risks, some more obvious than others. The risks of project ideas
should be assessed to identify any “red flags” that render the project idea unfeasible. It is there-
fore important to understand the risks that may impact the (financial) outcomes of the project.
Projects with high risks, few mitigative measures, and limited earning potential are unlikely to
CHECKLIST
receive financing.
ACTION Final checklist before moving to the next stage

A risk assessment, including project partner financial capacity and the environmental and social
impacts, can be performed by developing a high-level risk register in which risks are identified Landscape finance project ideas: What are the relevant landscape finance project
and mitigating actions are formulated. If a risk cannot be mitigated, it is designated as a red ideas that fit within the landscape strategy?
flag.
Brief description per landscape finance project idea: Which landscape issues does it
OUTPUT solve? Who are the stakeholders involved? What is the business model?
High-level risk register – for example:
Risk Mitigating Risk acceptance

action level
Agriculture in the project area is Irrigation from a nearby water Acceptable

sensitive to climate change, causing
more frequent droughts, fires and
source is adequate, which can be
financed
floods
Water from a nearby source is pollut- Water treatment prior to irrigation Red flag
ed by local industry, requiring water would mitigate this risk, but the in- Additional resources for learning to scan landscape finance
treatment before irrigation vestment and operational costs are opportunities:
deemed too high, considering the
cash flows the project is expected if your aim is to look more broadly at landscape finance, consider looking at:
to make
• Landscape Finance & Investment Toolkit (LIFT) developed by EcoAgriculture
Partners;
• Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) on landscape finance and restoration as a
business. Organizations that have developed such courses include: Commonland,
Rotterdam School of Management and Wageningen University.

A Guide
STAGE 12
Project origination based on the market
Project sourcing can also be done through market-based approaches. These approaches can that will generally improve the landscape or parts thereof. In these cases, some guidance should
be used in a landscape where a landscape strategy is in place, but they can also potentially be be provided on project types, although space should be allowed for project developers to inno-
used to source projects in landscapes where there is no such strategy or where it is still under vate and propose various project types.
development.
The eligibility criteria describe the requirements that an applicant should meet and therefore
functions as an initial filter. Typical eligibility criteria may include:
Traditional sourcing approaches Preferred criteria for the project developer:
Minimum years of business operations

Investment fund managers have traditionally used sector leadership and networking with indus- • Minimum annual turnover (e.g. US$500,000)
try players to build their capacity to source opportunities. These approaches involve: • Diverse management / staff (e.g. gender, skills)
• Clear and transparent ownership structure with strong management team
Establishing visible sector leadership • Successful track record in setting up landscape finance projects
The goal of sector leadership is to visibly establish yourself as an expert in your chosen sector, • Minimum ESG management
thereby becoming the go-to investor when companies are seeking capital. Some channels that
are typically utilized by fund managers to establish sector leadership include marketing of in- Criteria for the landscape finance project
vestment cases, publication of research and thought leadership pieces, realization of projects, • High social / environmental impact (e.g. agroforestry or conservation program)
speaking at relevant conferences, networking at events or through relevant associations, and • Commercially viable business case
cooperation with relevant sectors players, such as investors in smallholders, agroforestry, forest- • Proven additionality role in the landscape (is it something that will happen with or without
ry, or conservation. the required support?)
Building networks with sector stakeholders

There are various ways to build a network with sector stakeholders: through participating or
representing at relevant conferences and networking events, and through direct contacts with
other investment managers within other organizations or funds.
Direct contacts are established by investment officers using their broad professional network.
An organization may consider recruiting an investment officer with such experience and net-
work, or may decide to build these relationships themselves through focusing on bilateral meet-
ings with other investors and value chain actors. The latter approach is considered to be more
time consuming and resource intensive.
TIPS & TRICKS

Proactive sourcing approaches
Note
A good proposal may not always have all
Instead of (or in addition to) traditional sourcing, there are also more proactive approaches. these elements yet in place. For example,
Namely: it could be that there is not yet a long track
record when starting out. As such, do not
Issuing a call for proposals necessarily be discouraged from responding
To issue a call for proposals, the organization needs to indicate the types of projects sought, eli- to an applicant. Make sure there is at least
gibility criteria for investment opportunities, and a selection process. In situations where a land- clear alignment: that it is applicable to the
scape strategy is in place, the call for proposals can be tailored to this strategy. Where no such key terms/scope of the project developer,
strategy is in place or where it is still being developed, the call for proposals can invite projects and demonstrates sound business practices
and a viable model, with a clear pathway
towards meeting all criteria.

A Guide
STAGE 12
Organizing a collaborative platform
An application form usually requires a serious time investment for both the applicant and the
reviewer. In general, the number of applications to a call for proposals can be very high. To Organize an annual platform meeting to which selected stakeholders from the landscapes are
make this process more efficient, it is advised to split this into two phases in which the expres- invited. This platform serves as a networking and knowledge-sharing event. Project owners get
sion-of-interest stage functions as a filter. However, depending on the nature of the call, only the opportunity for “speed dating” with an investment officer, and to pitch their business plan.
one phase may also suffice.
A pool of external consultants (Financial Advisory Service (FAS) providers) can provide sup-
port to source deals. These FAS providers are incentivized on a pay-for-results basis to identify,
package and present investment opportunities. FAS providers are paid fees on meeting specific
Example
targets for deal identification, and when this opportunity has been taken over by an investment
The selection process for a call for proposals could look like this: manager. See Appendix III for the steps to implement this.
Phase 1: Expression of interest (four deadlines per year)

Interested participants should first scan the landscape strategy that has been developed, go
through the eligibility criteria and look through our website to fully understand what we do, then
send an email formally introducing your company/project and expressing interest to [insert email
address]
Phase 2: Submit proposal

On receipt of your expression of interest, we will send you the application details and conditions
along with an application form and guidelines for preparing your proposal and pitch deck.
Phase 3: Selection
The selection process will be carried out in three distinct stages:
1. Selection of longlist with 10-20 ideas from all proposals received.
2. Evaluation of the applicants selected, and interviews with the project owners. A shortlist
of 5-10 projects will then be announced.
3. Final evaluation of shortlisted applicants. Further documentation to support the project

appraisal are required at this stage.
Phase 4: Agreements
Relevant agreements will be drawn up with the shortlisted companies. Selected applicants will be
included in our pipeline and are eligible for investment

A Guide
SKILLS CHECK
STAGE 2
STAGE 2
At this stage, you may want to consider bringing in
additional expertise: either as a long-term position
or through a short-term specific assignment (e.g.
a consultant to support on the investment model
development). Towards the end of this stage, there
Formulating specific should be a clear project developer involved;

the role of the project organizer is preparing to
investment projects shift towards enabling environment projects. The

project organizer should have good convening and
and mobilizing the right communication skills, while also understanding the
perspective of businesses and project developers,
stakeholders as well as investors. The latter is important in the

final step of this stage, when you will be checking
early interest with potential investors. As such, the
project team should have a good grasp of what
investors are looking for in projects.
This stage covers the next steps in developing the project ideas that were
identified under stage 1. The main challenge for the project organizer here is
to ensure that the landscape finance project structure and return-generat-
ing potential meet the requirements of the investors identified. In this stage,
guidance is provided on how to develop a landscape finance project concept
note that can be shared with investors for review.
The objective is to formulate clear concept notes for landscape finance projects, in
cooperation with project developers, that meet the expectations of potential investors.
With the use of the concept note, the initial investor interest can be gauged. The steps
in this process are as follows:
Identify entry points Define Assess Check early

and stakeholders to revenue investment investor
engage model potential interest

A Guide
STAGE 2
2.1 Identify entry points of the
landscape finance project
The specific entry points for investment can be made more concrete by creating a project
model. Below are six examples of typical entry points for landscape finance projects that can
ACTION be considered. It should be noted, however, that other configurations or combinations of those
The first step in formulating a concept for a landscape finance project is to make a preliminary included, may also be possible.
description of the project using the formula below.
ACTION
Below is a list of possible entry points for finance to support landscape projects. This list is non
Preliminary formulation of landscape finance project
exhaustive, but serves to provide inspiration and guidance. Check which of the entry points
best fits the landscape finance project. If none fit, then skip directly to Preliminary formulation of
1 Issue Description of the landscape issue(s), causes and scale landscape finance project table.
2 Proposed Description of proposed intervention(s) to solve landscape issue(s),

intervention(s) including which challenge will be addressed, and the potential impacts ENTRY POINT 1: FINANCING EXISTING COMPANIES TO BECOME MORE
to address
issue SUSTAINABLE, OR TO EXPAND/GROW EXISTING SUSTAINABILITY INITIATIVES
3 Impacts The environmental and social impacts that arise from the proposed
interventions. Impacts can be described in both qualitative and
quantitative terms. Some key metrics often applied and considered by Investors Financing (typically debt, as these established companies
investors are the number of farmer livelihoods supported through the are generally not looking for additional equity) the significant
investment, number of hectares covered, and climate impact (tons of investments to be made by medium / large companies
Existing company
CO2 equivalent reduced) to transition their conventional business model to a more
sustainable approach. For example, a plantation company
Landscape: area under shifting to integrating on-concession conservation and
4 Entry point Description of the investment entry point (see also next section) improved water management. This business model has indirect
direct management,
fixed assets, and/or landscape benefits because it helps reduce fire risks, protect
farmers and communities natural resources by acting as a buffer zone, or limit overuse of
5 Identification Description of landscape actors involved and their respective roles:
watershed, etc.
of relevant
1. Medium- and large-sized farms operating under conventional
landscape
farming practices
actors
2. The farming community predominately consists of smallholders,
aggregators/cooperatives and a few processing facilities. Type of financing involved Long-term (patient) debt
Smallholder farmers are best reached through local farmer
associations
Challenges for landscape Resolves the challenges encountered by businesses in
3. Involvement of aggregators or cooperatives could be necessary financing resolved attracting financing to improve their sustainability
to reach farmers, but also to reach international offtakers who may
pay a premium for Fairtrade-certified products
Appropriate context Best suited for financing of medium / large businesses that
4. An implementation agency will be required for awareness raising,
have existing cash flows and are able to take on debt
training and monitoring of sustainable farming practices
5. Input suppliers may need to be involved for supply of good-quality

Examples • A large rubber concession holder in Indonesia seeking
agricultural inputs
capital to protect HCV/HCS forest on- and off-concession
6. Offtakers in the form of processors, exporters, retail organizations and provide community livelihood support, while intensifying
or trading companies rubber production for a global market
Optional stakeholders at this stage are listed below, and are dependent • A timber company with forestry concessions in West
on the requirements and level of development of a project: Africa seeking capital for new planting, and to develop a
smallholder outgrower scheme
7. Local government – for permits or implementation and
enforcement of legislation • A large cattle supply chain company operating in Brazil,
seeking capital to green its supply chain, including increased
8. Financial partners – for provision of finance or risk-mitigating traceability, farmer restoration support to comply with local
products: grants, loans, insurance (to reduce risk for farmers) laws and policies, and low carbon agriculture

