Sr004osust091104clecatbpgv 1 0
Sr004osust091104clecatbpgv 1 0
Sr004osust091104clecatbpgv 1 0
PREFACE .......................................................................................................... 5
I. Introduction .............................................................................................. 5
I. Technical ................................................................................................. 13
1. Information Technology for Efficient Road Freight Operations (Department for
Transport, UK with RHA and FTA)........................................................................ 13
2. Telematics for Efficient Road Freight Operations (Freight Best Practice /
Department for Transport, UK) ............................................................................ 14
3. Solar roof to save energy (FedEx, USA) ...................................................... 14
4. Fuel Saving Devices (Department for Transport, UK) ................................... 15
5. Fuel Management Guide............................................................................ 15
6. SmartWay, US Environment Protection Agency. .......................................... 15
7. Reduction of Waste through an Oil Treatment Plant .................................... 16
8. Reduced Water Consumption by Using a Modern Washing Facility ................ 16
9. Introduction of Power Saving Technology ................................................... 16
10. Double-deck Cargo for Increased Efficiency (Emons Cargo).......................... 16
11. Use of Intermodal Transport (Ewals Cargo Care)......................................... 16
12. Monitoring Fuel Consumption (Ewals Cargo Care)........................................ 17
13. Reduction of Emissions by Use of Low-emission vehicles (H.P Therkelsen A/S)
17
14. Improved Vehicle Utilization through Mobile Sludge Drainage (Joma
Slamsugningsservice AB) .................................................................................... 17
15. Eco Guardian – Lower Emissions and Fuel Consumption by a Comparative Trial
of Vehicle Technologies (J. W. Suckling Transport Limited) .................................... 18
16. Water-saving Equipment and Use of Rainwater for Vehicle Cleaning (Metzger
Spedition GmbH)................................................................................................ 18
17. Reduction of Water Consumption (Transportes Campillo SA) ........................ 18
18. Hybrid shunting locomotive (Port of Rotterdam).......................................... 18
19. Transport of waste materials by water (London Waste and
Bywaters/SmartBarge Ltd, UK) ............................................................................ 19
20. Improvement in aerodynamics (Aspray Transport Ltd / Freight Best Practice) 19
2
21. The Benefits of Operating Electric Vehicles in an Urban Environment (TNT /
Freight Best Practice).......................................................................................... 19
22. Innovation Secures Future at Rural Haulier (Andrew Black Limited) .............. 20
3
III. Workforce............................................................................................. 33
1. Impact of EcoDriving on emissions and fuel consumption............................. 33
2. The Fuel Efficient Truck Driver’s Handbook ................................................. 33
3. Engine Idling (case studies by Lloyd Fraser Group plc, Allies Bakeries Ltd, Ralph
Coleman International Ltd, Leggett’s Transport Ltd) .............................................. 33
4. Reduced Fuel Consumption and Accidents through Driver Training (Berger
Beteiligungsgesellschaft mbH) ............................................................................. 34
5. Bonus System to Encourage Drivers to Drive Safely and Fuel-efficiently (H.P.
Therkelsen) ....................................................................................................... 34
6. Driver Training for Improved Safety and Fuel Efficiency (Metzger Spedition
GmbH) .............................................................................................................. 34
7. Reduction of Accidents by an Internal Training Programme: “Challenge of the
Day” (Nijman/Zeetank Holding BV) ...................................................................... 34
8. Safe Loading and its Implications (Otto Görgens Spedition-Transportlogistik /
Lübeck) ............................................................................................................. 35
9. Reduction of Fuel Consumption supported by Monitoring (Transportes Campillo
SA) 35
10. Reducing Accidents by Implementing a Safety Manual (Transportes Luís
Simões) ............................................................................................................. 36
11. Improved Efficiency through use of a Guidance and Communication System
(VSV Frakt AB) ................................................................................................... 36
12. Driver Training for Improved Safety and Fuel Efficiency (Wullkotte & Hackmann
Trucking & Transport GbR) ................................................................................. 37
13. Fuel Saving in a Scottish Haulage Fleet (John Mitchell [Grangemouth] Ltd /
Freight Best Practice).......................................................................................... 37
4
Preface
I. Introduction
The challenge to mitigate the consequences of human activities on the environment has
become one of the major concerns characterising and influencing today’s business world.
The battle to preserve our environment has gained momentum over the years and is
now part of the policy of a growing number of enterprises. The ongoing battle against
climate change owing to GHG emissions has also come to the fore in policy and business
alike. These two different yet intertwined predicaments have not failed to impact upon
logistics activities, questioning some of the basic principles of this discipline. Transport
services appear to be one of the biggest sources of CO2 emissions and some of the
transport emissions are also pollutants. This is however an industry, which is, on the one
hand, indispensable for growth and employment and yet on the other hand has
enduring difficulties freeing its dependence on fossil fuels .
This being said, logistics is not only transport: a more wide-range view on what can be
done to improve the environmental performance of logistics can contribute to our
industry’s footprint in an area where legislation is finding it increasingly difficult to step
in.
The need to decrease emissions, but also to save energy and money, should be at the
heart of our companies’ thinking. Luckily these needs – lessening emissions, decreasing
the use of energy and saving money – are connected and may respond to the same
drivers: not only the logistics service provider, but also the transport user are likely to
benefit from savings that may be environmental as well as economical. There is an
abundance of possibilities and many companies have already found ways to improve
their business models with individual solutions, which have the potential to be developed
into best practices. Their experience is the source of the best practice models that
benefit and encourage others to do the same.
In other words we are not trying to re-invent the wheel in this booklet: we are trying to
disseminate the best practices that we have managed to collect from different sources,
and make them available to others, whether they are logistics service providers or users.
Whilst this may appear a minimalist approach, we believe it can be extremely helpful in
an area where sharing knowledge and know-how is crucial.
