HC Report 2015
HC Report 2015
HC Report 2015
Justice R.Sudhakar
In the present information age, an annual report on the work of the High
Court assumes great significance and this important exercise would not have been
feasible without the active and dedicated support of the staff of the Registry. We
sincerely record our profound appreciation to the team with the following caveat:
Errors, if any, are ours and ours alone and not theirs.
Editorial Board
Justice R.Sudhakar
Justice M.M.Sundresh
Justice P.N.Prakash
Photographs - Courtesy
S. Ganesh Kumar, Section Officer
K. Singaram, Section Officer
V. Venkatasubramanian, Assistant Section Officer
Published by
High Court of Madras.
www.hcmadras.tn.nic.in
Madras High Court V
From the Desk of The Chief Justice
Judiciary is the quintessential part of a healthy
democracy. The importance of judiciary in a democratic
setup can hardly be exaggerated. Courts and Judges not
only administer justice, they also protect the rights of
the citizens, acting as interpreters and guardians of the
Constitution. It is quite natural that the citizenry looks
at Courts as the last resort for getting their grievances
ventilated.
This Court is one of the very few institutions, which while still holding on to its classic past,
symbolized by the majestic edifice standing tall ever since 1892 amidst the din and chaos of this
bustling metropolis, yet has not lost sight of the need to fine tune itself to suit the modern day
requirements. If I may say so, our High Court is one of the best examples of tradition and orthodoxy
rubbing shoulders with the contemporary.
Although it is not easy to emulate the high standards set by our illustrious predecessors, our
High Court is trying its best to keep in tandem with the huge expectations, given the limited resources
available at hand. I am proud to say that our High Court finds a place among the few Courts in the
country consistently achieving higher rates of disposal, this despite the burgeoning docket and the
dwindling strength.
Special impetus has been given to target specific categories of cases, in particular very old cases,
and physical verification of all case files was carried out in order to identify the actual pendency. Specific
days in the week are earmarked to deal with old cases in the High Court and in the subordinate judiciary
– subordinate judges are awarded double the units for disposal of cases more than 7 years old and triple
the units for disposal of cases more than 15 years old. This has resulted in a marked improvement in
the disposal rate of old cases. A Committee has been constituted to look into the arrears of cases and
to address ways and means to reduce the arrears. Periodic follow-up meetings are conducted in this
behalf with the subordinate courts in all the districts by Video Conferencing, yielding good results. The
process of amending/ simplifying the Madras High Court Original Side Rules and Appellate Side Rules
is on, with suggestions invited from the Bar. There are also plans to constitute a Commercial Division
and Commercial Appellate Division in the High Court to expedite hearing/disposal of commercial
cases, in terms of the Government of India Ordinance dated 23.10.2015.
The Madras High Court is on the right path in achieving its long term objective of full
computerization. With the provision of iPads, Meetings of the Judges of various Committees like
the Administrative Committee and Full Court have gone paperless. State of the art Display Boards
are installed in all court halls and at vantage points inside the High Court campus. The Biometric
Attendance System and the Web Payroll System have been put in place. Bar Coding is done for
fresh cases and SMS alerts are being sent at the filing/copy application stage, and this has been
well received by the Bar. The process of Digitization is set on a roll, the final nod being awaited
from the Government.
At the subordinate level, the outdated desktops/laptops and related peripherals have been
replaced by new ones, with provision of on-line journals. The e-Courts Project, which covers 980
Courts across the State, is in the final phase of implementation. The Case Information System is fully
functional, and there is auto-generation of cause-lists, hosting of judgments and enlisting pendency/
disposal statistics of all categories of cases.
As regards infrastructure, with financial support from the State Government, Court Buildings
and Judicial Officers’ Quarters with requisite basic amenities are being provided in the subordinate
judiciary. In the High Court, new Administrative Blocks have been added to accommodate various
sections of the Registry. Keeping in tune with the changing times, usage of alternative power resources
is being explored with the setting up of rooftop solar power plants at the Principal Seat. Judicial staff is
now assured of priority in the matter of getting accommodation on par with Government Servants.
The Heritage Structures within the High Court premises are getting due attention, with the
funds allocated under the XIII Finance Commission being utilized for their renovation and restoration.
Further funds are sought from the State Government in this regard. Certain tasks have already been
accomplished and once the remaining works are completed, the High Court will be back in its old
resplendent glory. Heritage Walks within the High Court premises are a regular feature.
Our High Court has been a pioneer in exploring and implementing all possible forms of Alternative
Dispute Resolution mechanisms. Following the successful running of the High Court Mediation &
Conciliation Centre, the High Court has now got a state of the art Arbitration Centre, inaugurated
by the then Chief Justice of India in March, 2015, based on the Delhi and Chandigarh modules, with
its own sets of Rules. The Centre has already started receiving good response and I am sure it will
prove to be yet another value addition to the existing ADR mechanism in the State. These efforts
have yielded great results with 11,53,890 cases being disposed of throughout the State in the year
2015 by means of ADR.
The year 2015 heralded a whiff of fresh air with a revamped security system being implemented
in the High Court premises after it was declared a High Security Zone. Now, the Central Industrial
I must admit, all this would not have been possible without the unstinted co-operation of my
learned Brother and Sister Judges, Members of various Committees as well as the Members of the
Bar and the Registry, and I wholeheartedly thank them all.
Last year, we witnessed unprecedented rains and floods in the State of Tamil Nadu, the city of
Chennai bearing its brunt. This colossal event saw humanity coming out in full vigour, cutting across
caste, religious and communal barriers, when strangers came to the rescue of the distressed. Our High
Court did its bit to offer solace to its affected employees and other victims of the floods by providing
essential relief materials, with contributions forthcoming from the Bench, Bar and Staff alike.
I express my sincere gratitude to the Members of the Editorial Committee and commend their
efforts in bringing out this Annual Report in its present shape.
• Establishment...............................................................................................28
• Infrastructure...............................................................................................33
• Computerization..........................................................................................45
• Budget..........................................................................................................49
• Statistics.....................................................................................................105
Born on : 26.12.1958
Elevated as a Judge of Delhi High Court on 03.05.2001.
Was Acting Chief Justice of Delhi High Court from 23.9.2012 to 25.9.2012
Elevated as Chief Justice of Punjab & Haryana High Court on 1.6.2013.
Assumed charge as the Chief Justice of Madras High Court on 26.07.2014.
Hon’ble Mr. Justice M. Jaichandren
Born on : 25.02.1955
Elevated as Judge, High Court of Madras on 10.12.2005.
Hon’ble Mr. Justice V. Ramasubramanian
Born on : 30.06.1958
Elevated as Judge, High Court of Madras on 31.07.2006.
Hon’ble Mr. Justice M. Venugopal
Born on : 07.05.1957
Elevated as Judge, High Court of Madras on 12.11.2007.
Hon’ble Mr. Justice C.T. Selvam
Born on : 09.02.1957
Elevated as Judge, High Court of Madras on 31.03.2009.
Hon’ble Mr. Justice P.N. Prakash
Born on : 12.01.1961
Elevated as Judge, High Court of Madras on 25.10.2013.
Hon’ble Mrs. Justice Pushpa Sathyanarayana
Born on : 28.02.1960.
Elevated as Judge, High Court of Madras on 25.10.2013.
Hon’ble Mr. Justice S. Vaidyanathan
Born on : 17.08.1962
Elevated as Judge, High Court of Madras on 25.10.2013.
Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.S. Ravi
Born on : 20.05.1954
Elevated as Judge, High Court of Madras on 25.10.2013.
Hon’ble Mr. Justice G. Chockalingam
Born on : 01.04.1955
Elevated as Judge, High Court of Madras on 25.10.2013.
Hon’ble Selvi. Justice V.M. Velumani
Born on : 06.04.1962
Elevated as Judge, High Court of Madras on 20.12.2013.
Hon’ble Mr. Justice R.S. Ramanathan
Born on : 16.06.1953.
Elevated as Judge, High Court of Madras on 31.03.2009.
Retired on 15.06.2015.
Hon’ble Mrs. Justice Aruna Jagadeesan
Born on : 26.03.1953
Elevated as Judge, High Court of Madras on 31.03.2009.
Retired on 25.03.2015.
Hon’ble Selvi. Justice K.B.K. Vasuki
Born on : 09.09.1953
Elevated as Judge, High Court of Madras on 17.02.2010.
Retired on 08.09.2015.
Hon’ble Mr. Justice R. Karuppiah
Born on : 07.04.1953
Elevated as Judge, High Court of Madras on 20.12.2011.
Retired on 06.04.2015.
Composition
An amended Letters Patent was issued in the year 1865, by which the High Court was to consist
of a Chief Justice and not more than 15 regular Judges. As per the High Courts Act, 1911, later by
Government of India Act, 1915, the maximum number of Judges shall be twenty. The said sanctioned
Location
The High Court of Judicature at Madras came into existence on 15th August, 1862 in a building
just opposite the Madras Harbour on the First Line Beach, which later became the Collectorate of
Madras, and now known as Singaravelar Maaligai. The construction of the High Court buildings (in
the present location at Netaji Subash Chandra Bose Road, just north of Fort St.George) began in the
year 1888 under the guidance of the famous Architect Henry Irwin and was completed at the cost
of Rs.12,98,163/-, and inaugurated formally on 12.7.1892, by the then Governor of Madras - Baron
Wenlock. The Chief Justice then was Sir Arthur Collins. During the second world war, when Madras
itself was attacked by a squad of bombing aeroplanes in April 1942, the High Court was closed in
advance of its usual date of closure and all the records and valuable papers were rushed to Coimbatore
and Anantapur far away from the possibility of attack. The vacation Courts were held in Coimbatore
in the building of the Forest College. Finally, in or about the month of July, the High Court started
functioning after vacation, but not in the present building. The High Court Appellate and Criminal
Sides and all their offices were located at Thiagaraya Nagar in the Convent of Holy Angels Anglo Indian
School in Mambalam. A separate bungalow on the opposite side of the road was engaged to house
the Original Side and two courts and officers. It took more than a year for all the records to be brought
back to their old places in the High Court buildings and start functioning.
Jurisdiction
The High Court, at the inception, was to have and exercise all such civil, criminal, admiralty
and vice-admiralty, testamentary, intestate and matrimonial jurisdiction, original and appellate, and
all such powers and authority for and in relation to the administration of justice in the Presidency
for which it was established. The High Court was given the power of superintendence over all other
courts within its appellate jurisdiction. The High Courts Act, 1865 empowered the Governor General
in Council to alter the local limits of jurisdiction of the High Courts. In pursuance of 1865 Act, fresh
Letters Patent were issued revoking the Letters Patent of 1862. But it was declared by the Amended
Letters Patent, dated 28th December 1865 that, notwithstanding the revocation of the Letters Patent
of 1862, the High Court of Judicature at Madras was to continue to be a Court of Record.
The Indian High Courts Act of 1911 conferred the power to establish new High Courts within
the Indian domain. The Indian High Courts Acts of 1861 and 1911 were repealed by the Government
of India Act, 1915. Then came the Government of India Act, 1935 providing for the constitution of a
Federal Court in India with Appellate Jurisdiction over the High Courts in India.
After India gained independence and the adoption of the Constitution on January 26, 1950, the
Federal Court was superseded by the Supreme Court of India. The State of Madras was bifurcated in
1953 under the Andhra State Act and a separate High Court of Andhra was established with jurisdiction
over thirteen districts. The High Court of Andhra was formed on 5th July, 1954, which resulted in the
strength of the Judges of the Madras High Court getting reduced to 12 by the Notification of the
Government of India, dated 3rd July 1954.
The States Re-organisation Act, 1956, further reduced the number of districts under the Appellate
Jurisdiction of the Madras High Court. At about the same time, namely, 1954, there was a move for
the abolition of the original civil jurisdiction of the Madras High Court. But it failed and the High Court
continues to retain, even till date, the original civil jurisdiction. However, a similar attempt for the
abolition of the original criminal jurisdiction of the High Court succeeded in 1955, bringing to an end
the Sessions Jurisdiction of the High Court.
Subsequent to the agreement signed between India and France for the de facto transfer of
French Territories, including Pondicherry, to India, in October, 1954, by virtue of the Pondicherry
(Administration) Act, 1962, the jurisdiction of the High Court got extended to Pondicherry with effect
from 06.11.1962.
