Negro, Maria Khel Ref.2

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

NAME: NEGRO, MARIA KHEL SECTION: BSBA – HR1B

REFLECTION 2 IN
Lesson 2
Pagtatao sa Pilipinas
In Focus: The Austronesian Expansion- a Reaction to “Paths of Origin”
Jesus T. Peralta, Ph.D.

Based on the given readings about the Austronesian Expansion, Bellwood (1995) argues
that Yunnan in the south of the Chinese mainland is where the ancestors of Austronesian
speakers first appeared, and that a fishing and gardening society existed there as early as 6,000
BC. According to linguistic evidence, these people spoke a language that is allegedly connected
to the Tai-Kadai family of languages, which is spoken in Laos, Myanmar, and Thailand, all of
which are countries that border the Mekong River. According to Bellwood, waves of migration
from Taiwan between 2,500 BC and 500 AD brought all Southeast Asians and inhabitants of the
Pacific and Indian Oceans through the Philippines. Several groups of people traveled from China
to Taiwan between 4500 and 4000 BCE. These people either already spoke a distinct language or
started to do so.
These communities began to separate into three or four different subcultures by about
3000 BCE. One of these tribes started moving southward toward Indonesia and the Philippines.
The people of the Philippines, by this hypothesis, are descended from those cultures that
persisted on the Philippine islands while others migrated first southward, then eastward, and
finally westward. It began to spread from Easter Island in Southeast Asia to the north around
5000 BC and continued via the Philippines, Taiwan, and coastal South China before continuing
north along the Chinese coast to western and South Korea and, finally, Kyushu in Japan. The
Austronesian language family and the Malayo Polynesian group were staged in South China and
Taiwan. Between 4,000 and 3,000 BC, the population began to spread.
According to Bellwood (et al, 2004), there is no indication of a human population in
Batanes before 3700 BP (1750 BC). This time frame is well into the Philippines' Late Neolithic
Age. If the Austronesian Neolithic really did traverse this nation. As in the rest of mainland and
island Southeast Asia, the Neolithic border was established in Thailand as early as 10,000 BC.
The results show that rather than coming from Taiwan, earlier Neolithic movements came from
the south.
As I reflect, Every Filipino must use history as a reference for their present and future
plans to enhance our sense of national identity. As a result, it is important for us to understand
our national heritage and be proud of it. I am amazed how all the ascendants of Southeast Asians
and the peoples of the Pacific and the Indian Ocean passed through the Philippines in waves of
migration from 2,500 BC to 500 AD from Taiwan because in my opinion, it is not that easy to
travel and there is no easy access for transportation during that very old time and The people of
the Philippines, in accordance with the hypothesis in the readings, are descended from those
cultures that persisted on the Philippine islands while others migrated first southward, then
eastward, and finally westward. Considering the significance of the past and understanding how
past events shaped current events is one of the benefits of studying history. Learning from the
past helps us understand who we are and how we got here, as well as how to prevent mistakes in
the future and steer society in better directions to avoid having thoughts that specific past events
are just not “kuro-kuro” and also not from “chismis” just like how the actress and social media
personality Ella Cruz identifies the history.

You might also like