CLECAT has therefore decided to produce a guide for companies that have the intention
to implement best practices in their operations, with the aim of leading them to select
the best case in their business environment, in order to achieve an improved
sustainability and environmental performance in their activity. This paper compiles
several of these best practice cases for companies to evaluate, apply and use.
5
This paper focuses to a large extent on possible savings in resources, especially in the
road sector. As regards other modes of transport, their share in the modal split is much
smaller, they also seem to generate less best practice examples than is the case in road
transport. Whether this is the result of a lack of best practices in general, or whether
CLECAT did not receive enough feedback on this point is not completely clear at the
moment. We have also tried to include best practice cases that are not necessarily
related to transport, they include the economical use of heating/lighting/paper, the
introduction of better recycling systems or more efficient waste disposal, analysis of fuel
consumption, optimised servicing, and journey management.
Best practices work properly, if people apply them on a daily basis. As stated above, this
document is a living document, which will be circulated to CLECAT members once the
first edition is published. The majority of best practices, described in this booklet are
brief descriptions covering specifics like the aim, the time line and the costs of the
relevant best practice. The Best Practice Guide is envisioned as guidance material and
thus not as an exhaustive explanation or description. If more information is required the
CLECAT Secretariat will be more than happy to either establish direct contact with the
BP owners or provide more detailed information if already available. Additional
information is also readily available on the internet: the relevant web addresses are
provided beside the BP example.
As a starting point CLECAT has compiled a list in which areas best practices can be
found and are useful. The general list aims at providing food for thought for new ideas
and/or as incentive to report to CLECAT any positive achievements a company has
developed for its business. In the sections following, one can then find the concrete best
practices, divided into best practices divided into a Technical and an
Organisational/Workforce section.
At the end of this document you will find a short literature review with the most relevant
sources and further information.
We understand this exercise as a work in progress; this means we have the intention to
receive what CLECAT Members (and others) think of reporting as good practice,
whenever they are made aware of a positive experience.
To reiterate: this compilation has another important aim, namely promote active
participation and new additions to the Best Practice Guide from the transport industry in
general, and from the forwarders’ community and CLECAT member companies in
particular. The Best Practice Guide is a compilation that is meant to be an inspiration to
others and will guarantee a wide-range appeal and publicity in exchange for information
on a company’s efforts to promote environmentally-friendly, sustainable transport
solutions.
We therefore hope that you can also get inspired by reading the examples provided in
this guide, and send us your best practices as soon as possible. Keep in mind: this is an
ongoing exercise and a living document. Due to the nature of best practices, that are
developed, refined and then possibly exchanged again, once new technology or
6
management improvements have been developed, this publication can never be
complete or finished. Every additional best practice will make it however more complete
and meaningful. Please do contribute to making it as complete as possible.
Some may see this in the light of competition. We do not believe it should be seen as in
a competition between companies for the same market segment, but as a means of
letting others benefit from other experiences. The addition of your best practice is a
business chance, not a danger to your business. The inclusion in this compendium may
result in a better or greener public image of your company, raising its profile with
possible future clients.
We therefore encourage both Members and third parties to send their feedback and
experiences to the CLECAT Secretariat (info@clecat.org) for possible inclusion in the
next editions. A short abstract, possibly with the results of the best practice and a link,
providing more information, would be enough. This only takes a few minutes and will
provide your company with great visibility.
1. Technology
There are various improvements in the area of technology, which can benefit a company
enormously. Sometimes best practices will only bring minor changes and benefits in a
business process, sometimes one can make heavy investments, which although will only
pay off after some/long time of usage, the savings will build up over time and be very
significant. Whether the amount of money saved from new technology justifies the
(sometimes big) investment in new machinery/software or whether the economic
benefits of introducing new technology sometimes remain a risk, all are ideas best
evaluated case by case. The environmental benefits on the other hand are often clearly
noticeable, but again it often remains unclear which are the economic benefits, or even
worse, which are the hindrances leading to the sad equation “good for the environment:
bad for business”. However, it can not be stated often enough, and the best practices
shown in this document confirm this perception: many best practices that have had a
positive impact on the environment are also beneficial in their economic performance.
This can happen either directly, e.g. through less fuel consumption, or indirectly, e.g.
because customers are looking for a CO2 neutral transport and reward the positive
efforts made by their service provider by selecting their service over and above others.
The following paragraphs are a general introduction to this section on technology and
can maybe generate some further ideas in other areas.
Before starting with evaluating the benefits of any best practice, the company in
question should define for itself what is to be considered “green” in their perception. As
soon as it is clear what one wants to achieve, it is possible to research specific best
practices, which best suit the company’s business needs. An analysis of the company
can help to see what effects one can measure directly and what can only be measured
indirectly. Transport related benefits will always be indirect, if a company does not have
its own fleet. It is a critical first step to take informed and intelligent decisions.
7
On this specific point we wish to suggest that elements of environmental best practice
may be usefully introduced in the quality management of the company, even before
contemplating environmental standards such as ISO 140001.
Just to quote some of the most common measures that are advantageous in road
transport logistics, new kinds of radial tyres technology, with proper maintenance, can
run over 100,000 kilometres on the original tread. Another option is re-treadability,
which means that truck tyres are produced so that they are capable of being re-treaded
two or more times with careful and observant maintenance. Not only should a company
be trying to reduce waste during production, it can also recycle used tyres for energy
production. After retaining re-treadable casings, burning whole tyres in cement furnaces
and power stations is becoming more common overseas and particularly Australia - with
tyres producing more power than coal.2
A company has to keep its truck fleet up to date, because newer trucks will for
example feature the latest emissions-control technologies. With new software,
companies have the possibility to continually monitor engine performance. Investment in
new technologies will help reduce emissions and energy consumption at the same time.
Another idea would be to have primarily team-driven vehicles, which would result in
fewer empty runs (by generating a lot more revenue per kilometre). For this strategy to
be successful there should be no imbalance between inbound and outbound freight: this
means that one of the greatest efforts should also be made to adjust the commercial
policy in order to archive this result. Transportation management systems can help
analyze identifying profitable/unprofitable routes.