Madurai Bench
It is common knowledge that our High Court with its two Benches, Chennai and Madurai, has
been holding fort since 2015 with a downsized quorum, yet we can say proudly that matters of public
interest were never put in the back burner. We have indubitably contributed in immense measure
for the development of law by delivering judgments of legal importance. Since the request from
the Central Government is only in respect of matters of public importance, we have catalogued the
following cases as falling under this category:
1. Strikes, gharoes and dharna by advocates became endemic and started paralysing the Court
system. It inhibited free access to justice for seekers and public. The local police had their
own reasons to dither. When pushed to the wall, the First Bench stepped in to salvage the
situation by registering a Suo-motu W.P. No.29197 of 2015 dated 14.9.2015 directing the
Central Government to provide CISF security cover to the Madras High Court. Almost instantly,
Peace and tranquillity has returned to the campus paving the way for public to have access to
the Court system without any let or hindrance. When the order was challenged, the Supreme
Court did not relent and instead remarked that, if required, even the service of the Army can
be requisitioned for protecting the Court system.
2. Encroachment, wherever there is and whoever causing it, has been consistently frowned upon
by this Court without giving room for real estate sharks to proliferate. A Full Bench presided over
by the Chief Justice held that, tanks and waterbodies which do not fall within the purview of the
Tamil Nadu Protection of Tanks and Eviction of Encroachment Act, 2007, also require protection
from encroachment, and encroachers thereon should also be removed by the State authorities
by following the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 - T.K.Shanmugam,
Secretary, CPI(M) v. The State of Tamil Nadu, (2015 WLR 1029).
3. The Claim of teaching and non-teaching staff of private unaided institutions for salary on par
with that of their counterparts in State run institutions was negatived by a Full Bench of this
Court, headed by the Chief Justice in The Correspondent/Principal, Arokiamada Matriculation
Higher Secondary School v. T.Sorubarani (2015 (6) CTC 129), holding that the Education Code
is only an enabling provision and has no statutory flavour.
4. Even those who approach Tribunals constituted under various enactments, require the luxury of
their case being decided by people with legal qualifications, lest travesty of justice should befall.
This is the linchpin of the judgment in Shamnad Basheer v. Union of India and Others (2015 (6)
MLJ. 144), where this Court has held that a Technical Member with the qualifications prescribed
under Section 116(2) of the Patents Act, cannot be appointed to the post of Chairman and
Vice-Chairman in the Intellectual Property Appellate Board.
6. Can a student, who had passed the Higher Secondary State Board examination previously,
compete with current year passers for admission into MBBS/BDS courses was the issue hotly
contested in Minor Kabhilan v. State of Tamil Nadu ((2015) 6 MLJ 69). This Court repelled the
contention and held that Section 2(g) of the Tamil Nadu Admission in Professional Educational
Institutions Act, 2006 does not disqualify candidates who had passed the Higher Secondary
Board examinations in the yesteryears to compete with the freshers.
7. In State of Tamil Nadu v. S.Tharvees Maideen (2015 (5) LW 597) this Court while interpreting
the provisions of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 and National Investigation Act,
2008, held that constitution of Special Court is not a penal provision, but a procedural one
and therefore upheld the power of the State Government to constitute a Special Court under
Section 22 of the National Investigation Act, 2008.
8. Obtaining public employment with questionable certificates is a malaise, which has not spared
judicial appointment(s) also. Explanation was called for from a Civil Judge about the genuineness
of the certificates that were submitted at the time of appointment, which was questioned in
R.Rani v. The Registrar General (W.P.No.15691 of 2015 dated 4.6.2015, MANU/TN/1490/2015).
This Court rejected the plea and directed the Judicial Officer to submit her explanation as that
would not cause any prejudice as was apprehended by her.
9. In Vaiko v. The Chief Secretary, Government of Tamil Nadu (WP(MD)Nos.16485 & 16645 of
2015 dated 28.10.2015) this Court passed several orders as continuous mandamus to remove
Seemai Karuvela Trees (prosopis juliflora) from water bodies and also prepare a scheme with
various departments to enlighten the public about the deleterious effect of the said trees.
10. In M. Saravanan v. The Principal Secretary, Department of Forests and Environment, (WP(MD)
No.3633 of 2014, dated 10.8.2015, a Division Bench passed series of orders for restoration
of Shola forests, forests, grass lands, etc., in order to preserve indigenous species, which are
becoming extinct on account of denudation of the Shola forest.
11. In M.Mohamed Abbas v. The Chief Secretary, Government of Tamil Nadu, (2015 (4) CTC 132)
a Division Bench has held that Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006, is a Secular Law and is
12. Sri Sundaramahalingam Temple, located in the picturesque Sathuragiri Hills on the Western
Ghats, got the attention of this Court in T.Nellaikumar v. The State of Tamil Nadu (2015 (5) LW
420) wherein several directions have been issued to the Government to provide basic amenities
to pilgrims climbing the arduous hill.
13. In B.Ashok v. The Secretary, Ministry of Union Law and Justice, Government of India, ((2015)
6 MLJ 385), a Division Bench of this Court quashed the order of the State Government directing
Dr.Ambedkar Law University to prescribe ‘no age limit’ for three year law degree course and
upper age limit of 21 years (except for SC/ST candidates) for 5 year integrated Law degree course
in Government Law Colleges and in the Law University on the ground that the said Government
Order was passed without following the provisions of the Advocates Act, 1961 and the rules
framed thereunder.
14. Victims of road accidents have now received a boon against the tyranny and apathy of the Police
administration in Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Sathikbasha and another (CMA
No.933/2015, dated 28.10.2015). The instrumentalities of State have been directed to follow
the standard operating procedure under Sec.158(5) of the M.V. Act due to which the victims
can get quick justice and bogus claims can be thwarted.
15. The ghost of the infamous Pandiammal, who appeared before a Sessions Court that was
conducting a trial against three accused for allegedly murdering her in the eighties of the last
century keeps haunting frequently. In V. Koilpillai v. State of Tamil Nadu, 2015 (4) CTC 561, four
persons faced prosecution for the murder of one Manimegalai, but were eventually acquitted by
the trial Court on 20.2.2007. Thereafter, Manimegalai surfaced, which prompted the acquitted
accused to knock the doors of this Court for justice. After a detailed enquiry, this Court ordered
the Government to pay Rs.4 lakhs as compensation to each of the accused, who had faced arrest
and prosecution for the alleged murder of Manimegalai.
16. In People’s Union for Civil Liberties v. State of Maharashtra, (2014) 10 SCC 635, the Supreme
Court issued several directions to deal with cases arising out of Police encounters. One such
direction empowered the family of the victim to make a complaint to the Sessions Judge having
18. Are sons alone the guardian angels of parents and thereby entitled to compassionate appointment,
though married, was the question that was determined in A.Vimala v. The Secretary to
Government & Others, (W.P.No.20437 of 2015, dated 9.7.2015). This Court held that, even
married daughters are entitled to compassionate appointment in Government service.
19. In In Re. v. State & Others, ((2015) 4 MLJ (Crl) 263), this Court has issued a slew of directions
to safeguard child abuse by perverts and has also suggested several far reaching measures to
curb the menace for safeguarding posterity.
20. The fall out of head injury in road accidents was deeply probed into, and after collecting empirical
data, in R.Mallika & Others v. A.Babu & Others, (2015 (4) CTC 644), a learned single Judge
issued directions to the State instrumentalities including Police, to strictly enforce the helmet
rule for riders of two wheelers, in letter and spirit.
21. In K.G.Uthayakumar v. State & Another, (2015 (3) CTC 745), this Court came down heavily
upon the petitioner for taking political discourse to sub-standard levels in the State, when the
petitioner belonging to the ruling party alleged that a prominent leader of the opposition party
had, by using the toilet in the Travellers Bungalow during election campaign, violated the model
code of conduct.
23. In P.Elangovan v. Pondevaki & Others, ((2016) 1 MLJ (Crl) 296) this Court held that the right
of mother to expect her children to maintain her is not merely a statutory, constitutional,
fundamental, natural and moral right, but a basic human right too. The court awarded enhanced
maintenance to the mother to be paid by her well-off sons.
24. The action of the State Government in consolidating the various departments dealing with land
and bringing them under one umbrella for better implementation of land reforms was upheld
in D.Ramalingam v. State of Tamil Nadu, (2015 (3) CTC 353).
25. Remand to police custody on the ipsi-dixit of police that they need to ferret out valuable
information was decided on the anvil of Order IX Rule 3 CPC and section 297 Cr.P.C. in
State, represented by DSP, CBI v. S.Kannan ((2015) 1 L.W. (Crl) 634) and police custody
was negatived by upholding the right of the accused to have a fair investigatory process.
26. In Amrut Distilleries Ltd., v. Authorized Officer & Another ((2015) 2 CTC 521) a distinction
between “Best before” and “Use - by date” in Food Safety and Standards (Packaging and
Labelling) Regulations, 2011 has been held to be real and not illusory and strict adherence to
it in the interest of public safety has been emphasised.
27. The right of a small man, from whom tax was collected dubiously, to have it refunded, is the
theme of the judgment in K.J.Saravanan v. The Chief Secretary & Others ((2016) 8 MLJ 475)
where a theatre owner who enjoyed tax exemption for a film had collected entertainment tax
unjustly from a movie goer.
28. Student indiscipline will not get judicial imprimatur is the crux of the decision in N.Sivaguru v.
State of Tamil Nadu (W.P.(MD)No.9323, 4740 to 4742 of 2015 dated 10.7.2015) wherein this
Court refused to interfere and set aside the suspension of Law College students for their acts
of indiscipline.
What we have showcased above is only the tip of the ice berg and a great volume of legal
literature produced during 2015 is available in public domain.
Before concluding this catalogue, we quote from ‘Judges’ by David Pannick, “The judge has
burdensome responsibilities to discharge. He has power over the lives and livelihood of all those
litigants who enter his Court. He may accidentally cause a peaceful, but fundamental change in the
political complexion of the Country.” As before, the Madras High Court will always be in the vanguard
of social change for the betterment of human society.
Here is a modest attempt taken to retrace the imprints of events that marked the quest for
Justice, this High Court is destined to lead, in the year 2015.
The western half of the campus, comprising City Civil Courts, Courts of Small Causes, Special
Courts and quasi judicial forum / tribunals was let to be retained by Tamil Nadu State Police which
continued to be responsible for its security.
A contingent of 450 CISF personnel achieved a remarkable and relatively better atmosphere
of peace and tranquillity far from the huge crowd which perceived to be an associated attribute of
environs of the High Court, not so long ago. Now, the parking stands regulated, intruders and aimless
wanderers are restricted and the casual visitors are restrained. In this ‘change of guard’ the High Court
has earned the rare distinction of being the only High Court in the entire country, whose security is
taken over by a Paramilitary force.
Entry into the High Court campus by all the stake holders has been regulated through Door
Frame Metal Detectors, Hand held Detectors, Baggage Scanners, Frisking Booths, Gate Pass Centres
and other utilities, in the aftermath of introduction of CISF Security. However, the senior citizens,
differently abled, law students, parties-in-person have the privilege of separate counters provided
for them.
Constitution of Courts
The organic growth of courts is found to be concomitant to the decentralisation of Justice.
Hence, as many as 40 courts were sanctioned, in three years alone, i.e., from 2012 to 2014, 8 courts
have become operational in the year 2015.
Close on the heels of the efforts to dispense qualitative Justice, through decentralisation of
Judicial Academy, the quantitative reinforcement of judicial workforce has also been taken care of in
Judicial Academy,
Coimbatore
Judicial Academy,
Madurai
In the High Court itself, 429 additional posts across the cadres were sanctioned, in consonance
with the increased Judge strength from 42 to 60. In anticipation of further enhancement of judges
strength, 15 attached posts and 79 non-attached posts have also been sanctioned. Besides, a total
number of 108 technical personnel have been sanctioned towards the computerization of High Court.
To clear the backlog vacancies, for the first time, in the history of the Madras High Court, we
have taken the assistance of TNPSC to recruit 172 candidates in various cadres, viz., Personal Assistant
to the Hon’ble Judges, Computer Operator, Assistant and Typist.