A Guide
STAGE 2
ENTRY POINT 2: FINANCING SUSTAINABILITY VIA SERVICE PROVIDERS ENTRY POINT 3: NEW COMPANY OR VEHICLE, POTENTIALLY WITH LOCAL OWNER-
SHIP STRUCTURE OVER TIME
Investors
Financing intermediaries (such as fintech
companies or value chain service providers) Investors
Service provider Financing of (newly established or scale-up)
to support multiple small-scale farmers,
greenfield project to address a landscape need
farmer cooperatives or communities to
New company (e.g. greenfield plantation, either privately owned
transition to sustainable farming practices.
or with smallholder farmers, to restore land and
For example, financing the transition towards
protect other natural resources). Due to the newly
1 2 X fewer and higher quality fertilizers and seeds
Landscape: area under established, greenfield nature of the project, equity
by channeling capital or in-kind agricultural
direct management, TIME is the most suitable financing instrument.
inputs through service providers, fintech
Landscape: Farmers and communities fixed assets, and/or
companies and farmer cooperatives to
farmers and communities
efficiently reach smallholder farmers and/or
e.g. farmer other landscape stakeholders.
cooperatives or
village forest
e.g. new (temporary)
companies
operator to develop the
project and transfer
ownership to local
Type of financing involved community structures
Working capital finance, long-term debt (farm
level) or equity (fintech level)
Type of financing involved Equity / debt
Challenges for landscape Smallholder farmers often lack the knowledge

financing resolved Challenges for landscape Model can help in situations where local context
and financial capacity to make the transition
financing resolved (climate, soil, etc.) offers development opportunity
towards sustainable farming practices
for nonexistent local business practice
Appropriate context Where farmers are organized in organizations,

Appropriate context Where local initiatives are too small or lack the
such as cooperatives, which can facilitate
financing and efficient communications with knowledge and financial capacity to develop a
the farming community project, and the project developer is able to train
the community over time, whereafter the ownership
of the project is sold to a local landscape actor
Examples • A service provider in Kenya offering a
range of bundled services to small timber
Examples A newly established processing plant to allow
growers, including inputs, technical advice,
harvesting and offtake, thereby acting as an for offtake of coffee farmers transitioning to
aggregation point for market access as well agroforestry systems, of which shares are
as finance transferred over time to participating farmer
cooperatives receiving investment
• A service provider in Indonesia allowing for
aggregation of coconut sugar supply from
A newly set up ‘buffer zone management company’
smallholders, as well as providing support
supporting groups of communities along at-risk
to building a coconut sugar processing
forests, based on secured land rights, to develop
plant
cocoa agroforestry systems that act as a buffer zone
• A service provider operating a cassava to native forest. They can establish partnerships
block farm in Nigeria: a large and with the company, which in turn can attract capital
contiguous plot of land leased or owned by and act as an aggregator for offtakers
the provider, which is divided into smaller
sub-plots of several hectares that are
individually farmed by smallholders

A Guide
STAGE 2
ENTRY POINT 4: PROJECT FINANCE ENTRY POINT 5: (LOCAL) FINANCIAL INTERMEDIARIES
Investors Investors
Financing through a dedicated project vehicle to enable the Financing of landscape projects through local financial
transaction of a landscape project. intermediaries such as a bank, which can be locally based,
Project company or Local) financial or a fintech provider.
Special Purpose Vehicle intermediary
(SPV) (e.g. bank, fintech)
Landscape: area under Farmers and

direct management, fixed communities,
assets, and/or farmers landscape stakeholders
and communities
Type of financing involved Debt Type of financing involved Debt
Challenges for landscape Financing of projects that consist of multiple components, Challenges for landscape Servicing landscape stakeholders that can normally not be
financing resolved such as capital to cooperatives, development of new fixed financing resolved directly financed by larger (international) impact investors,
assets (e.g. processing plant), and the need for dedicated and investments that involve a need for local currency and/
local currency, therefore requiring a point of aggregation for or existing local infrastructure and know-how.
investors to step in
Appropriate context Presence of a (local) financial intermediary with a
Appropriate context Created for a specific objective, often to isolate financial risk. (willingness to establish) a client portfolio of key landscape
As it is a separate legal entity, if the parent company goes stakeholders (such as smallholder farmers directly or
bankrupt, the Special Purpose Vehicle can continue through cooperatives, mills and other aggregators), and
which has the infrastructure/network, know-how and
risk appetite to develop loan products that address key
Examples A non-profit organization supporting setup of a local Special landscape needs.
Purpose Vehicle that can supply term loans in local currency
to eligible farmer cooperatives, who can subsequently on-lend
to members to allow them to transition to coffee agroforestry Examples A local bank providing a loan product with a long tenor
systems through support from an international impact investor in
local currency for farmers to restore land in line with local
rules and regulations.

A Guide
STAGE 2
Engage with potential project developers
ENTRY POINT 6: LOCAL FUND STRUCTURE
Once a suitable investment entry point has been identified, a potential project developer needs
A dedicated landscape finance fund
to finance multiple projects within the
to be hired and onboarded by the project organizer to further develop the project idea. This re-
Investors lationship is a result of earlier years of partnership, identifying common interest, and being able
landscape. This can take multiple forms
including, for example, an endowment to make a strong enough business case. The project developer has a role in attracting finance
(Landscape) fund/vehicle fund type of structure that allows returns and executing the project.
generated from investments to be used
no as grants for non-return-based landscape
returns
returns needs such as conservation activities
ACTION
(surveillance, patrolling, etc.). Generally speaking, the project organizer first has bilateral meetings with the prospective proj-
Small Small Small
project 1 project 2 project 3 ect developer, explaining the business case, their potential role, and how the project idea can
be further developed. This can be challenging, especially if the project developer has no prior
experience, or if interests do not align. Engagement and building alignment with project devel-
Landscape: Farmers and communities
opers may prove to be challenging.
Key to creating alignment with project developers is to provide a clear explanation of the busi-
Type of financing involved Debt and, depending on the type of fund, ness case and additional benefits of the project, as well as the risk of taking no action in the
grants
landscape. Experienced project organizers highlight that engagement at the right time and at
the right level is key, and that jointly building the business case through a co-funded project
Challenges for landscape Multiple landscape projects with while already planning ahead to scale up the project with a third-party investor helps. Examples
financing resolved investment needs that cannot normally of benefits that can be used to convince project developers include:
be met by international (impact) investors
due to the investment size in relation to the • Reduced operating costs;
transaction costs, some projects may also
not generate financial returns at all (such • Competitive advantages in fast-developing markets;
as conservation of natural forests). • Broader client base;
• Higher long-term viability of the business;
Appropriate context Landscapes of significant size (or a
• Improved reputation;
combination of landscapes with similar
characteristics) to justify the operational • Ability to attract the best talent;
and management costs of a dedicated • Access to (cheaper or structured) finance;
landscape fund, with sufficient potential
project pipeline to generate healthy • Product premium through certification;
financial returns. • Volume advantages through economies of scale.
Examples A landscape fund/vehicle that attracts

investment from larger capital providers
such as international (impact) investors
providing debt (e.g. micro-finance, value
chain finance and climate finance) to
smaller projects such as in agriculture, and
TIPS & TRICKS
which can also support several lower to
no-return based projects that are generally
higher risk.
Engaging downstream players
One approach to finding and engaging with potential project developers

is through the market. For example, by engaging global brands that source
commodities from landscapes. These brands have a desire to green their
supply chains, and can be instrumental in identifying local suppliers and
providing incentives (e.g. offtake agreements) for these companies to
invest in sustainable production and/or transition their own factories/
plantations to greener/cleaner production.

A Guide
CASE STUDY
STAGE 2
Preparing community
agroforestry for
investment in Indonesia
A project by Fairventures Social Forestry, supported

by the Land Degradation Neutrality (LDN) Technical
Assistance Facility (TAF) linked to the LDN Fund
managed by Mirova, aims to initially rehabilitate
4,000 hectares of degraded lands through planting
fast-growing tree species and cash crops in
agroforestry systems, and increasing the value of
secondary forests through enrichment plantings
with non-timber forest products (NTFPs).
This project is a good example of a potential FIGURE 5. Flow of finance and services
innovative restoration finance case that was
initiated by an NGO and turned into a for-profit
social venture. The operation is currently looking LEGEND
to secure financing to implement a successful
E Equity LDN Fund
showcase at significant size, followed by initial
private investment for scaling up impact on Div Dividend
LDN and creating income opportunities for local D
communities. D Debt
Sale of timber, cash I+P
I Interest crops and NTFPs Profit sharing
P Principal
Markets Fairventures Farmer groups LDN TAF*
TA Technical Social Forestry
Assistance
VCU Verified
Carbon Timber, cash
Revenue
Units (VCU) crops and NTFPs
TA
PROJECT
Sustainable Agriculture / Agroforestry Forest protection
* Managed by IDH – The Sustainable Trade Initiative

A Guide
STAGE 2
OUTPUT 2. Indirect revenues (i.e. cash flows to the project that do not come directly from the sale of
Once a landscape finance project seems promising, a Letter of Intent (LoI) can be signed be- services, products or activities) can support the business model but will not form a major
tween the project organizer and project developer, outlining the intention of both parties to in- part of the revenue stream. Examples include:
vest resources in developing the landscape finance project with the aim of attracting financing.
a. Carbon credits
• Public and private offtakers purchasing credits to meet regulatory or voluntary commit-
ments
2.2 Develop high-level business model • Key to success are regulatory markets, voluntary international markets, and jurisdic-
tional approaches to REDD+
• Standards, proper MRV systems and strong reference levels
• Benefit-sharing mechanism
While a complete business case will be developed during stage 3, at this stage a high-level busi-
ness model of the landscape finance project should be developed to assess the bankability of
the project. It is crucial that the landscape finance project is of sufficient scale, and will be able b. Payment for ecosystem services
to generate adequate revenue streams to realize a profit. Assessing the profitability potential
• Performance-based payment by downstream actors for the preservation of upstream
is essential, as investors (both impact and commercial) will ultimately require a return on their
ecosystems
investments.
• Key to success is the presence of committed offtakers
In the following action points, general guidance for preparing a high-level business model is
provided (there are also several useful studies and guidance notes referenced at the end of this
section). As the following action points involve the estimation of financial figures, they are best ACTION 2: QUANTIFY THE REVENUE STREAMS by making a revenue projection based on a number of
calculated in a spreadsheet. Please be aware that this merely serves as an illustration of the high-level assumptions. In estimating the project revenues, there should be a general idea of the
main components required in a business model. scale of the project.
ACTION 1: DEFINE A REVENUE MODEL, including direct and indirect revenues. Examples of reve- For example, in an agricultural project, the revenues can be estimated by making an assumption
nue-generating routes for various types of landscape finance project are described below to of the number of smallholder farmers (5,000), the average farm size per farmer (2 hectares),
illustrate the possibilities. and the average crop yield (10 tons per hectare). Yield per hectare should be based on historical
production yields or what is common for the area. Based on these figures, the total production
1. Direct revenues (i.e. cash flows to the project directly from sale of the services, products or volume of the project is 100,000 tons.
other activities), such as:
Based on product pricing, the total project revenue can then be estimated. In determining the
product price, it is best to use market prices that are regularly published publicly. If farmers are
Type of landscape Potential (improved) revenue streams able to sell their produce at the farm gate (without transportation) at a price of US$20 per ton,
finance project the project is projected to generate US$2 million in revenue annually, or US$400 per farmer or
US$200 per hectare.
Climate-smart Increased crop yields due to sustainable farming, higher quality produce,
agriculture product premium with certification, carbon credits through healthier soils,
lower costs due to decrease in use of fertilizers, pesticides and water
Agroforestry (Diversification of) crop sales (e.g. coffee, rubber), product premium with
certification, carbon credits through healthier soils and forestry
Forestry Sales from lumber, FSC or RSPO certification premium, carbon credits
(conservation) through forestry and potentially eco-tourism
Water treatment Sales of clean drinking and/or irrigation water, cost savings due to reduction
facilities of water usage, feed-in tariff of government
Environmental Renewable energy (non-biomass) is often cheaper compared to many car-

protection through bon-heavy, polluting energy alternatives, such as coal, wood, oil, etc.
renewable energy