With the installation of alternative energy sources, e.g. solar photovoltaic4, solar hot
water, wind, ground source heat pump, and biomass systems, companies can save
energy/heating in their office buildings as well as in their warehouses. Offices and
warehouses that are built with modern eco-friendly criteria5 can make significant cuts on
the company’s energy bill.
1
http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_14000_essentials
2
See for example: http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa5356/is_199806/ai_n21423255/
3
“8 steps to a greener supply chain“:
http://www.worldtrademag.com/Articles/Feature_Article/BNP_GUID_9-5-
2006_A_10000000000000296125
4
See also Best Practice I.3.: FedEx plans to install the largest rooftop solar-electric system in the
US at its distribution hub in Woodbridge, N.J. This is the fifth solar power project for FedEx and
will produce 2.42 megawatt solar power.
5
For example: http://www.businessweekly.co.uk/2009052034974/property-and-construction/eco-
friendly-warehouse-for-wine-society.html
8
When evaluating facilities and vehicles, energy consumption data can help find
energy sources of energy waste, e.g. electrical equipment, which uses energy just by
being in standby mode.6 As it was noted above, the identification of a carbon footprint is
an important feature for conducting any kind of ‘green business’. There are companies,
who can deliver such a service7, but it would be more attractive and valuable to come to
a European standard, instead of struggling with several conflicting solutions.
Waste itself is inevitable and unavoidable, but there is always room left for waste
reduction, which will lead to a better environmental performance as well as economic
benefits through savings on waste disposal fees. Recycling is an option to enhance the
environmental performance, in other words disposing/recycling items like computers,
monitors, keyboards and fluorescent bulbs can save money and can also be proposed as
a service to third parties.
We shall not deal with bio-fuels and additives in this section, as this is a topic that is
worth a more detailed and dedicated publication. The same goes for all new vehicle
related technology (hybrid, electrical, hydrogen, etc.)
2. Personnel
In the area of personnel there are various possibilities to enhance both the economic
and environmental performance at the same time. Thinking of logistics the most notable
and well known is driver education and training, which focuses on making drivers
aware of fuel-efficient driving, and contributes to enhancing the safety of both driver
and goods. This generates savings in the form of lower insurance premiums, less energy
consumption and better use of resources.
6
For general energy consumption data in the transport sector in the USA, see the Transportation
Energy Data Book: http://www-cta.ornl.gov/data/tedb27/Edition27_Full_Doc.pdf
7
E.g. http://www.carbonfootprint.com/index.html: aimed at helping small businesses all over the
world understand their impact on climate change
8
See for example: http://www.globalreporting.org/NR/rdonlyres/541615B9-9392-448F-AD2A-
53C38F2524DF/0/SS_LogisticsTransportation_ENG.pdf (Logistics and Transportation) or
http://www.globalreporting.org/NR/rdonlyres/0F09CCFF-C378-4B5F-9944-
76E24679226B/0/SS_FinancialServicesEnvironmental_ENG.pdf (environmental reporting)
9
E.g. Wal-Mart in the US urged their suppliers to reduce packaging and conserve natural
resources. Through this initiative 667.000 metric tons of CO2 will be saved. About $ 11 billion is
expected in savings from a 5% reduction in 10% of the global packaging industry.
9
Examples of driver education measures can be found in the detailed best practices
below. Some examples for driver education: teaching drivers about tyre maintenance
and optimal tyre pressures etc. This contributes to lifting the current low levels of tyre
maintenance and prolonging the life-cycle of tyres. Driver training programmes can give
incentives to drivers who perform efficiently in achieving fuel economy through reducing
idle time and keeping speed limits within a certain range: engine control modules can be
used to set maximum speed limits, which again will help to diminish waste of fuel and
accidents.
Offices benchmarking tools can improve the work flow. A company should calculate
an ideal benchmark based on the type of office space, number of workstations and
standard occupancy. As a next step benchmarking should be carried out to be tailored to
the specificities of the relevant building. The tailoring allows working hours, including
weekend working, to be specified for each type of office space within the building.
Details of catering, vending and IT equipment and machine/computer rooms can be
added.
A very simple, but effective way to save electricity: turn off lights (or other
electrical equipment) when not used. One has to keep in mind that it is always
cheaper to turn lights off than to leave them on. Improving awareness of energy wasted
can save up to 15% of energy costs.10 However different kinds of lighting might require
different solutions (e.g. High Pressure Sodium, like some of the laps used in warehouses,
cannot be quickly turned off and back on again).
To the same effect one should make good use of natural lighting, as most people prefer
to work in natural light. One can do this by ensuring that windows and roof lights are
not obstructed, and are regularly cleaned, inside and out. Blinds should be used only if
necessary, as they are often left closed leading to artificial lighting being used,
regardless of daylight availability. It is unlikely that glare will affect the same part of a
building all day.
If a company is just establishing itself or it plans to expand and set up new facilities, it
could be beneficial to locate these facilities in the vicinity of employees’ apartments.
Companies could otherwise also pay employees’ public transport tickets, bicycles, and
encourage car-pooling (driving together with other employees). The shorter the way of
the employee to his work, the better the environmental performance and the
performance of the employee due to less travel time.
It is fundamental that simple savings practices are promoted among the staff.
3. Smart/strategic logistics
10
http://www.loseyourexcuse.gov/docs/lyefacts.pdf
10
over a long period of time, while technology often has to be replaced after some years
to have the newest or best available technology. The training of personnel is also
producing long term effects, but personnel may leave (with the training it has received)
and starting from scratch become necessary, once new employees are hired.
There are various ways to improve the management of the supply-chain. Some of the
following examples have been put into practice by companies with great success. You
will find more information of those success stories later in the document.