Infrastructure
Any institution without training, would suffer intellectual atrophy. To alleviate such atrophy,
the Tamil Nadu State Judicial Academy at Chennai was set to have its regional siblings, waiting to
open their doors at Coimbatore and Madurai. The staff and other infrastructure facilities have been
sanctioned in the year 2015. With the coming up of Regional Judicial Academies at Coimbatore and
Madurai, the training programmes will no longer mean absence of many Judicial Officers from their
respective Headquarters on account of reduction of time to reach the Academy at Chennai.
Madras High Court Arbitration Centre has come into reality with the opening of state of art
premises in the newly constructed building on the western fringes of High Court campus on 28.03.2015.
The Arbitration Centre having taken a leaf out of each of the best specimens in the genre has become
a sterling example of what a court attached Arbitration Centre can do.
In order to create a safe and comfortable environment by keeping the campus in order, neat and
clean, 5S principle (sort, straighten, shine, standardize and sustain) has been adhered to. December
of every year has been observed as Cleanliness Awareness month.
Staff Welfare
When the Chennai city faced the
torrential rain during November and
December, 2015, the staff of the High Court,
who were residing in the flood hit areas, lost
all their belongings, as their houses sunk
in floods. A Team consisting of Hon’ble
Judges, Officers and staff rushed to the
rescue of the staff and distributed food and
other relief materials on the spot.
The Tamil Nadu State Legal Services
Authorities and the advocates took up the
task of addressing the problem of the staff, who were preparing themselves to start their life from
scratch. Concern and care poured in from the Hon’ble Judges and the Bar Association of the Supreme
Court and from all concerns. The relief materials consisting of 50 items of grocery, household articles,
utensils, dress materials and medicine were distributed to approximately 1200 staff members of the
High Court and other Courts and Offices situated within the Campus. The relief and rehabilitation
measures were extended to small villages in and around the Cuddalore Districts also.
A Medical Camp was organized to the staff as a preventive measure to protect them from water
and air borne diseases organized by a team of doctors sent by the Director of Medical Education,
Government of Tamil Nadu.
Thus, the year 2015 has proved to be a memorable one for the surprises, achievements and land
mark events with which the judiciary has crossed another mile stone in the annals of legal history.
PRL. SEAT MADURAI BENCH TNSJA , MDS TNSJA, CBE TNSJA, MDU
VACANT
VACANT
VACANT
VACANT
VACANCY
WORKING
WORKING
WORKING
WORKING
WORKING
SANCTIONED
SANCTIONED
SANCTIONED
SANCTIONED
SANCTIONED
1 INTERPRETER 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 CO/SO/AE 225 175 50 75 57 18 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 70
3 P.A. TO THE HON’BLE JUDGES 187 117 70 54 38 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 86
4 P.S. TO REGR. GENERAL 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5 TECHNICAL ASSISTANT LIBRARIAN 4 4 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6 ASST. SECTION OFFICER 287 257 30 80 74 6 5 5 0 2 0 2 2 0 2 40
7 PERSONAL ASSISTANT TO REGISTRAR 7 3 4 2 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 7
8 PERSONAL CLERK TO DEPUTY REGISTRAR 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
9 SENIOR TYPIST 24 21 3 4 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
10 COMPUTER OPERATOR 60 32 28 30 22 8 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 38
11 ASSISTANT 191 134 57 68 56 12 3 3 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 71
12 TYPIST 152 117 35 61 45 16 2 2 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 53
13 TELEPHONE OPERATOR 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
14 CASHIER 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
15 READER/EXAMINER 95 54 41 34 22 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 53
16 XEROX OPERATOR 6 4 2 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
17 OVERSEER 2 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
18 HEAD BAILIFF 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
19 SERGEANT 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
20 DRIVER 88 77 11 27 22 5 4 3 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 19
PRL. SEAT MADURAI BENCH TNSJA , MDS TNSJA, CBE TNSJA, MDU
Sl
No. NAME OF THE POST
VACANT
VACANT
VACANT
VACANT
VACANT
OVERALL
VACANCY
WORKING
WORKING
WORKING
WORKING
WORKING
SANCTIONED
SANCTIONED
SANCTIONED
SANCTIONED
SANCTIONED
21 JUNIOR BAILIFF 24 20 4 7 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6
22 COURT KEEPER 3 2 1 3 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
23 JAMEDAR 2 1 1 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
24 GOLLAH 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
25 BINDER 10 7 3 4 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
26 RECORD ASSISTANT 10 8 2 4 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
27 RECORD CLERK 81 62 19 20 12 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27
28 LIFT OPERATOR 10 8 2 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
29 DUFFADAR 10 6 4 5 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5
30 WATCH & WARD 50 45 5 36 29 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12
31 OFFICE ASSISTANT 429 353 76 139 119 20 5 5 0 3 0 3 3 0 3 102
32 SWEEPER 32 30 2 19 15 4 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 8
33 SCAVENGER 11 7 4 16 12 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8
34 GARDENER 15 12 3 13 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
35 WATERMAN 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
36 WATCHMAN 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 2
37 ROOM BOY 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 2
38 SANITARY WORKER 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 2
39 SWEEPER/SCAVENGER 32 0 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32
31
Subordinate Judiciary
Sanctioned strength, Working strength and Vacancies as on 31.12.2015
S.No.
Name of the District 2015
Sanctioned Working Vacancies
strength strength
1 Chennai (City Civil Court) 794 694 100
C.S.C 175 105 70
C.M.M. 394 310 84
AG & OT 35 25 10
Industrial Tribunal 13 10 3
Labour Court 77 63 14
EC & NDPS 35 29 6
City Govt. Pleader 16 13 3
2 Coimbatore 748 625 123
3 Cuddalore 748 629 119
4 Dharmapuri 384 318 66
5 Dindigul 536 415 121
6 Erode 653 525 128
7 Kanniyakumari 525 483 42
8 Kancheepuram 540 463 77
9 Karur 327 283 44
10 Krishnagiri 424 350 74
11 Madurai 780 667 113
12 Nagapattinam 461 399 62
13 Namakkal 380 292 88
14 Nilgiris 288 232 56
15 Perambalur 162 137 25
16 Pudukkottai 271 241 30
17 Ramanathapuram 405 330 75
18 Salem 804 755 49
19 Sivaganga 442 360 82
20 Thanjavur 625 604 21
21 Theni 351 295 56
22 Thoothukudi 439 384 55
23 Trichy 695 558 137
24 Tirunelveli 748 618 130
25 Tiruvannamalai 496 383 113
26 Tiruvallur 638 512 126
27 Tiruvarur 377 334 43
28 Vellore 917 764 153
29 Villupuram 832 692 140
30 Virudhunagar 521 388 133
31 Ariyalur 257 232 25
32 Tiruppur 509 342 167
Total 17822 14859 2963
• The Madras High Court is housed in the old and annexe buildings - the old building built in the
year 1892 and the annexe, during the year 1996.
• The old building has a ground and two floors and the annexe building has ground plus three
floors.
• 53 Judges’ Chambers including the Hon’ble Chief Justice’s, 37 Court Halls, various sections
on the Judicial, Administrative and Technical sides, Library, Meeting and Conference Halls,
National Informatics Centre, Museum, Office of the Advocate General, Information Centre, etc.,
are housed in the old and the annexe building.
• Offices of the Official Assignee, Administrator General & Official Trustee, Public Prosecutor, and
Government Pleaders are also situated within the campus.
• The Arbitration Centre is functioning in the First Floor of the Record Building (IX Floor)
• The Administrative Block, and the Auditorium & Museum are newly built and are ready for
occupation.
• There are 16 Court Halls and Judges’ chambers attached to Court Halls, Library, Conference Hall
with Video Conferencing System, Projector, etc., 12 bungalows, VIP Guest House, Law Office
Building, Lawyers Chambers’ Buildings, 9 shops, Staff Canteen, BSNL, Post Office, Indian Bank
and Advocates Canteen, within the campus.
• There is a ‘Kanmoi’ (tank) and it has in it a variety of fishes. Variety of birds like Peacock, Lesser
whistling duck, spot billed Duck, Glossy Ibis, Yellow Bitten, etc., are living / visiting the Premises
of the Madurai Bench.
Sign boards, Kiosks and Display Boards are placed at prominent places of the High Court of
Madras – both at the Principal Seat and at Madurai Bench for the easy access of the Advocates
and litigant public.
Sanctioned
Sl. No. G.O. Number & Date Purpose Amount (Rupees
in lakhs)
Home amount
courts
No. of
No.of
4 G.O. (D) No.94, Home (Cts. Replacement of the Photocopy Machine in the 1.21
III) Department, dated place of existing photocopy machine available
10.02.2015. in the Principal District Court, Virudhunagar
District at Srivilliputtur.
5 G.O. Ms. No.97 dated 10.02.2015 Provision of Generator facilities to the 684.21
(in continuation of G.O. Ms. Subordinate Courts in the State of Tamil 1087.78
No.799 dated 6.11.2014) Nadu Sanctioned
during 2014
6 G.O.(Ms) No.135, Home Furniture and Photocopy Machine for the newly Furniture 2.67
(Courts-II) Department, constituted separate Judicial Magistrate Court at & Photocopy
dated 17.02.2015. Sulur in Coimbatore District. Machine 1.00
8 G.O.(Ms) No.200, Home Furniture for the newly constituted Separate 1.75
(Courts-II) Department, Judicial Magistrate Court at Bodinayakanur in
dated 27.02.2015. Theni District by converting the existing District
Munsif – Cum - Judicial Magistrate Court,
Bodinayakanur in Theni District
9 G.O. (D) No. 143, Home Replacement of Photocopy Machine in the 1.10
(Cts.III) Department, dated place of existing Photocopy Machine for use
02.03.2015. in the District Court, Tiruvarur.
10 G.O.(Ms). No. 225, Home Furniture / Photocopy machine / Fax 1.00 (Furn)
(Courts-II) Department, Machine and Motor Vehicles for the newly 1.00 (photo
dated 09.03.2015. constituted Two Special Courts in Villupuram copy machine)
and Sivagangai in the Level of District Court 0.25 (Fax)
for exclusive trial of cases registered under 12.68 (2 cars)
SC/ST (POA) Act 1989 by utilizing the Grants-
in-aid recommended by the 13th Finance
Commission.
12 G.O.(Ms) No.260, Home Furniture for the newly constituted Special 2.21
(Courts-III) Department, Court at Coimbatore to try cases filed under
dated 16.03.2015. Domestic Violence Act by utilizing 13th Finance
Commission Grants-in-aid.
14 G.O.(Ms) No.362, Home Purchase of furniture for use in the newly 4.00
(Courts-III) Department, constituted Sub Court, Tiruchendur in
dated 27.04.2015. Thoothukudi District.
17 G.O. (2D).No.207, Home Provision of Fire Extinguishers for use in the 0.18
(Courts-III) Department, Fast Track Court (Magisterial level), Vellore,
dated 08.06.2015. Vellore District.
• Replacement of the existing staff car, for the use of Chief Judicial
Magistrate Court, Thanjavur District at Kumbakonam and the Chief
Judicial Magistrate Court, Kanniyakumari District at Nagercoil.
• Furniture for the use in the Judicial Magistrate Courts No.I and II,
Tiruvallur, Principal, I & II Additional Special Courts under E.C. &
N.D.P.S. Act, proposed new combined court complex at Harur, Family
Courts, Chennai, Principal, I, II and III Additional Labour Courts,
Chennai and the Courts in Cuddalore.
• Photocopy machine for the use of the Court of Small Causes, Chennai,
XI Additional City Civil and Sessions Court for CBI Cases, Chennai and
II Additional District Court for CBI Cases, Madurai.
• All the Registrars and Joint Registrars in the High Court are provided with latest version of
Laptops.
• All the sections of the Registry have been provided with desktop computers interconnected
through LAN. Computers have also been installed in all the Court Halls, interconnected through
LAN. High End Servers are installed in High Court, Madras to keep pace with the latest technology
and for storage of data and for creation of software.
• Video Conferencing facility between the Principal Seat and the Madurai Bench of Madras High
Court is available.
The final orders and orders passed in bail / anticipatory bail / interim applications are
maintained by the Judgment Information System (JIS).
The website of the High Court now acquired an altogether new dimension through which it
came to take over the mantle of the Right to Information Act. As a proactive disclosure, cause lists,
Citizen charter is hosted in the High Court website for the use of the public to know the location
of the Madras High Court and the entry points, jurisdiction, functions and services available in the
premises.
• Maintenance of profiles, transfer and postings and leave particulars of the Judicial Officers.
• Management of the personal and official data of the Officers and Staff of the Registry.