A Guide
STAGE 2
ACTION 3: DETERMINE PROJECT COSTS. In order to assess whether the project is profitable, the Projects may also require capital to expand the business or integrate value chain activities in the
annual operating costs (OPEX) should be estimated. The operating costs can be projected by business model. In these cases, the total investment costs can be determined based on what it
creating a high-level overview of the inputs and activities that are required to generate revenue. would cost to acquire the assets to expand the business and the extra working capital that may
Using the example from before, the following projection can be made: be needed.
Cost item Cost per hectare
Seeds US$10 ACTION 5: DETERMINE PROJECT NEEDS FOR TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE

Fertilizer and pesticides US$30
OUTPUT
Labor US$50 Generate a brief overview of what the business model looks like.
Water license US$10
How will the project generate Describe how the project will generate revenues. For example:
Irrigation equipment (depreciation) US$20
revenue? sale of agricultural crops and carbon credits
Electricity for water pump US$30
Quantification of revenue Quantify, to the extent possible at this stage, the revenues
Total costs per hectare US$150 expected from the project. For example: US$2 million per year,
assuming that 5,000 farmers will be involved in a total area of
Total project costs (x10,000 hectares) US$1.5 million 10,000 hectares, with a yield of 20 tons per hectare and price of
US$10 per ton
In determining the production costs, it is important to document how these costs are derived/ Quantification of costs Quantify, to the extent possible, the costs expected from this
calculated. What is the information source used in determining the costs? project. For example: US$1.5 per year
Profitability Reflect on profitability of the project, once in full production
ACTION #4: DETERMINE THE PROFITABILITY of the project by subtracting the project costs from the Investment costs Describe the nature and amount of investments needed to realize
the project (e.g. due diligence costs, legal fees, etc.)
project revenues. What is the projected profit and percentage of profit margin (profit divided by
revenue)?
Technical assistance needs Describe what and how additional support may be needed to
reach project maturity
Revenue US$2 million
Financial and technical Describe where the activities to be covered by the technical
Production costs US$1.5 million additionality for technical assistance will address challenges and gaps in the project, and
assistance why it cannot be funded by other parties involved
Profit US$500,000
Profit margin 25%
ACTION 4: DETERMINE THE INVESTMENT REQUIREMENT of the project by assessing what resources
(that are currently unavailable), are required to realize the project. In the case of smallholder
farmers, working capital may be required. Farmers need to plant seeds and tend to their farm-
land (costs) before crops (revenues) can be harvested. Often smallholder farmers lack the re-
sources to make these upfront investments, and as a result use inefficient and ineffective farm-
ing practices, resulting in low yields, low-quality production, and loss of income.
In the example above, the working capital requirement is US$1.5 million per year, and in this
case would be the investment requirement of the project. Another important investment re-
quirement may be the capital expenditure (CAPEX) for the purchase of land.

A Guide
STAGE 2
2.3 Ensure that bankability Criteria Description Way to improve
requirements can be met Revenue Investors want to invest in Develop business model that generates
and companies that generate revenue revenues in the relatively short term
returns and positive operational cash (preferred but not always required). If the
While landscape finance projects offer tremendous opportunities to make an impact on land-
flows. business model is not able to produce
scapes, their success relies on their bankability – and hence on their revenue-generating model, direct revenues and positive operational
financial structure and ESG requirements. Typical requirements for bankability are outlined in cash flows, refer to section 2.4 in which
the table below, with examples of ways to improve the investment opportunities to meet each revenue-generating models are covered.
requirement.
ESG Investment opportunities Secure sustainability commitments from
ACTION standards need to adhere to certain ESG the project stakeholders with time-bound
Assess bankability of the landscape finance project against the following criteria. and impact standards, contributing to specific milestones for improvement; conduct
Sustainable Development Goals an ESIA with the use of a grant from
(SDGs). DFCD’s Origination Facility; follow the ESG
performance standards of the IFC.
Revenue and returns Ticket size Financing of any ticket size below Investigate how project size can be
Generate revenue and US$1 million is not considered increased – for example, through bundling
to be cost effective by most more smallholder farmers. If increasing the
positive cash flow
investors. For large investment project size is unfeasible, bundling different
funds, the minimum starts at US$5 projects is also an option, as long as these
ESG standards and impact Reputational risk
million. are housed within the same legal entity.
Comply with standards; demon- Negative and positive
Sometimes the forecast that an investor
strate positive impact contribution associations for both investor can grow with the business and expand its
and project partner position in the business (staged approach)
can also increase the investment appetite.
Ticket size
Financial
Match with investor Alternatively, identify other potential
management
expectation; enable larger CRITERIA TO BE investors that accept smaller ticket sizes,
Consistent records and
ticket size CONSIDERED especially in the early project assessment
appropriate systems stage.
“INVESTABLE”
Capital type Track record
Debt, equity, other Proven ability to Capital type Landscape finance investments Investigate whether the potential investor(s)
manage investment typically have insufficient capacity can provide structured debt according to
to service debt payments. the capacity of the project to service the
and create impact
Therefore, seek investment debt. This can often be achieved through
Land rights opportunities that can absorb conditions such as grace periods, profit
equity, long-term debt or any warrants, alternative draw-down conditions,
Clear and secured rights, Risk sharing and collaterals
type of mezzanine financing (also etc.
with local ownership Who is taking what risks?
called quasi-equity: anything in
Legal status and Another form of long-term capital is equity.
between debt and equity), as this
ownership Equity is most suitable for investments in
suits the long payback period
growth companies or in assets that are
Legal entity; transaction better.
high risk and take considerable time to pay
structure
back. Due to the illiquid nature of equity in
landscape finance, it is not a feasible option
in most cases.

A Guide
STAGE 2
Criteria Description Way to improve Reputational In the last decade, an increasing It is advisable to go through all potential
risk number of impact investors and reputational risks that could become a
DFIs have incurred reputational red flag with the Investment Committee
Land rights Depending on the nature of the Focus on investment opportunities with risk due to impact investments during the due diligence phase. Examples
project, a secure land title and secure land titles. Depending on the that turned out not to have the of such red flags are the use of child labor,
land rights are a prerequisite for local context, however, this may not be expected impact. This is partially forced labor, dumping of chemical waste,
some investors. Furthermore, a very strict investor requirement. There due to unclear ESG criteria, and illegal deforestation, or disrespecting land
a land title will provide local are various standards available that can partially due to the complexity rights of indigenous people and local
landowners with security to initiate contribute to land rights and titles, such as of an Environmental and Social communities.
long-term activities. FPIC and VGGT. Impact Assessment (ESIA). As
such, investors might be fairly
Legal status Investors require a legal entity in Crucial for the investor is to have an reluctant to invest when there are
and the form of a privately registered accountable representative who has full reasons to suspect a reputational
ownership company in which they can decision-making authority. It is advised to risk.
invest. Few investors consider establish this privately registered entity
investing in other legal entities in the country of operations. But in some
such as producer organizations or cases, it can facilitate fundraising to set
cooperatives. Furthermore, it must up a holding structure in a country that is
be clear who owns the company, more similar to the source country of the OUTPUT
what their background is, and investment. Completed table, as presented above, briefly assessing the landscape finance project on all
who takes decisions (“Know Your
criteria.
Customer”). This is to prevent
money laundering or financing of
terrorism.
Risk There are various ways to optimize Ensure in an early stage that risk appetite of
sharing risk sharing in a project. One of key project partners is clearly understood
the more popular is through the and work to address potential challenges,
provision of collateral. If debt is e.g. if it’s clear that there is no key off-
the preferred form of investment, taker involved this would be a main focus
lenders generally want to see of a development/TA phase. Additional
collateral of at least the value of expertise can be sought in case of a
the investment. need for further advice on (innovative)
risk sharing models from the project
perspective.
Track Most investors seek investment Focus on investments with a proven track
record opportunities with at least two record of preferably two years, or work
years of track record, and are less with the project developer to develop this
willing to invest in a company proof of concept (e.g. by accessing grants
that is pre-revenue or at concept and TA) with a concrete investor in mind.
stage. Furthermore, the extent of The management team should have an
the experience of the company extensive and relevant background in the
and its management is often key activities of the landscape finance project.
in successfully raising capital.
Financial During the due diligence phase, Make sure that the landscape finance
management investors will look in detail at the project has all financial data ready to be
financial management records shared during the due diligence phase.
of the landscape finance project.
It is of the utmost importance to
have clear and consistent financial
records for all financial years.

A Guide
CASE STUDY
STAGE 2
Preparing for investment to improve
the resilience of the Mekong Delta
WWF and the Dutch Fund for Climate and Development (DFCD), together
with their corporate partner Minh Phu Seafood Corp, initiated the Mekong
Delta Sustainable Rice and Aquaculture Project in Vietnam, to build a more
sustainable & climate-resilient food production model for people and nature.
Landscape challenge: The main food production in the Mekong Delta consists
of rice and aquaculture. The high use of chemical fertilizers, pesticides
and antibiotics degrades the environment and puts biodiversity at risk.
Diseases threatening aquaculture can spread rapidly. Meanwhile, farmers are
increasingly vulnerable to droughts and the intrusion of salt water into their
land.
Investment solution: The solution is a model seeking to support sustainable

mixed rice and shrimp farming. The objective is to produce responsible
premium food for the growing international markets. The use of chemical
intrants will be avoided. The project aims to optimize sediment deposits in
the paddies and fertilize naturally the soil. Planning at the commune level
will allocate specific canals to bring clean intake water while other canals
will evacuate dirty discharged water. This will prevent spreading pollutants
and contaminating shrimps with harmful diseases. As access to clean water
will be facilitated, farmers will not have to pump underground water from
the depleted aquifers. These new practices are expected to allow farmers to
increase by 2.5 times their shrimp production, resulting in significantly higher
income for poor communities. This model will therefore increase the reliance
of food production, and it will also improve the physical resilience of the wider
landscape by enhancing the sedimentation process to counterbalance the
subsidence of the fast sinking Mekong Delta, thereby building with nature to
strengthen climate change adaptation.
How to get there? Implementation is made possible through grants provided

by WWF under the DFCD, complemented by grants from Minh Phu, its
partners and the provincial authorities. The project will start Q4 2021 with
implementing three pilot sites on 110 hectares to demonstrate the merits
of the concept under varying conditions and build proof of concept for the
business model, as well as test the anticipated ESG impacts for the landscape.
The model will then be put forward to scale up to 30,000 hectares by 2028,
for which seafood company Minh Phu will receive a €35 million ten-year loan
from the DFCD. Technical advice on the project is provided by Professor Xuan
WWF Consultant group visit Soc Trang
of the Nam Can Tho University, a leading expert in sustainable farming in the
Mekong Delta, as well as the Dutch NGO Deltares, renowned experts in fluvial
systems and adaptative delta planning.