Route planning enables a company to identify less profitable (or more costly) routes,
whose planning can be optimized. In commercial Route Planning less profitable routes
can be abandoned to the competition, if no other solution is available. Modern computer
programmes, in addition with tracking and tracing technology and reporting schemes,
are able to calculate the best solutions and the best routes. Identifying a non-profitable
route is the first step to amending the situation. Here software can also help, but often a
forwarder will need to look for solutions without the help of management software, once
the problem is identified (e.g. find new customers to decrease empty running).
Intermodal solutions can bring great benefits, because they combine the best of
various modes of transport, possibly to improve the overall performance. When carrying
goods from A to B, it is generally advisable to look for alternative solutions and compare
them. It is thus possible to create geographical shortcuts in the trips (e.g. in several
places in the Mediterranean), decrease the dependency on fossil fuel, whilst reducing
greenhouse gas emissions. Transhipping cargo units may be costly and this is the
reasons why it is essential to cut on costs wherever possible, e.g. by using the European
Modular System at the end legs of intermodal trips.
The Consolidation of cargo is one of the best techniques to cut costs and emissions.
It increases logistics service providers’ revenues whilst offering lower costs to shippers
and providing environmental advantages to all. Consolidation works both in transit
(groupage services) and when goods are standing still (third party warehouses)
Consolidation has only advantages: less freight traffic, less environmental damages,
better utilization of vehicle fleet, less space occupancy, etc. The only problem is
overcoming the “ownership” prejudice, which often makes ones’ “own” warehouse, truck,
van, aircraft look better than a shared one. There will be Best Practices examples further
on in this document about consolidations and their advantages.
11
IV. Concluding remarks
CLECAT hopes to provide with this guide a tool for companies to improve their way of
doing business, primarily from an environmental point of view, but also from an
economic point of view. Best practices are an important tool to gain sometimes small,
but sometimes also big improvements that in the long run can be visible in a company’s
balance at the end of the year.
While the term ‘best practices’ implies that some source has the final answer to a matter
in dispute or disarray, one has to acknowledge that best practice, in the sense it is used
in this document (i.e. any kind of improvement in technology, operation or workforce
management, resulting in economic and/or environmental benefits for the relevant
company), should never be seen as a final solution, but rather as one important step
towards a constant improvement in the flow of business operations. In this light we
believe that sustainability best practices should be inserted straight into the quality
management of our companies and become an integral part of it.
The practitioner is best placed to evaluate a new measure and report on its success for
the benefit of its company and, by means of this or similar instruments, the trading
community, its customers and the environment at large. For this reason all are
encouraged to submit their experiences and suggestions, especially the very rarely seen
best practice examples in the area of air, rail and maritime transport would provide a
welcome and important addition to this Best Practice Guide.
12
BEST PRACTICE EXAMPLES
The following part is the most important part of this document: the descriptions and
references to the various best practices experienced and reported by companies and
organisations. It is divided in 3 different sections: best practices relating to Technical,
Organisational and Workforce aspects.
Each best practice case will contain a header, which describes why this is to be
considered a best practice for a given company. This is followed by the aim which stood
at the beginning of the company’s decision to improve its performance. A short
methodological presentation follows, whilst at the same time it precedes the costs
analysis (if available) and the results. More information is normally available at the web
links that appear at the very end of each section.
It has to be stressed that there is always more information available for each of the best
practices listed hereunder. This CLECAT document just gives the highlights. All are
welcome to contact CLECAT’s Secretariat for specific questions. Your question will either
be answered directly or you will be put in contact with the companies that successfully
introduced the related measure into their business paradigm.
I. Technical
11
Commercial Vehicle Safety Regulation (CVSR)
13
control monitoring systems, vehicle weighing systems, security systems), managing
drivers (driver information systems, digital tachographs and hours compliance tools),
and managing fuel (fuel recording systems).
Steps to take: identify the need select the system implement the system
monitor and improve the system (there are further steps and cautionary principles
mentioned in the document).
Costs: € 52.250 (for a case study)
Results: Financial benefit of € 123.000 each year.
Link / More Information: http://www.freightbestpractice.org.uk/information-technology-
guide-for-efficient-road-freight-operations
2. Telematics for Efficient Road Freight Operations (Freight Best Practice / Department
for Transport, UK)
Aim: Telematics can provide information about performance that may be difficult to
collect by other means. This data can identify mechanical problems or poor driving
styles that can have a significant adverse effect on operating costs: excessive or
deteriorating fuel consumption; over-revving within a gear; harsh braking; gear
changing at inefficient engine revs; accelerator pedal pushed to the floor when
accelerating.
Method: Report identifies 6 key areas, where telematics can be useful: Vehicle and
driver data; paperless manifest and proof-of-delivery systems; vehicle and trailer and
asset tracking systems; satellite navigation systems; safety and security systems
Potential benefits of telematics reduced fuel consumption through effective fuel
monitoring, to identify losses and improve future vehicle specification; reduced fuel
consumption and maintenance costs through effective driver performance costs through
effective driver performance monitoring, promoting improved driving styles; reduced
accident rates which could lead to lower insurance costs; increased vehicle and load
security; vehicle and driver information can be used to set up driver league tables.
Costs: for additional technical equipment and improvements
Results: Very wide applicability of telematics, which can be used to solve various
problems. Example areas for improvement are high vehicle maintenance costs, high
road accident rate, inaccurate time sheets, invoicing errors, or unpredictable traffic
delays en route.
Link/More Information: http://www.freightbestpractice.org.uk/telematics-for-efficient-
road-freight-operations
14
Results: When the system is fully operating, the combined environmental benefits based
on a projected annual reduction of approximately 1,867 metric tons of CO2 emissions,
are equivalent to one of the following:
• More than 340 passenger cars not driven for one year.
• 802,129 litres of gasoline not burned.
• 4,300 barrels of oil not consumed.
• 259 households’ electricity use for one year.
• 47,872 tree seedlings grown for 10 years.
• 13 acres of forest preserved from deforestation.
Data is derived from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s greenhouse gas
equivalencies calculator.
Link/More information: http://news.van.fedex.com/fedexgroundsolarpanel
15
Result: depends on the programme. Generally savings in fuel consumption and
reduction of GHG emissions.
