The rubric outlines criteria for evaluating oral presentations across four categories: content, work quality and effort, style/mechanics, and teamwork/time frame. For each category, excellent, good, fair, and poor performance levels are described. An excellent presentation includes all relevant information organized clearly. It shows pride, creativity, and understanding of the topic. Good presentations have sufficient but less well-organized information and effort. Fair presentations lack organization or full information. Poor presentations are missing required elements or have little effort and understanding.
The rubric outlines criteria for evaluating oral presentations across four categories: content, work quality and effort, style/mechanics, and teamwork/time frame. For each category, excellent, good, fair, and poor performance levels are described. An excellent presentation includes all relevant information organized clearly. It shows pride, creativity, and understanding of the topic. Good presentations have sufficient but less well-organized information and effort. Fair presentations lack organization or full information. Poor presentations are missing required elements or have little effort and understanding.
The rubric outlines criteria for evaluating oral presentations across four categories: content, work quality and effort, style/mechanics, and teamwork/time frame. For each category, excellent, good, fair, and poor performance levels are described. An excellent presentation includes all relevant information organized clearly. It shows pride, creativity, and understanding of the topic. Good presentations have sufficient but less well-organized information and effort. Fair presentations lack organization or full information. Poor presentations are missing required elements or have little effort and understanding.
The rubric outlines criteria for evaluating oral presentations across four categories: content, work quality and effort, style/mechanics, and teamwork/time frame. For each category, excellent, good, fair, and poor performance levels are described. An excellent presentation includes all relevant information organized clearly. It shows pride, creativity, and understanding of the topic. Good presentations have sufficient but less well-organized information and effort. Fair presentations lack organization or full information. Poor presentations are missing required elements or have little effort and understanding.
CONTENT The presentation includes all Presentation includes all relevant Does not have all of the important The presentation is lacking in required information relevant to the topic in an information, but it is not well- information. There is not enough elements. There are many gaps in 30points organized manner. organized. information presented. Information is information presented. presented in an unorganized manner. Excellent Good Fair Poor The work done exceeds expectations The work was done with good effort Work is done with fair effort, but the Work is done with little effort, quality Work quality and and shows that the students are proud that shows what the students are quality is still not what the group is capable is not what the students are capable of. effort of their work. capable of. It is evident that the group of. It is evident that the work was rushed. It is evident that the work was rushed put effort into the presentation. and little time was spent on the final 20 points product. Work is incomplete. Excellent Good Fair Poor Style/Mechanics The presentation has great creativity The presentation is clear and logical The presentation lacks style and creativity; The presentation lacks a clear and style, and is not just a list of facts and contains facts as well as very few presents adequate information but in a way understanding of the subject matter 15 points or reading of information. mistakes. Good, clear presentation, but that does and has many errors or leaves out vital Viewers and listeners were Wowed. lacks some creativity or clarity. not WOW the viewer. information.
Excellent Good Fair Poor
Presentation The students speak clearly and the The students speak clearly and present There are several confusing moments and No preparation was done for the 20 points audience can tell that the group the information expected. the information presented is not completely presentation and the information that is understands and knows the shared during the presentation. It is obvious presented lacks much of what is information. It is evident that the the group did not rehearse much prior to expected group practiced what would be presentation. said/done. Excellent Good Fair Poor Teamwork / Time The group has worked well together. The group worked well as a team The team did work together but had The group could not work together Frame Responsibilities were shared and overall, and most decisions and difficulty sharing responsibilities. and could not share decisions or disagreements were handled well. responsibilities were shared. Length Disagreements were not resolved, and the responsibilities as was expected. 15 point s Length of presentation is within the of presentation is within the assigned group argued often. Length of Length of presentation is exceeding assigned time limits. time limits. presentation is exceeding the assigned time the assigned time limits. limits.