A Guide
STAGE 2
2.4 Check early investor interest
CHECKLIST
Incorporating the information developed in the previous steps, a landscape finance project
concept note can be used to gauge the interest of potential investors. At this stage, it is useful
to check whether investors are interested in the concept of the landscape finance project, to
ensure that no resources are wasted in developing the project in more detail if there is a lack of Final checklist before moving to the next stage
interest.
• Stakeholders: Have the stakeholders in the landscape – who are directly impacted
by the project – been identified and consulted?
ACTION
Informally gauge the interest of potential investors using the concept note template below. • Engaged project developer(s): Are the project developers committed to
developing investment opportunities with a profitable business model that has
OUTPUT potential to solve the landscape issue(s)? Did these project developers provide
The concept note should be no more than two pages and should contain the following informa- written commitment to their involvement in the landscape finance effort, preferably
tion: through a Letter of Intent?
• High-level business model: What does the business model look like? Has a
Topic Action preliminary revenue model been identified?
• Investor interest: Were the first calls with investors held, and have they expressed
Project description Describe what the project is about.
an interest?
Financing need Describe why financing is required, how much is required, and how this is • Alignment with public policies: Does the project contribute to or foster the
distributed among project partners. implementation of public policies that are already in place? Are there any public
policies that may hinder project implementation?
Project partners Describe all partners involved in the project.
Project structure What is the structure of the project and how do the project partners fit into
this?
Business model How will the project generate revenue? Is the project able to generate a profit?
Investment costs What are the estimated investment costs of the project?
ESG impact Brief description, with quantitative data, of the potential ESG impact of the
project, with a focus on how the project connects to, catalyzes and/or enables • Detailed guidance on bankable project development specifically for forest
wider positive landscape impact. For example, by restoring land at scale, or producers: Boscolo, M., Lehtonen, P. and Pra, A. 2021. Developing bankable
including smallholder farmers in the value chain and providing them (new, business plans – A learning guide for forest producers and their organizations.
Forestry Working Paper No. 24. Rome, FAO.
• Examples of revenue/business models: WRI The Business of Planting Trees (2018);

EIB Investing in Nature (2019); Vrahnakis, Michael, et al. “A conceptual business
model for an agroforestry consulting company.” Agroforestry systems 90.2 (2016):
219-236.
• On risk and ESG standards: IFC performance standards.
• Blueprints: Bankable Nature Solutions, WWF (2020); Inclusive Investments in

Sustainable Land Management to Help Achieve Land Degradation Neutrality at
www.ldninsights.org. IDH as manager of the LDN TAF (2021); Coalition for Private
Investment in Conservation – Blueprints, at www.cpicfinance.com.

A Guide
SKILLS CHECK
STAGE 3
STAGE 3
At this stage, the project developer should be more
in the lead than the organizer. The project developer
should have a good understanding of business
and enterprise development, in order to develop
a detailed business model, financial projections,
Developing the business and risk planning. The project organizer will focus
more on addressing key bottlenecks that inhibit the
model, structure, potential project from launching and attracting investment.

One such role is connecting the project to the
impacts and financing impact objectives that are part of the landscape
strategy. This requires not only the skills to assess
strategy socio-economic and environmental impacts, but

also what these mean for a business developer,
including opportunities and limitations. Some
business case development skills in the project
organizer team are therefore recommended.
Before continuing engagement with potential investors identified before, or

approaching new investors with whom there has been no engagement yet,
the landscape finance project plan needs to be developed in more detail.
A clear understanding of the business model, risks, projected cash flows,
impacts, and financial structure is needed to engage investors, and for them
to properly assess whether the investment is suitable for them. In stage 3,
guidance and tools are provided to prepare quality investments for potential
investors, and on the appropriate stage to approach certain investors.
Financial
De-risking projects Impact Business and
projection and
with enablers planning impact risks
investment plan
To develop landscape finance projects that meet the expectations and requirements
of potential investors and present them to the best suited set of investors. As a project
organizer, continue to influence the design of the project in such a way that it has max-
imum positive impact on the landscape. Preparing the detailed business model, theory
of change, risk register, investment structure and financing strategy is an iterative pro-
cess that also carries over into stage 4 activities.

A Guide
STAGE 3
3.1 De-risking landscape finance Six categories of enabling projects
projects with project-specific enablers Enabling projects can be categorized into six main types, as illustrated below:
Category Enabling project Example
Awareness-raising campaigns, making target Awareness that deforestation leads to

The basic revenues of landscape finance projects were identified in stage 2. To further support Category 1
stakeholders and communities aware of issues increased risk of floods and droughts
Awareness raising
investment, enabling projects (which do not directly generate project revenues) can help to that the landscape program aims to solve
further de-risk landscape finance projects. At this stage, you can determine which enabling in-
Support in realizing or implementing regulatory Support in land formalization processes for
vestments are present or needed to de-risk the project. or policy change, such as land ownership/ farmers to gain ownership over their land,
tenure or natural resource rights which will bring more security towards their
Many emerging and frontier economies where landscape finance is relevant generally have investment
Category 2
weak business enabling environments, limiting the capital that can be raised from private in-
Policies, Anti-pollution / clean water regulation or tax Implementation of regulations for clean water
vestors. It is important that an enabling environment is established in order for investors to feel regulations, and policies to incentivize water polluters to invest in water
comfortable enough to invest. Enabling projects, which typically generate no or limited cash land rights treatment systems
flows and are often grant financed, act to improve the general investment environment.
Implementation of incentives for following a Fairtrade or organic farming premiums,
desired sustainable practice incentives for forest and biodiversity
ACTION conservation
Determine which of the following enabling projects can support the landscape finance project
and as such de-risk the project, while designing for maximum impact. The figure below illus- Fostering the implementation of landscape Support for local multi-stakeholder coalitions
Category 3 governance models with a common vision on the long-term
trates the typical enabling projects that can be implemented if needed, and in which order.
Landscape development of landscapes
governance Landscape governance pipeline Investing in the implementation of
models commitments and long-term targets under
landscape governance models
Development and operationalization of utilities Development of irrigation infrastructure for

3. 4. 6. (small-scale infrastructure) to strengthen smallholder farmers to connect to
Landscape Pilots and 5. Impact position of the project developer
governance proof Capacity measurement
2B. of concept building and monitoring Category 4
models Proof of concept through Intercrop yields and local stakeholder ability to
Policies and Pilots and
pilot project deliver
regulations proof of concept
2A. Development and operationalization Development of warehousing facilities to
Land rights of missing value chain links prevent post-harvest losses and strengthen
position of farmers
1. Training in sustainable business / farming Training of smallholder farmers in sustainable

Awareness practices / governance / forest conservation / farming practices to improve long-term farming
raising Category 5 other yields and gather lessons learned for scaling up
Capacity Building Data collection projects Data collection for smallholder lending,
insurance, impact monitoring, training and
service design
Category 6 Training in impact measurement and Training for project developer in how to create
Impact monitoring metrics that show impact to investors
measurement and Environmental and Social Impact Assessment External consultant contracted to conduct an
monitoring (ESIA) ESIA
A project organizer is typically well-positioned to decide whether and which enabling projects
are required to de-risk the landscape finance project. The project organizer should discuss
this assessment with the project developer. It is very important that this enabling project is de-
mand-driven, and that the project developer has a vested interest in making this enabling
project work.

A Guide
CASE STUDY
STAGE 3
Enhancing the resilience
of wetlands in Peru
The Datem del Marañón province in the Peruvian

Amazon is of high biodiversity value. About 25% of the
area is covered by peatlands, holding a total carbon
stock of around 3.78 billion tons of CO2e. But these
peatlands face a range of threats, including large-
scale (illegal) logging, hydrocarbon extraction and
expansion of the agricultural frontier. The project goal
is to enhance the climate resilience and livelihoods of
120 indigenous wetlands communities in Datem del
Marañón, while reducing greenhouse gas emissions
from deforestation. Strengthening private-sector
participation is key, through:
• Strengthening institutional capacity in government

organizations – facilitating better land-use planning
and management of the region’s wetlands;
• Strengthening the capacity of community-based

institutions – entrusting resource management to
indigenous communities and empowering women;
• Strengthening and expanding sustainable,

commercial bio-businesses of non-timber forest
products (78 by 2025) – incorporating solar energy
and providing sustainable economic activities;
• Developing science, technology and knowledge

management to enhance the knowledge base
through technical assistance, workshops and
training.
Challenges experienced due to lack of enabling

environment: Including indigenous people in the
management process is crucial. This involves a risk
element, as multiple ethnic groups in the area have
not been able to formalize titles to their communal
lands. They have also had experiences in the past
when they have not been adequately consulted. It is
therefore of great importance to conduct a proper
process of free and prior informed consent. Studies
suggest that this risk has not been sufficiently
mitigated, and the project lacked the required
support and endorsement as a result.

A Guide
STAGE 3
Business model development and financial projections
3.2 Financial projections and
An essential element of successfully developing landscape finance projects is to obtain solid in-
sights into the financials. Presenting a landscape finance project with a clear financial plan and
investment plan
projections – based on a business plan – will attract investor interest. The first step is to develop
a clear business model; one way to do so is presented below.
Based on the business model, financial projections can be made. The model shows how much
ACTION revenue will be generated, what activities are needed to generate this revenue, the costs of
Develop one or more versions of a “business model canvas” of the landscape finance project. these activities, key resources required, target customers, key partners, and how the product(s)
will be delivered to the market / customers.
When first preparing the business model for a landscape finance project, it is useful to develop
a business model canvas. This is a visual overview of the core business model. It describes the ACTION
basic value proposition, infrastructure, customers, and finances involved. The business model Following the high-level business model that has been created in the previous stage, a detailed
canvas is an excellent tool to ensure that project developers think about all aspects of the busi- financial model (in spreadsheet format) should be developed. The dashboard of such a model
ness model, and later serves as a quick and practical snapshot of the business model for poten- typically showcases all major input and output indicators, such as interest rate, tenor, EBITDA
tial investors. Please refer to the study developed by Joyce & Paquin (2016)3 for tips on drafting margin and IRR.
a sustainability-oriented business model canvas.
This financial model can be put together either in-house by the project developer or with the
OUTPUT help of external consultants. At this stage, this financial model does not need to be extensive
One or more versions of a business model canvas describing one or more scenarios of the busi- and can be based on assumptions, as long as these assumptions are clearly stipulated. The pro-
ness case. cess for drawing up a financial model is as follows:
Key activities Customer Step Item Metric Example

relationships
Step 1: Financial information: Annual accounts: What Usually this is
Take stock Before diving into the were the results over the a collaborative
of financial new investment plans, last three years? Was the step in which the
Key partners information collect and analyze company EBITDA positive? project developer
all available financial Is the overall trend of the and organizer work
information describing sales figures positive? together to get all
the current situation. financial data ready to
Absorption capacity: Is the process into a financial
project developer capable model.
of absorbing the funding?
Are the financial records
in good order? Can the
Value project developer answer
Key resources Proposition Channels Customers all the project organizer’s
questions?
Step 2: Products or services: Volume: How much is The volume is usually

Determine How is the investment expected to be sold? How assumed based on the
revenues expected to generate will the investment be able average yield of the
Costs Revenue income? What to deliver this volume? number of hectares
products or services minus any losses. The
will be sold? Price: At what average price price is based on local
will the products or services or international market
be sold? What is the basis of prices.
the price assumption?
3 Joyce, Alexandre, and Raymond L. Paquin. “The triple layered business model canvas: A tool to design
more sustainable business models.” Journal of cleaner production 135 (2016): 1474-1486.