Links/More information: http://www.epa.gov/smartway/basic-information/index.htm
16
Results: CO2 could be reduced by at least 32% in comparison to road transport. The
intermodal transport has reached and even bettered the goal of 92% utilization.
Links/More information: IRU Best Practice Guide: http://www.iru.org/index/cms-
filesystem-action?file=en_Best_Industry_Practices/ewals.pdf
17
15. Eco Guardian – Lower Emissions and Fuel Consumption by a Comparative Trial of
Vehicle Technologies (J. W. Suckling Transport Limited)
Aim: The objective of the Eco Guardian project (stage 1) was to conduct a comparative
trial between two initially identical vehicles, one of which was then equipped with
particle filters and operated on ultra-low-sulphur diesel (ULSD). The trial covered fuel
consumption, emissions of the four main air pollutants (HC, CO, NOx and particles) and
the costs involved.
Method: The measure was verified twice, the first time immediately after
implementation (first test), the second time after six months in use (second test).
Costs: The cost of the tests amounted to ca. € 35.500.
Results: Reduction in total costs through higher fuel efficiency. Fuel efficiency: The Eco
Guardian vehicle recorded an improvement of nearly 2% in fuel consumption against the
control vehicle. Emissions: The Eco Guardian vehicle recorded significant reductions in
emissions of all four air pollutants.
Links/More information: IRU Best Practice Guide: http://www.iru.org/index/cms-
filesystem-action?file=en_Best_Industry_Practices/suckling.pdf
16. Water-saving Equipment and Use of Rainwater for Vehicle Cleaning (Metzger
Spedition GmbH)
Aim: High-pressure cleaners produce large volumes of wastewater.
Method: A new water-saving high-pressure cleaner was put into operation in 1996. It
has led to a significant reduction in water consumption and the associated costs. The
installation of water cisterns enables high-priced drinking water to be substituted by
rainwater (which is free of charge).
Costs: The price of the high-pressure cleaner unit was € 2.820.
Results: The costs of drinking water and sewage disposal were reduced by more than
50% for 1999 compared with 1995.
Links/More information: IRU Best Practice Guide: http://www.iru.org/index/cms-
filesystem-action?file=en_Best_Industry_Practices/metzger.pdf
18
often long waiting times in the shunting process. The auxiliary and drive systems are
then powered by a battery. With a hybrid locomotive the diesel engine runs at maximum
capacity only when there is a demand for maximum power or in order to charge the
battery.
Because of the relatively small diesel generator and the battery pack, savings can be
made on fuel and maintenance costs, and so the investment in such a locomotive can be
recouped in just a few years and the emissions of exhaust fumes, particulates and noise
substantially reduced.
Costs: not known
(Estimated) Results: Alstom expects to achieve fuel savings of at least 40% and to halve
the volume of CO2, NOx and particulate emissions. Noise will also certainly be reduced
by 15 dBa and the company is counting on reducing maintenance costs.
Link/More information: directly from the Port of Rotterdam.
19. Transport of waste materials by water (London Waste and Bywaters/SmartBarge Ltd,
UK)
Aim: Using a new barge concept of a container with recyclables.
Methods: Containers are transported half a mile by road to a material recycling facility
for sorting. For the return sailing the barge was loaded with a container of residual
waste and returned to an energy recovery facility. Unlike conventional steel barges,
SmartBarge is made up of modular components incorporating a steel chassis and rotor-
moulded polyethylene float sections. The modules lock together and act like a life ring
around the hold or the container, being carried.
Costs: £ 7 million
(Estimated) Results: the SmartBarge has a tremendous flexibility as it can be filled with
different types of containers and different loads. Reducing GHG emissions (water
transport has 20% of the carbon footprint of road).
Link/More information:
http://www.letsrecycle.com/do/ecco.py/view_item?listid=37&listcatid=217&listitemid=5
1775§ion=waste_management (with further links to the companies involved)
21. The Benefits of Operating Electric Vehicles in an Urban Environment (TNT / Freight
Best Practice)
Aim: use the advantages of electric vehicles in urban transport.
Methods: exchanging diesel vehicles with electric vehicles makes it necessary to change
some operational practices.
Costs: investment in a new vehicle fleet. Specific costs unknown.
19
Results: Fuel cost approximately 20% of diesel equivalent: potential for reduced
maintenance through fewer mechanical parts.
Link/More information:
http://www.freightbestpractice.org.uk/default.aspx?appid=2000&fileid=929
20
II. Organisational
21
4. Performance Management for Efficient Road Freight Operations
Aim: The guide gives decision-makers an understanding of performance management
concepts in freight operations, as well as advice on putting a performance management
process in place.
Methods: Various case studies on improving the management of freight operators.
Provides a guide to be used as a reference document, providing guidance on concepts
relating to performance management in freight operations and introducing the types of
key performance indicators that can be measured in an operation.
Main themes covered by the guide: Key Performance Indicators (KPIs); roles of
management; measuring process; measuring tools; analysis of results; benchmarking;
strategies to increase performance.
Costs: depending on the measures: none or costs for new equipment
Results: depending on the measures
Link/More Information: http://www.freightbestpractice.org.uk/performance-
management-for-efficient-road-freight-operations
22
Costs: additional costs through warehouse management, but also additional revenues.
Results: Economic and environmental benefits through consolidation and reduction of
freight traffic between the logistics provider and manufacturer
Link/More Information:
http://www.bestlog.org/index.php?eID=tx_nawsecuredl&u=1210&file=uploads/tx_bestl
ogorg/2008_sieber_consolidation.pdf&t=1253291634&hash=e924c82315b146c174b81a
52c3ac9b41 (it is necessary to have a login for the website)
23
Link / More Information:
http://www.bestlog.org/index.php?eID=tx_nawsecuredl&u=1210&file=uploads/tx_bestl
ogorg/2008_sieber_telematics.pdf&t=1253291634&hash=baee8055e0214e3e3ab3a7958
38bebd3 (it is necessary to have a login for the website)
10. Measuring, Monitoring and Reducing Fuel Consumption (Egon Sörensen Transport
A/S)
Aim: reduce fuel consumption.