• Inventory Management System for the IT peripherals purchased under various projects.
• Tapals Management System for the distribution of Tapals to various sections in the Registry.
• Visitors Management System for issuance of visitors pass to litigants and law college students
with bar code and photo capture features.
• Uploading daily proceedings of cases from the Court Halls.
• Maintenance of details of RTI applications and appeals.
• Maintenance of details of ID cards issued to advocates under the comprehensive security
system,
• For the use of the Recruitment Cell.
• Maintenance of the particulars relating to the infrastructure in the subordinate judiciary.
• Maintenance of statistics on disposal of cases and for printing dockets for all cases.
A Steering Committee at each High Court has been formed to oversee the implementation of
the project in their respective High Court.
District Computer Committee in every District and Nodal Officers in each Court Complex has
been constituted. They are instructed to complete the tasks within the time frame fixed by the Hon’ble
e-Committee, Supreme Court of India.
Totally 985 Courts are covered under the e-Courts Project in the State of Tamil Nadu and Union
Territory of Puducherry.
• Hands on training have been provided on Ubuntu Operating System (14.04 version) and Case
Information System (2.0) software to all the Judicial Officers in the State of Tamil Nadu and U.T.
of Puducherry.
• 28 Ubuntu Master Trainers (Judicial Officers) have been selected by the Hon’ble e-Committee,
Supreme Court of India, in the State of Tamil Nadu, to impart training to other Judicial Officers
in the State.
• 30 Staff Members have been trained as Master Trainers on CIS Software, who, in turn, are
imparting training to other staff members.
• Unique Identification Numbers and e-mail IDs have been provided for all the Judicial officers.
• All the Districts have been provided with technical manpower (one System Officer and two
System Assistants)
(Rupees in crores)
Sl. Head of Department
No. Allocation Expenditure
(Rupees in lakhs)
1 2010-11 - - - - -
2 2011-12 - - - - -
30 Crores
of 13th
3 Finance 2012-13 1510.43 1510.43 - - -
Commis-
sion
Funds
4 and 3.20 2013-14 992.86 992.86 - - -
crores of
State
Fund
5 2014-15 325.29 325.29 - - -
51
52
b. Training to Mediators
(Rupees in lakhs)
** Out of the grant of 195.11 lakhs, 194.43 lakhs has been utilized towards the work of establishing Arbitration centre in the High Court campus, Chennai.
C. Lok Adalats and Legal Aid
(Rupees in lakhs)
(Rupees in lakhs)
Fund re-
Funds Financial Funds Funds allocated to Funds
S l. No. allocated Year released ulized surrendered
other
Fundheads
re-
Funds Financial Funds Funds allocated to Funds
S l. No. allocated Year released ulized surrendered
other heads
1. 2010-11 148.30 148.30 - -
53
54
E. State Judicial Academies (Coimbatore & Madurai)
(Rupees in lakhs)
Funds re-
Funds Financial Funds Funds allocated Funds
S l. No. allocated Year released ulized to other surrendered
heads
Funds ulized
Funds re-
Funds Financial Funds Funds
S l. No. allocated to
allocated Year released Final surrendered
Expenditure other heads
Expenditure
Funds re-
Funds Financial Funds Funds allocated to Funds
Sl. No. allocated released ulized surrendered
Year other heads
1. 2010-11 - - - -
2. 2011-12 - - - -
3. 22.24 2012-13 - - - -
4. Crores 2013-14 - - - -
5. 2014-15 - - -
6. 2015-16 1300.00 207.68 - -
Note: Statement given as per the expenditure upto 12/2015
Funds re-
Funds Financial Funds Funds allocated to Funds
Sl. No. allocated Year released ulized surrendered
other heads
1. 2010-11 0 0 - 0
2. 2011-12 326.08 0 - 326.08
16.30
3. 2012-13 337.01 24.83 - 312.18
Crores
4. 2013-14 622.56 181.53 - 441.03
55
CoNSTITUTION OF COURTS / SANCTION OF POSTS
DETAILS OF COURTS SANCTIONED BY THE GOVERNMENT DURING THE YEAR 2015
3 Sanction of funds for Additional Court Halls, Chambers, Out of 195 attached posts, the
Staff, Furniture, Car, Computer, etc,, for enhancement Government have sanctioned only 15
of 15 Additional Judges. posts and out of 386 non-attached
posts, only 79 posts have been
sanctioned by the Government.
G.O.Ms.No.407, Home (Cts.IV)
Department dated 14.05.2015.
2 Honorarium to be paid to the Judicial Officers and staff G.O.(2D) No.275, Home
members of the 4 Holiday Family Courts at Chennai for the (Cts.II) Department, dated
year 2015-16 13.08.2015 and G.O.(2D)
No.319, Home (Cts.
II) Department, dated
16.09.2015. (amendment)
• Constitution of an Additional District and Sessions Court at Srivilliputhur to conduct the cases
relating to SC/ST (POA) Act, 1989 in Virudhunagar District.
• Constitution of Family Courts for 15 Districts, under the grants of the 14 th Finance
Commission.
• Constitution of separate District Munsif Courts at Vedasandur in Dindigul District and Sivagiri
in Tirunelveli District.
• Constitution of a Fast Track Court at Magisterial Level for trial of cases under N.I. Act at Saidapet
in Chennai District.
• Constitution of a Special Court to exclusively deal with the N.I. Act cases in Tirunelveli
District.
• Constitution of Fast Track Court at Magisterial Level at Eraniel by shifting the existing Fast Track
Court at Magisterial Level at Nagercoil.
• Constitution of Special Court at Villupuram for trial of NDPS Act cases in the cadre of District
Judge.
• Creation of Special Court for trying CBI cases relating to Indian Bank Scam cases under 13th
Finance Commission Grants-in-aid.
• Constitution of a Separate Employees Insurance Courts at Chennai and Madurai as per provision
under Section 74 of the E.S.I. Act.
• Holding Mahila Camp Court at Kuzhithurai by the Fast Track Mahila Court, Nagercoil.
• Constitution of (i) one Special Court in the cadre of Judicial Magistrate at Alandur, Kancheepuram
District, for the exclusive trial of the cases relating to Customs Act and other related cases and
(ii) one Additional Mahila Court in the cadre of Judicial Magistrate at Alandur for the trial of
cases relating to offences against women and other cases.
• Constitution of Special Courts to deal with series of cases under investigation by CBCID against
M/s.Gold Quest International Pvt.Ltd – Constitution of special court at Chennai to try the cases
filed under the Prize Chits and Money Circulation Scheme (Banning) Act 1978.
• Constitution of one Mobile Court for the prosecution of Railway Act cases in Chennai Division
of Southern Railway under 13th Finance Commission
• Constitution of 51 Special Magistrate Courts with Civil powers to try the petty cases one at each
Taluk, where no court is functioning, under the 13th Finance Commission (G.O. issued for 2
Courts at Illuppur and Madathukulam).
• Constitution of Special Court for exclusive trial of land grabbing cases at Chengalpattu.
• Setting up of a Special Court at Chennai to deal with fake stamp papers & Indian currency under
13th Finance Commission Grants-in-aid.
• Conversion of existing District Munsif Court, Pallipattu as District Munsif - cum - Judicial
Magistrate Court, Pallipattu in Tiruvallur District.
• Constitution of separate District Munsif Court at Rajapalayam by shifting the existing Additional
District Munsif Court, Srivilliputhur in Virudhunagar District.
• Constitution of a separate District Munsif Court at Chengam by converting the existing Additional
District Munsif Court, Chengam in Tiruvannamalai District. (G.O. Issued for Constitution of
separate Judicial Magistrate Court at Chengam by converting the existing Prl. District Munsif-
cum-Judicial Magistrate Court, Chengam).
• Constitution of separate District Munsif Court and separate Judicial Magistrate Court by
converting the existing District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate Court, Perundurai in Erode
District.
• Constitution of District Munsif Court at Mettupalayam by bifurcating the existing District Munsif-
cum-Judicial Magistrate Court at Mettupalayam in Coimbatore District.
• Constitution of separate District Munsif Court at Nanguneri by converting the existing Additional
District Munsif Court, Nanguneri in Tirunelveli District. (G.O. Issued for Constitution of separate
Judicial Magistrate Court at Nanguneri by converting the existing Principal District Munsif-cum-
Judicial Magistrate Court, Nanguneri).
• Constitution of separate Judicial Magistrate Court at Tittagudi by converting the existing District
Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate Court, Tittagudi in Cuddalore District.
• Constitution of separate District Munsif Court at Eraniel by converting the existing Principal
District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate Court, Eraniel in Kanniyakumari District.
• Constitution of separate Judicial Magistrate Court at Eraniel by converting the existing Additional
District Munsif Court, Eraniel in Kanniyakumari District.
• Constitution of separate District Munsif Court at Vandavasi by converting the existing Additional
District Munsif Court, Vandavasi and Constitution of separate Judicial Magistrate Court,
Vandavasi by converting the existing Principal District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate Court,
Vandavasi in Tiruvannamalai District.
• Re-designating the District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate Court No.I, Hosur as District Munsif
Court, Hosur in Krishnagiri District.
• One post of Technical Assistant to the Librarian to the Tamil Nadu State Judicial Academy.
• 6 posts of Translator in the cadre of Assistant Section Officer viz., 4 posts for the Principal Seat
at Madras and 2 posts for the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
• Posts required for creation of Internal Audit Units in Judicial Department -- (A) Posts required
for Administrative Wing: Financial Advisor - 2, Chief Accounts Officer - 2, Audit Officer -10,
Audit Superintendent - 8, (Total-22) (to be deputed from Staff Treasury Department). (B) Posts
required for Audit Party: Assistant Registrar -1, Section officer -5, Assistant Section Officer -5,
Computer Operator - 5, Assistant - 5, Office Assistant - 5, (Total -26).
• Consolidated proposal for Sanction of funds for Additional Court Halls, Chambers, Staff, Furniture,
Car, Computers, etc., for the Principal Seat and Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai
in respect of 15 Additional Judges - Earlier proposal reiterated.
• 2 posts of ADSP and 8 posts of DSP (Based on the Directions of the Hon’ble Vigilance Committee)
in the High Court, Madras.
• One post of Sub Assistant Registrar to the Vigilance Cell, High Court, Madras.
Court, Madurai.
• (1) Upgraded posts of Senior Private Secretary to Hon’ble Judges and Private Secretary to
Hon’ble Judges to be made as promotional post by giving nomenclature as Assistant
Registrar-cum-Senior Private Secretary to Hon’ble Judges and Sub Assistant Registrar-cum-
Private Secretary to Hon’ble Judges respectively,
(2) 10 posts of newly upgraded Senior Private Secretary to Hon’ble Judges as Deputy Registrar
-cum- Principal Private Secretary,
(3) 20 posts of newly upgraded Private Secretary to Hon’ble Judges as Assistant Registrar-
cum-Senior Private Secretary and
(4) 30 posts of P.A., to Hon’ble Judges as Sub Assistant Registrar -cum- Private Secretary.
• Upgradation of the posts of Deputy Registrar (AS), Deputy Registrar (OS), Deputy Registrar
(Writs) and Deputy Registrar (Judicial), High Court, Madras to the cadre of Joint Registrar.
• One post of Assistant Registrar, one post of Librarian, one post of Personal Assistant, one post
of Record Keeper, 5 posts of Office Assistant and 3 posts of Sweeper/Sanitary Worker for the
Arbitration Centre along with Head of Account.
• Staff, furniture, car and telephone (both recurring and non-recurring) to the Tamil Nadu
Mediation and Conciliation Centre, High Court, Madras.
• One post of Additional Registrar General in the cadre of District Judge, one post of Additional
Registrar-II (Vigilance) in the cadre of District Judge, one post of Additional Registrar (IT &
Statistics) preferably as promotion post from Joint Registrar and one post of Joint Registrar
(Computers) as promotion post from Deputy Registrar for Madurai Bench of Madras High Court.
The premises of Academy is equipped with sufficient infrastructural facilities, like, an Auditorium,
Library, Lecture Hall, Meeting Hall, Conference Hall (with Multi Point Video Conferencing facility), Board
of Governors’ Meeting Room, Computer Room, Guest Rooms, V.I.P. Suites and Recreation Room.