A Guide
STAGE 3
Step Item Metric Example Investment plan
Step 3: Costs of goods sold COGS: Cost of input Direct costs include Stage 4 covers the detailed investment plan and the exact amount of capital that needs to be
Determine (COGS): What are materials, labor, etc. seeds, fertilizer, water, raised. It is nonetheless important to draft an investment plan at stage 3, which will then be re-
COGS the direct costs for energy and labor.
fined in stage 4.
producing the goods
sold?
ACTION 1
Step 4: Fixed operating costs FOC: Indirect fixed costs, Property taxes, Draft an investment plan through describing the investment requirement and the investment
Determine (FOC): What are the such as rent, insurance, crop insurance, schedule.
FOC indirect costs that property taxes and depreciation of
are needed to run the depreciation of assets. farm equipment and • Investment requirement: total investment costs that are required to realize the land-
operations? leasehold.
scape finance project.
Step 5: Variable operating VOC: Distribution, transport, Transportation of
Determine costs (VOC): What administration expenses, goods to market and • Investment schedule: timing of the investments that need to be made – for example,
VOC are the indirect costs maintenance and repairs. maintenance and upfront or spread over time, or a combination of both.
of operations that repairs of machinery.
fluctuate based on The type of capital to be raised typically depends on the phase the landscape finance project is
the volume that is
in, and what the capital is going to be used for.
produced or sold?
Step 6: Capital requirement: Assets: What are the main Assets: €5 million
Determine refers to all costs that costs of the assets that need to build a factory to
capital are made to implement to be procured? process cassava into
requirement the investment plans. chips.
Human resources: What are
the main costs of the human Human resources:
resources required? €100,000 for external
consultants to conduct
Costs of capital: What are
technical feasibility
the main costs of capital
study on factory
that need to be raised?
location.
Costs of capital:
Annual interest
payment of 5% on the
capital raised.
Depending on the maturity and predictability of the cash flows under the business model, pro- TIPS & TRICKS
jections of the income statement are made for a period of five-ten years. This financial model
provides useful insights into investment plans of the project developer. Since a financial model
is dynamic, it allows for easy exploration of different scenarios: what if we cut the investment Importance of ‘ticket size’
plan into two sequential parts? Does the first part have a standalone business case? Does this
Apart from the type of project an investor may finance, one of the main criteria
make it easier to raise investment since the risks are less? Answering these questions allows the
the investor may have relates to the “ticket size”, which is the amount of capital
project organizer and developer to progress to the next step of drafting an investment plan.
that can be invested in a project. Investors often have limited resources to process
investments, and therefore need to be selective. The smaller a project, the higher the
OUTPUT failure rate. More importantly, transaction costs tend to be the same if not higher for
A clear financial model providing insights into both the current financial situation and the finan-
smaller projects. A high ticket size is required to earn back the transaction costs out
cial projections based on the business model.
of the return that the project will generate. As such, investors tend to focus on larger
projects, with an investment need of between €5 million and €30 million.

A Guide
STAGE 3
ACTION 2 ACTION 3
Determine the type of capital required based on the investment need and financial projections Insert the investment requirement and investment schedule into the financial model, to check
of the landscape finance project. Questions to consider include: where is the landscape finance whether the landscape finance project can generate sufficient cash to service the debt, and to
project in terms of its maturity? What is the primary use of the capital requested? What can the see how sensitive the financial model is to risks (e.g. what happens when market prices drop
financial fundamentals of the company support? What is the cash-generating capacity to ser- by 10% or personnel costs increase by 20%). With equity, this is less of a concern as there are
vice the capital requirements? Is there a need for permanent capital? In determining the type of no fixed payments to be made. However, the existing owners will own a smaller percentage as
capital that is needed, the following capital sources may be considered: more equity is raised.
• Equity: Equity is applicable when there is a need for permanent capital, and in cases where OUTPUT
investments need to be made in capital-intensive assets that take a long period of time to A clear description of the amount of capital that is needed, when this is needed, what type of
earn back. Another possibility for equity may be to share in the ownership with a strategic capital is needed, and what this is to be used for. This will help potential investors quickly gain a
partner that can bring specific experience or skills to support the business model of the deep understanding of the financing needs of the landscape finance project. The example be-
landscape finance project. low illustrates an investment plan:
• Debt: Debt is capital used to finance an organization that is subject to payment of interest
over the life of the loan, at the end of which the loan is normally repaid. Senior debt, which is
money that a company must repay first when it goes out of business, is used for financing of Type of Debt Over the long term, the landscape finance project generates
assets or activities that generate cash flow in the short term that can service the payments capital sufficient operational cash flows to service the debt
of the loan. Raising too much or costly debt may quickly cause bankruptcy. Debt investors
Currency US$ The project is expected to generate revenues in US dollars
always provide capital with the intention of getting it back with interest. As such, it is import-
ant that the landscape finance project is able to generate sufficient operational cash flow to Amount US$ Based on investment needs and servicing capacity of the project
pay the interest as well as repaying the loan during its tenor. Tenor Long term The project is expected to generate sufficient cash flows to
(>5 years) service and repay the debt after five years, not earlier
• Generally, investment opportunities that generate positive operational cash flow can finance
Interest 5–8% Based on financial projections, the project can service an interest
up to three–five times the general annual EBITDA. This leverage, however, is highly indicative rate of 5–8%, based on the shareholders yielding a modest return
and dependent on specific characteristics of the company and sector. Potential investors will on capital of ~10%
look to the assets of the company or some other way to seek reassurance that they will get
Ranking / Security Senior No existing lenders
their money back. If the landscape finance project has a strong balance sheet (e.g. low level
of debt and high level of assets) or has the ability to provide assets as collateral, senior debt Soft conditions Grace period The project is expected to generate insufficient cash flows to
may be applicable. of 2 years make any debt repayments
• Mezzanine: If the future cash flows of the landscape finance project are more complex (e.g.
cash flows are limited during the first two years), attracting mezzanine finance may be more
3.3 Impact planning

applicable. Mezzanine is able to accept higher forms of risk compared to senior debt, and is
therefore able to offer more flexible payment terms (grace periods, longer tenor, etc.), but
with the same expectation of receiving the capital back. Furthermore, the security of mezza-
nine financing (and other forms of financing) can be further improved by project developers
who can offer offtake contracts with minimum payment terms, for example. Investors need clear insights on how a project will achieve the desired impacts in the land-
scape. A theory of change is a good tool for this purpose. The theory of change describes how
• Results-based finance (RBF): RBF is a form of debt financing used in carbon finance or fi- and why an intervention (project) is assumed to lead to a desired end-result. Often, a theory of
nance of ecosystem services. In RBF, payment obligations are not based on an interest rate, change is defined as the connection between activities and outcomes. It defines the problem
but on the realization of certain pre-agreed results. If a landscape finance project offers high that a project aims to solve, the overall objective, and the wider context. Assumptions about
environmental impact, RBF may be a suitable means of financing. behavior, causal relations and contexts are made explicit and are, as much as possible, support-
ed by evidence.
In addition, the theory of change must be coupled with certain standards such as IFC perfor-
mance standards, VCS, Plan Vivo, etc. that can help ensure the impact is delivered and justified.

A Guide
CASE STUDY
STAGE 3
Connecting investment in a
Zambian cane sugar grower to
facilitate a shift to climate-smart
practices that deliver at
a landscape level
The towns of Kafue and Mazabuka are a densely

populated region that is of major, industrial, ecological,
and socio-economic significance for Zambia. The Kafue
Flats is estimated to directly support the livelihoods
of more than 2 million people and the Kafue River also
supports and sustains vital environmental systems
like wetlands, national parks, and bird sanctuaries. But
over-abstraction of water and more severe droughts
because of climate change are threatening this important
economic region and ecosystem.
The sugarcane cooperative Kaleya Smallholders

Company Limited (KASCOL) is seeking to replace its
current irrigation system of furrows with drip irrigation to
improve the climate resilience of the sugar cane fields.
With the better management of water and the conversion
of existing fields to drip irrigation, the cooperative can
improve its economic resilience and ensure that the
investment will pay itself back within two years.
Financing this landscape intervention requires a loan of

up to €5 million. However, to be considered investable
for most impact investors, such as the Dutch Fund for
Climate and Investment (DFCD), KASCOL will first need to
conduct the necessary environmental, social, technical,
and financial assessments. These studies will also build
off regional data and resources to understand the water
availability in the region and how it can be best allocated.
One of the key outputs of the development stage will be
to develop the tender to select the installation company
for the drip irrigation. Grant and Technical Assistance
from the DFCD Origination Facility is currently being
provided by WWF to support this project, and the
landscape, to ensure that it gets to a stage where it can
receive investment from commercial investors.

A Guide
STAGE 3
ACTION
Develop a theory of change behind the investment plan and select the most appropriate impact
3.4 Business and impact risks
standards. Appendix I provides a step-by-step explanation of how a theory of change should be
developed.
Project developers can significantly enhance the quality of their investment opportunities by
OUTPUT setting up a detailed risk management system (RMS), which allows the potential investor to
An overview of the various elements that a theory of change should cover is presented below. get a clear insight into the risks that are associated with the investment, how this may impact
The project organizer or developer should start by drafting all the elements for the targeted the investment, how risks are mitigated and, if they do occur, how they are managed. Getting
landscape finance project. Most often, the problem statement is at a landscape level (e.g. in- clear insights into the business and impact risks improves investor confidence. One example is
creasing erosion causing drought). currency risk – i.e. the losses that an international financial transaction may incur due to fluctu-
ations between the currency of the investment (often hard currency such as US dollars) and the
currency in which revenues are generated (often soft currency such as Kenyan shilling).
A clear risk mitigation plan is a tool to gain investor confidence in your ability to identify, man-
Element Description
age and mitigate risks. In many landscape investments, the risk/return ratio is perceived as too
risky. Coupled with a lack of proven experience in developing successful (scalable) landscape
Problem What we want to solve: the problem statement describes the problem, why it is a
statement problem (including root causes), and whom it affects. investments (investors cannot use their own risk assessment tools), this limits investors. A clear
overview of the business and impact risks is therefore relevant in the field of landscape finance,
Context The situation in which the project takes place, including stakeholders, power which is relatively new for most investors.
relations, other relevant projects, etc.
ACTION
Inputs What will be used: resources required for a project, program or policy (funding,
Develop a risk register of the investment plan. A risk register is a commonly used tool in many
staffing, equipment, curriculum materials, etc.).
financial institutions that allows for efficient and comprehensive mapping of potential risks that
Activities / What will be done: activities can be expressed by a verb (“market”, “provide”,
may impact the business. It also helps project developers in strengthening their business case.
interventions “facilitate”, “deliver”). For example, if there is a high drought risk, project developers could mitigate this with climate
insurance. Or if there is a market risk, they could mitigate it by contracting an offtaker at a pre-
Outputs What will be produced: outputs are the tangible products as a result of the determined price.
activities. They are usually expressed as nouns, are tangible and can be counted
(e.g. 15 training sessions, five market entry activities, 20 technical assistance
missions).
Outcomes What will be achieved: outcomes are the behavioral changes that result from the
project outputs (e.g. giving up smoking, providing boiling water, using bed nets).
Outcomes can be increased, decreased, enhanced, improved or maintained.
Impact Why we do it: long-term changes are the results that derive from an accumulation
of outcomes. These can be similar to strategic objectives.
Assumptions Assumptions are the necessary conditions for change, or the underlying
conditions or resources that need to exist for planned change to occur.
Unintended A theory of change describes the theory behind realizing positive impact, but
negative positive intended actions can also result in negative results. These are identified as
consequences unintended negative consequences.