Method: drivers have to record their mileage and fuel consumption after each trip. Also
recorded are the amount of goods and the route. Software can analyze the data and
show savings and possibilities to decrease the environmental impact of transportation.
Results: Fuel consumption could be reduced by nearly 6,800 litres, equalling a cost
reduction of ca. € 4.500.
Links/More information: IRU Best Practice Guide: http://www.iru.org/index/cms-
filesystem-action?file=en_Best_Industry_Practices/sorensen.pdf
11. Tankshare – Improved Utilization through Groupage Freight Service (J. W. Suckling
Transport Limited)
Aim: minimized empty running through shared utilization of transport capacity by its
customers.
Method: In April 2000, a pilot scheme was launched and attracted significant interest
amongst oil companies. Fourteen companies used the service during its pilot stage,
paying rates based on a simple price-per-litre basis, by postcode, depending on delivery
load size.
Costs: TankShare is a commercial initiative and, apart from the purchase of new vehicles,
required no specific funding to launch.
Results: Improved vehicle utilization and consequent reduction in empty running.
Links/More information: IRU Best Practice Guide: http://www.iru.org/index/cms-
filesystem-action?file=en_Best_Industry_Practices/suckling.pdf
24
areas of improvement were identified, particularly in the working conditions for staff in
the material-planning department.
Costs: no extra costs
Results: By increasing the overall planning time for individual transport tasks from two
to six hours, capacity utilization of the vehicles was increased by 5-10%. Overall,
employees spend less time planning, loading and executing transport tasks (for example,
adhering to rest times and other regulations). The amount of damaged goods was
reduced by 10% per year. Fuel costs were reduced. Fewer mistakes were made,
communication was improved and IT was integrated more smoothly. Communication is
now more direct and effective (members of the communication group know who they
can contact in the other company). Mistakes are uncovered and resolved more quickly.
Customer loyalty is increased.
Links/More information: IRU Best Practice Guide: http://www.iru.org/index/cms-
filesystem-action?file=en_Best_Industry_Practices/kl.pdf
25
number of accidents from 88 to 38, the total cost of accidents was reduced from €
306.000 to € 132.100.
Links/More information: IRU Best Practice Guide: http://www.iru.org/index/cms-
filesystem-action?file=en_Best_Industry_Practices/nobilia.pdf
16. Regulations for Good Common Practices in the Road Transport of Dangerous Goods
(Trancister Sociedade de Transportes SA)
Aim: The main goals are the reduction of accidents, crossovers, spillages and incidents
that cause new accidents. The motto of the project is “No accidents in three years’ time”.
Method: The project involves a large number of procedures that can be summarized in
the categories driver regulations and vehicle regulations (audits, safety management
systems, set of procedures with the aim of increasing safety throughout the company’s
activities, Project “Operational System of Supporting Accidents”, ISO 9002 certification).
Costs: The cost of implementation is estimated as 2-3% of annual turnover.
Results: Elimination of spillages (oil pollution), reductions in fuel consumption through
training and defensive driving, reduced accidents through increased training, increased
general safety, improved corporate image.
Links/More information: IRU Best Practice Guide: http://www.iru.org/index/cms-
filesystem-action?file=en_Best_Industry_Practices/Trancister.pdf
26
communications with the vehicles, Intranet and Internet architecture, communications
with customers and system security.
Costs: Investments over the past year in new information and communication
technology have amounted to about € 550.000
Results: Reducing the number of empty trips by ca. 2%; easier control of the company’s
objectives; better communication between clients, drivers and centres; simplified
administrative processes; substantial reduction in communication costs.
Links/More information: IRU Best Practice Guide: http://www.iru.org/index/cms-
filesystem-action?file=en_Best_Industry_Practices/simoes.pdf
27
capacity to solve the problems of the Swiss night trucking ban and the high tolls for
trucks on Swiss roads.
Method: Cargo Domizil offers less-than-full-truckload (LTL) shipments via combined
rail/road facilities. Cargo Domizil trucks collect consignments during the afternoon and
take them to these rail-side depots. From there they are loaded on trains, forwarded to
Olten near Zurich and sorted by the SBB and sent to their destination depot overnight.
Structural changes were accompanied by a training programme.
Costs: Not known.
Results: Besides overcoming the night-time trucking ban and avoiding expensive road
tolls, the use of rail offers significant advantages in Switzerland’s mountainous regions,
which are sometimes difficult to reach for large trucks.
Links/More information:
http://www.bestlog.org/index.php?eID=tx_nawsecuredl&u=1210&file=uploads/tx_bestl
ogorg/bestLog_best_practice_CargoDomizil_intermodal_truck_transport.pdf&t=1253291
374&hash=071354b0051ad0595b699f71a2f00161 (it is necessary to have a login for the
website)
28
Costs: not available
Results: Reduction of average loading time, now standing at 78 minutes, in comparison
to 130 minutes in a similar MAPEI plant that was not re-organised (- 40%).
Links/More information:
http://www.bestlog.org/index.php?eID=tx_nawsecuredl&u=1210&file=uploads/tx_bestl
ogorg/20090414_mapei.pdf&t=1253291840&hash=ec6441cbc6135427ee192ed5b8c3c3
58 (it is necessary to have a login for the website)
29
25. Cargo shuttle between Port of Barcelona and SEAT
Aim: to reduce lorry movements and introduce an environmentally friendly method of
transporting cargo from the port of Barcelona to the construction plant of SEAT in
Martorell.
Methods: Cargometro is a joint venture of three regional operators: FGC, RENFE
Operadora and Comsa Rail Transport. It uses the 17.5 km dual-gauge freight route
between Route Can Tunis and Castellbisbal, built under the Madrid – Barcelona high
speed programme. The transport of the manufactured cars is being done by the
company Autometro.
