Easement
Easement
Easement
Easement”
UNDER
Property Law II & Easement
The right to an easement over a piece of land may be passed on to the beneficiary by means of law, if
they have been using the land parcel over a long period, by a grant or by prescription.
•Right of way
Essentials of Easements
1. Dominant and Servient Heritage
For the enjoyment of right of easement, necessary existence of two properties i.e dominant and
servient heritage is a must. This is because as per the definition, it is the right exercised by the owner
or occupier of one land for enjoying the benefit of his/her land, over the land of some other person.
Dominant and servient heritage cannot be one. Thus, the existence of two properties and that to be
separate from each other is essential.
2. Separate owners
For exercising the right of easements, owners of the two properties shall be different and not a single
person.
3. Beneficial Enjoyment
The object of easements is that the dominant owner enjoys it in a way which includes express and
implied benefits.
4. Positive or Negative
Easements can be both positive or negative. Former refers to a right through which the dominant
owner does some act to exercise the right over the land of the servient owner. Whereas, the latter
denotes an act of prevention. In a negative easement the dominant owner prevents or restricts the
servient owner from doing certain act or acts. In a right of easement an owner of dominant heritage
can do an act or prevent the servient owner from doing something but he cannot bind the servient
owner to do something for him.
The easementary right exists only when two heritages are adjacent to each other. It is a right in rem,
which means a right available against the whole world. Easement as a right is always annexed to the
dominant tenement. It is a right of re-aliena which means a right over a servient tenement and no on
one’s own land.
Classification of Easements
Section 5 of the The Indian Easements Act, 1882 classifies the easements as follows–
Continuous or Discontinuous
Continuous easements are the one whose enjoyment may be continued without the intervention of
any human conduct or act of a man. There is no interference by a man and it adds special quality to
the property. While, on the other hand , right of easement for the enjoyment which an
interference of a man is required is known as discontinuous. In this kind of easement, it is
necessary that a human act is done on the servient heritage.
Apparent or Non- Apparent
An apparent easement is one the existence of which can be seen through a permanent sign. It can be
visible by a careful examination and on reasonable foresightedness. It is also known as express
easement. An inspection is required to check the existence of a right. For example- There is a drain
from A’s land to B’s land and from there it led to an open yard. This can be visible through a clear
inspection and is an apparent easement.
Whereas, a non-apparent easement is just opposite of what apparent easement is. This kind of
easement is not visible through an inspection. There is no permanent sign as such. The right is in use
but is not visible and thus, is known as an invisible easement. For example, A’s right annexed to A’s
land to prevent B from building on his own house. Another example to explain non-apparent
easement is that the right to stop construction over a certain height.
•Right of fishery
Extinction of Easements
Section 37 to 47 of the The Indian Easements Act, 1882, provides for the mode of extinction of
easements.
• Dissolution of Servient Owner’s right
In the situation where the grantor ceases to have any right in the servient tenement because of some
reason, then the right of easements ceases to exist as well. This has been specified under Section 37 of
the Act. For eg- X grants a piece of land to Y for a period of 20 years in the year 1970. In the year
1971, Y imposed an easement in favour of Z. In 1990 Y’s interest came to an end. Thus, easementary
right granted to Z ceases to end as well.
• Expiry of time or happening of an event
When an easement is acquired on certain conditions or for certain purpose or for certain period of
time. On the fulfilment of such condition or purpose or expiry of the time, the right of easement
extinguishes as well as in accordance with Section 6 of the Act.
• Extinction by release
Where in a situation the owner of the dominant heritage releases the right of easement to the servient
owner, the right ceases to exist. Such a release can be both expressly or impliedly made. For eg- P has
a right to discharge water through the eaves to Q’s yard. P authorized Q to construct a building to
such a height as not be able to discharge water. Q builds it and P’s right comes to an end.
• Termination of necessity
When necessity terminates the easement of necessity terminates as well. For example- A grants a
piece of land to B on which easement of necessity for B is the right of his way over A’s land. Later
on, B purchases a part of the A’s land over which he may pass to reach his own land. Here, the
necessity has ended and so does the easement.
• Useless Easements
When easement is of such a nature that is not useful or becomes incapable of being beneficial at any
time or under any circumstances, then the right of easement ends.
• Permanent change in the Dominant Heritage
When the nature of the dominant heritage changes permanently with increase in burden on tenement,
then the right of easement ceases to exist as the purpose of it was the beneficial enjoyment of the
dominant heritage. For example- A’s house is located such that he has a right of way by passing
through B’s house. Later, due to earthquake, B’s house got cut off and thus, right of easement ends.
• Extinction by destruction of either of heritages
When either of heritages gets destroyed, the easement ends as it is essential for two properties to exist
for exercising the right.
• Unity by ownership
By unity of ownership it is indicated that when one person becomes the owner of both the dominant
and servient heritage then the right of easement terminates. For instance, A has right of easement over
B’s property. Later on, A purchases B’s property and becomes the owner of B’s property. In such a
case, easement extinguishes.
Another example which can be stated her to explain the concept is that A has a right of easement over
B’s land. In future A takes B’s land on rent, here A becomes the occupier of B’s land. Thus, easement
terminates.
Suspension of Easements
Section 49 of the Act provides that easement can be suspended under the following circumstances-
1. An easement is or can be suspended when the dominant owner becomes entitled to the
possession of servient heritage for a limited interest. An example which can be stated here to
explain the concept is that A has a right of easement over B’s land. In future A takes B’s land
on rent, here A becomes the occupier of B’s land. Thus, easement suspends.
2. When the servient owner becomes entitled to the possession of dominant heritage for a
limited interest, the easement is suspended.
Thus, where both the dominant and servient owner becomes one, easement is suspended.
Revival of Easements
Section 51 of the Act provides for the situations wherein easement suspended or extinguished can be
revived, which are as follows-
1. When an easement is extinguished by destruction of either of the heritages then it can be
revived-
• If the heritage is restored in 20 years.
• If the heritage is rebuilt in 20 years
2. In case of unity of ownership, if the unity breaks due to some reason, then easementary right can be
revived and also through an order of a competent court.
Tabular difference between Licenses and Easements
License Easements
Thereafter, modes of acquiring easements has been provided under Section 7 of the said Act
according to which it can acquired through an express grant or is in certain circumstances
considered to be an implied right. If easement is to be acquired through the express grant then such
a clause has to be specifically mentioned in the deed of sale, mortgage or any other deed in
accordance with the mode of transfer. Easements is a right in rem, that is, it is available against the
whole world. It can be subject to limitations as well and can be restrictive too. Easements can be
both positive and negative. Whereas, on the other hand licenses can only be positive in nature.
Further, the Act talks about the provisions regulating the suspension, extinction and revival of the
easements. Also, how easements is different from licenses has been discussed. The article also
explains the concept of licenses along with its essentials. License can be revocable as mentioned in
the Act and irrevocable as mentioned under Section 60 of the Act. They can also be transferred
according to Section 56 of the Act. It is a right in personam which is not available against the whole
world but is granted personally.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
BOOKS USED:
1. J.D Jain- Indian Easement Act- Allahabad Law Agency
WEBSITES USED:-
1. Blog.ipeaders.in
2. Studydoc.com
3. lawcorner.in
BARE ACT USED:-
1. The Easement Act,1882 (Universal Law Publication)