A Guide
CASE STUDY
STAGE 3
Investing in Coffee
Agroforestry in Peru
An example of a project that ticks all boxes of the checklist

for stage 4, and as such has been able to overcome typical
landscape finance barriers addressed in stage 3, is the Café
Selva Norte by non-profit organization ECOTIERRA in Peru.
The US$14.5 million project is financed through the URA-
PI Sustainable Land Use Vehicle which received a capital
injection from the Land Degradation Neutrality (LDN) Fund
and Technical Assistance from the LDN Technical Assistance
Facility (TAF) managed by IDH.
The URAPI vehicle, managed by ECOTIERRA, is a good

example of a mechanism that enables financing of several
activities in this landscape project, and which allowed an
international impact investment fund such as the LDN Fund
to participate at their preferred ticket size. Through this
vehicle long-term financing with a 15- year investment stra-
tegy is provided with up to two one-year extensions. URAPI
provides debt to farmers’ cooperatives whereas equity is
directly invested in the processing plant. The cooperatives
also own shares from the processing plant from the start.
URAPI’s exit strategy is to gradually transfer 100% of the FIGURE 5. Flow of finance and services
processing plant’s ownership rights to the cooperatives and
have the carbon credits paid for. Financial returns are being LEGEND
generated by providing commercially viable activities and E Equity LDN Fund LDN TAF*
strengthening the economic models of cooperatives. More
specifically, returns arise from: Div Dividend
D
I+P
D Debt
• Sales of coffee and timber – improved agricultural Urapi Sustainable Land Use Vehicle
I Interest
systems leading to increased productivity and quality
of coffee, against a premium through the Eleva Finca P Principal D
I+P
certificate. Timber revenues will be generated later in the
TA Technical
project; Assistance InvEcotierra
Farmers’ Cooperatives
(carbon manager)
• Processing plant - fees for delivering processing and VCU Verified Carbon
commercialization services to cooperatives; Units (VCU)
• Avoided carbon emissions – monetizing the positive

environmental impacts of newly planted forests through PROJECT VCU
carbon credits.
© Guillaume Nadeau
Processing plant Coﬀee Agroforestry Carbon Credits

A Guide
STAGE 3
Risk register
A risk register tool provides a comprehensive overview of the business risks, how these risks
impact the business, and how risks will be managed. A risk register can be developed by cover-
ing the sections below:
Section Description
Description Provide a short description of the risks that may negatively impact the business,
of risk such as pollution, no supply of input materials, shutdown of marketing channel,
droughts, strikes, power cuts, theft, wildfire, etc.
Impact of the Provide a description of what effect the risk will have on the business if it is not ADDITIONAL RESOURCES
risk on the mitigated or eliminated. For example: droughts will likely decimate the harvest;
business shutdown of a marketing channel will limit the earning potential of the business.
Impact level What is the level of impact on the business? Provide a rating from 1 (low) to 5
• For a broader set of examples of how finance can be aligned with landscape goals
(high).
(beyond project development for impact investors): Global Canopy Little Book on
Probability What is the probability that the risk occurs? Provide a rating from 1 (low) to 5 Investing in Nature (2020).
(high).
• For drafting a business model canvas: Joyce, Alexandre, and Raymond L. Paquin.
Priority level Based on the scoring of the impact level and probability, the risk tool will calcu- “The triple layered business model canvas: A tool to design more sustainable
late the priority level of the risk. business models.” Journal of cleaner production 135 (2016): 1474-1486.
Control and Provide a short explanation of how the risk will be mitigated.
• For examples of how to look at nature or landscapes as investment opportunities:
mitigation
strategy WRI and TNC the Business of Planting Trees; EIB Investing in Nature, Financing
Conservation and Nature-based Solutions.
Impact level What is the level of impact on the business after the control and mitigation strat-
(after mitigation) egy has been put in place? Provide a rating from 1 (low) to 5 (high).
Probability What is the probability that the risk occurs after the control and mitigation strat-
(after mitigation) egy has been put in place? Provide a rating from 1 (low) to 5 (high).
Priority level Based on the scoring of the new impact level and probability, the risk tool will
(after mitigation) calculate the priority level of the risk.
Disaster If the control and mitigation strategy proves insufficient and disaster strikes,
management how will the situation be managed?
Owner Identify who will be responsible for managing the risk.
Date Indicate date of risk review.
OUTPUT
A clear risk register that the project organizer and developer can take to potential investors.

A Guide
STAGE 3
FIGURE 7. An example of an extract of such a risk register is provided below
CHECKLIST
BEFORE CONTROLS AFTER MITIGATION

Final checklist before moving to the
Risk Risk Impact Impact Probability Priority Controls Or Impact Probability Priority Disaster Owner Date To Be next stage
Id Description Description Level Level Level Mitigation Level Level Level Management Reviewed
No. Return potential: What commercial investments

Description Effects if the Rate 1 Rate 1 (IMPACT X How will could be developed? How will such investments
Rate 1 Rate 1 (IMPACT X How will Who is 00/00/00
of the risk risk is not (LOW) to (LOW) to PROBABILITY) risk be (LOW) (LOW) to 5 PROBABILITY) situation be responsible? generate revenues?
mitigated or 5 (HIGH) 5 (HIGH) Address the mitigated? to 5 (HIGH) Address the managed if
eliminated highest first (HIGH) highest first risk occurs?
 Risks: What are the main risks of these commercial
investments? How will risks be mitigated? Have any
1 Drought Crop / 4 3 12 Project will risks been identified that can’t be mitigated?
2 3 6 Assist Smallholder 1/1/2021
harvest will seek to install smallholders farmer &
go to waste irrigation  In case of enabling projects: The activities of the
in livelihoods, implementation
systems or develop LT agency investment are clearly understood, and there is
ensure crop recovery plan sufficient probability that the activities will result in
insurance
the desired enabling environment.
2 Product Produce 3 3 9 Project will 2 1 2 Project Sales

 In case of cash flow-generating investment: The
marketing does not seek to will seek department / activities of the investment are clearly understood,
risk find an contract an alternative manager and have been generating a consistent or growing
offtaker in off-taker and marketing
time pre-agreed revenue stream for the past three years (cash flow-
channels
pricing positive revenue model for the potential investor).
 Capital need: A clear capital need has been

established with an investment plan.
YELLOW medium risk GREEN low risk
 Financial projections: Financial projections are
available to determine the risk and potential return of
the investment.
 Track record of project developer: The management

has a relevant background and/or education in the
field in which the investment is active.
 Ownership: Ownership of the company is held by

local project developer.
 Impact: Clear description of the impact potential in a

theory of change.
If an investment meets these criteria, it is entered on the

shortlist which is discussed
in the next stage.

A Guide
STAGE 4
STAGE 4 At this point in the process, the lead in the financing process shifts from the
project organizer to the project developer, which may be supported by its
Structuring the deal and treasury department and/or by an external financial advisor. During this part
of the process, a clear understanding should be created of the following ele-
engaging investment ments of the project:
managers • Business model – how will the landscape finance project generate revenue, and
when will the business model break even?
• Funding sources – what are other (existing) sources of funding to the project,
and which subsidies exist?
• Transaction partner and risk share – who is going to manage the investment,
and what level of risk do they take? If there is an on-lending component (e.g. to
farmers or cooperatives), who is going to manage the loan portfolio, and is the
company willing/able to take the loan portfolio on its balance sheet? What is the
capacity to do this? If no internal capacity, who else can do this?
• Structure – who are the project developers and how will they cooperate with
each other?
• ESG screening – does the potential investment meet basic ESG screening
criteria commonly applied by impact investors, such as the IFC performance
standards, as well as specific ESG screening criteria of the targeted investors?
(Impact funds often make their ESG screening criteria publicly available on their
websites).
• Impact – what is the projected impact, how will impact be generated, and what
are the risks? Does the project’s impact align with the impact criteria of the tar-
geted investor?
• Financial track record and projections – what is the financial track record of the
company, and what are the projections of future financial outcomes?
• Risks and mitigating actions – what are the risks that can impact the financial
projections and how can they be they mitigated?
• Capital requirement – how much capital is required and when?
• Tenor – based on the projected cash flows of the project, what is the required
tenor (time period) of the loan?
© doan tuan

A Guide
STAGE 4
• Grace period – based on the projected cash flows, does the project need a grace period
(period of time at the beginning of the loan during which no interest and/or repayments
4.1 Investment structuring and term
are made)? A grace period is usually required if there is a lack of cash flow during a peri-
od of time, such as when an orchard is replanted and only starts producing after a num-
sheet
ber of years.
• Scale – how will scale be achieved and what are the barriers to scaling up? Assuming that all relevant investment procedures with the investor are followed and they are
interested in investing, the investment structuring process begins. The investor will share a pre-
• Synergies and competition – what are the possible synergies with other organizations liminary term sheet, which is an initial offer of the terms and conditions of the financing that the
and initiatives, and who are the main competitors for the business model proposed? investor is willing to provide. Following further investigation (due diligence) by the investor and
discussions, the term sheet will be negotiated.
Important: It’s not always necessary for all these criteria to be fully in place. When a project is
at this stage, it is a good moment to start discussing the possibilities with potential investors, ACTION
some of which may even be able to provide pre-investment technical assistance through inte- The investor develops a term sheet to which the project developer can respond, with all their
grated or linked facilities, to help the project make the final stretch towards a successful deal. targets in mind, and prioritize which terms and conditions are most important
Once the landscape finance project is fully developed into an investment opportunity,4 project The preliminary term sheet details the pricing and conditions of the financing that the investor
developers and organizers can start to engage with potential investors. Typically, this is a pro- is willing to offer. During the investment process, the term sheet serves as a tool to negotiate
cess in which high-level information is initially shared, followed by more detailed due diligence the terms and conditions of the deal. Furthermore, the final term sheet serves as input for the
by the investor(s). The deal is also negotiated and further structured. The work done in stage 3 final investment agreement. Term sheets can be very elaborate, but also very simple.
is very important here, since this information impacts the negotiation and deal-structuring pro-
cess. OUTPUT
A preliminary term sheet that is agreeable to all parties involved. The most basic terms and con-
ditions and their negotiation considerations include:
To find interested investor(s), to negotiate a deal structure with them that meets both the
project’s and the investor’s needs, and to close the investment deal.
Investment Identification of Closing the

Deal structuring
structuring and alternative deal: financial
and negotiations
term sheet investors if needed close
4 This toolkit assumes that a landscape finance project turns into an investment opportunity when all the pre-
ceding steps have been followed, and all required outputs are ready to share with potential investors. For the
sake of clarity, this toolkit will continue with the term “landscape finance project” instead of “investment oppor-
tunity”, but in stage 4 these terms can be used interchangeably.

A Guide
CASE STUDY
Supporting the Büyük

Menderes River Basin
Landscape in Turkey through
Investment
A successful landscape investment program has been set

up in the Büyük Menderes River basin in southwestern
Turkey, that is a good example of connecting bank financing
to landscape goals. Historically, the textile manufacturing
industry in this region caused severe water pollution,
threatening flora and fauna and local livelihoods. As such,
a landscape finance facility supports a group of small and
medium-sized textile (dying) companies to adopt cleaner
production processes that use less water, chemicals and
energy and reduce solid waste and wastewater. These
interventions range from small alterations such as changes
in chemicals and improved water management, to large
investments in equipment. Investing in ‘’grey infrastructure’’
helps to minimize the impact of the industry on ‘’green
infrastructure’’, i.e., freshwater resources and the health of
the basin.
Among others through initial pre-investment support by WWF,

participating banks enabled disbursement of loans worth
€3.6-8 million - €90-200k per facility - for cleaner production
FIGURE 8. Flow of finance and services
processes. Seven textile manufacturing companies have
LEGEND since already invested €6.5 million in cleaner production
methods and 12 other producers are committed to invest
Public Funding Buyers / brands Investors (e.g. local bank)
G Grant an additional €3 million. The business model is built upon
cleaner production processes that help to lower cost of
D Debt G G D production and sustain the business, e.g. compliance with
I+P
environmental legislation and regulations, alignment with the
I Interest
Feasibility studies Textile manufacturers demands of international brands, and increased brand value.
P Principal Financial returns are specifically generated through:
D I+P • Reducing the use of water (1.5 million cubic meters),

chemicals and energy – cutting production costs.
PROJECT
Feasibility studies point out that the interventions resulted in
Cleaner production methods – reducing use of resources significant savings –€4-10 million/year through an investment
of €5-12 million - with payback periods ranging from six
months to two years.
© WWF-Turkey

