Assessing The Four Language Skills
Assessing The Four Language Skills
Assessing The Four Language Skills
The four language skills that we assess on day-to-day basis are reading writing listening and speaking.
These skills should be Intergrated during assessment and not tested individually. This allows for language
ability to be assessed authentically and provides more washback.
Grammer vocabulary and phonology are not valid assessments as isolated items. A Grammer or
vocabulary test must be assessed within the realm of skills assessment. Otherwise, the test would be a
practice activity.
These aspects of language are part of integrated skills assessments and should not be treated separately
There are two interacting responses that we must consider when assessing integrated skills n
Performance
Competence
Performance is how a student carries out a certain act or task
Competency is his/her ability to accomplish the objective or goal of the task using the integrated skills.
Sometimes a performance does not demonstrate true competence:
A student may possess the competency to achieve the task or goal at hand, but his/her performance may
not result in the achievement of a given task due to reliability factor such as illness, emotional distraction,
validity of exam site, etc.,.
Multiple measures will always give you a more reliable and valid assessment than a single measure
Therefore, it is important to offer two or more performances and/or contexts in order to draw a
conclusion. Some examples are:
Several tests are combined to form an assessment \a single test with multiple test tasks to account for
learning style and performance variable.
In class and extra class graded work
Alternate form of assessments (e.g. journals, portfolios, conference, observation, self-assessment, peer
assessment)
Additionally, we must rely as must as possible on observable performance in our assessment of students
this means that we can see or hear the performance of the listener.
There are three main concepts in determining meaningful language assessment: validity, reliability, and
feasibility.
Validity means that what is assessed should actually be assessed.
Reliability refers to the accuracy of the decisions made from the assessment.
Feasibility means that the assessment has to be practical.
A language assessment can cover one or more of the following four key skills: reading, writing, speaking,
and listening.
Assessment Tools: Introduction
RUBRICS
For assessing qualitative student work such as essays, projects, reports, or presentations, we recommend
the use of rubrics. They serve well to denote clearly the specific expectations for an assignment and for
student performance. They can be used for grading, for providing feedback to students, and for informing
and encouraging students to think about their own learning.
Rubrics are not the only tool, however, for collecting data for assessment of student learning outcomes.
Depending on the outcomes to be assessed and on resources available (time and goodwill especially),
other methods and tools may serve well:
CURRICULUM MAPPING
While not a tool for data collection, a good curriculum map can serve to focus assessment, and the
improvements that follow, where it will be most useful, informative, or effective.
FOCUS GROUPS
The candid reflections or ideas from a small group of students or participants can provide unanticipated
insights valuable for guiding the direction and methods for assessments.
PORTFOLIOS
Portfolios can provide a window into the process of student learning, whether across a semester-long
project or a four-year tenure at the university, that can be assessed (usually by using a rubric).
STRUCTURED INTERVIEWS
While time-consuming, structured interviews are useful when you want to ask specific questions, but also
want to leave room for unplanned-for topics or ideas to emerge.
SURVEYS
Whether a program-based survey of current majors or recent alumni or an analysis of SERU survey results,
well-crafted survey questions can yield important information about student perceptions and
experiences.
Conducting an assessment takes time, thought, attention, planning, and often collaboration. Each
assessment tool, whether a short survey or detailed rubric, will be useful only insofar as it both addresses
the outcomes well and is feasible to use.