Costs: the regional government has invested € 8.6 million. The contract with SEAT has a
duration of 10 years.
Results: it is expected to remove 32 000 lorry movements from the roads per year.
Link/More information: directly from the company. Overview (in Spanish) can be found
under http://www.ccoo.cat/mobilitat/documentacio/infomobilitat/20090601/seat.pdf
26. Freight Best Practice “Fuel Efficiency Intervention Trials - How to Test and Save”
Aim: Provide a tool for improving fuel efficiency of heavy goods vehicle fleets. From the
publication: “A fuel efficiency intervention is defined as a device, system or action
introduced by a vehicle operator to reduce fuel use.”
Methods: The brochure (see link below) provides a 12-step process which enables
companies to develop a transition to new technology. The brochure also includes 12
case studies of companies that used the freight best practice tools with success.
Costs: depending on the measures that are being implemented. Costs will need to cover
new equipment/technology.
Results: depending on the measures improvement of fuel efficiency.
Link/More information:
http://www.freightbestpractice.org.uk/download.aspx?pid=4876&action=save
27. “Tesco Sets the Pace on Low Carbon and Efficiency” (TESCO / Freight Best Practice)
Aim: To improve efficiency and reduce carbon emissions from its distribution operation.
Methods: More efficient fleet management by reviewing and assessing all its activities
and the interfaces between the main operational areas, including: primary distribution;
planning and loading; methods of transportation; network efficiency; delivery to stores.
As a result they updated their warehouse management system and standardised all
settings within the transport planning tools. They also looked for alternatives to road, i.e.
multimodal transport. In addition TESCO increasingly used double-deck trailers for their
road operations.
Costs: unknown.
Results: switching to multimodal transport has resulted in a drop of CO2 emissions by
over 2,750 tonnes per year. In one year they increased the use of double-deck units by
7% from 191 to 205 trips per day, taking 1,221,492 km off the road and saving 948
tonnes per year of CO2. All measures together saved 7,489 tonnes of CO2 per year.
Link/More information:
http://www.freightbestpractice.org.uk/default.aspx?appid=2000&fileid=889
28. Short Haul Rail Freight (Lafarge Cement Ltd / The Malcolm Group / Freightliner Ltd /
Freight Best Practice)
Aim: prove the profitability of short haul rail freight in comparison to road haulage. The
main challenges faced by rail freight are the tendency for longer end to end journey
30
times and the need to double handle products where an onward road journey is
required
Methods: multi-modal service, providing the end-to-end delivery of products using road
to rail and then back to road for final delivery. This provides a seamless customer
collection and delivery service for products that can be containerised. From the
customer’s point of view this can be cost effective for just a single container using the
service.
Costs: not applicable.
Results: significant savings in fuel and reduction of CO2 output (e.g. for Malcolm annual
fuel use was reduced from 352,538 litres to 158,326 litres, and CO2 output was reduced
from 927 tonnes per year to 416 tonnes).
Link/More information:
http://www.freightbestpractice.org.uk/default.aspx?appid=2000&fileid=942
31
ogorg/bestLog_best_practice_Bertschi_Shell_network_redesign.pdf&t=1253361445&has
h=31c4728772f7ae43aab62a42da2a2919 (it is necessary to have a login for the
website)
32
III. Workforce
3. Engine Idling (case studies by Lloyd Fraser Group plc, Allies Bakeries Ltd, Ralph
Coleman International Ltd, Leggett’s Transport Ltd)
Aim: Excessive idling of HGV engines is simply a waste of fuel and money. With modern
vehicles, the cost of switching off the engine and starting up again is usually less than
the cost of leaving the engine idling.
Methods: 4 stages: Plan your campaign brief your drivers run the campaign
communicate the results
Duration: advisable to have a trial period: 2 weeks without anti-idling, 2 weeks with
anti-idling measures
Costs: training and communication
Results: if results of the trial would be extended to a whole year, the company (Lloyd
Fraser) would save 65.000 litres of diesel, € 65.250 and 170 tonnes of CO2. The other
companies have also experienced significant savings.
Link/More Information: http://www.freightbestpractice.org.uk/engine-idling-costs-you-
money-and-gets-you-nowhere
33
4. Reduced Fuel Consumption and Accidents through Driver Training (Berger
Beteiligungsgesellschaft mbH)
Aim: reduction of fuel consumption.
Method: driver education, each truck is equipped with a driver handbook that includes
information on economical driving methods. To evaluate the programme a measurement
system was created.
Costs: € 72.000 for training courses and evaluation
Results: fuel consumption was reduced, saving 1.12%, saving € 73.000 in 6 months.
More dramatic was the reduction of accidents, with a reduction of 25%, which
amounted to savings of € 88.000 in 6 months.
Links/More information: IRU Best Practice Guide: http://www.iru.org/index/cms-
filesystem-action?file=en_Best_Industry_Practices/berger.pdf
6. Driver Training for Improved Safety and Fuel Efficiency (Metzger Spedition GmbH)
Aim: Improved safety and fuel efficiency. A driver training programme was initiated in
1997.
Method: All drivers took part in “economy” and “safe driving” classes. The training
focuses on teaching drivers, even the most experienced, moderate driving methods and
correct gearbox handling. Appropriate incentives were introduced to encourage and
reward above-average economical and, thus, ecological driving behaviour.
Costs: The training costs in 1997 amounted to € 6.100, which is equivalent to € 120 per
year for each of the 50 drivers who had to be trained.
Results: Fuel efficiency has increased by 12%. The company has saved a total of 30.000
litres in fuel. At the same time, CO2 emissions have been reduced by a total of 81.000
kg. The number of accidents has decreased by more than 8%.
Links/More information: IRU Best Practice Guide: http://www.iru.org/index/cms-
filesystem-action?file=en_Best_Industry_Practices/metzger.pdf
34
Costs: The course was written internally during office hours and consisted of a
compilation of historical data, practice examples, etc. The total costs were about €
12.000 (200 hr at € 60/hr). The cost of the training itself is approximately € 2.500 per
person.