A Guide
STAGE 4
Terms and Considerations Blended finance
conditions
In some cases, it may prove difficult to raise financing from a single commercial source. In these
Currency Financing is best raised in the currency in which revenues are received. If another instances, the business may be perceived as too risky compared to the return that can be gen-
currency is used, the company runs the risk that the debt will increase if the currency
erated. Raising capital from a combination of commercial and concessional capital investors
devalues (often the case in emerging markets when financing is extended in US
may be a solution here. Unlike commercial investors, concessional investors can take on more
dollars).
risk and provide more risky financing terms, such as tenor extension or subordination (junior
Amount Negotiated amount that is needed and can be served during the tenor of the loan. loans), thereby improving the risk profile of the commercial investor. Concessional finance, in
combination with commercial finance, is called “blended finance”.
Purpose Description of what the funding can be used for.
ACTION
Interest Price of the financing that is provided, highly dependent on the risk profile. Together Investigate whether blended finance is necessary, and how financing can be blended.
rate or with the payment terms, you should consider whether the landscape finance project
dividends can generate sufficient cash flow to service these.
If business models are unable to service commercial levels of financing, funding the project
Tenor Period that the loan will be outstanding, which should be aligned with the ability of through a combination of commercial and concessional financing may be a better approach.
the landscape finance project to repay the loan plus interest. Concessional financing is invested to align the risk profile of the commercial financier with the
risk-adjusted market rate of return. Various types of concessional finance exist, and each serve a
Amortization How the loan will be paid back, which can be structured in a linear, amortized or different purpose:
bullet (full payment at the end of tenor) manner. Earlier payments mean that cash
flow capital is taken out of the company.
• Grants – are used for investments in assets or activities that do not generate a return on
capital but are key to the success of the landscape finance project. Typically, these are
Grace Period of time during which no interest or repayments have to be made on the
period financing due to lack of cash flow generation by the project during this time. enabling investments, such as training of farmers.
Ranking How the finance will rank against other existing forms of finance, and against any • Guarantees – are used to generate creditworthiness, so that another lender is willing to
future finance that the company may attract. Typically, the company may not take extend financing. Guarantees are often extended by highly creditworthy companies or
on new financing that is more senior without the prior consent of the existing senior institutions, thereby lowering the cost of financing.
lenders. In case of bankruptcy, senior lenders are the first to get repaid out of the
liquidated assets, and as such are protective of their senior position.
• Junior debt – is a type of debt financing that ranks behind senior debt in case of bank-
Covenants Standards and activities that the company is required to uphold, usually associated ruptcy. It can take on higher risk, often accompanied by higher costs.
with maintaining the quality of the company’s financials. If covenants are too
restrictive, this may result in the project developer not able to uphold them, and the • Equipment finance or leasing – is used when a loan is secured against a specific asset,
financier enforcing early repayment of the loan. which can serve as collateral and be seized in case of non-payments.
Conditions Certain conditions that the landscape finance project must meet before the financier
OUTPUT
precedent transfers funds. These typically include approval from local authorities or the central
bank, or the provision of collateral as security to the loan, in the form cash or assets.
Proposal for blended finance structure and identification of potential sources of concessional
capital.
Events of Formulation of events of default which, in addition to non-payments, may include
default issues such as misrepresentation, unlawfulness, etc.
Fees Financiers typically charge fees for extending financing. These are generally
administrative and maintenance fees, which are charged for extending the finance
and monitoring the performance of the company respectively.
Governing In case of any disputes, which law is applicable and the location of the court.
law and
jurisdiction

A Guide
STAGE 4
4.2 Dynamics of deal structuring
and negotiations
Engaging with investors to structure a deal is not a straightforward process, and involves negoti- OUTPUT
ations and problem solving. Investors and investees often have differing opinions, which means A well-prepared strategy for deal structuring and negotiations, including a clear risk-mitigation
negotiations are required to reach a mutual understanding. strategy. Anticipate all challenging questions that could be asked about the investment plan.
ACTION
The project organizer and developer should prepare for deal structuring and negotiations.
During the process of negotiating, challenges may come forward that need to be resolved –
many of which are about limiting the risk exposure of the investor. A non-exhaustive overview of
challenges and possible solutions or responses are presented in the table below:
Challenge Solution / response
The investor is not willing to provide Check whether the project developer is able to
the full ticket size without capital participate with capital or seek an additional (local or
participation of the project developer. international) investor that is willing to fund the remainder
of the investment ticket.
Investigate whether certain parts of the project can

be financed with higher risk sources of capital such as
grants, equity or junior debt.
The investment ask is for equity, but the Using the financial model, check whether the landscape
investor is only willing to provide long- finance project is able to service the debt obligations
term debt. during the tenor of the loan.
The proposed terms and conditions of Consider revising the business model by downscaling,
the investor do not meet the investment and/or removing some operational costs.
needs (e.g. the project is not able to
service the debt).
The investor seeks additional security Additional collateral can be provided in the form of
in the form of collateral, guarantees or assets (cash, property, equipment, vehicles, inventory,
insurance. debentures), personal guarantees or anything else that is
liquid and of value.
Check whether insurance can be taken out to decrease

the risk of the investor. Costs of insurance should be
lower than the decrease in cost of debt.
The investor seeks additional security Check whether the project developer or a supply chain
from the project developer. partner is willing to provide supply or offtake agreements
with fixed volume and pricing in order to ensure future
cash flows.
The investor values the landscape Discuss how the investor determined the valuation, and
finance project at a lower amount and ensure that the investor has a correct understanding of
seeks a larger ownership percentage the business model. Furthermore, check the assumptions
(shareholding). that were used and discuss the fairness of the
assumptions.

A Guide
4.3 Identification of alternative
investors if needed
The design of the landscape finance project may not sufficiently comply with the investment The maturity of an investment depends on two factors: revenues and runtime of the project.
requirements of a target investor, or an investor may be unable to finance the full investment The following overview illustrates the four development phases of landscape investments. The
ticket. In these cases, new or additional capital sources need to be identified. Investors typically financial figures in the overview are illustrative for investments that aim to grow from small-scale
invest in companies depending on the level of maturity and ticket size. development towards large-scale operations.
ACTION
Identify potential alternative investors that fit the maturity and ticket size of the landscape
finance project.
FIGURE 9. Overview of typical financing environment for landscape investment at four phases
Time
Development phase Early phase Growth phase Mature phase

Institutional capital
Public and philanthropic capital Public and philanthropic capital; Later stage impact investors,
early stage impact investors; corporates and DFIs
corporates >US$ 50 m
~US$
15–30 m
Revenue
Capital required
~US$200,000–10 m
~US$50–200,000 ~US$
5-10 m
~US$
2-5 m
Grants for project and pipeline

development, feasibility studies, High risk seed capital, Growth capital, short- and Mature equity,
pilots concessional finance long-term debt short- and long-term debt
IDH and WWF &Green, FMO, CDC, Mirova (e.g. International and local
Farmfit Fund, LDN Fund), Rabobank pension funds,
DFCD, ABC (e.g. AGRI3) insurers, banks
Livelihoods Fund,
Acre, MoMo4C

A Guide
STAGE 4
The environment of capital providers in landscape investing for enabling projects and cash
flow-generating investments is detailed in the following overview. Governments, donors (foreign
4.4 Bringing landscape finance projects
governments), and in some cases philanthropic capital (private donations) tend to focus on in-
vestments that are for the public good or generate public / widespread economic value. Where-
to financial close
as capital that originates from private sources or is earmarked to generate risk-adjusted returns
is focused on making investments in private companies.
The final step is to bring the landscape finance project to financial close, in which all documen-
tation has been executed and drawdowns of loans are permissible, or equity has been injected.
ENABLING INVESTMENTS CASH FLOW-GENERATING INVESTMENTS

ACTION
Bring the landscape finance project to financial close, which involves executing all documenta-
tion.
Investor(s) Government Donors/ Philanthropy/ Private- Impact Banks and Institutional
philanthropy high-risk sector investors/DFIs insurance and private
capital companies equity
OUTPUT
Signed agreements of the financial arrangements.
Vehicle Projects, NGOs, Small Capital (Concessional) Senior Risk-adjusted
policy, research businesses and expenditure, capital financial return on
campaigns and policy intermediaries, R&D investments products capital
institutions pilot projects
Mechanism Public Grants: Enterprise Purchase of Impact Loans Large CHECKLIST

expenditure: organizations philanthropy capital assets investment via secured investments
infrastructure, and policy grants and and working guarantees, against via equity or
fiscal reform, development, seed funding: capital equity and assets loans
regulatory institutional high-risk pilot finance loans and crop
reform, reform projects insurance
By the end of stage 4, the deal has been structured and investment managers have
subsidies been engaged. This means that the project developer, project organizer and invest-
ment manager are in an intensive process of screening, due diligence, answering
Output Public goods Private investments detailed questions, discussing the implications of different scenarios on the business
case, and negotiating the terms and conditions of the financial agreement.
Generally speaking, this is a lengthy and iterative process taking somewhere between
three and 24 months. With this toolkit, a project organizer should be well-equipped to
OUTPUT go from ideation to investment-readiness of landscape finance projects. If information
List of alternative investors that can be brought in to support the deal structuring and negotia- describing the landscape finance project is missing during the due diligence phase,
tions with the investors with which discussions are ongoing. you can go back to the relevant stage in this toolkit to find the gap in information.
FOR EXAMPLES OF SUCCESSFUL INVESTMENTS IN LANDSCAPE FINANCE PROJECTS, VISIT:

• WWF’s Bankable Nature Solutions blueprint book
• The IDH Landscape Finance website

A Guide
Appendix I: STEP 1 PROBLEM DESCRIPTION
Developing a theory of change In developing a landscape finance project, it is important to have a clear understanding of
the need for it.
Key points: how to develop a theory of change In defining the problem, the following questions should be asked:
1. Define the problem, including the root causes and stakeholders What is the problem that needs to be addressed? Who is the target group? What is the scope
2. Define the desired end-goal of the problem? What are the root causes? Who are the main stakeholders?
3. Define long- and short-term results needed to achieve the desired end-goal
4. Map activities that could lead to the short- and long-term results To keep a clear overview of the problem description, an overview can be made in the follow-
5. Identify the main assumptions: how valid or uncertain are they? ing table that includes an example.
6. Identify unintended negative consequences
7. Write narrative
What are the main problems What is the direct effect of What is the long-term
in the landscape? these problems in the impact on the landscape?
landscape?
Climate change due to Less wildlife Loss of tourism and income,

deforestation which affects livelihoods
Increased flood risk and soil Loss of arable land, which leads
erosion to demand for new farmland
Loss of arable land Unsustainable farming and lower

income, which lead to demand
for new farmland
STEP 2 DEFINING THE DESIRED IMPACT
The impact goals of the investment are defined by answering the following questions:
• What is the end-goal that the investment aims to contribute to?

• What needs to be changed in order to solve the problem?
• When will the investment be considered a success?
• Who should benefit from the end-goal?
• When defining the end-goal, what conditions need to be in place to achieve it?
These conditions can serve as sub-results that need to be achieved first before the
end-goal can be reached.