The chief mission of the Academy is to bring about institutionalised, integrated, and
professionalised system of continued judicial education for justices, judges, court personnel and
lawyers aspiring for judicial position. The objective of imparting training to the Judicial Officers is to
make them competent and sensitive, so that they could keep themselves abreast of the march of law
every now and then, and also help them to face and overcome challenges in their day-to-day work.
The Training Programmes are mainly interactive in nature. Visits to Courts, Police Establishments,
Jails, Revenue Departments including Survey, Railway Protection Force and General Hospitals are also
undertaken.
The website of the Academy contains information regarding the constitution of the Academy,
the details and schedules of the programmes conducted, articles of legal interest, speeches given
during training programmes by eminent Judges and other distinguished guests and the Annual
Calendar. A separate window has also been provided for Gallery, showcasing photographs of the
Training Programmes. The Academy also publishes E-Journal consisting of important judgements of
the Supreme Court and Madras High Court every month for circulation among the Judicial Officers
of the State and the Union Territory.
The Academy has received Rs.15 crores under 13th Finance Commission Grant, towards the Head
“Building of Infrastructure” and the same has been utilized along with the additional grant of Rs.2 crores
from the State Government towards the construction of two Regional Centres, one at Madurai and
the other at Coimbatore. The buildings and the infrastructure facilities of the said Regional Centres are
nearing completion and are proposed to be inaugurated during the third week of February, 2016.
Computer Room
4 Training Programme for Core Group of DSA Master Trainers for 16.03.2015 to 30.03.2015
Training CIS Master Trainers of all the High Courts.
95 DSAs from Tamil Nadu,
Telangana and Andhra
Pradesh and Kerala.
8 Conference on – 13.06.2015
(i) Legal niceties.
(ii) Ethics and Change of Mindset. Principal District Judges and
(iii) Relevant factors for effective administration of Chief Judicial Magistrates,
justice. numbering 79.
(iv) Judges as Learners.
(v) General Administration of District level Courts.
The objects that are to be achieved by the State Legal Services Authority are threefold, viz.,
(i) to make the people aware of their legal rights;
(ii) providing legal services to competent persons; and
(iii) organization of Lok Adalat to reduce the Court pendency.
This Authority follows provisions of Sections 12 and 13 of the Legal Services Authorities Act,
for appointment of Advocates.
As per Rule 17 of the Tamil Nadu State Legal Services Authority Rules, 1997, those, whose upper
limit of income from all sources does not exceed Rs.1,00,000/- are entitled to legal services for filing
a case or defending a case. Court Fee upto Rs.1000/- is paid by the Authority for filing a case. As far
as Petitions for Motor Accident Claims are concerned, advocates are advised to file petitions before
Tribunals seeking fee exemption, at the first instance.
In commemoration of the National and International Days, like, Republic Day (Grama Sabha
Assembly) (26th January), International Women’s Day (8th March), Legal Aid Movement Day (6th
April), International Labour Day (1st May), Anti Tobacco Day (3rd May), World Environment Day (5th
June), World Day against Child Labour (12th June), Independence Day (Grama Sabha Assembly) (15th
August), Senior Citizens Day (1st October), Gandhi Jayanthi (Grama Sabha Assembly) (2nd October),
World Mental Health Day (10th October), National Legal Services Day (9th November), Children’s Day
(14th November), Law Day (26th November), World HIV/AIDS Day (1st December), World Disability
Day (3rd December), Human Rights Day (10th December), camps are being organized.
During the camps, the litigants / women / Industrial Workers & labourers / Child Labourers
are kept informed of the welfare provisions available to them. In pursuance of the direction of the
National Legal Services Authority, National Legal Services Day is observed on 9th of November every
year dedicating to the cause of bringing out equal opportunities and equal justice through Legal
Services in the State of Tamil Nadu.
ADR Centres
ADR Centres have been functioning in 30 districts. Awareness is being created among the public
on the concept of Mediation and the methods of ADR.
ADR Centre Buildings have been inaugurated in 24 Districts till 31.12.2015, out of which 9
buildings were inaugurated in the year 2015.
Under the 13th Finance Commission, initial work orders were issued for the construction of
new building for ADR centres for six district Head Quarters (Coimbatore, Nilgiris, Dharmapuri, Karur,
Pudukottai, and Sivagangai) and the construction work is under process.
The Awareness Campaign Team focuses on the rural labourers. During the campaign, the
features of the scheme are explained to the labourers. The Team interacts with them and guides
and advises them to be aware of their legal rights and benefits under the scheme and assists them
to resolve their disputes.
HELP LINE
Legal assistance / advice through Telephones, was launched as early as on 23.04.2006 and is
functioning from that date onwards. Two lawyers are deputed on regular basis on all working days
during the working hours. Legal Advice is provided to the persons who approach the Authority, on
the spot. The helpline number is 044 – 25342441.
• On 03.01.2015 Photo Exhibition of Legal Services Authorities, Village Legal Care Support Centre
for Melathidiyur and Kurinchikulam Panchayat, Tirunelveli District was inaugurated.
• On the Republic Day function, viz., 26.01.2015, awards were presented to the staff of DLSA and
Para Legal Volunteer for their dedicated services in legal services.
• On 28.01.2015 Parliamentary Standing Committee meeting was held at ADR building, Chennai
(on public grievance, law and justice).
• On 08.02.2015 Legal Aid Clinics and legal awareness camp for unorganized labour were
inaugurated at Rajiv Gandhi National Institute of Youth Development at Sriperumbudur.
5) Power Point Presentation by Member Secretary about the activities of Legal Services
Institution.
• On 23.02.2015 a Drawing and Essay Competition was conducted in three schools in North
Madras.
• On 30.03.2015 Alternative Disputes Resolution Centre for Tiruvallur District was inaugurated.
• On 24.05.2015 Foundation Stone was laid for Construction of ADR building for the Nilgiris District
and Legal Literacy Camp and Awareness Camp were conducted.
• On 14.06.2015 ADR centre at Nagapattinam and Village Legal Care and Support Centre were
inaugurated at Thirupoondi village, Kilveli Taluk, Nagapattinam. On the same day, ADR Centre
at Combined Court Building, Perambalur was inaugurated.
• On 27.06.2015 ADR centre was inaugurated at Erode District and Orientation Programme for
Judicial Officers and Para Legal Volunteers on NALSA Scheme was conducted (Erode, Karur and
Tiruppur Districts).
• Flags-off mobile vans for Traffic Rules Awareness Campaign was inaugurated in the presence
of the representatives of United India Insurance Co. Ltd., and Police Officials at Satta Udhavi
Maiyam Buildings, Chennai.
• On 12.10.2015 World Mental Health Day was observed by the TNSLSA in association with
Institute of Mental Health at the Institute of Mental Health, Chennai.
• On 31.10.2015 ADR building at Thanjavur was inaugurated and Orientation programme for
Judicial Officers and Para Legal Volunteers on NALSA schemes was conducted at Thanjavur.
• Training Programme for advancing lawyering skills for panel advocates of DLSA, Tiruvarur was
inaugurated at Tiruvarur ADR Centre.
• On 20.11.2015 and 21.11.2015 Learning and Sharing Workshops in Tamil Nadu, to end Violence
Against Women (VAW) (Lawyers collective), was inaugurated at the ADR Building, Chennai.
• On 30.11.2015 Video Conferencing was held – Hon’ble Chief Justice – Patron – in – Chief, TNSLSA
and Hon’ble Executive Chairman, TNSLSA, and Executive Chairman of the HCLSC and other
Committee Judges, at the Conference Hall, High Court, Madras with all the Chairmen, DLSAs,
and Chief Judicial Magistrates of all Districts with regard to National Lok Adalat scheduled to
be held on 12.12.2015.
STATISTICS
Camps organized and the applications received
The Executive Chairman of UTPLSA is Hon’ble Mr. Justice M. Jaichandren, Judge, High Court,
Madras.
The said Village Legal Care and Support Centres are functioning in the School and Panchayat
Offices, on 1st and 3rd Saturday of every month from 10.00 am to 5.00 pm.
DOORDHARSHAN PROGRAMMES
The Union Territory of Puducherry in co-ordination with Doordarshan, Puducherry started
telecasting “Needhimandra Seidigal” every Friday from 6.00 pm to 6.15 pm. The activities of Union
Territory of Puducherry Legal Services Authority, Legal Services Programmes and other news relating
to Indian Judiciary are being shown in the said programme.
• On 1-05-2015, viz., the International Labour Day, the UTPLSA organized a Legal Literacy
Programme, exclusively for the Construction Workers, by involving Labour Officers from Labour
Department of Government of Puducherry, where various welfare schemes being implemented
by the construction Workers Welfare Board were explained to the construction workers.
Advocates have also taken part.
• On 23.05.2015, International Aids Candle light Memorial, 2015 was organized by Puthuvai Cluny
Social Service Trust- Vihaan CSC, a Non Government organization involved in serving the HIV
affected people, and during the event, the Panel Advocates of UTPLSA and the staff of UTPLSA
participated and graced the occasion.
• As per the directions of NALSA dated 2-4-2015, Essay Competitions to School & College Students
on the Topic of “Fundamental Duties” have been held in School and colleges at Puducherry,
Karaikal and Yanam, and the winners, numbering 255, were rewarded.
• On 10-10-2015 the UTPLSA, got the Welfare Schemes, implemented by the Government for the
Workers of Organized Sectors, translated them in Tamil and printed in the form of a Brochure.
The brochure was distributed to the Workers and General Public through all 55 Village Legal
Care and Support Centres, functioning in the UT of Puducherry.
• On 10-10-2015, the identity cards and certificates for the Para Legal Volunteers have been issued
by the Hon’ble Chief Minister of Puducherry to the Para Legal Volunteers, who had undergone
Orientation and Induction Courses as per guidelines of NALSA.
• On 13-10-2015, a meeting was conducted for ascertaining the conditions and existing facilities at
the Shelter Homes/Observation Home and on Child & Drug Abuse. The Member Secretary and
the Presiding Judge of Juvenile Justice Board, and Panel Advocates and other officials discussed
about the conditions and existing facilities at the Shelter Homes / Observation Home.
• On 28-11-2015, an Essay Competition was held on the topic of Fundamental Duties as enshrined
in the Constitution of India at Yanam and Certificates and prizes were distributed to the 54
winners.
• On 12-12-2015, certificates were distributed to the participants in the Essay Competition held
on the topic of Fundamental Duties as enshrined in the Constitution of India, and prizes were
distributed to 48 winners.
• News Letter of the UTPLSA, for the year 2015 was released by Hon’ble Chief Justice of Madras
High Court. First copy was received by the Hon’ble Chief Minister of Puducherry.
• On 19-12-15, at Mahe, prizes were distributed to the winners in the Essay Competition held
on the topic of Fundamental Duties as enshrined in the Constitution of India.
Conciliation Cell
The Committee provides legal assistance to the public, in particular to the poor litigants
(i) to conduct their cases, including Habeas Corpus Petition before the High Court, by
engaging Advocates from the approved list of panel of lawyers;
(iii) answer the queries of the applicants / litigants for inclusion of cases in the Lok Adalat
or with regard to the cases pending or settled in the Lok Adalats.
The Committee, with the co-ordination of the Lok Adalat Section, High Court, Madras, is
organizing Mega Lok Adalats / National Lok Adalats presided over by the Hon’ble sitting Judges of
the Madras High Court as directed by NALSA. The High Court Legal Services Committee is conducting
permanent and continuous Lok Adalats (2 Benches on daily basis) presided over by the Hon’ble Retired
Judges of the Madras High Court along with one retired Judicial officer and one Advocate as Members.
Legal Aid is extended to all the applicants, after obtaining the opinion of the panel lawyers. The
Committee maintains an approved list of panel advocates to assist the applicants and an approved
list of Retired District Judges, Sub Judges and Lawyers for the nomination in the Continuous and also
National Mega Lok Adalat. Two Benches of Permanent and Continuous Lok Adalats, presided over
by a Retired Hon’ble Judge with Two Members, of which one is a Retired District Judge and the other
from Advocate fraternity for each Bench, on daily basis in the Madras High Court were constituted
on 01.10.2007 and the said Two Benches are functioning in the first floor of Alternative Disputes
Resolution Centre, North Fort Road, Chennai-104.
As per the mandate of the National Legal Services Authority, Supreme Court of India, New
Delhi, the High Court Legal Services Committee, High Court, Madras-104, has conducted 9 National
Lok Adalats from 01.01.2015 to 31.12.2015.