Results: One result of the internal training programme is the 16% reduction in road
accidents. Nevertheless, because of the overall reduction in road accidents, the company
received an insurance rebate of some € 7.500. Integration of new employees has
become a much easier task thanks to the internal training programme.
Links/More information: IRU Best Practice Guide: http://www.iru.org/index/cms-
filesystem-action?file=en_Best_Industry_Practices/nijman.pdf
35
Links/More information: IRU Best Practice Guide: http://www.iru.org/index/cms-
filesystem-action?file=en_Best_Industry_Practices/campillo.pdf
11. Improved Efficiency through use of a Guidance and Communication System (VSV
Frakt AB)
Aim: sustainable development by offering harvesting and transport systems that have a
lower impact on the environment
Method: the introduction of an EMS and further increase the efficiency of its haulage
work, the company has developed a computerized system for transport guidance and
communication. The system is called TROMB (Transport Och Mobil Beordring, Transport
and Mobile Instructions). TROMB supports mobile communications and consists of a
Geographical Information System (GIS), Global Positioning System (GPS), e-mail and
emergency alarms. Each mobile unit consists of a computer, keyboard, mouse, monitor,
GPS receiver, Mobitex, DARC (Data Radio Channel) communication and an alarm.
Mobitex is a wireless network architecture necessary to support wireless terminals. This
system is the basis for: transport planning; the distribution of transport orders; direct
mailing to the logging truck; alarms in case of accident.
Costs: cost is considerably higher than for a standard office computer. Each mobile unit
costs about SEK 60.000 (€ 6.300) including mounting, accessories and antennas. The
forestry research unit in Skogforsk nevertheless calculates that the system can be
amortized in under two years.
Results: On the basis of an annual survey of all logging trucks, it is estimated that the
TROMB system will reduce CO2, NOx, and particle emissions by 5% per transported
tonne between 1998 and 2003. Information can easily be transferred between the
mobile communication systems and the onboard units. This means that the logging
trucks can operate over larger geographical areas and 24 hours a day. Also, the rate of
returning cargo has increased. Telephone costs have decreased because of the e-mail
system.
Links/More information: IRU Best Practice Guide: http://www.iru.org/index/cms-
filesystem-action?file=en_Best_Industry_Practices/vsv.pdf
36
12. Driver Training for Improved Safety and Fuel Efficiency (Wullkotte & Hackmann
Trucking & Transport GbR)
Aim: driver training programme to improve skills appropriately
Methods: The drivers are responsible for determining their fuel consumption. Any
irregularities are analysed immediately and possible causes are discussed. If extra
maintenance is required, the schedule is checked to see of this can be programmed in
Costs: The training costs are € 610 per employee per year. This includes: training in safe
and economical driving; training by specialists in transporting dangerous goods; training
by specialists in occupational safety methods; training by company management.
Results: Based on an average of 145.000 km per driver per year, the costs for driver
training are € 0.42/100 km. If the driver saves an average of 0.75 litres of fuel per 100
km through economical driving, then € 0.53/100 km is saved in fuel costs. The result is
a cost advantage of € 0.10/100 km or € 151 per year.
Links/More information: IRU Best Practice Guide: http://www.iru.org/index/cms-
filesystem-action?file=en_Best_Industry_Practices/wh.pdf
13. Fuel Saving in a Scottish Haulage Fleet (John Mitchell [Grangemouth] Ltd / Freight
Best Practice)
Aim: reduce running costs of their fleet by investing in driver training, anti-idling policy
and aerodynamics specification.
Methods: Driver training with the help of the Safe and Fuel Efficient Driving (SAFED)
programme. For modern vehicles the cost of switching off the engine and starting up
again is usually less than the cost of leaving the engine idling. Thus the company
invested in an anti-idling campaign.
Costs: relatively low – driver education.
Results: 7% reduction in fuel consumption and CO2 output and fuel costs saved in the
amount of £ 274,089 through driver training. Anti-idling measures led to weekly savings
of £ 700 per week.
Link/More information:
http://www.freightbestpractice.org.uk/default.aspx?appid=2000&fileid=936
37
Literature and useful links
(Availability checked 06/2009)
Freight Best Practice website (includes various case studies and best practice
documents) http://www.freightbestpractice.org.uk/default.aspx?appid=1948
(additions on a regular basis)
IRU: Best Industry Practices
o 1st issue of Best Practice document: http://www.iru.org/index/cms-
filesystem-action?file=en_Publications/bip_2001-gb.pdf (2001)
o 2nd issue of Best Practice document: http://www.iru.org/index/cms-
filesystem-action?file=en_Publications/bip04.E.pdf (2004)
BESTUFS – Best Urban Freight Solutions: Swedish project on Urban Freight best
practices http://www.bestufs.net/
o Reports available under BESTUFS I and BESTUFS II
ETTAR project (Environmental Technologies, Training and Awareness-Raising)
http://www.ettar.eu/results.html
bestLog - Creating a Dissemination and Promotion Platform for Logistics Best
Practice http://www.bestlog.org/index.php?id=226 (2009)
Green Logistics – Research into the sustainability of logistics systems and supply
chains http://www.greenlogistics.org/PageView.aspx?id=97
Energy Saving Trust
http://www.energysavingtrust.org.uk/business/Business/Transport-in-business
European Environmental Agency – reports on transport best practices and
activities of member states
http://www.eea.europa.eu/themes/transport/reports
On the Road to Climate Neutral Freight Transportation
http://publikationswebbutik.vv.se/shopping/ShowItem____3623.aspx
SAFED (Safe And Fuel Efficient Driving) www.safed.org.uk
Transportation Energy Data Book (U.S. Department of Energy, published 2008)
http://www-cta.ornl.gov/data/download27.shtml
SmartWay (US Environmental Protection Agency)
http://www.epa.gov/smartway/
38