A Guide
STEP 3 DEFINING LONG- AND SHORT-TERM RESULTS NEEDED TO ACHIEVE STEP 4 DEFINING THE INPUTS AND ACTIVITIES OR INTERVENTIONS
THE END-GOAL
Once the short- and long-term results have been defined, you can start defining the
After the problem and end-goal have been defined, the long-term and short-term results activities that are needed to achieve those results. The inputs, activities or interventions can
that are needed to achieve that goal are defined. In other words, what needs to change be determined by answering the following questions:
in order to achieve the end-goal? Who and what can be influenced in order to achieve
change? • What are the current constraints of landscape actors implementing these activities
without external resources? (e.g. lack of market access, lack of capital, knowledge
The relationships between the different (sub) results and the problem statement will contain restrictions, etc.)
a number of assumptions. Making these assumptions explicit helps you to understand and
clarify why and how interventions are expected to work. During the implementation, moni- • Which activities or interventions can solve the landscape problems? (e.g. sustainable
toring these assumptions helps you understand why something works or not. Assumptions agriculture, training in sustainable farming practices, united farmers in farmer
are always time- and context-specific: often you might not be aware at the beginning that associations, obtaining Fairtrade certification, etc.)
they do not hold true everywhere.
• What inputs would be required to successfully deliver these activities? (e.g. labor, capital,
It is therefore important to make these assumptions explicit, so that you can check later technical assistance / consultancy, sustainable farm inputs, etc.)
whether they are valid. The figure below shows an example of a set of assumptions and their
place within a theory of change:
STEP 5 IDENTIFY AND VALIDATE MAIN ASSUMPTIONS

Output Outcome/Impact
Number of hectares Reduction in The assumptions are the “theories”, not facts, behind the working of the theory of change.
sustainably farmed deforestation rate
In order to strengthen the theory of change, these assumptions require validation. Firstly,
the assumptions that are critical to success should be prioritized for validation. Subsequent-
ly, the assumptions should be validated as much as possible based on experiences, empiri-
cal evidence, case studies, literature, scientific evidence, etc.
Assumptions
• Sustainable farming will result in less soils degradation
• Farmers are able to farm their land for longer periods of time
• As such, there is no need to clear forest to gain new farmland
STEP 6 IDENTIFY UNINTENDED NEGATIVE CONSEQUENCES
Assumptions Summarize the potential unintended negative consequences the activities / interventions
may result in. Describe the negative outcomes of activities: for example, an investment in
There are three types of assumptions here: sustainable agriculture to fight deforestation may result in higher demand for products,
which could actually increase the rate of deforestation unintentionally.
1. Causal links between outcomes at different levels – e.g. sustainable farming prac-
tices will enable long-term farming and therefore reduce the need to gain new
farmland by cutting down forest;
2. Drivers behind a change – e.g. agroforestry is the best sustainable farming practice STEP 7 WRITE NARRATIVE
in comparison with forestry;
Describe the pathways of how the input and activities will lead to the desired impact.
3. Context in which the project will operate – e.g. local government is supportive in
Describe the context in which the investment will take place, including the relationships
realizing landownership for smallholder farmers.
with relevant stakeholders in the landscape.

A Guide
THEORY OF CHANGE CASE STUDY: CAFÉ SELVA NORTE
Problem and causes Impact

Coffee cooperatives in the Amazonas and Cajamarca regions in Peru face significant barri- • Improved income of rural communities leads to improved rural livelihoods as more
ers to realize sustainable growth. There is a lack of availability of processing facilities, and income will be available to spend on food, education, housing, healthcare, etc.; this is
there are limited resources available to invest in the required infrastructure to ensure quality mainly covered under SDG 1.
and traceability. In addition, thousands of hectares of coffee plantations are underutilized or • Agroforestry systems lead to more sustainable production (and subsequent consump-
degraded, and similar numbers are unprofitable. Farmers are poorly protected against the tion) of coffee; this is covered under SDG 12.
effects of climate change, and have limited means to rectify this. • Agroforestry systems sequestrate and avoid CO2 emissions; this benefit to the climate is
covered under SDG 13.
Problem statement
The loss of productive land leads to continuous deforestation, soil erosion and loss of in-
come. Theory of change overview
Input How? What? Goal

Capital, capacity building, consultancy
Activities
• Providing micro-credit and technical assistance for changing land use to sustainable, Input Activities Output Outcomes Impact
productive coffee agroforestry systems, forest protection and large-scale tree planting
activities. • Capital • Financing of • Number of • Decrease • SDG 1: No
transition hectares in hectares poverty –
• Capacity
• Strengthening and professionalizing the value chain – capacity building, setting up a towards transformed of Improved rural
building
local Q-grading laboratory and state-of-the-art dry processing mill, and developing mar- agroforestry to deforested livelihoods
• Consultancy agroforestry lands
keting tools to improve quality, traceability and marketing positioning. • Technical • SDG 12:
assistance • Coffee • Improved Sustainable
• Development of new business models to diversify revenue streams through climate in pricing farmer consumption
finance and strong monitoring systems – securitizing and trading carbon credits gener- agroforestry income and production
• Coffee
ated by the regeneration of degraded land through agroforestry systems and forest pro- • Strengthe- yields • Avoided • SDG 13:
tection. ning value • Carbon carbon Climate action
chain emissions
credits • SDG 15: Life on
Outputs • Develop- • Income land
The issue is unsustainable coffee farming, which can be resolved by facilitating and financ- ment of new from
ing the transition toward agroforestry. In this case, a clear performance indicator is the num- business carbon
ber hectares transformed into agroforestry. Sustainable / agroforestry farming practices models credits
should result in improved yields. Furthermore, the project aims to improve the quality of the
coffee, which should translate into higher coffee prices. Carbon credits should form a new
measurable source of income as well.
Outcomes
Unintended negative consequences
The transformation to agroforestry production systems should lead to more sustainable • Due to the improved quality of coffee, the demand for Café Selva Norte coffee increases,
farming systems, without the need to deforest new plots of land. Furthermore, sustainable which results in an increased deforestation rate.
farming practices and value chain quality should lead to higher crop yields, quality, and • As a consequence of the demand for coffee, demand for labor also grows. The increase
income diversification through carbon credits. These three elements together should result in population puts more pressure on the local ecosystem, which results in environmental
in improved farmer income. pollution.

A Guide
Appendix II:
Assessing external resources required
The process of engaging and organizing stakeholders is often best self-managed, as this allows Types of external resources
you to get to know the market and build relationships. However, research components, such as
the identification of stakeholders, can be outsourced to external parties to speed-up the pro- There are various external parties that may have the expertise required to source investment
cess or where there is a lack of expertise. The following section covers when and how to hire opportunities:
external resources.
• Consultants in market research
External resources • Private equity managers or investors

• Investment advisors
Occasionally, organizations find themselves in a situation where they lack the experience and/
• Corporate finance advisors
or capacity to perform a specific task. In these cases, external resources or consultants can be
very helpful – allowing rapid expansion of an organization’s capacity and expertise. External • Accounting firms
resources are often more costly compared to internal resources, so hiring external expertise • Local financial institutions, such as banks, assets managers, etc.
should be carefully considered. The following decision tree provides guidance to project devel-
opers considering hiring external resources.
Clear formulation of assignment
When hiring external resources, their involvement with the organization is limited to delivering
on a specific task. It is therefore important to have a very clear and specific description of the
How much capacity
assignment. This is to ensure that the external consultant can:
does the organization Sufficient
Use internal
have for sourcing resources • Compile a team with the relevant expertise;
investments?
• Start the assignment quickly;
Short • Deliver the support and output sought by the organization;

term Hire external
• Provide an accurate cost estimate and avoid budget overruns.
What is the experien- Experienced resources
How quickly are
ce of the organization Little investment
in sourcing invest-
Not opportunities needed?
ment opportunities? experienced
Use internal
Long
resources
term
Yes
Required sourcing Can the organization
capacity for invest- develop investment Hire external
ments: sourcing experience? resources
No
• Local network in the
landscape
• Market scoping experience
• Knowledge and experience

in (project) finance, banking
and/or (impact) investment

A Guide
Appendix III:
Outsourcing origination to
Financial Advisory Services (FAS)
When deciding to outsource support on deal sourcing to FAS providers, the following steps are 3. Manage the pool of FAS providers: One investment officer should be the appointed as con-
a useful starting point: tact person and manager of the pool of FAS providers. On average, the management of a
pool of FAS providers requires 0.5 FTE.
1. Set up a catalytic facility: Financing of FAS providers can be done through the establish-
ment of a catalytic facility to raise sufficient funds. The total budget of a catalytic facility is
largely dependent on local consulting fees. Assuming an effort of 100 hours per successful
project, and assuming 10 projects at the various stages, a total facility budget of US$25– Donors
50,000 is estimated to be sufficient, and should give service providers a profitable business
case. Depending on the local context, a facility budget can be generated based on the Provides
following example. In determining an hourly rate, it is reasonable if this is higher than the grant
funding
normal hourly rate of the consultant, to compensate for the risk to the consultant.
Catalytic facility
Pays retainer
Provides
and success
supervision
Project stage Stage Hours of effort Hourly rate Number of Total fees
success fee projects
Stage 1 US$100 1–4 hours US$25–100 30 US$3,000

Organization FAS providers
Stage 2 US$2,000 20–40 hours US$50–100 6 US$12,000 Sources
deals
Stage 3: Final US$10,000 100–200 hours US$50–100 3 US$30,000
Total US$45,000
2. Recruit FAS providers: FAS providers need to go through a selection procedure before
they are included in the pool. This selection procedure consists of CV screening and an
exam taken at the premises of the organization. An FAS provider is expected to attend the
quarterly training and a monthly online deal flow meeting. After the third absence at these
events, the FAS provider risks having their access to the pool cancelled, which means they
are no longer allowed to participate.

A Guide
CONTACT DETAILS

Thomas Duurland
Program Manager Landscape Finance
IDH the Sustainable Trade Initiative
Duurland@idhtrade.org

WWF Idh Toolkit Final

Uploaded by

Document Informationclick to expand document information

Document Informationclick to expand document information

Copyright:

Available Formats

WWF Idh Toolkit Final

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

WWF Idh Toolkit Final

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Attracting

This guide has been developed by

coverphoto © pat whelen

Attracting Investments for

a warning or indicator, suggesting that there is a potential problem or threat

a loan to a project or company that holds legal claim to the borrower’s

Attracting Investments for

Quick-start guide 12 Project origination based on 26 3.1 De-risking landscape finance 66

Project origination based on the market 36

PROCESS FOR LANDSCAPE FINANCE PROJECTS: 20

Introducing the four stages 21

Formulating specific investment 40 Structuring the deal and 86

Objective of stage 4 87 APPENDIX III

ADDITIONAL RESOURCES ADDITIONAL RESOURCES

Attracting Investments for

STAGE 1 Landscape strategy, including identification of bottlenecks

• Landscape finance projects are investment opportunities in companies or projects in a

Attracting Investments for

Attracting Investments for

Attracting Investments for

FIGURE 1. From origination to investment-readiness: the process

Stage 2 is about engaging with the right stakeholders and

Attracting Investments for

Description A person or A person or entity All affected Organization that

Attracting Investments for

opportunities project could be commercially interesting to

After drawing up a landscape strategy, the main priority is to develop land-

1. Project origination based on a landscape strategy;

Attracting Investments for

Review landscape and/ Review Formulate Determine • Biodiversity loss

Water scarcity Overuse of water for irrigation purposes.

1.1 Review landscape needs and tainable farming practices.

NDCs, SDGs, net-zero commitments, etc.)?

Attracting Investments for

1.2 Review key stakeholders

Stakeholder Role in landscape finance projects

Equipment providers Provide equipment for project implementation

Attracting Investments for

Cameroon is the fourth largest cocoa-producing

The landscape strategy includes industry

Attracting Investments for

finance project ideas long-term, interlinked goals

What interventions may lead to the desired impacts in the landscape?

D Implement and finance drip irrigation for

Directly engaging with companies and (possible) project mechanism.

developers in the landscape

Requirements to assess whether a landscape finance project can fast-track to stage 2

Attracting Investments for

ACTION Final checklist before moving to the next stage

Risk Mitigating Risk acceptance

Agriculture in the project area is Irrigation from a nearby water Acceptable

Attracting Investments for

Traditional sourcing approaches Preferred criteria for the project developer:

Minimum years of business operations

Building networks with sector stakeholders

TIPS & TRICKS

Attracting Investments for