Functioning under an institutionalized Charter and Scheme, the Tamil Nadu Mediation and
Conciliation Centre is the first Court-Annexed Mediation Centre in the country. It commenced
functioning from 09.04.2005 with 52 trained mediators in the two rooms allotted at the entrance
of the High Court at that time. From 01.04.2008 the Tamil Nadu Mediation and Conciliation Centre
has become a wing of the Tamil Nadu State Legal Services Authority.
Infrastructure
• High Court Centre
* Absolute sound proof rooms (10 rooms);
• In Chennai, two floors of the ADR building have been allotted wherein the City Civil Court,
Family Court and Labour Court mediation Centres are located, and in one floor, there is a
permanent training facility / conference hall and rooms for office purposes.
• In many Districts, ADR centres have already been built and Mediation Centres are housed
in them.
• In places where there are no ADR buildings, spaces have been allocated for Mediation
Centres and we are inching forward in the provision of infrastructure.
Functions
Mediation Centres are functioning in 30 Districts in the State of Tamil Nadu. In respect of
Tiruvarur and Ariyalur Districts, steps are being taken to establish Mediation Centre, after training
Mediators. Training Programmes viz., 40 Hours Mediation Training Programme, Referral Judges
Programme, Awareness Programme, are being organized.
3. AWARENESS PROGRAMMES
(A) Awareness Programme for Law Students
Continuous awareness programmes were held at the Mediation Halls of Tamil Nadu Mediation
and Conciliation Centre for law students. About 240 students of Government Law College,
Chengalpattu, were permitted to visit the Mediation Centre between 02.09.2015 and 10.09.2015,
in a batch of 35 students each and they were also allowed to observe only at the introduction.
The content of the Programme included a Lecture by a Trainer about the process of mediation,
procedure and conduct of mediation and referral by Courts. After the Lecture, a mediation
model movie was screened and the students were also supplied with Mediation Pamphlets
both in English as well as in Vernacular language.
6. STATISTICS
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT REGARDING MEDIATION CASES IN THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU UPTO
THE PERIOD ENDING 31.12.2015
LOUNGE
The Madras High Court Arbitration Centre got inaugurated on 28.03.2015 in the First floor of
the newly constructed Records Building situated in the High Court campus, Chennai. The Madras
High Court Arbitration Centre (MHCAC) (Internal Management) Rules, 2014 the Madras High Court
Arbitration Centre (MHCAC) (Arbitration Proceedings)Rules, 2014 and the Madras High Court
Arbitration Centre (MHCAC) (Administrative Cost and Arbitrator’s Fees) Rules, 2014, came into effect
vide Gazette Notification dated 01.04.2015. The Arbitration Centre has become functional after its
inauguration on 22.6.2015.
Infrastructure :
• Four Arbitration halls fully air conditioned with Multi Media Projector with Screen
facility.
• Reception
• Administrative Hall
• Waiting Hall
• Library
• Dining Room
• Record Room
Functioning :
136 cases have been referred from the Hon’ble High Court filed under section 11 of the
Arbitration and Conciliation Act and arbitral proceedings are being conducted in the centre regularly.
A sum of Rs.3,000/- has been fixed for utilizing the facilities of the Madras High Court Arbitration
Centre and totally a sum of Rs.5,72,088/- is collected till 31.12.2015 towards rental for utilizing the
facilities of the Madras High Court Arbitration Centre.
Grievance Redressal Mechanism is part and parcel of the machinery of any administration. In
fact, it is the gauge to measure the efficiency and effectiveness of the administration of an institution
and unless and until an effective grievance redressal mechanism is established, no administration can
claim to be accountable and responsive.
In the High Court, Madras, the complaints / grievances received from the public / litigant/
advocates against the Judicial Officers and staff of the subordinate Judiciary, are attended to
immediately. However, to protect the judicial officers from frivolous complaints / grievances, a system
has been devised, viz., to proceed with the complaints / grievances, only on receipt of an sworn
affidavit with verifiable material from the complainant. A complaint Cell has been constituted to
redress the complaints / grievances of public against the Judicial Officers / Officers of the High Court
and it is functioning from 01.04.2014.
A High Level Committee consisting of three Hon’ble Judges has been constituted in the High
Court to redress the grievances of the staff members of the High Court. Likewise, another High Level
Committee with three Hon’ble Judges has been constituted in the High Court for redressal of the
grievances of the subordinate staff.
In the year 2015, totally 1889 complaints were received against the Judicial Officers. After
forwarding the grievances / complaints to be dealt with by other offices / department (numbering
around 407 – both at the principal seat and at the Madurai Bench, the balance of 1482 grievances /
complaints were dealt with in the manner narrated above and quietus has been given to 311 files,
after due consideration of various aspects involved. Rest of the grievances / complaints is at different
stages of action.
With regard to the grievances of the subordinate Court staff under the Tamil Nadu Judicial
Ministerial Service, 27 grievances received were disposed of.
Crisis Management
The complaints are attended to promptly and the Committee is conducting regular meetings
and resolving the problems without any delay.
Volunteers
18 Volunteers have been selected to assist the Committee in the Gender Sensitization, to enable
the aggrieved persons to approach the Committee and their names are made available in the Madras
High Court’s official website.
The High Court has framed a Policy to prevent gender discrimination and sexual harassment in
the Madras High Court precincts and it was published and the said Policy in English and Tamil version
is made available in the official Website of Madras High Court. The complaint format, in Tamil and
English, is also made available in the Website.
Financial Requirement
The Government has been addressed for sanction of funds / infrastructural facilities for
implementation of the Regulation and execution of the same. Orders of the Government in this
regard are awaited.
8 COMPANY APPEAL 74 24 20 78
11 MATRIMONIAL CASE 1 0 1 0
12 REFERRED CASE 97 0 0 97
14 CONTEMPT APPEAL 10 3 9 4
3 MATRIMONIAL SUIT 9 0 0 9
6 ELECTION PETITION 7 1 2 6
WRIT JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL JURISDICTION
1 REFERRED TRIAL 1 3 0 4
APPELLATE JURISDICTION
1 FIRST APPEAL 1342 255 71 1526
2 APPEAL AGAINST ORDER 6939 1430 793 7576
3 APPEAL AGAINST APPELLATE ORDER 253 41 11 283
4 CIVIL REVISION PETITION 8021 2848 3099 7770
5 SECOND APPEAL 11535 826 314 12047
6 CROSS OBJECTION 138 37 16 159
7 WRIT APPEAL 3004 1479 1072 3411
8 CONTEMPT PETITION 1412 1716 1263 1865
9 SEPCIAL TRIBUNAL CASE 39 0 0 39
10 REVIEW APPLN. (WRIT) 125 66 26 165
11 REVIEW APPLN. (CIVIL) 379 172 98 453
12 COMPANY APPEAL 1 0 1 0
13 LETTERS PATENT APPEAL 2 1 0 3
14 CONTEMPT APPEAL 4 2 2 4
15 TAX CASE 575 6 4 577
WRIT JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION 32573 23666 17648 38591
CRIMINAL JURISDICTION
1 CRIMINAL APPEAL 2152 385 629 1908
2 HABEAS CORPUS PETITION 452 1814 1924 342
3 CRIMINAL REVESION CASE 2196 630 845 1981
4 CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION 10113 25004 25335 9782
5 REFFERED TRIAL 0 0 0 0
GRAND TOTAL 81255 60378 53151 88482
109
110
STATEMENT SHOWING DISTRICT
DISTRICT-WISE,
& SUBORDINATE
CATEGORY-WISE INSTITUTION
COURTS OF TAMIL NADUOFAND
CASES
PUDUCHERRY
FOR THE PERIOD 01.01.2015 TO
31.12.2015
STATEMENT
IN DISTRICT
SHOWING & SUBORDINATE
DISTRICT WISE,COURTS
CATEGORY
OF TAMIL
WISE INSTITUTION
NADU AND PUDUCHERRY
OF CASES
FOR THE PERIOD FROM 01.01.2015 TO 31.12.2015
CIVIL CRIMINAL
SL. NAME OF THE GRAND
CMA OTHER SPL. CRL. O.A & SPL.
NO. DISTRICTS OS AS RCOP MCOP LAOP HMOP EP TOTAL S.C. CRP I.P.C MC NI.ACT TOTAL TOTAL
RCA OP's COURTS APPL. O.L COURTS
CHENNAI City Civil Court 8414 831 311 0 0 3 0 231 4046 0 13836 797 500 130 33 5 0 0 8 1473 15309
111
112
DISTRICT & SUBORDINATE COURTS OF TAMIL NADU AND PUDUCHERRY
STATEMENT SHOWING DISTRICT WISE - CATEGORY WISE PENDENCY AS ON 31.12.2015
CIVIL CRIMINAL
SL. SPL. SPL.
NAME OF THE DISTRICT CMA OTHER CRL. CR.REV O.A & GRAND
NO. OS AS RCOP MCOP LAOP HMOP EP COURTS / TOTAL SESS. I.P.C MC NI.ACT COURTS/ TOTAL
RCA OP's APPL. PET. O.L TOTAL
OTHERS OTHERS
More
Category than 30 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 TOTAL
years
ORIGINAL SIDE
CS 30 5 2 4 10 8 5 5 14 25 34 52 51 83 143 184 280 244 203 229 204 380 270 352 382 397 483 553 595 586 516 676 7005
OMS 1 2 1 3 1 1 9
ELP 1 3 1 1 6
CONT.P 17 4 9 7 14 8 5 18 11 20 42 126 103 205 226 495 649 1479 3438
CP 5 1 2 1 1 1 7 5 4 5 21 18 20 31 12 9 19 26 16 6 24 25 30 37 46 65 137 167 341 1082
IP 1 5 1 24 20 20 15 18 15 4 13 9 11 16 10 13 13 10 41 259
OA 1 3 2 3 2 15 28 26 82 115 110 179 260 337 273 366 493 591 507 422 395 553 703 1037 6503
OP 73 2 5 3 5 2 3 6 8 13 7 16 12 31 19 24 30 35 23 40 33 41 59 77 84 135 152 217 265 338 345 723 2826
TOS 13 1 2 4 2 3 5 10 8 6 5 6 7 8 6 19 18 17 26 23 26 12 18 18 31 29 7 87 17 36 470
APPL 38 49 34 21 59 17 24 33 275
APPELLATE SIDE
CMA 1 2 3 13 41 43 51 147 202 633 642 564 896 1038 1049 1660 1355 2243 2282 2153 15018
AS 4 10 3 37 74 71 68 95 157 197 397 377 500 374 308 727 3399
CRP 10 10 12 117 180 207 224 266 333 669 773 1217 1609 2485 2783 2817 13712
CMSA 2 1 6 7 1 7 12 5 32 12 16 21 15 39 22 29 48 34 51 39 33 432
OSA 2 10 12 11 62 54 69 98 148 151 125 125 867
LPA 7 3 1 7 2 1 1 1 1 5 29
COM APEL 7 15 14 9 4 6 7 16 78
CONT A 1 1 2 4
RC 2 5 19 9 7 15 11 7 13 6 3 97
RCP 2 3 1 1 2 1 10
SA 15 9 29 11 39 69 121 148 323 394 553 482 643 844 854 366 824 1228 791 1306 1284 1099 1182 1087 895 14596
STA 1 2 2 1 4 1 11
WA 1 2 10 9 10 96 25 23 22 35 115 367 440 746 1132 566 966 4565
TC 11 47 71 258 996 940 985 549 348 770 860 990 6825
Cros.obj 1 3 1 3 3 2 4 1 2 13 2 8 31 8 13 25 38 30 95 46 50 82 60 521
REV.APPL 4 4 12 6 7 8 17 3 18 1 24 53 65 45 59 53 47 72 72 80 50 71 86 191 1048
CRIMINAL SIDE
RT 1 3 4
CA 2 1 1 6 11 54 77 85 105 187 307 349 446 458 574 748 751 619 763 5544
CRL.R.C. 1 4 7 4 7 17 37 52 261 735 657 639 529 740 3690
CRL.O.P 1 4 6 7 19 20 39 40 43 299 1008 1320 1202 1412 1766 2781 9967
H.C.P 1 1 2 27 17 40 989 1077
WRIT
W.P. 4 1 3 79 23 13 25 22 38 94 211 885 2505 5444 4197 2889 2687 3183 3390 5795 5858 8854 12726 14879 18774 92579
113
114
MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
STATEMENT SHOWING AGE WISE PENDENCY OF CASES (CATEGORY WISE) AS ON 31.12.2015
Cate Year 85 86 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 TOTAL
gory
LPA 1 1 1 3
STA 1 8 7 18 3 1 1 39
SA 1 1 1 1 4 15 34 40 109 90 257 395 479 424 683 835 1021 847 821 677 708 545 968 671 780 892 748 12047
CMA 10 36 97 244 385 509 501 688 665 757 1439 1018 1227 7576
CMSA 1 4 6 18 12 7 16 34 43 27 40 37 38 283
CRP 3 1 2 3 2 2 6 17 10 49 330 347 292 322 432 814 763 1000 800 1142 1433 7770
CRL.A 3 1 1 8 27 61 122 125 158 150 155 138 136 250 244 329 1908
CRL RC 19 65 290 225 354 261 144 228 149 246 1981
TOTAL 2 0 1 4 9 4 17 16 32 61 75 148 105 281 411 497 479 725 1003 1597 1898 1941 3008 3815 6267 7016 8609 12847 16349 21265 88482
DISTRICT & SUBORDINATE COURTS OF TAMIL NADU AND PUDUCHERRY
STATEMENT SHOWING DISTRICT WISE - AGE WISE PENDENCY OF CIVIL CASES
AS ON 31.12.2015
on 31.12.2015
More than 20
Pendency as
11 - 15 years
16 - 20 years
Name of the
6 - 10 years
Upto 1yr
1 - 2 year
2 - 3 year
3 - 4 year
4 - 5 year
Court
years
S.No.
Total
CHENNAI
City Civil Court 8595 6148 2709 1833 1489 2679 667 330 284 24734
1 Court of Small Causes 11704 7905 5357 2167 1346 1751 368 37 1 30636
MM Courts 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Special Courts 8718 3562 2352 1627 2366 1081 410 61 31 20208
2 ARIYALUR 1901 1388 1372 827 461 2754 512 167 33 9415
3 COIMBATORE 10866 7948 6477 4331 2680 6033 993 296 275 39899
4 CUDDALORE 9610 7611 3959 2765 1819 3234 812 188 135 30133
5 DHARMAPURI 3208 3036 1350 975 371 534 230 54 15 9773
6 DINDIGUL 5848 4093 2954 2307 1795 3750 679 98 13 21537
7 ERODE 7575 3226 2194 1397 980 1557 268 38 20 17255
8 KANCHEEPURAM 8464 5732 4625 4010 2445 4893 2959 240 148 33516
9 KANNIYAKUMARI 4464 3590 2184 1217 783 1341 315 133 113 14140
10 KARUR 3068 2297 1391 974 705 544 141 24 10 9154
11 KRISHNAGIRI 4525 3161 1505 986 820 2084 298 51 32 13462
12 MADURAI 14450 7766 4939 3940 2612 3738 1430 198 60 39133
13 NAGAPATTINAM 2744 1852 1097 736 416 413 44 19 10 7331
14 NAMAKKAL 3584 4275 2557 1633 1301 1751 646 60 27 15834
15 NILGIRIS 1232 623 401 243 272 655 166 37 13 3642
16 PERAMBALUR 2116 1406 760 613 413 1327 189 41 12 6877
17 PUDUKKOTTAI 4718 2478 1127 1102 619 680 231 66 42 11063
18 RAMANATHAPURAM 2191 688 562 706 461 402 78 17 12 5117
19 SALEM 12092 6622 4919 3818 2601 3908 825 216 75 35076
20 SIVAGANGA 2868 2287 1419 836 534 1001 134 39 16 9134
21 THANJAVUR 5408 4251 2553 1577 1187 1524 382 63 46 16991
22 THENI 3545 2688 1126 810 507 618 102 14 1 9411
23 TIRUCHIRAPALLI 10498 5196 4337 3513 2498 4774 1505 259 76 32656
24 TIRUNELVELI 9051 5348 3460 2378 1686 2044 308 60 32 24367
25 TIRUPPUR 8215 4977 3738 3448 2166 3730 406 100 37 26817
26 TIRUVALLUR 8336 5609 3835 2994 2285 3953 639 171 105 27927
27 TIRUVANNAMALAI 5209 3716 2870 1832 1935 2540 706 248 72 19128
28 TIRUVARUR 2404 1086 604 426 227 325 67 9 11 5159
29 TUTICORIN 3970 2335 1499 1039 792 1004 153 51 11 10854
30 VELLORE 8935 6545 3727 3023 1753 2744 1273 239 81 28320
31 VILLUPURAM 9472 6668 4233 2684 2177 3252 487 119 65 29157
32 VIRUDHUNAGAR 4158 2857 1901 1226 1124 2007 471 89 8 13841
PUDUCHERRY 3603 2767 1991 1481 1193 1305 262 89 29 12720
Total Pendency as
Name of the Court
on 31.12.2015
More than 20
11 - 15 years
16 - 20 years
6 - 10 years
Upto 1yr
1 - 2 year
2 - 3 year
3 - 4 year
4 - 5 year
years
S.No.
CHENNAI
834 516 387 236 166 326 130 44 20 2659
City Civil Court
1 Court of Small Causes 0 1 3 1 0 68 2 0 0 75
MM Courts 8838 6252 5908 4551 3780 4466 1464 201 53 35513
Special Courts 1546 578 224 115 96 160 119 35 24 2897
2 ARIYALUR 997 920 625 296 103 537 68 1 2 3549
3 COIMBATORE 7833 5833 4522 3414 1835 1950 373 28 5 25793
4 CUDDALORE 3905 2498 1652 1425 1118 1815 511 44 22 12990
5 DHARMAPURI 1144 1279 830 649 627 1020 603 312 84 6548
6 DINDIGUL 3199 2953 1751 1953 1209 3594 760 72 3 15494
7 ERODE 3923 3670 2001 1302 946 1529 398 93 16 13878
8 KANCHEEPURAM 4575 4216 3363 2691 2341 4516 1083 468 324 23577
9 KANNIYAKUMARI 3035 3644 4013 2500 1926 3146 1011 296 17 19588
10 KARUR 1862 1123 792 766 646 593 199 7 1 5989
11 KRISHNAGIRI 2352 1945 1759 776 777 1566 957 254 45 10431
12 MADURAI 13196 5035 3434 1592 1233 1015 212 14 5 25736
13 NAGAPATTINAM 2503 1272 1251 914 549 1179 167 33 1 7869
14 NAMAKKAL 2063 1397 922 926 395 913 76 3 1 6696
15 NILGIRIS 1170 874 595 381 317 989 344 99 3 4772
16 PERAMBALUR 609 733 261 146 192 870 431 83 6 3331
17 PUDUKKOTTAI 2056 1900 1245 771 884 1199 306 38 2 8401
18 RAMANATHAPURAM 1240 1263 1004 683 1057 263 32 15 2 5559
19 SALEM 2234 3429 3695 4161 1381 687 161 95 11 15854
20 SIVAGANGA 3149 1776 1177 830 666 1773 441 26 9 9847
21 THANJAVUR 4737 3619 2832 1968 1416 1446 185 78 56 16337
22 THENI 2126 2241 1372 1052 642 760 48 3 0 8244
23 TIRUCHIRAPALLI 4041 2213 1331 942 641 1928 513 113 22 11744
24 TIRUNELVELI 7059 5538 3632 2899 2240 3208 392 47 44 25059
25 TIRUPPUR 4504 2852 2515 1997 1586 3204 559 41 14 17272
26 TIRUVALLUR 5055 4216 3392 1481 952 570 214 49 23 15952
27 TIRUVANNAMALAI 2003 2109 1665 1146 878 2364 542 110 4 10821
28 TIRUVARUR 1963 1250 969 767 510 1113 94 7 0 6673
29 TUTICORIN 4743 3753 2139 1770 1400 2160 292 39 6 16302
30 VELLORE 3478 1740 1721 1511 1024 1586 230 36 10 11336
31 VILLUPURAM 2778 2553 2049 1290 1396 2031 545 107 24 12773
32 VIRUDHUNAGAR 2573 2394 1511 1478 1448 1840 271 4 18 11537
PUDUCHERRY 4211 2806 1115 1107 1065 1804 129 15 1 12253
CATEGORY OF CASES ( CI VI L )
SL. NAM E OF THE
NO COURT TR
CRP SA CM A CM SA CM Ps WP AS WA TOTAL
CM P
2 ARIYALUR 17 4 2 - - - - - - 23
4 CUDDALORE 90 45 11 - 1 3 4 15 - 169
5 DHARMAPURI 13 1 1 - - 9 2 2 - 28
7 KANCHEEPURAM 54 9 6 - 4 7 4 4 - 88
8 KRISHNAGIRI 35 7 3 - 1 2 4 1 - 53
9 NAGAPATTINAM 29 19 7 - - 1 - 5 - 61
11 NILGIRIS 21 6 1 - - 3 - 4 - 35
12 PERAMBALUR 7 - 1 - - 1 - 1 - 10
14 TIRUPPUR 40 10 4 - - - 1 1 - 56
15 TIRUVALLUR 29 4 1 - 1 2 1 3 - 41
16 TIRUVANNAMALAI 36 23 7 - - 1 - 1 - 68
17 TIRUVARUR 19 7 - - - - - - - 26
18 VELLORE 24 9 7 - 2 10 9 3 - 64
19 VILLUPURAM 41 11 7 - - 3 - 3 - 65
PONDICHERRY 45 30 2 - - 4 6 40 1 128
3 KARUR 49 11 2 - - 1 - - - 63
4 MADURAI 67 4 3 11 - 40 6 20 1 152
5 PUDUKOTTAI 49 8 5 2 1 2 4 - - 71
6 RAMANATHAPURAM 18 2 2 1 - - - - - 23
7 SIVAGANGA 25 13 2 - - - - - - 40
8 THANJAVUR 69 19 3 1 10 - 9 - - 111
9 THENI 42 7 2 - 3 - - - - 54
10 TIRUCHIRAPALLI 90 33 6 1 13 7 5 - 1 156
12 TUTICORIN 56 5 3 - - - - - - 64
13 VIRUDHUNAGAR 44 8 6 - 1 1 - - 1 61
1 DINDIGUL 1 6 - 7
2 KANNIYAKUMARI 4 17 2 23
3 KARUR 1 7 - 8
4 MADURAI 4 6 8 18
5 PUDUKOTTAI - 4 1 5
6 RAMANATHAPURAM - 11 - 11
7 SIVAGANGA - 10 6 16
8 THANJAVUR 3 9 - 12
9 THENI 4 11 2 17
10 TIRUCHIRAPALLI 3 18 2 23
11 TIRUNELVELI 3 48 1 52
12 TUTICORIN 3 5 - 8
13 VIRUDHUNAGAR 1 8 - 9
IP
SA
AS
CS
EP
CP
TC
OP
OA
WP
WA
STA
LPA
OSA
TOS
CRP
HCP
S.NO
CM A
TM SA
CM SA
CRL.A
TOTAL
M at.Suit
CONT.P
CRL. OP
CRL. RC
CJ/JUDGE
Comp.Apl
Cross.Obj.
CONT APEL
M I SC CASES
GRAND TOTAL
NAM E OF HON'BLE
REV. APPL (CI VI L)
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF
1 401 204 32 8 1 9 19 1 8 300 5 208 2614 18 4 3832 4272 8104
JUSTICE
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE
2 SATISH KUMAR 2 809 6 30 32 87 2596 30 1 1 1 3595 5144 8739
AGNIHOTRI
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE
3 14 1 18 28 1 1 34 443 1 1 938 1480 789 2269
M.JAICHANDREN
121
122
IP
SA
AS
CS
EP
CP
TC
OP
OA
WP
WA
STA
LPA
OSA
TOS
CRP
HCP
S.NO
CM A
TM SA
CM SA
CRL.A
TOTAL
M at.Suit
CONT.P
CRL. OP
CRL. RC
CJ/JUDGE
Comp.Apl
Cross.Obj.
CONT APEL
M I SC CASES
GRAND TOTAL
NAM E OF HON'BLE
REV. APPL (CI VI L)
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE
18 16 2 1 36 29 4057 201 34 2054 6430 2409 8839
C.T.SELVAM
TOTAL 1164 3433 4889 442 2843 20 6046 1054 47 16 2 22 19 502 144 370 15 3 883 318 138 2 504 3656 57487 249 51897 2491 1428 9999 150083 125366 275449
CATEGORY -WISE DISPOSAL OF CASES BY THE JUDGES FOR THE PERIOD THEY SERVED IN
MADRAS HIGH COURT IN THE YEAR - 2015
IP
SA
AS
CS
EP
CP
TC
OP
OA
WP
WA
STA
LPA
OSA
TOS
CRP
HCP
S.NO
CM A
TM SA
CM SA
CRL.A
TOTAL
CRL.RC
M at.Suit
CONT.P
CRL.OP
HON'BLE
Comp.Apl
CJ/JUDGE
NAM E OF
Cross.Obj.
M I SC CASES
CONT APEL
REV. APPL(C)
GRAND TOTAL
REV. APPL(W)
THE HON'BLE MR.
JUSTICE N.PAUL
1 36 2 88 31 157 69 226
VASANTHAKUMAR
(ELEVATED ON 27.01.2015)
123
124
DISTRICT & SUBORDINATE COURTS OF TAMIL NADU AND PUDUCHERRY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF DISPOSAL FOR THE YEAR 2015 DISTRICT WISE - CATEGORY WISE
CIVIL CRIMINAL
CR.
SL. CMA OTHER CRL. REV V & O.A. & GRAND
NO. NAME OF THE DISTRICT OS AS RCA RCOP MCOP LAOP HMOP OP's EP IP OTHERS TOTAL SESS. APPL. PET. AC I.P.C O.L. MC N.I.Act OTHERS TOTAL TOTAL
CIVIL CRIMINAL
SL.
NAME OF THE DISTRICT Spl
NO.
CMA OTHER Courts/ CRL. CR.REV V & O.A. & GRAND
OS AS RCA RCOP MCOP LAOP HMOP OP's EP IP Others TOTAL SESS. APPL. PET. AC I.P.C O.L. MC N.I.Act OTHERS TOTAL TOTAL
CHENNAI City Civil Court 580 913 372 0 0 0 0 230 0 0 2095 683 527 138 3 0 0 0 0 1351 3446
1 Court of Small Causes 0 0 4 0 272 0 0 115 137 0 528 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 528
MM COURTS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SPECIAL COURTS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8089 8089 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 619 619 8708
2 ARIYALUR 21 126 6 0 607 0 9 85 88 2 944 225 25 10 14 16 0 0 0 290 1234
3 COIMBATORE 459 91 76 0 759 0 0 334 725 2963 5407 509 398 152 0 131 0 0 422 1612 7019
4 CUDDALORE 326 121 61 0 5129 0 44 150 256 120 6207 416 159 72 1 99 0 0 17 764 6971
5 DHARMAPURI 185 49 23 0 1303 0 214 133 172 0 2079 298 54 20 0 0 29 0 0 401 2480
6 DINDIGUL 178 101 70 0 827 0 146 367 614 29 2332 184 73 120 0 0 0 0 0 377 2709
7 ERODE 416 169 65 0 1381 0 440 152 225 0 2848 332 309 62 0 0 68 2 0 773 3621
8 KANCHEEPURAM 605 121 57 0 1341 0 384 276 264 2 3050 485 136 33 0 0 17 0 0 671 3721
9 KANNIYAKUMARI 66 41 13 0 233 0 0 491 60 2 906 250 254 16 0 0 2 0 0 522 1428
10 KARUR 52 42 14 0 541 0 0 66 77 0 792 155 218 23 0 0 0 0 0 396 1188
11 KRISHNAGIRI 204 61 25 0 1907 0 8 211 443 0 2859 260 133 28 1 324 0 0 0 746 3605
12 MADURAI 450 60 38 0 3481 0 0 433 619 1748 6829 658 168 159 15 0 0 0 554 1554 8383
13 NAGAPATTINAM 24 10 7 0 393 0 0 69 110 0 613 273 63 5 0 0 0 0 0 341 954
14 NAMAKKAL 257 53 28 0 2029 30 0 152 264 0 2813 123 75 9 1 24 0 0 0 232 3045
15 NILGIRIS 17 7 13 0 28 0 37 121 24 0 247 113 47 12 0 17 13 0 0 202 449
16 PERAMBALUR 10 9 6 0 1026 0 0 43 126 0 1220 61 0 5 1 0 0 0 0 67 1287
17 PUDUKKOTTAI 85 24 14 0 1474 0 0 75 281 0 1953 224 140 61 65 2 1 0 0 493 2446
18 RAMANATHAPURAM 56 24 17 0 211 0 0 213 43 0 564 178 34 21 4 5 0 0 0 242 806
19 SALEM 778 177 86 0 3013 0 0 1169 553 1201 6977 444 325 148 36 391 1 0 83 1428 8405
20 SIVAGANGA 64 43 20 0 245 0 96 165 152 0 785 536 165 31 0 0 0 0 0 732 1517
21 THANJAVUR 314 167 81 0 2451 55 41 135 694 14 3952 661 137 130 57 2 0 0 0 987 4939
22 THENI 106 28 13 0 377 0 0 109 535 19 1187 285 56 26 1 6 3 0 20 397 1584
23 TIRUCHIRAPALLI 413 116 23 0 2477 0 419 482 1107 187 5224 270 252 110 0 33 126 0 0 791 6015
24 TIRUNELVELI 260 124 121 0 1976 0 0 993 222 259 3955 1077 233 67 0 0 88 0 0 1465 5420
25 TIRUPPUR 607 101 93 0 4025 0 0 142 699 1 5668 387 194 42 4 0 0 0 0 627 6295
26 TIRUVALLUR 378 78 127 0 1682 38 125 345 686 1 3460 379 126 28 9 0 5 0 0 547 4007
27 TIRUVANNAMALAI 15 17 7 0 531 0 0 130 125 0 825 168 17 18 0 0 0 0 0 203 1028
28 TIRUVARUR 23 19 40 0 472 0 0 42 46 0 642 208 25 23 0 0 0 0 0 256 898
29 TUTICORIN 200 80 44 0 762 3 0 527 125 0 1741 686 115 27 0 50 0 0 0 878 2619
30 VELLORE 277 111 88 0 1510 0 305 168 672 575 3706 352 199 107 0 0 70 0 0 728 4434
31 VILLUPURAM 169 87 22 0 1170 0 334 184 97 22 2085 861 108 78 0 0 0 0 0 1047 3132
32 VIRUDHUNAGAR 52 43 62 0 229 0 174 48 27 22 657 307 208 36 0 30 1 0 27 609 1266
TOTAL 7647 3213 1736 0 43862 126 2776 8355 10268 0 15256 93239 12048 4973 1817 0 212 1130 424 2 1742 22348 115587
125
126
STATEMENT SHOWING DISPOSAL OF CASES (CATEGORY-WISE) IN CJM / SUB COURTS OF
TAMIL NADU & PUDUCHERRY IN 2015
CIVIL CRIMINAL
SL. GRAND
NAME OF THE DISTRICT Spl CR.
NO. CMA OTHER CRL. V& O.A. & TOTAL
OS AS RCOP MCOP LAOP HMOP EP IP Courts/ TOTAL SESS. REV I.P.C MC N.I.Act OTHERS TOTAL
RCA OP's APPL. AC O.L.
Others PET.
CIVIL CRIMINAL
Spl
CMA OTHER CRL. CR.REV V & O.A. & GRAND
SL. OS AS RCOP MCOP LAOP HMOP EP IP Courts/ TOTAL SESS. I.P.C MC N.I.Act OTHERS TOTAL
RCA OP's APPL. PET. AC O.L. TOTAL
NO. NAME OF THE DISTRICT Others
CHENNAI City Civil Court 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Court of Small Causes 0 0 2474 0 0 0 3 630 6 3113 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 0 26 3139
1
MM COURTS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2979 66568 7 13737 0 83291 83291
SPECIAL COURTS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 ARIYALUR 718 0 11 0 0 0 4 111 0 844 0 0 0 2060 2681 78 61 0 4880 5724
3 COIMBATORE 3184 0 262 0 0 0 16 417 0 3879 0 0 0 6580 31677 80 4441 0 42778 46657
4 CUDDALORE 2568 0 50 0 0 0 13 1765 10 4406 0 0 0 4076 6068 148 321 0 10613 15019
5 DHARMAPURI 924 0 10 0 0 0 4 131 0 1069 0 0 0 2386 18597 54 145 0 21182 22251
6 DINDIGUL 2133 0 79 0 0 0 14 347 5 2578 0 0 0 3333 26331 103 748 0 30515 33093
7 ERODE 2876 0 63 0 0 0 5 299 0 3243 0 0 0 3189 52516 144 2456 0 58305 61548
8 KANCHEEPURAM 2964 0 158 0 0 0 55 744 2 3923 0 0 0 5458 17776 133 1251 0 24618 28541
9 KANNIYAKUMARI 1690 0 17 0 0 0 26 250 1 1984 0 0 0 2340 5762 89 1012 0 9203 11187
10 KARUR 708 0 5 0 0 0 8 199 0 920 0 0 0 1957 16186 54 474 0 18671 19591
11 KRISHNAGIRI 930 0 26 0 0 0 364 135 0 1455 0 0 0 4022 12154 66 577 0 16819 18274
12 MADURAI 1573 0 179 0 0 0 19 264 0 2035 0 0 0 4230 15966 175 1823 0 22194 24229
13 NAGAPATTINAM 920 0 83 0 0 0 7 356 0 1366 0 0 0 2486 8619 107 323 0 11535 12901
14 NAMAKKAL 1391 0 8 0 0 0 6 137 1 1543 0 0 0 1752 14966 54 391 0 17163 18706
15 NILGIRIS 650 0 77 0 0 0 8 192 0 927 0 0 0 1042 10095 59 894 0 12090 13017
16 PERAMBALUR 385 0 4 0 0 0 1 36 0 426 0 0 0 600 741 163 17 0 1521 1947
17 PUDUKKOTTAI 689 0 33 0 0 0 90 177 0 989 0 0 0 3558 5021 32 333 0 8944 9933
18 RAMANATHAPURAM 456 0 17 0 0 0 349 91 0 913 0 0 0 2879 16413 131 93 0 19516 20429
19 SALEM 6216 0 126 0 0 0 81 944 1 7368 0 0 0 3058 28526 113 2693 0 34390 41758
20 SIVAGANGA 1018 0 49 0 0 0 43 287 0 1397 0 0 0 6102 19391 89 153 0 25735 27132
21 THANJAVUR 1512 0 50 0 0 0 14 382 153 2111 0 0 0 4517 12497 296 691 0 18001 20112
22 THENI 988 0 7 0 0 0 12 194 4 1205 0 0 0 3119 20101 76 265 0 23561 24766
23 TIRUCHIRAPALLI 3968 0 694 0 0 0 26 520 6 5214 0 0 0 4883 76868 101 1201 0 83053 88267
24 TIRUNELVELI 3524 0 113 0 0 0 554 488 2 4681 0 0 0 6126 11237 248 656 0 18267 22948
25 TIRUPPUR 2521 0 21 0 0 0 24 191 0 2757 0 0 0 4686 28703 267 1691 0 35347 38104
26 TIRUVALLUR 2239 0 164 0 0 0 4 372 2 2781 0 0 0 3142 16278 79 1128 0 20627 23408
27 TIRUVANNAMALAI 1373 0 15 0 0 0 7 350 1 1746 0 0 0 1880 4742 79 260 0 6961 8707
28 TIRUVARUR 662 0 33 0 0 0 3 208 0 906 0 0 0 2974 7029 69 178 0 10250 11156
29 TUTICORIN 1363 0 79 0 0 0 506 236 2 2186 0 0 0 3158 7758 164 155 0 11235 13421
30 VELLORE 2825 0 130 0 0 0 29 686 7 3677 0 0 0 4039 19912 225 951 0 25127 28804
31 VILLUPURAM 3621 0 15 0 0 0 19 857 0 4512 0 0 0 5024 25801 146 197 0 31168 35680
32 VIRUDHUNAGAR 1685 0 168 0 0 0 107 229 2 2191 0 0 0 2512 13168 132 476 0 16288 18479
TOTAL 58274 0 0 5220 0 0 0 2421 12225 0 205 78345 0 0 0 110147 620148 3761 39818 0 773874 852219
127
128 Madras High Court
Madras High Court 129
130 Madras High Court